2015 Forest Health Highlights MDNR

2015
Forest Health
Highlights
Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Acknowledgments
Forest Health Highlights is a summary of the condition of Michigans forests during
2015 and the work done to preserve and protect them by Forest Resources Division,
Department of Natural Resources, www.michigan.gov/foresthealth.
Written by
Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division
Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development
Michigan State University Department of Forestry and the Department of Entomology
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service
Photographs and design by
Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service
Michigan Department of Agriculture & Rural Development
Michigan State University
Maps and other information provided by
Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service and
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Michigan State University Extension
Cover photo: The redheaded pine sawfly, Neodiprion lecontei, is native to Michigan and much of eastern North America. The larvae feed in
colonies and consume both new and old foliage. During outbreaks, multiple colonies can attack young trees and cause complete defoliation and
tree mortality. The preferred hosts in Michigan are jack pine and red pine. Young plantations less than 15 feet in height are at greatest risk.
Photo by Michigan Department of Natural Resources forest health technician Scott Lint.
Table of Contents
Forest Resource Overview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Feature: Hemlock Woolly Adelgid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Balsam Woolly Adelgid. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Aerial Survey Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Insects & Diseases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Spruce Budworm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Redheaded Pine Sawfly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
White Pine Decline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Heterobasidion Root Disease. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Oak Wilt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Beech Bark Disease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Asian Longhorned Beetle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Jack Pine Budworm. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Eastern Larch Bark Beetle. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Lecanium Scale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Weather Impact. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Forest Health Cooperators. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Michigan Department of Agriculture & Rural Development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Michigan State University. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Cooperative Invasive Species Management Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is committed to the conservation,

protection, management, use and enjoyment of the states natural and cultural resources
for current and future generations.
For more information, visit www.michigan.gov/dnr.
Forest Resource Overview

In addition to its 3,200 miles of shoreline and 5.5 million acres of
wetlands, Michigan has more forest land than any other state in the
Northeast or Midwest. Among the 50 states, Michigan ranks 22nd in
land area and 10th in forest land area. Forest land accounts for 19.3
million acres or 53 percent of land in Michigan.
Of these 19.3 million acres:
57 percent (11 million acres) is owned by families and
private individuals.
8 percent (1.5 million acres) is in industrial private ownership.
14 percent (2.7 million acres) is in federal ownership.
21 percent (4.1 million acres) is owned by the state.
A recent Michigan State University study values Michigans forest
products industry at about $17.8 billion annually. A goal of the
Michigan DNR is to increase the economic impact of the timber
industry to $20 billion.
Forest recreation and tourism is also an important part of the
states economy. Michigans state park system, established in 1919,
includes over 100 parks and recreation areas covering 285,000 acres.
These facilities host over 21 million visitors a year.
The Michigan DNR also manages nearly 140 state forest
campgrounds, including a dozen equestrian campgrounds.
Michigan state game areas encompass more than 340,000 acres.
The rich diversity of Michigans urban and rural forests is being
threatened by exotic insects, plants and diseases finding their way
into the state from around the world.
Invasive organisms like emerald ash borer, beech bark disease and
oak wilt are affecting thousands of acres in Michigan and killing
millions of trees. Without a plan of action, entire species of native
trees are at risk of disappearing from our forests.
4 - 2015 Forest Health Highlights
The solution to this crisis lies largely in public awareness.

Understanding the role humans play in the accidental introduction
of exotic pests into our forests is a vital first step in halting the
problem.
The 2015 Michigan Forest Health Highlights publication is
dedicated to getting the word out to foresters, landowners,
arborists, homeowners and community leaders about the work the
Michigan Department of Natural Resources and our partners are
doing to protect our states exceptional natural resources.
Michigans Eastern Hemlock:

A Remarkable Tree with a New Problem
Hemlock Woolly Adelgid
Michigan has been fighting the arrival of the hemlock woolly
adelgid (HWA), Adelges tsugae, for many years. HWA is an exotic
insect native to Asia. HWA is currently devastating eastern hemlock
stands in 11 northeastern states from Maine to Georgia. These
hemlock forests are suffering damaging, often permanent, affects
from this insect, including loss of diversity and significant decline
in health and vigor. No infested hemlock tree or hemlock forest has
exhibited any sign of recovery. Trees of all sizes are affected.
HWA has been detected in Michigan several times in the past
decade (see map). These introductions were caused by infested
hemlock nursery stock originating from HWA-infested areas of
the U.S. In 2001, Michigans Department of Agriculture & Rural
Development (MDARD) enacted an HWA quarantine to stop this
movement from infested areas.
Each time HWA has been detected, cooperative efforts between
MDARD, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources,
Michigan State University and the U.S. Forest Service have
stopped this threat to Michigans hemlock resource. In 2015,
a more substantial HWA detection in Muskegon and Ottawa
counties brought many state, federal and university resources
together to address the most substantial HWA introduction to
date. Additional resources needed to fully implement a draft
strategy to again remove HWA from Michigan are being sought.
Based on the most recent inventories of Michigan forests, more
2015 Forest Health Highlights - 5
Hemlock Woolly Adelgid continued

than 12 percent of the total area of timberland contains eastern
hemlock. Hemlock grows on 2.3 million forested acres.
The Tree
Eastern hemlock is an essential component of Michigans forest
biodiversity. It is a universally accepted symbol of Michigans old
growth forests. Many species of wildlife benefit from the excellent
habitat that a dense stand of hemlock provides. Streams draining
hemlock forests support more aquatic invertebrate species than
streams draining hardwood forests. Brook trout are more common in
streams with hemlock in the surrounding forest.
Many of our state and national parks, state forest campgrounds and
forested trail systems feature majestic hemlock trees. Their stature,
beauty, and the sense of ecological and historical significance they
provide visitors are an important part of the states recreational
experience. Eastern hemlock is often planted as an ornamental option
because of its relative freedom from insects and disease, good form,
pleasant foliage color, and adaptability to shearing.
Eastern hemlock is a slow-growing, long-lived tree that, unlike many
trees, grows well in shade. In fact, eastern hemlock is the most shade
tolerant of all tree species. It can survive with as little as 5 percent of
full sunlight. Hemlock can take 250 to 300 years to reach maturity
and may live for 800 years or more.
Wildlife Resource
Wildlife values alone are a strong justification for maintaining hemlock
as a component in the northern forest. The value of hemlock stands
as winter cover for deer is widely recognized. The dense, closedcanopy of a pure hemlock stand reduces both wind velocity and snow
depth. Other animals commonly associated with hemlock-dominated

ecosystems are ruffed grouse, moose, turkey, snowshoe hare,
porcupine, yellow-bellied sapsucker, red squirrel and red-backed vole.
Thirty-seven mammalian and 20 herptile species are associated with
hemlock forests in the Lake Superior region.
Hemlock-mixed forests are likely an important element in
conservation efforts in the Lake States for declining North American
songbirds. Elimination of hemlock in northern forest would lead to
reductions in the abundance of several bird species, notably blackthroated green warbler, Blackburnian warbler, solitary vireo and
northern parula.
The Hemlock Woolly Adelgid
HWA was first described in
western North America in 1924
and first reported in the eastern
United States in 1951 near
Richmond, Virginia. In their native
range in Asia, populations of
HWA cause little damage to local
species of hemlock. However, in
the absence of natural controls
in eastern North America, and a lack of HWA resistance in eastern
and Carolina Hemlock, HWA damage and kill infested trees within
a few years. HWA is now established from northeastern Georgia
to southeastern Maine and as far west as eastern Kentucky and
Tennessee (see map of HWA distribution in eastern U.S. on next page).
HWA damages hemlocks by sucking sap from young twigs. It is a
small, aphid-like insect that uses its long, siphoning mouthparts
to extract sap from hemlock trees. This feeding causes needles to

Preventing HWA
Michigans greatest risk of HWA introductions is through the transport of
infested nursery stock and landscape trees. Because of this threat, MDARD
enforces a quarantine on hemlock originating from outside the state of
Michigan. In 2001, Michigans Department of Agriculture quarantined the
importation of eastern hemlock logs, untreated bark products, seedlings
and nursery stock in an effort to limit the threat of HWA.
In support of the Michigan HWA quarantine, DNR Forest Health
personnel continue to survey for HWA in areas at risk of introduction and
in areas of past introductions. Activities at these sites are supported in
part by a Forest Health Protection grant from the U.S. Forest Service.
discolor and drop prematurely. The loss of new shoots and

needles seriously impairs tree health. Defoliation and tree
death can occur within several years.
If established in an area, HWA can easily move to other areas
on wildlife, the wind and peoples clothing and other gear.
Detecting introductions quickly and removing them is critical
to keeping HWA from establishing in Michigan.
For more information on the biology and North American
distribution of HWA see the U.S. Forest Service Forest Health
Protection website dedicated to the hemlock woolly adelgid:
http://na.fs.fed.us/fhp/hwa/.
Hemlock trees killed by hemlock woolly adelgid.


