Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Albertina Lindsey -2
Albertina Lindsey -3
in our bodies. It contains sugars, fats, and proteins. Sugars, fats, and proteins are considered
carbohydrates, a combination of the chemical elements of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. When
we eat these foods, the foods digest in our stomachs, breaking the bonds between the chemical
elements in the food. When the bonds are broken, a chemical reaction will occur, where new
compounds are created. Our bodies will either produce fats from the carbohydrates to store
energy, or our bodies will metabolize the energy from the carbohydrates.
Albertina Lindsey -4
Interviewee profile
Grade Level:
7th Grade
Age:
12
Language status:
Gender:
Male
Staying focus-The activity engages the student in which the student will observe the
chemical reactions between the vinegar and the egg, and the activity is hands-on.
Completing task-This task will be seen as cool because the eggshell will dissolve and
can be played with as a bouncing ball. Because of this tasks outcome, the student will
want to complete it.
Albertina Lindsey -5
Cooperating with teachers and getting along with peers- Student will actively engage in
the task and have the opportunity to work with another peer, which the classroom teacher
doesnt incorporate often. Student will be cooperative and will seek help from a peer and
teacher when needed. Student will appropriately help his other peer as well, when
needed.
Self-control-Because the experiment is hands-on, can be exciting, is a group effort, and
may cause conflict between the student and his partner, the student will express his
and himself.
Energy- The concept of energy and the task at hand is aligned with Hawaii State Content
Standards in 7th grade Science, Strand 1: The Scientific Process, Standard 7.1.1-7.1.3.
Albertina Lindsey -6
1 egg
1 bottle of white vinegar
1 plastic container
1 egg submerged in vinegar for three days
1 image of an egg submerged in vinegar after day 2
1 copy of the different images of the task (images can be displayed on a
SMART board or just simply showing it to the students during active
processing.)
1 observation worksheet
Task:
The student will observe three eggs that were submerged in vinegar over the course of
three days. Container one includes an egg in which the student will submerge in vinegar himself
and observe chemical reactions occurring within the first several minutes. Container 2 includes a
three-day-old egg in which the teacher submerged in vinegar three days prior to introducing the
task. An image of the teachers egg submerged in vinegar on day two will be shown. Through
observing the containers of eggs, day twos image of the egg, discussion with teacher, and
playing with the egg in container 3, the student will be able to define and understand the concept
of how chemical energy, a form of potential energy, converts from one form to another through
chemical reactions.
This task requires conceptual thinking because as the egg was submerged in vinegar for
three days, the concept of how energy converts from one form to another through chemical
Albertina Lindsey -7
reactions is abstract. Student will be able to observe chemical reactions, the disintegration of an
eggshell, and the size of the eggs changing, but may have difficulty interpreting the rationale of
it. Through the active process of observing the eggs, the student will explore the concept of
chemical reactions in energy and cognize and recognize its applications.
Instructions:
Review with the class the concept and different forms of energy, and how chemical
reactions convert energy from one form to another. Next, present the task to the class by
showing the students the different images of the task, container 2, and discuss. Split the class (4
students in the class) into two groups. Have students write a hypothesis on the data worksheet.
Then, have students fill container 1 with vinegar and place the egg in the container. Scaffold
with students what theyre observing as the egg was placed in the vinegar for the first few
minutes. Students will discuss and write their observations on the data worksheet. Last, in sub
sequential order, line container 1, the image of day 2, and container 2 on the table. With
interviewee, scaffold, discuss, compare and contrast, the eggs and what has happened. Have
students write a summary of the task on the data worksheet.
Albertina Lindsey -8
Albertina Lindsey -9
of their disabilities, will be able to observe whats happening to the egg yet, may have difficulty
with grasping the concept of energy and the conversion of energies happening. For example,
students will probably explain what they observed by stating, I saw bubblesthe egg got
biggerthe egg shell is gone rather than saying the bubbles and acid of the egg and vinegar
are creating water.
