Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
WESTERN DIVISION
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
vs.
LED ZEPPELIN, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on May 10, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. or as soon
thereafter as the matter may be heard in Courtroom 850 of the above-entitled District
Court, located at 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, California, defendants James
Patrick Page, Robert Anthony Plant, John Paul Jones, Warner/Chappell Music, Inc.,
Company and Warner Music Group Inc., will move the above-entitled Court, the
Honorable R. Gary Klausner, United States District Judge presiding, for an Order
10
This Motion is brought on the grounds that, as stated more fully in the
11
12
to opine as to matters that are not relevant, his testimony and opinions are not
13
reliable, and his testimony and opinions will unfairly prejudice defendants, confuse
14
the issues, mislead the jury, delay the trial and waste trial time.
15
This Motion is based upon this Notice of Motion and Motion, the
16
Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed with this Notice of Motion and
17
Motion, the pleadings and papers on file in this action, the matters of which this
18
Court may take judicial notice, and such additional matters and oral argument as
19
20
The Motions are made following the conference with plaintiffs counsel
21
pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, which took place on March 22, 2016.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
INTRODUCTION
other Led Zeppelin recordings and other songs have been noted by some. His
8
9
10
11
12
years preceding his filing of this action. Testimony as to Stairway to Heaven prior
13
success and implicitly, prior revenues that are beyond the reach of plaintiffs
14
claims will only confuse issues and mislead the jury, all to defendants prejudice.
15
16
than Taurus, here in the guise of a historical experts testimony, are irrelevant,
17
unreliable no attempt is made to prove the validity of the claims and unduly
18
prejudicial.
19
20
21
(a)
22
23
Anderson Decl. at 10, 3, & Exh. 1. But, (1) he does not disclose his claimed
24
qualifications, (2) he does not include copies of the materials he cites, (3) aside from
25
26
authored in the previous ten years and (4) does not identify other cases in which he
27
has testified as an expert in the preceding four years. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)-
28
///
3
(iii)-(v). Neither did he sign his Report as required by Rule 26(a)(2)(B), and instead
These are not trivial matters. Initial expert disclosures were due February 10,
2016, and defendants were entitled to know then Somachs qualifications, his
publications, the materials he relied upon and his prior experience, or the lack
thereof, as an expert. Also, his actual signature is required by Rule 26 for a reason:
to confirm Somach, rather than plaintiffs counsel, prepared his Report and Somach
approved it.
10
(b)
11
12
form of an opinion or otherwise if: (a) the expert's scientific, technical, or other
13
specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to
14
determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the
15
testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and (d) the expert has
16
reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case.
17
In addition, the Court must ensure that any and all scientific testimony or
18
evidence admitted is not only relevant, but reliable. Daubert v. Merrell Dow
19
Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 589 (1985). In its role as gatekeeper, the district court
20
determines the relevance and reliability of expert testimony and its subsequent
21
admission or exclusion. Barabin v. AstenJohnson, Inc., 700 F.3d 428, 431 (9th Cir.
22
2012) on rehg en banc sub nom. Estate of Barabin v. AstenJohnson, Inc., 740 F.3d
23
24
scientific testimony [but] to all expert testimony. Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael,
25
The party offering the expert bears the burden of establishing that Rule 702
26
27
is satisfied. In re ConAgra Foods, Inc., 302 F.R.D. 537, 549 (C.D. Cal. 2014).
28
///
4
(c)
(1)
and . . . the public at large is not relevant to plaintiffs claim that Stairway to
10
11
12
Zeppelin, as opposed to, e.g., the relative popularity of Stairway to Heaven and other
13
recordings on the album Led Zeppelin IV, or the importance of Led Zeppelins
14
popularity and the performances and skill of its members, to sales of Stairway to
15
16
Further, the Copyright Acts three year statute of limitations strictly limits any
17
potential profit award to profits from the exploitation of Stairway to Heaven after
18
May 31, 2011. See, e.g., Jt. R. 26(f) Report (Doc. 75) at 4, 6; 17 U.S.C. 507(b);
19
Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 1962, 1969 (2014) (Under the
20
Acts three-year provision, an infringement is actionable within three years, and only
21
three years, of its occurrence). The historical popularity of Stairway to Heaven also
22
is not relevant because defendants are insulated from liability for earlier [alleged]
23
24
25
Zeppelin concerts in the 1970s, that it was the most requested song on radio thirty to
26
forty years ago, that the press estimated it to have generated $562 million since
27
1971 and that 40 million copies of the album Led Zeppelin IV have been sold since
28
///
5
1971, are not only unsubstantiated but irrelevant because plaintiff is strictly limited
(2)
merely labels himself a historian and archivist of Led Zeppelin with extensive
methodology, if it can be called that, is to quote from articles and books, doing no
10
more than serving as a mouthpiece for plaintiff to get before the jury articles and
11
12
13
14
(3)
15
16
17
Further, his
403.
