You are on page 1of 11

Page 1

2012-04-24 Revised TECH EVAL 63000 ICT Building - 63k sf

CONSULTANT'S NAME:

No.
No. of
of
Similar years
Projects Est.

TECHNICAL
APPROACH &
METHODOLOGY
WORK PLAN
ORGANIZATIO
N & STAFFING

ADEQUACY OF THE PROPOSED METHODOLOGY & WORK


PLAN

SPECIFIC
EXPERIENCE

EVAALUATION SHEET: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR MONTEGO
BAY FREE ZONE
10 YEARS
OVER 15 YEARS

3
5
2
3
5

ONE PROJECT
TWO PROJECTS
THREE PROJECTS
TECHNICAL APPROACH & METHODOLOGY
Considera
tions
Understanding of Terms of Reference
Quality of proposal
Method of carrying out Activities

10
3
7

WORK PLAN
Considera
tions
Main Activities
Content & Duration
Phasing & Interpretation
Milestones & Deliverables

4
3
1
2

ORGANIZATION & STAFFING


Considera
tions
Structure & Composition of Team
Technical Support Staff

8
2

MAXIM
UM
POINT
S

APEC
1

EVALUATOR
2
3

AVERAGE
SCORE

10

10

10

10

10

10.0

20

17

18

15

17

16.8

10

10

10

9.5

10

10

10

9.0

17.25

17.25

36

36

36

36

36

36.0

6.0

110

105.3

107.3

98.2

105.3

104.5

GENERAL QUALIFICATION

GENERAL QUALIFICATION

>15yrs 10>yrs<15

Prof.
Reg.

MSc.

BSc

TEAM LEADER 15
ARCHITECT 10

7
3.5

2
1

2
1.5

1
1

5
4

STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.10

3.5

1.5

ELECTRICAL ENG.10

3.5

1.5

MECHANICAL ENG.10

3.5

1.5

QUANTITY SURVEYOR 5

2.5

0.5

17.25 ### 17.25

17.3

18

ADEQUACY OF
ASSIGNMENT

ADEQUACY OF ASSIGNMENT

EXPERIENCE IN REGION &


LANGUAGE

KEY PROFESSIONAL STAFF QUALIFICATION & COMPETENCE FOR ASSIGNMENT

KEY PROFESSIONAL STAFF

5 or more projects/
less than
over 5 yrs experience 5

TEAM LEADER
ARCHITECT
STRUCTURAL /
CIVIL ENG.
ELECTRICAL ENG.
MECHANICAL ENG.
QUANTITY
SURVEYOR

9
7
6
5
5
4

7
5
4
3
3
2

EXPERIENCE IN REGION & LANGUAGE

TEAM LEADER
ARCHITECT
STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.
ELECTRICAL ENG.
MECHANICAL ENG.
QUANTITY SURVEYOR

6 years

5 or less

2
2
2
2
2
2

1
1
1
1
1
1

Languag
e
-English
1
1
1
1
1
1

Page 2

2012-04-24 Revised TECH EVAL 63000 ICT Building - 63k sf

CONSULTANT'S NAME:

MAXIM
UM
POINT
S

No.
No. of
of
Similar years
Projects Est.

TECHNICAL
APPROACH &
METHODOLO
GY
WORK PLAN
ORGANIZAT
ION &
STAFFING

ADEQUACY OF THE PROPOSED METHODOLOGY &


WORK PLAN

SPECIFIC
EXPERIENCE

EVAALUATION SHEET: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR MONTEGO
BAY FREE ZONE
10 YEARS
OVER 15 YEARS

3
5
2
3
5

ONE PROJECT
TWO PROJECTS
THREE PROJECTS

ADeB
EVALUATOR
2
3

AVERAGE
SCORE

10

10

10

10

9.5

TECHNICAL APPROACH & METHODOLOGY


Considera
tions
Understanding of Terms of Reference
Quality of proposal
Method of carrying out Activities

10
3
7

20

14

16.5

12.5

13.0

WORK PLAN
Considera
tions
Main Activities
Content & Duration
Phasing & Interpretation
Milestones & Deliverables

4
3
1
2

10

7.5

6.1

ORGANIZATION & STAFFING


Considera
tions
Structure & Composition of Team
Technical Support Staff

8
2

10

10

8.5

13.8

13.8

13.8

13.8

13.8

36

36

29

36

36

34.3

6.0

110

90.8

92.8

88.8

92.3

91.2

GENERAL QUALIFICATION

GENERAL QUALIFICATION

>15yrs 10>yrs<15

BSc

Prof.
Reg.
2

MSc.

