Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Course Description
Shifting demographics, increased life expectancy, advances in medical technology, economic and
financial realities: all these add to the challenges of navigating the later years with grace and
dignity. This class presents theory as well as experiential learning. For those who are working
with aging populations, interacting with and caring for aging parents or contemplating the aging
process, students will explore relevant issues at both the macro and micro level, including the
deconstruction of stereotypes.
Institutional Outcomes
The curriculum in Human Development, Marital and Family Therapy, and the Teacher Education
programs is organized around five areas in which students are expected to be competent. The
competencies are:
Development: Understanding of developmental theories.
PLO 2: Diversity: Students value diversity, demonstrate commitment to social justice, and are
able to analyze the dynamics of institutional and individual biases and use of power.
PLO 4: Research: Students are able to distinguish between observations and theory (reality and
fantasy, data and inferences/assumptions). Students collect verifiable and reliable data, present
their findings, and link their research with existing literature in the field.
apply developmentally and culturally appropriate practice with children and adults. Praxis
experience may involve activities such as practica, field work, or student teaching.
Student Learning Outcomes
SLO1: Student demonstrates knowledge of theories about elder development and developmental
change.
SLO2: Student demonstrates understanding of self from a developmental as well as sociocultural aspect in light of course concepts; elder development, aging, death and dying.
SLO4: Student demonstrates the ability to apply learning of theory to bring about change for
elders.
SLO5: Student demonstrates growth in the class, indicated by an improvement in one or more of
the following: writing or critical thinking skills, a willingness to take risks and authentically
engage with course material and classmates, and openness to new information and perspectives.
Course Requirements
Readings
Tuesdays with Morrie Mitch Albom ISBN 0-7679-0592
The experience we have as a class takes place in the context of a learning community. Quality
and characteristics of this community impact the quality of the learning experience for both the
student and the instructor. The culture of Pacific Oaks has some specific ideas about what a
learning community looks like. While this varies from instructor to instructor, it is likely that
you will find some similarities between instructors across the institution. It is often a goal to
promote construction of knowledge collaboratively between the students as well as student and
instructor. This is true for online classes as well as face to face classes.
An integral component of the learning community is pedagogy - the art of teaching. There are
lots of ways of teaching. None of these ways are right or wrong. Lots of things are taken in to
consideration when an instructor balances various approaches and weaves them into a learning
community. One philosophical aspect of selection of an approach has to do with the instructors
preference between learner and instructor centered pedagogy
As noted, one way of categorizing the pedagogical approach is to know where it is on the
continuum described by being learner centered at one end and teacher centered at the other.
Pacific Oaks generally prefers pedagogy that is towards the student centered portion of the
continuum. Because of this, it is valuable to focus on the learner for a moment, considering
some of the ways for students to increase the likelihood of success during their time at Pacific
Oaks.
In order to ensure growth and transformation, which is primary to the educational experience, the
student has a responsibility. Some of the student related items that pertain to this responsibility
are as follows:
What the individual student is able and willing to do is important, yet there are other equally
important components of the learning community. As mentioned previously, another part is the
pedagogical approach. In addition to the centeredness aspect of the pedagogy, there is another
issue to consider. In reviewing the approach that I use in teaching (interactive, collaborative and
constructivistic), an integral dynamics is dependence on the presence of others. Therefore, an
essential aspect of learning in a Pacific Oaks class has to do with relationships.
Relationships are essential for the kind of learning were seeking. Therefore it is useful to
explore the role of the relationship in the classroom. Being aware of the interrelated aspect of
learner and peers requires some attention to the interpersonal aspect of relationships. It is
important to get to know others in the class - everyone has something to contribute, a piece of the
puzzle. Establishing ground rules is a useful starting point. Exploring what happens when
conflict arises can provide a valuable structure, if needed. Discussion of group dynamics can be
useful in terms of relationships, also.
progress and learning. It also provides the institution with feedback which enables Pacific Oaks
to see how well they are doing and make adjustments when necessary.
