Professional Documents
Culture Documents
cancer patients
#### Here?Nisha A.
2 Stefanie
2 Richard
2 Helmy
Mohindra, MD1 Becky Nagy
MSMortimer,
LGC,2Dragan
Bahram
Kermani,
PhD,Mei,
PhD,Siew,
MD,Eltoukhy,
Eltoukhy,
Stefanie
Sebisanovic,
Gangwu
Benjamin Mortimer,
J. Schiller, LaiMun
Aubrey Lanman,
Zapanta, Helmy
AmirAli
Talasaz PhD,2
Guardant Health Inc., Redwood
City, CA PhD,2 Jyoti D. Patel, MD1
AmirAli Talasaz,
1 Northwestern University, Chicago IL, 2 Guardant Health, Inc, Redwood City, CA
Results
Introduction
We have shown that our Digital Sequencing Technology (DST) enables ultra-sensitive and ultra-specific detection of rare genomic abnormalities at the single molecule level. Standard
next-gen workflows are plagued by extremely high noise and distortion in sample-prep and sequencing. DST is able to eliminate the error and distortion created by these processes and
produce near-perfect representation of all rare variants. Moreover, our Digital Sequencing workflow enables unprecedented sensitivity as the vast majority of input DNA molecules are
converted to sequencing libraries regardless of length, content or input amount, enabling high-quality, high-diversity sequencing. We compared the sensitivity-specificity of conventional
Illumina SBS sequencing versus DST. We have shown that in sequencing a comprehensive cancer panel of 80kbps in 0.1% cancer cell line titration samples, standard SBS generates a
plethora of high-quality false positives (i.e. overlapped paired-end read
TMbases with Qscore>30) with MAFs of 0.05-5%, while DST results in completely error-free detection of every true
positive without a single false-positive (Figure 2).
We confirmed our ability for ultra-sensitive and specific detection of genomic
Limit 1
of Detection based on LNCap titrations
2
2 DNA from a cancer cell line (LNCaP) into a disease2
abnormalities by titrating cell-free
free cell-free DNA sample at ranges from 30%-0.1%. Our data shows the impressive
ability of DST to monitor 2single-nucleotide variations reliably down
2
2
1 to below 0.1% without
any false positives (Figure 3).
100
Introduction
Next-Generation Sequencing
TM
AKT1
is summarized
in the
table below.
ALKclinical performance
APC
AR
AFAR
ARID1A ATM
BRCA1
BRCA2
CCND1
CDKN2A
CDKN2B
CTNNB1 EGFR
Figure 1: Workflow for deep sequencing of cell-free DNA using Digital Sequencing technology. This
technology enables true-high quality sequencing through Guardant Healths single-molecule library
preparation, digital sequencing and bioinformatics.
Diagnosis
of lung
adenocarcinoma
Multiple
QNS Biopsies
Biopsy Bone
3/2015
Patient started on
Crizotinib
Initial Response
followed with
2 cycles of
Pemetrexed
9/2013-2/2014
Carboplatin/
pemetrexed x4;
maintenance therapy
Carboplatin/
Pemetrexed
4 Cycles
6/2014
2/2015
Blood Sample
Guardant360
August 2015
Dramatic Response to
Crizotinib (Figure 4)
6/2014
Upon
progression,
gamma knife
surgery and
radiation
6/2014
EML4 ALK
CCND2
BRAF
CCNE1
CDH1
CDK4
CDK6
ERBB2
ESR1
EZH2
FBXW7
(>99.9999%)
Figure 6. Titration of cfDNA from a cancer patient with CNVs in EGFR and ERBB2 into disease-free cfDNA at 100%,
50%,25%,12.5% (absolute levels of 15%,7.5%,3.75%,1.875%). Red regions indicate less than 95% confidence. Black
and grey bars are the mean copy number for a given gene with errors bars indicating 95% confidence intervals. CNVs
are indicated by alternating black or grey bars outside the red region with errors bars that do not overlap with zero.