ARCHITECT 10

3.5

1.5

STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.10

3.5

1.5

ELECTRICAL ENG.10

3.5

1.5

MECHANICAL ENG.10
QUANTITY SURVEYOR 5

3.5
2.5

1
1

1.5
1

1
0.5

4
1

TEAM LEADER 15

18

ADEQUACY OF
ASSIGNMENT

ADEQUACY OF ASSIGNMENT

EXPERIENCE IN
REGION & LANGUAGE

KEY PROFESSIONAL STAFF QUALIFICATION & COMPETENCE FOR ASSIGNMENT

KEY PROFESSIONAL STAFF

TEAM LEADER
ARCHITECT
STRUCTURAL /
CIVIL
ENG. ENG.
ELECTRICAL
QUANTITY
MECHANICAL ENG.
SURVEYOR

5 or more projects/
over 5 yrs9experience

7
6
5
5
4

EXPERIENCE IN REGION & LANGUAGE


TEAM LEADER
ARCHITECT
STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.
ELECTRICAL ENG.
MECHANICAL ENG.
QUANTITY SURVEYOR

6 years
2
2
2
2
2
2

5 or less
1
1
1
1
1
1

less than
5

7
5
4
3
3
2

Languag
e
-English
1
1
1
1
1
1

Page 3

2012-04-24 Revised TECH EVAL 63000 ICT Building - 63k sf

CONSULTANT'S NAME:

MAXIM
UM
POINT
S

No.
No. of
of
Similar years
Projects Est.

TECHNICAL
APPROACH &
METHODOLO
GY
WORK PLAN
ORGANIZAT
ION &
STAFFING

ADEQUACY OF THE PROPOSED METHODOLOGY &


WORK PLAN

SPECIFIC
EXPERIENCE

EVAALUATION SHEET: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR MONTEGO
BAY FREE ZONE
10 YEARS
OVER 15 YEARS

3
5
2
3
5

ONE PROJECT
TWO PROJECTS
THREE PROJECTS

TYA
EVALUATOR
2
3

AVERAGE
SCORE

10

10

10

10

10

10.0

TECHNICAL APPROACH & METHODOLOGY


Considera
tions
Understanding of Terms of Reference
Quality of proposal
Method of carrying out Activities

10
3
7

20

18

17

19

18

18.0

WORK PLAN
Considera
tions
Main Activities
Content & Duration
Phasing & Interpretation
Milestones & Deliverables

4
3
1
2

10

10

8.8

ORGANIZATION & STAFFING


Considera
tions
Structure & Composition of Team
Technical Support Staff

8
2

10

10

10

9.3

16.95

16.95

16.95

16.95

17.0

36

36

36

36

36

36.0

6.0

110

107.0

104.0

104.0

105.0

105.0

GENERAL QUALIFICATION

GENERAL QUALIFICATION

>15yrs 10>yrs<15

MSc.
1
1

BSc

1.5

1.5

3.5

1.5

3.5

1.5

2.5

0.5

TEAM LEADER 15
ARCHITECT 10
STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.10

7
3.5

2
1

3.5

ELECTRICAL ENG.10
MECHANICAL ENG.10
QUANTITY SURVEYOR 5

Prof.
2
Reg.

