Article III. Section 1. II. Substantive Due Process
JMM Promotion and Management Inc. v. CA 260 SCRA 319 FACTS: After the death of Maricris Sioson in 1991, former President Corazon C. Aquino ordered a total ban against the deployment of performing artists to Japan and other foreign destinations but this ban was eventually rescinded after leaders of the overseas employment industry promised to extend full support for a program aimed at removing kinks in the system of deployment. The Secretary of Labor and Employment then issued Department Order No. 28, creating the Entertainment Industry Advisory Council (EIAC), which was tasked with issuing guidelines on the training, testing certification and deployment of performing artists abroad. Later on, Department Order No. 3 was created. This established the actual procedures and requirements for screening performing artists under a new system of training, testing, certification and deployment. After passing all the tests, an Artist's Record Book (ARB), a necessary prerequisite to processing of any contract of employment by the POEA, will be issued to them. The Federation of Entertainment Talent Managers of the Philippines (FETMOP) assailed these department orders for 1) violating the constitutional right to travel; 2) abridging existing contracts for employment; and 3) depriving individual artists of their licenses without due process of law. FETMOP also argued that the issuance of the Artist Record Book (ARB) was discriminatory and illegal and "in gross violation of the constitutional right... to life liberty and property." JMM Promotion and Management, Inc. Kary International, Inc. filed a Motion for Intervention in said civil case, which was granted. ISSUES: W/N the issuance of DO No. 3 and the ARB is a valid exercise of police power HELD: Yes, the issuance of DO No. 3 and the ARB is a valid exercise of police power. Police power is the power to interfere with personal liberty or property through government enactments in order to promote the general welfare or the common good. In 1984, the Philippines became largest labor sending country in Asia. Women composed almost half of those deployed. Most of the women, employed as domestic helpers and entertainers, worked under conditions "marked by physical and personal abuse." Because of the fact that many Filipina performing artists ended up as prostitutes abroad and a few of them even ended up dead, the government wanted to deploy only those who met set standards which would qualify them as legitimate performing artists. The welfare of the Filipino performing artists, especially women, was the reason for the issuance of Department Order No. 3. It is good to note that the selection of performing artists is usually done through audition. Those who are unfit are usually eliminated through a very subjective and biased process. The ARB requirement goes one step further. It tries to minimize the subjectivity of the process by defining the minimum skills required from entertainers and performing artists. The tests are aimed at segregating real artists or performers from those who are not and just eager to accept any available job, exposing themselves to possible exploitation. As to the other provisions of Department Order No. 3 questioned by petitioners, there is nothing wrong with the requirements for document and booking confirmation (D.O. 3-C), a minimum salary scale (D.O. 3-E), or the requirement for registration of returning performers. The requirement for a venue certificate or other documents allows the government to monitor the foreign employers and keep our entertainers away from worksites associated with immoral, illegal or exploitative practices. A profession is a property right. However, no right is absolute. The proper regulation of a profession has always been upheld as a legitimate subject of a valid exercise of the police power by the state particularly when their conduct affects either the execution of legitimate governmental functions, the preservation of the State, the public health and welfare, and public morals.