Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To:
Subject:
Date:
Sec Lepore: can you please describe the idea we discussed last evening?
Sec Ash: I do not know anything about EDIC. Is this City only, or is it empowered by the State? I have the same
question about the BRA or any similar municipal development authority. Is there something that we should be
proposing more broadly?
Sent from my iPhone
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Future
Owner
Massport,
with
Massport
Board vote
required.
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
$120m in initial
lease value
support
Additional
lease value
opportunities
possible with
Massport, as
building size,
lease terms are
developed.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
could be
included in
$25m of
additional
State
infrastructure
funding.
Public
ownership
allows for
maximum
State energy
efficiency
grant.
City tax relief
of up to $20m
or more
depending on
size of the
property and
employment
commitments.
Permitting is straight
forward working with
City/State for more time
certainty to the
development.
Building size, floor plates
and layout can be right-sized
for the end tenant, including
future growth.
A new building can
accommodate parking and
other specific needs.
Massport is an experienced
developer who can fully
access other public
supports.
Especially A-2 can be
developed with only one
tenant; private vacant
parcels may require multitenants.
New building will likely allow
for maximum energy and
operating efficiency.
Direct access to public
transportation and
convenient public garage.
New building will likely allow
for maximum energy
efficiency installations.
Future
Owner
Private
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
Up to ~$50m
(Mass Life
Science
Center),
subject to a
board vote.
Already constructed
building.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
could be
included up to
~$25m of
additional
State
infrastructure
funding.
Note: With
existing
building the
offsite
improvements
may be limited.
Future
Owner
Massport,
with
Massport
Board vote
required.
Assumption
here is that
Massport is
able to
acquire the
property.
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
$120m in initial
lease value
support
Already constructed
building.
Additional
lease value
opportunities
possible with
Massport, as
building size,
lease terms are
developed.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
could be
included up to
~$25m of
additional
State
infrastructure
funding.
Note: With
existing
building the
offsite
improvements
may be limited.
Future
Owner
Private
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
Up to ~$50m
(Mass Life
Science Center)
Note: Subject
to a board
vote.
May be able to
select a higher
desired location.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
could be
included in
$25m of
additional
State
infrastructure
funding.
City tax relief
of up to $20m
or more
depending on
size of the
property and
employment
commitments.
Future
Owner
Massport,
with
Massport
vote
required.
Assumption
here is that
Massport is
able to buy
the property.
A lease of the
property
would
reduce the
ability for
lease
concessions
to be made.
Public
partners
would be
willing to
creatively
discuss
building/land
swap with
current
owners,
although this
option is
speculative
at this time
without the
participation
of the
current
owner.
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
$120m in initial
lease value
support
May be able to
select a higher
desired location.
Additional
lease value
opportunities
possible with
Massport, as
building size,
lease terms are
developed.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
could be
included in
$25m of
additional
State
infrastructure
funding.
Public
ownership
allows for
maximum
State energy
efficiency
grant.
City tax relief
of up to $20m
or more
depending on
size of the
property and
employment
commitments.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
It's not my idea but something that might be raised with us. It is essentially a new job refundable tax credit where
the state would forgive withholding taxes for newly created jobs. Perhaps establishing the threshold for
withholdings above $100,000 was the example given.
-----Original Message----From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 9:30 AM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF); Povich, Lon (GOV); Frazier, Ricks
(EOHED)
Subject: Econ ideas
Sec Lepore: can you please describe the idea we discussed last evening?
Sec Ash: I do not know anything about EDIC. Is this City only, or is it empowered by the State? I have the same
question about the BRA or any similar municipal development authority. Is there something that we should be
proposing more broadly?
Sent from my iPhone
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
On EDICs - several communities have them. They are created from state statute. Here's a link for more info:
http://www.mass.gov/hed/community/planning/economic-development-industrial-corporations.html
________________________________________
From: Lepore, Kristen (ANF)
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 10:39 AM
To: Kadish, Steven (GOV); Ash, Jay (EOHED); Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF); Povich, Lon (GOV); Frazier, Ricks
(EOHED)
Subject: RE: Econ ideas
It's not my idea but something that might be raised with us. It is essentially a new job refundable tax credit where
the state would forgive withholding taxes for newly created jobs. Perhaps establishing the threshold for
withholdings above $100,000 was the example given.
-----Original Message----From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 9:30 AM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF); Povich, Lon (GOV); Frazier, Ricks
(EOHED)
Subject: Econ ideas
Sec Lepore: can you please describe the idea we discussed last evening?
Sec Ash: I do not know anything about EDIC. Is this City only, or is it empowered by the State? I have the same
question about the BRA or any similar municipal development authority. Is there something that we should be
proposing more broadly?
Sent from my iPhone
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
John Barros
Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Ash, Jay (EOHED); Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Frazier, Ricks (EOHED); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Sullivan, Jennifer
F. (ANF); Tom Glynn; Morse, Elizabeth; jdoolin@massport.com; Pollack, Stephanie (DOT); Garrity, Rob (DOT);
Povich, Lon (GOV); Zarrella, Lily (GOV)
Re: Renderings of Approved Developments in the Seaport
Sunday, December 13, 2015 12:58:03 PM
Project Plum - South Boston Waterfront One Pager.pdf
This is a much small document. I will send the higher resolution document to Jay.
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 12:22 PM, John Barros <john.barros@boston.gov> wrote:
Here is a copy of the map and renderings of buildings that have been approved to be built in
the Seaport.
-John Barros
Chief of Economic Development
Office of Mayor Martin J. Walsh
6th Floor, Room 603
Boston City Hall, Boston MA 02201
t: 617-635-5729
http://www.cityofboston.gov
SHARE YOUR VISION. SHAPE OUR CITY.
http://imagine.boston.gov/
-John Barros
Chief of Economic Development
Office of Mayor Martin J. Walsh
6th Floor, Room 603
Boston City Hall, Boston MA 02201
t: 617-635-5729
http://www.cityofboston.gov
SHARE YOUR VISION. SHAPE OUR CITY.
http://imagine.boston.gov/
$1M
ANNUAL GLOBAL
STARTUP COMPETITION
AND ACCELERATOR BY
MASSCHALLENGE
1,000+
PROJECT PLUM
900,000
SEPTEMBER 2015
35,000
NEW JOBS
CREATED IN 2014
SERVED BY MBTA
SILVER LINE
1.1M SF
BOARD APPROVED
PROJECTS IN 2014
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS
PARCEL A HOTEL
2
3
50 LIBERTY RESIDENTIAL
MOAKLEY
FEDERAL
COURHOUSE
ICA
FISH
FISH
PIER
PIER
SEAPORT WORLD
TRADE CENTER
BLUE HILLS
BANK PAVILION
DISTRICT
HALL
SEAPORT
HOTEL
PIER 4 RESIDENTIAL
BOSTON
CHILDRENS
MUSEUM
PARCEL H
PARCEL A-2
6
7
8
BCEC
LAWN
ON D
10
Existing Buildings
Recently Completed
Under Construction
Under Review
In the Pipeline
Planned Buildings
10
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
John Barros
Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Ash, Jay (EOHED); Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Frazier, Ricks (EOHED); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Sullivan, Jennifer
F. (ANF); Tom Glynn; Morse, Elizabeth; jdoolin@massport.com; Pollack, Stephanie (DOT); Garrity, Rob (DOT);
Povich, Lon (GOV); Zarrella, Lily (GOV)
Re: Renderings of Approved Developments in the Seaport
Sunday, December 13, 2015 12:58:05 PM
Project Plum - South Boston Waterfront One Pager.pdf
This is a much small document. I will send the higher resolution document to Jay.
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 12:22 PM, John Barros <john.barros@boston.gov> wrote:
Here is a copy of the map and renderings of buildings that have been approved to be built in
the Seaport.
-John Barros
Chief of Economic Development
Office of Mayor Martin J. Walsh
6th Floor, Room 603
Boston City Hall, Boston MA 02201
t: 617-635-5729
http://www.cityofboston.gov
SHARE YOUR VISION. SHAPE OUR CITY.
http://imagine.boston.gov/
-John Barros
Chief of Economic Development
Office of Mayor Martin J. Walsh
6th Floor, Room 603
Boston City Hall, Boston MA 02201
t: 617-635-5729
http://www.cityofboston.gov
SHARE YOUR VISION. SHAPE OUR CITY.
http://imagine.boston.gov/
$1M
ANNUAL GLOBAL
STARTUP COMPETITION
AND ACCELERATOR BY
MASSCHALLENGE
1,000+
PROJECT PLUM
900,000
SEPTEMBER 2015
35,000
NEW JOBS
CREATED IN 2014
SERVED BY MBTA
SILVER LINE
1.1M SF
BOARD APPROVED
PROJECTS IN 2014
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS
PARCEL A HOTEL
2
3
50 LIBERTY RESIDENTIAL
MOAKLEY
FEDERAL
COURHOUSE
ICA
FISH
FISH
PIER
PIER
SEAPORT WORLD
TRADE CENTER
BLUE HILLS
BANK PAVILION
DISTRICT
HALL
SEAPORT
HOTEL
PIER 4 RESIDENTIAL
BOSTON
CHILDRENS
MUSEUM
PARCEL H
PARCEL A-2
6
7
8
BCEC
LAWN
ON D
10
Existing Buildings
Recently Completed
Under Construction
Under Review
In the Pipeline
Planned Buildings
10
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Jay - FYI.