5
4

18

ADEQUACY OF
ASSIGNMENT

ADEQUACY OF ASSIGNMENT

EXPERIENCE IN
REGION & LANGUAGE

KEY PROFESSIONAL STAFF QUALIFICATION & COMPETENCE FOR ASSIGNMENT

KEY PROFESSIONAL STAFF

TEAM LEADER
ARCHITECT
STRUCTURAL /
CIVIL
ENG. ENG.
ELECTRICAL
QUANTITY
MECHANICAL ENG.
SURVEYOR

5 or more projects/
over 5 yrs9experience

7
6
5
5
4

EXPERIENCE IN REGION & LANGUAGE


TEAM LEADER
ARCHITECT
STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.
ELECTRICAL ENG.
MECHANICAL ENG.
QUANTITY SURVEYOR

6 years
2
2
2
2
2
2

5 or less
1
1
1
1
1
1

less than
5

7
5
4
3
3
2

Languag
e
-English
1
1
1
1
1
1

Page 4

2012-04-24 Revised TECH EVAL 63000 ICT Building - 63k sf

CONSULTANT'S NAME:

MAXIM
UM
POINT
S

No.
No. of
of
Similar years
Projects Est.

TECHNICAL
APPROACH &
METHODOLO
GY
WORK PLAN
ORGANIZAT
ION &
STAFFING

ADEQUACY OF THE PROPOSED METHODOLOGY &


WORK PLAN

SPECIFIC
EXPERIENCE

EVAALUATION SHEET: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR MONTEGO
BAY FREE ZONE
10 YEARS
OVER 15 YEARS

3
5
2
3
5

ONE PROJECT
TWO PROJECTS
THREE PROJECTS

CARL C. CHEN
EVALUATOR
2
3

AVERAGE
SCORE

10

7.0

10.0

10.0

10.0

TECHNICAL APPROACH & METHODOLOGY


Considera
tions
Understanding of Terms of Reference
Quality of proposal
Method of carrying out Activities

10
3
7

20

16.0

17.0

16.0

16.0

16

WORK PLAN
Considera
tions
Main Activities
Content & Duration
Phasing & Interpretation
Milestones & Deliverables

4
3
1
2

10

10.0

8.5

9.0

9.0

ORGANIZATION & STAFFING


Considera
tions
Structure & Composition of Team
Technical Support Staff

8
2

10

10.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

16.7

16.7

16.7

16.7

17

36

36.0

36.0

36.0

36.0

36

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

110

101.7

101.2

101.7

101.7

101.5

GENERAL QUALIFICATION

GENERAL QUALIFICATION

>15yrs 10>yrs<15

BSc

Prof.
Reg.
2

MSc.

3.5

1.5

3.5

1.5

ELECTRICAL ENG.10
MECHANICAL ENG.10

3.5

1.5

3.5

1.5

QUANTITY SURVEYOR 5

2.5

0.5

TEAM LEADER 15
ARCHITECT 10
STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.10

18

ADEQUACY OF
ASSIGNMENT

ADEQUACY OF ASSIGNMENT

EXPERIENCE IN
REGION & LANGUAGE

KEY PROFESSIONAL STAFF QUALIFICATION & COMPETENCE FOR ASSIGNMENT

KEY PROFESSIONAL STAFF

TEAM LEADER
ARCHITECT
STRUCTURAL /
CIVIL
ENG. ENG.
ELECTRICAL
QUANTITY
MECHANICAL ENG.
SURVEYOR

5 or more projects/
over 5 yrs9experience

7
6
5
5
4

EXPERIENCE IN REGION & LANGUAGE


TEAM LEADER
ARCHITECT
STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.
ELECTRICAL ENG.
MECHANICAL ENG.
QUANTITY SURVEYOR

6 years
2
2
2
2
2
2

5 or less
1
1
1
1
1
1

less than
5

7
5
4
3
3
2

Languag
e
-English
1
1
1
1
1
1

Page 5

2012-04-24 Revised TECH EVAL 63000 ICT Building - 63k sf

CONSULTANT'S NAME:

MAXIM KINGSLAND SCOTT BAUER ASSOC


UM
AVERAGE
EVALUATOR
POINT
SCORE
1
2
3
4
S

No.
No. of
of
Similar years
Projects Est.

