Angela Starks talkshoe Featuring Karl Lentz sho w#189

3min mark if anyone threatens you ie we're going to take your baby away if you don't sign his contract.
That's extortion. ask them to put that in writing and sign it and then you can file a claim against that
person for a trespass ; extortion.
5- a pick up order is a Court order. No one can take your property without adjudication.
Adjudication
ADJUDICA'TION, noun
1. The act of adjudging; the act or process of trying and determining judicially; as a ship was taken and
sent into port for adjudication
2. A judicial sentence; judgment or decision of a court.
Whose families were parties to some of the former adjudications.
3. In Scots law, an action by which a creditor attaches the heritable estate of his debtor, or his debtor's
heir, in payment or security of his debt; or an action by which the holder of an heritable right, laboring
under a defect in point of form, may supply that defect.

7- There's only two ways you can Evoke jurisdiction over a party either we were committed with a crime
And convicted Or we signed a contract

8- Preponderance of Evidence
A standard of proof that must be met by a plaintiff if he or she is to win a civil action.
Administrative law preponderance of evidence is 51% in favor of the state

12- If you have a 3 billion dollar loss is in play and the wrongdoer offers you 1 million dollars to settle
Conditionally accept the offer But that does not negate The fact that there is an outstanding balance
Between us

13- Making a wish in a courtroom is very powerful if you have a claim for a million dollars in damages and
they offer you half million and you take it your entire claim will be seen as a fraud .The reason being if you
make a claim to be complete would cost a million dollars and you go back on your word That means you
made a false claim And then every part of you claim gets thrown out and dismissed

15- Attorneys like to use the word reasonable That's how they get you to move an inch from your word
don't move an inch stand your ground and forget reasonable it black and white Your word is your bond If
they can move you one iota of your belief For your pedestal or you're standing Your whole claim can be
thrown out the window so stick to your guns and your word So stand on it

15-void order..
It is the order of court:
that the STATE OF ALABAMAs Court Case,
stylized as: JU-2001-51832 is to be made known to
the world as, Void from the beginning, and all of it subsequent
orders are to have no force of operation

16- Deemed is a legalese world Don't use it

Pro se is legalese..We don't know what it means and it diminishes your standing

17- Aggrieved
AGGRIE'VED, participle passive Pained; afflicted, civilly or politically oppressed.

aggrieved (adj.)
"injured or wronged in one's rights" is from 1580s.

You're being politically oppressed because you're self governing in the state of interfering with the affairs
of you as a man and causing you harm injury or loss Or breach of contract

20- 12B6. is a code that means You failed to submit a claim In which the court can grant relief..If you're
hearing this year in an Administrative Court you need to get over onto the right side of court because you
are on the wrong side of the Court and that's what you notice the court

22.- Trying to approach this in the Administrative Court route and using code is there a dangerous as they
can change the codes anytime they wish
24- The magistrate has an oath of office And he is there to perform a duty They move under Article 6
Clause 3 and he took an oath to uphold the Constitution
That he found by the old and we can hold them to it

24- A man creates the orders and the magistrate is there To stamp order and to have them delivered on to
the other side And the other side has 21 days to To either accept the order or to Appeal the order and
come back and have a common law court of record trial where the jury where the jury will be the judge
They will determine the Fox and the law I do not want and the magistrate to judge anything

25- federal district court are courts of record The court you want to be in

United States District Court is an admin court

26- KL summonsWithin 21 days after service of the summons on you not counting the day you received it..you must
serve on the Prosecutor A verified Answer to the suit Or make your wish Known to the Tribunal That you
want court to try the matters on day 22

if you fail to present a verified answer a judgement by default judgement will be entered into the record
against you and the immediate execution of the orders in this suit will commence on the 22 day..

31- WHEREAS, Article V, Section 113 of the Constitution of Alabama of 1901 establishes that the
supreme executive power of this State shall be vested in a Chief Magistrate who shall be styled the
Governor of the State of Alabama;

The chief magistrate is the governor is only stylized that way as there is no titles of nobility in the United
States of America

32- magistrate from Latin magistrum (see magistrate). Sense of "hotel manager, manager of a dining
room" is from 1890

33 court are free to man...

35 Default judgment means Mean the man just didn't show up They can hold your order in advance or
stay Your order for 7 years Until the man appears All the man come back within 07 years and say I'm
ready to answer these charges.

36.The trick is to get a magistrate to perform his duty under their constitution To secure protect your
property (rights)

37 notice the court in writing by requiring leave of court and a paper and pen ..then write this..
Is there a verified criminal complaint Before this court? if there is verified Can you please stay court for
72 hours So I can compensate the man That I have done wrong Of his injuries and after 72 hours i will be
glad to come back if i could not settle with the man That claims I Injured him .

and stand on your notice and don't budge

and if the judge enters a plea for you..notice him

anyone that enters a plea on my behalf will bares full liability and will also be responsible for pay me
$10,000 a day for everyday that i am held in here until an injured man appears for interfering with my right
to be let alone.