________________________________________
From: Mcgaugh, James (GE Corporate) [james.mcgaugh@ge.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 11:05 AM
To: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED)
Subject: Thanks!
Mike--thanks for hanging in there on this project. I think we're almost
there... Jim
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Michael.kennealy@MassMail.State.MA.US
Mike Kennealy
Fwd: Renderings of Approved Developments in the Seaport
Sunday, December 13, 2015 1:44:41 PM
Project Plum - South Boston Waterfront One Pager.pdf
ATT00001.htm
Mike Kennealy
Begin forwarded message:
From: "John Barros" <john.barros@boston.gov>
To: "Kadish, Steven (GOV)" <steven.kadish@MassMail.State.MA.US>
Cc: "Ash, Jay (EOHED)" <jay.ash@MassMail.State.MA.US>, "Kennealy,
Michael (EOHED)" <Michael.kennealy@MassMail.State.MA.US>, "Frazier,
Ricks (EOHED)" <ricks.frazier@MassMail.State.MA.US>, "Lepore, Kristen
(ANF)" <kristen.lepore@MassMail.State.MA.US>, "Sullivan, Jennifer F.
(ANF)" <Jennifer.F.Sullivan@MassMail.State.MA.US>, "Tom Glynn"
<tglynn@massport.com>, "Morse, Elizabeth" <EMorse@massport.com>,
"jdoolin@massport.com" <jdoolin@massport.com>, "Pollack, Stephanie (DOT)"
<stephanie.pollack@dot.state.ma.us>, "Garrity, Rob (DOT)"
<rob.garrity@dot.state.ma.us>, "Povich, Lon (GOV)"
<lon.povich@MassMail.State.MA.US>, "Zarrella, Lily (GOV)"
<lily.zarrella@MassMail.State.MA.US>
Subject: Re: Renderings of Approved Developments in the Seaport
This is a much small document. I will send the higher resolution document to
Jay.
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 12:22 PM, John Barros <john.barros@boston.gov>
wrote:
Here is a copy of the map and renderings of buildings that have been approved
to be built in the Seaport.
-John Barros
Chief of Economic Development
Office of Mayor Martin J. Walsh
6th Floor, Room 603
Boston City Hall, Boston MA 02201
t: 617-635-5729
http://www.cityofboston.gov
SHARE YOUR VISION. SHAPE OUR CITY.
http://imagine.boston.gov/
-John Barros
Chief of Economic Development
Office of Mayor Martin J. Walsh
6th Floor, Room 603
Boston City Hall, Boston MA 02201
t: 617-635-5729
http://www.cityofboston.gov
SHARE YOUR VISION. SHAPE OUR CITY.
http://imagine.boston.gov/
$1M
ANNUAL GLOBAL
STARTUP COMPETITION
AND ACCELERATOR BY
MASSCHALLENGE
1,000+
PROJECT PLUM
900,000
SEPTEMBER 2015
35,000
NEW JOBS
CREATED IN 2014
SERVED BY MBTA
SILVER LINE
1.1M SF
BOARD APPROVED
PROJECTS IN 2014
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS
PARCEL A HOTEL
2
3
50 LIBERTY RESIDENTIAL
MOAKLEY
FEDERAL
COURHOUSE
ICA
FISH
FISH
PIER
PIER
SEAPORT WORLD
TRADE CENTER
BLUE HILLS
BANK PAVILION
DISTRICT
HALL
SEAPORT
HOTEL
PIER 4 RESIDENTIAL
BOSTON
CHILDRENS
MUSEUM
PARCEL H
PARCEL A-2
6
7
8
BCEC
LAWN
ON D
10
Existing Buildings
Recently Completed
Under Construction
Under Review
In the Pipeline
Planned Buildings
10
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
MEMORANDUM
TO:
GE Team
FROM: Secretary Jay Ash, Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
DATE: December 13, 2015
RE:
Thank you for the continuing discussion about the tremendous possibility the City of Bostons
Innovation District provides for locating your future project. Our public partners, including the
Governor and our team, the Mayor of Boston and his team, and quasi-public partners like
Massport, continue to examine the range of ways we may best support your project. As I hope
you can continue to sense, we are excited about the possibilities and, therefore, continue to
refine our best thinking to provide you additional clarity for you to best complete your own
review. We do stand at the ready to entertain any option you wish to pursue, and will continue
to treat each comment or question with our most urgent and well-reasoned response.
In particular, we have spent considerable time over the past forty-eight hours examining five
potential scenarios. Three are developed in the attached Options Grid, while the discussion on
the final two has ended without inclusion in the grid. In this latter case, while some have
suggested that perhaps a public acquisition of a private property could be an alternative, our
combined efforts have not been able to identify a path for a city or state entity to either acquire
an existing privately owned office building or acquire privately owned land and then build an
office building. That is not to say we are not willing to explore any additional ideas you may
have regarding those possibilities; it is only meant to say that a clear path does not exist
presently and, therefore, we cannot model it for timelessness of your occupancy and overall
cost. Should you chose that option, though, we are committed to further discussions and
would benefit from having the owner of the property you select at the table as well.
Regarding the three fully developed options attached, you will see that Option A, the public
option, provides for the maximization of public incentives and, we believe, certainty of time. In
each of the three scenarios, we are presenting to you the likely direct benefits for the property
development; all other previous made pledges, i.e. a $1 million workforce training grant,
remain intact. In Option A, I would also note that additional benefits are achievable in
negotiation with Massport at a time when many of the variables around the project are known.
Again, Massport remains committed to working with you on favorable lease terms over and
above those that accrue as a result of the $120 million initial lease support.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option
A public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No publicly supported additional lease concessions;
A City property tax level which is based only on the improvements then made to the
existing building, thus likely resulting in a significantly reduced benefit;
Up to $25 million in State support infrastructure, although an existing building may not
be able to maximize this benefit;
As much State energy efficiency funding as is available and possible for an existing
building, based upon an energy audit, and
The possibility of the availability of parking public should the building be proximate to
the garage Massport is building, or if another location exists for the construction of
another public parking garage.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option
A public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No publicly supported additional lease concessions;
Up to $20 million or more of City property tax relief, as the new construction of the
building will create ample new property tax to then be relieved;
$25 million in State offsite infrastructure and/or public transit improvements, which
could include bringing public utilities to the site and building-out the public sidewalks
around the building;
All members of our team remain available to discuss these matters with you in greater detail.
We look forward to continuing to work with you on this project and the additional aspects of
your companys interest in Massachusetts.
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
MEMORANDUM
TO:
GE Team
FROM: Secretary Jay Ash, Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
DATE: December 13, 2015
RE:
Thank you for the continuing discussion about the tremendous possibility the City of Bostons
Innovation District provides for locating your future project. Our public partners, including the
Governor and our team, the Mayor of Boston and his team, and quasi-public partners like
Massport, continue to examine the range of ways we may best support your project. As I hope
you can continue to sense, we are excited about the possibilities and, therefore, continue to
refine our best thinking to provide you additional clarity for you to best complete your own
review. We do stand at the ready to entertain any option you wish to pursue, and will continue
to treat each comment or question with our most urgent and well-reasoned response.
In particular, we have spent considerable time over the past forty-eight hours examining five
potential scenarios. Three are developed in the attached Options Grid, while the discussion on
the final two has ended without inclusion in the grid. In this latter case, while some have
suggested that perhaps a public acquisition of a private property could be an alternative, our
combined efforts have not been able to identify a path for a city or state entity to either acquire
an existing privately owned office building or acquire privately owned land and then build an
office building. That is not to say we are not willing to explore any additional ideas you may
have regarding those possibilities; it is only meant to say that a clear path does not exist
presently and, therefore, we cannot model it for timelessness of your occupancy and overall
cost. Should you chose that option, though, we are committed to further discussions and
would benefit from having the owner of the property you select at the table as well.
Regarding the three fully developed options attached, you will see that Option A, the public
option, provides for the maximization of public incentives and, we believe, certainty of time. In
each of the three scenarios, we are presenting to you the likely direct benefits for the property
development; all other previous made pledges, i.e. a $1 million workforce training grant,
remain intact. In Option A, I would also note that additional benefits are achievable in
negotiation with Massport at a time when many of the variables around the project are known.
