如何快速阅读提高你的学习效率

--
.................................................................................... 2
........................................................................2
..................................................................2
...............................................................5
...........................................................................6
...........................................................................7
........................................................................7
..................................................................9
................................................................13
.............................................................15
................................................................16
.............................................................19
......................................................................20
......................................................25
.......................................25
.............................................................26
1................................................................................. 26
2....................................................................................... 27
3.......................................................................28
4............................................................................................. 28
.............................................................29
1............................................................................. 29
2..........................................................................29
3.................................................................................... 31
http://blog.sina.com.cn/koogoog
4............................................................................................. 32
5....................................................................................... 32
6............................................................................................. 33
.............................................................33
1............................................................................. 33
2.......................................................................34
......................................................................35
...................................................................37
30 /
1.
2.
3.
4.
19
1475
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
200-300 /
2000 /
10000 /
2.
3.
Rose of Cairo
I don't know anything about speedreading or

photoreading, but I'm a natural fast reader I guess. When I
was a teenager, I used to read one novel every evening.
I had never consciously thought about subvocalizing or

not, but now that you mention it, yes I don't subvocalize
when I read. I don't even hear the words as a voice in my
head. I don't know if it's good or bad, but I can assure you
that I understand what I read .
I also don't subvocalize when I think. It would slow me

down, as I can think much faster than I can speak. As a
result I often don't
know which logical path I followed to reach the conclusion
I reached.
1.
1.
4 5
30
2.
----
3.
speed reading
2.
wikipedia
In January 2000 Danielle S. McNamara submitted a
preliminary report to the NASA Ames Research Center on
photoreading. McNamara enrolled in a PhotoReading
workshop under the tutelage of a photoreading expert
trained by Paul Scheele. In three years this expert had
trained over 150 individuals in PhotoReading. The trainee
spent two months learning the PhotoReading technique.
The two participants were "(a) the PhotoReading trainee
who participated in a two-day photoreading
workshop, and (b) the expert who provided the

PhotoReading workshop." (McNamara 4).
2000 1
photoreading
photoreading .
150
photoreading photoreading
photoreading
ab
McNamara first conducted five baseline tests to measure
ordinary reading speeds and comprehension. Then, she
administered five similar tests after using the
PhotoReading technique. These tests included the Nelson
Reading Comprehension Test and the Verbal Reasoning
section of the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT). The
study investigated fact-based tests since "PhotoReading
has been claimed to be particularly effective for this type
of text" (McNamara 5). Subject matter included
physiology, perception, and biology. A single idea or

sentence within each text formed the basis for each
question. According to McNamara "The information in the
text that is targeted by the question generally requires
little prior knowledge and little active processing of the
text to understand" (McNamara 6). In other words, these
were relatively straightforward, factual questions.
5
photoreading 5

MCAT
PhotoReading
McNamara 5
McNamara 6
The results of the study generally indicate that

PhotoReading and normal reading require a similar
amount of time to complete. In one test, the expert
answered 37 of 38 questions correctly after normal
reading, and took 19.43 minutes to complete the task.
Then the expert took a similar test after PhotoReading the
passage, and answered 38 out of 38 questions correctly in
a time of 18.13 minutes. McNamara took the same test
and scored a 92%
both times; photoreading took 21.30 minutes whereas
regular reading took 15.80 minutes. These results do not
support Scheele's 25,000 words per minute claims.
photoreading

38 37 19.43
photoreading
18.13 38
92%; photoreading 21.30
15.80 25000
In a text about perception, the expert read normally and

finished the text in 8.82 minutes and answered three
questions of eight correctly. Then, the expert "photoread"
the text in 0.87 minutes and proceeded to read the text
for another 8.12 minutes before finishing. After
photoreading, the expert scored one out of eight questions
correctly. These results do not support Scheele's
assertions that Photoreading helps one study faster and
with greater comprehension than with ordinary reading
techniques.
8.82
8 8.82
8 0.87
8.12
photoreading 8
Photoreading
photoreading
In conclusion, McNamara noted that "In terms of words per

minute (wpm) spent reading, there was no difference
between normal reading (M = 114 wpm) and
PhotoReading (M=112 wpm)" (10). In an attempt to
explain the appeal of PhotoReading for some individuals,
McNamara stated "One aspect of the PhotoReading
technique is that it leaves the reader with a false sense of
confidence."
wpm
M = 114 wpm PhotoReadingM=112
wpm 10
PhotoReading
PhotoReading
3.
1.
1.
2.3.
2.
3.
4.
2.
:
500
5000
50
500
a,
b
b
b
I m
b
B m I
B
B
b
()
1,
2,
3,
1.
2 3
60-80%
2.
10-20%
3.
5%
4.

2%
5.
3d
1%
6.
1..
1.
2.
3.
1 100
1.
2.
moustache
mous(e)+ta(+che
3.
4.
1899 1966
1924

1930
[)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1 7 7
1()
1899
1966
1
(18)
()(99J(
)
()
(66)
2()
()
3(
(
)
4()
1924
(24)(
)()
()
5()
1930 h
(30 )()
(30 )()
6()
6
()
711 ()
71 81 11

71
72
73
74
75
76
77.
78
79
80
81
2.
3.
10
1. 2.
3.
1.
------
10
1.
2.
,
a
b
2.
---
20 30
5 10
3.
--------
4.
1 100
1. 2. 3.
4. 5. 6.
1.
-------
2.
-------
7,8
10
--------
---
3.
------
------
4.
--------
5.
-------
6.
--------
1. 2.
1.
10
--------
1-5
---
---
2.
5
7 7
2 3
-------
1.
2.
7

3.:
1.
2.
3.
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
6 1.03
1
1
2
3
http://www.sharebank.com.cn/link.php?
agentid=8901&softid=39126

如何快速阅读提高你的学习效率

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

如何快速阅读提高你的学习效率

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

--

I don't know anything about speedreading or

I had never consciously thought about subvocalizing or

I also don't subvocalize when I think. It would slow me

workshop, and (b) the expert who provided the

physiology, perception, and biology. A single idea or

The results of the study generally indicate that

In a text about perception, the expert read normally and

In conclusion, McNamara noted that "In terms of words per

You might also like