Professional Documents
Culture Documents
We would like to thank Rachael Winterling for visiting our class. She supplied us
with useful background information and helped us to do appropriate user tests. Our
task was assigned to us by Associate English Professor Dr. Gregory Wickliff as part of
our class ENGL 4181, Writing User Documents. Our goal was to analyze the usability of
the Atkins/ WorldCat Local interface by observing the successes and difficulties of
UNCC students searching the system for texts.
The findings presented in our report reveal that UNCC students did have success
in using the interface, but there are many areas that caused frustration that could be
approved upon. We suggest with certain modifications World Cat can make the
interface easier to maneuver in for new and non-frequent users. The following are the
issues that most users came upon while using the interface.
Filter function in navigation bar is cumbersome
Icon choice for source citation in ambiguous
Text overloading made finding information difficult
We feel that finding a solution for these obstacles will make a more simplistic
experience for users.
Sincerely,
Michael Berthold & Chris Huff
Authors
Submitted to:
Gregory Wickliff, Assoc. Professor of English
Executive Summary
Our class this semester English 4181 Writing User documents performed a series of user test
on the functionality of the WorldCat Discovery beta site.
ii
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
ii
Key findings
Appendices
A: User Test Observations
B: User Test Comments
C: User Time Completion
6
6
7
Introduction
For a few semesters now, the J.
Murrey Atkins Library has been using a
unique search feature for finding scholastic
material called WorldCat Beta local. This
search engine is designed to allow students
and faculty to look up reference material,
much like a Google search engine interface,
but without erroneous information being
included. The librarys focus was to allow for
quick retrieval of information without the
cumbersome Google search query.
After the third party search feature
was introduced, a number of users, including
faculty and students, were conducting
usability tests to report and problems with
the interface. These problems included
anything from trying to find major bugs to
logical format errors introduced by the
system. According to our English 4181
professor, Dr. Gregory Wickliff, previous
usability test results were submitted to the
WorldCat Discovery creators, only to find
they were amazed how the tests resulted in
confusion or difficulty navigating parts of the
interface.
This semesters 4181 English class
provides a continuation of the usability tests
to either reaffirm previous findings, or even
find new problems that students and faculty
reveal with the additional testing. A total of
five students, four undergraduates and one
graduate student participated in our usability
study and provided beneficial feedback of
their experience. This test and its results
Once the tests were completed, each
tester was asked what they would do to
improve the navigation of the site, or any
Methodology
The users were recruited mainly
through word of mouth communication or
through email contact. The usability test
was conducted by two students: Chris
Huff and Michael Berthold. Since our
group was small, we had to take on dual
roles when performing the tests, usually
by being a reader and note taker at the
same time, as an example.
The test duration was designed to
last anywhere from five to seven minutes.
We concluded that our testing questions
should take anywhere from a minute or
less, with room forgiven extra time in
case the user was still deciding how to
complete the instructions. The testing
was performed on our own laptops that
used a webcam to record user facial
expressions and also to provide screen
capture for recording their interface
navigation. We also expressed, as a final
disclaimer, to each tester that we would
not provide any help for showing them
how to complete a task. Instead, we
provided clarity to the question or would
ask them their thought process along the
way if we discovered they looked
stumped.
Key Findings
1. Problematic Interface Issues: Filter
function in navigation bar is
cumbersome
Task Duration
User 1
User 2
User3
User 4
User 5
8 Min 5 Sec
8 Min 3 Sec
7 Min 25 Sec
6 min 15 sec
7 Min 5 Sec
Number of
Times user
asked for
assistance in
locating task
User
Demographic
Masters
Student
English
Expressions
Allot of
frustrated look in understanding
movement to
interface
lean in closer to
the screen
Number of
Times
moderator
asked if the
user needed
assistance
Undergraduate
Sophomore
Computer Science
Undergraduate
Senior
Computer Science
Undergraduate
Senior
Computer Science
Undergraduate
Junior
Biology
Frustrated appearance
during task 3
emotionless
Task 2
Task 3
User 1
User became frustrated User completed task but became frustrated in not being able to locate the
with deflecting each
citation function. User said the image on the button does not represent the
book category because functionality of it so it was confusing
the page website
wanted to load
overtime an item was
deselected
User 2
User became frustrated User said that the location to cite the books was not in the best place. He
because when trying to stated that the button where the citation link was located had no visual
select a certain type of imagery of the functionality of it
book in the categories
list is was annoying that
there was not a deselect all button
User 3
User 4
User 5
References:
Usability Test Participants: