Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
-
ORGANISATIONS
GREENWALD
H.P
2008
-
WHAT
ARE
THE
DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN
A
FORMAL
ORGANISATION
AND
AN
INFORMAL
COLLECTIVITY?
CHARACTERISTIC
DEFINITION
PURPOSE/GOALS
BEHAVIOUR
LEADERSHIP
LONGEVITY
FORMAL ORGANISATION
INFORMAL COLLECTIVITY
BOLMAN
AND
DEAL
2003
BOLMAN
AND
DEAL
IDENTIFY
THREE
COMMON
FALLACIES
USED
WHEN
TRYING
TO
UNDERSTAND
ISSUES
IN
ORGANISATIONS.
WHAT
ARE
THE
THREE
FALLACIES?
AND
WHAT
PROBLEMS
CAN
ARISE
FROM
THEIR
USE?
THREE COMMON FALLACIES USED WHEN TRYING TO UNDERSTAND ISSUES IN ORGANISATIONS:
1. BLAMING PEOPLE
2. BLAMING THE BUREAUCRACY
3. THIRST FOR POWER
While these fallacies are based on partial truth, they often oversimplify a complicated reality, leading to
false sense of clarity and therefore create problems.
1. BLAMING PEOPLE
While blaming people resolves ambiguity, it blinds managers from the larger issue of system failures
and weaknesses
Often has minimal impact to prevent reoccurrence.
Blaming the bureaucracy is seemingly reasonable as organisations are most effective with clear
goals, job descriptions, procedures and rational employees.
However, managers do not often face rational problems, and irrational issues cannot be resolved
through rational means.
Thirst for power within organisations is derived from conflicting motives, and interests.
As a result, political agendas and turf wars often become a barrier for an organisation to achieve a
cohesive and common goal as individuals view others as predators and prey
But there are two ends of the manage spectrum.Managing and management. Managing is a way of
being and relating a continually emerging, embodied practice. Management is a series of disembodied
activities. And balancing the two, I believe is critical: just as it is in the implementation of any philosophy,
system or habit. A leader can spend two much time on facts and details, concrete steps of implementation,
HR policies and procedures and the like. A leader can also overly focus on being philosophic- to the
neglect of proven leadership tools, principles and techniques as taught by the likes of Peter Drucker and
Henry Mintzberg. So maintaining a balance is important. CUNLIFFE 2001
Cunliffes states that there are two ends of the manage spectrum.... That is, managing and
management.
MANAGING: is a way of being the way managers react in different and uncertain situations
This aspect of management is ever-changing and is an embodied practice
This end of the manage spectrum relies on a managers instincts to resolve every day situations
MANAGEMENT: a system of activities which have been proven to work under theoretical situations.
CUNLIFFE argues that a balance between the two is crucial.
Too much time focusing on the facts and concrete strategies may lead to rigidity in management
practice, making it difficult for managers to embrace change and be proactive, while a manager
who is too philosophic may overlook fundamental and proven leadership principles and techniques,
and therefore repeat mistakes and failures committed by previous managers
A balance between the two management spectrum proves important in developing a
management style
Individuals who have low growth needs, are dissatisfied with work context, or have inadequate knowledge
and skills will not experience the positive outcomes predicted by job characteristics theory.
