Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTEGRANTES:
LINDYS ORTIZ QUINTERO
ELKIN MUOS BELEO
JOSE PEREZ REY
BRAYAN VARGAS ACOSTA
TALLER No. 3
PRESENTADO A:
M.Sc LEIDER SALCEDO
= ( ) ()
=0
3 () = ( ) ()
=0
Por tanto:
2
2
(0 ) = 0 + (0.5) = 0.5 +
= 4.5
0
0.5
2
2
(1 ) = 1 + (1) = 1 + = 3
1
1
2
2
(2 ) = 2 + (2) = 2 + = 3
2
2
2
2
(3 ) = 3 + (2.5) = 2. ,5 +
= 3.3
3
2.5
Reemplazando los valores de (0 ), (1 ), (2 ) (3 ) en el polinomio interpolador
se tiene:
3 () = (0.5)0 () + (1)1 () + (2)2 () + (2.5)3 ()
3 () = (4.5)0 () + (3)1 () + (3)2 () + (3.3)3 ()
Dnde:
() =
=0
Dnde:
3
0 () =
=0
0
( 1 )( 2 )( 3 )
=
(0 1 )(0 2 )(0 3 )
0 () =
3 5.5 2 + 9.5 5
1.5
0 () = 0.666666 3 + 3.666666 2 6.333333 + 3.333333
0 () =
1 () =
=0
1
( 0 )( 2 )( 3 )
=
(1 0 )(1 2 )(1 3 )
2 () =
=0
2
( 0 )( 1 )( 3 )
=
(2 0 )(2 1 )(2 3 )
3 () =
=0
3
( 0 )( 1 )( 2 )
=
(
3 0 )(3 1 )(3 2 )
( 0.5)( 1)( 2)
(2.5 0.5)(2.5 1)(2.5 2)
3 3.5 2 + 3.5 1
3 () =
1.5
3 () = 0.666666 3 2.333333 2 + 2.333333 0.666666
3 () =
Por tanto;
3 () = (4.5)(0.666666 3 + 3.666666 2 6.333333 + 3.333333)
+ (3)(1.333333 3 6.666666 2 + 9.666666 3.333333)
+ (3)(1.333333 3 + 5.333333 2 5.666666 + 1.666666)
+ (3.3)(0.666666 3 2.333333 2 + 2.333333 0.666666)
3 () = 0.799999 3 + 4.799999 2 8.799999 + 7.799999
Utilizando el polinomio interpolador de Lagrange para aproximar (1.2) y (1.5), se
tiene:
(1.2)
(1.2) 3 ()
2
1.2 +
0.799999(1.2)3 + 4.799999(1.2)2 8.799999(1.2) + 7.799999
1.2
2.866666 2.769600
(1.5)
(1.5) 3 ()
4
1.5 +
2
0.799999(1.5)3 + 4.799999(1.5)2 8.799999(1.5) + 7.799999
1.5
2.833333 2.700001
Grfica:
Grfica 1
2
() = + ,
3 () = 0.799999 3 + 4.799999 2 8.799999 + 7.799999,
Aproximacin de la grfica:
Grfica 2
2
() = + ,
1
) .