Managing HWA Introductions
HWA infestations can be very difficult to detect at
low population levels. The insect is small and may
initially only infest a few branches high in the tree.
Because of this, MDARD monitors treated sites for
several years to ensure there is not a resurgence of
HWA in those areas.
Michigans HWA quarantine has been in place since
2001. The law restricts the movement of hemlock
into the state, and includes a complete ban on
the movement of hemlock from infested areas as
part of a statewide quarantine. Quarantine details
are available by visiting MDARDs Plant, Pest &
Pesticide Info page: http://michigan.gov/mda
rd/0,4610,7-125-2390_46323---,00.html.
If an HWA infestation is suspected, do not remove
potentially infested materials from the site. Take
photos, note the locations of the affected tree(s) and
report the problem to one of the following:
1-800-292-3939
MDA-Info@michigan.gov
www.misin.msu.edu
Management of HWA in Michigan is a cooperative
effort between MDARD, the Michigan DNR and the
U.S. Forest Service.
Hemlock Woolly Adelgid Infestation History in Michigan

(Year Detected)
Muskegon Co.
(2015)
Emmet Co.
(2006, 2007,
2010)
Ottawa Co.
(2010)
Ottawa Co.
(2010, 2015)
Macomb Co.
(2010)
Allegan Co.
(2013)
Berrien Co.
(2012)
Macomb Co.
(2010)
Balsam Woolly Adelgid

The Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development
(MDARD) enforces a quarantine to protect the states balsam
fir from the balsam woolly adelgid (BWA). According to the U.S.
Forest Service, BWA was accidently introduced into Maine in 1908
from Europe. It now infests firs in southern Canada, the Pacific
Northwest and the northeastern United States. In the eastern
United States, vast stands of Fraser and balsam fir have been killed,
with serious impacts on timber and Christmas tree industries. In
the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, 95 percent of Fraser fir
has been killed by BWA.
Top: Twig gouting

caused by the
balsam woolly
adelgid (BWA).
Bottom left: BWA,
small cotton-like
balls on balsam
fir twigs. Bottom
right: White cottony
BWA on the trunk of
a balsam fir.
Balsam woolly adelgid is a sap-feeding insect that attacks true firs,

including balsam fir and Fraser fir. The BWA causes twig gouting (see
image), kills branches, and eventually kills the tree. Small (less than
1/32nd of an inch) purplish-black adult BWA form white, waxy wool
that covers twigs, branches and stems of infested trees. Smaller,
amber-colored crawlers hatch in mid-summer, which is when the risk
of spreading the insect by wind and wildlife is highest. BWA affects firs
in forests, seed production, landscaping and Christmas tree farms.
While we dont have BWA in Michigan, it could be introduced into
the states landscape in a number of ways, including on infested
nursery stock, firewood, logs and vehicles and then spread by wind,
birds and other animals which can carry it for miles, said MDARD
Director Jamie Clover Adams. And, once its here, its difficult to
detect and eradicate.
The BWA quarantine generally prohibits the shipment of fir nursery
stock and fir timber products into Michigan from infested states.
Certain low-risk fir products are exempt, including Christmas trees
and wreaths and heat-treated timber products. The quarantine
also allows fir seedlings grown under an active pest management
program to be shipped into Michigan.

The U.S. Forest Services Forest Inventory and Analysis Program
reports Michigans balsam fir resource is comprised of 1.9 billion
trees. This equates to a volume of 903 million board feet of
sawtimber, or 463 million cubic feet of trees. Balsam fir is an
important source of pulp and dimensional lumber.
For more info on BWA, visit: www.na.fs.fed.us/pubs/fidls/bwa.pdf.
Aerial Survey & Digital Mobile Sketch Mapping

The Michigan Department of Natural Resources, in cooperation with
the U.S. Forest Service, conducts annual aerial detection surveys
(ADS) for insect and disease damage over most of Michigans
nearly 20 million acres of forested land. These annual surveys occur
throughout the growing season. Surveys are intensified in July when
most significant defoliation events are at a peak.
Large areas of defoliation caused by agents such as spruce
budworm, jack pine budworm, aspen tortix, forest tent caterpillar
and gypsy moth are mapped during aerial survey missions.
Aerial survey data is
used to monitor damage
and changes in pest
populations from year
to year, and serve as
an early detection tool
for newly emerging
problems. Michigans
aerial survey data are
rolled up with other
states data into a
national summary and
Digital Mobile Sketch Mapping screen capture.
are being used to inform
tactical decisions by local forest managers on the ground.
many new and improved features over the Digital Aerial Sketch
Mapping (DASM) system currently being used around the country.
Beta testing has proceeded well enough that the Michigan Forest
Health Program used the new system operationally across the state
in 2015. This effort represents the largest set of data collected using
DMSM to date.
The DNR Forest Health Program aerial surveyors have been

participating in the testing of a new data capturing and recording
system being developed and deployed by the Forest Service, Forest
Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET).
DMSM offers new efficiencies and capabilities the old system was
lacking. The new system uses an Android operating system and
is currently being used on several different-sized tablets. This
makes it extremely flexible not only for aerial mapping but also for
ground checking.
The new Digital Mobile Sketch Mapping (DMSM) system introduces
Data collected with the DMSM are synchronized via wireless
Aerial Survey continued

connection to a server at FHTET in Ft. Collins, Colorado. This gives all
surveyors immediate access to recently collected forest health data.
Using this feature, aerial surveyors can provide forest health staff, and
other forestry professionals, near real-time access to this information.
EAB Damage Mapped

Using DMSM Grid System
This capability provides field staff an efficient method of giving

aerial surveyors rapid and accurate feedback about what theyre
seeing on the ground. The ground-checking process in DMSM allows
for edits or comments to be made to the data. This provides timely
feedback and a new level of quality control for aerial survey data.
In addition to the traditional mapping using freehand polygons and
points digitized on the tablet, the DMSM also introduces a grid cell
mapping feature.
Recent severe and widespread insect and disease events, including
emerald ash borer and beech bark disease, have been difficult to
map accurately because they affect a discontinuous component of
large forested areas.
DMSM introduces the option of projecting a series of grid cells
across the imagery on the screen. Depending on the scope and
intensity of the damage, aerial surveyors can select the appropriate
scale grid cell to quickly highlight the affected area.
Information about insect and disease outbreaks within the selected
grid cells, including intensity and distribution, is quickly summarized
using predefined categories. Multiple grid cells can be selected and
summarized at the same time.
Legend
Rivers and Lakes
Grid cell with EAB mortality
Digital Mobile Sketch Mapping grid cell mapping emerald ash borer damage.
summer. Note the use of smaller grid cells along riparian areas
where the mortality and the host trees are concentrated, compared
to the larger grid cells used to capture more diffuse damage in other
parts of the landscape.
With this seasons successful pilot-testing of the DMSM, the DNR
anticipates full rollout of this system in Michigan for the 2016 season.
The grid cell system was used successfully to collect emerald ash
borer mortality for the first time in Iosco and Arenac counties this
Insects & Diseases

Healthy and productive forests are comprised of a diversity of native
tree, shrub and herbaceous plant species, as well as an even larger
number of faunal species for which forests provide habitat. Forested
ecosystems have continuously adapted and evolved over thousands of
years, as insect, plant and animal species are naturally, intentionally
or inadvertently introduced or extirpated from ecosystems. Prevention
and mitigation of invasive plants, insects and disease introductions are
important for the maintenance of healthy and productive forests.
From Michigan Forest Resource Assessment & Strategy
June 2010
Spruce Budworm
It appears that Michigan has entered the beginning years of the next
regional spruce budworm (SBW; Choristoneura fumiferana) outbreak.
The entire western Upper Peninsula, areas in the eastern Upper
Peninsula and areas in the northeastern Lower Peninsula were
defoliated by SBW for the second consecutive year.
Epidemics of spruce budworm periodically cause extensive
defoliation and tree mortality in spruce and fir forests across the
northeastern United
States and Canada.
Historically, epidemics
have occurred on a 30to 50-year cycle. The
last epidemic ended in
Michigan in 1982.
Budworm populations
have been building
in isolated areas of
susceptible forests in
the Upper Peninsula
Spruce budworm damage on new growth.
for the past decade.
Susceptible forests are
those where balsam fir and spruce are stressed and abundant, and
where balsam fir average age is greater than 50 years.
Recently, populations have been rising to high levels one year, only
to collapse the next.
Beginning in 2014, however, areas of heavy defoliation
remained heavy in 2015. In addition, defoliation was much more
widespread across the western Upper Peninsula this year. Once
Trees damaged by spruce budworm.
SBW populations become widespread, all spruce and fir trees are
subject to some level of defoliation.
The Insect
The SBW is one of the most destructive native insects in the
northern spruce and fir forests of the eastern United States and
Canada. Periodic outbreaks of the spruce budworm are part of the
natural cycle of events associated with the maturing of balsam fir.
White and black spruce are also hosts, with limited feeding occurring
on tamarack, pine and hemlock.
Since 1909, there have been waves of budworm outbreaks
throughout the eastern United States and Canada. The states most
often affected are Maine, New Hampshire, New York, Michigan,
Minnesota and Wisconsin. SBW outbreaks last for 10 to 15 years and
Spruce Budworm continued

Upper Peninsula. Balsam fir provides food and/or cover for animals.
Moose rely on balsam fir in winter when it is a major source of food.
The use of balsam fir by deer for cover and shelter is well documented.
During severe winter weather, especially in northern areas of the
white-tailed deer range, lowland balsam fir stands and spruce-balsam
fir swamps are used extensively as winter yarding areas.
Balsam fir provide a small part of the diet for both the spruce grouse
and the ruffed grouse. Buds, tips, and needles are consumed, and
more feeding occurs in winter than in summer. Thickets of balsam fir
provide shelter for both birds.
Spruce budworm larva.
have resulted in the loss of millions of cords of spruce and fir.

The SBW limits the longevity of balsam fir-dominated and mixed
spruce/fir forests in northeastern North America.
Large scale SBW outbreaks cause widespread top kill and tree mortality.
Mature and over-mature balsam fir dominated stands are most severely
damaged. Susceptible stands often lose 60 to 80 percent of the fir and
20 to 40 percent of the spruce. Mature fir stands may be entirely lost.
The last outbreak in Michigan started in the Upper Peninsula in
the late 1960s and ended in the early 1980s. Over 519,000 acres of
spruce and fir trees died in Michigan as a result.
The Resource
The vast majority of Michigans spruce and fir forests are in the
White spruce stands are a source of cover and food for some species
of game. Moose and hares frequent these forests but seldom eat
white spruce, while red squirrels and spruce grouse live in these
forests and also feed on parts of the tree. Prey species (furbearers)
such as marten, wolverine, lynx, wolves and others also reside in
these forests.
The most important products made from balsam fir wood are
pulpwood and lumber. The major use of balsam fir lumber is for
light-frame construction. Minor uses include paneling, crates, and
other products not requiring high structural strength.
White spruce is a source of wood fiber and lumber products as well.
Lesser-known uses of white spruce wood are for house logs, musical
instruments, paddles, and various boxes and containers.
U.S. Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis estimates that
Michigan has 174 million balsam fir trees with a volume of 919
million board feet, and 69 million white spruce trees with a volume
of 2,333 million board feet.
Spruce Budworm continued