JOB CHARACTERISTICS THEORY: conceptualised as a model of person-environment fit which focuses on
matching the characteristics of jobs to the abilities and needs of jobholders
Specifies the task conditions under which individuals are predicted to prosper in their work
Person- job congruence
Generally, conditions of fit between the person and the environment are predicted to result in high
performance, satisfaction and low stress
A lack of fit is likely to result in decreased performance, dissatisfaction and high stress
When a job is low in motivating potential, it does not offer an opportunity for the three psychological states
to be experienced at work
TOPIC
4:
COMMUNICATION
TEMPORAL SCOPE: the extent to which teams have pasts together and expect to have futures
Key defining feature of teams
FUTURE TEAMS: have little experience as intact teams but anticipate an extended future with fellow team
members (EG: A newly formed project team)
PAST TEAMS: have numerous past experiences with fellow team members, yet anticipate little future
interaction with those members (EG: Project teams nearing the completion of a project)
TEMPORARY TEAMS: temporary in nature, wherein members have no prior experience and expect no future
interaction (EG: Temporary ad hoc teams)
VIRTUAL TEAMS: meet through electronic media
Virtual teams might vary according to the extent that their communication is synchronous versus
asynchronous or collated in time
Social/contextual factors affect how team members perceive and use communication media
Experience can enable virtual teams to overcome the limitations of electronic media, such as
nonverbal cues available in face-to-face teams
Channel expansion theory suggests that communication media will provide opportunities for more
meaningful communication as communication partners gain knowledge-building-experience with
the media, the task, the context and each other
These knowledge-building experiences narrow the differences between face-to-face and
computer-mediated communication by enriching the lean electronic media
Temporal scope matters only if it alters the way that teams utilise media and that utilization affects
team processes and performance
Able to communicate more effectively than ad hoc teams who have no prior history and do not
perceive opportunities for future interaction
Experience expands a teams capacity for effective communication by ensuring that members
have similar understanding of technology, task execution, team interaction and member
knowledge, skills and abilities
Knowledge about members personalities, abilities and behavioural tendencies enable teams to
efficiently allocate resources, assign roles and anticipate the actions of team members
Experienced teams are more likely to have a shared vision of objectives and plans, exhibit greater
coordination and teamwork and make more accurate decisions
Enhanced openness/trust and team-member exchange
Number of ideas shared may be reduced in past teams without compromising understanding
Across communication media, past teams will exhibit higher openness/trust and TMX while sharing
les information than ad hoc teams
Likely to exhibit more effective communication than teams without a future (particularly ad hoc)
because future teams will likely be motivated to engage in good faith initial interaction with team
members are they look forward to future knowledge-building opportunities
Motivated to seek information about others in order to reduce uncertainty and experience comfort
actively engage in information-seeking strategies, including self-disclosure and information
sharing, than do others interacting with familiar partners
Team members are more likely to be cooperative and friendlier to one another when they
anticipate a future together
Future teams will exhibit higher openness/trust and TMX compared to ad hoc teams, and share more
information than both ad hoc and past teams
Ad-hoc virtual teams are typically more task focused, impersonal, uninhibited and antisocial
Face-to-face teams tend to exhibit more positive socio-emotional reactions a finding attributed to
the greater social presence and cues available to in face-to-face teams
For past teams, media differences may diminish as knowledge building experiences will enable
past teams to overcome limitations inherent in the media, leading teams communicating through
electronic media to approach the levels of effectiveness found in face-to-face teams
In future teams, the prospect of knowledge-building opportunities should heighten team motivation
to communicate effectively. However, absent knowledge-building experience may cause the
media differences to persist
Ad hoc teams will exhibit a greater degree of openness/trust, TMX and information sharing when
interacting face-to-face than in virtual computer-mediated medium, but these media differences
will diminish for past teams
The impact of teams interaction processes on effectiveness may depend on task interdependence
the extent to which team members are dependent upon each other to get tasks accomplished
When interdependence is high, teams must coordinate to be successful; communication media can
affect a teams ability to coordinate
Communication effectiveness may positively relate to decision- making effectiveness on high
coordination tasks, but be unrelated to decision-making effectiveness on low coordination tasks
Tasks requiring groups to generate ideas, may only require the transmission of specific ideas,
evaluative and emotional connotations about messages and source are not required and are often
considered a hindrance
Tasks requiring groups to negotiate and resolve conflicts may require the transmission of maximally
rich information, including not only facts, but also values, attitudes and affective messages,
expectations, commitments and so on
The relationship between communication effectiveness and decision-making effectiveness is
moderated by task interdependence
Openness/trust, TMX and information sharing will be positively associated with decision-making
effectiveness when task interdependence is high and will be unrelated to decision-making