2 +1
aproximar el nmero y 0 (
SOLUCIN
El polinomio de Lagrange es:
= ( ) ()
=0
3 () = ( ) ()
=0
() =
=0
Dnde:
3
0 () =
=0
0
( 1 )( 2 )( 3 )
=
(0 1 )(0 2 )(0 3 )
1 () =
=0
1
( 0 )( 2 )( 3 )
=
(1 0 )(1 2 )(1 3 )
2 () =
=0
2
( 0 )( 1 )( 3 )
=
(2 0 )(2 1 )(2 3 )
3 () =
=0
3
( 0 )( 1 )( 2 )
=
(3 0 )(3 1 )(3 2 )
( 0)( 0.5)( 1)
(1.5 0)(1.5 0.5)(1.5 1)
3 1.5 2 + 0.5
3 () =
0.75
3 () = 1.333333 3 2.000000 2 + 0.666666
3 () =
Por tanto;
3 () = (1)0 () + (0.8)1 () + (0.5)2 () + (0.307692)3 ()
3 () = (1)(1.333333 3 + 4.000000 2 3.666666 + 1.000000)
+ (0.8)(4.000000 3 10.000000 2 + 6.000000)
+ (0.5)(4.000000 3 + 8.000000 2 3.000000)
+ (0.307692)(1.333333 3 2. 000000 2 + 0.666666)
3 () = 0.276922 3 0.615384 2 0.161538 + 1.000000
1
1
3
() =
1
1
=
+1 3
2 + 1 = 3
2 = 3 1 = 2
= 2
() 3 ()
1
3
2
0.276922(2) 0.615384(2) 0.161538(2) + 1.000000
3
0.333333 0.324036
1
0 ( 2 +1)
() =
1
1
1
=
( 2
)
2
+1
0 +1
() 3 ()
1
1
1
( 2
) (0.276922 3 0.615384 2 0.161538 + 1.000000)
0 +1
0
1
1
( 2
) (0.069230 4 0.205128 3 0.080769 2 + )|10
+
1
0
1
1
( 2
) 0.069230(1)4 0.205128(1)3 0.080769(1)2 + 1 0
+
1
0
1
1
( 2
) 0.783333
0 +1
+
1
0
1
1
( 2
) = (1) (0)
0 +1
1
1
( 2
) = 0.785398
0 +1
Grfica:
Grfica 3
Aproximacin de la grfica:
Grfica 4
() =
1
,
2 +1
1
2
10
1
0 = 1 + (0) = 1
2
1
1 = 1 + (1) = 0.5
2
1
2 = 1 + (2) = 0
2
1
3 = 1 + (3) = 0.5
2
1
4 = 1 + (4) = 1
2
Por tanto,
4 () = 0 + 1 ( (1)) + 2 ( (1))( (0.5)) + 3 ( (1))( (0.5))( 0)
+ 4 ( (1))( (0.5))( 0)( 0.5)
4 () = 0 + 1 ( + 1) + 2 ( + 1)( + 0.5) + 3 ( + 1)( + 0.5)
+ 4 ( + 1)( + 0.5)( 0.5)
Para calcular los valores de 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , se utiliza la definicin de diferencias
divididas, construyendo la siguiente tabla:
=
= .
=
= .
=
[ ]
[0 ]
[1 ]
[2 ]
[3 ]
[4 ]
[ , ]
[ , , ]
[ , , , ]
[ , , , , ]
[0 , 1 ]
[1 , 2 ]
[2 , 3 ]
[3 , 4 ]
[0 , 1 , 2 ]
[1 , 2 , 3 ]
[2 , 3 , 4 ]
[0 , 1 , 2 , 3 ]
[1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]
[0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]
[1 ] = (1 ) = (0.5) = ( ) = 0.50000000
2
2
[2 ] = (2 ) = (0) = (0)((0)) = 0.00000000
1
[3 ] = (3 ) = (0.5) = ( ) = 0.50000000
2
2
[4 ] = (4 ) = (1) = () = 0.00000000
Segundas diferencias divididas:
11
[0 , 1 ] =
[1 ] [0 ]
0.5 0
=
= 1.00000000
1 0
0.5 (1)
[1 , 2 ] =
[2 ] [1 ]
0 0.5
=
= 1.00000000
2 1
0 (0.5)
[2 , 3 ] =
[3 ] [2 ] 0.5 0
=
= 1.00000000
3 2
0.5 0
[3 , 4 ] =
[4 ] [3 ] 0 0.5
=
= 1.00000000
4 3
1 0.5
[1 , 2 ] [0 , 1 ]
1 1
=
= 2.00000000
2 0
0 (1)
[1 , 2 , 3 ] =
[2 , 3 ] [1 , 2 ]
1 (1)
=
= 2.00000000
3 1
0.5 (0.5)
[2 , 3 , 4 ] =
[3 , 4 ] [2 , 3 ] 1 1
=
= 2.00000000
4 2
10
[1 , 2 , 3 ] [0 , 1 , 2 ]
2 (2)
8
=
= = 2.66666666
3 0
0.5 (1) 3
[1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ] =
[2 , 3 , 4 ] [1 , 2 , 3 ]
2 2
8
=
= = 2.66666666
4 1
1 (0.5)
3
[0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ] =
=
= .
