Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Steve Forster
April 22, 2016
ALGONQUIN
ECO-LODGE
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Executive Summary
Travis Bico and Steve Forster were retained by Robin Banerjee (property owner) on behalf of the
Algonquin Eco-Lodge to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the property located
at Latitude: 45.211N, Longitude: 78.121W, lot 34 concessions 3 and 4 in Hastings County near the
Halliburton County boundary (referred to hereafter as the site or the site property). The site
currently serves as an off grid tourist resort/destination on the border of the famed Algonquin Provincial
Park. This Phase I ESA is being conducted to provide an evaluation of known and potential
environmental issues at the site and surrounding areas based on its current state and previous history.
The activities included as part of the Phase I investigation include, a review of reasonably ascertainable
public records, a site visit/inspection, an interview of past and present property owners and an
evaluation of the collected information.
Following the evaluation of the historical information gathered and the observations made during the
site visit and interviews, no observable areas of environmental contamination at or surrounding the site
property were observed. However, several potential sources of environmental contamination were
identified to have been present at one point in the propertys history. The potential sources of
environmental contamination at or surrounding the subject property are:
A small above ground storage tank was observed on site. It was determined that the tank was
once used to hold fuel and is currently approximately half full with fuel oil. The tank had no
observable perforations and has remained untouched for a number of years. The risk level of
environmental impact to the site property was determined to be low, but it is recommended to
be properly decommissioned and removed.
Wastewater is managed on site using an open septic tank system. The septic tank is emptied
once a year to ensure no backup or leakage. Barring negligent maintenance practices, the risk
level of environmental impact to the site property was determined to be low.
Historical logging and hunting activity was documented to have taken place at one point in time
on the site property and in the surrounding area. It is difficult to determine the nature of the
environmental impact associated with these activities. Evidence of logging practices was
documented on site at the mouth of Mink Creek and the foundations from a demolished hunt
camp were observed on site. These activities took place decades ago, limiting the likelihood of
any present environmental contamination. The risk level of environmental impact to the site
property was determined to be low.
Based on the nature and timeline of these potential sources of environmental impact, there is an overall
low risk of environmental contamination at the site property or at the adjacent/surrounding land. No
further investigation to the site property is recommended or required.
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Property Information .............................................................................................................................. 1
1.1.1 Site Location ................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1.2 Adjacent/Surrounding Land Uses ................................................................................................ 1
1.1.3 Site Features and Uses ................................................................................................................. 1
1.1.4 Site Services ................................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Objective ............................................................................................................................................. 1
2.0 Scope of Work ......................................................................................................................................... 2
2.1 Background and Records Review ........................................................................................................ 2
2.2 Interviews............................................................................................................................................ 2
2.3 Site Visit............................................................................................................................................... 2
2.4 Evaluation of Information ................................................................................................................... 3
3.0 Qualifications of Assessors...................................................................................................................... 3
4.0 Records Review ....................................................................................................................................... 3
4.1 Phase I Study Area Determination ...................................................................................................... 3
4.2 Limitations........................................................................................................................................... 3
4.3 Aerial Photographs.............................................................................................................................. 3
4.4 Environmental Reports ....................................................................................................................... 3
4.5 First Developed ................................................................................................................................... 3
4.6 Fire Insurance Plans ............................................................................................................................ 3
4.7 Chain of Title ....................................................................................................................................... 4
4.8 Well Records ....................................................................................................................................... 4
4.9 Permits, Approvals and Regulatory Records ....................................................................................... 4
4.10 Survey Plan........................................................................................................................................ 4
4.11 Topography, Hydrology and Geology ............................................................................................... 4
4.11.1 Geology ...................................................................................................................................... 4
4.11.2 Topography ................................................................................................................................ 4
4.11.3 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................... 4
5.0 Site Visit................................................................................................................................................... 4
5.1 Property Use ....................................................................................................................................... 5
5.2 Limitations........................................................................................................................................... 5
5.3 Unidentified Substances ..................................................................................................................... 5
ii
iii
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Property Information
1.1.1 Site Location
The Algonquin Eco-Lodge, located at Moffat Pond, Algonquin Park, Ontario is currently run and owned
by Robin Banerjee. The remote property consists of a large lodging building located on the southern end
of the property, with a storage shed and outhouse to the west. The property also includes an additional
guest cabin and a deck housing a hot-tub and sauna to the northwest. Further east, water empties into
Mink Creek from Moffat pond, where a portion is diverted to operate the micro-hydroelectric generator,
which resides approximately 120m downstream from the rivers source. Directly north of the property,
approximately 10m from the main lodge, lay the remnants of three former building foundations.
