Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hartman,
Specificity. If I had to boil down my experience of designing this assignment into
one word, that would be it. How specific do I need to be in a handout for a semester
long project? How do I avoid overwhelming the student then? These were the
questions I struggled with early on, and after having actually assigned this, I have
similar questions. One of the key points of feedback on this assignment, both from you
and from Student Shana also had to do with specificity, in that the directions for the
text entry didnt talk about length, there was a complete lack of directions for the
reflective essay, and the assignment schedule in general caused confusion on when
these things would be addressed.
While Ive tried to revise my WAD to address all of these things, Ive also realized
that some things can only be done in the classroom, that is, some of the problems my
student reported likely would not have occurred if I was actually teaching this as
intended. For instance, a specific comment addressed what I meant by the exploiting
the affordances of multimodality, which is something I would have addressed if I had
been teaching this over the course of a semester, where I could have taken the time to
really dig into each modality in individual units, but when I had to condense it for this
assignment, I clearly made some mistakes that I honestly dont think I would have
otherwise.
Of course, thats not to say I didnt learn anything from that mistake, since it
certainly disabused me of any notions I had about how simple designing, assigning, and
assessing an assignment, particularly something as inherently open-ended and
creativity focused as a multimodal assignment, would be. Thats something Im happy
about, because the last thing I want is to go into the classroom (or writing center) that
unprepared. So if the goal of the WAD was to get us thinking about how assignments
work in the realm of the practical vs. the theoretical, then its safe to say that goal was
met. If only I could say that about all the goals of this assignment! Alas, onward and
upward.
Sincerely,
Amanda Shoaf
Amanda Shoaf
ENED 683
Dr. Shana Hartman
24 April 2016
Writing Assignment Design: Multimodal Writing (Phase 1)
Overview:
What is writing in 2016? This is a complex and thorny question, and so is the focus of
much research and scholarship in Rhetoric and Composition, which is why this
assignment isnt trying to answer it. However, we also cant ignore that the question is
being asked, or that multimodal and visual communication is fast becoming standard,
both in our personal and professional lives. Neither can we ignore the growing need for
collaborative writing skills in the marketplace. With that in mind, we must prepare our
students to communicate effectively in this environment, in well-organized, rhetorically
effective language and to think critically about the methods they are using.
That is the purpose of this assignment, a semester long, research-based composition
project culminating in the completion of a group wiki, utilizing three other modes besides
text. By immediately introducing college Freshmen to the idea of multimodal composing
and giving them practical skills in it, this assignment will allow students to move forward
into their chosen disciplines with an understanding of 21 st century communication.
Students will also learn to produce content collaboratively, on top of further developing
their craft.
Context:
Designed for a First Year Writing classroom that meets three times a week, this
assignment will be the culmination of a semesters worth of work, with individual
modules introducing and building the technical, critical thinking, and composition skills
needed to complete the group wiki. Groups will be randomly assigned by the end of the
first week of class, and each module will include low-stakes individual assignments that
allow for practice and self-assessment, in order to prevent problems only becoming
apparent at the end of the project. At the end of the semester, the groups will publish
their completed wiki entry and each individual group member will write a short essay
wherein they explain the rationale for their rhetorical choices.
Goals/Objectives/Standards:
*adapted in part from Gardner Webb Universitys Writing Program
Writing Program)
Integrate their own ideas with those of others (GWU Writing Program)
Learn to critique their own and others works (GWU Writing Program)
Learn to balance the advantages of relying on others with the responsibility of
doing their part (GWU Writing Program)
Program)
Understand and exploit the differences in the rhetorical strategies and in the
affordances available for both print and electronic composing processes and
Works Cited
Hartman, Shana. ENG 101: Composition I. Fall 2014. Department of English
Language and Literature, Gardner Webb University, Boiling Springs, NC. Adobe
PDF file. 19 Feb. 2016.
etc.) and begin their research. After topics are chosen, we will begin to build the
technological and rhetorical skills needed for this multimodal wiki entry. We will spend
time discussing the affordances of and working with images, video, and audio, with
each unit allowing for small stakes individual experimentation. You will collaborate with
your group, determining whether you wish to divide the entry into sections or work on
each section together, and during this time, peer feedback from your group members is
an essential element of the collaborative process. At the end of each unit groups will
also have the opportunity to comment on the level on group participation on their
respective entries in order to prevent any one member from neglecting their
responsibilities. Once your wikis are completed, we will publish them so that everyone
in the class has the chance to view them. Finally, once the wikis are published,
everyone will write a short essay reflecting on their groups rhetorical choices.
Purpose
As young adults in 2016, you all likely have already used multimodal communication in
your everyday life, even if you dont realize it. This group wiki is an introduction of sorts,
teaching you to think critically about that intuitive communication and why and how you
communicate visually, spatially, and aurally. Its also about helping you recognize and
develop the rhetorical strategies of non-textual communication so that you can compose
thoughtful, coherent, and well-developed multimodal projects in the future, both inside
and outside of academia. There are many ways to write besides putting black words on
white paper, and I want to show you that with this project.
