when I asked her to identify herself and explain why she was in my office. She responded with the exact same questions of me. I told her I was Judge Bernstein and room 530 City Hall has been my office for over five years. Since I was obviously discomforted by the conversation, Jenny, for that was the young ladys name, became very solicitous and offered me a seat on plush benches in the chambers anteroom to regain my composure while she would fetch Judge Bachmann, who was fortuitously still in his office. During the moments it took for Judge Bachmann to appear, I noticed that while the physical structure of the room was exactly as I had left it a few hours before, all the computers had been removed, and my pictures and
THE TRIALS OF A COMMON PLEAS JUDGE
decorations had been replaced by much more expensive
original lithographs, and an exquisite tapestry had been hung from the ceiling, which totally transformed the rectangular feel of the entire space. I had only begun to wonder whether I had somehow mistakenly gone to the third floor and to try to imagine which of our Judges had the resources and taste to so beautifully decorate such a chambers when Judge Bachmann appeared and asked if he could help me. I assured him that I hoped he could begin by explaining what had happened to and so dramatically transformed my office so quickly. He was completely taken back by the question and asked if I had identified myself as Judge Bernstein. I assured him that I was Judge Bernstein having been duly appointed and elected and in fact had served continuously, and, I might add, honorably, for over four years. Although apparently confused by my response, he ushered me into my very own office, which to my further surprise had been similarly redecorated in Victorian elegance. He invited me to sit down on the couch so that we could get to the bottom of this very peculiar situation, which equally intrigued us both. I found Judge Bachmann to be classically educated and most engaging. He inquired as to whether I knew that I was in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and asked for the history of how I became a Judge. Thinking back to this discussion I am sure that he believed I was one of those poor unfortunates whose delusional world placed himself into an exalted role that was fully believed to be true but had of course no
THE TRIALS OF A COMMON PLEAS JUDGE
existence beyond the four corners of a disturbed mind.
However, being of a mind ready to accept all evidence before judiciously reaching any conclusion, Judge Bachmann kindly allowed me to fully explain. My detailed explanation of how Governor Casey had empanelled lawyers across the state to present to him the most qualified individuals for appointment to a judiciary decimated by corruption intrigued him rather than convincing him that the medical authorities had to be called. I apparently also convinced him that, whatever my delusions, the depth of my knowledge and acuity of judicial thought demonstrated that something truly unusual had indeed occurred. I explained that I had practiced law in Philadelphia with offices at 16th and Walnut for over a decade doing primarily civil litigation and some criminal defense until the city experienced a horrendous situation where 16 judges had been thrown off the bench for taking the petty sum of $300 in gratuities from a labor union, and three or four had actually gone to jail because the gratuities could be connected to actual judicial decisions. In response the Governor had created merit selection panels which had recommended me among many others to judgeships, and that after confirmation by the Senate I took the bench on April 7th and was elected for a full ten year term the following November. I went on to explain that for three years I had presided over hundreds of criminal cases, many of which were bench trials, until I had most recently been moved to the courts civil division and was at that very time presiding
THE TRIALS OF A COMMON PLEAS JUDGE
in Courtroom 443 when I had left City Hall because of
the syncopatic episode that I have previously described. He stopped me at this point and said that I must be mistaken because I could not have been confirmed in April since the legislature, of which he had been a member for over a decade, routinely and uniformly meets only January to March before breaking for the summer. My quizzical look and taken aback demeanor undoubtedly conveyed such sense of shock that my listener thought perhaps he had misheard. He again asked when I had taken the bench, to which I replied with precision that I had been sworn in by the President Judge Bradley in room 578 City Hall on April 7, 1987, at 2:00 p.m. Imagine the shock I saw in Judge Bachmanns face as he slowly realized that I was fully in control of all my senses and not in any respect suffering any delusions. He went to his desk, picked up the evening Bulletin, and showed me the date on the masthead, which read July 3, 1913. I told him that of course this was impossible and the paper obviously a replica. But after some significant toing and froing we simultaneously came to the inevitable conclusion that somehow after my fall from my chair I had awakened 80 years earlier. Judge Bachmann suggested that while we figured out what was happening, since I was a fully commissioned judge I should be treated to all the emoluments of my office (which I must say I learned were significantly greater in 1913 than 1993) and most graciously offered that I was more than welcome to stay
THE TRIALS OF A COMMON PLEAS JUDGE
with him at his house in the Fairmount suburb of town
until a return to my proper era could be arranged. He graciously asked if I would wait so he could summon his President Judge, the Mayor, and the City Fathers to meet me. Believing that I needed time alone to sort out the amazing transformation I found myself in, I agreed but asked for something to drink while he was away. Although not my usual daytime habit I readily accepted the brandy he offered. He clearly had told his secretary Jennie ODonnell to check on me frequently, which she did with countless diplomatic excuses or offers of things she could provide. While alone in what had been my former office, or more precisely subsequently my previous office, I wondered in disbelief at the oddity of the situation. Yet in examining the appurtenances and appearances of the chambersthe pens, the paper, the casebooks, the newspaper articles, the pleadings, and the absence of any modern appliances except for the antique telephoneI became convinced that this was no Potemkin village. Indeed the appellate court reports, sitting on my shelves precisely as they had in 1993 when it had last been my office, ended with the July, 1913, decisions! Apparently I was not dreaming or under any delusion but had in fact performed a reverse Rip Van Winkle. Although this defied all scientific possibility I was forced to admit that the reality was I was in the different world of a time long passed and that until I found a way to restore myself I could only conduct myself in the manner my former law partner would
THE TRIALS OF A COMMON PLEAS JUDGE
frequently advise: when life hands you a lemon make
lemonade. I resolved to learn as much as I possibly could about 1913 and chuckled to myself as I unsuccessfully tried to recall for investment purposes when Xerox and IBM were incorporated and what industries were about to boom when World War would break out some few years hence. Unfortunately, these historical facts that suddenly became so important had never seemed worthy of note at any earlier time in my life, and except for looking for the invention of the commercial airline I found I had little investment knowledge of any use, even with this potential opportunity for easy riches. (I did think to note that if I was still in this predicament a decade later I must sell all my stocks before the great depression of 1927 or was it 1926?) WATCH FOR CHAPTER THREE JUNE 1, 2016