i a
e@
“Mare Toberoff (CA State Bar No. 188537)
Rafael Gomez-Cabrera (CA State Bur No. 29744)
Jefftey B. Linden (CA State Bar No. 224761)
Nicholas C, Williamson (Ca State Bar No. 231124)
UAW OFFICES OF MARC TOBEROFF, PLC
1999 Avenue ofthe Stars, Suite 1540
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310) 246-3333,
Facsimile: (310) 246-3101
Aomeys for Pais
oan Slegel and Latta Siegel Larson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JOANNE SIEGEL, an individuals and | Civil CaseNo.__ vad
LAURA SIEGEL LARSON, an individual, .
Piainiff, COMPLAINT FOR:
| DUDECLARATORY RELIEF RE:
= TERMINATION, 17 US.C5304(),
[2] DECLARATORY RELIEF RE
WARNER BROS, ENTERTAINMENT PROFITS;
INC. corporation, TIME WARNER INC, | [3] DECLARATORY RELIEF RE
deomoration DECOMICS INC,a | USEOF"S” CREST;
| corporation; and DOES 1-10, | (4) ACCOUNTING FoR Prost;
{s] WASTE OF JOINTLY OWNED
Defendants COPYRIGHTS;
{6] VIOLATION OF LANHAM ACT
1SUSC.§1125,
(7) VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS AND PROFESSICNAL
CODE §§ 17200 ET SEO.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIA
Plaintiffs JOANNE SIEGEL and LAURA SIEGEL LARSON (hereinafter the
+Pleinsiffs", by and through their atomey of record, hereby allege as follows:
RISDICTION AND VEN ay
1. This is acivil action seeking declaratory relief, accounting for profits, remedies
fr violations of the Lanham Act and violations of California unfair competition laws and
Coan for Deciory Ree, Accounting, Laahams AS Visors asd Usk Competione ®
1 related claims arising out of Plaintiff" termination of prior grants of copyright in and to the
‘original character and work known as “Superman” and subsequent "Superman" works
3] pursuant tothe United States Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 304(c), and defendants’
44 itll misconduct with respect thereto.
‘This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims st forth inthis
6 || Complaint pursuant tothe United States Copyright Act (hereinafter, the “Copyright Act"), 17
aiuse. $101 et al. and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a) and 1332
8 3. This Court has supplemental jrisdietion ove the related tate claims herein in
4] hat these claims form part ofthe same case and contoversy asthe federal clin hein.
10 44. This Court has persona jurisdiction over the defendants in that defendants are
11 | regulary doing busines inthe State of California an in this Dist, and because a
12] sebsanial par ofthe relevant act complained of herein occured in the State of California
13]] and this Disc.
4 5. Venue is proper in the United States District Court forthe Cental Dstriet of
1|| catfomia pursuant 028 U.S.C. §§ 1391() and (e and 1400(0.
18) PARTIES
7 6. Plainiff JOANNE SIEGEL (hereinafter “Joanne Siegel" isan individual and
18} |iizen of and cesides in the State of California inthe County of Los Angeles, nds and a all
19] mes has been a citizen ofthe United States, Joanne Siege isthe widow of famedcomic
20]) book crestor Jerome (ake, “Jer Siege.
a 7, Plaintiff LAURA SIEGEL LARSON (hereinafter “Laura Siegel” isan
22) individual and a citizen of and resides inthe State of California, in the County of Los Angeles,
23] andi and at ll ies hasbeen a citizen ofthe United States. Laura Siogel isthe daghier of |
24|]serome Sieset
as 8, Plaintfs are informed and believe and based thereon allege that defendant
26|] WARNER BROS, ENTERTAINMENT INC. (herenafer “Warner Bros") is acomoration
27] organized and exiting under the laws ofthe State of Delaware, which has is prne pal pace
208
2
Capa os Desnatony Rel Aouating, Laxbam Art Viton ad Una Conpeison® &
ot business in Los Angeles County, Califomia. Warer Bros. isa wholly owned susidary of
Defendant TIME WARNER INC.
9, Plants are informed and believe and based thereon allege that Defendant DC
LCOMMCS INC. hersnater“DC") is corporation organized and existing under the laws of
the State of New York, which as its principal place of business inthe State of New York: and
‘hat DC regulary conducts significant busines in he State of Califoia and inthe County of
Los Angeles. DC is also a wholly owned subsidiary of fendant Warner Bros.
10. Pais re informed and believe and based thereon allege that on or about
eptember 30, 1946, the New York corporations, Detective Comies, In, Supermaa, In. All
American Comics, Ine, Jolaine Publications, Ine, Wonderwoman Publishing, Inc, Hop
Hasrigan Enterprise nc, Gainle Publishing Co, Ine, IR, Publishing Co, ne, Worlds Best
Comics, ne. and Trafalgar Printing Co, Ine were consolidated ito the New York
cerporation National Comics Publications, ine. the name of which was later changed to
National Periods! Publications, Ine, and eventually DC Commies, Ie nd fart that DC,
Wamer Bros. nd Time Warmer, andor each of hem, ae the alleged succesto()}n-ineest
to National Peciodial Publications, In
11, Pie are informed and believe and based thereon allege that Defendant
FTIME WARNER INC. (hereinafter “Time Warr’ i corporation organized and exiting
under the lnvs ofthe State of Dewar, which has its comporate headquarters in the State of
the State
‘New York, and that Time Wamer regularly conducts sgntiant ongoing busine
of California and in the County of Los Angeles. Time Wameris the parent compaty ofboth
Warmer Bros and DC. (Time Wamer, Wamer Bros. and DC are sometimes cllecively
refered to hereinafter asthe “Defendants” and each reference to Defendants shall also refer
1» each Defenday 269
12, Plaintiffs are informed and believe and based thereon allege that Defendant DC
never, or rarely, exploits “Superman,” independently ofits controlling parent company,
‘Warmer Bros; that even celatively linear functions such as “Superman” licensing are not
hendled directly by DC, but are exploited exclusively rough Wamer Bros.; thatthe
3
Cop for Desaraty Ral, Asvounig, [asl At Violations 25d Uni Compeion