Management
Current management guidance is to harvest spruce and fir when
they reach rotation age of 50 years, or salvage harvestable stands
with significant SBW damage. The best long-term SBW strategy is to
schedule harvests over time with the goal of creating widespread
distribution of stands with different spruce-fir age classes.
SBW is the primary limiting factor affecting mature and over-mature
spruce and fir. Increasing the diversity of age classes and keeping
stand age near 50 years will reduce total tree mortality and growth
loss. This will also decrease the number of highly vulnerable stands
when SBW outbreaks occur. In turn, this increases the amount of
thermal cover available for wildlife.
The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is evaluating at-risk
forests on state land. The goal is to harvest high value, accessible
spruce and fir trees before they are lost to the SBW. About 20 percent
of Michigans spruce and fir trees grow on state forest land, with
24 percent on federal lands and 56 percent on private/industrial
ownership. Opportunities to harvest spruce and fir from these lands
are often limited due to poor access and to restrictions that limit
harvesting activity on sensitive sites like protected river corridors.
For answers to commonly asked SBW questions, including how to
protect landscape spruce and fir, visit
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/dnr/SBW_FAQ_-_
FINAL_492925_7.pdf?20151215134857.
Redheaded Pine Sawfly

The redheaded pine sawfly, Neodiprion lecontei, damaged young
plantation red and jack pine in areas of the Northern Lower
Peninsula for the second year. A site in Montmorency County is
estimated to have 100 acres heavily defoliated by the sawfly, with
several hundred acres affected to a lesser degree.
Reports of sawfly activity were numerous from the Huron National
Forest to the Tawas City area. The eastern Upper Peninsula also
reported sawfly populations in 2015.
Sawfly outbreaks tend to build regionally. If these populations
continue to build in 2016, young red and jack plantations should
be monitored in late June and early July while larvae are small. The
sawfly is easily controlled with pesticides.
Top: Redheaded pine

sawfly larvae. Bottom
left: Damage caused
by the redheaded pine
sawfly. Bottom right:
Sawfly laying eggs in
needles in June.
The Insect
The red-headed pine sawfly is an important defoliator of young twoneedle pines. Plantations less than 15 feet tall are most susceptible
to economic injury.
Heaviest infestations occur commonly on pines growing under
stress, particularly those at the edges of hardwood forests, on poor
soils, or where there is heavy competitive vegetation.
The sawfly prefers edge trees. Repeated defoliation can cause
top kill, forking and tree mortality. A single moderate to heavy
defoliation stunts height growth of infested trees. Complete
defoliation is usually sufficient to kill red pine and jack pine.
The larvae feed in colonies containing a few to over a hundred
larvae. Early damage is similar to that of most other coniferousfeeding sawflies. It is characterized by the reddish-brown, straw-like
remains of needles partially consumed by the young larvae. Older

larvae devour the entire needle, generally stripping a branch of all its
foliage before feeding on another.
Early detection and rapid response are the keys to protecting
infested sites. Monitoring egg laying and early larval development in
June and early July is critical to successfully controlling populations.
White Pine Decline

There have been interesting new developments in the search to identify
the cause of white pine dieback and mortality in the northcentral Lower
Peninsula. Researchers in the southeastern U.S. have been investigating
a similar problem affecting white pine there. Recently, a scale insect,
Matsucoccus macrocicatrices, has been implicated in dieback and
mortality of young white pine trees in several states, including Georgia,
North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia.
Scales are sucking insects that insert tiny, straw-like mouthparts
into bark, fruit, or leaves of trees, shrubs and other perennial plants.
While some species of scales cause no apparent harm, others can
seriously damage host plants.
In summer 2015, the Matsucoccus scale was confirmed on samples
of white pine collected in Michigans northern Lower Peninsula.
Samples came from state forest land in eastern Crawford County.
This is one of several areas weve been monitoring since damage
was first reported in 2008 by Michigan Department of Natural
Resources foresters in the Grayling Forest Management Unit.
The dieback and mortality occur on understory white pine seedlings
and saplings along or near the Au Sable and Manistee river corridors.
Often, affected white pines are growing below an oak overstory.
Damage is associated with small cankers that occur on branches of
affected white pine. Often, these cankers are below, or in proximity
to, the fronds of lichen widely distributed in these forests.
Lichens are organisms made up of algae and fungi living together
in a mutually beneficial relationship. Harmless to their host, they
frequently grow on the bark of a variety of forest tree species.
In Michigan Department of Natural Resources surveys, Matsucoccus
Scale insect
identified by arrows.
scale is most often associated with a particular species of lichen,

Melanelixia subaurifera, commonly found on branches and small
twigs of white pine trees in northern Michigan.
Interestingly, Matsucoccus scales has been known for some time
in forests in the Canadian Atlantic Maritimes, as well as in New
Hampshire and Massachusetts, but have not been found to cause
significant damage there.
Prior to the identification of this scale on white pine in Michigan, pine
spittlebug, Aphrophora parallella, was being investigated as a possible
culprit. Pine spittlebug is a native pest of Lake State conifers. Feeding
by spittlebug nymphs and adults during periodic outbreaks can cause
branch dieback and needle discoloration. Recent findings by the
southern researchers suggest that feeding scars previously attributed to
pine spittlebugs may, in fact, be caused by Matsucoccus scales.
It appears the scale has a two-year life cycle in Michigan, with quite a
bit of overlap in the life stages.
There is evidence a fungus, Therrya pini, may also be a factor in the
dieback and mortality. Feed damage by the scale may be creating
opportunities for the fungus to invade the tree.
Heterobasidion Root Disease

The Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Health program,
in cooperation with Michigan Technological University, has intensified
detection efforts for the fungal pathogen Heterobasidion irregulare. Field
surveys to identify Heterobasidion root disease (HRD), as well as spore
trapping surveys to determine the potential presence of the fungus,
were conducted in both the Upper and Lower peninsulas this fall. These
surveys resulted in a number of new detections.
This project is a collaborative effort with forest health partners in
Wisconsin and Minnesota. It is being funded by a U.S. Forest Service
Forest Health Monitoring, Evaluation Monitoring grant.
Trees infected by HRD suffer from thinned crowns, reduced height
and trunk diameter, as well as slower shoot growth. Over time,
circular pockets of dead and dying trees within a forest mark the
progression of the disease.
Heterobasidion irregulare (formerly Heterobasidion annosum p-type),
is considered among the most destructive fungi in North American
forests. Unlike many forest insects and diseases that are attracted to
stands stressed by lack of management, HRD is most commonly found
in actively managed forest stands. Fresh cut stumps provide an ideal
entry path for airborne spores of HRD.
Stands that have been thinned multiple times are at high risk of infection
if spores from the fungus are present and successful at colonizing fresh
cut stumps. Proximity to established disease centers with mature fruiting
bodies increases risk due to the presence of increased inoculum. Red
pine, white pine and jack pine are at risk of infection as are to a lesser
degree white spruce, balsam fir, and tamarack.
There is concern that a statewide increase in the number of pine
18- 2015 Forest Health Highlights
Heterobasidion Root Disease continued

plantations, as well as the practice of multiple thinnings over the
life of the plantations, may actually favor the proliferation of HRD.
Several sites where the disease is well-established and causing
significant damage have been detected in Michigan. All of these
sites have a history of active management. HRD is a native pathogen
but, under these conditions, it has the potential to behave like an
invasive organism and cause significant mortality.
Forest Health staff will continue to delimit the extent of this disease
in 2016. Efforts are underway to establish a timeline for the disease
on some of the newly detected sites. This will help determine when
the initial infection may have occurred and how quickly the disease
is spreading across these sites in Michigan.
Monitoring plots have also been established in a plantation where
HRD is present to measure the rate of spread and rate of wood
volume loss as the disease progresses over the next few years.
New detections were made this year in Barry, Grand Traverse,
Kalkaska, Montcalm, Newaygo and Oceana counties. The disease has
been detected on private, private industrial, state game areas, state
forest land and national forest land.
With active HRD infections in Michigan, across much of Wisconsin
and the Canadian province of Ontario, early identification and
containment of HRD in Michigan remains a forest health priority.
Top: Aerial view of damage caused by Heterobasidion root disease near the
Muskegon River. Bottom left: The spore-producing fruiting bodies of Heterobasidion
Irregulare formed on a red pine stump in Barry County. Bottom right: Freshly cut discs
from red pine are used to mimic a fresh cut stump and are exposed for 24 hours to
survey for the presence of Heterobasidion spores.
Oak Wilt
Oak wilt is an aggressive tree disease that affects many species of
oak (Quercus spp.). It is one of the most serious tree diseases in the
eastern United States, killing thousands of oaks each year in forests,
woodlots and home landscapes. Once introduced to an area, oak
wilt spreads through root connections to adjacent oak trees.
Oak wilt was first identified in 1944. The fungal pathogen that causes
the disease, Ceratocystis fagacearum, is an exotic pathogen. Difficulty
in isolating and identifying the fungus delayed recognition of the
extent of its impact until the 1980s.
The oak wilt fungus moves in two ways: it is transported from treeto-tree through underground root connections, and it is spread
overland by sap beetles that carry oak wilt spores.
Oak wilt invades new areas when the fungus is carried by sap beetles
from infected wood (e.g., a tree, log or firewood) to a fresh wound on a
healthy oak. Trees killed by oak wilt produce spore pads the following
year. Sap beetles are attracted to these pads, where they feed and pick
up spores. The beetles are also attracted to fresh wounds.
Oak wilt infects a wounded oak when the tree is visited by sporecarrying sap beetles between April 15 and July 15. Most new oak
wilt outbreaks can be traced to damage from pruning, construction
and other tree-wounding activities, and from heavy winds.
Oak wilt is established widely in the southern Lower Peninsula, with
spotty distribution in the northern Lower and Upper peninsulas. As
people move northward into forested areas, the risk of spreading
this disease increases. People unknowingly cut oak wilt-killed trees
for firewood. Infected wood is then taken to camps or on camping
trips, where it will serve as a source of inoculum to infect nearby
Pulling stumps of newly infected trees prevents the oak wilt fungus from moving
through roots to other trees.
oaks wounded in the spring or early summer.

