Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presented by
Lars Kornstaedt
Manager A380 Operational Performance
Airbus Perspective
Pushing for Regulatory Harmonization on Landing
March 2010
Contents
EASA / FAA Regulation Comparison
Runway Condition Reporting
TALPA ARC Proposals
Airbus Commitment
Remaining Issues
Conclusion
Airbus Perspective
March 2010
Page 2
Regulatory Situation
Certification
Dry
Runway Performance
Restrictions on operations
Recommends performance adjustments to be applied
Airbus Perspective
March 2010
FAR:
EU-OPS:
Airbus Perspective
March 2010
EU-OPS 1.400
March 2010
Contents
EASA / FAA Regulation Comparison
Runway Condition Reporting
TALPA ARC Proposals
Airbus Commitment
Remaining Issues
Conclusion
Airbus Perspective
March 2010
Page 6
Observation
Disadvantages
AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
May
Airbus Perspective
March 2010
Page 7
Friction Measurement
Advantages
Precise
Numbers
No need for preceding aircraft
Disadvantages
No
Airbus Perspective
March 2010
Page 8
Advantages
Usually
Disadvantages
Subjective
assessment
Pilot experience
Aircraft characteristics
Mix
March 2010
Page 9
Contaminant
Type and Depth
Friction Coefficient
and/or Braking Action
- SNOWTAMS are snapshot data, no prediction or forecast
- ATIS, METAR, TAF do not contain runway condition
information
- ATC reporting practices are variable and inconsistent
16th Flight Safety Conference
15-18 March
Slide
2010
10
Page 10
Contents
EASA / FAA Regulation Comparison
Runway Condition Reporting
TALPA ARC Proposals
Airbus Commitment
Remaining Issues
Conclusion
Airbus Perspective
March 2010
Page 11
Air Distance
Representative Friction
All physical effects considered
Standardized
Airbus Perspective
March 2010
Page 12
6
March 2010
Page 13
Code
6
Runway Contaminant
Dry
Wet (Smooth, Grooved or PFC)
Frost
1/8" or less of:
Water
Slush
Dry Snow
Wet Snow
At or below -13C:
Compacted Snow
Wet (Slippery)
At or below -3 C:
Dry or Wet Snow greater than 1/8
Above -13C and at or below -3C:
Compacted Snow
Greater than 1/8 of:
Water
Slush
Above -3 C:
Dry or Wet Snow greater than 1/8
Compacted Snow
At or below -3C:
Ice
Wet Ice
Water on top of Compacted Snow
Dry or Wet Snow over Ice
Above -3C:
Ice
Airbus Perspective
Rep. Mu ()
PIREP
Dry
0.40
or higher
GOOD
0.39-0.35
GOOD TO MEDIUM
= 0.20
0.34-0.30
MEDIUM
= 0.16
0.29-0.25
MEDIUM TO POOR
0.24-0.21
POOR
0.20
or lower
Nil
wet runway
March 2010
Page 14
Contents
EASA / FAA Regulation Comparison
Runway Condition Reporting
TALPA ARC Proposals
Airbus Commitment
Remaining Issues
Conclusion
Airbus Perspective
March 2010
Page 15
Airbus Commitment
We support the TALPA ARC proposals
Strong
Airbus Perspective
March 2010
Page 16