Again, Massport remains committed to working with you on favorable lease terms over and
above those that accrue as a result of the $120 million initial lease support.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option
A public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No publicly supported additional lease concessions;
A City property tax level which is based only on the improvements then made to the
existing building, thus likely resulting in a significantly reduced benefit;
Up to $25 million in State support infrastructure, although an existing building may not
be able to maximize this benefit;
As much State energy efficiency funding as is available and possible for an existing
building, based upon an energy audit, and
The possibility of the availability of parking public should the building be proximate to
the garage Massport is building, or if another location exists for the construction of
another public parking garage.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option
A public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No publicly supported additional lease concessions;
Up to $20 million or more of City property tax relief, as the new construction of the
building will create ample new property tax to then be relieved;
$25 million in State offsite infrastructure and/or public transit improvements, which
could include bringing public utilities to the site and building-out the public sidewalks
around the building;
All members of our team remain available to discuss these matters with you in greater detail.
We look forward to continuing to work with you on this project and the additional aspects of
your companys interest in Massachusetts.
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
What are you using for the $40M in employment tax benefits?
-----Original Message----From: Ash, Jay (SEA) [mailto:jay.ash@massmail.state.ma.us]
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 4:24 PM
To: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Kadish, Steven (GOV); Lepore, Kristen
(ANF); Povich, Lon (GOV); Frazier, Ricks (EOHED)
Cc: Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF)
Subject: FW: GE Memo 2
Second time with proper email - no change to memo
________________________________________
Feedback? Thought I should include a summary of the benefits, but could
easily take it out.
Memo would be accompanied by just 3 options - the two involving Massport
acquiring public land were eliminated as you can see in the memo.
Comments by 5 please.
Thx
Jay
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Notice that Options 3 and 5 are withdrawn, and Options are now lettered for our clarification purposes.
Future
Owner
Massport,
with
Massport
Board vote
required.
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
$120m in initial
lease value
support
Additional
lease value
opportunities
possible with
Massport, as
building size,
lease terms are
developed.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
could be
included in
$25m of
additional
State
infrastructure
funding.
Public
ownership
allows for
maximum
State energy
efficiency
grant.
City tax relief
of up to $20m
or more
depending on
size of the
property and
employment
commitments.
Adjacent public
parking
availability.
Permitting is straight
forward working with
City/State for more time
certainty to the
development.
Building size, floor plates
and layout can be right-sized
for the end tenant, including
future growth.
A new building can
accommodate parking and
other specific needs.
Massport is an experienced
developer who can fully
access other public
supports.
Especially A-2 can be
developed with only one
tenant; private vacant
parcels may require multitenants.
New building will likely allow
for maximum energy and
operating efficiency.
Direct access to public
transportation and
convenient, adjacent public
garage.
Future
Owner
Private
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
Up to ~$40m
(Mass Life
Science
Center),
subject to a
board vote.
Already constructed
building.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
could be
included up to
~$25m of
additional
State
infrastructure
funding.
Note: With
existing
building the
offsite
improvements
may be limited.
Future
Owner
Private
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
Up to ~$40m
(Mass Life
Science Center)
Note: Subject
to a board
vote.
May be able to
select a higher
desired location.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
and bringing
public utilities
to the site
could be
included in
$25m of
additional
State
infrastructure
funding.
City tax relief
of up to $20m
or more
depending on
size of the
property and
employment
commitments.
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Thx
Jay
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Got it - thx
________________________________________
From: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED)
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 4:56 PM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED); Kadish, Steven (GOV); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Povich, Lon (GOV); Frazier, Ricks
(EOHED)
Cc: Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF)
Subject: RE: GE Memo 2
Jay, I think this looks great - just a couple of thoughts:
- Typo with "timelessness of your occupancy"; should be "timeliness"?
- Maybe a bit more color on what we did over the last 48 hours - extensive discussions between City and State,
exhausted all alternatives with quasis (Massport, MassDevelopment, BRA), thorough evaluation of bond cap issues,
thorough examination of statutes, etc. Those aren't the right words, but I think it would be great if they concluded
that we did a ton of homework (and we did) on this because (a) it shows respect for their request and strong interest
in the project and (b) at the end of the day it really demonstrates that the Massport parcels are the best options for
them.
Mike
________________________________________
From: Ash, Jay (SEA) [jay.ash@massmail.state.ma.us]
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 4:24 PM
To: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Kadish, Steven (GOV); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Povich, Lon (GOV); Frazier,
Ricks (EOHED)
Cc: Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF)
Subject: FW: GE Memo 2
Second time with proper email - no change to memo
________________________________________
Feedback? Thought I should include a summary of the benefits, but could easily take it out.
Memo would be accompanied by just 3 options - the two involving Massport acquiring public land were eliminated
as you can see in the memo.
Comments by 5 please.
Thx
Jay
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Jay,
Please use a more matter of fact tone. It is a little too gushy.
I do like Mike's suggestion about describing what we have done--gathered our
legal and financial teams, etc.
I would not use the term 'lease concessions', as we do not know what is
accurate, but the language that Massport has signed off on in the chart.
I would phrase the purchase of existing private property/building, or
property swaps as a legal/technical challenge that we believe would require
more time to determine how to possibly overcome.
Please use the same structure of the salutation of the memo that Mike has
been using.
Another draft?!
Thx.
Steve
>
> Mike
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Ash, Jay (SEA) [jay.ash@massmail.state.ma.us]
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 4:24 PM
> To: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Kadish, Steven (GOV); Lepore, Kristen
> (ANF); Povich, Lon (GOV); Frazier, Ricks (EOHED)
> Cc: Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF)
> Subject: FW: GE Memo 2
>
> Second time with proper email - no change to memo
> ________________________________________
>
> Feedback? Thought I should include a summary of the benefits, but could
> easily take it out.
>
> Memo would be accompanied by just 3 options - the two involving Massport
> acquiring public land were eliminated as you can see in the memo.
>
> Comments by 5 please.
>
> Thx
>
> Jay
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Jay,
Please use a more matter of fact tone. It is a little too gushy.
I do like Mike's suggestion about describing what we have done--gathered our legal and financial teams, etc.
I would not use the term 'lease concessions', as we do not know what is accurate, but the language that Massport has
signed off on in the chart.
I would phrase the purchase of existing private property/building, or property swaps as a legal/technical challenge
that we believe would require more time to determine how to possibly overcome.
Please use the same structure of the salutation of the memo that Mike has been using.
Another draft?!
Thx.
Steve
> To: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Kadish, Steven (GOV); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Povich, Lon (GOV); Frazier,
Ricks (EOHED)
> Cc: Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF)
> Subject: FW: GE Memo 2
>
> Second time with proper email - no change to memo
> ________________________________________
>
> Feedback? Thought I should include a summary of the benefits, but could easily take it out.
>
> Memo would be accompanied by just 3 options - the two involving Massport acquiring public land were
eliminated as you can see in the memo.
>
> Comments by 5 please.
>
> Thx
>
> Jay
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
on it w all comments
________________________________________
From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 5:25 PM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED)
Cc: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Povich, Lon (GOV); Frazier, Ricks (EOHED); Sullivan,
Jennifer F. (ANF)
Subject: Re: GE Memo 2
Jay,
Please use a more matter of fact tone. It is a little too gushy.
I do like Mike's suggestion about describing what we have done--gathered our legal and financial teams, etc.
I would not use the term 'lease concessions', as we do not know what is accurate, but the language that Massport has
signed off on in the chart.
I would phrase the purchase of existing private property/building, or property swaps as a legal/technical challenge
that we believe would require more time to determine how to possibly overcome.
Please use the same structure of the salutation of the memo that Mike has been using.
Another draft?!
Thx.
Steve
that we did a ton of homework (and we did) on this because (a) it shows respect for their request and strong interest
in the project and (b) at the end of the day it really demonstrates that the Massport parcels are the best options for
them.
>
> Mike
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Ash, Jay (SEA) [jay.ash@massmail.state.ma.us]
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 4:24 PM
> To: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Kadish, Steven (GOV); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Povich, Lon (GOV); Frazier,
Ricks (EOHED)
> Cc: Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF)
> Subject: FW: GE Memo 2
>
> Second time with proper email - no change to memo
> ________________________________________
>
> Feedback? Thought I should include a summary of the benefits, but could easily take it out.
>
> Memo would be accompanied by just 3 options - the two involving Massport acquiring public land were
eliminated as you can see in the memo.
>
> Comments by 5 please.
>
> Thx
>
> Jay
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
With Lon's changes and others incorporated. I'll dig up the salutation
structure now.
Love (whops, too gushy)
Somewhat sincerely,
Jay
________________________________________
From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 5:25 PM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED)
Cc: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Povich, Lon (GOV);
Frazier, Ricks (EOHED); Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF)
Subject: Re: GE Memo 2
Jay,
Please use a more matter of fact tone. It is a little too gushy.
I do like Mike's suggestion about describing what we have done--gathered our
legal and financial teams, etc.
I would not use the term 'lease concessions', as we do not know what is
accurate, but the language that Massport has signed off on in the chart.
I would phrase the purchase of existing private property/building, or
property swaps as a legal/technical challenge that we believe would require
more time to determine how to possibly overcome.
Please use the same structure of the salutation of the memo that Mike has
been using.
Another draft?!