Michigans Oak Resource
U.S. Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data shows
there are 149 million red oak trees in Michigan greater than 5 inches
in diameter. There are 68 million red oak with diameters greater than
11 inches. This equals a volume of 11.9 billion board feet growing on
3.9 million acres of Michigan forest land. Ownership of this oak forest
land is 67 percent private, 22 percent state and local government,
and 11 percent federal.
Detecting, Confirming and Reporting Oak Wilt
Knowing the number and distribution of oak wilt pockets is crucial
Oak Wilt continued

to understanding the potential short- and long-term impacts of oak
wilt on Michigans oak resource. However, confirming oak wilt as
the cause of oak mortality is not always easy. Not all oak mortality
is caused by oak wilt. A good deal of oak mortality in Michigan
in the last decade is the result of drought, late-spring frosts, twolined chestnut borer and over-mature northern pin oak forests.
Additionally, new infections started by movement of firewood can
be difficult to confirm.
Often, a newly killed tree is felled and cut into firewood. This
firewood can serve as a source of new infections, whether its
stacked where it was cut, or is moved to areas near healthy oaks.
Removing the tree does not stop the disease. Neighboring oaks will
often begin dying in a year or two. Generally, it isnt until more oak
trees start dying that people begin seeking answers to the cause.
The Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Michigan State
University have stepped up efforts in recent years to detect and
confirm oak wilt in Michigan.
A grant from the U.S. Forest Service is funding a statewide effort to
detect, confirm and record oak wilt occurrence. As this information
becomes available, researchers can begin to investigate the distribution
and scale of the problem. Knowing where oak wilt occurs also helps
provides guidance for prevention and suppression activities.
As part of this effort in 2015, DNR Forest Health Program staff
conducted oak wilt training sessions for Ontario Ministry of Natural
Resources staff and Michigan Forestry Assistance Program (FAP)
foresters. These training sessions were conducted in the field in
the northern Lower Peninsula with an emphasis on field detection
and confirmation. The intent was to utilize FAP foresters and local
Oak Wilt continued

Conservation Districts to further detection, outreach and education
efforts across Michigan.
In 2015, the Michigan Invasive Species Grant Program (MISGP)
awarded funds to the Dickinson Conservation District to map and
treat oak wilt on non-industrial private forestland (NIPF) in Michigan.
The grant project has two goals:
Increasing the number of skilled individuals in the detection,
confirmation, and management of oak wilt disease.
Treating confirmed oak wilt sites in Dickinson, Menominee and
Alpena counties.
Since the training, FAP Foresters have conducted more than 150 oak
wilt-related site visits and confirmed 46 oak wilt sites around the state.
Remove oak wilt from state forest land in the Upper Peninsula
by detecting and treating infection centers.
Educate affected communities to prevent the reintroduction of
oak wilt.
Demonstrate an approach that can be used for detecting and
effectively removing the threat of oak wilt throughout Michigan.
This years project focus was the Shakey Lakes Area of
Menominee County. Thirty five oak wilt pockets totaling 116.5
acres were isolated by creating 26,845 feet of root-graft barriers
with a vibratory plow. All red oaks within these pockets will
be removed via timber sales before April 2016. All sites were
reviewed and treatments approved by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, affected Native American tribes and the State Historic
Preservation Office.
A.J. Campbell, Forestry Assistance Program forester, designed the

treatments and DDT Construction, Inc. installed the root-graft barriers.
Michigan State University Extension continued to evaluate past

oak wilt suppression efforts. Treated areas remain free of oak wilt
with few exceptions. Since the beginning of oak wilt control efforts
in this area in 2004, the size of epicenters has grown progressively
smaller. Many of the 2015 epicenters were only one or two years old,
averaging 1.7 acres. Although much has been achieved, untreated
oak wilt pockets remain. Diligence will be needed as we strive to
remove the threat of oak wilt to the Upper Peninsulas oak resources.
Treating Oak Wilt on State Forest Land and in State Parks
Lower Peninsula
The first oak wilt treatments focused on three ownerships in southern

Menominee County near the town of Wallace. Eleven oak wilt epicenters,
totaling 31 acres, were treated by installing 12,249 feet of root-graft
barriers with a vibratory plow. The landowners have arranged for the
removal of all red oaks within the root graft barriers before April 2016.
Upper Peninsula
The Forest Service has provided Oak Wilt Suppression funds to help
remove oak wilt from Michigans forests. The DNR and Michigan
State University Extension worked together in 2015 to:
Efforts to control and suppress oak wilt in the northern Lower

Peninsula were smaller in scope this year with treatments
concentrated in Grand Traverse, Benzie, Kalkaska and Missaukee
counties. In addition, two sites on the Huron National Forest in Iosco
County were treated.
Oak Wilt continued

The combination of vibratory plowing to stop underground
transmission and the suppression of symptoms to prevent mortality
and the production of spore producing pressure pads will stop the
spread of the disease at these sites. These sites will be monitored over
the next five years to evaluate efficacy of this approach.
Stump pulling was also used as a part of the northern Lower
Peninsula suppression project on a site where a new infection was
detected. If new infections to damaged trees are detected in the
summer when the infection first occurs, stumps can be pulled,
severing root connections and preventing the spread of the fungus
into the root system. This approach works well on single trees where
early detection and confirmation is possible. The site treated using
this technique resulted from damage that occurred in a timber sale
during the first week of June.
The vibratory plow blade used to treat infected stands of oak was specially designed
and built at the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Fire Experiment
Station in Roscommon. The plow cuts narrow trenches 5 feet deep to separate
underground root systems, preventing further spread of the oak wilt fungus to
uninfected trees.
It has been standard practice on state land to remove all red oaks from
within these treatment lines to prevent the progression of the disease
and the formation of pressure pads. This has been at times labor
intensive and logistically challenging.
In response, two smaller sites were selected this year and the
remaining red oaks within the treatment lines at these sites were
treated with injections of propiconazole in hopes of preventing the
development of symptoms.
The Michigan
Department of
Natural Resources
Forest Health
Program is testing
use of funcides
as a potential
treatment option
of oak wilt.
Beech Bark Disease

Since its discovery in Michigan in 2000, beech bark disease (BBD) has
spread widely through Michigans forests. This disease is triggered by
a white scale insect that attaches to bark and feeds on sap. Damage
from this feeding allows one of two Neonectria fungi to invade the
tree. The fungus inhibits the flow of sap through infested portions
of the tree, causing a general decline in tree health and eventually
killing the tree.
Controlling the natural spread of the disease is not feasible because
both the scale and fungus are moved by wind. Scales are also moved
by birds, bears and other animals feeding on beech nuts in the fall.
An infested tree is painted white by the tiny scale insects. A scaleinfested tree may still have healthy-looking foliage, even though
the trunk is weakened by the fungus. Infected trees are subject
to breakage, a process called beech snap. The trunk breaks in half
somewhere below the trees crown.
Trees prone to beech snap are deemed hazard trees and are
removed from state parks and campgrounds.
DNR Timber Sales Hauling Restriction
Because beech scales can be moved long distances, there has never
been a quarantine established. However, the Michigan Department
of Natural Resources enforces a timber sale restriction to help slow
the spread of beech scale from infested to non-infested counties.
The restriction is based on a map of currently infested counties and
is posted on the DNR Forest Resources Division Forest Health web
page: www.michigan.gov/foresthealth.
American beech wood products with bark still attached, other than
chips, are not to be transported from counties infested with beech
Aerial view of forest damaged by beech bark disease.
scale to or through uninfested counties in the Lower Peninsula or to

Wisconsin from July 15 to Nov. 15. Beech scale is mobile this time of
year and can move from infested wood to live beech.
A map showing counties in the Lower Peninsula currently infested
with beech scale can be found at: www.michigan.gov/foresthealth.
Resistant American Beech Project
Since 2002, the DNR has been working with Dr. Jennifer Koch at the
Northern Research Station (NRS) of the U.S. Forest Service to select
and breed American beech trees for resistance to BBD.
Beech trees resistant to BBD are resistant to the beech scale.
Cuttings from potentially resistant beech are sent to the NRS where
they are grown and tested for scale resistance. Techniques to
propagate resistant trees through grafting have been developed,
Beech Bark Disease continued

and genetic tests of full- and half-sibling families have demonstrated
that BBD resistance is heritable. These genetic studies suggest that
when both parents are resistant, approximately 50 percent of the
progeny can be expected to be resistant.
Currently, the project is focusing on identifying, selecting and
propagating resistant beech for establishing seed orchards. The DNR
Forest Resources and Wildlife divisions have joined forces to ensure
that these orchards are established.
The goal is to provide seed to regenerate resistant seedlings for
restoration plantings. The vision is the restoration of Michigans
American beech resource.
So far, five different beech bark disease-resistant parent combinations
have produced an average of 52 percent resistant progeny. Subsets of
seedlings from these families were out-planted in November 2011 in
the Upper Peninsula in an area heavily impacted by BBD. These trees
are within an exclosure and will be monitored annually for growth
characteristics and continued scale resistance.
Progress Report on Beech Scale Resistance Project
U.S. Forest Service & MDNR
Title: Identification, Propagation and Genetic Analysis of Beech
Scale-Resistant American Beech trees for the Development of Seed
Orchards in Michigan
Dr. Jennifer Koch, U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station,
Delaware, Ohio
Project Objective: To develop beech bark disease-resistant
Collecting scions from resistant beech.
American beech seed orchards and seed production areas for

restoration of aftermath forests in Michigan.
Progress:
1. Establishment of BBD-resistant seed orchards at the
Hardwood Tree and Regeneration and Improvement Center
(HTRIC) and the Kellogg Experimental Forest: Installation of
two replicate seed orchards was initiated in spring 2015. Upon
completion, each site will contain eight grafted ramets of each of
22 different resistant genotypes (a total of 176 trees) collected from
state land in the Upper Peninsula or from the Hiawatha National
Forest. A ramet is an individual member of a clone group. At the
HTRIC site 118 trees were planted and another 66 trees were planted
at the Kellogg orchard site. Both orchards are on schedule to be

members of an R x R mapping family at Holden Arboretum. Data was
collected in August 2015 and still indicated a residual effect from the
insecticide treatment of 2013, so the findings are not valid. The test
trees were also heavily infested with oyster shell scale. The decision
was made to bring the mapping family back to the Delaware lab
for cleanup of the oyster shell scale and to give the trees a year
to recover prior to attempting any additional scale bioassays. The
susceptible control trees included with the mapping family that
had also been accidentally treated with insecticide in 2013 were
re-challenged along with a set of susceptible controls that had not
been treated with insecticide. The data from these will be collected
in summer of 2016 and if all susceptible controls are found to be
equally highly infested, it will indicate that the residual insecticide
effect is low enough to allow a successful re-testing of the mapping
family in 2016.
Beech tree heavily infested with beech scale in the eastern Upper Peninsula. Photo by
Dr. Joe OBrien, U.S. Forest Service.
completed in spring 2016.

