Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GUIDE ON
Hedgerow Harvesting Machinery
and Methods
inhoud
1. Introduction..............................................................................................................................1
1.1. Target audience............................................................................................................1
2. Woods versus hedges..............................................................................................................2
3. Hedgerow harvesting machinery and methods......................................................................3
3.1. Harvesting, felling or coppicing hedgerows.................................................................3
3.2. S
tockpiling and transporting the hedgerow material..................................................5
3.3. Processing the hedgerow material by chipping ..........................................................5
3.4. Transport......................................................................................................................7
3.5. Storage and drying.......................................................................................................7
3.6. F
urther processing of hedgerow woodchip ...............................................................11
4. TWECOM Hedgerow harvesting machinery trials.................................................................12
4.1. C
ase study: Roadside hedgerow tree harvesting in Bocholt.....................................12
4.2. C
ase study: Harvesting timber from landscape elements in Limburg Province ......15
4.3. C
ase study: Dyke-side alder row harvesting in West Flanders.................................15
5. Post-harvest hedgerow care.................................................................................................19
5.1. Gapping up hedgerows...............................................................................................19
5.2. Hedgerow tree development......................................................................................19
6. Conclusions............................................................................................................................20
1. INTRODUCTION
This best practice guide describes the experiences
gained through the TWECOM Hedgerow Woodfuel
Project, which has researched the feasibility of
harvesting woodfuel from hedgerows. Through this
project, we have looked to optimise the logistics of
the whole harvesting process, from felling trees
and coppicing hedges, finding suitable places to
store and dry woodchip, right through to burning
the hedgerow woodchip in a woodfuel boiler. In
order to optimise every stage in the process, you
need to consider the hedge and your situation.
You need to choose the right machine which is
appropriate for harvesting or coppicing the type of
hedge you have, the scale at which you are going to
harvest, and the type of woodfuel boiler to match
the woodchip you are going to produce.
the techniques that can be used to produce woodchip for bioenergy from hedges. There is already a
lot of information and research on the use of woody
biomass for energy production, however most of
this is based on experience gained from harvesting
timber from woodlands. Then the harvesting and
processing machines chosen for the Bocholt pilot
area and the experiences gained in working with
these machines are discussed. The harvesting of
black alder rows by Inagro from West Flanders
in Belgium is then discussed. The experiences,
results and recommendations which came out of
the hedgerow harvesting machinery trials carried
out in the UK by The Organic Research Centre
can be found at http:tinyurl.com/TWECOM. The
aftercare of coppiced hedges is considered at the
end of this guide.
agrobeheercentrum Eco2
ABC ECO2
agrobeheercentrum Eco2
3. HEDGEROW HARVESTING
MACHINERY AND METHODS
There are several different stages involved in
the process of going from a hedge to a building
that is heated with wood chips. For every stage
in the process, there are several different types
of machines available. In order to make the best
choice of machine for your specific situation, this
guide aims to give an overview of those that are
available.
3.1.1. CHAINSAW
Cutting mechanism
O.R.C.
Figure 3. Felling head with integral chainsaw cutting bar, similar to the Mecanil
XG220 energy wood head (www.mecanil.fi).
agrobeheercentrum Eco2
ABC ECO2
Figure 5. Felling head with hydraulic tree shears, a Westtech Woodcracker C350
Figure 4. Felling head with integral circular saw, the Bracke Forest C16.c
agrobeheercentrum Eco2
Stabilisation function
Some felling heads are able to hold the felled tree
upright and can then lay it down where desired.
This stabilisation function is only found in the
larger felling heads which are strong enough to
have full control over the direction of the felled
tree, such as the Westtech Woodcracker C550. In
forestry work it is often not necessary to have this
level of control, but with hedgerow work it can be
very useful, especially where space is limited so
that the tree can be laid down in another location
some distance away. Additionally when a tree is
laid down in a controlled manner there are fewer
broken branches to clear up from the fields as
compared to when trees are felled.
Accumulator function
All felling heads have at least one pair of arms
to hold the felled tree, however the larger felling
heads such as the Westtech Woodcracker C550 or
the Bracke Forest C16.c are generally equipped
with at least two pairs of arms which provide the
accumulator or feller-buncher function, enabling
a single felled stem to be held while grabbing and
holding more stems to be cut, before the whole
bundle of hedgerow material is set down. In some
cases this mechanism can be a real time saving
device, particularly when the trees need to be set
down in a different location from where they were
felled. However the various sets of arms take time
to open and close, so that sometimes it is faster to
just move the trees one by one.
agrobeheercentrum Eco2
3.3.1. SHREDDER
A shredder tears and splits the branches lengthwise. This produces fibrous long strips instead of
chunks or chips. This processing method is not
usually recommended for small-scale woodfuel
boilers, but is more appropriate when the shredded
timber is going to be composted.