39. Which is a very powerful you will find The word wish all over statutes and codes
http://www.alabamaadministrativecode.state.al.us/docs/hres/660-5-28.pdf

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES SOCIAL SERVICES DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE

CODE

(b) The Department has no authority under a voluntary agreement to hold a child against the parent's
wishes; consequently, the parent has the right at any time to request and to receive his child. Voluntary
agreements are to be accepted only in situations in which the Department would have no hesitancy in
returning the child to his parents

41- https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2010-title42/pdf/USCODE-2010-title42-chap7-subchapIVpartE-sec672.pdf

TITLE 42THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE

(2) Removal and foster care placement requirements The removal and foster care placement of a child
meet the requirements of this paragraph if (A) the removal and foster care placement are in accordance
with (i) a voluntary placement agreement entered into by a parent or legal guardian of the child who is
the relative referred to in paragraph (1); or (ii) a judicial determination to the effect that continuation in the
home from which removed would be contrary to the welfare of the child and that reasonable efforts of the
type described in section 671(a)(15) of this title for a child have been made

45- Properties what is exclusive to a man and no other in that society

46-the State can only take your child if it has been judge before a court

So don't accept the complaint you must get a signed order from a judge when they're coming to take your
property

custody just means security

49 [c.f. blackstone commentaries vol 3 chapter 23 section 378

But in both these instances the jury may, if they think proper, take upon themselves to determine at their
own hazard, the complicated question of fact and law; and, without either special verdict or special cafe,
may find a verdict absolutely either for the plaintiff or defendant p.]

51. if a judge or a magistrate doesnt believe common law exist ask where the law states such a thing?
where are your finds of facts and conclusion that you are relying on to make such a determination?
a court of record is a court which must meet the following
criteria:
1. generally has a seal
2. power to fine or imprison for contempt
3. keeps a record of the proceedings
4. proceeding according to the common law (not statutes or codes)
5. the tribunal (prosecutor, wrongdoer and jury) is independent of the magistrate (judge)

Common law is not a legal system. It is a judicial system. Cases involving "a suit at the common law"
inherently involve judicial determination and must come before Article III courts, that makes all courts
common law courts. [c.f. 59 U.S. 272 (1855) , United States Reports [2]].
https://law.resource.org/pub/us/case/reporter/US/59/59.US.272.html

Common Law is the will of mankind issuing from the life of the people, is an engraving on the United
States Department of Justice building. [1]

Common law is not a legal system. It is a judicial system. Cases involving "a suit at the common law"
inherently involve judicial determination and must come before Article III courts, that makes all courts
common law courts. [c.f. 59 U.S. 272 (1855) , United States Reports [2]].
A court of record only moves under the common law. Courts of record proceed without the use of statutes
and are judicial courts and their final judgments cannot be appealed. (c.f. CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM
vol 25 section 344, Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., p 426. Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 N.E.
688, 689].
The judgment of a court of record whose jurisdiction is final is as conclusive on all the world as the
judgment of this Court would be. It is as conclusive on this Court as on other courts. It puts an end to
inquiry concerning the fact by deciding it. [Ex Parte Watkins, 3 Pet. 202-203. Chief Justice Marshall of the
Supreme Court of the United States (18011835)]
Courts which proceed with the use of statutes ( legal system) are legislative (inferior) courts [c.f. Article III
Section 1. "The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such
inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish..." , Article I section 8 "The
Congress shall have power...To constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court..."]
All federal courts are courts of record [c.f CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM vol 25 section 344] which at
common law not only have the authority to apply or interpret the law, but also the authority to create law if
it does not already exist by act of legislature. This is called case law precedent. Preceding unsigned
comment added by108.70.108.224 (talk) 19:09,

24 May 2015
(UTC)

http://www.bclaws.ca/Recon/document/ID/freeside/00_96379_01

Constitution Act, 1982(1) SCHEDULE B CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 PART I CANADIAN CHARTER
OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
Whereas Canada is founded upon the principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the
rule of law:

The Queen takes Coronation OathPhoto: PA/PA Archive/Press Association Images

Then Archbishop of Canterbury Dr. Geoffrey Fisher presided over the Coronation ceremony. These are
the words of the Coronation Oath in full.
Archbishop of Canterbury: Madam, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath?
Queen Elizabeth II: I am willing.
Archbishop of Canterbury: Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South
Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and the other Territories to any of them belonging
or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs?

