Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter deals with the economical and safe design of the common types of shallow
foundations. The main foundation types that are considered here are: isolated or spread
footings, combined footings, strap or cantilever footings and mat or raft foundations.
Shallow foundations are structural members that are used to transfer safely to the
ground the dead load of the superstructure and all external forces acting upon it. The type
and magnitude of the loading will usually be furnished by the engineer design the
superstructure. It is up to the foundation engineer to collect all the information regarding the
purpose of the superstructure, the material that will be used in its construction, its sensitivity
to settlements in general and to differential settlement in particular and all other pertinent
information that may influence the successful selection and execution of the foundation
design. The foundation engineer should also select the soil stratum that most suitable for the
support of the superstructure.
The design of shallow foundations is based on the assumption that they are rigid so that
the variation of pressure under the foundations will be linear. The distribution of pressure will
be uniform if the centroid of the foundation coincides with the resultant of the applied loads.
The requirements in design of foundations are:
1. The pressure on the soil should not exceed the bearing capacity of the soil.
2. The settlement of the structure should be within the permissible limits. Further
there should be no differential settlement.
In order to proportion shallow foundations one should either know the presumptive
allowable soil pressure as dictated by prevalent code or know the appropriate strength
parameters of the soil, i.e., the angle of internal friction,f , and cohesion, C.
Foundation Engineering
Description Compactness**
Presumed
Ground
or
Design Bearing
Type
Consistency***
Resistance
Remarks
(kPa)
Massively crystalline igneous and
Hard and
sound
basalt, gneiss)
Rocks
5600
Medium hard
schist)
and sound
Medium hard
and sound
2800
These
2800
values are
based on the
Soft
1400
limestone)
assumptions
that the
foundations
Soft shale
Soft
850
are carried
down to
unweathered
Decomposed rock to be
rock
Non-
Dense
560
Width of
cohesive
Medium dense
420
foundation
soils
Loose
280
Foundation Engineering
Sand
Dense
420
Medium dense
280
Ground
Loose
140
water level
assumed to
be depth not
less than B
below the
base of the
foundation.
Cohesive
Silt
soils
Clay
Hard
280
Stiff
200
Medium stiff
140
Soft
70
Hard
420
Stiff
280
Medium stiff
140
Soft
70
Very soft
Not applicable
* The given design bearing values do not include the effect of the depth of embedment
of the foundation.
** Compactness: dense: N> 30
medium dense: N is 10 to 30
loose: N< 10, where N is standard penetration value
*** Consistency: hard: q
stiff: q
u
u
medium stiff q
soft: q
> 400kPa
= 100 to 200kPa
u
= 50 to 100kPa
= 25 to 50 kPa, where q
Foundation Engineering
f and c.
For cases where presumptive allowable soil pressures cannot be used, one should
determine the soil strength parameters f and c. These parameters may be approximated or
determined from laboratory tests. Using the value of f and c thus obtained, one can easily
determine the area of the foundation in question using bearing capacity equations.
In applying the bearing capacity equations one should differentiate two states of loading,
namely, the initial or instantaneous loading condition
condition.
In the initial loading condition, the load is assumed to act instantaneously. At this stage
the pore water pressure in the soil does not have time to dissipate. This situation
corresponds to the quick or undrained test condition of the triaxial test. The soil parameters
are designated by f
and c
- in most cases f
= 0.
In the final or long-term loading condition, the load is assumed to act gradually as
construction progresses thus giving the pore water pressure in the soil ample time to
dissipate. Here the situation corresponds to the slow or drained test condition of the triaxial
test. The soil parameters in this case are designated by f and c.
The ultimate load that may be applied on a foundation with sides
aand bmay be
(3.1)
a' = a-2
ea = effective length
b' = b-2
e b = effective width
and e
The actual sustained load on the footing may be related to the ultimate load
Vult =Fs* P
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3.2)
Foundation Engineering
b
b
a
a
ea
eb
Fs *P = A' s
ult -----------------------------------------------------------------
(3.3)
Fs * P
A' =
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(3.4)
ult
From Eqn. (3.4) one easily determines the required area since all the quantities on the
right hand side of the equation are known.
The ultimate bearing capacity,
s ult
= CN c S c d c ic + b
N S d i+qN
Where
q
ult
C = Cohesion,
q = Effective surcharge at the base level of the footing.
= effective unit weight of soil
N
c, N q, N
c,
c ,d q ,
S q ,S = Shape factors
c, i q ,
d = Depth factors
i , = Inclination factors
S q d q iq
------------------
(3.5)
Foundation Engineering
straight lines and an arc of a circle. The bearing capacity coefficient would have the values
Nc =5.14, Nq= 1.0, N
(3.6)
Before going into the structural design, one should check if the settlement of the selected
foundation is within the prescribed safe limits. If the settlement exceeds the safe limits, one
should incr ease the dimensions of the foundations until the danger of settlement is
eliminated.
