Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tasha Smith
Northern Illinois University
Journal Article Review:
Traditional Versus Non-Traditional University Students: Does Age Determine Learning?
universities recruit their students was also very interesting as well, the article mentioned that
institutions are becoming more aware of their student population and are trying to make
adjustments for them. Those adjustments include offering night classes, Saturday classes, as well
as counselors that are better accustomed to dealing with students who are not on the traditional
route.
The recommendation lists really stood out to me as well. Anything that I would have to
say that needs to be improved was mentioned in the recommendation list. The author mentioned
two different lists with different recommendations that would answer any questions to the
limitations of her study. The list included recommendations for the research that included;
researching a larger sample size, the fact that it is mentioned that consideration for the different
educational background of the students that attend the institutions, the recommendation list also
mentioned that further research is needed from different universities as well as in different
subjects to get a better understanding of the difference between the two groups of students. The
other recommendation list was for the professional in this field. The lists of recommendations
include the fact that each professional should treat all students equally regardless of their age or
anything else. Also the professionals must provide multiple activities in the class that can meet
the needs of all the students, as well as participate in workshops to learn about different
techniques that will better assist them with dealing with the diversity of age within their
classrooms. These lists of recommendations are great examples on further research and further
education that will make the classroom experience a better one for all students.
After reading this article I thought that there were several issues that I had with this piece
of literature. However, after getting to the recommendations list, I learned that all of the things
that I had an issue with was indeed recommended for further research. I think that the fact that
the author understood that this was a limited study and would need more information and
statistics to get a better outlook on the information that she set out to gather.
Summary
As a non-traditional student who started at Northern Illinois University as a traditional
student this piece of literature that really spoke volumes to me as not only a student, but as a
person who has valued interest in the field of Adult and Higher Education. The information that
was presented in the literature review gave me a greater insight on how to deal with both types of
students. The fact that this study was even conducted shows that someone else believes that there
could be a difference in the manner that traditional and non-traditional learn and retain
information that is presented to them while in the classroom setting. This research will lead and
assist with further research into the topic to make the college experience as best as possible for
each and every student that attends any institution no matter what their status is as a traditional or
non-traditional student.
References
Christian, M.E. (2000). Traditional Versus Non-Traditional University Students: Does Age
Determine Learning? U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved Feb. 2015 from:
http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED442419
I hereby confirm the assignment of first publication rights only in and to the manuscript named
above in all forms and media to AAACE effective if and when it is accepted for publication by
the AEQ editorial board. I warrant that my manuscript is original work and has not been accepted
for publication by another periodical. I further warrant that my work (including tables, figures,
photographs, and other illustrative material) does not infringe on the copyright or statutory rights
of others, does not contain libelous statements, and that the editorial board members, staff, and
officers of AAACE are indemnified against costs, expenses, and damages arising from any
breach of the foregoing in regard to the manuscript. Finally, I acknowledge that AEQ is relying
on this statement in any publishing of this manuscripts information.
Manuscripts submitted to AEQ should not be under consideration for publication by any other
journals, nor should they have been published previously in any form. A paper may, however,
have been presented at a meeting or conference. In such cases, the author should state where and
when such a paper was presented. After acceptance, a paper may not be published elsewhere
without written permission from AAACE.
Letter of Transmittal:
Attach a letter addressed to the editors indicating the title of the manuscript, date of submission,
and all authors with their institutional affiliations.
Submission Process:
When manuscript is ready for submission, upload one copy to SAGETRACK at the website
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/aeq
Editorial Procedure
AEQ editorial staff initially reviews all manuscript submissions for compliance with AEQ
editorial policy. If the manuscript fails to fall within the scope and stylistic guidelines of the
journal, it is returned to the authors. If a manuscript is in accord with the scope of the journal and
meets submission guidelines, all references to the author name and institution are removed from
the manuscript, and it is submitted for blind reviews to three AEQ consulting editors. Each
consulting editor is a professional scholar judged competent to appraise such manuscripts. In
compliance with advice of consulting editors, the editors make one of four decisions: accept;
conditional accept, contingent upon major revisions; revise and resubmit; or reject. In the case of
conditional acceptance, the editors will specify necessary revisions in writing to the author.
When revisions are completed and the editors accept a manuscript, the editors will then notify
and inform the author(s) about the next steps in the publication process.
Review Criteria
In seeking to advance the understanding and practice of adult and continuing education, the
journal strives to be inclusive in scope and aims to stimulate a problem-oriented, critical
Book Reviews
The book review editor(s) solicit, edit, and manage the book review process. Suggestions for
books to be reviewed or nominations to review books should be submitted to:
Lisa Merriweather
Assistant Professor of Adult Education
University of North Carolina Charlotte
Dept. of Educational Leadership
9201 University City Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28223
704-687-3492
lmerriwe@uncc.edu