TECHNICAL
APPROACH &
METHODOLO
GY
WORK PLAN
ORGANIZAT
ION &
STAFFING

ADEQUACY OF THE PROPOSED METHODOLOGY &


WORK PLAN

SPECIFIC
EXPERIENCE

EVAALUATION SHEET: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR MONTEGO
BAY FREE ZONE
10 YEARS
OVER 15 YEARS

3
5
2
3
5

ONE PROJECT
TWO PROJECTS
THREE PROJECTS

10

10

10

10

9.3

TECHNICAL APPROACH & METHODOLOGY


Considera
tions
Understanding of Terms of Reference
Quality of proposal
Method of carrying out Activities

10
3
7

20

16

14

12

16

14.5

WORK PLAN
Considera
tions
Main Activities
Content & Duration
Phasing & Interpretation
Milestones & Deliverables

4
3
1
2

10

5.5

7.1

ORGANIZATION & STAFFING


Considera
tions
Structure & Composition of Team
Technical Support Staff

8
2

10

10

10

8.8

16.35

16.35

16.35

16.35

16.4

36

36

36

36

36

36.0

6.0

110

99.35

97.85

95.35

99.35

98.0

GENERAL QUALIFICATION
GENERAL
QUALIFICATION

>15yrs 10>yrs<15

BSc

Prof.
Reg.
2

MSc.

ARCHITECT 10
STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.10

3.5

1.5

3.5

1.5

ELECTRICAL ENG.10

3.5

1.5

MECHANICAL ENG.10
QUANTITY SURVEYOR 5

3.5
2.5

1
1

1.5
1

1
0.5

4
1

TEAM LEADER 15

18

ADEQUACY OF
ASSIGNMENT

ADEQUACY OF ASSIGNMENT

EXPERIENCE IN
REGION & LANGUAGE

KEY PROFESSIONAL STAFF QUALIFICATION & COMPETENCE FOR ASSIGNMENT

KEY PROFESSIONAL STAFF

TEAM LEADER
ARCHITECT
STRUCTURAL /
CIVIL
ENG. ENG.
ELECTRICAL
QUANTITY
MECHANICAL ENG.
SURVEYOR

5 or more projects/
over 5 yrs9experience

7
6
5
5
4

EXPERIENCE IN REGION & LANGUAGE


TEAM LEADER
ARCHITECT
STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.
ELECTRICAL ENG.
MECHANICAL ENG.
QUANTITY SURVEYOR

6 years
2
2
2
2
2
2

5 or less
1
1
1
1
1
1

less than
5

7
5
4
3
3
2

Languag
e
-English
1
1
1
1
1
1

301768666.xls

POINTS

No. of years
Est.
No. of Similar
Projects
TECHNICAL
APPROACH &
METHODOLOG
Y
WORK PLAN
ORGANIZATIO
N & STAFFING

ADEQUACY OF THE PROPOSED METHODOLOGY & WORK


PLAN

SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE

EVAALUATION SHEET: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR MONTEGO BAY FREE ZONE

10 YEARS

OVER 15 YEARS

ONE PROJECT

TWO PROJECTS

THREE PROJECTS

APEC CONSULTANTS LTD.

ADeB CONSULTANTS LTD.

10

10
5

TYR DESIGNS

CARL C. CHEN & ASSOCIATES

10

KINGSLANDNSCOTT BAUER
ASSOCIATES.

7
2

7
2

TECHNICAL APPROACH & METHODOLOGY


Considerations
Understanding of Terms of Reference

10

Quality of proposal
Method of carrying out Activities

3
7

Main Activities
Content & Duration
Phasing & Interpretation
Milestones & Deliverables

4
3
1
2

9
20

17

14

18

16

16

WORK PLAN
Considerations

ORGANIZATION & STAFFING


Considerations
Structure & Composition of Team
Technical Support Staff

8
2

10

4
2
1
2

8
10
2

2
2
0
1

4
3
1
2

10

10

4
3
1
2

10

10

3
2
1
2

10

10

KEY PROFESSIONAL STAFF

GENERAL QUALIFICATION
ADEQUACY OF ASSIGNMENT

>15yrs
TEAM LEADER 15

10>yrs<15 Prof. Reg.