2. Grafting resistant beech genotypes for seed orchards: A total
of 264 graft attempts resulted in the production of 212 successful
new grafts. This includes the 168 grafts that will be used to complete
the HTRIC and Kellogg seed orchards. These grafts were transported
to the HTRIC in October 2015 for overwintering and will be planted
in spring 2016.
3. Beech Scale Resistance Screening: Beech scale egg bioassays
were set up in the summer 2014 (previous bioassay attempt in
2013 failed due to a misunderstanding that resulted in treatment
of the test trees with insecticide, making the data invalid) on 140
In addition to the mapping family egg bioassays, two small genetic

families that had at least one resistant parent from Michigan
were also challenged in 2014 and the data was collected on these
families in August 2015. These families had never been treated with
insecticide, so the results were informative and indicated that each
Michigan parent tree produced enough R progeny to be retained
in the seed orchards. Family 1229 X 1216 had 23 R (resistant), 3 I
(intermediate) and 12 S (susceptible) progeny and family 1229 X
D-9-1 had 16 R and 19 S progeny. The resistant progeny will be
retained for future outplantings.
Bioassays were also set up in August 2015 to confirm the resistance
off four parent genotypes included in the seed orchards that have not
been previously tested. Two ramets of each genotype were challenged
with scale eggs and the data will be collected in August 2016.

genetic data and quality control on the performance of parents
destined for inclusion in seed orchards. Once scale resistance data
is collected, resistant seedlings can be used in research plantings
to study the silvicultural requirements for successful reintroduction
of resistant beech in aftermath forests. In the longer term, such a
planting can be managed to become a seed production area.
5. Rootstock production: Approximately 1,500 beechnuts were
collected from four different trees at Dawes Arboretum in Newark,
Ohio. These parent trees have routinely produced viable seed that
have performed well as rootstock. The beechnuts are currently
in cold stratification and when germination begins in January/
February 2016, they will be sown in containers in the greenhouse.
They should produce rootstock that can be used for grafting in
winter 2017 and 2018 and would be suitable for grafting Lower
Peninsula resistant trees to be installed at the Michigan Tree
Improvement Center in Brighton.
Cooperative Beech Bark Disease Research Project
Michigan State Cooperative Tree Improvement Program/
Michigan State University Tree Research Center
4. Seedling production: We are continuing to rear the 374

seedlings from 16 different combinations between seven different
resistant Michigan parents. They are slated to be challenged in
bioassay experiments in summer 2016. These seedlings provide
The Michigan State Cooperative Tree Improvement Program

(MICHCOTIP) continued to assist the DNR and U.S. Forest Service
in the establishment of a beech seed orchard that will provide
planting stock resistant to beech bark disease (BBD). MICHCOTIP
continued to maintain the grafted beech seed orchard at the DNRs
Tree Improvement Center (TIC) in Brighton, Michigan, including
controlling weeds around surviving trees and maintaining fencing
and irrigation lines.
In 2015 work began on the establishment of a second seed orchard

at MSUs Kellogg Forest, located near Augusta, Michigan. The
development of the Kellogg orchard was necessary because the
low soil fertility at the TIC could not support the growth necessary
for the production of large quantities of beechnuts. The TIC beech
orchard site will continue to be used for non-orchard purposes.
At Kellogg Forest, 2.3 acres were prepared for planting by burning
and applying a broadcast application of 2,4-D and glyphosate. A
7-foot-high woven plastic
deer exclosure was
constructed around the
site prior to planting. A
map of the new orchard
was created using
software that helped
maximize the distance
between clones.
Upon completion, the
orchard will contain
176 ramets of 24 clones
known to be resistant
Whitewashing of beech bark caused by beech scale.
to BBD on 25 x 25
hexagonal spacing. This design was implemented in the field by
staking each ramet planting location and applying glyphosate to
control competing vegetation. Fifty-five ramets were planted during
spring 2015, with the remainder expected to be planted in spring
2016. The orchard was maintained throughout the growing season
with multiple mowings and herbicide applications.
Growth and survival of the ramets planted spring 2015 was
excellent, with the loss of only two trees.
Asian Longhorned Beetle

The Asian longhorned beetle (ALB) is an exotic pest that attacks
several species of North American hardwoods, including all species
of maple. ALB has been detected in New York City, Chicago, New
Jersey, Massachusetts and Ohio in the United States, as well as in
Toronto, Ontario.
ALB continues to infest trees in Massachusetts and New York. The
infestations in Chicago, New Jersey, and Toronto have been eradicated.
Closer to home, the infestation in Clermont County, Ohio, continues
to thwart eradication efforts. Nearly 1.7 million trees have been
surveyed, and 16,340 infested
trees and 60,247 high-risk host
trees have been removed.
This infestation is of particular
concern here in Michigan, where
a potentially devastating load of
infested firewood is only a
four-hour drive from our border.
Public education remains a critical
tool in our efforts to keep ALB out,
as firewood movement continues
to be the likely mode of entry for
most exotic forest pests.
The Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resource
Divisions Forest Health Program, in cooperation with DNRs Parks
and Recreation Division (PRD) continues to conduct intensive
surveys for ALB. Trees near fire rings that may have been exposed
to infested firewood are targeted. Zip codes are used to identify
campsites visited by campers from ALB-infested areas of the country.
To date, no ALB have been detected.
This is the fifth year the PRD surveyors have carefully searched for
signs of ALB in 73 state parks and recreational facilities. This effort
was initially support by a U.S. Forest Service grant. With the expiration
of the federal grant, PRD adopted and resourced the ALB survey
program, along with surveys for other invasive forest pests like
hemlock woolly adelgid and oak wilt.
ALB continues to be intercepted in warehouses and at ports in many
areas of North America. Quarantines have been established to prevent
these introductions and to prevent accidental spread of ALB from
infested areas. All infested trees are being removed, chipped and
burned. Regulations on solid wood packing material from China have
Asian Longhorned Beetle continued

ALB adults are large (3/4 to 1- inches long) with long black and
white banded antennae. The body is glossy black with irregular
white spots.
Eggs are deposited in niches
that are chewed into the bark
on tree trunks and branches.
As larvae mature, they enter
the heartwood of the tree,
destroying the value of the
wood. Feeding by large
numbers of beetle larvae
eventually weakens and
kills trees.
Asian longhorned beetle surveyors attend an annual refresher training session.
been established by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.

The Insect
The Asian longhorned beetle, Anoplophora glabripennis, is a
destructive wood-boring pest of maple and other hardwoods. ALB
was first discovered on several hardwood trees in the United States
in Brooklyn, New York, in August 1996. ALB is believed to have been
introduced into the United States from wood pallets and other wood
packing material accompanying cargo shipments from Asia.
Asian longhorned beetles favor maple trees, but infestations have
also been discovered in horse chestnuts, poplars, willows, elms, birch
and black locusts.
Adult beetles emerge the

following summer through
3/8-inch diameter holes in the
bark. Structural weakening of
trees by tunneling larvae also
poses a danger to pedestrians
and vehicles from falling
limbs or trees during wind
and/or ice storms.
For more information
about ALB, visit www.
asianlonghornedbeetle.com.
Top: Emergence holes caused by the Asian

longhorned beetle (ALB). Bottom:
Cross-section of ALB damage to a stem.
Jack Pine Budworm

Jack pine budworm populations continued to build slowly in
2015. There was a 15 percent increase in aerial survey detection
of budworm defoliation in 2015. Most of the damage occurred in
jack pine stands in the central and eastern areas of the northern
Lower Peninsula. Approximately 1,000 acres of defoliation were
also mapped on the east end of the Hiawatha National Forest in
Chippewa County in the Upper Peninsula. In total, nearly 118,000
acres were defoliated by jack pine budworm in 2015.
The jack pine budworm, Choristoneura pinus, is a native insect to
Michigan. Periodic outbreaks can lead to dieback and mortality in
older, over-mature jack pine stands. Current management practices
of harvesting older stands of jack pine help to reduce the risk of
widespread mortality.
Defoliation caused by jack pine budworm.

Eastern Larch Beetle

The eastern larch bark beetle (ELB), Dendroctonus simplex, continues to damage
tamarack (Larix larcinia) throughout the Upper Peninsula. Historically, once they
become epidemic, ELB act more as a primary invader and attacking healthy stands.
According to the Forest Insect & Disease Leaflet 175, U.S. Forest Service, titled
Eastern Larch Beetle by Seybold, S.J., M. Albers and S. Katovich, ELB outbreaks have
been extensive throughout North America since the 1970s. In Minnesota, tamarack
mortality has been mapped on 162,000 acres (10 percent of their tamarack resource)
in the last 10 years, with no signs of population collapse.
Signs of ELB attack include resin flow on the bark during summer months, and
yellowing foliage starting at the bottom of the tree in mid- to late summer. Tree tops
often remain green into the fall prior to fall color, making aerial detection of affected
stands difficult or impossible. These trees fail to leaf out the following spring. In the fall
and winter, woodpeckers often remove the bark as they feed on ELB.
Stress often triggers ELB outbreaks. Defoliation is most often cited as a causal factor.
Other stresses triggering ELB populations include flooding, drought and storm damage.
Once ELB becomes epidemic, there is no relation between ELB impacts and stand age,
upland versus lowland, or stand size. However, as older stands continue to age, they
become more susceptible. Tamarack is shade intolerant, so stress from competing
trees and vegetation can be a factor in well-stocked stands.
ELB builds populations in wind-thrown trees, log piles, snow breakage and logging debris.
Periodically cutting and removing dead and dying trees helps reduce ELB numbers.
Management guidance is to harvest mature tamarack when rotation age has been
attained, and to harvest tamarack stands if edge trees show signs of ELB activity. Once Tamarack killed by the eastern larch beetle.
ELB becomes established, it quickly moves throughout the stand. Again, impacts are
not generally seen until the following spring, when trees fail to leaf out. Thus, prompt
action is important if trees are to be harvested while still valuable for fiber and lumber.
Lecanium Scale
It is not unusual to find Lecanium scales on oaks and maples.
Occasionally, high scale populations reduce tree vigor enough to
cause branch mortality. Landscape or ornamental trees are most
commonly affected.
Scales typically infest smaller branches and twigs during the spring
and early summer. Eggs are produced underneath the female in
late spring. Eggs hatch in early summer and the immature insects
seek feeding sites on the underside of leaves.
In late summer, they migrate to twigs where they overwinter.
Insect parasites and predators are normally effective in controlling
infestations. Insecticides targeting immature scales in early-to
mid-summer are effective.
Lecanium scale on a maple branch.
Weather Impact
A Cool Wet Spring: My Trees Dont Look So Good
After suffering through two years of extremely cold winters in 2013
and 2014, many areas of Michigan were lambasted by a hard, latespring frost in May 2015. Many newly developing oak leaves were
killed by this late frost. Oak canopies with heavy leaf loss developed
new leaves by late in June. This killing frost was followed by
unseasonably cool, wet weather through much of June. As a result,
maple and oak tree leaves were subject to attack by leaf fungi. The
most common leaf blight was caused by Anthracnose fungi.
Anthracnose
Anthracnose diseases of hardwood trees are widespread throughout
the eastern United States. The most common symptom of these
diseases is dead areas or blotches on the leaves. Because of the
blackened and scorched appearance of the leaves, these diseases
are often called leaf blights.
Symptoms vary somewhat, depending on the host. Under certain
conditions, the whole leaf dies and falls prematurely. On some tree
species, the diseases may also damage twigs, shoots, buds and fruits.
Anthracnose fungi attack numerous hardwood species, including
ash, basswood, birch, elm, hickory, horsechestnut, maple, oak
and sycamore. The diseases are particularly severe on American
sycamore, white oak and other oaks in the white oak group, as well
as black walnut.
Sometimes, these species can be almost completely defoliated. Red
oaks appear to be less susceptible than the white oaks.
Symptoms on infected leaves range from tiny dead spots to large
Oak Anthracnose.
circular or irregular dead blotches, depending on the tree species.

