You are on page 1of 1

..........

,,

PENTOL

Economical Calculation of Final Results

Item

Final Results

Cost of PentoMuls p.a.

- 810'360

Cost of PentoMag p.a.

-295 '440

Rental Cost

- 28'700

Cost of Water (176'800 / m3)

-6'330

Loss of Water vaporisation

- 395 '340

Total Cost

- 1'536'170

2'734'697

173'890

Reduction of Exit gas temp (43 C)

43c

Reduction of unburned carbon


Reduction of Ash Disposal Cost

78 %

15'720

113'110

151'350

Reduction of soot blowing steam

103'410

Elimination of Fouling

Reduction of Excess Air


Reduction of atomising steam

50%

Boiler Tube cleaning

Total Benefits

2'993'846

Total Balance (Benefits - Cost)

1'457'676

Alternative Cost Ammonium Plant:

- 565 '560

Difference to PentoMuls/ PentoMag:

2'023'236

The net benefit of the combined PentoMag/ PentoMuls is proven clearly. It shows the
Ammonium Plant technology to be no economical alternative.

Conclusion
The calculation shows the combined PentoMuls / PentoMag treatment to be economically very
interesting. The environmental issues have been solved by increasing the net efficiency of the
boilers.
Reducing S03 with Ammonium is no alternative to a combined PentoMuls / PentoMag
application, as it offers no financial advantage.

August 20th, 2002

Pentol GmbH
Marco Mattiello
Combustion Engineer

Trial Report of 26.7 .2004

Pentol GmbH
Olivier Blauenstein
Project Manager

page 7 of 11

You might also like