MSc.

BSc

15

ARCHITECT 10

3.5

1.5

STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.10

3.5

1.5

ELECTRICAL ENG.10

3.5

1.5

MECHANICAL ENG.10

3.5

1.5

QUANTITY SURVEYOR 5

2.5

0.5

18

17.25

10

14
16.95

10

14
16.65

7.5

10

10

10

7.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

16.35

ADEQUACY OF ASSIGNMENT
5 or more projects/ over
5 yrs experience

less than 5

TEAM LEADER

ARCHITECT

STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.

9
6

ELECTRICAL ENG.

MECHANICAL ENG.
QUANTITY SURVEYOR

5
4

3
2

5
4

5
4

5
4

5
4

5
4

36

9
36

9
7

36

9
36

9
36

6 years

5 or less

Language
-English

TEAM LEADER

ARCHITECT

STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.

ELECTRICAL ENG.

MECHANICAL ENG.

QUANTITY SURVEYOR

2
6

110
EVALUATOR 1

10

14
13.8

36

EXPERIENCE IN REGION & LANGUAGE


EXPERIENCE IN REGION &
LANGUAGE

KEY PROFESSIONAL STAFF QUALIFICATION & COMPETENCE FOR ASSIGNMENT

GENERAL QUALIFICATION

2
2

2
6

105.25

2
2

2
2

90.8

2
6

106.95

2
2

2
6

101.65

2
2

99.35

301768666.xls

POINTS

No. of years
Est.

No. of Similar
Projects
TECHNICAL
APPROACH &
METHODOLOG
Y
WORK PLAN
ORGANIZATIO
N & STAFFING

ADEQUACY OF THE PROPOSED METHODOLOGY & WORK


PLAN

SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE

EVAALUATION SHEET: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR MONTEGO BAY FREE ZONE

10 YEARS

OVER 15 YEARS

ONE PROJECT

TWO PROJECTS

THREE PROJECTS

TECHNICAL APPROACH & METHODOLOGY


Considerations
Understanding of Terms of Reference
Quality of proposal
Method of carrying out Activities

APEC CONSULTANTS LTD.

10

10
5

20

4
3
1
2

10

3
6

2.5

CARL C. CHEN & ASSOCIATES

10
5

18

TYR DESIGNS

10
5

10
3
7

ADeB CONSULTANTS LTD.

10
5

15.5

10
5

17

KINGSLANDNSCOTT BAUER
ASSOCIATES.

17

14

WORK PLAN
Considerations
Main Activities
Content & Duration
Phasing & Interpretation
Milestones & Deliverables

ORGANIZATION & STAFFING


Considerations
Structure & Composition of Team
Technical Support Staff

4
3
1
2

10

8
2

10
2

3
2.5
1
1

3
2
1
2

7.5

10

3.5
2
2
1

10

8.5

10

2.5
1.5
0.5
1

5.5

10

KEY PROFESSIONAL STAFF


GENERAL QUALIFICATION
GENERAL QUALIFICATION
ADEQUACY OF ASSIGNMENT

TEAM LEADER 15

10>yrs<15 Prof. Reg.

MSc.

BSc

ARCHITECT 10

3.5

1.5

15

STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.10

3.5

1.5

10

ELECTRICAL ENG.10

3.5

1.5

MECHANICAL ENG.10

3.5

1.5

QUANTITY SURVEYOR 5

2.5

0.5

18

7
17.25

14
13.8

10

14
16.95

10

14
16.65

7.5

10

10

10

7.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

16.35

ADEQUACY OF ASSIGNMENT
5 or more projects/ over 5 yrs
experience

less than 5

TEAM LEADER

ARCHITECT

STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.

ELECTRICAL ENG.

MECHANICAL ENG.
QUANTITY SURVEYOR

3
2

5
4

5
4

5
4

5
4

5
4

9
36

6 years

5 or less

TEAM LEADER

Language
-English
1

ARCHITECT

1
6

9
36

9
7

36

9
36

9
7

36

36

3
6.0

STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.