3. Direct Modeling
The teacher will initially show the students pictures of the component parts of the
activity. Students will then conduct their own experiment, observing their egg as it is placed in
the vinegar and compare and contrast it to the other eggs. As a group, the students will conclude
their own understanding of the different forms of energies occurring between the eggs and the
vinegar. Physically, the students will convey what theyre thinking through their observations.
Teacher will scaffold activity as well, and will help guide thinking and check for student
understanding.
Focusing on the learner:
This task relates to the learners interests because its bringing the concept of chemical
energy to life. Its realistic and can be easily understood when the concept is explored
collaboratively. Rather than the teacher lecturing, the student will grasp the concept of energy
hands-on. Also, because this student has ADHD, the tasks cognitive load is minimal and the
task will keep the student focus because he will be interested to see the outcome of the task.
Socially, because the class rarely engages in group work, this task will help to enhance the
students relationships with other peers, being he is considered a student who is often bullied. He
will have the opportunity to express himself with another peer and peers will see him in a
different perspective rather than the stupid kid.
Physical development
Being this task is intended for middle school, qualities of physical development that are
necessary for this task are complex thinking processes, looking beyond surface elements,
detecting abstract concepts, and controlling impulses.
vinegar
water
air
dissolve
disintegrate energy
chemicals
bubbles
recycle
carbon dioxide
convert
acid
Describe what you saw: What does the eggs look like? What does the vinegar look
like? What differences do you see in the egg and vinegar??? Size??? Color??? Smell???
What do you think is happening with the eggs and the vinegar?
How did your hypothesis prove to be accurate? Explain. (Include the scientific
process of the task and the different energies observed/discussed.)
Day 2 Image (Egg submerged by teacher prior to task interview)Section III Assessment Plan
Brief Task Description:
The student will observe three eggs that were submerged in vinegar over the course of
three days. Container 1 includes an egg in which the student will submerge in vinegar himself
and observe chemical reactions occurring within the first several minutes. Container 2 includes a
three-day-old egg in which the teacher submerged in vinegar three days prior to introducing the
task. An image of the teachers egg submerged in vinegar on day two will be shown. Through
observing the containers of eggs, day twos image of the egg, and discussion with teacher, the
student will be able to define and understand the concept of chemical energy- how chemical
reactions in energy convert from one form to another.
Low Understanding:
My interviewee demonstrated low understanding by participating in the task, but
minimally completed a hypothesis statement and lacked applications of the scientific
investigation. He provided little or no data and incorrectly identified chemical reactions between
the vinegar and egg, and the rationale of the task. He did not complete the data worksheet or
summary of the task.
Medium Understanding:
My interviewee demonstrated medium understanding by attempting to complete a
hypothesis statement by asking his peers and then making his own hypothesis based on what his
peers shared with him. He would ask questions to his peers and teacher to collect, organize,
detail, and explain the analysis and rationale of the task, but lacked or had missing information in
trying to put the task into perspective. He would communicate what he is seeing-bubbles, egg
enlarging, discoloration of the vinegar and egg, foam- but was more so dependent on the
information from his peers and teacher in completing the task, which typlified medium
understanding.
High Understanding:
My interviewee demonstrated high understanding by accurately completing a hypothesis
statement and scientific investigation by collecting, organizing, and detailing data. He would
explain and show adequate knowledge of the chemical reactions occurring and the concept of
energy to peers and to the teacher, using scientific terms and completing the data worksheets.
For example, When the egg was placed in the container, bubbles were forming. The reactions of
the vinegar and the egg, which are acids, created the bubbles forming carbon dioxide, which
converted to water. And the acid from the vinegar soaks into the egg, causing the egg to get
bigger and become bouncy. Thats how energy works. It converts from one form to another.
This demonstrated high understanding.
In our review of energy and chemical reactions, we discussed the breakdown of food.
How can the rationale of this experiment, as far as chemical reactions which convert
stores energy in our bodies or releases energy. So in the egg, the chemical elements of the
vinegar and egg, started to loosen, break through the shell, causing the shell to disintegrate, like
energy being released in our bodiesthen, whatever chemical elements were stored in the egg, it
caused the egg to expand, like stored energy or fats that we eat and are store in our bodies.