=
= .
=
[ ]
[ , ]
[ , , ]
[ , , , ]
[ , , , , ]
0.00000000
0.50000000
0.00000000
0.50000000
0.00000000
1.00000000
1.00000000
1.00000000
1.00000000
2.00000000
2.00000000
2.00000000
2.66666666
2.66666666
2.66666666
Dnde:
0 = [0 ] = 0.00000000
1 = [0 , 1 ] = 1.00000000
12
2 = [0 , 1 , 2 ] = 2.00000000
8
3 = [0 , 1 , 2 , 3 ] = = 2.66666666
3
8
4 = [0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ] = = 2.66666666
3
Por lo tanto, el polinomio interpolador de Newton es:
8
4 () = 0 + (1)( + 1) + (2)( + 1)( + 0.5) + ( ) ( + 1)( + 0.5)
3
8
+ ( ) ( + 1)( + 0.5)( 0.5)
3
8
4 () = + 1 + (2)( 2 + 1.5 + 0.5) + ( ) ( 3 + 1.5 2 + 0.5)
3
8
+ ( ) ( 4 + 3 0.25 2 0.25)
3
8
4
8
8
2
2
4 () = + 1 2 2 3 1 + 3 + 4 2 + 4 3 + 2 +
3
3
3
3
3
3
8 2 8 4
4 () =
3
3
4 () = 2.66666666 2 2.66666666 4
Grfica:
Grfica 5
13
Ampliacin de la grfica:
Grfica 6
() = (),
3 () = 2.66666666 2 2.66666666 4 ,
4. Use la definicin de diferencia divididas para deducir la frmula para calcular 4 .
SOLUCIN
4 = [0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]
[0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ] =
[1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ] [0 , 1 , 2 , 3 ]
4 0
[2 , 3 , 4 ] [1 , 2 , 3 ] [1 , 2 , 3 ] [0 , 1 , 2 ]
4 1
3 0
[0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ] =
4 0
14
[0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]
[3 , 4 ] [2 , 3 ] [2 , 3 ] [1 , 2 ] [2 , 3 ] [1 , 2 ] [1 , 2 ] [0 , 1 ]
4 2
3 1
3 1
2 0
4 1
3 0
=
4 0
[0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]
[4 ] [3 ] [3 ] [2 ] [3 ] [2 ] [2 ] [1 ] [3 ] [2 ] [2 ] [1 ] [2 ] [1 ] [1 ] [0 ]
2 1
1 0
4 3
3 2
3 2
2 1
3 2
2 1
4 2
3 1
3 1
2 0
4 1
3 0
=
4 0
5. Supongamos que es una funcin cuya primera, segunda y tercera derivada son
continuas en y considere los nodos 0 = 1 , 1 = y 2 = + 2 con 1 > 0,
2 > 0 y
a. Construya el polinomio interpolador de Newton 2 que aproxime a en los nodos
dados.
b. Utilice 2 para probar que:
2
2
( + 2 ) () () ( 1 )
|
]
2
= 1 + 2
2
1
SOLUCIN
a. La forma general de 2 es:
2 () = 0 + 1 ( 0 ) + 2 ( 0 )( 1 )
Reemplazando los valores de los nodos, se tiene:
2 () = 0 + 1 ( ( 1 )) + 2 ( ( 1 ))( )
Los valores de las constantes 0 , 1 2 , se calculan por medio de la definicin
de diferencias divididas.