Requirements
Groups are free to choose whatever topic they want, but it should allow for a
Notes
Choose something your passionate about! Youre going to be spending a lot of time on
this project, so choose a topic youre actually interested in, not one you think I want to
read.
Due Dates
Week 1: Groups are randomly assigned on Friday
Week 2: Discuss the parameters of the reflective essay (introduce rhetorical concepts
and language)
Week 3: Continue discussing some fundamental rhetorical concepts; Final group topics
should be submitted by Friday
Week 4: Begin Image Module
Week 5: First surveys on group participation due
Week 6: Begin Video Module
Week 7: Second surveys on group participation due
Week 8: Begin Audio Module
Week 9: Third surveys on group participation due
Week 10: Begin Text Module
Week 11: Fourth surveys on group participation due
Week 13: Draft of wikis due
Week 14: Feedbacks given on drafts; review of MLA citation rules
Week 15: Group wikis due; will be shared in class on Friday
Week 16: Reflection essay due
Rubric
Project Requirements
Exceeds
Meets
Meets Some
Expectation
Expectation
Expectation
Expectations
s (4 pts)
s (3 pts)
s (2 pts)
(1 pts)
Reflection shows an
understanding of rhetorical
concepts and uses the
language learned in the
course.
Use conventions of format and
structure appropriate to the rhetorical
situation (GWU Writing Program)
Understand and exploit the differences
in the rhetorical strategies and in the
affordances available for both print and
electronic composing processes and
texts (GWU Writing Program)
First, I'll reiterate (even though it's in the description) that this is open
topic. You can choose any issue, place, person, etc. to research and
write about so long as you develop a cogent thesis
In order to modify this for one "student" over a shorter period, I'd like
you to concentrate on completing just one section of the wiki, which is
likely what you would do if you were working on this with a group.
In that one section I'd like to see evidence of two modes: text and one
other that is not linguistic based, i.e. images, video, audio clips.
Choose whichever you are most comfortable with since the in-class
work designed to build up the practical skills necessary are not possible
in this format.
Also, instead of the 3-5 sources required, use 2-3. These sources
should be cited in accordance with MLA guidelines.
Resources:
Help:Contents - Community
Central - Wikia
community.wikia.com
Getting Started Where& how to get started
on Wikia Contributing How to contribute
and format content
http://www.youtube.com/DaviesMediaDe
sign This ...
Purpose
As young adults in 2016, you all likely have already used multimodal communication in
your everyday life, even if you dont realize it. This group wiki is an introduction of sorts,
teaching you to think critically about that intuitive communication and why and how you
communicate visually, spatially, and aurally. Its also about helping you recognize and
develop the rhetorical strategies of non-textual communication so that you can compose
thoughtful, coherent, and well-developed multimodal projects in the future, both inside
and outside of academia. There are many ways to write besides putting black words on
white paper, and I want to show you that with this project.
Requirements
Groups are free to choose whatever topic they want, but it should allow for a
Notes
Choose something your passionate about! Youre going to be spending a lot of time on
this project, so choose a topic youre actually interested in, not one you think I want to
read.
Completed Assignment (Student Shanas work):
Amanda,
As requested, I am submitting my one section of the wiki, with two modestext
and a video
My Wiki
site: http://goodfoodforthinking.wikia.com/wiki/Goodfoodforthinking_Wi
kia
Attached is my reflective essay
Here were some questions I had (acting as student right now so you get that
perspective)
1. Which part of the Word attachment was I, as student, supposed to focus on?
I concentrated on the part that said Introduction to the end of the document.
Hope that was ok.
2. I appreciated all of the links at the end of the email with instructions, but I
was a bit overwhelmed on where to begin. I thought maybe you would launch
the wiki for me or have some clearer steps on what to do first (ex. set up the
wiki space first? pick the topic? start my research?)
3. Finding sources was a bit of a struggle, so I chose not to worry too much
about that right now for what I am submitting to you. I put a placeholder in to
note that I needed to go back and work on this. I understand that this will affect
my grade.
4. I also procrastinated and thus didnt submit as much as I wanted to have
done by March 18 due date
Reflective Essay:
Shana Hartman
3/18/16
Multimodal Wiki
Composition 101
Rubric
Project Requirements
Exceeds
Meets
Meets Some
Expectation
Expectation
Expectations
Expectations (1
s (4 pts)
s (3 pts)
(2 pts)
pts)
The wiki
exhibits
knowledge of
a mode of
communicatio
Writing Program)
n besides text,
but fails to
integrate it
fully or exploit
the
affordances of
multimodality.
This was
done alone,
single entry
as expected,
so this metric
is not
applicable.
by and large,
conforms to
these rules,
but because
the text entry
is unfinished,
to the degree
that it ends
mid-sentence,
I cannot say
that it meets
all the
expectations
of this
assignment or
the
corresponding
writing level.
All 3-5 resources are cited
There are no
standards
is a problem
of a copyrighted
video. The use of
open source Pixabay
is noted however, as
was the use of at
least two sources.
Reflection shows an
understanding of rhetorical
wanted to comment on
regarding understanding
differences in rhetorical
strategies. Largely, your