effectiveness when task interdependence is low
DISCUSSION
However, these differences did not extend to past teams with knowledge-building experiences
virtual teams were able to communicate as effectively as face-to-face teams. However, face-toface teams exhibited higher TMX than ad hoc teams
ADVANTAGES OF CONFLICT:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Conflicts causes problems when it becomes interpersonal disrupts cohesion and trust
amongst team members
The power the leader has over the group, and the way in which this power is exercised,
influences the effectiveness of group conflict
When leaders are heavy-handed in exercising their power over the group, this can lead group
members to react with increased conflict with the leader, and create a lack of psychological
safety that more broadly disrupts group outcomes
SOURCE OF CONFLICTS
1. Differences in information between group members, based on their experiences, backgrounds and
skills
2. Differences in interests that require team members to compete for the same scarce resources
3. Result in underlying differences in values
TYPES OF CONFLICT
1. TASK BASED CONFLICT:
Disagreement over ideas or opinions that are related directly to the content of the task or decision
at hand
Can improve decision-making ability and creativity of group members
Become exposed to new ways of thinking and new perspectives from which to view decisions
2. RELATIONSHIP CONFLICT:
A reflection of interpersonal differences of incompatibilities, and results in negative affect in the
group anger, frustration or annoyance directed at another individual in the group
Produces tension, frustration which interfere with group processes, which disrupts interpersonal
relationships between group members and diverts attention away from the task
3. PROCESS CONFLICT:
When groups disagree over how the task should be accomplished or the processes surrounding how
the group should work together to accomplish the task goal
Exercising power to alleviate conflict poses dilemmas for leaders, since the use of direct power can
also exacerbate conflict
o By creating negative feelings toward the leader
o By causing people to temporarily hide their true opinions
o By disruption group cohesion
Leaders therefore should provide a filtered amount of feedback about group performance; enough
to promote some degree of task conflict but not so much as to promote relationship conflict
ASSUMPTIONS
1. The perspective of the organisations top management is assumed because the functions studied
service to transmit top managements interpretations of the meaning of events throughout the
organisation, they generate commitment to their practices and policies, they help them control
behaviour in accordance with their objectives
2. The functions of culture are portrayed as integrative, unifying and diverse elements of an
organisation
3. Organisational culture is treated as a monolithic phenomenon one culture to a setting
Culture can be managed by using direct intentional actions not unlike those used in other management
tasks
Basic assumptions
Values
Ideology
Artifacts (such as special jargon, stories, rituals, dress and dcor)
Value added in most businesses today is in the form of knowledge, not stuff
Organisational knowledge is becoming the true source of competitive advantage
Organisations that are unable to engage individual employees in sharing and exploiting tacit
knowledge place themselves at long-term competitive risk
Actively managing knowledge relies on individuals effort and co-operation, so the new model of
knowledge management is about personal relevance
Managerial success and subsequent organisational advancement is determined by how power is
perceived, but occasionally it is recognised that power has been, and still is, a negative force in many
organisations
These behavioural skills and traits evolve out of the context of history of the organisation and their impact is
conditioned by the subjective perceptions
Like influence, power involves human relationships among leaders and employees
CONCLUSIONS
Expert power has a significant impact on the majority of knowledge acquisition attributes
Coercive and referent powers are more likely to negatively influence employees knowledge
acquisition and knowledge sharing
Management dimension of credibility has a positive and significant impact on the knowledge
acquisition attributes of control and negotiation
Self-management kind of leadership and the credibility of the leader encourages and facilitates the
behavioural skills and traits of KWs that are essential to knowledge acquisition and knowledge
sharing
It is therefore, the credibility and integrity of the leader and the self-management leadership style
that has clear vision and conscious knowledge strategy if the enterprise is to take advantage of the
available knowledge in impacting efficiency, effectiveness, productivity and competitive position
Organisations can only strive to provide the extension knowledge acquisition and knowledge
sharing
Managers and leaders must act with integrity, speak from a strong base on knowledge, and deliver
messages with confidence and enthusiasm if they wish to translate their words into a knowledge
organisation
TOPIC
8:
LEADERSHIP
CONSIDERATION: the degree to which a leader shows concern and respect for followers, looks out for their
welfare and expresses appreciation and support
INITIATING STRUCTURE: is the degree to which a leader defines and organises his role and the roles of
followers, is oriented toward goal attainment and establishes well-defined patterns and channels of
communication
The relative importance of specific forms of Consideration and Initiating structure varies from situation to
situation. These situational moderators include:
Subordinate factors: EG: Follower job knowledge
Supervisor factors: EG: Upward influence
Task factors: EG: Autonomy
Path-goal theory was based on the premise that factors moderate and mediate the effect of Consideration
and Structure on outcomes
Consideration exhibited stronger relationships with the criteria than did initiating structure.
