Laporan KPKw

ULBS BI SPM

LEMBAGA PEPERIKSAAN MALAYSIA

KEMENTERIAN PELAJARAN MALAYSIA

FORMAT PELAPORAN ULBS

BAHASA INGGERIS SPM
2016

LAPORAN KETUA PENTAKSIR SEKOLAH

BIL
.
1

NAMA SEKOLAH

NO. PUSAT

SMK XYZ

SN999

BILANGAN
CALON
179

NAMA KETUA PENTAKSIR SEKOLAH: BOBBY FLAY

1. PRESTASI KESELURUHAN CALON BERDASARKAN SKOR

NO. OF
CANDIDATES
AT EACH
CENTRE

1
179
2
3
4
GRAND
TOTAL

LEVEL

TOTAL

EXCELLENT

GOOD

SATISFACTORY

WEAK

VERY WEAK

26 30
3

21 25

16 20

11 15

5 10

21

73

58

24

179

21

73

58

24

179

Laporan KPKw

ULBS BI SPM

2. KOMEN TENTANG PENTAKSIRAN

2.1 Model: Models used by the candidates are suitable with the students needs and
ability. Suitability of the models for candidates are appropriate and useful in real
life communication.
2.2 Konstruk: At the end of the third assessment, students were more confident.
They were able to present their scripts with at least satisfactory performance.
They were more sure of the content of their presentation. Some students still
failed to give eye contact and appropriate non-verbal communication. The
students also make unnecessary occasional pauses during their presentation that
defected their performance. Some students were too shy. Therefore, hindered
their ability to present their points/ideas effectively.
Good candidates were able to present with appropriate tone and
intonation.
The weaker candidates tended to present with monotonous ton(reading intonation).
Some still have problem with pronunciation of consonant cluster and fricatives.
Fluency in pronunciation was affected/influenced by their mother tongue. The good
candidates were able to use wide range of vocabulary while weak candidates have
limited range of vocabulary. Most words used were of elementary level.
Only a small number of candidates were able to respond critically to
questions asked. Most of the candidates' response were on a superficial level.
Students failed to provide answers that should reflected critical and creative thinking.
Limited general knowledge has made it harder for students to give opinion. This
problem might arises because the students memorizes their text. They were conscious
and tried to avoid making mistakes, thus, limit their ability to think beyond the
required scope.
2.3 Kriteria Penskoran: The descriptors are too complicated for each score. Should
revise the criteria for assesssment or replace with banding.
3. SARANAN KEPADA CALON
Students should be given enough time and preparation for oral test.
4. SARANAN KEPADA GURU
The teachers have to juggle between finishing the syllabus and to evaluate students
according to the time limit. Thus, teachers should be given an isolate period for ULBS
assessment.
5. ISU DAN SARANAN PENAMBAHBAIKAN ULBS
Suggestions a list of themes and topics should be provided/given by the teachers

Laporan KPKw

ULBS BI SPM

6. HAL-HAL LAIN
In general the assessment methods and models are appropriate and cater to the students'
needs. Students have more freedom in choosing what they want to present and familiar
with. Thus they would be able to present effectively.
Laporan disediakan oleh :
_____________________
(BOBBY FLAY)
Ketua Pentaksir Sekolah
SMK XYZ
Tarikh : 15 APRIL 2016