18
19
example, his testimony that Stairway to Heaven has generated $562 million since
20
21
foundation and not probative of what Stairway to Heaven has earned since May 31,
22
2011, the only revenues in issue. As another example, Somachs testimony and
23
24
the public is not only speculative but not probative of revenues since May 31, 2011.
25
For
Balanced against the lack of any probative value, is the undeniable prejudice
26
27
importance or earnings in the past will only confuse the issues and mislead the jury,
28
which can only award relief, if at all, as to profits from alleged infringements within
three years preceding the filing of this case, and in doing so unfairly prejudice
3
4
5
Somachs testimony and opinions are properly excluded under Federal Rule of
Evidence 403.
(d)
(1)
10
Heaven that he claims people have suggested may be copied from other works, none
11
12
eschews any personal knowledge or view as to the truth of those suggestions, merely
13
repeating them as gossip. Exh. 1 at 3 (It is not my place in this report to comment
14
15
plaintiffs attempts to prejudice the jury by parading unproven and even unasserted
16
Somach also
17
18
Bailey, 696 F.3d 794, 801 (9th Cir. 2012); see, Def. Motions in Limine No. 5 at 3-4.
19
20
(2)
21
22
Neither are Somachs testimony and opinion that people have claimed to
23
hear similarities between other Led Zeppelin recordings and other works the result
24
25
background or even familiarity with the other songs, and does not claim to have
26
27
repeat gossip and innuendo. That is not reliable testimony and he is properly
28
excluded.
7
He claims no musicological
(3)
That some people have suggested other Led Zeppelin recordings borrowed
from other songs is, as a matter of law, not proof there was copying here. Bailey,
probative.
On the other hand, plaintiffs use of Somach and other claimed experts to get
defendants. Testimony of other unsubstantiated claims will confuse the issue, which
10
11
12
mislead the jury, which will assume the Court allows the testimony because it is to
13
be taken into account. And once that testimony is heard, the damage cannot be
14
undone. Also, testimony as to irrelevant and unproven claims will waste trial time
15
16
Somach and this testimony are properly excluded under Federal Rule of
17
Evidence 403.
18
3.
CONCLUSION
19
20
thereof of his claims and prejudice the jury, this time with unsubstantiated and
21
22
23
other instances. Defendants respectfully submit that in its role as gate-keeper, the
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
8
Court should prohibit plaintiffs attempt to misuse a claim of expertise to get in, by
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
1.
the State of California. I have personal knowledge of the following facts and could
2.
Patrick Page, Robert Plant and John Paul Jones in this action. This Reply
10
11
12
13
3.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10
EXHIBIT 1
Get the Led Out: How Led Zeppelin Became the Biggest Band in the World by Denny
Somach
Led Zeppelins Catalogue of Songs
Various Songs Compared to Led Zeppelins Song, such as Dazed and Confused by Jake
Holmes, Babe Im Gonna Leave You by Anne Bredon, etc.
Wisdom from the Gods, John Bonham: Interview with Chris Welch, The Paul Green
School of Rock Magazine, Fall 2006, originally in Melody Maker, John and Jason
Bonham Issue, 1992.
Todd Brabec, American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers;
Cameron Crowe, The Durable Led Zeppelin, Rolling Stone, March 1975;
Led Zeppelin: The Complete Guide to Their Music, by Dave Lewis;
Nielsen Broadcast Data Systems and SoundScan;
Recording Industry Association of America;
Danny Strick, president, Sony/ATV Music Publishing;
Alan Wallis, executive director of valuation and business modeling, Ernst & Young
The case docket and filings
EXHIBIT 1
11
EXHIBIT 1
12
most protected pieces of music in history having never to my knowledge been licensed for
commercial use or having appeared in a commercial, movie, or television show.
The popularity of Stairway to Heaven propelled Led Zeppelin IV to sell almost 40
million albums, and, according to the RIAA website, it is the fourth best-selling album of all
time, and has gone platinum 23 times.
EXHIBIT 1
13
Conclusion:
Stairway to Heaven occupies a far more important spot in Led Zeppelins catalogue than
simply just another song. It was a bona fide cultural phenomenon that propelled Led Zeppelin to
previously unreachable levels of fame in the rock and roll world, and which led the song itself to
become the most played song in history, valued at over half a billion dollars. Stairway to Heaven
qualitative importance to Led Zeppelin and the history of rock music is perhaps greater than any
song in history. I also note that many Led Zeppelin songs, including Stairway to Heaven, have
been compared to songs by previous artists. I make no judgment as to whether those claims are
correct, except to note that credit has been changed on several Led Zeppelin songs, such as
Dazed and Confused, and that those comparisons are well known in the music, rock, and Led
Zeppelin fan communities.
I told these opinions with a reasonable degree of historical and professional certainty. I
reserve the right to amend or supplement this report as needed.
EXHIBIT 1
14