World Politics: Towards a Critical Theoretic Understanding. Review of International Studies, 33(4). [Honneths aim is] to provide an appropriate grounding for the renewal of critical social theory, which would operate comprehensively at the level of contemporary social and political challenges. []. With Habermas, and those oriented towards deliberative democratic models of legitimation, Honneth proceeds from inter-subjectivist premises, leaving behind both the problematic heritage of the philosophy of the subject, and the associated philosophical and social scientific shortcomings of methodological individualism. However, Honneth moves beyond the confines of the formers lines of inquiry by exploring an integrated approach to the conditions of the formation of positive relations-to-self through intimate, legal and generalised relationships, mediated through registers beyond merely communicative action, which has been central to work in the context of the linguistic turn. The latter orientation has given rise to misapprehensions of the depth and scope of the inter-subjectivist turn in critical theory, not least in the context of the advances of the constructivist research project in IR. (709) Weber, M. (2010). Critical Theory and Contemporary World Politics. International Studies Review, 12(3). [CIRT has had a considerable influence on IR] The recent entrenchment of constructivismpace its heterogeneityas a central disciplinary research framework is, viewed in this context, in the broadest sense an indication of just how sustained a challenge reflectivism turned out to be for the main contenders in what has sometimes been called the inter-paradigm debate. To some extent, this perhaps unexpected efficacy can be understood better, when the formative moves of constructivisms arrival are taken into account. Critical theoretic scholarship, then, performed the prominent function of keeping IR as a disciplinary conversation in touch with philosophical, theoretical, and methodological debates in cogent disciplines. (444)