Crizotinib therapy was initiated on the basis of the EML4-ALK fusion with
rapid clinical improvement (Figure 3)
Repeat Guardant360 analysis revealed that the EML4-ALK fusion is no
longer detected (Figure 4)
TM
100
10
0.1
#"
25.2%
0.01
0.3%
15.0%
Figure
4. Pre- and post-Crizotinib lung images. Image A. CT scan of lungs shows persistent disease in left
Figure 4. Concordance of SNVs detected in tumor biopsy vs cfDNA. The pie chart (left) illustrates
the total number of samples in which no overlap was observed (blue), with overlap (red), and the
lower
lobe. Image B. Repeat CT Chest shows near complete resolution of Base
leftPosition
lower
(bp) lobe masses.
samples where no SNVs were detected in the tumor. The bar graph (right) shows the average
concordance seen in all samples (left column) or only in the samples that had at least one
matching SNV between tumor and cfDNA (right column).
CT Scan A
CT Scan B
A 62-year old male patient underwent primary tumor excision for melanoma and inguinal
LN dissection 4 years ago (stage III). The patient developed liver, spleen, axillary and
inguinal LN metastases 4 years later. The patient was refractory to two prior regimens and
had no further treatment options. Sequencing of the FFPE tumor block was negative for
BRAF alterations. After obtaining informed consent form, the patients blood was drawn for
cell free DNA sequencing which showed a BRAF V600E mutation. The patient was put on
a BRAF inhibitor for two months and the patient is currently in partial remission with >80%
shrinkage in tumor mass. After four months the patient continues to respond to treatment
with even greater shrinkage in tumor mass (Figure 5).
A
Baseline (0 months)
Conclusions
B
Figure 2: Detected minor allele frequencies across an entire 80kb panel in 0.1% LNCaP cfDNA
06.11.14
10.01.14
02.19.15
titration using off-the-shelf next-generation sequencing (top) and Digital SequencingTM (bottom)
workflows. Red points are true positives and black points are false positives. It is clear from the
Whole body
cancertechnologies
tracking are too noisy to
number of false positives that current next-generation
sequencing
at below
multiple
time Digital
pointsSequencing
with TM produces no
accurately detect mutations at concentration
1%, while
Guardant Health
Technology
false positives even down to below 0.01% concentrations
and enables
high-fidelity sequencing of
single molecules (>99.999% accuracy).
Conclusions
The present work shows the strong potential clinical impact of Digital
Sequencing in analysis of circulating cell-free tumor-derived nucleic acids,
thereby allowing researchers and clinicians to comprehensively and noninvasively monitor the genetic dimension of cancer throughout the body.
Related Publications
1/2015
Cri Zontinib
Therapy,
Rapid Clinical
Improvement
!"
We applied Digital Sequencing to the analysis of 320 cancer patient plasma samples to
Point Mutations
evaluate our clinical performance for the detection of SNVs in ctDNA. The results of our
58 year old female diagnosed with advanced NSCLC in July 2013 after
FGFR1
FGFR2
FGFR3
GATA3
GNA11
GNAQ
GNAS
HNF1A
Single-Molecule Library
Case
she presented with acute right hip pain. Imaging revealed a right
Preparation
HRAS
IDH1
IDH2
JAK2
JAK3
KIT
KRAS
MAP2KI
58 year-old woman, never smoker, was diagnosed with lung
proximal femur lesion, a left lower lobe lung mass, lytic
disease in
herwild type) with bone predominant metastatic
MAP2K2 MET
MLH1
MPL
MYC
NF1
NFE2L2 NOTCH1
adenocarcinoma
(KRAS
NPM1
NRAS
NTRK1
PDGFRA PIK3CA PTEN
PTPN11 RAF1
disease
February
2013. Multiple attempts to Digital
obtainSequencing
tissue for
lumbar spine, and brain metastases (Figure 1). Biopsy of
the inright
femur
additional genotyping were done but yielded insufficient tissue. She
Digital Sequencing
been evaluated
for the SMO
detection of CNVs
RET
RHEB
RHOA Technology
RIT1 has also
ROS1
SMAD4
SRC in 31 out
of 54 genes in our panel to identify clinical relevant gene amplification and deletions in
lesion was consistent with lung adenocarcinoma, KRAS
wild
type,
was treated
with carboplatin/pemetrexed
for 4 cycles with initial
STK11
TERT**
TP53
VHL (Figure 6).
cancer patient
plasma samples
Bioinformatics
response, followed by 2 cycles of maintenance Digital
pemetrexed.
