You are on page 1of 4
ARENCO [eect ngneing contre ue (er PRART ARREST reeel —e fete rit fost omnes [ow ome =< i teste gman operon TIE beeen ee 5 an = forte sre tors waa represent beeen er ress ina provi us wi be dos bas & osprey 0 be canoe i eg te at ws [Seamed oy ‘Signature: (Aw dae: ¥[lofzee lconments rs para ue of Constant ony Requested woiing land tobe considered in stucwal ccuatons as ‘Service Load —0.5 KN/m? ‘niches ive Load “1S RN/m + IZN/m along periphery and 1. k&/m distributed over THN /at ‘ontractor shal verily the loads against the revised architectural drawings fhe Bp ae no | Me Tushar Parkar fox =| Eco 4 From: Tushar Parka Sent Wecnesday October 14,015 1047 AM To! Maher albtar ce Zubair shad (Project Manages Syed Haider Masoom A Subject ratsas3 ‘Attachments: S-2080-RFS-183 pe ‘ear Maher, Reference to our discussion onthe enclosed RF, the RI hasbeen closed with andthe response drafted which sas below Requested working loads tobe consdered In structural calculations a follows: Senice load @54N/n2 Finishes -3.5N/m2 Partitions = 12 K/m olong periphery and 1.5 kN/m2 distributed over the ore. Contractor shal very the loads against the revised erchitectural drawings. Regards, Tushar esa ast se Plo ba eb ra =e ® oe dh aden - | SSS EP ee eee ere | See “$ eens $ Tap rea trees ers bod

You might also like