Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • When Development Charges

    Uploaded by

    Dhaval Gohel
    37 views1 page
    The Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court, consisting of Justices K.L. Manjunath and V. Suri Appa Rao, held in the case of M Muninarayana Swamy vs State Of Karnataka that when property situated within a Town Municipal Council area has had development charges collected and a construction plan granted by the Town Municipal Council, it loses its agricultural character. Therefore, the Deputy Commissioner does not have the right to cancel the property record (khata) on the grounds that the appellants did not obtain an order converting the land use from agricultural to non-agricultural.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court, consisting of Justices K.L. Manjunath and V. Suri Appa Rao, held in the case of M Muninarayana Swamy vs State Of Karnataka that when property situated within a Town Municipal Council area has had development charges collected and a construction plan granted by the Town Municipal Council, it loses its agricultural character. Therefore, the Deputy Commissioner does not have the right to cancel the property record (khata) on the grounds that the appellants did not obtain an order converting the land use from agricultural to non-agricultural.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    37 views1 page

    When Development Charges

    Uploaded by

    Dhaval Gohel
    The Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court, consisting of Justices K.L. Manjunath and V. Suri Appa Rao, held in the case of M Muninarayana Swamy vs State Of Karnataka that when property situated within a Town Municipal Council area has had development charges collected and a construction plan granted by the Town Municipal Council, it loses its agricultural character. Therefore, the Deputy Commissioner does not have the right to cancel the property record (khata) on the grounds that the appellants did not obtain an order converting the land use from agricultural to non-agricultural.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    DIVISION BENCH OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT consisting of THE HON'BLE

    MR.JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.SURI APPA RAO in the
    case of M Muninarayana Swamy, vs State Of Karnataka reported in ILR 2012 KAR
    3428, held that .. when the property situated within the Town Municipal
    Council area when Town Municipal Council has collected development charges from
    the appellants and granted plan for construction of the compound and in the
    planning area if it has lost the character of agriculture, the Dy. Commissioner will
    not get any right to cancel the khata on the ground that the appellants have not
    obtained an order of conversion. Therefore, we are of the opinion that
    there is no necessity for the appellants to obtain conversion from agriculture to nonagriculture, if the area comes within the Town Municipal council limits and in the
    background of Town Municipal Council collecting the developmental charges and
    treated as Municipal property.

    You might also like