=
=
= +
[ ]
[0 ]
[1 ]
[2 ]
[ , ]
[ , , ]
[0 , 1 ]
[1 , 2 ]
[0 , 1 , 2 ]
[1 ] [0 ] () ( 1 ) () ( 1 )
=
=
1 0
( 1 )
1
15
[1 , 2 ] =
[2 ] [1 ] ( + 2 ) () ( + 2 ) ()
=
=
2 1
+ 2
2
[1 , 2 ] [0 , 1 ]
2
1
]
[0 , 1 , 2 =
=
2 0
+ 2 ( 1 )
1 [( + 2 ) ()] 2 [() ( 1 )]
=
1 2 (1 + 2 )
Por lo tanto, la tabla de diferencias divididas queda:
[ ]
=
=
( 1 )
()
= +
( + 2 )
[ , ]
[ , , ]
() ( 1 )
1
( + 2 ) ()
2
1 [( + 2 ) ()] 2 [() ( 1 )]
1 2 (1 + 2 )
Dnde:
0 = [0 ] = ( 1 )
() ( 1 )
1 = [0 , 1 ] =
1
[(
1
+ 2 ) ()] 2 [() ( 1 )]
2 = [0 , 1 , 2 ] =
1 2 (1 + 2 )
Por tanto, el polinomio interpolador de Newton 2 es:
() ( 1 )
2 () = ( 1 ) + (
) ( ( 1 ))
1
1 [( + 2 ) ()] 2 [() ( 1 )]
+(
) ( ( 1 ))( )
1 2 (1 + 2 )
Resolviendo el anterior polinomio se tiene:
1
2 () = ( 1 ) + (() ( 1 )) ( ) + (() ( 1 )) (
)
1
1
1 [( + 2 ) ()] 2 [() ( 1 )]
+ (
) ( 2 (2 1 )
1 2 (1 + 2 )
+ (1 ))
16
2 () = ( 1 ) + (() ( 1 )) ( ) + () ( 1 )
1
(() ( 1 )) ( )
1
1 [( + 2 ) ()] 2 [() ( 1 )] 2
+ (
)
1 2 (1 + 2 )
1 [( + 2 ) ()] 2 [() ( 1 )]
(
) (2 1 )
1 2 (1 + 2 )
1 [( + 2 ) ()] 2 [() ( 1 )]
(
) ( 1 )
1 2 (1 + 2 )
1 [( + 2 ) ()] 2 [() ( 1 )] 2
2 () = (
)
1 2 (1 + 2 )
() ( 1 )
+[
1
1 [( + 2 ) ()] 2 [() ( 1 )]
(
) (2 1 )]
1 2 (1 + 2 )
+ [() (() ( 1 )) ( )
1
[(
[()
)
1
+ 2 ()] 2
( 1 )]
(
) ( 1 )]
1 2 (1 + 2 )
b. Prueba:
[( + 2 ) ()] [() ( 1 )]
2
2
() ( 1 )
=(
)(
) +
1 + 2
2
1
1
1 [( + 2 ) ()] 2 [() ( 1 )]
(
) (2 1 )
1 2 (1 + 2 )
2 2
2
( + 2 ) () () ( 1 )
2
=
(
)
|
(
)
2
1 + 2
2
1
2 =
6. Aplique las formulas cerradas de Newton Cotes (la regla del trapecio, la regla de
Simpson, la regla de los 3/8 de Simpson y la regla de Boole) para aproximar las
siguientes integrales:
2
a. 2 2
b. 02
SOLUCIN
La solucin exacta con ocho (8) dgitos de precisin es:
2
2 2 = 13.42475937 =
a. Aplicando la regla del trapecio:
=1
17
0 = = 2
1 = = 2
=
1 0 2 (2)
=
=4
Luego,
()
2
2
{(0 ) + (1 )}
2
{(0 ) + (1 )}
2
2
4
2 {(2) + (2)}
2
2
2
2 2{0.54134113 + 29.55622440}
2
2
2 60.19513106 =
2
46.77037169