Distance on Wet
Distance on Contaminated
Airbus Perspective
March 2010
Page 17
and depths
Some contaminant types and depths covered by
equivalences (dry and wet loose snow)
Airbus Perspective
March 2010
Page 18
OLD
ALD
DIFFERENCE OLD - ALD
DRY
DRY
+210 M
+22 %
GOOD
WET
+160 M
+13 %
GOOD TO COMPACT
+110 M
+8 %
MEDIUM
SNOW
MEDIUM
SLUSH 1/4"
+410 M
+23 %
TO POOR
POOR
ICE
-520 M
-23 %
Differences:
Dry
March 2010
Page 19
Contents
EASA / FAA Regulation Comparison
Runway Condition Reporting
TALPA ARC solutions
Airbus Commitment
Remaining Issues
Conclusion
Airbus Perspective
March 2010
Page 20
No Rev
No Rev
GOOD - WET
With Rev
GOOD to MEDIUM With Rev
SNOW
MEDIUM - SNOW
With Rev
With Rev
WEIGHT
40
53
66
40
53
66
40
53
66
40
53
66
40
53
66
40
53
66
40
53
66
40
53
66
Zp (DISA=0; Slope=0)
0
4000
8000 10000
-27%
-26%
-25%
-25%
-26%
-25%
-24%
-24%
-28%
-28%
-28%
-28%
-25%
-22%
-19%
-17%
-21%
-17%
-14%
-13%
-19%
-19%
-18%
-17%
-30%
-28%
-25%
-24%
-26%
-23%
-20%
-19%
-24%
-24%
-24%
-23%
-18%
-15%
-13%
-13%
-13%
-11%
-12%
-13%
-13%
-15%
-15%
-15%
-11%
-8%
-5%
-5%
-5%
-3%
-3%
-4%
-5%
-6%
-7%
-7%
-8%
-4%
1%
4%
0%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
-8%
-4%
0%
0%
0%
3%
1%
0%
5%
4%
1%
0%
-21%
-23%
-25%
-26%
-22%
-24%
-26%
-27%
-22%
-24%
-27%
-28%
Zp (DISA=15; Slope=0)
0
4000
8000 10000
-25%
-23%
-22%
-22%
-23%
-22%
-21%
-21%
-24%
-25%
-25%
-25%
-21%
-18%
-15%
-13%
-17%
-13%
-10%
-8%
-15%
-14%
-13%
-12%
-27%
-24%
-21%
-20%
-23%
-20%
-16%
-15%
-21%
-21%
-20%
-19%
-15%
-12%
-9%
-9%
-10%
-7%
-8%
-9%
-10%
-11%
-11%
-11%
-8%
-5%
-1%
-1%
-2%
1%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-2%
-2%
-4%
1%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
-4%
1%
5%
5%
5%
9%
7%
6%
11%
10%
7%
6%
-17%
-20%
-22%
-23%
-18%
-21%
-23%
-24%
-19%
-21%
-23%
-24%
Zp (DISA=30; Slope=0)
0
4000
8000 10000
-22%
-21%
-19%
-19%
-20%
-19%
-18%
-18%
-21%
-21%
-22%
-22%
-18%
-14%
-11%
-9%
-13%
-9%
-5%
-3%
-11%
-10%
-9%
-7%
-24%
-21%
-18%
-16%
-19%
-16%
-12%
-10%
-17%
-17%
-15%
-14%
-11%
-8%
-5%
-5%
-6%
-3%
-4%
-5%
-6%
-7%
-7%
-7%
-4%
-1%
3%
4%
2%
6%
6%
5%
3%
2%
2%
2%
0%
4%
4%
4%
5%
4%
4%
5%
4%
4%
4%
4%
0%
6%
11%
11%
11%
15%
13%
12%
16%
16%
13%
12%
-14%
-16%
-18%
-19%
-15%
-17%
-19%
-20%
-15%
-17%
-19%
-21%
Zp (DISA=0;
0
4000
-26%
-25%
-25%
-24%
-27%
-27%
-23%
-20%
-19%
-16%
-17%
-17%
-29%
-27%
-25%
-22%
-23%
-23%
-16%
-13%
-11%
-9%
-11%
-12%
-9%
-6%
-2%
0%
-2%
-3%
-5%
-1%
4%
8%
8%
8%
-5%
-1%
4%
7%
10%
8%
-17%
-19%
-17%
-19%
-18%
-20%
Slope=-1%)
8000 10000
-24%
-24%
-23%
-23%
-27%
-27%
-17%
-16%
-12%
-10%
-16%
-15%
-24%
-22%
-19%
-17%
-22%
-21%
-11%
-10%
-9%
-10%
-13%
-13%
-3%
-2%
0%
-1%
-3%
-3%
5%
8%
8%
9%
8%
9%
3%
3%
6%
4%
6%
4%
-21%
-22%
-22%
-23%
-22%
-23%
Zp (DISA=15;