Thx.
Steve
> To: Ash, Jay (EOHED); Kadish, Steven (GOV); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Povich,
> Lon (GOV); Frazier, Ricks (EOHED)
> Cc: Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF)
> Subject: RE: GE Memo 2
>
> Jay, I think this looks great - just a couple of thoughts:
>
> - Typo with "timelessness of your occupancy"; should be "timeliness"?
>
> - Maybe a bit more color on what we did over the last 48 hours - extensive
> discussions between City and State, exhausted all alternatives with quasis
> (Massport, MassDevelopment, BRA), thorough evaluation of bond cap issues,
> thorough examination of statutes, etc. Those aren't the right words, but
> I think it would be great if they concluded that we did a ton of homework
> (and we did) on this because (a) it shows respect for their request and
> strong interest in the project and (b) at the end of the day it really
> demonstrates that the Massport parcels are the best options for them.
>
> Mike
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Ash, Jay (SEA) [jay.ash@massmail.state.ma.us]
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 4:24 PM
> To: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Kadish, Steven (GOV); Lepore, Kristen
> (ANF); Povich, Lon (GOV); Frazier, Ricks (EOHED)
> Cc: Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF)
> Subject: FW: GE Memo 2
>
> Second time with proper email - no change to memo
> ________________________________________
>
> Feedback? Thought I should include a summary of the benefits, but could
> easily take it out.
>
> Memo would be accompanied by just 3 options - the two involving Massport
> acquiring public land were eliminated as you can see in the memo.
>
> Comments by 5 please.
>
> Thx
>
> Jay
MEMORANDUM
TO:
GE Team
FROM: Secretary Jay Ash, Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
DATE: December 13, 2015
RE:
Thank you for continuing our discussion about the exciting possibilities that the City of Bostons
Innovation District provides for locating your headquarters. Our public partners, including the
Governor of Massachusetts, the Mayor of Boston and their teams, as well as our quasi-public
partners including Massport, continue to examine the range of ways we may best support your
move to the Seaport District.
As I hope you can continue to sense, we are excited about the possibilities and, therefore,
continue to refine our best thinking to provide additional clarity so you may best complete your
own review. In particular, we have spent considerable time over the past forty-eight hours in
extensive discussions between the public partners and their legal and financial teams, have
considered and exhausted extensive alternatives, examined options allow through statutes and
even consulted with bond counsel on potential sources of public supports. We started with five
potential scenarios you suggested on Friday. Three options are developed in the attached
Options Grid, while the discussion on two others has ended without inclusion in the grid. In
these two cases, involving the public acquisition of a building or land that is currently privately
owned, our combined efforts have not been able to identify a path for a city or state entity to
overcome the identify legal/technical challenges to do so. While we are willing to explore any
additional ideas you may have regarding those possibilities, a clear path for those options does
not exist presently and, therefore, we cannot model it for timeliness of your occupancy and
overall cost. Regarding the three fully developed options attached, you will see that Option A,
the public option, provides for the maximization of public incentives and, we believe, certainty
of time. In each of the three scenarios, we are presenting to you the likely direct benefits for
the property development; all other previous made pledges, i.e. a $1 million workforce training
grant, remain intact. In Option A, I would also note we believe additional benefits are
achievable in negotiation with Massport once the many variables of the project are known.
Again, Massport remains committed to working with you on favorable lease terms over and
above those that accrue as a result of the $120 million initial lease support.
In order to provide additional perspective on Option A, I am also attaching a general description
of the neighborhood, as well as renderings which you may already have.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option
A public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No additional publicly supported lease value opportunities;
A City property tax level which is based only on the improvements then made to the
existing building, thus likely resulting in a significantly reduced benefit;
Up to $25 million in State support infrastructure, although an existing building may not
be able to maximize this benefit;
As much State energy efficiency funding as is available and possible for an existing
building, based upon an energy audit, and
The possibility of making additional parking available should the building be proximate
to the garage Massport is building or if another location can be permitted for another
public parking garage.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option
A public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No additional publicly supported lease value opportunities;
Up to $20 million or more of City property tax relief, as the new construction of the
building will create ample new property tax to then be relieved;
$25 million in State offsite infrastructure and/or public transit improvements, which
could include bringing public utilities to the site and building-out the public sidewalks
around the building;
Maximum State energy efficiency contributions, to be determined in conjunction with
project design, and
The possibility of making additional parking available should the property be proximate
to the garage Massport is building or if another location can be permitted for another
public parking garage.
All members of our team remain available to discuss these matters with you in greater detail.
We look forward to continuing to work with you on this project and the additional aspects of
your companys interest in Massachusetts.
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
with salutation
________________________________________
From: Ash, Jay (EOHED)
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 5:58 PM
To: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Cc: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Povich, Lon (GOV); Frazier, Ricks (EOHED); Sullivan,
Jennifer F. (ANF)
Subject: RE: GE Memo 2 amended
With Lon's changes and others incorporated. I'll dig up the salutation structure now.
Love (whops, too gushy)
Somewhat sincerely,
Jay
________________________________________
From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 5:25 PM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED)
Cc: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Povich, Lon (GOV); Frazier, Ricks (EOHED); Sullivan,
Jennifer F. (ANF)
Subject: Re: GE Memo 2
Jay,
Please use a more matter of fact tone. It is a little too gushy.
I do like Mike's suggestion about describing what we have done--gathered our legal and financial teams, etc.
I would not use the term 'lease concessions', as we do not know what is accurate, but the language that Massport has
signed off on in the chart.
I would phrase the purchase of existing private property/building, or property swaps as a legal/technical challenge
that we believe would require more time to determine how to possibly overcome.
Please use the same structure of the salutation of the memo that Mike has been using.
Another draft?!
Thx.
Steve
Again, Massport remains committed to working with you on favorable lease terms over and
above those that accrue as a result of the $120 million initial lease support.
In order to provide additional perspective on Option A, I am also attaching a general description
of the neighborhood, as well as renderings which you may already have.
In short, Option A, the public option, provides for:
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option A
public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No additional publicly supported lease value opportunities;
A City property tax level which is based only on the improvements then made to the
existing building, thus likely resulting in a significantly reduced benefit;
Up to $25 million in State support infrastructure, although an existing building may not be
able to maximize this benefit;
As much State energy efficiency funding as is available and possible for an existing
building, based upon an energy audit, and
The possibility of making additional parking available should the building be proximate to
the garage Massport is building or if another location can be permitted for another public
parking garage.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option A
public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No additional publicly supported lease value opportunities;
Up to $20 million or more of City property tax relief, as the new construction of the
building will create ample new property tax to then be relieved;
$25 million in State offsite infrastructure and/or public transit improvements, which could
include bringing public utilities to the site and building-out the public sidewalks around
the building;
Maximum State energy efficiency contributions, to be determined in conjunction with
project design, and
The possibility of making additional parking available should the property be proximate
to the garage Massport is building or if another location can be permitted for another
public parking garage.
All members of our team remain available to discuss these matters with you in greater detail.
We look forward to continuing to work with you on this project and the additional aspects of your
companys interest in Massachusetts.
Sincerely,
Jay Ash
Secretary
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Ann, here's the weekend work on the subject. Any of us can talk further
about it as the need arises.
Cheers,
Jay
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Visibility
Located at the entrance to the Seaport / Innovation District coming from Logan
International Airport and points north.
Highly visible along the Congress Street corridor coming from downtown Boston.
Highly visible from the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center.
Views from the site to Boston Harbor.
Connections
Across the street from the World Trade Center MBTA Silver Line Station and Massports
Parking Garage (under design).
Ability to provide a direct and weather-protected pedestrian connection with Silver Line
Station and Garage.
Walk along World Trade Center Avenue to Boston Harbor and Seaport World Trade
Center or walk to the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center.
Mortons Steakhouse
Legal Harborside
Legal Test Kitchen
Del Friscos Steakhouse
75 on Liberty Wharf
Aura Restaurant
M.C. Spiedos
Rosa Mexicana
Sebastians
Salvatores
Temezcal
Jerry Remys Grille
No-Name Restaurant
Hotels
Residences
Future
Owner
Massport,
with
Massport
Board vote
required.
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
$120m in initial
lease value
support.
Additional
lease value
opportunities
possible with
Massport, as
building size,
lease terms are
developed.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
could be
included in
$25m of
additional
State
infrastructure
funding.
Public
ownership
allows for
maximum
State energy
efficiency
grant.
City tax relief
of up to $20m
or more
depending on
size of the
property and
employment
commitments.
Adjacent public
parking
availability.
Permitting is straight
forward working with
City/State for more time
certainty to the
development.
Building size, floor plates
and layout can be right-sized
for the end tenant, including
future growth.
A new building can
accommodate on-site
parking and other specific
needs.
Massport is an experienced
developer who can fully
access other public
supports.
Especially A-2 can be
developed with only one
tenant; private vacant
parcels may require multitenants.
New building will likely allow
for maximum energy and
operating efficiency.