100 =
100 = 348.388%
||
|13.42475937|
Grfica:
18
= 60.19513106
2 0 2 (2)
=
=2
1 = 0 + = 2 + 2 = 0
Luego,
()
2
2
{(0 ) + 4(1 ) + (2 )}
3
{(0 ) + 4(1 ) + (2 )}
3
2
2
2 {(2) + 4(0) + (2)}
3
2
2
2
2 {0.54134113 + 0 + 29.55622440}
3
2
19
2 20.06504369 =
2
6.64028432
100 =
100 = 49.462%
||
|13.42475937|
Grfica:
3 0 2 (2) 4
=
=
3
3
1 = 0 + = 2 +
4
2
=
3
3
2 4 2
2 = 1 + = + =
3 3 3
Luego,
b
()
a
3
{(0 ) + 3(1 ) + 3(2 ) + (3 )}
8
20
2
2
3
{(0 ) + 3(1 ) + 3(2 ) + (3 )}
8
2
3 4
2
2
2 ( ) {(2) + 3 ( ) + 3 ( ) + (2)}
8 3
3
3
2
2
1
2 {0.54134113 + 0.68455615 + 2.59697872 + 29.55622440}
2
2
2
2 16.68955020 =
2
3.26479083
100 =
100 = 24.319%
||
|13.42475937|
Aplicando Boole:
=4
0 = = 2
4 = = 2
=
2 0 2 (2)
=
=1
1 = 0 + 1 = 2 + 1 = 1
2 = 1 + = 1 + 1 = 0
3 = 2 + = 0 + 1 = 1
Luego,
()
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
{7(0 ) + 32(1 ) + 12(2 ) + 32(3 ) + 7(4 )}
45
2
{7(0 ) + 32(1 ) + 12(2 ) + 32(3 ) + 7(4 )}
45
2
(1){7(2) + 32(1) + 12(0) + 32(1) + 7(2)}
45
2
{3.78938791 + 11.77214212 + 0 + 86.98501851 + 206.89357080}
45
2 13.75289419 =
2
21
0.32813482
100 =
100 = 2.444%
||
|13.42475937|
Grfica:
b. 02
La solucin exacta con ocho (8) dgitos de precisin es:
= 1.11754074 =
0
1 0 2 0
=
=
=
1
2
Luego,
22
()
{(0 ) + (1 )}
2
{(0 ) + (1 )}
2
2 {(0) + ( )}
2
2
0
{0 + 0.95002442}
4
0.74614743 =
0
0.37139331
100 =
100 = 33.233%
||
|1.11754074|
Grfica:
= 0.74614743
2 = =
2 0 2 0
=
=
=
2
4
1 = 0 + = 0 + =
4 4
Luego,
()
{(0 ) + 4(1 ) + (2 )}
3
{(0 ) + 4(1 ) + (2 )}
3
4 {(0) + 4 ( ) + ( )}
3
4
2
0
{0 + 3.09876561 + 0.95002442}
12
1.05997075 =
0
0.05756999
100 =
100 = 5.151%
||
|1.11754074|
Grfica:
24
= 1.05997075
3 0 2 0
=
=
=
3
6
1 = 0 + = 0 +
2 = 1 + =
=
6 6
+ =
6 6 3
Luego,
b
()
a
3
{(0 ) + 3(1 ) + 3(2 ) + (3 )}
8
3
{(0 ) + 3(1 ) + 3(2 ) + (3 )}
8
( ) {(0) + 3 ( ) + 3 ( ) + ( )}
8
6
6
3
2
0
1.07949464 =
0
0.03804609
100 =
100 = 3.404%
||
|1.11754074|
Aplicando Boole:
=4
0 = = 0
4 = =
2 0 2 0
=
=
=
4
8
=
8 8
2 = 1 + = + =