ELECTRICAL ENG.

MECHANICAL ENG.

QUANTITY SURVEYOR

110
EVALUATOR 2

EXPERIENCE IN REGION & LANGUAGE


EXPERIENCE IN REGION &
LANGUAGE

KEY PROFESSIONAL STAFF QUALIFICATION & COMPETENCE FOR ASSIGNMENT

>15yrs

107.25

98.8

103.95

101.2

97.85

301768666.xls

POINTS

No. of years
Est.

No. of Similar
Projects
TECHNICAL
APPROACH &
METHODOLOG
Y
WORK PLAN
ORGANIZATIO
N & STAFFING

ADEQUACY OF THE PROPOSED METHODOLOGY & WORK


PLAN

SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE

EVAALUATION SHEET: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR MONTEGO BAY FREE ZONE

10 YEARS

OVER 15 YEARS

ONE PROJECT

TWO PROJECTS

THREE PROJECTS

APEC CONSULTANTS
LTD.
5

ADeB CONSULTANTS LTD.

10

10
5

TYA DESIGNS

CARL C. CHEN & ASSOCIATES

10

10

KINGSLANDNSCOTT BAUER
ASSOCIATES.

10
5

10
5

TECHNICAL APPROACH & METHODOLOGY


Considerations
Understanding of Terms of Reference

10

Quality of proposal
Method of carrying out Activities

3
7

Main Activities
Content & Duration
Phasing & Interpretation
Milestones & Deliverables

4
3
1
2

7
20

15

19

16

12

WORK PLAN
Considerations

ORGANIZATION & STAFFING


Considerations
Structure & Composition of Team
Technical Support Staff

10

4
3
1
1

8
2

10
1

3
2
1
0

4
1
1
2

4
3
1
1

2
1
1
1

KEY PROFESSIONAL STAFF

GENERAL QUALIFICATION
ADEQUACY OF ASSIGNMENT

>15yrs
TEAM LEADER 15

10>yrs<15 Prof. Reg.

MSc.

BSc

15

ARCHITECT 10

3.5

1.5

STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.10

3.5

1.5

ELECTRICAL ENG.10

3.5

1.5

MECHANICAL ENG.10

3.5

1.5

QUANTITY SURVEYOR 5

2.5

0.5

18

17.25

10

14
16.95

10

14
16.65

7.5

10

10

10

7.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

16.35

ADEQUACY OF ASSIGNMENT
5 or more projects/ over 5 yrs
experience

less than 5

TEAM LEADER

ARCHITECT

STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.

ELECTRICAL ENG.

MECHANICAL ENG.
QUANTITY SURVEYOR

3
2

5
4

5
4

5
4

5
4

5
4

9
36

6 years

5 or less

TEAM LEADER

Language
-English
1

ARCHITECT

1
6

9
36

9
7

36

9
36

9
36

36

3
6

STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.

ELECTRICAL ENG.

MECHANICAL ENG.

QUANTITY SURVEYOR

110
EVALUATOR 3

10

14
13.8

EXPERIENCE IN REGION & LANGUAGE


EXPERIENCE IN REGION &
LANGUAGE

KEY PROFESSIONAL STAFF QUALIFICATION & COMPETENCE FOR ASSIGNMENT

GENERAL QUALIFICATION

100.25

88.8

103.95

101.65

92.35

301768666.xls

POINTS

No. of years
Est.
No. of Similar
Projects
TECHNICAL
APPROACH &
METHODOLOG
Y
WORK PLAN
ORGANIZATIO
N & STAFFING

ADEQUACY OF THE PROPOSED METHODOLOGY & WORK


PLAN

SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE

EVAALUATION SHEET: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR MONTEGO BAY FREE ZONE

10 YEARS

OVER 15 YEARS

ONE PROJECT

TWO PROJECTS

THREE PROJECTS

APEC CONSULTANTS
LTD.
5

ADeB CONSULTANTS LTD.