Direct access to public
transportation and
convenient, adjacent public
parking garage.
Future
Owner
Private
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
Up to ~$40m
(Mass Life Science
Center), subject to
a MLSC Board
vote.
Already
constructed
building.
Future
Owner
Private
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
Up to ~$40m
(Mass Life
Science Center),
subject to a
MLSC Board
vote.
May be able to
select a higher
desired location.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
and bringing
public utilities to
the site could be
included in
$25m of
additional State
infrastructure
funding.
City tax relief of
up to $20m or
more depending
on size of the
property and
employment
commitments.
State energy
efficiency grant
available for
identifiable
energy
efficiency
project in a
private building.
State willing to
explore options
of supporting
public parking at
another
location.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option A
public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No additional publicly supported lease value opportunities;
A City property tax level which is based only on the improvements to be made to the
existing building, thus likely resulting in a significantly reduced benefit;
Up to $25 million in State support infrastructure, although an existing building may not be
able to maximize this benefit;
As much State energy efficiency funding as is available and possible for an existing
private building, based upon an energy audit, and
The possibility of making additional parking available should the building be proximate to
the garage Massport is building or if another location can be permitted for another public
parking garage.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option A
public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No additional publicly supported lease value opportunities;
Up to $20 million or more of City property tax relief, as the new construction of the
building will create ample new property tax to then be relieved;
$25 million in State offsite infrastructure and/or public transit improvements, which could
include bringing public utilities to the site and building-out the public sidewalks around
the building;
State energy efficiency contributions for private buildings, to be determined in
conjunction with project design and allowable, and
The possibility of making additional parking available should the property be proximate
to the garage Massport is building or if another location can be permitted for another
public parking garage.
All members of our team remain available to discuss these matters with you in greater detail.
We look forward to continuing to work with you on this project and the additional aspects of your
companys interest in Massachusetts.
Sincerely,
(signed)
Jay Ash
Secretary
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Need quick turn around. Here is the proposed letter. John Barros and Tom Glynn - okay with you?
To be sent with Massport A-2 description.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option A
public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No additional publicly supported lease value opportunities;
A City property tax level which is based only on the improvements to be made to the
existing building, thus likely resulting in a significantly reduced benefit;
Up to $25 million in State support infrastructure, although an existing building may not be
able to maximize this benefit;
As much State energy efficiency funding as is available and possible for an existing
building, based upon an energy audit, and
The possibility of making additional parking available should the building be proximate to
the garage Massport is building or if another location can be permitted for another public
parking garage.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option A
public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No additional publicly supported lease value opportunities;
Up to $20 million or more of City property tax relief, as the new construction of the
building will create ample new property tax to then be relieved;
$25 million in State offsite infrastructure and/or public transit improvements, which could
include bringing public utilities to the site and building-out the public sidewalks around
the building;
Maximum State energy efficiency contributions, to be determined in conjunction with
project design, and
The possibility of making additional parking available should the property be proximate
to the garage Massport is building or if another location can be permitted for another
public parking garage.
All members of our team remain available to discuss these matters with you in greater detail.
We look forward to continuing to work with you on this project and the additional aspects of your
companys interest in Massachusetts.
Sincerely,
Jay Ash
Secretary
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Michael.kennealy@MassMail.State.MA.US
Mcgaugh, James (GE Corporate)
Re: Thanks!
Sunday, December 13, 2015 6:31:27 PM
Thanks Jim! Very busy weekend again here for our team.
Mike Kennealy
> On Dec 13, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Mcgaugh, James (GE Corporate)
<james.mcgaugh@ge.com> wrote:
>
> Mike--thanks for hanging in there on this project. I think we're almost
there... Jim
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Glynn, Tom
Ash, Jay (EOHED); John Barros; Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Frazier, Ricks (EOHED); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF); Morse,
Elizabeth; Doolin, James; Garrity, Rob (DOT); Povich, Lon (GOV)
RE: GE Letter
Sunday, December 13, 2015 6:45:26 PM
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Visibility
Located at the entrance to the Seaport / Innovation District coming from Logan
International Airport and points north.
Highly visible along the Congress Street corridor coming from downtown Boston.
Highly visible from the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center.
Views from the site to Boston Harbor.
Connections
Across the street from the World Trade Center MBTA Silver Line Station and Massports
Parking Garage (under design).
Ability to provide a direct and weather-protected pedestrian connection with Silver Line
Station and Garage.
Walk along World Trade Center Avenue to Boston Harbor and Seaport World Trade
Center or walk to the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center.
Mortons Steakhouse
Legal Harborside
Legal Test Kitchen
Del Friscos Steakhouse
75 on Liberty Wharf
Aura Restaurant
M.C. Spiedos
Rosa Mexicana
Sebastians
Salvatores
Temezcal
Jerry Remys Grille
No-Name Restaurant
Hotels
Residences
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option A
public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No additional publicly supported lease value opportunities;
A City property tax level which is based only on the improvements to be made to the
existing building, thus likely resulting in a significantly reduced benefit;
Up to $25 million in State support infrastructure, although an existing building may not be
able to maximize this benefit;
As much State energy efficiency funding as is available and possible for an existing
private building, based upon an energy audit, and
The possibility of making additional parking available should the building be proximate to
the garage Massport is building or if another location can be permitted for another public
parking garage.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option A
public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No additional publicly supported lease value opportunities;
Up to $15 million or more of City property tax relief, as the new construction of the
building will create ample new property tax to then be relieved;
$25 million in State offsite infrastructure and/or public transit improvements, which could
include bringing public utilities to the site and building-out the public sidewalks around
the building;
State energy efficiency contributions for private buildings, to be determined in
conjunction with project design and allowable, and
The possibility of making additional parking available should the property be proximate
to the garage Massport is building or if another location can be permitted for another
public parking garage.
All members of our team remain available to discuss these matters with you in greater detail.
We look forward to continuing to work with you on this project and the additional aspects of your
companys interest in Massachusetts.
Sincerely,
(signed)
Jay Ash
Secretary
Future
Owner
Massport,
with
Massport
Board vote
required.
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
$120m in initial
lease value
support.
Additional
lease value
opportunities
possible with
Massport, as
building size,
lease terms are
developed.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
could be
included in
$25m of
additional
State
infrastructure
funding.
Public
ownership
allows for
maximum
State energy
efficiency
grant.
City tax relief
of up to $20m
or more
depending on
size of the
property and
employment
commitments.
Adjacent public
parking
availability.
Permitting is straight
forward working with
City/State for more time
certainty to the
development.
Building size, floor plates
and layout can be right-sized
for the end tenant, including
future growth.
A new building can
accommodate on-site
parking and other specific
needs.
Massport is an experienced
developer who can fully
access other public
supports.
Especially A-2 can be
developed with only one
tenant; private vacant
parcels may require multitenants.
New building will likely allow
for maximum energy and
operating efficiency.
Direct access to public
transportation and
convenient, adjacent public
parking garage.
Future
Owner
Private
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
Up to ~$40m
(Mass Life Science
Center), subject to
a MLSC Board
vote.
Already
constructed
building.
Future
Owner
Private
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
Up to ~$40m
(Mass Life
Science Center),
subject to a
MLSC Board
vote.
May be able to
select a higher
desired location.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
and bringing
public utilities to
the site could be
included in
$25m of
additional State
infrastructure
funding.
City tax relief of
up to $15m or
more depending
on size of the
property and
employment
commitments.
State energy
efficiency grant
available for
identifiable
energy
efficiency
project in a
private building.
State willing to
explore options
of supporting
public parking at
another
location.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
No - was question about them, so I left them out. GE already has them.
________________________________________
From: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED)
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 6:59 PM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED)
Subject: Re: GE Letter
Jay - renderings from City going too?
Mike Kennealy
> On Dec 13, 2015, at 6:30 PM, Ash, Jay (EOHED)
<jay.ash@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
>
> Need quick turn around. Here is the proposed letter. John Barros and
Tom Glynn - okay with you?
>
> To be sent with Massport A-2 description.
> <GE Memo to Letter 2.docx>
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Good.
A bit after 7 pm would be fine.
Please also copy Mo.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 13, 2015, at 6:56 PM, Ash, Jay (EOHED)
<jay.ash@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
>
> John and I have talked. He is reviewing.
> ________________________________________
> From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 6:53 PM
> To: Ash, Jay (EOHED)
> Cc: John Barros; Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Frazier, Ricks (EOHED);
Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF); Tom Glynn; Morse,
Elizabeth; jdoolin@massport.com; Garrity, Rob (DOT); Povich, Lon (GOV)
> Subject: Re: GE Letter
>
> Try calling John Barros?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Dec 13, 2015, at 6:30 PM, Ash, Jay (EOHED)
<jay.ash@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
>>
>> Need quick turn around. Here is the proposed letter. John Barros and
Tom Glynn - okay with you?
>>
>> To be sent with Massport A-2 description.