She declined
insufficient tissue for additional molecular testing. She further
began
treatment
Detection of EGFR and ERBB2 CNVs in cfDNA
maintence
therapy and was observed. Subsequently, she
Amplifications
Fusions
Indels
symptomatic
progression
of
her
developed
new
brain
lesions
and
with carboplatin and pemetrexed in September 2013 osseous
and disease.
received
4
ALK
RET
AR
BRAF
CCNE1
CDK4
EGFR exon 19 deletions
She underwent gamma knife surgery and attempted
Generate Report
palliative
radiation to her spine but stopped due Cell-Free
to sideTumor
effects.
ROS1
NTRK1
CDK8
EGFR
ERBB2
FGFR1
EGFR exon 20 insertions
cycles of therapy, followed by 2 cycles of maintenance
pemetrexed.
Burden, She
Principal
Profile, ...sample
decided to undergo cell free DNA (cfDNA) testing
fromTumor
a blood
FGFR2
KRAS
MET
MYC
Maintenance therapy was stopped in February 2014to determine
due toif genomic
patient
*Complete exon coverage for genes in bold
information could be obtained on her tumor.
Figure 1
PDGFRA KIK3CA
RAF1
** Includes TERT promoter region
Figure 2. Work flow for
preference. By October 2014, she had new brain metastases
and
Patient 57 year old Female
Figure 3. Guardant360 68 gene panel
Diagnosis NSCLC
Guardant360
testing
Digital Sequencing
Case
Study
1
progressive bone disease. A repeat biopsy for molecular
assessment
4/2015Major
Genomic Driver EGFR For clinical applications of sequencing ctDNA, we developed a 54 gene panel of
Guardant360 has high
Digital sequencing
80,000 bases consisting of all exonic bases of 18 actionable cancer-related
genes
Guardant360
was recommended however she declined. She was agreeable toand coverage of the hot exons of an additional 36 onco-/tumor-suppressor
Collect 2 tubes of blood
sensitivity (detection of single
technology
uses input from
genes
(e.g., exons containing at least one or more reported somaticcell
mutations
in toResults
nucleotide variants, focal gene
free DNA
create
Guardant360 blood testing in February 2015 to evaluate for tumor cellCOSMIC or separate publications).
Sequence a patients cancer
amplifications in 16 genes,
perfect sequencing and
across
dozens
of
genes
and
EGFR indels and fusions in ALK,
Complete exon and partial intron
Exons covered with reported somaticeliminates
alterations noise created by
identify genomic alterations
free DNA (cfDNA).
EML4-ALK fusion wasstandard
detected
from a single mutant molecule
inNTRK1)
a 10
mL
ROS1, RET and
in 87%+
next generation
Capture the constantly
of advanced cancer patients)
sequencing platforms.
evolving
adaptive
response
of
7/2013
10/2014
tube of blood
and ultra-high specificity
(Figure 2)
Figure 1.
the tumor at any point in time
Initial Presentation
Progression in bones,
6/2014
0.01
Germline
4/2014
0.1
True
2/2013
False
Figure 3: Titration of LNCap cfDNA in disease-free cfDNA at five different concentrations: 30%, 10%, 1%,
0.3% and 0.1%. At levels below 0.1% in this study, many mutations are harbored by <1-2 molecules and
hence fundamental stochastic capture limits come into play.
Case
10
SNVs
Introduction
Current approaches based on invasive biopsy genetic analysis can fail to capture
an accurate picture of the real-time cancer profile due to limited spatial window of
biopsy into residual disease throughout the body. Moreover, tumor re-biopsy has
significant challenges to be widely used in practice for serial monitoring of disease
progression or acquired resistance. Analysis of circulating tumor nucleic acids
(ctDNA) by massively parallel DNA sequencing has created an exciting new tool for
capturing an accurate, more complete and real-time picture of a patients tumor
profile throughout the body and over the course of disease. However, the
widespread use of this biomarker has been limited by the high-quality false
positives and non-systematic distortion present in current NGS assays, especially
where the tumor-derived fraction is low (<1%). These limitations of therefore
impeded routine clinical use of circulating DNA in oncology.
21x17mm
14x12mm
1. Lee J, Mortimer S, Mei G, Sebisanovic D, Siew LM, Eltoukhy H, Talasaz A. Ultra-high-quality sequencing assay for
comprehensive genetic panel analysis of tumor-derived circulating cell-free DNA in colorectal cancer patients, J Clin Oncol 32,
2014 (suppl 3; abstract 504)
2. Talasaz A, Sebisanovic D, Mei G, Siew LM, Eltoukhy H. Non-Invasive Solid Tumor Sequencing:True-high quality sequencing
assay for comprehensive panel anaylsis of rare tumor-derived circulating cell-free DNA, 2013 Annual Meeting of The American
Society of Human Genetics, Boston.
10x10mm
3. Mei G, Sebisanovic D, Mir A, Gulzar Z, Brooks J, Jeffrey S, Talasaz A. "Liquid biopsy-based assays to monitor residual disease
in cancer," J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstract 11096)
4. Schwarz AK, Stanulla M, Cario G, Flohr T, Sutton R, Mricke A, Anker P, Stroun M, Welte K, Bartram CR, Schrappe M,
Schrauder A., "Quantification of free total plasma DNA and minimal residual disease detection in the plasma of children with acute
lymphoblastic leukemia," Ann Hematol. 2009 Sep;88(9):897-905. doi: 10.1007/s00277-009-0698-6
To our knowledge, this is the first case report of EML4-ALK fusion identified
free
circulating
tumor
DNA
analysis
5. Anker P,from
Mulcahy H,biopsyStroun M., "Circulating
nucleic
acids in plasma and serum
as a noninvasive
investigation
for cancer: time
for large-scale clinical studies?," Int J Cancer. 2003 Jan 10;103(2):149-52..
27x16mm
19x8mm
Cancer Metastasis Rev.
1999;18(1):65-73.
With single molecule
sensitivity, this
blood test was 14x8mm
able to identify a therapeutic
option
in a patient who was unable to undergo tissueFigure
5.
Tumor
Response
Map
EML4-ALK clone disappears
fromS, Lyautey
circulation
onE, Stroun
crizotinib
therapy.
7. Chen X, Bonnefoi H, Diebold-Berger
J, Lederrey C, Faltin-Traub
M, Anker P, "Detecting
tumor-related
Figure
5. Patient
AP (top)
andbone
chest (bottom)
CT scans at 0, 2, and
4 months after treatment with a BRAF
NGS
and
had
predominant
disease
based
alterations in plasma or serum DNA of patients diagnosed with breast cancer," Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Sep;5(9):2297-303.
6. Anker P, Mulcahy H, Chen XQ, Stroun M., "Detection of circulating tumour DNA in the blood (plasma/serum) of cancer patients,"
inhibitor for (a) right hip subcutaneous lesion and (b) left axillary metastatic LN. Sites of metastases are
indicated with a yellow arrow and tumor dimensions are indicated under each scan.
8. Mulcahy HE, Lyautey J, Lederrey C, qi Chen X, Anker P, Alstead EM, Ballinger A, Farthing MJ, Stroun M., "A prospective study
of K-ras mutations in the plasma of pancreatic cancer patients," Clin Cancer Res. 1998 Feb;4(2):271-5.
Conclusion
9. Chen XQ, Stroun M, Magnenat JL, Nicod LP, Kurt AM, Lyautey J, Lederrey C, Anker P. "Microsatellite alterations in plasma DNA
of small cell lung cancer patients," Nat Med. 1996 Sep;2(9):1033-5.
To our knowledge, this is the first clinical case report of EML4-ALK fusion identified
from biopsy-free circulating tumor DNA analysis
Based on detection of two molecules harboring an EML4-ALK fusion, cell-free DNA
NGS enabled a successful therapeutic intervention in a patient who was unable to
undergo tissue-based NGS