Dead areas are black, brown or purple. Infection in the early spring
may turn the leaves black so that they resemble leaves damaged by
frost. If they are not killed by the fungi, young leaves may become
distorted by the unequal growth in healthy and infected parts.
Distorted leaves are common on oaks.
When severely infected, trees may lose their leaves. If this defoliation
occurs in spring or early summer, a tree will usually produce a
second crop of leaves later in the growing season.
Weather Impact continued

Oaks
spots darken and grow in size as the season progresses.
White oaks in areas affected by frost and unseasonably wet, cool

weather in June were especially hard hit by Anthracnose fungi.
Samples from these trees were sent to Dr. Jill D. Pokorny, Plant
Pathologist, U.S. Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State & Private
Forestry, Forest Health Protection in St. Paul, Minnesota. Her
response follows:
Trees infected with the tar spot fungus typically drop their leaves
earlier than normal in the fall. Tar spots on infected leaves produce
spores that will infect new leaves next spring if weather conditions
are favorable. Maple tar spot infections occur most commonly in
years when spring weather is cool and wet.
This is the shoot blight phase of Anthracnose. We do not often see

the shoot blight phase of anthracnose. Usually, we see only the
leaf blight phase. But, with the recent weather shift to more rain in
the early spring, leafspot diseases have been occurring for many
years in succession. Disease severity has increased due to a buildup
in inoculum levels, and more severe symptoms of shoot blight are
manifesting. White oaks are highly susceptible to anthracnose.
Fortunately, this leaf disease causes little damage to trees. However,

in some areas where tar spot has been heavily for three to four years,
some mortality of small branches indicative of a decline in tree vigor
appeared in 2015.
With this shoot blight phase, we are seeing some leaves that are
infected first via the petioles as the fungus spreads from twig
cankers and moves from the base of leaf petioles. Leaves with
damaged petioles that were infected with the anthracnose fungus,
have petioles that are leathery and tough. The petiole-infected
leaves had the water and nutrient supply cut off by the fungal
infection and they turned a generalized off-color as they declined.
Maples
Leaf blight of maples caused by Anthracnose fungi was also widely
reported. In addition, maple tar spot (Rhytisma spp.) was prevalent
again in areas affected for the last few years. This is a blight of
varieties of Norway maples, including Crimson King and Schwedler
maple. Beginning in late July or August, patches of raised black areas
on the upper leaf surface of Norway maples begin appearing. These
Maple tar spot.
Forest Health
Cooperator Reports
Protecting the health of Michigans forests is a challenging task.
Universities, state and federal agencies work in partnership to ensure
that research and detection activities are effective and timely.
Michigan Department of
Agriculture and Rural Development
Hemlock Woolly Adelgid
Hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA) was detected on four properties
in Ottawa and two properties in Muskegon County in 2015. These
were the first locations in which HWA has been found infesting
native forest hemlock in Michigan.
There are no known established
populations of HWA anywhere
else in Michigan. Past and present
HWA infestations in Michigan have
been reported by landscapers,
arborists, and other alert citizens
knowledgeable about HWA and its
potential impacts.
Prior to 2015, HWA had been
found infesting landscape hemlock
in Emmet (2006, 2007, 2010),
Macomb (2010 - two locations),
Ottawa (2010 - two locations),
Berrien (2012) and Allegan (2013)
counties. Eradication efforts were
initiated at each of the locations
Hemlock woolly adelgid-infested
the year they were detected. To
hemlock branch in Ottawa County,
date, surveys indicate no evidence Michigan. Photo courtesy of MDARD.
that HWA persists at any of these
locations.
So far, no clear source of the infestations has been found. It is likely
that hemlock nursery stock was brought to Michigan from infested
areas of the country either prior to, or in violation of, the Michigan
Department of Agriculture and Rural Developments (MDARD) Hemlock
Woolly Adelgid Quarantine was implemented in 2002. The quarantine
restricts the movement of hemlock into the state, and includes a ban on
movement of hemlock into the state from infested areas.
Delimit survey work has begun at the locations detected in 2015. In
Ottawa County, infested trees at three of the four properties have
been treated. In Muskegon County, infested trees at one of the two
properties have been treated. Plans are being made to treat infested
trees at additional locations in 2016. Treatments consisted of a
soil-injected application of dinotefuran. Samples collected in early
November from the treated trees, and analyzed by MSU Entomology
Department staff, indicated that treatments were very effective.
Samples of the HWA in Muskegon County were collected and sent to
the U.S. Forest Service for genetic testing in an attempt to determine
if they are eastern North American clones, or whether they could be
an introduction from western North America. This information will
help MDARD refine and improve its HWA regulatory activities.
A HWA response group with representation from MDARD/ Pesticide
and Plant Pest Management Division, MSU Entomology Department
and Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resource
Division has been working to development a HWA assessment
plan. The assessment plan will be used to inform those from which
funds to increase and continue response activities are being sought.
Activities at the infestation sites have been supported in part by a
Forest Health Protection grant from the U.S. Forest Service.
Michigan Department of Agriculture

and Rural Development continued
Emerald Ash Borer
In 2015, the United States Department of Agriculture - Animal
and Plant Health Inspection Service deployed 142 purple panel
traps baited with (Z)-3-hexanol in the Upper Peninsula counties
of Baraga, Dickinson, Gogebic, Iron, Marquette, Menominee and
Ontonagon.
Since 2012, emerald ash borer (EAB) trap placement has been
based on a survey sampling design developed in collaboration
between the APHIS EAB Program
and the USFS Health Technology
Enterprise Team.
Survey results will be announced
in early 2016. If a revision to the
States internal EAB quarantine is
needed due to trapping results that
will take place in early 2016 as well.
Michigan Department
of Agriculture and Rural
Development (MDARD) staff
continued to renew and issue intra-state compliance agreements
as necessary. MDARD maintains approximately 125 compliance
agreements with receivers, brokers and shippers. A majority
of these entities are in the UP or otherwise involved with the
intrastate movement of regulated materials into or within the
UP. MDARD staff continued to conduct compliance inspections
with EAB compliance agreement holders and write phytosanitary
certificates for ash logs and lumber being shipped internationally. The
movement of any article regulated by the EAB Quarantine from the
Lower Peninsula (L.P) to the U.P. continues to be prohibited, except
with a current and valid Compliance Agreement.
For more information about EAB visit www.emeraldashborer.info or
visit the MDARD EAB website at www.michigan.gov/eab.
Michigan State University

Do I Have to Treat My Ash Trees Forever?
Long-term Evaluation of Imidacloprid and Dinotefuran Used to
Protect Ash Trees from Emerald Ash Borer
Andrew Tluzcek and Deborah McCullough
Back in spring 2006, we selected 32 small white ash trees (Fraxinus
americana) growing in a field at Seven Lakes State Recreation Area
in Oakland County. In 2006, emerald ash borer (EAB) populations
were building in the area. These white ash trees appeared healthy
but other ash trees in the area, especially the green ash (F.
pennsylvanica), were beginning to decline and nearly all were dead
by 2010 or 2011.
The 32 white ash trees were randomly assigned to be treated with
one of the following means:
Imicide applied as a trunk injection with Mauget
capsules (imidacloprid).
A basal bark spray of Merit (imidacloprid).
A basal bark spray of Safari (dinotefuran).
Left untreated as a control.
We returned to the site and re-treated the trees in late May or early
June every year from 2006 to 2012.
Each summer, we collected leaves from all of the trees. We recorded
survival of adult EAB beetles caged with leaves from each tree and
collaborated with other scientists to quantify insecticide residues
in the leaves of the trees. We also monitored the condition of the
trees in mid-summer. Every fall, we recorded the number of EAB exit
holes, woodpecker holes (where the birds preyed on an EAB larva),
along with bark cracks over galleries and other variables. The sum
of the new exit holes and woodpecker holes indicate the number
of EAB that successfully developed that year. The holes are stapled
to ensure they are not re-counted in subsequent years. We have not
treated the trees since 2012, but we have continued to monitor their
condition and count EAB exit holes and woodpecker holes.
Exit holes left by emerging EAB beetles and woodpecker holes
peaked in 2008. On average, there were 14 to 27 EAB exits/
woodpecker holes per m2 of surface area on treated trees and 53
per m2 on the surviving control trees. By 2010, 10 of the 32 trees had
died, including five of the untreated controls and one or two trees in
each insecticide treatment.
Beginning in 2011, however, the EAB population in the area dropped
substantially. We found very few new exits or woodpecks on any
trees in 2011 or 2012, which led to our decision to stop applying the
insecticides. Residues in the foliage of treated trees declined rapidly
and were generally undetectable in 2013.
The number of EAB exits or woodpecks has remained very low since
then. On average, we found less than two exits/woodpecker holes
per m2 in 2013, 2014 and 2015. Trees that had been attacked by EAB
in between 2006 and 2010 appear to be recovering.
Canopies look good and trees are growing well. While EAB is clearly
present in the area, the local EAB population is not high enough
to overwhelm and kill trees. Our previous studies have shown EAB
beetles prefer green ash over white ash. Given the lack of live green
ash trees in this area, it seems likely that the white ash trees have
effectively survived the EAB invasion.
Michigan State University continued