King James Bible Online

Acts 25:16

15and when I was at Jerusalem, the chief priests and the elders of the Jews brought charges against
him, asking for a sentence of condemnation against him. 16"I answered them that it is not the custom of
the Romans to hand over any man before the accused meets his accusers face to face and has an
opportunity to make his defense against the charges. 17"So after they had assembled here, I did not
delay, but on the next day took my seat on the tribunal and ordered the man to be brought before me.

John 8 King James Version (KJV)

8 Jesus went unto the mount of Olives.
2 And early in the morning he came again into the temple, and all the people came unto him; and he sat
down, and taught them.
3 And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her
in the midst,
4 They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.
5 Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?
6 This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his
finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not.
7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin
among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
8 And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.
9 And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at
the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.
10 When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are
those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?
11 She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.

i require pen and paper as i only as the court in writing..

write notice

what is the nature of the person whom this court seeks?

Deuteronomy 1

15 So I took the chief of your tribes, wise men, and known, and made them heads over you, captains over
thousands, and captains over hundreds, and captains over fifties, and captains over tens, and officers
among your tribes.

16 And I charged your judges at that time, saying, Hear the causes between your brethren, and judge
righteously between every man and his brother, and the stranger that is with him.
17 Ye shall not respect persons in judgment; but ye shall hear the small as well as the great; ye shall not
be afraid of the face of man; for the judgment is God's: and the cause that is too hard for you, bring it unto
me, and I will hear it.
18 And I commanded you at that time all the things which ye should do.

Judges can't be anonymous...

Regina -v- Felixstowe Justices ex parte Leigh; CA 1987

Posted by dls
References: [1987] 1 QB 582
Coram: Watkins LJ
The court considered the importance of the role played by the media in attending and reporting court

proceedings. Watkins LJ said: The role of the journalist and his importance for the public interest in the
administration of justice has been commented upon on many occasions. No one nowadays surely can
doubt that his presence in court for the purpose of reporting proceedings conducted therein is
indispensable. Without him, how is the public to be informed of how justice is being administered in our
courts? The journalist has been engaged upon this task in much the same way as he performs it today for
well over 150 years. In her work, Justice and Journalism (1974), p. 24, Marjorie Jones, making a study of
the influence of newspaper reporting upon the administration of justice by magistrates, stated, having
referred to a case decided in 1831:
The same ruling that excluded the attorney admitted the newspaper reporter. The journalist entered, and
has remained, in magistrates courts as a member of the public taking notes. The constant presence of
newspaper men in magistrates courts provided not only a record of the proceedings but also a means of
communication with the public. Through newspaper reports magistrates had access to a wider audience
beyond the justice room or the police office. Communication is particularly important for deterrent
sentencing, which requires that potential offenders shall be aware of the punishment they are likely to
incur.
In Dickens time journalists were the only impartial observers who sat regularly in magistrates courts, day
after day, week after week, month after month. In the provinces, particularly, the same reporter might
often cover the local courts for year after year. These men regarded themselves as representing the
absent public. And they were the first to concern themselves with the defence of the defenceless in the
summary courts. Lord Denning in The Road to Justice (1955) stated with regard to the free press:
A newspaper reporter is in every court. He sits through the dullest cases in the Court of Appeal and the
most trivial cases before the magistrates. He says nothing but writes a lot. He notes all that goes on and
makes a fair and accurate report of it. He supplies it for use either in the national press or in the local
press according to the public interest it commands. He is, I verily believe, the watchdog of justice. If he is
to do his work properly and effectively we must hold fast to the principle that every case must be heard
and determined in open court. It must not take place behind locked doors. Every member of the public
must be entitled to report in the public press all that he has seen and heard. The reason for this rule is the
very salutary influence which publicity has for those who work in the light of it. The judge will be careful to
see that the trial is fairly and properly conducted if he realises that any unfairness or impropriety on his
part will be noted by those in court and may be reported in the press. He will be more anxious to give a
correct decision if he knows that his reasons must justify themselves at the bar of public opinion. and
There is . . no such person known to the law as the anonymous JP.
Those observations suffice to emphasise to the mind of anyone the vital significance of the work of the
journalist in reporting court proceedings and, within the bounds of impartiality and fairness, commenting
upon the decisions of judges and justices and their behaviour in and conduct of the proceedings. If
someone in the seat of justice misconducts himself or is worthy of praise, is the public disentitled at the
whim of that person to know his identity?
It must ever be borne in mind that save upon rare occasions when a court is entitled to sit in camera, it
must sit in public. The principle of open justice has been well established for a very long time.

Attorneys can't speak in court...read below

TRINSEY v. PAGLIARO
Civ. A. No. 34873.

229 F.Supp. 647 (1964)

John S. TRINSEY, Jr., v. Frank J. PAGLIARO and Albert Foreman, Esq.
United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.
May 28, 1964.

The defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim unsupported by affidavits or depositions is
incomplete because it requests this Court to consider facts outside the record which have not been
presented in the form required by Rules 12(b) (6) and 56(c). Statements of counsel in their briefs or
argument while enlightening to the Court are not sufficient for purposes of granting a motion to dismiss or
summary judgment.

Corpus Juris Secundum (CJS) in volume 25,section 344

Judiciary Act of 1789 sec 31

The Judiciary Act of 1789

September 24, 1789.
1 Stat. 73.

SEC. 31. And be it [further] enacted, That where any suit shall be depending in any court of the United
States, and either of the parties shall die before final judgment, the executor or administrator of such
deceased party who was plaintiff, petitioner, or defendant, in case the cause of action doth by law survive,
shall have full power to prosecute or defend any such suit or action until final judgment; and the defendant
or defendants are hereby obliged to answer thereto accordingly; and the court before whom such cause
may be depending, is hereby empowered and directed to hear and determine the same, and to render

judgment for or against the executor or administrator, as the case may require. And if such executor or
administrator having been duly served with a scire facias from the office of the clerk of the court where
such suit is depending, twenty days beforehand, shall neglect or refuse to become a party to the suit, the
court may render judgment against the estate of the deceased party, in the same manner as if the
executor or administrator had voluntarily made himself a party to the suit. And the executor or
administrator who shall become a party as aforesaid, shall, upon motion to the court where the suit is
depending, be entitled to a continuance of the same until the next term of the said court. And if there be
two or more plaintiffs or defendants, and one or more of them shall die, if the cause of action shall survive
to the surviving plaintiff or plaintiffs, or against the surviving defendant or defendants, the writ or action
shall not be thereby abated; but such death being suggested upon the record, the action shall proceed at
the suit of the surviving plaintiff or plaintiffs against the surviving defendant or defendants.

i require that i be placed in a common law court that i paid for [cf. claim of conusance]

Conusance
CONUSANCE, CLAIM OF, English law. This is defined to be an intervention by a third person, demanding
judicature in thecause against the plaintiff, who has chosen to commence his action out of claimant's
court. 2 Wilson's R. 409.

2. It is a question of jurisdiction between the two courts Fortesc. R. 157; 5 Vin. Abr. 588; and not
between the plaintiff anddefendant, as in the case of plea to the jurisdiction, and therefore it must be
demanded by the party entitled to conusance, or byhis representative, and not by the defendant or his
attorney. Id. ibid. A plea to the jurisdiction must be pleaded in person, but aclaim of conusance may be
made by attorney. 1 Chit. Pl. 403.
3. There are three sorts of conusance. 1. Tentere placita, which does not oust another court of its
jurisdiction, but onlycreates a concurrent one. 2. Cognitio placitorum, when the plea is commenced in one
court, of which conusance belongs toanother. 3. A conusance of exclusive jurisdiction; as that no other
court shall hold pica, &c. Hard. 509 Bac. Ab. Courts, D.

Claim of Consuance..is when u have a common law suit before the court and they are talking about tax
codegive the man acting as a judge notice to bring it over the the right side of the court

Barratry
BAR'RATRY, noun The practice of exciting and encouraging lawsuits and quarrels.
2. In commerce, any species of cheating or fraud, in a shipmaster, by which the owners or insurers are
injured; as by running away with the ship, sinking or deserting her, by wilful deviation, or by embezzling
the cargo.

Luke 11King James Version (KJV)

44 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are as graves which appear not, and the men
that walk over them are not aware of them.

45 Then answered one of the lawyers, and said unto him, Master, thus saying thou reproachest us also.
46 And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and
ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.
47 Woe unto you! for ye build the sepulchres of the prophets, and your fathers killed them.
48 Truly ye bear witness that ye allow the deeds of your fathers: for they indeed killed them, and ye build
their sepulchres.
49 Therefore also said the wisdom of God, I will send them prophets and apostles, and some of them
they shall slay and persecute:
50 That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from the foundation of the world, may be required
of this generation;
51 From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias which perished between the altar and the temple:
verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation.
52 Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves,
and them that were entering in ye hindered.
53 And as he said these things unto them, the scribes and the Pharisees began to urge him vehemently,
and to provoke him to speak of many things:
54 Laying wait for him, and seeking to catch something out of his mouth, that they might accuse him.

extra goodie -A "minute order" issued by a judge is not part of the record.
The proceedings of the courts of common law are records. But every minute made by a clerk of a court
for his own future guidance in making up his record is not a record. 4 Wash. C.C. 698. See 10 Penn. St.
157; 2 Pick. Mass. 448; 4 N. II. 450; 6 id. 567; 5 Ohio St. 545; 3 Wend. N.Y. 267; 2 Vt. 573; 6 id. 580; 5
Day, Conn. 363; 3 T. B. Monr. Ky. 63.
-Minutes are not considered as any part of the record. 1 Ohio, 268. See 23 Pick. Mass. 184.
Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 14th Ed. (1870)
54 - Because he failed to tell his attorney what to do i seek judgement (cf. nihil dicit judgement is Latin for
"he says nothing"; a judgment for want of a plea. The name of a judgment which a judge may render
against a defendant who failed to plead .)

as opposed to a default judgemnets which can be appealled Because no testimony was taken Under oath
or affirmation In open court

title your notice -- wit a simple notice no judicial notice..no notice court..just notice!!!