10

10
5

TYA DESIGNS

CARL C. CHEN & ASSOCIATES

10

10

KINGSLANDNSCOTT BAUER
ASSOCIATES.

10
5

10
5

TECHNICAL APPROACH & METHODOLOGY


Considerations
Understanding of Terms of Reference

10

Quality of proposal
Method of carrying out Activities

3
7

Main Activities
Content & Duration
Phasing & Interpretation
Milestones & Deliverables

4
3
1
2

8
20

17

1.5

12.5

18

16

16

WORK PLAN
Considerations

ORGANIZATION & STAFFING


Considerations
Structure & Composition of Team
Technical Support Staff

8
2

10

4
3
1
2

10

7
10
2

3
2
1
0

4
2
1
2

4
3
1
1

2
2
1
2

KEY PROFESSIONAL STAFF

GENERAL QUALIFICATION
ADEQUACY OF ASSIGNMENT

>15yrs 10>yrs<15 Prof. Reg.


TEAM LEADER-15

MSc.

BSc

15

ARCHITECT-10

3.5

1.5

STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.-10

3.5

1.5

ELECTRICAL ENG.10

3.5

1.5

MECHANICAL ENG.-10

3.5

1.5

QUANTITY SURVEYOR-5

2.5

0.5

18

17.25

10

14
16.95

10

14
16.65

7.5

10

10

10

7.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

4.5

16.35

ADEQUACY OF ASSIGNMENT
5 or more projects/ over 5 yrs
experience

less than 5

TEAM LEADER

ARCHITECT

STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.

ELECTRICAL ENG.

MECHANICAL ENG.
QUANTITY SURVEYOR

9
36

9
36

9
7

36

9
36

9
36

6 years

5 or less

TEAM LEADER

Language
-English
1

ARCHITECT

STRUCTURAL / CIVIL ENG.

ELECTRICAL ENG.

MECHANICAL ENG.

QUANTITY SURVEYOR

3
6

110
EVALUATOR 4

10

14
13.8

36

EXPERIENCE IN REGION & LANGUAGE


EXPERIENCE IN REGION &
LANGUAGE

KEY PROFESSIONAL STAFF QUALIFICATION & COMPETENCE FOR ASSIGNMENT

GENERAL QUALIFICATION

3
6

105.25

3
6

92.3

3
6

104.95

3
6

101.65

99.35

CONSULTANT NAME

APEC

ADeB

TYA

KINGSLAND
SCOTT

CARL CHEN

EVALUATOR1
EVALUATOR2
EVALUATOR3
EVALUATOR4

105

91

107

102

99

107

93

104

101

98

98

89

104

102

95

105

92

105

102

99

TOTAL AVERAGE SCORE

104

91

105

102

98

RANK

Technical (Quality) Weighted


Tech Score

Weighted
Quality
Score

Consultant
105

105 x 60
110

57.3

APEC Consultants

104

56.7

Carl Chen Associates

102

Kingsland Scott Bauer


Assocs.

98

104 x 60
110
102 x 60
110
98 x 60
110

ADeB Consultants

91

91 x 60
110

49.7

Tya Design

55.4
53.4

Cost Score Weighting


Financial Offer

Weighted
Financial
Score

Financial Score
TYA
APEC
CARL CHEN
KINGSLAND SCOTT
ADeB

CONSULTANT NAME
TYA
APEC
CARL CHEN
KINGSLAND SCOTT
ADeB

88,526,250.00 40,939,072.46x40
88526250
46,000,000.00 40,939,072.46x40
46000000
51,350,000.00 40,939,072.46x40
51530000
US$471,757.00 40,939,072.46x40
or
40,939,072
J$40,939,072.46

18.50

49,909,016.00 40,939,072.46x40
49,909,016

32.81

Weighted
Quality Score
57.3

35.60
31.89
40.00

Weighted
Total Score
Financial Score
18.50
75.8

56.7

35.60

92.3

55.4

31.89

87.3

53.4

40.00

93.4

49.7

32.81

82.5

You might also like