Can systemic insecticides protect against
beech bark disease?
James B. Wieferich & Deborah G. McCullough
High-value American beech (Fagus grandifolia) trees in residential
and urban landscapes, as well as forested areas, are threatened by
beech bark disease. Beech bark disease begins when tiny, non-native
beech scale insects colonize the trunk and branches of beech trees.
The scales secrete white wax as they feed and heavily infested trees
appear to have wool on the bark. Wounds created when the sapfeeding scale insects pierce the bark enable a non-native Neonectria
fungus to infect the tree. The fungus kills patches of inner bark
(phloem) and cambium, causing branches and eventually the entire
tree to die. Several studies have evaluated beech bark disease
impacts in forests and silvicultural guidelines were developed for
northern hardwood forest types. There are, however, virtually no
effective options for controlling beech scale and protecting valuable
beech trees in landscape settings.
We are currently evaluating potential options to control beech scale.
An insecticide sold as TreeAzin (azidirachtin) is applied by injecting
the product into the base of the trunk, then allowing the tree to
transport the insecticide in the xylem tissue up the trunk and into
the branches. Another insecticide sold as Safari (dinotefuran) can
be applied by spraying the lower 4 to 5 feet of the trunk. Because
this product is highly soluble, the insecticide can move through the
outer bark and into the xylem without requiring injection.
We are also evaluating a different kind of product called Pentra Bark.
This is not an insecticide but is simply a soapy detergent sometimes
used as a surfactant with insecticide or fungicide applications. If
Dr. Deborah
McCullough,
Michigan State
University professor,
injects an infested
beech tree with
TreeAzin.
the Pentra Bark breaks down the wax secreted by the beech scale
insects, it could effectively provide a non-toxic means to control
the insects. In addition, we will monitor aspects of the life history of
beech scale, including egg production, hatch rates, development
and survival of scale life stages. Collaborators, Dr. Jean Berube (CFS)

and Dr. Richard Wilson (OMNR), attempted
to develop molecular markers to detect
presence of Neonectria spp. in bark/phloem
samples and determine whether the presence
or abundance of beech scale correlates with
presence of Neonectria spp. mycelium with
little success.
To evaluate the products, we selected 36-48
trees in each of three sites in Mason County
in June and early July. Insecticides were
applied at different times during the summer,
to target either the mature female scales
or to target young, immature scales just
beginning to feed. To estimate beech scale
density and survival on, we collected bark
punches and took digital images of 15x15 cm
areas on opposite sides of the trunk of each
tree. We can examine bark punches under
a microscope to count live and dead scales,
monitor reproduction and assess egg hatch.
Digital images of bark are processed using
software that records the area of the image
covered by scale wax. We can then estimate
scale density per cm2 of bark using a simple
linear regression we developed a few years
ago. Effectiveness of the treatments will be
determined next summer when we re-sample
the trees and compare beech scale density on
treated and untreated trees.
Left: Applying an insecticide treatment

to the trunk of a beech scale-infested
tree. Above: Following treatments, bark
samples collected with an arch punch
are used to measure beech scale density
and survival.

Evaluating Trap Designs for EAB Detection
Deborah G. McCullough & James B. Wieferich
Effective methods to detect and monitor populations of emerald
ash borer (EAB) remain a critical aspect of managing this invasive
pest across much of the U.S. External symptoms of infestation
such as bark cracks, D-shaped exit holes left by emerged adults
and declining canopies are
not apparent until larval
densities build to moderate
or high levels. Adult beetles
do not produce long-range
pheromones, but use visual
stimuli and volatiles to locate
host trees, where they also are
likely to find potential mates.
In general, male beetles are
Double decker emerald ash borer trap with
attracted to specific shades
a green and purple prism.
of green while female beetles
are more attracted to shades
of purple. Beetles are also attracted to light. For example, trees in full
sunlight will be colonized sooner and at high densities than similar
trees that are shaded.
In 2015, we continued our efforts to determine whether artificial
traps for EAB detection methods can be improved. Double-decker
(DD) traps consist of two plastic coroplast prisms (each 16 x 25
inches) covered with clear Pestick. One prism is zip tied to the top of
a 10-feet-tall PVC pipe (4 inches in diameter) and the second prism is
similarly attached halfway down the pipe. The PVC slides over and is
supported by a T post. Lures to attract EAB are attached to the lower
edge of each prism. The DD traps are placed in full sun, usually 15
to 30 feet from ash trees along the edge of a wooded area. This trap
design incorporates both visual cues (color, sun) and olfactory cues
(volatile compounds in the lures) to attract EAB beetles.
Studies in 2015 included collaborating with U.S. Forest Service
researchers to compare standard DD traps with two dark purple
prisms to DD traps with green prisms on top and a lighter shade of
purple on the bottom. The green-light purple DD traps captured
more EAB overall than the DDs with two dark purple prisms. Sex
ratios of EAB captured on the green-purple traps, however, were
highly male-biased, while the dark purple prisms captured a higher
proportion of females. This is potentially interesting given that
mature female EAB are able to fly farther than males and, if mated,
can initiate new infestations. We also assessed inexpensive methods
to increase EAB attraction to DD traps. Small disco balls or mirrors
to reflect sunlight onto the panels were evaluated but did little to
improve EAB captures.
We continued to collaborate with several other scientists to evaluate
different lures and trap designs. Our portion of the project involved
setting up four blocks of traps in each of two sites with low EAB
densities in the eastern Upper Peninsula. Each block included a
standard DD trap and a green-light purple DD trap, one purple
canopy trap distributed by U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal
and Plant Health Inspection Service for the national EAB detection
survey, a dark green canopy trap used in Canada and a green
funnel trap. All traps were baited with a cis-3-hexenol lures and the
green canopy trap was also baited with cis-lactone, a short range
EAB pheromone. Similar designs were set up in sites in Ontario,
Pennsylvania and Ohio. Data analysis is underway.

2015 Michigan Exotic Forest Pest Survey
Sara R. Tanis and Deborah G. McCullough
We cooperated with the Michigan Department of Agriculture & Rural
Development (MDARD), the Michigan Department of Natural Resources
and U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service to survey more than 60 different sites for invasive forest pests
not yet known to be established in the U.S. or in Michigan.
Sixteen insect species were targeted for this survey, including bark
beetles, woodborers, and defoliators that feed on the leaves or
needles of a wide range of trees. Several types of insect traps were
used in the survey. Funnel traps and cross vane traps were set up to
trap bark beetles and woodborers, while wing traps, delta traps and
milk carton traps were used for moths. Each trap was baited with
a pheromone lure to attract a specific pest species or with volatile
compounds produced by the host trees of the target insect.
We selected 28 recreational sites based on potential invasion
pathways commonly associated with the movement of firewood,
nursery or landscape trees, and logs. Sites included state parks
and recreation areas, sawmills, and tree nurseries. To select sites
for trapping, we compiled risk maps for the Upper and Lower
peninsulas using spatial data layers, point data and derived
coverages in a GIS, then weighted the factors to prioritize trapping
sites. Variables included forest cover type, state park visitor data,
and sawmill, campground, railroad and highway data. For example,
Tahquamenon Falls State Park is surrounded by maple-dominated
forest and is considered a high-risk site because the park attracts
visitors from zip codes where Asian longhorned beetle is present.
quantities of steel, or other metals or plastics are imported. Such

commodities often arrive with pallets, wood crating and similar
items known to vector wood and phloem-feeding insects. Other
high-risk industrial sites included companies that produce or use
large amounts of unprocessed wood, along with rail yards, airports
with frequent cargo flights, and landfills that accept commercial or
industrial waste.
Permits or permission to deploy traps were acquired for all sites.
Traps were set up and baited in May and June to ensure they were
present when target pests would likely be active. We collected
insects from the traps every two to four weeks and replaced lures as
needed throughout the summer. Insects collected in the traps are
stored in a freezer until they can be sorted, pinned and identified.
Because many native insects are attracted to, and captured by the
traps, sorting and identification is a laborious process. We began
this part of the work in July and hope to complete identifications
in January 2016. Personnel from MSU will identify the longhorned
beetles, metallic woodborers and horntails, while MDARD personnel
will identify weevils and bark beetles. Happily, we have not found
any of the forest pests targeted in the survey so far and we hope that
will continue to be the case.
We also surveyed 34 industrial sites where automotive parts, large


White Ash Survival in Forested Sites in the Core of the
Emerald Ash Borer Invasion
Molly Robinett and Dr. Deborah McCullough
Dept. of Forestry & Dept. of Entomology, Michigan State University,
East Lansing, Michigan
Since its discovery in 2002 in the Detroit Metro area, emerald ash
borer (EAB) (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire) has caused catastrophic
levels of ash mortality. In previous studies, scientists from MSU,
Ohio State University and the U.S. Forest Service reported greater
than 99 percent of the white ash (Fraxinus americana L.), green ash
(F. pennsylvanica Marsh.) and black ash (F. nigra Marsh.) in plots in
southeast Michigan and Ohio were killed by this destructive pest.
These reports have led forest managers across the U.S. and Canada
to assume that ash are effectively doomed once EAB arrives. We have
observed, however, an unexpectedly high proportion of overstory
white ash trees remain alive in some sites in southeast Michigan,
despite the presence of EAB in these areas for 10 years or more.
In 2014, we surveyed more than 40 large forested parks, game areas
and recreation areas across southeast and central Michigan. We
found 28 sites where white ash, living and dead, were abundant.
Within each site, we established a center point in the midst of
the white ash. We then inventoried forested land using variable
radius plots to document the species, diameter (DBH) and canopy
condition of overstory trees (greater than or equal to 6 centimeters
DBH) within a 1.5 kilometer radius.
We more intensively surveyed a 1 hectare area where white ash
trees were most abundant at each of the 28 sites. White ash and
other overstory trees (greater than or equal to 6 centimeters) were
counted, measured and canopy condition assessed in four fixed
Molly Robinett prepares to measure diameter at breast height (DBH) of a healthy

white ash tree.
radius macroplots (18 m). Regeneration (seedlings, saplings and

recruits) of all species were also documented. We then calculated
the proportion of white ash trees that are alive and dead overall and
by dbh class for each site.
We recorded a total of 2,546 white ash trees across the 28 sites.
White ash survival rates within sites range from less than 5 percent
to more than 90 percent of the trees. Overall, 74 percent of the white
ash are alive and nearly all (96 percent) are healthy with less than 50
percent canopy dieback or thinning. We monitored EAB population
levels in both 2014 and 2015 using two double-decker (DD) traps
consisting of two purple or green prisms attached to a 3 meter tall
PVC pipe and baited with cis-3-hexenol and Manuka oil. Similar

numbers of EAB were captured in 2014 and 2015, with numbers
ranging from less than five to 64 EAB in individual sites.
Our results to date indicate EAB populations persist in all sites.
There are sites where nearly all white ash have been killed, but
there are more areas where most of the white ash remain alive
and relatively healthy. Trees are recovering from past EAB attacks;
we often see new wood and bark laid over old EAB larval galleries.
Populations of EAB seem unlikely to build to densities associated
with the catastrophic white ash mortality levels recorded in other
areas. We are currently analyzing site-related variables, surrounding
vegetation, presence of corridors and land-use categories using a
GIS to determine if specific factors are consistently associated with
high or very low white ash survival rates. If so, then we should be
able to test a model and assess our ability to predict the likelihood of
white ash survival in areas that are not yet infested with EAB.