8 8 4
1 = 0 + 1 = 0 +
3 = 2 + =
3
+ =
4 8
8
Luego,
()
2
{7(0 ) + 32(1 ) + 12(2 ) + 32(3 ) + 7(4 )}
45
2
{7(0 ) + 32(1 ) + 12(2 ) + 32(3 ) + 7(4 )}
45
2
( ) {7(0) + 32 ( ) + 12 ( ) + 32 ( ) + 7 ( )}
45 8
8
4
8
2
1.09984137 =
0
26
0.01769937
100 =
100 = 1.583%
||
1.11754074
Grfica:
= 1.09984137
1 0 2 0
=
=2
Luego,
2
()
0
{(0 ) + (1 )}
2
2
2
() {(0) + (2)} = 4
2
0
2
() (0) + (2) 4 = 0
()
27
2 0 2 0
=
=1
1 = 0 + = 0 + 1 = 1
Luego,
2
()
0
{(0 ) + 4(1 ) + (2 )}
3
2
1
() {(0) + 4(1) + (2)} = 2
3
0
2
()
8. Aproxime la integral 0
1
,
54
1
= 2.09439510
5 4
28
6 0 2 0
=
=
6
3
1 = 0 + = 0 +
=
3 3
2 = 1 + =
2
+ =
3 3
3
3 = 2 + =
2
+ =
3
3
4 = 3 + = +
5 = 4 + =
4
=
3
3
4 5
+ =
3
3
3
Luego,
1
() {(0 ) + ( ) + 2 ( )}
2
=1
{(0 ) + (6 ) + 2 ( )}
5 4
2
=1
Expandiendo lo sumatoria
2
0
2
5 4
5 4
2
4
5
3 {(0) + (2) + 2 ( ) + 2 ( ) + 2() + 2 ( ) + 2 ( )}
2
3
3
3
3
2 2 2 2 2
{1 + 1 + + + + + }
5 4
6
3 7 9 7 3
1
2.16088838
5 4
29
Grfica:
Grfica 13. Aproximacin por la Regla Compuesta del Trapecio con seis (6) subintervalos
8
=4
2
1
1 = 2 = 2 + 1 = 8 + 1 = 9
2
0 = = 0
2 = 8 = = 2
=
2 0 2 0
=
=
2
8
4
=
4 4
2 = 1 + = + =
4 4 2
1 = 0 + = 0 +
3 = 2 + =
3
+ =
2 4
4
4 = 3 + =
3
+ =
4
4
5 = 4 + = +
5
=
4
4
30
6 = 5 + =
5 3
+ =
4
4
2
7 = 6 + =
3 7
+ =
2
4
4
Luego,
=1
=1
2
4
() {(0 ) + (2 )} +
(2 ) +
(21 )
3
3
3
=1
=1
2
4
{(0 ) + (8 )} +
(2 ) +
(21 )
5 4
3
3
3
5 4
2
[(2 ) + (4 ) + (6 )]
{(0 ) + (8 )} +
3
3
4
[(1 ) + (3 ) + (5 ) + (7 )]
+
3
1
5 4
3
4 {(0) + (2)} + + ( ) [ ( ) + () + ( )]
3
3 4
2
2
4
3
5
7
+ ( ) [ ( ) + ( ) + ( ) + ( )]
3 4
4
4
4
4
5 4
1 1 1
[1 + 1] + [ + + ]
12
6 5 9 5
1
2.02321305
5 4
6
=2
3
1
1 = 2 = 3 + 1 = 6 + 1 = 7
3
0 = = 0
31
3 = 6 = = 2
=
3 0 2 0
=
=
3
6
3
1 = 0 + = 0 +
=
3 3
2 = 1 + =
2
+ =
3 3
3
3 = 2 + =
2
+ =
3
3
4 = 3 + = +
5 = 4 + =
4
=
3
3
4 5
+ =
3
3
3
Luego,
=1
=1
3
3
9
{(0 ) + (3 )} +
()
(3 ) +
(32 )
8
4
8
9
(31 )
8
=1
5 4
1
=1
=1
3
3
9
{(0 ) + (3 )} +
(3 ) +
(32 )
8
4
8
2
9
(31 )
8
=1
5 4
3
3
9
{(0 ) + (6 )} +