55- Do not take the Freeman title is just diminishing man with another adjective

Adjectives are words that describe or modify other words. They can identify or quantify another person or
thing in the sentence.Adjectives are usually positioned before the noun or the pronoun that they modify.
56-Man created government man does not answer the government
If they ask you about your citizenship you asked what does citizenship have to do with Somebody taking
my property ?
Answer with a question
I'm the prosecutor I'm asking the questions Do you have a claim against me? no Well then you're moving
under my rules . That's why you never played defendant as it there case .If you're defending you have to
move under their rules .
When it's your case you determine what's in it and the rules you want.

57 The plaintiff must appear because if they find that you were making a false claim on your brother it was
off of your head. it's an ancient rule
Exodus 20:16Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. King James Version (KJV)

58 -You file a claim against the prosecutor because you don't believe you going to bring the plaintiff to
court . Because they are the moving party the plaintiff must appear .Or as youre filing a false complaint.
If the prosecutor can show you who the plaintiff is call Pam so long as he will put his hand on the Bible
and verify in open court That I injured him. make The state of fear the province of British Columbia
visa/mastercard they must appear.

59 - Be weary of even numbers like $15,000 in damages from landlord or the like...Upon hearing such
round numbers you should be inclined to ask for an itemized Bill of the particulars. Usually you get back
an uneven number like $11,124.76 . You now have them As this extortion and fraud. Even if they were off
by one penny it's extortion and fraud .. Write the Law Firm back when you get this itemized bill and write
thank you for your timely response Now under Under Virginia Code blah blah blah you committed
extortion and under Virginia coal blah blah blah you committed fraud.Because the first bill you sent me
was 15000 and a second bill you sent me was $11,124.76 That's absolute proof beyond a shadow of a
doubt of extortion and fraud in any time you like to take this matter before court In Virginia would be more

than glad To get this before a common law jury Where we will file our own claim for $60,000.Just let us
know

105- And the w2 form that you fill out you write coffee can you give them a copy and you keep the original
This is where you write Exempt and 00 on any other boxes.
109 Sears Asian to write down how much you out and sign it then more than likely won't do that without
putting on that got on the line because if they're wrong they're liable

111-Whoever has your property send them a simple notice that they are in Possession of your
property[child] without lawful right. It is wrong to hold my property In a manner that you are holding it . My
Property [child] Was stolen from me. as no man has come for at any time Before a court of record and
claimed that they had a superior claim to the Possession of my property[child] . Now I moving my claim
And for the immediate and lawful Return of the Possession of my property[child] Is to be placed under my
control I will bring you forth into a court of record and verify my claim
-If they don't return your property you will be charging them a dollar a second until the property has
returned For the unlawful possession of my property[ child]

113.The highest court in the land is a court of record

114- Common law court of record knock out all officers judges included.And I tell you make the judges
just a referee (magistrate) no judges
115 http://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/supreme-court/1995/1941680-1.html

116- Is there any reason that I can't move this in the Camelot Court has I don't understand legal leave I'm
an idiot I don't speak legalese

-There is no Second Amendment only the Bill of Rights article 2

117- If you make a chair you Issued it just like your child is your issue because you Issued it from your
loins ..

118- they can take your property unless there is a Verified criminal complaint On record With the
sheriff's office or the County Prosecutor's Office or a contract ie. signed parental plan

120 - the power of the word wish

The use of the word wish makes the person you're asking a wish of your servant it's a way to remind
government that they are your servants and they are to do your wish

http://www.alabamaadministrativecode.state.al.us/docs/hres/660-5-28.pdf

USCODE-2010-title42-chap7-subchapIV-partE-sec672n

123- http://www.infoplease.com/us/supreme-court/cases/ar09.html

124-Okay so you took my property did you give me just and fair compensation . Now are you going to pay
me or not if not well then you hand them a bill The claim you put in for whatever we call fair and just
compensation is only waiting for a stamp of approval from the the clerk of the court The step seal on it
and if you watch late night TV they buy judgement for pennies on the dollar.
And because we know the holder in due course well they're going to have to go after the guy with got the
judgment that you just sold It to
And after I sell it and you want to retry this And the guy who bought the judgment from me Is going to say
I bought this fair and square on the open market
After we get the judgement sealed by the Clerk of the Court it's our property.