Michigan Eyes on the Forest and Sentinel Tree Network
Deborah G. McCullough, Manuel Colunga-Garcia, Amos Ziegler,
Russell Kidd, William Cook, Julie Crick, Georgia Peterson
and Michael Schira
Dept. of Entomology, Dept. of Forestry, Center for Global Change &
Earth Obs., Michigan State University and MSU Extension
Michigan forests have dealt with more than their fair share of
invasive insect and pathogen pests. This is not a new phenomenon
white pine blister rust, for example, was present in Michigan by
1917. More recent invaders include Dutch elm disease, gypsy moth,
several European sawflies, pine shoot beetle, along with beech scale
and beech bark disease. The worst of the worst, emerald ash borer,
got its start in Michigan and has become the most destructive forest
insect to ever invade North America. In fact, at least 49 of the 62
high impact invasive forest pests in the U.S. are well-established
in Michigan. Effects of these unwanted alien insects and pathogens
include substantial economic costs and sometimes profound
changes in native forest ecosystems. A recent study showed
economic costs of invasive forest insects in the U.S. exceed $4 billion
annually. These costs, largely borne by municipal governments and
homeowners, do not include the cascading ecological effects on
other plants, animals and ecosystem services.
Unfortunately, things could get worse. Major pests, including
Asian longhorned beetle (ALB) which attacks maples and several
other trees, hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA), and thousand cankers
disease (TCD) of walnut are present in other northeastern states
as well as Ontario. These invasive pests could cause substantial
damage if they spread through Michigan. Thanks to a recent grant
from the Michigan Invasive Species Grant Program, MSU scientists,
MSU Extension foresters and Conservation District foresters have

launched a statewide effort to build awareness about the risks of
these and other unwanted forest pests and to increase the likelihood
of early detection if a new invasive forest pests become established.
The multi-faceted project, Eyes on the Forest: Invasive Forest Pest
Risk Assessment, Communication and Outreach, involves modeling
to assess likely invasion pathways and mapping to identify relative
risks of establishment of ALB, HWA and TCD.
Several MSU Extension and
Conservation District foresters
are providing information on the
three target pests and forest
invasives in general to a wide
range of groups and property
owners. Communication is
facilitated by the Midwest Invasive
Species Information Network
(MISIN) website, housed at MSU.
A unique aspect of this project
involves creating a Sentinel Tree Network across Michigan.
Volunteers agree to adopt an individual tree, then periodically
monitor and report on the condition of that tree two or three times a
year. As this network expands, more eyes will be looking at trees for
unusual signs or symptoms that may indicate a new invasive pest.
Sentinel Tree volunteers do not need to be professional foresters
or arborists, but they should have enough expertise to identify the
species of their tree, measure its diameter and assess its general
condition. Volunteers then submit information about their tree
through the on-line MISIN website.

The Sentinel Trees will provide a record of individual
tree health across a sizeable expanse and over time,
supplementing scientific and regulatory surveys. To date,
at least 100 people have volunteered to adopt a Sentinel
Tree and we hope many more people will join this effort.
To volunteer or to request more information, contact
Russell Kidd, Eyes on the Forest outreach coordinator at
kidd@msu.edu.
Maple
Walnut
Hemlock
Cooperative Invasive Species

Management Areas
In 2015, Michigans Invasive Species Grant Program (MISGP)
devoted funds to invasive species management across the state.
One of the focus areas of this program was to fund the creation and
empowerment of regional collaborations to more effectively manage
invasive species. These collaborations, termed Cooperative Invasive
Species Management Areas (CISMA), have a diverse membership and
contribute to all aspects of invasive species management.
The boundaries and membership of each CISMA are truly unique.
CISMAs are grass-roots movements that come together to pool
resources, overcome political boundaries and increase organization
within important ecological boundaries. Their steering committees
and membership are made up of local volunteers passionate about
invasive species management. They represent a diverse group of
entities and jurisdictions.
CISMAs recognize that invasive species issues in neighboring
jurisdictions often spread and become everyones problem. In many
cases, local, state and federal agencies and nonprofit organizations
are willing to coordinate and contribute resources where
partnerships have not existed in the past. For example, invasive
species management efforts on national and state forest land are
collaborating with local CISMAs to ensure that eradication efforts are
not thwarted by invasive populations on adjacent lands.
CISMA activities can be loosely grouped into four main areas:
outreach and education; prevention; early detection and response;
and treatment of infestations. Some Michigan residents may only
hear about invasive species when they appear on television or the
Cooperative Invasive Species

Management Areas continued
front page of a newspaper. CISMAs have been an effective local
resource for educating people on invasive species issues as well as
promoting active participation in management efforts.
CISMAs are able to focus on current and future invasive species of
greatest relevance to their local area. Their outreach efforts also serve
to emphasize the importance of prevention, which remains the most
efficient and effective means of invasive species management.
In addition to outreach efforts, CISMAs serve to map new and
existing invasive species infestations within their boundaries.
CISMA members and engaged citizens help to map invasive species
occurrences using a centralized reporting and mapping system, the
Midwest Invasive Species Information Network (www.misin.msu.
edu). This network alerts managers to new infestations and is an
integral part of the early detection and response strategy. When new
infestations are detected, CISMA resources can be used to respond
with appropriate treatment. These resources range from MISGP
grant funds to coordination of volunteer efforts. Whatever decisions
are ultimately made, the process is a collaborative effort made by
the people of the CISMA.
CISMAs currently cover 65 of the 83 counties in Michigan. Ideally,
every county in Michigan will be part of a CISMA in the near future.
The DNR is taking steps to encourage and facilitate reaching this goal.
To learn more about your local CISMA, or ways to get involved,
please visit www.Michiganinvasives.org.
Northwest Michigan Invasive Species Network volunteers, in partnership with the

Frankfort Tree Board, remove garlic mustard from Tank Hill in Benzie County, Michigan.
Grand Traverse
Conservation District
Employees and SEEDS
crew members work
together to install a boot
brush station at Historic
Barns Park in Traverse
City Commons. Patrons
use this station to clean
seeds, mud, and other
plant material from their
boots, in order to prevent
them from spreading
invasive plants.
This project was funded in whole or in part through a grant awarded by the
USDA, Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry.
The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

2015 Forest Health Highlights MDNR

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2015 Forest Health Highlights MDNR

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2015

The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is committed to the conservation,

For more information, visit www.michigan.gov/dnr.

Forest Resource Overview

The solution to this crisis lies largely in public awareness.

Michigans Eastern Hemlock:

Hemlock Woolly Adelgid continued

depth. Other animals commonly associated with hemlock-dominated

Hemlock Woolly Adelgid continued

discolor and drop prematurely. The loss of new shoots and

Hemlock trees killed by hemlock woolly adelgid.

Hemlock Woolly Adelgid continued

8 - 2015 Forest Health Highlights

Hemlock Woolly Adelgid Infestation History in Michigan

Balsam Woolly Adelgid

Top: Twig gouting

Balsam woolly adelgid is a sap-feeding insect that attacks true firs,

program to be shipped into Michigan.

2015 Forest Health Highlights - 9

Aerial Survey & Digital Mobile Sketch Mapping

The DNR Forest Health Program aerial surveyors have been

The new Digital Mobile Sketch Mapping (DMSM) system introduces

Data collected with the DMSM are synchronized via wireless

10 - 2015 Forest Health Highlights

Aerial Survey continued

EAB Damage Mapped

This capability provides field staff an efficient method of giving

Insects & Diseases

12 - 2015 Forest Health Highlights

Trees damaged by spruce budworm.

Spruce Budworm continued

Spruce budworm larva.

have resulted in the loss of millions of cords of spruce and fir.

Spruce Budworm continued

2015 Forest Health Highlights - 15

Redheaded Pine Sawfly

Top: Redheaded pine

remains of needles partially consumed by the young larvae. Older

White Pine Decline

scale is most often associated with a particular species of lichen,

Heterobasidion Root Disease

Heterobasidion Root Disease continued

2015 Forest Health Highlights - 19

oaks wounded in the spring or early summer.

Oak Wilt continued

Oak Wilt continued

A.J. Campbell, Forestry Assistance Program forester, designed the

Michigan State University Extension continued to evaluate past

Treating Oak Wilt on State Forest Land and in State Parks

The first oak wilt treatments focused on three ownerships in southern

Efforts to control and suppress oak wilt in the northern Lower

Oak Wilt continued

2015 Forest Health Highlights - 23

Beech Bark Disease

Aerial view of forest damaged by beech bark disease.

scale to or through uninfested counties in the Lower Peninsula or to

Beech Bark Disease continued

Collecting scions from resistant beech.

American beech seed orchards and seed production areas for

Beech Bark Disease continued

completed in spring 2016.

In addition to the mapping family egg bioassays, two small genetic

Beech Bark Disease continued

4. Seedling production: We are continuing to rear the 374