1.2 Objective
The information gathered during the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) is intended to identify
any actual or potential environmental contamination at the site, or in the direct vicinity of the site,
which may be present as a result of current or historical activities. The subject area is known to have
been impacted from logging as early as the 1800s. Before the main lodge on the property was
constructed, the property housed a hunting camp that was lost in the early 1980s. A full Phase I ESA will
be conducted under CSA Standard Z768-01. The investigation aims:
To assess the potential likelihood that any type of contaminant(s) have affected any land or
water on the site
Provide historical documentation of any potential impacts that may have arisen over the past
and present use of the property
To determine the need and/or basis for carrying out a Phase II ESA
An enhanced investigation will not be needed as the property is not used for any means outlined in
Ontario Reg. 154/04 that require an enhanced investigation.
2.2 Interviews
Interviews will be conducted will the following people of interest:
Name
Company
Robin Banerjee
Algonquin Eco-Lodge
Mark Arbogast
N/A
Position
Property Owner & President
Former Owner
4.2 Limitations
Due to the remote location of the property, much of the historical past relies on records that may no
longer be present or contact information that could not be found. Furthermore, the lumber company,
Martin Bros., who logged in the area, are no longer in business, making access to the activities of their
operations and if they occurred on the Eco-Lodge property, difficult to conclude.
4.11.2 Topography
The topography of the site is relatively flat, consisting of small rocky hills with a general slope toward
Moffat Pond and Mink Creek. The relief of the property declines from 390m at the south end to 380m at
the north end approaching Moffat Pond. A topographic map of the property is presented in Appendix A.
4.11.3 Hydrology
Moffat Pond and Mink Creek, are located to the north and west ends of the site, respectively, and are
part of the Mink subwatershed. This subwatershed extends south from Endomink Lake, all the way to
Little Mink Lake, including all of Soaking Lake, McNab Lake, Goulais Lake, Robinson Lake, Big Mink Lake,
Mink Creek and Moffat Pond. The subwatershed is outlined in red in Figure 6 in Appendix A. Mink
subwatershed is included as part of the much larger Upper Madawaska Watershed.
Due to the remote location, groundwater data could not be found for the immediate property.
However, using nearby well depths an approximation was reached. Nearby wells include one on 3301
Elephant Lake Road with a well depth of 160 feet, located approximately 2km south of the Eco-Lodge
property. Also nearby, 3km east on Mcclure, concession 4, lot 27 resides a 260 foot well. Based off these
two nearby wells and the Eco-Lodge being located at a lower elevation than both locations, it is likely
the groundwater is less than 160 feet from the surface.
conditions. The checklist that was used for the site visit can be found in Appendix E. Site photographs
outlining locations of interest on the property can be found in Appendix B.
5.2 Limitations
Due to the site visit taking place in the late fall, the ground was littered with leaves from the deciduous
trees making any observations of staining and stressed vegetation difficult to ascertain. The focus of the
assessment was on the exterior of the property, therefore, interior observations throughout the visit
were not thoroughly noted.
5.6 Odours
There were no unusual or concerning odours present during the site visit.
5.9 Staining
No vegetative or soil staining was observed on the site at the time of the site visit.
5.11 Wells
A 10 foot deep pit well was dug behind the main lodge building to provide non-potable water for the
taps, toilets and showers. This water is non-potable and not intended for drinking.
5.17 Wastewater
Waste water is disposed through the septic system.
5.18 Roads/Parking
A 2.3km dirt road extends from a parking lot outside the property to the main lodge. At the entrance to
the main lodge there was a space for parking for the property owner, however, guests are prohibited
from parking at the lodge and must leave their vehicles outside the property.
6.0 Interviews
An email interview was conducted with Robin Banerjee on January 22nd and a reply was given on
January 23rd and February 10th, providing additional information specific to his ownership and operation
of the property. A copy of the interview transcript can be found in Appendix D. The interview revealed
the following information:
An email interview was also conducted with Mark Arbogast, the previous owner of the Algonquin EcoLodge on February 19th and a reply was given on February 22nd. A copy of the interview transcript can be
found in Appendix D. The interview revealed the following information:
7.0 Findings
Findings compiled from the records review, historical background search, interview and site visit
indicated that there is a very low potential of environmental impact on the property. Although, it is
likely that throughout the propertys history, the area was heavily logged and Moffat Pond was used as a
temporary checking area before logs were sent down Mink Creek. Any impacts would have been left in
the ponds sediment or soil, but because the area drains down into the pond and the pond drains out to
Little Mink Lake, any deposits from past logging activities are likely to have been washed downstream.