>> <GE Memo to Letter 2.docx>
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Great
Mike Kennealy
> On Dec 13, 2015, at 7:06 PM, Ash, Jay (EOHED)
<jay.ash@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
>
> No - was question about them, so I left them out. GE already has them.
> ________________________________________
> From: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED)
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 6:59 PM
> To: Ash, Jay (EOHED)
> Subject: Re: GE Letter
>
> Jay - renderings from City going too?
>
> Mike Kennealy
>
>> On Dec 13, 2015, at 6:30 PM, Ash, Jay (EOHED)
<jay.ash@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
>>
>> Need quick turn around. Here is the proposed letter. John Barros and
Tom Glynn - okay with you?
>>
>> To be sent with Massport A-2 description.
>> <GE Memo to Letter 2.docx>
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
We have completed our weekend task. Documents emailed to Ann Klee. A very big and gushy thanks to all for
your weekend of work. Great package. Let's continue to say in touch!
Go Pats (it is Sunday, right?!)
Jay
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Note, last substantive change was City tax relief on new building on
vacant land. Changed up to 20 to up to $15m or more in property tax
relief.
________________________________________
From: Ash, Jay (EOHED)
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 7:06 PM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED); Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Cc: John Barros; Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Frazier, Ricks (EOHED);
Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF); Tom Glynn; Morse,
Elizabeth; jdoolin@massport.com; Garrity, Rob (DOT); Povich, Lon (GOV)
Subject: GE emailed
We have completed our weekend task. Documents emailed to Ann Klee. A
very big and gushy thanks to all for your weekend of work. Great package.
Let's continue to say in touch!
Go Pats (it is Sunday, right?!)
Jay
Future
Owner
Massport,
with
Massport
Board vote
required.
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
$120m in initial
lease value
support.
Additional
lease value
opportunities
possible with
Massport, as
building size,
lease terms are
developed.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
could be
included in
$25m of
additional
State
infrastructure
funding.
Public
ownership
allows for
maximum
State energy
efficiency
grant.
City tax relief
of up to $20m
or more
depending on
size of the
property and
employment
commitments.
Adjacent public
parking
availability.
Permitting is straight
forward working with
City/State for more time
certainty to the
development.
Building size, floor plates
and layout can be right-sized
for the end tenant, including
future growth.
A new building can
accommodate on-site
parking and other specific
needs.
Massport is an experienced
developer who can fully
access other public
supports.
Especially A-2 can be
developed with only one
tenant; private vacant
parcels may require multitenants.
New building will likely allow
for maximum energy and
operating efficiency.
Direct access to public
transportation and
convenient, adjacent public
parking garage.
Future
Owner
Private
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
Up to ~$40m
(Mass Life Science
Center), subject to
a MLSC Board
vote.
Already
constructed
building.
Future
Owner
Private
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
Up to ~$40m
(Mass Life
Science Center),
subject to a
MLSC Board
vote.
May be able to
select a higher
desired location.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
and bringing
public utilities to
the site could be
included in
$25m of
additional State
infrastructure
funding.
City tax relief of
up to $15m or
more depending
on size of the
property and
employment
commitments.
State energy
efficiency grant
available for
identifiable
energy
efficiency
project in a
private building.
State willing to
explore options
of supporting
public parking at
another
location.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option A
public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No additional publicly supported lease value opportunities;
A City property tax level which is based only on the improvements to be made to the
existing building, thus likely resulting in a significantly reduced benefit;
Up to $25 million in State support infrastructure, although an existing building may not be
able to maximize this benefit;
As much State energy efficiency funding as is available and possible for an existing
private building, based upon an energy audit, and
The possibility of making additional parking available should the building be proximate to
the garage Massport is building or if another location can be permitted for another public
parking garage.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option A
public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No additional publicly supported lease value opportunities;
Up to $15 million or more of City property tax relief, as the new construction of the
building will create ample new property tax to then be relieved;
$25 million in State offsite infrastructure and/or public transit improvements, which could
include bringing public utilities to the site and building-out the public sidewalks around
the building;
State energy efficiency contributions for private buildings, to be determined in
conjunction with project design and allowable, and
The possibility of making additional parking available should the property be proximate
to the garage Massport is building or if another location can be permitted for another
public parking garage.
All members of our team remain available to discuss these matters with you in greater detail.
We look forward to continuing to work with you on this project and the additional aspects of your
companys interest in Massachusetts.
Sincerely,
(signed)
Jay Ash
Secretary
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Visibility
Located at the entrance to the Seaport / Innovation District coming from Logan
International Airport and points north.
Highly visible along the Congress Street corridor coming from downtown Boston.
Highly visible from the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center.
Views from the site to Boston Harbor.
Connections
Across the street from the World Trade Center MBTA Silver Line Station and Massports
Parking Garage (under design).
Ability to provide a direct and weather-protected pedestrian connection with Silver Line
Station and Garage.
Walk along World Trade Center Avenue to Boston Harbor and Seaport World Trade
Center or walk to the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center.
Mortons Steakhouse
Legal Harborside
Legal Test Kitchen
Del Friscos Steakhouse
75 on Liberty Wharf
Aura Restaurant
M.C. Spiedos
Rosa Mexicana
Sebastians
Salvatores
Temezcal
Jerry Remys Grille
No-Name Restaurant
Hotels
Residences
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Note, last substantive change was City tax relief on new building on
vacant land. Changed up to 20 to up to $15m or more in property tax
relief.
________________________________________
From: Ash, Jay (EOHED)
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 7:06 PM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED); Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Cc: John Barros; Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Frazier, Ricks (EOHED);
Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF); Tom Glynn; Morse,
Elizabeth; jdoolin@massport.com; Garrity, Rob (DOT); Povich, Lon (GOV)
Subject: GE emailed
We have completed our weekend task. Documents emailed to Ann Klee. A
very big and gushy thanks to all for your weekend of work. Great package.
Let's continue to say in touch!
Go Pats (it is Sunday, right?!)
Jay
Future
Owner
Massport,
with
Massport
Board vote
required.
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
$120m in initial
lease value
support.
Additional
lease value
opportunities
possible with
Massport, as
building size,
lease terms are
developed.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
could be
included in
$25m of
additional
State
infrastructure
funding.
Public
ownership
allows for
maximum
State energy
efficiency
grant.
City tax relief
of up to $20m
or more
depending on
size of the
property and
employment
commitments.
Adjacent public
parking
availability.
Permitting is straight
forward working with
City/State for more time
certainty to the
development.
Building size, floor plates
and layout can be right-sized
for the end tenant, including
future growth.
A new building can
accommodate on-site
parking and other specific
needs.
Massport is an experienced
developer who can fully
access other public
supports.
Especially A-2 can be
developed with only one
tenant; private vacant
parcels may require multitenants.
New building will likely allow
for maximum energy and
operating efficiency.
Direct access to public
transportation and
convenient, adjacent public
parking garage.
Future
Owner
Private
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
Up to ~$40m
(Mass Life Science
Center), subject to
a MLSC Board
vote.
Already
constructed
building.
Future
Owner
Private
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
Up to ~$40m
(Mass Life
Science Center),
subject to a
MLSC Board
vote.
May be able to
select a higher
desired location.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
and bringing
public utilities to
the site could be
included in
$25m of
additional State
infrastructure
funding.
City tax relief of
up to $15m or
more depending
on size of the
property and
employment
commitments.
State energy
efficiency grant
available for
identifiable
energy
efficiency
project in a
private building.
State willing to
explore options
of supporting
public parking at
another
location.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option A
public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No additional publicly supported lease value opportunities;
A City property tax level which is based only on the improvements to be made to the
existing building, thus likely resulting in a significantly reduced benefit;
Up to $25 million in State support infrastructure, although an existing building may not be
able to maximize this benefit;
As much State energy efficiency funding as is available and possible for an existing
private building, based upon an energy audit, and
The possibility of making additional parking available should the building be proximate to
the garage Massport is building or if another location can be permitted for another public
parking garage.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option A
public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No additional publicly supported lease value opportunities;
Up to $15 million or more of City property tax relief, as the new construction of the
building will create ample new property tax to then be relieved;
$25 million in State offsite infrastructure and/or public transit improvements, which could
include bringing public utilities to the site and building-out the public sidewalks around
the building;
State energy efficiency contributions for private buildings, to be determined in
conjunction with project design and allowable, and
The possibility of making additional parking available should the property be proximate
to the garage Massport is building or if another location can be permitted for another
public parking garage.
All members of our team remain available to discuss these matters with you in greater detail.
We look forward to continuing to work with you on this project and the additional aspects of your
companys interest in Massachusetts.
Sincerely,
(signed)
Jay Ash
Secretary
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Visibility
Located at the entrance to the Seaport / Innovation District coming from Logan
International Airport and points north.
Highly visible along the Congress Street corridor coming from downtown Boston.
Highly visible from the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center.
Views from the site to Boston Harbor.
Connections
Across the street from the World Trade Center MBTA Silver Line Station and Massports
Parking Garage (under design).
Ability to provide a direct and weather-protected pedestrian connection with Silver Line
Station and Garage.