0
4000
-24%
-22%
-22%
-21%
-23%
-24%
-20%
-16%
-15%
-11%
-13%
-12%
-26%
-23%
-21%
-18%
-19%
-19%
-12%
-10%
-7%
-5%
-7%
-8%
-5%
-2%
2%
5%
2%
1%
-1%
4%
8%
8%
8%
8%
-1%
4%
9%
13%
15%
14%
-13%
-15%
-14%
-16%
-14%
-16%
Slope=-1%)
8000 10000
-21%
-21%
-20%
-20%
-24%
-24%
-13%
-11%
-7%
-5%
-11%
-10%
-20%
-18%
-15%
-13%
-18%
-17%
-7%
-7%
-5%
-6%
-9%
-9%
2%
2%
5%
4%
1%
1%
8%
8%
8%
9%
9%
9%
9%
9%
11%
10%
12%
10%
-17%
-18%
-18%
-19%
-18%
-19%
Zp (DISA=0;
0
4000
-26%
-24%
-24%
-23%
-26%
-26%
-22%
-19%
-17%
-14%
-15%
-15%
-28%
-25%
-23%
-20%
-21%
-21%
-14%
-11%
-8%
-6%
-8%
-10%
-6%
-3%
1%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
3%
8%
13%
13%
13%
-2%
3%
8%
12%
14%
13%
-11%
-14%
-12%
-14%
-12%
-14%
Slope=-2%)
8000 10000
-23%
-23%
-22%
-22%
-26%
-26%
-15%
-14%
-10%
-8%
-13%
-12%
-22%
-21%
-17%
-15%
-20%
-19%
-8%
-8%
-6%
-8%
-10%
-10%
1%
1%
4%
3%
0%
0%
9%
12%
13%
14%
14%
14%
7%
7%
10%
9%
11%
10%
-16%
-17%
-16%
-17%
-16%
-17%
For
Zp (DISA=15;
0
4000
-23%
-22%
-21%
-20%
-22%
-22%
-18%
-15%
-13%
-9%
-11%
-10%
-25%
-22%
-20%
-16%
-17%
-17%
-10%
-7%
-5%
-2%
-4%
-6%
-2%
2%
5%
8%
6%
5%
3%
8%
13%
13%
13%
13%
3%
8%
14%
18%
20%
20%
-8%
-10%
-8%
-10%
-8%
-10%
Airbus Perspective
Marc h 2010
Page 21
Slope=-2%)
8000 10000
-20%
-20%
-19%
-19%
-23%
-23%
-11%
-9%
-5%
-3%
-8%
-7%
-19%
-17%
-13%
-11%
-16%
-15%
-4%
-4%
-2%
-3%
-6%
-6%
5%
6%
8%
7%
5%
5%
12%
12%
13%
14%
14%
14%
13%
13%
16%
15%
17%
16%
-12%
-13%
-12%
-13%
-12%
-13%
No Rev
No Rev
GOOD - WET
With Rev
GOOD to MEDIUM With Rev
SNOW
MEDIUM - SNOW
With Rev
With Rev
WEIGHT
40
53
66
40
53
66
40
53
66
40
53
66
40
53
66
40
53
66
40
53
66
40
53
66
Zp (DISA=0; Slope=0)
0
4000
8000 10000
-16%
-15%
-14%
-13%
-15%
-14%
-13%
-12%
-17%
-18%
-18%
-17%
-13%
-10%
-7%
-5%
-9%
-5%
-1%
1%
-7%
-7%
-6%
-5%
-20%
-17%
-14%
-12%
-15%
-12%
-8%
-7%
-13%
-13%
-12%
-11%
-5%
-3%
0%
0%
0%
2%
2%
1%
0%
-2%
-2%
-2%
2%
5%
9%
9%
9%
12%
11%
10%
9%
8%
7%
8%
5%
10%
16%
20%
15%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
19%
20%
5%
10%
15%
15%
15%
19%
17%
15%
21%
20%
16%
15%
-9%
-11%
-14%
-15%
-10%
-13%
-15%
-16%
-11%
-13%
-16%
-17%
Zp (DISA=15; Slope=0)
0
4000
8000 10000
-13%
-12%
-11%
-10%
-12%
-10%
-9%
-9%
-13%
-14%
-14%
-14%
-10%
-6%
-2%
0%
-4%
0%
4%
6%
-2%
-2%
0%
1%
-16%
-13%
-10%
-8%
-11%
-8%
-4%
-2%
-9%
-9%
-8%
-7%
-2%
1%
4%
5%
4%
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
2%
6%
10%
13%
14%
13%
17%
16%
15%
14%
12%
12%
13%
10%
16%
19%
19%
20%
20%
20%
20%
19%
19%
20%
20%
10%
16%
21%
21%
21%
25%
23%
22%
27%
26%
23%
21%
-5%
-7%
-10%
-11%
-6%
-9%
-11%
-12%
-7%
-9%
-12%
-13%
Zp (DISA=30; Slope=0)
0
4000
8000 10000
-10%
-9%
-7%
-7%
-9%
-7%
-6%
-6%
-9%
-10%
-10%
-10%
-6%
-1%
3%
5%
0%
5%
9%
12%
3%
3%
5%
6%
-13%
-9%
-5%
-3%
-7%
-3%
1%