There is an expectation that you will demonstrate value added and mastery at the end of this
class. Value added is just what it sounds like: what do you know now that you didnt know
before you took this class. Mastery refers to your level of competency of understanding the
course material (the integrating of content and your life experience). Both of these will then be
looked at to assess how you are doing. Lets examine how we will look at it, and I do mean
we because it is process where your input is important also.
The main instruments we use to measure your progress are scoring rubrics. Throughout the
session we will be addressing one or more of the student learning outcomes. Selected
assignments will be reviewed for how they address the student learning outcomes noted with the
appropriate Scoring rubric.
So you might wonder about the Student Learning Outcomes and where they come from. They
are an integral part of the overall learning plan. Heres how it goes: Mission Statement
Institutional Outcomes Program Level Outcomes Student Learning Outcomes. All of these
are related. Program Level Outcomes are what each department (Human Development) want
you to know when you complete your program. The student level outcomes help you attain the
program level outcomes.
An ongoing part of this process is feedback. As your instructor, I will give your feedback
throughout the class. This is formative feedback. At the end of the class, youll receive
summative feedback in the form of a narrative evaluation. As a way of understanding these
processes, think about making soup. As you make it, you taste it maybe add more salt, cook it
a little longer, a dash of this and that well that is formative feedback. When the soup is done,
you taste the soup and then critique the completed soupthis is summative feedback.
So this assessment process, on a class level, a program level and on an institutional level is about
how you are doing, providing feedback for you to reflect on and use to grow. The process is also
providing feedback for Pacific Oaks College to continually work to improve delivery of your
education.
Course Bibliography
How to Survive Your Aging Parents, Bernard H. Shulman, M.D. and Raeann Berman
Vital Involvement In Old Age, Erik Erikson, Joan Erikson, Helen Kivnick
Interpersonal Communication in Older Adulthood, Mary Lee Hummert, John M Wiemann, Jon F.
Nussbaum
The Handbook of Structured Life Review, Barbara K. Haight and Barrett S. Haight
Heidegger and a Hippo Walk Through Those Pearly Gates, Thomas Cathcart and Daniel Klein
Handbook of Theories of Aging, Editors, Vern Bengtson, Daphna Gans, Norella Putney, Merril
Silverstein
What are Old People For? How Elders Will Save the World, William H. Thomas, M.D.
From Age-ing to Sage-ing: A Profound New Vision of Growing Older, Zalman SchachterShalomi and Ronald S. Miller
The Generative Society: Caring for Future Generations, Edited by Ed de St. Aubin, Dan P.
McAdams, Tae-Chang Kim
The Healthy Aging Brain, Sustaining Attachment, Attaining Wisdom, Louis Cozolino
Victor Frankls Contribution to Sp[irituality and Aging, Edited by Melvin A. Kimble, PhD
Life Worth Living How Someone You Love Can Still Enjoy Life in a Nursing Home, William
H. Thomas, M.D.
Appendices
Appendix A: B.A. Program Learning Outcomes
PLO 1: Development: Students comprehend and analyze developmental theories.
PLO 2: Diversity: Students value diversity, demonstrate commitment to social justice, and are
able to analyze the dynamics of institutional and individual biases and use of power.
PLO 4: Research: Students are able to distinguish between observations and theory (reality and
fantasy, data and inferences/assumptions). Students collect verifiable and reliable data, present
their findings, and link their research with existing literature in the field.
SLO2: Student demonstrates understanding of self from a developmental as well as sociocultural aspect in light of course concepts; elder development, aging, death and dying.
SLO4: Student demonstrates the ability to apply learning of theory to bring about change for
elders.
SLO5: Student demonstrates growth in the class, indicated by an improvement in one or more of
the following: writing or critical thinking skills, a willingness to take risks and authentically
engage with course material and classmates, and openness to new information and perspectives.
No
Minimal
Credit BA
Theory (SLO1)
Student summarizes and synthesizes material
from books demonstrating comprehension of
salient points of elder development. Students
work is distinguished by its completeness,
thoroughness, creativity, expresses original
ideas and critical thinking.