Walk along World Trade Center Avenue to Boston Harbor and Seaport World Trade
Center or walk to the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center.
Mortons Steakhouse
Legal Harborside
Legal Test Kitchen
Del Friscos Steakhouse
75 on Liberty Wharf
Aura Restaurant
M.C. Spiedos
Rosa Mexicana
Sebastians
Salvatores
Temezcal
Jerry Remys Grille
No-Name Restaurant
Hotels
Residences
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Note, last substantive change was City tax relief on new building on vacant land. Changed up to 20 to up to $15m
or more in property tax relief.
________________________________________
From: Ash, Jay (EOHED)
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 7:06 PM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED); Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Cc: John Barros; Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Frazier, Ricks (EOHED); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Sullivan, Jennifer
F. (ANF); Tom Glynn; Morse, Elizabeth; jdoolin@massport.com; Garrity, Rob (DOT); Povich, Lon (GOV)
Subject: GE emailed
We have completed our weekend task. Documents emailed to Ann Klee. A very big and gushy thanks to all for
your weekend of work. Great package. Let's continue to say in touch!
Go Pats (it is Sunday, right?!)
Jay
Future
Owner
Massport,
with
Massport
Board vote
required.
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
$120m in initial
lease value
support.
Additional
lease value
opportunities
possible with
Massport, as
building size,
lease terms are
developed.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
could be
included in
$25m of
additional
State
infrastructure
funding.
Public
ownership
allows for
maximum
State energy
efficiency
grant.
City tax relief
of up to $20m
or more
depending on
size of the
property and
employment
commitments.
Adjacent public
parking
availability.
Permitting is straight
forward working with
City/State for more time
certainty to the
development.
Building size, floor plates
and layout can be right-sized
for the end tenant, including
future growth.
A new building can
accommodate on-site
parking and other specific
needs.
Massport is an experienced
developer who can fully
access other public
supports.
Especially A-2 can be
developed with only one
tenant; private vacant
parcels may require multitenants.
New building will likely allow
for maximum energy and
operating efficiency.
Direct access to public
transportation and
convenient, adjacent public
parking garage.
Future
Owner
Private
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
Up to ~$40m
(Mass Life Science
Center), subject to
a MLSC Board
vote.
Already
constructed
building.
Future
Owner
Private
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
Up to ~$40m
(Mass Life
Science Center),
subject to a
MLSC Board
vote.
May be able to
select a higher
desired location.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
and bringing
public utilities to
the site could be
included in
$25m of
additional State
infrastructure
funding.
City tax relief of
up to $15m or
more depending
on size of the
property and
employment
commitments.
State energy
efficiency grant
available for
identifiable
energy
efficiency
project in a
private building.
State willing to
explore options
of supporting
public parking at
another
location.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option A
public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No additional publicly supported lease value opportunities;
A City property tax level which is based only on the improvements to be made to the
existing building, thus likely resulting in a significantly reduced benefit;
Up to $25 million in State support infrastructure, although an existing building may not be
able to maximize this benefit;
As much State energy efficiency funding as is available and possible for an existing
private building, based upon an energy audit, and
The possibility of making additional parking available should the building be proximate to
the garage Massport is building or if another location can be permitted for another public
parking garage.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option A
public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No additional publicly supported lease value opportunities;
Up to $15 million or more of City property tax relief, as the new construction of the
building will create ample new property tax to then be relieved;
$25 million in State offsite infrastructure and/or public transit improvements, which could
include bringing public utilities to the site and building-out the public sidewalks around
the building;
State energy efficiency contributions for private buildings, to be determined in
conjunction with project design and allowable, and
The possibility of making additional parking available should the property be proximate
to the garage Massport is building or if another location can be permitted for another
public parking garage.
All members of our team remain available to discuss these matters with you in greater detail.
We look forward to continuing to work with you on this project and the additional aspects of your
companys interest in Massachusetts.
Sincerely,
(signed)
Jay Ash
Secretary
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Visibility
Located at the entrance to the Seaport / Innovation District coming from Logan
International Airport and points north.
Highly visible along the Congress Street corridor coming from downtown Boston.
Highly visible from the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center.
Views from the site to Boston Harbor.
Connections
Across the street from the World Trade Center MBTA Silver Line Station and Massports
Parking Garage (under design).
Ability to provide a direct and weather-protected pedestrian connection with Silver Line
Station and Garage.
Walk along World Trade Center Avenue to Boston Harbor and Seaport World Trade
Center or walk to the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center.
Mortons Steakhouse
Legal Harborside
Legal Test Kitchen
Del Friscos Steakhouse
75 on Liberty Wharf
Aura Restaurant
M.C. Spiedos
Rosa Mexicana
Sebastians
Salvatores
Temezcal
Jerry Remys Grille
No-Name Restaurant
Hotels
Residences
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
LOL
I still need to decorate my tree!
________________________________________
From: Garrity, Rob (DOT) [rob.garrity@dot.state.ma.us]
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 7:08 PM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED)
Subject: Re: GE emailed
Good luck in that Christmas shopping. Isn't Walmart open 24 hours?
Rob Garrity
Chief of Staff
MassDOT
857-368-8893 (o)
617-356-4981 (c)
> On Dec 13, 2015, at 7:08 PM, Ash, Jay (EOHED)
<jay.ash@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
>
> We have completed our weekend task. Documents emailed to Ann Klee. A
very big and gushy thanks to all for your weekend of work. Great package.
Let's continue to say in touch!
>
> Go Pats (it is Sunday, right?!)
>
> Jay
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Mo, this was just sent to Ann Klee. Steve suggested I copy you. Thx for
your continued advice!
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option A
public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No additional publicly supported lease value opportunities;
A City property tax level which is based only on the improvements to be made to the
existing building, thus likely resulting in a significantly reduced benefit;
Up to $25 million in State support infrastructure, although an existing building may not be
able to maximize this benefit;
As much State energy efficiency funding as is available and possible for an existing
private building, based upon an energy audit, and
The possibility of making additional parking available should the building be proximate to
the garage Massport is building or if another location can be permitted for another public
parking garage.
Up to $40 million in employment tax benefits, in the place of the $120 million in Option A
public lease supports which are not available for private projects;
No additional publicly supported lease value opportunities;
Up to $15 million or more of City property tax relief, as the new construction of the
building will create ample new property tax to then be relieved;
$25 million in State offsite infrastructure and/or public transit improvements, which could
include bringing public utilities to the site and building-out the public sidewalks around
the building;
State energy efficiency contributions for private buildings, to be determined in
conjunction with project design and allowable, and
The possibility of making additional parking available should the property be proximate
to the garage Massport is building or if another location can be permitted for another
public parking garage.
All members of our team remain available to discuss these matters with you in greater detail.
We look forward to continuing to work with you on this project and the additional aspects of your
companys interest in Massachusetts.
Sincerely,
(signed)
Jay Ash
Secretary
Future
Owner
Massport,
with
Massport
Board vote
required.
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
$120m in initial
lease value
support.
Additional
lease value
opportunities
possible with
Massport, as
building size,
lease terms are
developed.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
could be
included in
$25m of
additional
State
infrastructure
funding.
Public
ownership
allows for
maximum
State energy
efficiency
grant.
City tax relief
of up to $20m
or more
depending on
size of the
property and
employment
commitments.
Adjacent public
parking
availability.
Permitting is straight
forward working with
City/State for more time
certainty to the
development.
Building size, floor plates
and layout can be right-sized
for the end tenant, including
future growth.
A new building can
accommodate on-site
parking and other specific
needs.
Massport is an experienced
developer who can fully
access other public
supports.
Especially A-2 can be
developed with only one
tenant; private vacant
parcels may require multitenants.
New building will likely allow
for maximum energy and
operating efficiency.
Direct access to public
transportation and
convenient, adjacent public
parking garage.
Future
Owner
Private
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
Up to ~$40m
(Mass Life Science
Center), subject to
a MLSC Board
vote.
Already
constructed
building.
Future
Owner
Private
Incentives
Positive
Challenges
Up to ~$40m
(Mass Life
Science Center),
subject to a
MLSC Board
vote.
May be able to
select a higher
desired location.
Offsite
streetscape
improvements
and bringing
public utilities to
the site could be
included in
$25m of
additional State
infrastructure
funding.
City tax relief of
up to $15m or
more depending
on size of the
property and
employment
commitments.
State energy
efficiency grant
available for
identifiable
energy
efficiency
project in a
private building.
State willing to
explore options
of supporting
public parking at
another
location.
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Visibility
Located at the entrance to the Seaport / Innovation District coming from Logan
International Airport and points north.
Highly visible along the Congress Street corridor coming from downtown Boston.
Highly visible from the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center.
Views from the site to Boston Harbor.
Connections
Across the street from the World Trade Center MBTA Silver Line Station and Massports
Parking Garage (under design).
Ability to provide a direct and weather-protected pedestrian connection with Silver Line
Station and Garage.