125-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUXjKk-Aq-A Holder in due course rule . sell your judgements

online.

128-A grandmother has a greater claim than a CPS worker to her grand daughter and more then likely 7
out of 11 jurors are going to vote that way.

132- Government cant make you an offer..

Social Security Act 472 (4)

(e) No Federal payment may be made under this part with respect to amounts expended by any State
as foster care maintenance payments under this section, in the case of any child who was removed from
his or her home pursuant to a voluntary placement agreement as described in subsection (a) and has
remained in voluntary placement for a period in excess of 180 days, unless there has been a judicial
determination by a court of competent jurisdiction (within the first 180 days of such placement) to the
effect that such placement is in the best interests of the child.

(f) For the purposes of this part and part B of this title, (1) the term voluntary placement means an outof-home placement of a minor, by or with participation of a State agency, after the parents or guardians of
the minor have requested the assistance of the agency and signed a voluntary placement agreement; and
(2) the term voluntary placement agreement means a written agreement, binding on the parties to the
agreement, between the State agency, any other agency acting on its behalf, and the parents or
guardians of a minor child which specifies, at a minimum, the legal status of the child and the rights and
obligations of the parents or guardians, the child, and the agency while the child is in placement.

(g) In any case where

(1) the placement of a minor child in foster care occurred pursuant to a voluntary placement
agreement entered into by the parents or guardians of such child as provided in subsection (a), and

(2) such parents or guardians request (in such manner and form as the Secretary may prescribe)
that the child be returned to their home or to the home of a relative,

the voluntary placement agreement shall be deemed to be revoked unless the State agency opposes
such request and obtains a judicial determination, by a court of competent jurisdiction, that the return of
the child to such home would be contrary to the childs best interests.

134You can't modify the administrator of course you have to open up your own court. when you going into
the admin court You must realize it's the judges court. What you want to do is you want to go to a court
where a magistrate is serving you and God is your only judge and that is A common law court of record.
You will get your own case number. Go to a federal district court or local circuit court and ask Is this Nisi
Prius court or a full court of record under the common law ; trial by jury (They will direct you where to go) .
dont go to a court of claims
Don't be an ingredient in their case open your own . They may tell you you are filing a claim and I should
be over $10,000 will you tell him your property is worth more than $10,000 to you.
So now that you have your case number go over to for example family court You go to Family Court to
deal with case J13213 yada yada yadaMake sure you file your case with the clerk. Ask the judge if you
got your case Against these people in circuit court Before him(Or whatever you got your court in)

Ask if she wants to hear both matters today Or do you want to meet over at circuit court because
whatever you Rule today is irrelevant Because today we are moving under statutes/code And the
common law Quarter record is superior Whatever administrative ruling you make today it's just a rule it's
just a decision
The Supreme Court does not make orders They make Rules decisions or opinions of the court Is what
they do They have no power to enforce their opinion they have no Marshall or sheriff enforcing it

141 Sometimes it's best to get a bench trial vs a trial by jury because maybe 12 old ladies might not think
your marijuana habit is in the best interest of your children and judge it is a good thing to take your
children away that's why you want a bench trial .Sometimes you want a magistrate to judge the matter
because they know the law .
I will easily recognize that no man has come forward to Verify a claim on your property

143 Someone is accusing you And you stand your ground defending your position against an accusation
the scales of justice have not been tipped a third-party impartial witness to the events would easily tip
the scales of justice

145 Government does not have control over all children in the state it only has jurisdiction and control
over the children placed under their care and custody The court process

146 You don't have to be a citizen every second of your life choose to be a man or citizenM time you so
choose

147 Avoid irrelevant questions like questions like are you a Canadian citizen or a drivers licence?
Reply with what does it mean being a Canadian citizen have to do with anything?

Until there is a another man accusing me of something there is nothing for us to talk about

148

U.S. Constitution: Fifth Amendment

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or
indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in
actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be
twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness
against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private
property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

151 kldirectv2@gmail.com or courtofrecord@gmail.com

152

153 Everything you do must be in writing before you get to court If you speak in open court you're going
to get nailed.
When you get arrested at all the Public defender comes and talks to you in the cage You asked for a
crayon pencil and a piece of paper and you write.
Notice: It's not there's not a verified claim before this court At this time I love this Port to discharge all the
charges against To me immediately And for every second that my rights are interfered with To go home i
will be charging $1. [ The clock is ticking; what is your wish? ]

155 Some of that you owe them $10,000 at the judge for 3 days so you can settle the matter on the
private side. if you don't have Financial dollars to offer the other man well then offer on your physical
labor washing windows instead as this is money... Because the rule of law is if we make an offer even if it
is for washing windows He denies Accepting your offer of payment Of the dead then there is no longer a
day between you

156 I conditionally accept your offer but it does not negate The fact they're still belive that there is a debt
between you and me And this does not satisfy the time But I will accept it (And this is where you counter
offer) And a dollar a day until the rest of the balance is paid in full...

