Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outline
Impact of I/I
Study to Measure I/I in Tennessee
3 Methods
Results
Economics: Costs and cost recovery
Rehabilitation example - Brentwood
The Effect of I/I May Depend on the Capacity of the Collection System
Limited Capacity
Excess Capacity
HIGH
> SSOs
> backups
> SSOs
LOW
> backups
> deterioration of pipes due to
movement of soil fines
Study Purposes
Provide reliable I/I data to policymakers (hoping) to
stimulate a new statewide I/I control strategy
Demonstrate simple, inexpensive techniques
Value of existing data sources
BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand) dilution as an
I/I indicator
Develop a tool for operators to calculate I/I
Public Resources
DMRs (discharge monitoring reports)
monthly average information
State MORs (monthly operating reports)
daily information
Existing data
Operators collect daily!
235
685 mgd
3 898 mg/l
62,353 MG
500
400
300
200
100
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Average Domestic
BOD ~ 350 mg/l
Missing
0.5
No BOD
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0 1/1/12
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
2/1/12
3/1/12
4/1/12
5/1/12
6/1/12
7/1/12
rain
8/1/12
flow
20
4.5
18
16
3.5
14
3
12
2.5
10
2
8
1
0.5
0
1/1/12
0
2/1/12
3/1/12
4/1/12
5/1/12
rain
6/1/12
7/1/12
flow
8/1/12
9/1/12
10/1/12
11/1/12 12/1/12
22
20
18
9
8
16
14
6
12
5
10
8
0
1/1/12
0
2/1/12
3/1/12
4/1/12
5/1/12
rain
6/1/12
7/1/12
flow
8/1/12
9/1/12
10/1/12
11/1/12 12/1/12
22
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
Bristol
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
ANNUAL AVERAGE
44.5% I/I
Transformation Procedure
KT-WPC July 2009
Water Environment & Technology, Sep 2009
Transformation
Influent
2-day
rain
12/23
0.036
12/24
0.035
0.038
1.05
0.002
12/26
0.2
1.05
0.165
12/27
0.128
12/28
0.086
Date
12/25
Rain
1.05
2nd day
RDII
25
20
ONLY WET
SEASON
EVENTS!
15
10
y = 5.5781x - 0.7473
R = 0.655
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
30
25
20
Remaining Plant
Capacity ~ 8.4 mgd
15
10
5
0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
30
25
20
Remaining Plant
Capacity ~ 8.4 mgd
15
10
5
2-year storm:
~3.4 inches
0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
250
ANNUAL AVERAGE
47.7 Days
100
50
0
Bristol
I/I Economics
Cost of I/I in Tennessee
Is about $200 million/year
700
600
500
(System Approach:
Address PIPES, LATERALS, & MANHOLES!)
400
300
200
100
0
0
10,000
Nashville
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
plot
Linear (plot)
60,000
Rehab Cost
55,650 MG / 0.006 MG/ ft = 1,756 miles of
rehab
1,756 miles x $0.6 million/mile* ~ $ 1.05 billion
(* COST INCLUDES LATERALS, MANHOLES, DESIGN, & SSES)
Payback:
$1.05 billion rehab/ $100 million O&M/year
= ~ 10 to 11 years
Brentwood Rehabilitation
System (Little Harpeth Sewershed)
155 miles of pipe
4,000 manholes
Rehabilitation
Lined 32 miles of pipe (~21%)
Sealed and lined 1,400 manholes
Rehabilitated 320 laterals
Results
Eliminated 886 MG I/I per year (52%)
Saved $1.3 million annually
2010 Flood
Conclusions - Management
Paradigm shift is needed to step beyond
compliance monitoring
Implement Life Cycle Analysis
Electronic records
Operator training more on BOD & sampling
Guidance on Rehabilitation Programs
Public education
Acknowledgments
Tennessee Division of Water Resources personnel:
For their daily service, and assistance in
gathering MOR reports for this study
Cartoon illustrations from: Operation & Maintenance
of Wastewater Collection Systems (Ken Kerri
& John Brady Sacramento State course
US EPA)
City of Brentwood, Tennessee
Barge Waggoner Sumner & Cannon
QUESTIONS ?
Narrative results and
list of references
available after webinar.
George Kurz, P.E., DEE
615-714-6120
George.kurz@comcast.net
www.sewercapacitymanagement.weebly.com