3%
-5%
-4%
-3%
-1%
2%
5%
9%
9%
8%
11%
11%
10%
8%
7%
7%
7%
10%
14%
18%
19%
18%
22%
21%
20%
18%
17%
17%
18%
16%
20%
19%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
19%
20%
20%
16%
22%
27%
27%
27%
32%
30%
28%
34%
33%
30%
28%
-1%
-3%
-6%
-7%
-2%
-4%
-7%
-8%
-3%
-5%
-7%
-9%
Zp (DISA=0;
0
4000
-15%
-14%
-14%
-13%
-16%
-16%
-12%
-8%
-7%
-3%
-5%
-4%
-19%
-16%
-13%
-10%
-11%
-11%
-3%
0%
3%
5%
3%
1%
5%
9%
12%
15%
13%
11%
9%
14%
20%
25%
24%
25%
9%
14%
20%
23%
26%
25%
-4%
-7%
-5%
-7%
-5%
-8%
Slope=-1%)
8000 10000
-13%
-12%
-12%
-11%
-16%
-16%
-5%
-3%
1%
3%
-3%
-2%
-12%
-11%
-7%
-5%
-10%
-9%
3%
3%
5%
3%
0%
0%
12%
13%
15%
14%
11%
11%
21%
24%
25%
25%
25%
25%
19%
19%
21%
20%
21%
20%
-9%
-10%
-10%
-11%
-10%
-12%
Zp (DISA=15;
0
4000
-12%
-11%
-11%
-9%
-12%
-12%
-8%
-4%
-2%
2%
0%
1%
-15%
-12%
-9%
-6%
-7%
-7%
1%
4%
7%
10%
7%
5%
9%
13%
17%
20%
18%
16%
14%
20%
24%
25%
24%
24%
14%
20%
26%
30%
33%
32%
0%
-2%
-1%
-3%
-1%
-3%
Slope=-1%)
8000 10000
-9%
-9%
-8%
-8%
-12%
-12%
0%
2%
6%
9%
2%
4%
-8%
-6%
-2%
0%
-5%
-4%
7%
7%
9%
8%
5%
5%
17%
18%
20%
19%
16%
16%
24%
24%
25%
25%
25%
25%
25%
25%
28%
27%
28%
27%
-5%
-6%
-6%
-7%
-6%
-7%
Zp (DISA=0;
0
4000
-14%
-13%
-13%
-11%
-14%
-15%
-10%
-6%
-5%
-1%
-2%
-2%
-17%
-14%
-12%
-8%
-9%
-9%
-1%
2%
5%
8%
6%
4%
9%
12%
16%
20%
17%
15%
13%
18%
24%
30%
30%
30%
13%
18%
24%
29%
31%
30%
2%
-1%
2%
-1%
2%
-1%
Slope=-2%)
8000 10000
-12%
-11%
-11%
-10%
-15%
-15%
-3%
-1%
4%
6%
0%
1%
-11%
-9%
-5%
-3%
-8%
-7%
5%
6%
8%
6%
3%
3%
16%
17%
19%
18%
15%
15%
25%
29%
30%
31%
31%
31%
23%
23%
27%
25%
27%
26%
-3%
-5%
-3%
-5%
-4%
-5%
Zp (DISA=15;
0
4000
-11%
-10%
-9%
-8%
-10%
-11%
-6%
-2%
0%
4%
3%
4%
-14%
-10%
-8%
-4%
-5%
-5%
3%
6%
10%
13%
10%
8%
13%
17%
21%
25%
22%
21%
18%
24%
29%
30%
30%
30%
18%
24%
31%
36%
38%
38%
6%
4%
6%
4%
6%
4%
On
Slope=-2%)
8000 10000
-8%
-8%
-7%
-7%
-11%
-11%
2%
5%
9%
12%
5%
7%
-6%
-4%
0%
3%
-3%
-2%
10%
10%
12%
11%
8%
8%
21%
22%
25%
24%
20%
21%
28%
29%
30%
31%
31%
32%
30%
30%
34%
32%
35%
34%
1%
0%
1%
0%
1%
0%
March 2010
Page 22
OLD
Airbus Perspective
March 2010
dispatch only
JAA A320 CRI-F12
Generic friction coefficient
Benefit applied to wet runway dispatch
FAA
AC 121-195(d)-1A
March 2010
Conclusions
The Operational Landing Distances are the future of inflight landing performance assessment worldwide
However, their introduction by the FAA will increase the
differences with European regulation
Requirements, Computation Methods and Margins should
be harmonized
Runway condition reporting must be standardized to
avoid confusion
Differences
Introduce safety risks
Increase cost of certification and operation
Harm level playing field for manufacturers and operators
Airbus Perspective
March 2010
Page 25
Airbus Perspective
March 2010
Page 26