ABC ECO2
agrobeheercentrum Eco2
ABC ECO2
Figure 8. The drum chipper is hidden behind the green hooklift bin, but the
13m integral woodchip hopper is being emptied into the 40m tractor-towed
hooklift bin.
ABC ECO2
3.4. TRANSPORT
agrobeheercentrum Eco2
ABC ECO2
Figure 10. Woodchip being force dried in a hooklift bin container (left), and in a
concrete walled bay with a central air duct, (right)
agrobeheercentrum Eco2
INAGRO
ABC ECO2
INAGRO
INAGRO
agrobeheercentrum Eco2
% Droge stof
23 /02
Figure 12: This graph represents the woodchip drying process over time,
and shows the average rate of drying of the woodchip for the three drying
methods. Percentage dry matter is shown on the y axis and the woodchip
moisture content sampling dates are shown on the x axis.
In a barn
In a container with
a fan
ADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGES
High investment
costs (3.5x more than
TOPTEX)
Lots of fungal spores
and mould
High investment
costs (4x more than
TOPTEX)
10 agrobeheercentrum Eco2
ABC ECO2
Oversize
>50mm
Nice woodchip
50mm-20mm
Fines
<20mm
Total
percentage (%)
2.5
80
68.0
35
29.5
118
100.0
agrobeheercentrum Eco2 11
BENNY VANGANSEWINKEL
Figure 14. A hedge-rich landscape in the Bocholt district of Limburg for which a
landscape-scale hedgerow vision plan has been produced by Regionaal Landschap Lage Kempen (RLLK).
12 agrobeheercentrum Eco2
Landschap Lage Kempen (RLLK), a regional landscape organisation in Flanders, and is supported
by all the relevant stakeholders. As part of this
trial, all the necessary felling licences and permissions have been applied for at a landscape scale.
ABC ECO2
ABC ECO2
Figure 15. A 16 tonne wheeled excavator with Westtech Woodcracker C350 tree
shears felling head
Figure 17. An Ufkes Greentec VC 942-13 crane-fed drum chipper with integral
woodchip hopper
agrobeheercentrum Eco2 13
After two months, so by May the rest of the woodchip pile was sufficiently well dry at 25% and the
heap was covered with a breathable Toptex cover.
ABC ECO2
55% vocht
29% vocht
20% vocht
14 agrobeheercentrum Eco2
hours chipping
2.79
tonne/hour chipping
36.5
hours harvesting
3.29
tonne/hour harvesting
14.5
hours transporting
8.28
tonne/hour transporting
The production cost (felling, chipping and transporting) of fresh hedgerow woodchip was approximately 55/tonne or 39.60/tonne. This production
cost increases to 77/tonne or 55.44/tonne when
the woodchip is dried to 30% moisture content, not
taking into account any dry matter losses
Table4. Hedgerow woodchip yield and production costs in Bocholt from trials in 2014 and 2015.
