Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A STRONG
METROPOLITAN CENTER
04
Introduction &
Purpose
06
Coordinated
Planning Efforts
& Strategic
Partnerships
07
Status Update on
Targeted Outcomes
08
Pedestrian
Network Update
14
Bicycle Network
Update
20
Conclusion
INTRODUCTION
The Philadelphia Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan was adopted by the Philadelphia City Planning
Commission (PCPC) in April of 2012. This Progress Report reflects the efforts by the PCPC,
Streets Department, Mayors Office of Transportation & Utilities, Pennsylvania Department
of Transportation, and other entities towards expanding the pedestrian and bicycle networks
and creating policies for safety and traffic enforcement over the past three years.
Purpose
CITYWIDE VISION
CITYWIDE
VISION
CONNECT
PHILADELPHIA
COMPLETE STREETS
2 35
Philadelphia Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan Update
Goal 4.2.2
Expand on- and off-street networks
serving pedestrians and bicyclists.
Goal 4.2.3
Improve safety for pedestrians and
bicyclists and reduce pedestrian
and bicycle crashes.
Central
30%
4.9%
65.1%
Central
Northeast
3.5%
0.4%
96.1%
Lower Far
Northeast
1.9%
0.1%
98%
Lower North
8.6%
2.8%
88.6%
Lower
Northeast
4.3%
0.3%
95.4%
Lower
Northwest
4.5%
0.7%
94.8%
Lower South
2.2%
2.2%
95.6%
Lower
Southwest
3.3%
0.1%
96.6%
North
5.4%
0.3%
94.3%
North
Delaware
2.9%
0.3%
96.8%
River Wards
8.1%
2.9%
89%
South
8.8%
6.5%
84.7%
University
Southwest
23.1%
6.2%
70.7%
Upper Far
Northeast
1.5%
0%
98.5%
Upper North
2.8%
0%
97.2%
Upper
Northwest
3.9%
1%
95.1%
West
4.2%
1%
94.8%
West Park
5.6%
0.6%
93.8%
UFNE
LFNE
CNE
UNW
LNW
UNO
NDEL
LNE
NOR
RW
LN
WP
CTR
WST
USW
STH
LS
LSW
Car
59%
Public Transit
26.5%
Walk
8.5%
Other
4.1%
Bike
2%
Source: 2010-2014 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates, U.S. Census Bureau
DISTRICT
Pedestrian Bicycle
Several plans and policy changes have significantly impacted the pedestrian and bicycle
landscape in Philadelphia since the release of the 2012 Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan, including
the 2013 Philadelphia Complete Street Design Handbook and the 2013 Philadelphia Trail
Master Plan. The Complete Streets Handbook guides developers through City preferred
design solutions for the public realm. Developers are required to submit Complete Street
Checklists to PCPC and Streets Department to track public impacts of the project. These
plans and checklists are available on the PCPC and Streets Department websites.
In recent months, there has been an increased focus on eliminating all traffic
fatalities and severe injuries. It is recommended to reassess these 2020
targets to see if a more aggressive target should be set in order to achieve
safe streets for all road users. In addition, it is recommended to revise the
target outcomes to include a measure of the number of pedestrians and
bicyclists severely injured as a result of a traffic crash.
The U.S. Census American Community Survey 5-year Estimates provides
information on the mode of transportation used by Philadelphia residents as
they arrive to work. Bicycle use has increased since 2010 from 1.6 percent
to almost 2 percent. Most notably, two districts, South Philadelphia (6.5%)
and University Southwest (6.2%), have made significant gains in achieving
the bicycle commute mode share goal of 6.5 percent. However, 10 of the
18 districts, mainly the farthest from employment centers, remain below
1 percent and this reflects the geographic obstacles that exist towards
achieving the city-wide goal for bicycle commute mode share. Pedestrian
commute mode share remains steady at approximately 8.5 percent. Walking
to work depends on close proximity to employment centers, so districts
closest to major employment nodes in Center City, University City, and
Temple University have higher pedestrian mode shares.
Measuring Outcomes
Goal
Measure
Safety
Current Status
Bicyclist fatalities
reduced by 25%
Pedestrian fatalities
increased by 17%
Bicyclist injuries
reduced by 5%
Pedestrian injuries
reduced by 11%
Increase pedestrian
counts at key locations for
Complete Streets decision
making
2011
2012
2013
2014
Bicycle
1.71
1.95
2.02
1.99
Walk
8.59
8.61
8.55
8.48
Pending
Ongoing
Encouragement
Encouragement
Encouragement
In the past three years, pedestrian policies and the methodology for pedestrian safety and
infrastructure projects have changed significantly, in large part because of recommendations
from the 2012 Plan.