157 Whoever says no, is the one who is bringing controversy to the court.
158. Whenever you make an offer be a man of your word and stick to it and don't budge an inch

200 to the irs ...notice: i believe what you are doing is extortion and fraud ; your trying to claiming that i
owe a debt Which I do not believe I owe Unless some man is going to come and open court and Swear
under oath or affirmation that i owe them money. i will work a settlement with that man if they come
forward; and if you dont cease and desist immediately i am going to open my own case because you are
causing me stress And if I get any more correspondence from you To me I'm going to charge you $10,000
per letter I received from you in the mail for the stress and aggravation.

If there's a man that says I owe them money let them open a common law court of record in front of 12
jury members and maybe they'll find for him

203 I'm Robin Mitchell and I'm here Present me and my case to the court .
I bean aggrieved And it is my wish for this court to create a constructive trust .
Is the weather charge hold the money And the judge will Dispense the money

> point of law is that a man or woman must tell the truth not a person... a person may speak false...
A person is a 2d construct and has no vocal cords it requires a man to utter or type the lies. In effect man
is the CEO of his person and ultimately responsible for its actions.

206 [cf. Nil dicit default judgment

Judgment for the plaintiff after defendant fails to file a timely answerto the complaint.]
207 see previous post way above--- Corpus Juris Secundum (CJS) in volume 25,section 344
Don't go to Tax Court go the federal district court
208- the wrongdoer has their summons and it is going to be done in 21 days On day 22 on a stamp from
this Court On this order and it's done.
209 the US Supreme Court is the highest court of government. [federal district court) common law court
of record is the highest law of the land / people.

judge we dont do the common law anymore..reply with we is not me..where is it written that the
common law has been outlawed? (better not be a code!!!)
Hey judge can This decision be appealed if they say yes then you're definitely on the wrong side of court
because you cant appeal a common law court of record decision..
212 The constitution is there to protect your rights
212 there is an old saying that an honest man should be able to go through his entire life without
signing his name Because once you sign your name to relinquish in certain rights To become someone
else's slave
213. how is its relevant to the matter at hand whether i am have a drivers licence or a citizen?
214.the judge took an oath to up hold the constituion..and article 7 of the bull of rights secures our right to
have a common law court of record..
Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by
jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the
United States, than according to the rules of the common law.[2]
Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others
retained by the people.[1] (this protects our rights from cave man times to go before our peers and face our
accusers)......pin the judges with those two

219
courts are free to the people .. tomlins 4th editions..the image is way above.
223
To the clerk of the court (Debra P. Hackett):
i, write this, for there are many of the land, similarly situated, who have listened to me on a few talkshows,
whom appear to be truly interested and have told me they will be following along with this case to witness the
results, for i, believe i, have chosen a simple method, to move my case through this court i, have chosen to
appear before a federal district court, in the capacity of, a man aggrieved, making simple wishes and
demands, to order the restoration of my rights, and to seek compensation of the declared wrongs;
That being said.
i, now present to this district court of the united states for middle Alabama, my case;
i, as a man, wish and respectfully, demand, ( as You have always been professional and courteous to me in
the past) of this court to: (1) file my suit, and; (2) to give my case an Action Number, and (3) deliver the
enclosed summons to the wrongdoers, (4) please time and/or file stamp my original copy of the suit and
mail it back to my address ( Please see enclosed: Self-Addressed, pre-Stamped envelope ); (5) It is my
wish, to not be charged a fee, and i, do not want to diminish my standing to that of a pauper, i, want my
standing to remain that of a man aggrieved,
i, do not believe, i, have been presented a 'bill' for services rendered;
i, do not believe that at this time, an officer of this court, can claim i, owe this court a debt;
i, DO Believe, that this court was created for the use of man, and those of mankind to settle contentious
matters, in a civil manner, without a fee;
i, declare i, appear before this court, to seek the restoration my rights[1] that are secured and protected by
the 'united states Constitution', and as all of the officers of this court, have bound themselves[2] to the
'Constitution', i, as a man, call upon the officers of this court, to perform their duties;
That being said.
IF the officer of this court, still maintains that i, am in error of my beliefs, i, will accept their beliefs, therefore i,
have enclosed the $350.00 filing fee demanded of me from the clerk of the court, for this matter in controversy
between i, and The Government of the STATE of Alabama, has gone on for too many years already, So please,
just take the $350.00 as i, need this case to MOVE NOW, for once this case is settled, it will allow an 11-year old
boy, of my (and his mother) flesh and blood to be returned to us( Ooh, if You wish to allow me to proceed fee
free please return the $350.oo)
Sincerely;
Karl Lentz, November 8th, 2012