Self (SLO2)
Student demonstrate comprehensive ,
detailed and deep understanding of self from a
developmental as well as socio-cultural aspect
in light of course concepts; aging, death and
dying theory
Sufficien BA
BA
advanced
Skilled
dying.
Component
No
credit BA
Papers Papers turned in on time, addresses
all the points in the assignment demonstrating
t BA
BA
d BA
The following academic policies are applicable to all Pacific Oaks classes. For a complete list of
Academic policies and Students Rights and Responsibilities, please see the current catalog.
Academic Integrity - Participation in Pacific Oaks courses assumes that each student has read
and understands the Academic Integrity requirements of Pacific Oaks College. If you have
questions about what constitutes Academic Integrity, please contact your instructor, advisor or
academic director.
Confidentiality - Classes at Pacific Oaks are interactive, drawing on the rich experiences of
faculty and students alike. Often in the course of these discussions, information of a personal or
potentially damaging nature is shared. It is the expectation of the college that such information
will remain confidential, allowing all to share freely without fear of disclosure outside the
classroom. Breaches of confidentiality damage the building of community and trust and are not
acceptable.
Students with Disabilities - Any student in this course who has a disability that might prevent
him/her from fully demonstrating his/her abilities should contact the Director of the CARE
center (pmeda@pacificoaks.edu) immediately to discuss disability verification and
accommodations that may be necessary to ensure full class participation and completion of
course requirements.
Narrative Evaluation Grading - Pacific Oaks views goal-setting and evaluation as part of a shared
learning process, in which instructors and students are both actively involved. Evaluation is by
written statement in which the instructor and student have had direct input. The narrative
evaluation is also converted into a letter grade equivalent to meet financial aid and transfer
requirements. Both the narrative evaluation and the grade become part of the students transcript.
Letter Grades (A, B, C) - An overall grade for the course is determined based on the narrative
evaluation (see above) when a student has successfully completed all class requirements. Note: a
cumulative 3.0 GPA is requiremed to maintain Satisfactory Academic Progress standing at the
MA level.
Incomplete (I) - An Incomplete enables a student who has completed a substantial amount of
work for a class to satisfy the remaining requirements for passing that class within a specific
time and according to specific requirements determined by the class instructor. Students have up
to one month prior to the end of the semester following the term in which an Incomplete was
given (until the end of April or November) to submit any written work required to satisfy the
completion of the class. If the Incomplete requirements are not satisfied by the end of the
semester following the term in which the I was assigned, a grade of No Credit (X) will be
given.
No Credit (X) - Students will receive a No Credit when: they have received an Incomplete and
the contract period has elapsed without successful completion of the contracted work, or, the
instructor determines that an Incomplete is not warranted. In both instances full payment for the
class is required. To receive credit for the class, it will be necessary to register and pay for the
class again. Students should check with their Financial Aid counselor to determine Financial Aid
eligibility for retaking the course.
Withdrawal (W) - Students will receive a Withdrawal if they drop a course after the add/drop
deadline. The tuition of the course will still be charged to students accounts and the students
will be allowed to keep all financial aid funds that have been previously credited to their
accounts. Students should check with their Financial Aid counselor to determine Financial Aid
eligibility for retaking the course.
Work in Progress (WP) - Work in Progress is given when a student is enrolled in a Masters
Project which extends beyond one semester.
The syllabus page shows a table-oriented view of the course schedule, and the basics of course
grading. You can add any other comments, notes, or thoughts you have about the course
structure, course policies or anything else.
To add some comments, click the "Edit Syllabus Description" link to the right.