From the site visit, the majority of the property showed very little impact on the surrounding
environment. Aside from the buildings foundations, the piping for the hydroelectric generator and the
septic tank, no additional invasive structures existed on the property. An aboveground storage tank was
observed on site containing an unidentified oil. Although the tank is no longer in use, it was determined
that it once functioned as the primary fuel storing container for the lodge. The tank did not appear to
have any perforations, however, it is not known if any fuel leaked from past activities when the tank was
still used. A range of old building foundations were also found on the north side of the property, likely
from as far back as the early 1900s. The areas surrounding the grown over foundations showed no
evidence of vegetative strain, indicating that contamination of any significance is unlikely
The conducted interviews revealed, there appears to be no additional environmental impacts on the
property from any uses while the property was utilized for the Algonquin Eco-Lodge.
minimal impacts on the surrounding area. Since the property manages its own wastewater through the
septic system, the water quality of Moffat Pond, appears to be in good standings.
In the past, the property was likely used for logging and a hunting camp previously occupied the site
where the main lodge is now located.
9.0 Conclusions
Since ownership and operation by Robin Banerjee of the Algonquin Eco-Lodge, from 2003 to the
present, there has been little activity to cause contamination on the property. The property shows little
evidence of contamination and the need to follow through with a Phase II is not recommended. Little
information could be uncovered about the nature of the foundations on the property, therefore, the
activities that took place cannot be known for certain. The interview with Mark Arbogast revealed that
they likely housed a hunting or logging camp at some point in time. The only APEC identified is the fuel
oil storage tank next to the maintenance shed due to the uncertainty of its use in the past and any
incidents that may have leaked oil into the soil.
9.1 Recommendations
For the APEC identified, it is recommended that the storage tank be emptied and removed. Afterward,
preliminary testing of the soil be conducted to determine if any past contamination occurred and,
because of the small size of the area, it could be easily removed and replaced with fresh soil.
As for the area containing the building foundations, an archeological survey could be completed to
determine what activity may have taken place there and if any environmental impacts were created
from the activity. Any further actions could be determined after more information is found from the
survey.
It is also recommended that the water quality of Moffat Pond be sampled biannually to ensure
compliance with regulatory water quality guidelines, due to the close proximity of the septic system
drainage area.
10.0 References
Algonquin Provincial Park Aerial Photograph Archives (1969). Map 47. Strip no. 4509. Roll 69-8. Photo
no. 104-118/116. Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. Retrieved January 29, 2016.
Bedrock Geology of Ontario: Southern Sheet [map] (1991). Ministry of Northern Development and
Mines. Retrieved February 5, 2016, from:
http://www.geologyontario.mndmf.gov.on.ca/mndmfiles/pub/data/imaging/M2544/M2544.pdf
Crown Land Use Policy Atlas [map] (2015). Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. Retrieved
February 12, 2016, from: https://www.ontario.ca/page/crown-land-use-policy-atlas.
Make a Topographical Map [map] (2015). Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. Retrieved
February 12, 2016, from
http://www.giscoeapp.lrc.gov.on.ca/matm/Index.html?site=Make_A_Topographic_Map&viewer=MAT
M&locale=en-US.
Ontario Flow Assessment Tools III [website] (2015). Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry.
Accessed from: http://www.giscoeapp.lrc.gov.on.ca/web/mnr/wrip/ofat/Viewer/viewer.html.
ROCKLAND SERIES [website] (2007). Retrieved February 5, 2016, from:
https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/R/ROCKLAND.html.
11.0 Appendices
11.1 Appendix A: Aerial Photographs
Figure 1. Aerial photograph taken in 1969 of the study property and the surrounding area.
10
Figure 2. Aerial Photograph taken in 2009 of the study property and the surrounding area.
11
Figure 3. Aerial Photograph taken in 2012 of the study property and the surrounding area.
12
13
Micro-hydroelectric generator
14
Figure 4. Bedrock geology map of Ontario, presenting the bedrock type of the study site and the
surrounding area.
15
Figure 5. Topographical map presenting land elevations for the site property and the surrounding area.
16
Figure 6. Watershed map outlining the water flow of the Mink Lake Watershed.
17
19
Yes
No
N/A
Septic tank hooked up to the main building on the west side of the property.
Fuel storage tank (1200 gallons/4500L) northwest of the main building.
Six propane tanks identified on site.
Three foundations to the north of the main building.
A few stumps of logged trees present, but no drastic disturbances on property.
Drainage
Question
Are there any wetlands or water bodies present?
Do any streams or rivers run off the property?
Are any wells present?
Is drinking water provided from on-site sources?
Do any adjacent properties drain onto the site?
Are there reasons to suspect the quality of run off from adjacent properties
may carry contamination?
Notes:
Yes
No
N/A
20
Utilities:
Question
Does the power generating station contain any harmful chemicals?
Has any water been rerouted for the power generating station?
Is human waste dealt with on site?
Are there any signs of contamination near the utilities?
Are any transformers present?
Is there any gas lines or use on site?
Notes:
Yes
No
N/A
Water levels from Moffat pond were affected by the dam installation, but rerouted water for the
generator empties into the natural watercourse.
Septic system deals with human waste on-site until it requires emptying.
Transformers present to manage hydroelectric energy generated.
21
22
23
24