[1] See: The bill of rights of united States Constitution, Articles: VII; IX;
[2] Oath of Office: Article VI clause 3, 'united states Constitution'. U.S. Codes: 5 U.S.C. 1983; 3331, and/or; 28
U.S.C. 543

A little legalese below but you know how to rework this

In general, the presiding judge of any district court is

presumed to have executed the solemn Oath of Office required of
Appellant's Opening Brief: Page 20 of 50
him (her) by Article VI, Clause 3 ("6:3") and by 28 U.S.C. 453.
This Oath is like an on-off light switch in that, per force, its
execution activates all the guarantees in the federal and state
constitutions, without exception. Fiat lux et lux erat in mundo.
This causal connection between those guarantees and a judge's
Oath of Office is tersely expressed as follows:
A district judge is bound by oath of office to uphold the
Constitutions of the United States and the State of Hawaii;
rule excluding illegally seized evidence falls within scope
of such oath as such rule is a sanction essential to
upholding federal and state constitutional safeguards
against unreasonable searches and seizures. State v.
Wilson, 519 P.2d 228 [1974].
[emphasis and year added]
[American Digest System, Eighth Decennial Digest]
["Judges", page 969, Section 5: "Qualifications"]
Therefore, using this elegant logic, all Rights which are
guaranteed by the state and federal constitutions are sanctions
which fall within the scope of the Oath. The guarantee of Due

Process of Law, as found in the Fifth Amendment, is a Right which

is on a par with a multitude of all other Rights guaranteed by
those constitutions, whether or not they are enumerated.
Together, the 9th and 10th Amendments provide explicit guarantees
for that multitude, without any need to enumerate them.

226.If a clerk of the court doesn't allow you to file on demand. the Supreme Court ruling says very clearly
That one must go to the head man of the court or you didnt do enough to protect ur rights..
Don't wash your tablet crooks of the court if they're giving you a hassle Go to the head chief magistrate/
judge..

227 Ex Parte
[Latin, On one side only.] Done by, for, or on the application of oneparty alone.
An ex parte judicial proceeding is conducted for the benefit of onlyone party. Ex parte may also describe
contact with a personrepresented by an attorney, outside the presence of the attorney.The term ex parte
is used in a case name to signify that the suit wasbrought by the person whose name follows the term.

228 It's only man on man no lawyers in a common law court of record

231 Who penned the document That says that I owe a debt ?
if someone making a claim and they're off by one penny it is fraud

232 judge scalia and al gores voters

Finally, neither in this case, nor in its earlier opinion in Palm Beach County Canvassing Bd. v. Harris, 2000
WL 1725434 (Fla., Nov. 21, 2000), did the Florida Supreme Court make any substantive change in Florida
electoral law.6 Its decisions were rooted in long-established precedent and were consistent with the

relevant statutory provisions, taken as a whole. It did what courts do7it decided the case before it in light
of the legislatures intent to leave no legally cast vote uncounted. In so doing, it relied on the sufficiency of
the general intent of the voter standard articulated by the state legislature, coupled with a procedure for
ultimate review by an impartial judge, to resolve the concern about disparate evaluations of contested
ballots. If we assumeas I dothat the members of that court and the judges who would have carried out
its mandate are impartial, its decision does not even raise a colorable federal question.
235. Never argue the facts. if a police officer believe you're going 90 in a 60.. That is what he
believes..Those are his facts..He has the right to believe whatever he wants
I have the right to believe that there is no injured man[party] you have no case
236. i believe your law says that the highways are free for man [cf. criminal code of canada sec 2.
highway
voie publique ou grande route
highway means a road to which the public has the right of access, and includes bridges over which
or tunnels through which a road passes;

in the sate have them read the law into the court..specially the footnotes..u may need to go tot a
law library to get this info.

238..i am not saying i am going to do this but some man may come along and after what you did they
could probably sue you in your official and private capacities
239 - if they dont bring an injured man or woman before the court and force the defendant/claimant to
pay the defendant/claimant is going to be harmed?
240 we are not able to help society by voting we are going to help society by winning in court we are
the checks and balances .Alright are antecedent to the Constitution...9th article of the bill of rights and
the queens coronation oath repeats the same sentiments..
241 Attorneys like to make affidavits but they can only certified they cannot verify it in open court unless
they have first hand knowledge of the matter..
243 All testimony affidavits should be given under oath or affirmation ( This knocks out all the
attorneys affidavits)... We do this because the courts will accept any paperwork submitted and lawyers
will often throw they are certified at Davids in the mix
certified just simply means that they witness that, that paper existed on that date. they are not Saying
that certification means it is true what is on the paper
244 facts can be false facts and true facts ..thats is why You never ever argue facts let them say wha
they want..what you're going to require is a third-party impartial witness To testify whose facts are
true .Because we have equal standing in court