Consideration exhibited strong relationship with follower satisfaction
Initiating Structure did have slightly stronger relations with group-organisation performance
Consideration was linked to leader job performance and group-organisation performance
Initiating structure was linked to leader satisfaction
Both behaviours were linked to follower motivation and leader effectiveness, with Consideration
being more important
The validity of Consideration was significantly stronger
Higher social desirably component to Consideration
Consideration and initiating structure have important main effects on numerous criteria that are
fundamental indicators of effective leadership
Principle of Span of control a mans available energy, knowledge, time and abilities are confined to
narrow limits, h is unable to supervise the work of more than a few subordinates successfully
However, critics have argued that when the number of subordinates assigned to an executive is
limited to is very few leads to a tall organisation by increasing the number of supervisory levels and
supervisors increases costs and communication problems
TALL STRUCTURE
FLAT STRUCTURE
COMPETITIVE
STRATEGIES
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE: ability to capture control of strategic behaviour in the industries in which a firm
competes
To the extent one company gains the initiative, competitors are obliged to respond and thereby
play a REACTIVE rather than PROACTIVE role
To the extent a firm gains an advantage difficult for competitors to remove, it stays in control longer
and therefore should be more effective
Innovation may originate as a deliberate and official decision of the highest levels of management
or there may be a more-or-less spontaneous creation of mid-level people who take the initiative to
solve a problem in new ways or to develop a proposal for change
Therefore, management needs:
o A high degree of creative behaviour
o A longer-term focus
o A relatively high level of cooperative, interdependent behaviour
o A moderate degree of concern for quality
o A moderate concern for quantity
o An equal degree of concern for process and results
o A greater degree to risk taking
o High tolerance of ambiguity and unpredictability
The innovation strategy has significant implications for HRM. Rather than emphasising management people
so they work HARDER (cost reduction strategy) or SMARTER (Quality strategy) on the same products or
services, the innovation strategy requires people to work DIFFERENTLY
o
o
o
Cost reduction can also be pursued through increased use of part time employees, subcontractors, work
simplification and measurement procedures, automation, work rule changes, and job assignment flexibility
Organisations that commit to CSR typically adopt sustainable development goals that take account
of economic social and environmental impacts in the way they operate
If a firm projects itself as being socially responsible, and avoids embarrassing exposures of
malpractice, it can deepen and strengthen its reputational capital and pre-empt two forms of risk
Avoids short-term reputational risk related to exposure of a firms malpractice which often carries
financial sanctions
NGOs
CORPORATE
GREENING
CORPORATE GREENING: a process that involves trying to adopt green principles and practices in as many
facets of the business as it is possible to do so
Sustainable production is equivalent to more efficient production
Inputs that are not wasted and processes that do not provide outputs that have to be scrapped are
both ecologically and economically rational
Corporate greening could involve green production that uses less energy, green materials that
recycle and aim for zero waste, green transportation
Marketing could point to the green benefits of the product and the processes taken to produce it,
and not be wasteful of paper or other resources
Could report the widespread use of environmental management systems and standards to structure
organisational processes and behaviour and the use of green accounting standards that as a part
of their triple bottom line report on the environmental impact of the company or organisation
Tight regulatory regime limiting the opportunities for businesses simply to dump their externalities in
an environment
LEARNING
TO
BE
GREEN
Organisations cannot be green if those within them do not adopt green behaviours across the board
Turning off the lights, turning down the heater, using windows to cool a room, walking or cycling to
work small things make a big difference
LEARNING TO BE GREEN: We can learn to be green and the organisations we work for can be crucibles for
green learning
1. LIFELONG LEARNING: ensuring that the organisation really is a learning organisation, constantly trying
to find not only new ways of doing the same things better (single loop learning) but also new things
to do in innovative ways (double loop learning)
2. DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS: helping organisation members gain confidence in critical
reflection on existing ways of doing things and encouraging them to voice their opinions as to how
things might be done better, developing future-oriented scenarios that are more sustainable
3. BUILDING CITIZENSHIP CAPABILITIES: encouraging employees to think not just as employees in terms
of the firm benefit but as concerned citizens desirous of reducing the overall ecological footprint of
not only the organisations they work for and with, but also the impact that they make in their daily
lives
4. FOSTERING ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY: encouraging people to learn about specific environmental
problems and solutions, their causes, consequences and connectedness
5. NATURING ECOLOGICAL WISDOM: sharing an eco-centered understanding of the web of life
Three things need to come together to build green learning in organisations: the creation of a public
sphere; the development of communicative rationality, and discursive design.
There are no simple or easy recipes telling managers how to manage ethically they have to be acutely
aware of the necessity to manage ethics in practice
Managing ethics implies dealing with paradoxes, ambiguities, and trade-offs rather than being a simple
and easy matter of applying clear rules to identifiable cases