Hedgerow length (m)
1700
99.0
58.2
2050
120.9
59.0
2.86 &2.05
Table5. Breakdown of hedgerow woodchip production costs in Euros in Bocholt from trials in 2014 and 2015
Total production cost (/tonne)
Harvesting cost
(/tonne)
Transport cost
(/tonne)
56.66
21.91
24.14
10.61
52.21
12.62
32.66
6.94
Table6. Breakdown of hedgerow woodchip production costs in Pound sterling in Bocholt from trials in 2014 and 2015
Total production cost (/tonne)
Harvesting cost
(/tonne)
Transport cost
(/tonne)
40.80
15.78
17.38
7.64
37.59
9.09
23.52
5.00
Table7. Breakdown of timber harvesting yield in Limburg Province and production costs in Euros
Woodchip yield
Hedgerow
length (m)
Fresh woodchip
yield (tonne)
Woodchip
yield
(kg/m)
Total woodchip
production cost
(/m)
Total woodchip
production cost
(/tonne)
Harvesting
cost
(/tonne)
Chipping
cost (/
tonne)
Transport
cost
(/tonne)
Transport cost
(% of total
production cost)
40
27.9
698.0
57.30
82.10
24.06
34.25
23.79
29.0
318
22.0
69.1
4.65
67.28
16.69
41.95
8.63
12.8
170.4
148.5
13.58
91.41
26.39
39.00
26.02
28.5
99.0
58.2
3.79
65.15
25.19
27.76
12.20
18.7
1700
2050
120.9
59.0
3.54
60.04
14.51
37.56
7.98
13.3
299
50.4
168.6
19.28
106.14
38.99
47.86
19.29
18.2
459.4
64.76
18.81
27.08
18.87
29.1
Harvesting a plantation
2 hectare
104.5
59.21
18.50
40.70
720
212.5
295.2
14.67
48.81
10.46
28.98
9.37
19.2
1075
314.0
292.1
24.60
83.36
28.03
37.31
18.03
21.6
Total
7349
1581.1
Average
178.9
17.7
72.8
22.2
36.2
16.0
21.2
agrobeheercentrum Eco2 15
West Flanders is a very flat and intensively cultivated area of polder with few hedges or woods,
described here as landscape elements. There are
however lots of rows of the native black or common
alder trees (Alnus glutinosa) which are growing
along the water courses. During the development
of a land consolidation plan in Lo-Reninge
and Woesten districts eight years ago, a lot of
consideration was given to the management and
maintenance of existing small landscape elements,
as well as to the planting and management of new
ones such as the alder rows. At this time, about
5.5km of new alder rows were planted alongside
drainage ditches and field margins across the
area. These trees are now approximately8 years
old,1.5m apart, 8m high and 12-15cm in diameter.
As the alder trees had started to shade farmers
crops, a management regime was required to
cut them back to prevent shading the adjacent
fields. The plan was to introduce a coppice rotation
management system and harvest these rows of
alder trees on an eight to twelve year cycle. Once
these single-stemmed trees have been felled in the
initial round of management, they will grow back
as multi-stemmed alder coppice.
2017
1,5 km
2021
1,5 km
2015
1,2 km
2019
1,3 km
16 agrobeheercentrum Eco2
INAGRO
INAGRO
Figure 21. Whole-tree alder row material being chipped using a crane-fed drum
chipper.
The resultant woodchip being force dried with fans in a grain store container.
agrobeheercentrum Eco2 17
18 agrobeheercentrum Eco2
INAGRO
agrobeheercentrum Eco2 19
BENNY
Figure 24. Coppice regrowth from a roadside hedgerow in the Bocholt district of
North Limburg in Belgium.
6. CONCLUSIONS
The TWECOM Project provided the opportunity to
thoroughly research the management, harvest and
ongoing maintenance of hedgerows for woodfuel
energy, and to look in depth at the specific challenges that this entails. Although many research
papers have been written on the harvesting of wood
for energy, they rarely go into any depth regarding
the management of hedgerows for woodfuel. In particular, very little seems to have been written about
the holistic approach to hedgerow management
developed through TWECOM, which considers both
the economic and the ecological considerations.
This project shows that hedgerow management for
woodfuel only fully covers the woodchip production
costs under very favourable circumstances. This is
particularly the case when the price of traditional
fossil fuels is low. This type of hedgerow management may be economically marginal, but it is
important that hedgerow owners are not deterred
from engaging with hedgerow management. The
additional landscape and biodiversity benefits are
significant, and need to be taken into consideration
when assessing the merits of reinstating an active
hedgerow management system. .
The alder row harvesting trials in West Flanders
demonstrate that when you have the opportunity to
plant completely new hedges in good accessible lo-
20 agrobeheercentrum Eco2
For further information on Harvesting hedgerows for woodfuel, please go to the Results section of the
TWECOM website: www.twecom.eu
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This guide has been produced based on the experiences, knowledge and findings gained from hedgerow harvesting machinery trials carried out under the TWECOM Project. These were carried out by
agrobeheercentrum Eco2 and Inagro in Belgium and by The Organic Research Centre in the UK.
This best practice guide has been written by Kathleen Bervoets, agrobeheercentrum Eco Cordinator
and Pieter Verdonckt from Inagro, with contributions from Meg Chambers and Mary Crossland from
The Organic Research Centre, UK. It was translated into English by Meg Chambers. Many thanks to
Benny Vangansewinkel and the farmer-contractors from Agro|aanneming who carried out the hedgerow harvesting work and shared their expertise in making these trials work.
The production of this best practice guide has been possible thanks to funding from INTERREG IVB
NWE through the TWECOM Project and the province of Limburg.
September 2015
Kathleen Bervoets - Cordinator ABC Eco
T. 016 28 64 64 / F. 016 28 64 39