The last stage in the design of foundations is the structural design. The structural design
process for reinforced concrete foundations include:
Selecting a concrete with an appropriate strength
Selecting an appropriate grade of reinforcing steel
Determining the required foundation thickness
Determining the size, number and spacing of the reinforcing bars
Designing the connection between the super structure and the foundation
up
where
= 0.25 fctd k1 k2 u d
= ( 1+50
(MN)
e ) = 2.0
For members where more than 50% of the bottom reinforcement is curtailed , k
d=
ex
d x + dy
2
+.=
ey
0.015
Vu d = 0.25 fctd k1 k2 b
(MN)
=1
Foundation Engineering
where
k
K
= ( 1+50
2
) = 2.0
As
bw d
ld =
f f yd
f yk
f yd =
f ctd =
(cm)
4 f bd
; f bd = fctd
0.35 f ck
c
Where
A
bd
ck
ctd
yd
yk
=1
Foundation Engineering
i) Punching shear
normal practice to provide adequate depth to sustain the shear stress developed without
reinforcement. The critical section that is to be considered is indicated in Fig. 3.2
Foundation Engineering
b +3d
a +3d
a
Critical
section
P
Critical
section
1.5d 1.5d
d
Average soil
pressure,s
b
Section A-A
Fig. 3.2 Critical section for punching shear
From the figure it is apparent the concrete shear resistance along the perimeter
according to EBCS2 would be
2( a +3d + b+ 3d) dV
up
(3.7)
{}
()()
a * b - []
a'+3d
+
b' 3d s
ult
From equilibrium consideration, Eqn. (3.7) and Eqn. (3.8) should be equal
2( a +3d + b+ 3d) dV
up
{a }* b
[(a])('++)3 d
b ' 3d
ult
(3.8)
Foundation Engineering
10
()
up
up
up
up
up
up
ult
+ 3b'ds
+ 9d2 s
ult
ult
= ()
ab- a'b' s
ult
ul t
2a' dVup + 2b' dVup + 12d 2 Vup + 9d 2 s ult + 3a' d s ult + 3b' d s ult = ()
ab - a' b' s ult
d (2a'V + 2b'V + 3a's
up
up
d2 (12V + 9s
up
ul t
d 2 (12V + 9s
up
d2 (12V + 9s
up
ult
ult
+ 3b's
ult
) + d 2 (12V + 9s
up
)+ d(2V (a'+b') + 3s
ul t
up
) + d(2V + 3s
up
) + d(2V + 3s
up
ult
ult
ult
ult
) = ()
ab - a'b' s
(a'+b')) = ()
ab - a'b' s
)(a'+b') = (A )
footing
- A
column
ult
ult
ult
ult
(3.9)
For square columns a = b and round colmns with diameter a, Eqn. (3.9) would be
d2 (12V + 9)s
up
ult
) + d (2V + 3s
up
ult
)(2a' = (A )
footing
- A
column
ult
(3.10)
In the above equations, all quantities with the exception of d are known. By solving one
of the equations the effective depth necessary to sustain the punching shear may be
determined.
Foundation Engineering
11
b
D D
B
C
d
a
d
Critical
section
C
P
Critical
section
d d
d
Average soil
pressure,s
b
Section B-B
Fig. 3.3 Critical section for diagonal tension
The shear forces are calculated along the plane C-C and D-D
s ult
(3.11)
s ult
(3.12)
C-C
D-D
VC - C
ad
VD- D
.
bd
These calculated actual shear stresses should be compared with diagonal shear
resistance.
(3.13)
(3.14)
Foundation Engineering
12
Critical sections
varies according
to the type of
column as given
in a,b and c
b
Column
Concrete
Column
a)
Critical
section
d
b
ld
Available
embedment length
Foundation Engineering
13
Masonry
column
b)
Critical
section
d
X x/2
ld
Available
embedment length
Steel
column
Base plate
X
c)
x/2
Critical
section
d
ld
b
Fig. 3.4 Critical sections for moments
Available
embedment length
Flexural Reinforcement
1. Distribution: In one-way footings and two-way square footings,
reinforcement shall be distributed uniformly across the entire width of
footing.
2. In two-way rectangular footings, reinforcement shall be distributed as
follows:
a) Reinforcement in long direction shall be distributed uniformly across the entire width
of footing
b) For reinforcement in the short direction, a portion of the total reinforcement given by
Eqn.(3.15) shall be distributed uniformly ov er a band width ( centered on center line
of column or pedestal) equal to the length of the short side of footing. The reminder of
the reinforcement required in the short direction shall be distributed uniformly out side
the center band width of the footing.
Foundation Engineering
14
+1
ld =
f f yd
4 fbd
(3.15)
Foundation Engineering
15
Examples
3.1 Determine the dimensions of a square footing necessary to sustain an axial column
load of 850kN as shown in Fig. below, if
a) an allowable presumptive bearing pressure of 150kN/m
b) C u = 40 kN/m 2 ; C = 7.5 kN/m
; f =22.5
is used.
P=850kN
= 19.1kN/m
2m
GWL
B
Solution
a) Using presumptive value
A=
as
850
= 5.67 m 2 = B
150
= 5.14C u S c dc ic + q S q dq iq
Shape factors
= 1.2 , S
c
Depth factors
=1
Foundation Engineering
d
16
= (1+0.4(2/B)) , d
=1
=1
,i q=1
Hence
s ult = 5.14*40 *1.2*(1+0.8/B)*1+ 19.1*2*1**1*1 = (244.8+195.84/B +38.2)
A s
ult
= P Fs
A=
253 B
P * Fs
ult
2 +195.84B
850 * 2
=
= B2
253 + 195.84 / B
1700 = 0
s ult
= CN c S c dc ic + B
N S d i + q N q S q dq iq
= 6.82, N q = 8.23
Shape factors
S
= 1+(N q / N c )=1.47 , S = 0.6 ,
c
Sq = 1+ tan f= 1.41
Depth factors
d
= 1+ 0.4 (2 / B)=1+0.8/B, d = 1, d
(Df / B) =1+0.63/B
= 1 , iq = 1
Hence
= 7.5*17.45*1.47*(1+0.8/B)*1+ B *9.1* 6.82* 0.6*1*1 + 19.1*2*8.23*
ult
ult
= P* Fs
Foundation Engineering
2
P * Fs
B =
18.62*B
ult
3+
17
850 * 2
635 .67 + 433.18 + 18.62B
B
()
635.67*B
+ 433.18*B = 1700
From the above the dimension of the footing would be 1.35m X1.35m
3.2 Given R.C. column size 30X50 cm with 4f22.
P = 1500kN
M = 375 kN-m
Ultimate soil bearing pressure = 400kPa
f
yk
ctk
= 1.5 MPa,
P
M
l2
b
30
50
l1
Foundation Engineering
18
Solution
Size of footing
Let l1 = l 2
a - 50
Then
Eccentricity, e
b - 30
a - b = 50 - 30 = 20cm = 0.2 m
2
P
375 =
1500
0.25m
Contact pressure
P
M
s min
s
max
400 =
P+
1
A
6e
s max
P +
1
ab
6e
1500
6 * 0.25
1+
()()
0.2 + b b
0.2 + b
2550
()
0.2 + b
Foundation Engineering
19
s
s
max
min
1500 + 6 * 0.25
2
s
()2.6()2.4 1 2.6 = 379.07kN / m < ult
1500 6 * 0.25
1
= 101.70kN / m2 > 0
()()
()
2.6 2.4
2.6
ok
ok
min
= 0.5/f
yk
= ( 1+50
) = (1 +50*0.0017) =1.085
up =
101.70kN/m
1.5d
1.5d 0.45m
379.07kN/m
s1
s2
Foundation Engineering
20
s = 101.7 +
1
Net shear force developed = 1500 612.98 = 887.02 kN > Vup not ok !
Since the developed shear force is greater than the punching shear resistance, one may
increase the depth.
min
= 0.5/f
yk
= ( 1+50
) = (1 +50*0.0017) =1.085
up
101.70kN/m
1.5d
1.5d 0.375m
379.07kN/m
s1
s2
Foundation Engineering
s = 101.7 +
1
21
= 141 .71kN / m2
2.60
2.225 * (379.07 - 101.7)
s = 101 .7 +
= 339.07kN / m2
2
2.60
s +s
339.07 + 141 .71
2 *1.85 =
s = 1
*1.85 = 444.72 kN / m
2
2
V = 444.72 *1.65 = 733 .79kN
Net shear force developed = 1500 733.79 = 766.21 kN < Vup ok !
The depth satisfies the punching shear requirement for the assumed
min
101.7kN/m
379.07kN/m
s = 101 .7 +
s =
1
+s
max
s
2
()
379 .07 - 101 .7 (1.55 + 0.45 )
2.60
()
1.05 -
d =
+379.07
315.06
2
= 315 .06kN / m2
0.6 = 208.24kN / m
Foundation Engineering
22
Since the developed shear force is greater than the wide beam shear resistance, one
may increase the depth
Take d = 0.60m
Contact stress at distance d from the face of the column, s
s = 101 .7
++
()379.07 -
101.7 (1.55
0.60
2.60
s = 331 .06 kN / m2
+s max
()
1.05 -
d =
+379.07 331.06
0.45
2
= 159.78kN / m
Developed wide beam shear
Vd = 159.78 *2.4 =383.47kN
Wide beam shear resistance
V
=
f k kb d
u d 0.25 ctd 1 2 w
(MN)
= 0.25*1*1.085*1*2.4*0.60 =0.3906MN =390.60kN > Vd ok !
Bending Moment
M
1.35m
1.05m
101.70kN/m
379.07kN/m
s2
s1
Foundation Engineering
s = 101.70 +
s =
23
= 267 .06 N / m2
+ 2
M = s
(1 .05)
1 3
s (
2
1.05
) b
2
+() () 2
58.81 (1.05 )
3
M =
280 .41 (
1.05
2
) 1 = 188 .38kN - m / m
M = 0.32 * fcd * bd 2
Calculation of reinforcement
Long direction
fcd 1f
2M
fcd bd 2
yd
11 .33
1260 .87
As =
1-
2 * 188 .38
11 .33 10 3 * 1.0 * ()
0.6
use f 16
spacing =
Use f 16c/c16cm
16 cm
= 0.0021 >
min
Foundation Engineering
24
Short direction
1.15m
0.85m
s
s
s avg =
s
avg
M = s1(
2
2
M =
cd
fyd
1-
min
1 .05
) 1 = 126 . 21 kN - m / m
2
2M
f bd 2
cd
11.33
1260.87
As =
= 240.39kN / m2
1 .05
) a
2
240 .39 (
s max + s min
379.07 + 101.7
1-
2 *126 .21
11.33 103 * 1.0 * ()
0.584
= 0.0014 <
spacing =
Use f16c/c20cm
20.2cm
min
Foundation Engineering
25
Development length
f f
l =
yd
4f
bd
yd
; fbd = fctd
yk
s
ctd
0 .=35
ck
l =
d
f f
yd
4 =f
bd
0. 35
20
1 .5
1MPa
104 .35cm
ldavailable = 100cm < ld , bend the bars upward with a minimum length of 10cm
X
B
c.g
L
L
Foundation Engineering
26
a a
a+d/2
a+d
L
d) Design procedure
i) determine length of footing (L) in such a way that the center of gravity(c.g.)of
footing area coincides that of the c.g. of loads
i.e., L = 2x
ii) determine the width of footing(B) such that the allowable soil pressure is not
exceeded
i.e.,
B=
P
Ls all
iii) determine and draw shear force and bending moment diagrams along the
length of the footing
iv) calculate depth of footing
v) calculate steel reinforcement for bending moment requirement
Foundation Engineering
27
c.g
B1
B2
L
L
A=
A=
s all
+ B1
B2
ii) the c.g. of footing are coincides that of column loads. The
distance to the c.g. of trapezoidal footing x is calculated from
X '=
L 2B2 + B1
3 B2 + B1
2) determine and draw shear force and bending moment diagrams along the
length of the footing. In this case, the shear force and bending moment diagrams
are 2 nd degree and 3
rd
Foundation Engineering
28
a1
b1
a2
Strap
b
a
P1
XC
WS
XS
a1
a2
s a2
sa1
a/2
e
b2
XR
R2
R1
a/2
1. a) Assume a
e=
a1 - a'
2
e = XC - X R
b) Determine the magnitude of the soil reaction force by taking moments about R
R1 = 1P
Xc
XR
+ Ws
Xs
XR
Foundation Engineering
29
In this equation the weight of the strap, Ws, may be neglected if the strap is relatively
short.
c) Determine the reaction R
R2 = P1 + P2 + Ws - R1
2. Determine sizes of footings using known v alues of R
b1 =
R1
s a1 * a1
b2 =
R2
s *a
a2
2
b2 = a2 =
2
R2
s a2
, R2 and s
all
).
It should be noted that the actual bearing pressures under the footings should not very
different from each other in order to minimize differential settlement.
3. Determine and draw shear force and bending moment diagrams along the length of
the footings.
4. Select depths of footings for shear requirement.
5. Select steel reinforcement for bending requirement.
6. In short direction, the footings analyzed as spread footing subject to uniform soil
pressure.
7. Design strap as flexural member for the shear and moment obtained above.
Foundation Engineering
30
Design Procedure
i) Determine the line of action of the resultant of all the loads acting on the mat
ii) Determine the contact pressure distribution as under
a) If the resultant passes through the center of gravity of the mat, the contact
pressure is given by
s =
Q
A
Qe
Q Qex
x y y
A Iyy
Ixx
The maximum contact pressure should be less than the allowable soil pressure
c) Divide the slab mat into strips in x and y directions. Each strip is assumed to
act as independent beam subjected to the contact pressure and the columns
loads.
d) Determine the modified column loads
e) Draw the sheer force and bending moment diagrams for each strip.
f) Select depth of mat for shear requirement
g) Select steel reinforcement for moment requirement
Y
ex
ey