GENERAL EDUC
UNIVERSITY
p00 glean ould
Fase 721257
Ornce oF Gases
EoucaTion|
ELL Cre Curie
phone 61-4506183
for BISA 6150
TION
April 22, 2010
Dear Committee Members,
Serving as Ms. Angela Smith's mentor during her year-long residency at Belmont University
hhas been an absolute pleasure, and has given students here a unique and rewarding experience
in engaging the historical enterprise with a level of depth and creativity that we all wish
would happen much more often. ‘Throughout the year, I have had the opportunity not only to
offer her my assistance in approaching her classes with an eye toward experiential learning,
but also to have learned a great deal in the process myself with respect to locating effective
strategies to motivate undergraduate students to engage the study of history in an active way.
When Ms. Smith approached me about the idea of a resideney, | was quite excited about the
prospects for her to work in our general education program, specifically in the Junior
‘Cornerstone Seminar, an upper-level course required of all students at Belmont, rooted in
Problem-Based and Experiential Learning. Ms. Smith’s approach to teaching, and the nature
‘of her own work, seemed to be an ideal fit for this class, and the results have been
exceptional
At the beginning of the residency, Ms. Smith brought to me a number of general
possible approaches to teaching her courses. While it was clear that she was bringing a
considerable amount of expertise, both technical and historical, to bear on her teaching, it
became evident that some immersion into Problem-Based Learning pedagogy would be an
appropriate and rewarding point of departure for the year. In our meetings, we covered all
aspects of Problem-Based Learning—question and problem framing, the importance of
authenticity in developing student assignments, and particularly, the need for ongoing and
formative assessment of student collaboration. Ms. Smith approached all of this with her
Usual sense of commitment and energy. and launched into her courses equipped to conn
her own experience and passions with a new approach to teaching. As anyone who has a
background in education knows, this is no small task—the development of new methods of
teaching may bring into play uncertainty and, at times, a lack of confidence that can
undermine student leaning. We met regularly throughout the courses, taking time to
evaluate successes and setbacks and to connect her teaching zoals with the intended outcomes,
of Junior Comerstone Seminar.
‘The measure of teaching effectiveness, of course, is rooted directly in student outcomes; that
is, to ascertain what exactly students have been able to accomplish as a result of taking a
particular course. In Ms, Smith's courses at Belmont, these outcomes are quite clear. First,
the products of the students themselves must be considered. The documentary films that
students completed in her courses are of excellent quality, particularly for undergraduate
students and especially for students who are not pursuing a degree in history. Moreover, Ms.
\mw.belmont.edulgened‘Smith's approach to assessment, rooted in Problem-Based Learning, also has ensured that these students
also had the important experience of evaluating theit own work, and that of their peers, in an ongoing and
formative manner—a set of skills that seldom is required in the undergraduate classroom. In terms of
historical content, it seems clear from the student work that these students have engaged historical topics
at a level of depth quite rare for a general education history course. Her course evaluations, which I have
reviewed, also indicate that students have seen the usefulness of the course and have come away from it
with a positive attitude. In short, Ms. Smith's teaching was superb, and Belmont has benefited from her
work here.
nally, there is the question of how this innovative approach to teaching, sharpens the skills of an
historian—not only in terms of teaching, but in terms of historical knowledge. While a Problem-Based
Learning course may appear to be one that is “light on content,” nothing could be further from the truth
In point of fact, historians who approach education in a experiential, problem-oriented manner most often
discover that one’s knowledge base is stretched to the limit. Without a set of lecture notes, without a
clear roadmap, the teacher in the experiential classroom must be prepared to adapt to the interests, and
discoveries, of the students. Moreover, the time commitment involved can oftentimes be overwhelming.
Not only must an instructor cover content in a course, but also must be serious about teaching research
skills, creativity, critical thinking, and also be prepared to get students out of the classroom and into the
field,” so to speak. My view is that Ms, Smith met these challenges, excelled, and also came away from
the experience a better teacher and a better historian, 1 know, without question, that the experience has
offered me a chance to revisit my approach to teaching and also recent American history, This has been
an excellent experience, I think, for all involved
Y 2). Ch~
Jeffrey W. Coker, Ph.D.
Assistant Provost
Associate Professor of F
Belmont University
story