My interviewee was also able to recall the information in this task and relate it to a past
learning experience about teeth. He said, Miss dats like taking care your teethyou no
brush um, da chemicals eat away your teeth and you get cavities. Da vinegar is like the bad stuff
dat make your teeth yellowMiss I know. I did this last year.
My interviewee confirmed his hypothesis, completed the task, and completed the data
worksheet.
Normative Development:
The childs level of understanding is consistent with normative and linguistic
development. Normatively, according to Kholbergs three levels and six stages of moral
reasoning, stage 3: good boy/good girl, the student was participating in the task, making
decisions based on what I think, trying to please others. He was very talkative with me, trying to
maintain a relationship, but kept looking back at his peers in the other group, concerned about
what they may be thinking. To me, he was concerned about my approval as well as his peers,
which is his moral standards. He was thinking abstractly yet reasoned in a pre-conventional
manner.
Linguistically, the student speaks Pidgin. His dialect is consistent with his culture and the
local dialect of the classroom. According to the language development theory of functionalism,
my student used his language, both hereditarily and environmentally, in communicating his
thoughts and making connections. I allowed him to use his language because it was a way for
him to control his own behavior, be comfortable in participating in the task, and to motivate him
to want to complete the task. I geared the task to fit his needs so he wouldnt be discouraged.
Write up/reflection:
Concept
Strengths: I chose to do an interview task on the concept of chemical energy. Initially, I
chose the concept of energy itself because energy is a concept that is abstract, a concept I am
familiar with, and the task I decided to do was relevant to the concept.
Areas of Improvement: Though I had a good sense of the concept of energy, an area of
improvement would be to really know my concept and brainstorm the whole picture before
putting the task, assessment, and field-testing together. In trying to keep my task aligned with the
concept of energy, I had to research more into energy. I found the idea of chemical energy to be
relevant. I knew little about chemical energy, which evolved through completing the task and
assessment assignments.
Task Development
Strengths: I consider my motivation in developing the task to be of strength. Generally,
I think in any teaching situation, teachers need to have that drive to want to do something so the
task will be productive and effective. Developing the task was fun and exciting to do. I enjoyed
putting the task together and testing it before conducting it with my interviewee.
Areas of Improvement: I was so excited to do my task. Just hearing about it from a coworker, it was interesting and I knew right away this is what I wanted to do. However, in trying
to put the task together I realized that my explanation on the concept of energy could not be seen
in my task. So in trying to develop the task, I had to revise it several times to link the task and the
concept. Also, the task itself is meant for a time period between three-four days, but because the
task could only be completed in one day, I had to revise it as well, to fit into a one-day time
frame. So an area of improvement in task development would be to brainstorm and map out my
ideas before jumping the gun and determine the pace of instruction.
Assessment
Strengths: The assessment was aligned with Hawaii State Content Standards in 7th grade
science. The interviewee was given an assessment rubric as to whats expected- low, medium,
and high understanding. Based on the assessment rubric, the interviewee demonstrated high
understanding.
Areas of Improvement: Based on my assessment rubric, under high understanding,
using scientific terms to explain chemical reactions occurring between the egg and vinegar I
would take that out of the assessment. According to Dr. Moseley, 2012, one of the key principles
in assessment is to try and avoid exact textbook language. I think that I was over doing it with
having my interviewee use the correct scientific terminology. He showed his understanding of
the concept with the use of cover terms.
Field Testing
Strengths: My task was hands-on so in field-testing, my interviewee enjoyed the task
and I enjoyed working with him. When the images and the eggs were introduced to the
interviewee, I could tell right away he was intrigued and throughout the task, he was intrinsically
motivated. Usually he will work and participate in his assignments only if he is rewarded
somehow, but through this task, he did it simply because it was fun and of interest to him. Also,
since my task was completed through experiential means, it brought the concept of chemical
energy to life, which my interviewee could visualize the concept, moving from concrete thinking
to abstract thinking.
References: