Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 | Page
Abstract
I chose to research the topic of construction safety and the issue of the
strict laws that is being enforced on many construction jobs and companies
in the US. I chose this topic because I have first-hand experience in the
construction field as an electrician. I have been to both residential and
commercial jobs including both large and small companies. I have seen
plenty of examples of how the laws affect the jobs both positively and
negatively.
2 | Page
3 | Page
Another example I have is the newer ladder safety rules. Any ladder 6
or taller requires you to tie it don along with yourself on a harness. If you are
unfamiliar with ladders, picture a basic 6 foot step ladder tied down to a
ceiling along with you on a harness, seem like overkill? I do believe it is. You
could say its to protect your well being on the ladder to prevent physical
harm. But the construction worker who has climbed ladders for 20 years can
say it is unnecessary and that it is only for OSHA to collect fines for failure to
comply. If workers have been climbing on ladders for over 100 years, what
has changed now? Are they more dangerous? I dont think so, but there had
to have been a reason why.
OSHA could argue back and say that the fines are there to scare you
from breaking the rule. Or in other words make consequences for your
actions. But is profiting off of someones mistake that could have resulted in
injury moral? If you look at the numbers of injuries before and after the
ladder restrictions were put in place, you will find that they have not changed
much at all. So it makes you wonder why they changed it in the first place.
4 | Page
company, and under law he is responsible for all the actions of his
employees. Obviously he cant control the employees while hes not there.
But he is responsible for supplying every piece of safety equipment required
by OSHA. There is a huge range of things you will have to supply such as
glasses, hard hats, harnesses, etc. so it financially hurts the bosses. Now, it
is starting to sound like all OSHA wants to do is make employers spend
money. However from OSHAs point of view, they could say that you cant
put a price on human life. Is someones eye sight not worth a $10 pair of
safety glasses?
Ethically speaking, OSHAs laws are for The good of many meaning,
That excellence stems from a concern for the achievement of the common
good (as opposed to what is good just for the individual person or company)
so they cant have tailor made laws to include or exclude companies to help
them with expensive safety gear. Would it be fair to the big companies if the
small companies got a break on laws and didnt have to buy all the gear?
Then youd ask if the small companies are not as important as the big ones if
they dont have to follow as many safety precautions.
5 | Page
that could potentially lead to injuries on the job. To me, it is a clear violation
of privacy to show up without any type of warrant and go through the
businesses things like that.
The utilitarian view of this is that they are trying to assure themselves
that the company is operating safely to ensure the greater good of its
employees. With that being said, there is again a fine if something is found
during that audit. To me it is immoral to show up unannounced and fine
someone after snooping around their things. Because the owner may not
intentionally be missing things or have damaged safety gear. There are
several cases where employees lose things like hard hats and not tell the
boss. If the boss is unaware of things like
is it really his fault? In that case, should OSHA just go around and fine
everyone to make a big pay day?
The rules make you think why theyre there, and who they were
designed to protect. Are they there to protect the average construction
worker? Or rather to protect the governments bank account? I say this
because of the harsh fines employees and employers can receive when
found guilty of breaking the rules. In the event an employee is hurt on the
6 | Page
job and they are legitimately temporarily disabled, they can file for workers
compensation. When someone is on workers compensation, they collect
government money. And I believe that the safety laws are there to prevent
people from going out on workers comp. In other words, if an employee gets
hurt under a safety violation, they are completely responsible for their own
actions. While OSHASs rules can be assumed to be for the greater good,
who are they bringing justice to? While they see to have good intentions, it
effects companies big and small in negative ways. No one wants to get hurt
on the job. OSHA should be offering guidance, not fines.
save money on buying safety equipment. Fining a small company could put
them out of business which in turn, hurts the economy. The more companies
that go out of business have employees who could go out on unemployment,
and that unemployment money comes from government funds. So when
OSHA fines these people to gain money, they are potentially losing money
7 | Page
from unemployed workers. When looking deep into the issue, OSHAs master
plan basically snowballs and the outcome actually hurts them in the end.
Works Cited
1)
Thomas Krause, Ph.D. The Ethics of Safety, How a safety program can be the
starting point for building an ethical organization Jun 1, 2007
http://ehstoday.com/safety/best-practices/ehs_imp_67392
2)
Epstine Becker & Green, P.C, Willful OSHA Violations Require More than
Mere Negligence, Says the DC Circuit 10/8/2012
8 | Page
http://www.oshalawupdate.com/2012/10/08/willful-osha-violations-require-morethan-mere-negligence-says-the-dc-circuit/