Professional Documents
Culture Documents
User Input
Calculates Result
Check
Weir
Liquid flowrate to
reboiler
500000.000
1216.545 m3/hr
Coloum Dia
6.000 m
Colm cross A=
28.260 m2
Considering Wier at 70% of crossection
Area available for Reboiler Liq is
ArebLiq-Cross19.782 m2
Residance time in
column sump
Wier Hight
2.000 mins
2.050 m
kg/hr
2.050 m
Liquid Density=
Vapor Density
411.000 kg/m3
42.000 kg/m3
DelP Inlet
Inlet Line Length=
DelPInlet
H1
DelP System=
Result:
Please note that there are two types of thermosyphon reboiler. You have studied a vertical thermosyphon, with boili
I agree with you that the vapourisation ratio should be about 25% on a MASS FLOW basis. I believe that the hydra
0.112
5.000
0.011
35.000
bar/100m
m
bar
% Vapor
Density=
1.500 m
3.550
113.045
100.859
kg/m3
Vertical
Thermos
yphen
h2
h1 7.000
4.950
DelPReb=
0.034
8.500
bar
Density=
Avg Density=
0.150 bar/100m
7.000
411.000
255.929
kg/m3
kg/m3
m
0.011 bar
0.260 m
DelP Avail=
DelP System=
0.069 bar
0.056 bar
H2*DenAvg*g 21340.677
H1*DenL*g 28223.370
255.929
Slope=
C=
-36.487
411.000
vertical thermosyphon, with boiling in the tube side. There is also the horizontal thermosyphon, with boiling in the shell side, whi
designer more flexibility, to use a longer tube bundle and get more area within a given shell diameter.
ation of the reboiler relative to the column
r film coefficient
dependent of the amount of vaporisation.
W basis. I believe that the hydraulic balance can be modelled with both HTRI and HTFS design programs.
ing in the shell side, which in my view is a much better choice than the vertical.