Highlighted Projects
ARLE Projects
10
By
be
rry
Re
dL
el
v
se
Ve
rre
e
Kn
Ro
ts
ls
We
Montgomery
ion
ig
h
ills
M
lls
Rh
Be
Ste
n
eto
Bu
stl
Ogontz
Harbison
te
Sta
Burlington
Kelly
ing
Lehigh
ram
A
re
a
law
Spring Garden De
30th
49
Washing
to
th
ros
Snyder
Oregon
Camden
Pattison
n
Pe
84t
Ba
r
nd
Isla
Sidewalk Project Prioritization
High
(Includes missing sidewalks
and sidewalks in very
poor condition)
Priority Area
Gloucester
High
Lin
db
erg
h
yun
Pass
33rd
e
tra
ick
nt
Belmo
63rd
Girard
La
nc
as
ter
Walnut
Baltimor
Delaware
an
rd
nt
Hu
Gr
kfo
n
Fra
Lev
ark
P
ing
Godfrey
Oxford
an
Broad
Lincoln
ge
Rid
nr
Holme
ttm
He
Co
nto
Ac a d e my
aw
11
12
Curb Extensions
Traffic Calming
13
Type
14
2015
Conventional
222
407
229.4
424.3
Painted Buffer
11
11
16.7
18.2
Sharrows
10
36.7
54.2
Climbing Lane
0.3
0.3
0.9
0.9
Contraflow
0.1
0.1
0.6
0.6
By
be
rry
Re
el
dL
ion
v
se
ills
n
eto
stl
A
e
w
ela
Spring Ga
Girard
30th
rden D
Lin
db
erg
h
yunk
Pass
n
e
ros
Pe
Oregon
Pattison
nd
Isla
Washing
to
Snyder
am
ng
i
ram
Lehigh
Broad
Kelly
Hu
33rd
Pa
ar
Walnut
e
Baltimor
49
th
rtr
nt
Belmo
63rd
Lan
ca
ste
r
te
Sta
vic
rk
g
tin
rd
kfo
n
Fra
an
Le
ge
Rid
Harbison
Godfrey
Holme
Bu
Oxford
Ogontz
Lincoln
ry
Ba
ig
h
an
Gr
ttm
nto
Hen
Co
Academy
Ste
els
W
aw
Be
Kn
Rh
M
lls
84t
ts
Ve
rre
e
Ro
15
16
By
be
rry
Re
el
dL
ion
v
se
Ve
rre
e
Ro
ills
Rh
ttm
nto
an
n
eto
stl
rd
kfo
n
Fra
an
te
Sta
vic
rk
g
tin
Gr
Le
ge
Rid
Harbison
Godfrey
Holme
Bu
Oxford
ry
Ogontz
Lincoln
Hen
Co
Academy
Ste
Be
els
W
aw
M
lls
Pa
ar
yunk
Pass
e
ros
am
rtr
nd
Isla
Ba
Upcoming Projects
Snyder
Oregon
Pattison
Lin
db
erg
h
th
Pe
rden D
Washing
to
49
w
ela
Spring Ga
Girard
Walnut
e
Baltimor
84t
30th
63rd
Lan
ca
ste
r
ng
i
ram
Lehigh
Broad
33rd
nt
Belmo
Kelly
Hu
17
18
By
be
rry
Re
el
dL
ion
v
se
Ve
rre
e
Ro
ills
Rh
ttm
nto
an
n
eto
stl
rd
kfo
n
Fra
an
te
Sta
vic
rk
g
tin
Gr
Le
ge
Rid
Harbison
Godfrey
Holme
Bu
Oxford
ry
Ogontz
Lincoln
Hen
Co
Academy
Ste
Be
els
W
aw
M
lls
Pa
A
e
ar
w
ela
Spring Ga
Girard
rden D
30th
Walnut
e
Baltimor
Washing
to
49
th
Lin
db
erg
h
Snyder
yunk
Pass
n
e
ros
rtr
Ba
Pe
nd
am
Isla
84t
Oregon
Pattison
63rd
Lan
ca
ste
r
ng
i
ram
Lehigh
Broad
33rd
nt
Belmo
Kelly
Hu
19
CONCLUSION
This progress report evaluates how the goals of the 2012 Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan are
being met and raises awareness of the significant work that is still necessary over the next
five years to reach those goals. In the short term, efforts to address pedestrian and bicycle
safety and accessibility will continue as we move forward with the ten-year implementation
period. Several of these efforts are detailed throughout this report.
Currently, the City of Philadelphia holds a Silver designation by the Pedestrian and Bicycle
Information Center (PBIC) as a Walk Friendly Community. Based on the achievements from
the past three years, which this progress report highlights, the City of Philadelphia will
submit an updated application to PBIC in 2016 with the continued goal of reaching a Platinum
designation.
We will continue to submit competitive applications to and programs, such as the
Transportation Alternatives Program, the Multimodal Transportation Fund, and Congestion
Mitigation and Air Quality programs, for additional support for projects that enhance
Philadelphias pedestrian and bicycle network.
The City expects to release another progress report in two to four years with continued
evaluation of our progress to becoming a safer city for bicycle and pedestrian activities
leading Philadelphia towards a healthier and more accessible city.
20
Acknowledgements
City of Philadelphia:
Honorable Michael A. Nutter, Mayor
Written by:
Philadelphia City Planning Commission
Mayors Office of Transportation & Utilities
With coordination from:
Philadelphia Streets Department
Primary authors:
Jeannette Brugger, AICP, Mayors Office of Transportation & Utilities
David Kanthor, AICP, Philadelphia City Planning Commission
21