[(1 ) + (4 )]
(3 ) +
8
4
8
9
[(2 ) + (5 )]
+
8
32
0
2
5 4
3
3
9
4
( ) {(0) + (2)} + ( ) () + ( ) [ ( ) + ( )]
8 3
4 3
8 3
3
3
9
2
5
+ ( ) [ ( ) + ( )]
8 3
3
3
1
1
3 1 1
3 1 1
{1 + 1} + ( ) +
[ + ]+
[ + ]
5 4
8
4 9
8 3 7
8 7 3
1
1.99366200
5 4
-2
-1
0
( ) 2
3
() {(0 ) + ( ) + 2 ( )}
2
=1
Dnde:
=3
0 = = 0
3 = = 3
=
3 0 3 0
=
=1
1 = 0 + = 0 + 1 = 1
2 = 1 + = 1 + 1 = 2
Luego,
3
() {(0 ) + (3 ) + 2 ( )}
2
0
=1
Expandiendo lo sumatoria
33
()
0
3
1
() {(0) + (3) + 2(1) + 2(1)}
2
0
3
1
() {2 + 0 + 2(2) + 2(1)}
2
0
3
1
() {2 4 2}
2
0
3
1
() {4}
2
0
3
() 2
0
1
()2
12
(2) , con
()2
12
SOLUCIN
Se tiene que:
() =
=2
0 = = 0
= 2 = = 1
0 2 0 1 0 1
=
=
=
=
2
2
2
1 1
1 = 0 + = 0 + =
2 2
Por tanto:
() [(0 ) + ( ) + 2 ( )]
2
=1
34
1
1
2
[(0 ) + (2 ) + 2 ( )]
2
=1
1
2
= [(0 ) + (2 ) + 2(1 )]
4
0
1
1
2
= [(0) + (1) + 2(0.5)]
4
0
1
1
2
= [1.00000000 + 0.36787944 + 2(0.77880078)]
4
0
1
= 0.73137025
0
()2
12
(2) () =
(10)(0.5)2
12
Dnde:
2
(1) () = 2
2
(2) () = 4 2 2
Por lo tanto:
2
2
(2) () = 4 2 2
De esta manera nos queda que:
1
= 48 (4 2 2 ) = 24 (2 2 ), con [0,1]
Como la cota del error es el valor mximo de en valor absoluto, entonces:
||
1
2
2
| (2 2 )|
24
1
2
2
|2 2 |
24
2
2
Hallemos los valores extremos de la funcin 1 () = 2 2 en el intervalo
[0,1] y determinar el valor mximo en valor absoluto. Entonces:
(1)
(1)
1 () = 6 2 2 3 1 () = 0 6 2 3 = 0
2
2
2 (3 2 2 ) = 0 (3 2 2 ) = 0 = 3 2 2 = 0 =
= .
Luego los nmeros crticos de la funcin dada son = , = . y =
. y ninguno est en el intervalo [0,1]
Como ningn numero critico de 1 est en el intervalo [0,1] no hay que hallar los
valores de 1 en tales valores crticos.
Calculamos los valores de 1 en los extremos del intervalo [0,1]
2
1
= 0.36787944
()2
12
Es decir,
|| =
(1 0) 1 0 2
2
2
(
) |4 2 2 | 106
12
|| =
2
2
2
2
(1) 106
|2 2 | =
2
12
122
|| =
1
106
62
1
106
106
6
2
10
.
62
6
6
Finalmente, para que se cumplan las condiciones dadas por lo menos los
intervalos debe ser de 409.
36