Top of Form
?
put
Q40loHCY0DWZC
Date
Mon Jun 29, 2015
Tue Jun 30, 2015
Sun Jul 5, 2015
Mon Jul 6, 2015
Tue Jul 7, 2015
Sun Jul 12, 2015
Mon Jul 13, 2015
Tue Jul 14, 2015
Sun Jul 19, 2015
Mon Jul 20, 2015
Tue Jul 21, 2015
Sun Jul 26, 2015
Mon Jul 27, 2015
Tue Jul 28, 2015
Details
Module 1 - Check-in
due by 9:59pm
Discussion 1 - Do the Math
due by 9:59pm
Written Assignment 1
due by 9:59pm
Module 2 - Check-in
due by 9:59pm
Discussion 2.1 - Fears About Death
due by 9:59pm
Discussion 2.2 - Death and Dying
due by 9:59pm
Discussion 2.3 - Tuesdays With Morrie
due by 9:59pm
Written Assignment 2.1
due by 9:59pm
Written Assignment 2.2
due by 9:59pm
Module 3 - Check-in
due by 9:59pm
Discussion 3.1 - Human Development Dynamics
due by 9:59pm
3.2 Life Review Project
due by 11:59pm
Written Assignment 3
due by 9:59pm
Module 4 - Check-in
due by 9:59pm
Discussion 4.2 - 'Life Review' Project Progress
due by 9:59pm
Written Assignment 4
due by 9:59pm
Module 5 - Check-in
due by 9:59pm
Discussion 5.1 - Realities, Sex, Drugs, and Rock and
due by
Date
Sun Aug 2, 2015
Mon Aug 3, 2015
Tue Aug 4, 2015
Sun Aug 9, 2015
Mon Aug 10, 2015
Tue Aug 11, 2015
Sun Aug 16, 2015
Details
Roll
9:59pm
Week 5 - Life Review Project/Paper
due by 11:59pm
Module 6 - Check-in
due by 9:59pm
Discussion 6.1 - What Needs to Change?
due by 9:59pm
Discussion 6.2 - Another Country
due by 9:59pm
Theory Paper
due by 9:59pm
Module 7 - Check-in
due by 9:59pm
Discussion 7.1 - Reflection and Review
due by 9:59pm
Discussion 7.2 - 'Life Review' Sharing
due by 9:59pm
Life Review Paper
due by 9:59pm
Self-Evaluation
due by 9:59pm
Discussion 4.1 - Legacy and How to Say It to Seniors
Discussion 5.2 - 'Life Review' Project Progress
December 2015
12
29
6
13
20
27
3
30
7
14
21
28
4
1
8
15
22
29
5
2
9
16
23
30
6
3
10
17
24
31
7
4
11
18
25
1
8
Wiki Pages
APA Style Resources
Course Files
5
12
19
26
2
9
Theory Paper
Written Assignment 1
Written Assignment 2.1
Written Assignment 2.2
Written Assignment 3
Written Assignment 4
Assignments
Assignment List
3.2 Life Review Project
Discussion 1 - Do the Math
Discussion 2.1 - Fears About Death
Discussion 2.2 - Death and Dying
Discussion 2.3 - Tuesdays With Morrie
Discussion 3.1 - Human Development Dynamics
Discussion 4.1 - Legacy and How to Say It to Seniors
Discussion 4.2 - 'Life Review' Project Progress
Discussion 5.1 - Realities, Sex, Drugs, and Rock and Roll
Discussion 5.2 - 'Life Review' Project Progress
Discussion 6.1 - What Needs to Change?
Discussion 6.2 - Another Country
Discussion 7.1 - Reflection and Review
Discussion 7.2 - 'Life Review' Sharing
Life Review Paper
Module 1 - Check-in
Module 2 - Check-in
Module 3 - Check-in
Module 4 - Check-in
Module 5 - Check-in
Module 6 - Check-in
Module 7 - Check-in
Self-Evaluation
Theory Paper
Week 5 - Life Review Project/Paper
Written Assignment 1
Written Assignment 2.1
Written Assignment 2.2
Written Assignment 3
Written Assignment 4
Quizzes
Quiz List
Module 3 - Self-Eval & Feedback
Module 6 - Self-Eval & Feedback
Module 2 - Self-Eval & Feedback
Module 1 - Self-Eval & Feedback
Module 5 - Self-Eval & Feedback
Module 7 - Self-Eval & Feedback
0 more to upload
{{ display_name }}