Walk along World Trade Center Avenue to Boston Harbor and Seaport World Trade
Center or walk to the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center.
Mortons Steakhouse
Legal Harborside
Legal Test Kitchen
Del Friscos Steakhouse
75 on Liberty Wharf
Aura Restaurant
M.C. Spiedos
Rosa Mexicana
Sebastians
Salvatores
Temezcal
Jerry Remys Grille
No-Name Restaurant
Hotels
Residences
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
John Barros
Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Ash, Jay (EOHED); Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Frazier, Ricks (EOHED); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Sullivan, Jennifer
F. (ANF); Tom Glynn; Morse, Elizabeth; jdoolin@massport.com; Garrity, Rob (DOT); Povich, Lon (GOV)
Re: GE emailed
Sunday, December 13, 2015 7:29:21 PM
Jay,
Can I get a copy to share with the Boston team.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 13, 2015, at 7:13 PM, Kadish, Steven (GOV)
> <steven.kadish@massmail.state.ma.us> wrote:
>
> Thank you all!!!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Dec 13, 2015, at 7:08 PM, Ash, Jay (EOHED)
>> <jay.ash@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
>>
>> We have completed our weekend task. Documents emailed to Ann Klee. A
>> very big and gushy thanks to all for your weekend of work. Great
>> package. Let's continue to say in touch!
>>
>> Go Pats (it is Sunday, right?!)
>>
>> Jay
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
John Barros
Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Ash, Jay (EOHED); Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Frazier, Ricks (EOHED); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Sullivan, Jennifer
F. (ANF); Tom Glynn; Morse, Elizabeth; jdoolin@massport.com; Garrity, Rob (DOT); Povich, Lon (GOV)
Re: GE emailed
Sunday, December 13, 2015 7:30:09 PM
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Cowan, Mo
Ash, Jay (EOHED)
john.barros@boston.gov; Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Re: GE emailed - copies for your records
Sunday, December 13, 2015 10:09:15 PM
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Circulating their questions and the working draft of a response. John and I have talked. John will
review all and propose changes where necessary.
Updates
1. What are the employment tax benefits through the Mass Life Science Center?
specifically
a. What is the program?
i. MLSC offers a tax credit program to expand life sciences-related
employment opportunities, promote health-related innovations and
stimulate research and development, manufacturing and commercialization
in the life sciences in MA. GE Health has recently secured a MLSC award.
The new application would include both health division future employment
growth and the GE corporate positions. Upon approval of the MLSC Board,
GE would receive a tax credit. We are open discussing it as a refundable tax
credit.
b. What is the statutory authority supporting eligibility?
c. How was the $40m calculated?
i. The $40m proposal represents the largest award ever to be made from
the program. Its calculation is based on up to 100 GE Health jobs and up to
600 corporate jobs be located in MA over the next five years. The award
would be made for FY18-FY20 receipt.
2. What are the State energy efficiency contributions explanation of the program, eligibility
requirements, potential benefits, dollar level of support?
3. Property tax abatement what is the term and expected percentage?
i. The property tax abatement term is assumed to be ____ years and the
percentage of relief is expected to be _____%. The City is interested in both
job creation and the value of the building to be constructed. The
assumption has been 600 jobs and 150,000 s.f. of building, although the
calculation as to value is dependent on many other variables. Thus, the
actual value of the tax abatement will be dependent on the final project to
be built, and whether it is on private or public land.
4. What are the issues surround building a parking structure near a privately owned lot, ie is it
just availability of land/permitting?
i. Among the issues on a parking structure is the availability of land, the
ability to secure permitting and the mix of public or private parking that
would be included in the structure. The State is willing to engage in a
discussion about a grant for the structure through either the MassWorks or
I-Cubed program. Available funding would be requested through the
normal application process. A typical MassWorks award for parking
structure would be $5m-$10m. The I-Cubed program could make an award
of up to $50m for a garage, dependent upon job growth numbers that are in
excess of 600 (the 600 already being used to calculate other incentives
being offered and thus not available to leverage this I-Cubed opportunity).
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
jay.ash@state.ma.us
Beaton, Matthew (EEA)
GE energy grant available
Monday, December 14, 2015 10:46:17 AM
Steve has asked me to get from you ASAP the description of the commitment you can make
on energy efficiency grants for these three scenarios:
1. New publicly owned building (Massport)
2. New privately developed building
3. Existing private office building.
How much $, from where, and what is the process.
Can you do by noon? Submission update requested today by company.
Thx!
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Beth
The Life Sciences tax credit is authorized under G.L. c. 23I, 5(d), which provides for a number of
different incentives, including refundable tax credits for companies who commit to create at least
50 net new jobs in Massachusetts. To be eligible for life sciences tax credits, a company must meet
the requirements set out in G.L. c. 23I, 5(b) and be certified by the Centers board. Qualifying
companies may receive multiple awards. Taxpayers may use Life Sciences Tax Credits to offset up to
100% of taxable income under the provisions of G.L. c. 62, 6 (r) and c. 63, 38CC. If the amount of
the credit exceeds taxable income, the taxpayer may receive up to 90% of the value of the credit as
a refund. There is no specific limit on the amount of an award per net new full-time job created,
which is within the discretion of the Centers board, but the overall program is subject to a $25
million annual cap. See, G.L. c. 25I, 5(d), c. 62, 6(r)(4) and c. 63, 38CC(d). The annual cap is
currently further limited for administrative purposes to $20 million per year.
MLSC offers a tax credit program to expand life sciences-related employment opportunities,
promote health-related innovations and stimulate research and development, manufacturing and
commercialization in the life sciences in MA. GE Health has recently secured a MLSC award. The
new application may be based on both health division future employment growth and the GE
corporate positions. Upon approval of the MLSC Board, GE would receive a tax credit, which would
be refundable.
Ricks Frazier
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Gents:
Here is some info on availability of energy related funds related to the following three scenarios:
Restrictions
The use of ACP revenues received from each of the programs is to be overseen by DOER
with some restrictions (Department precedent has been to use ACP funds for energyrelated activities only) as follows:
(a) RPS Class I, 225 CMR 14.08(3)(c)--so as to further the commercial development of
RPS Class I Renewable Generation Units and Solar Carve-Out Renewable Generation
Units;
(b) RPS Class II, 225 CMR 15.08(3)(b)--no restrictions; and
(c) APS, 225 CMR 16.08(3)(b)--so as to further the commercial development of
Alternative Generation.
For the use of these funds, DOER develops annual ACP spending plans and compliance
reports. <http://www.mass.gov/eea/energy-utilities-clean-tech/renewable-energy/rpsaps/annual-compliance-reports.html>.
ACP MEMORANDUM
July 2014
The purpose of this memorandum is to lay out the process for managing ACP funds and tracking
projects funded by ACP. Its intent is to spell out the roles and responsibilities of DOER and the
Clean Energy Center (CEC).
This document will be updated as new procedures and controls are developed and
implemented. Revenue Collection
Mass CEC receives ACP funds one time per year from electric suppliers around July
o Mass CEC documents Supplier name, deposit amount and class category
based on information supplied by supplier
o Funds are kept in a standalone CEC account
DOER receives deposit information from CEC and certifies the accuracy of the
deposits including, appropriate class category, dollar amount, complete list of
payees
o In summary, CEC receives funds and document payees'.info, but DOER
policy staff need to certify accuracy with regard to the suppliers compliance
obligation
o Accuracy is certified through RPS Compliance Verification Process,
which is typically completed in July/August
DOER will work with CEC to develop a system to track interest earned by class and
formalize the reporting of interest earned and DOER's discretion over these funds
The governing document for this ACP DOER CEC relationship is an MTC MOU.
DOER will work to develop a new MOU with CEC
Spending Plan Development
Spending plan for the funds developed by DOER Commissioner subject to Secretary
approval.
Allocation of spending tied to available funds in ACP class category and
will be tracked accordingly to ensure DOER does not overcommit available
funding in each class.
Documentation files need to be maintained at DOER (e.g. DEP MOU) for public
record
Project Execution I Fund Dispersal
CEC can only release funds as directed by the DOER Commissioner
Funds disburse in three ways:
o CEC releases funds to DOER and DOER deposits funds in generic DOER trust
account
7006-7060 and now 7006-7056
CEC can also submit funds directly to DEP or
EEA per ACP disbursement memo and must be
accompanied by signed MOU with DOER and
receiving agency. (CERP DEP)
DOER will track funds in both held by CEC and by DOER within the trust accounts in
MMARS.
o CEC releases funds to itself, when approved by DOER Commissioner, to run a
program under MOU agreement
CEC requires Board approval for
receiving funds o CEC releases funds to a third party
(e.g. DEP)
Inefficient to have CEC release funds to DOER to release to DEP
It will be DOER's responsibility to track the Commissioner's fund release orders to
CEC. The funds are reconciled with CEC and DOER once per quarter.
DOER will draft a 'fund release letter' that will go from DOER Commissioner to CEC
also called an ACP disbursement.
DOER will work with CEC CFO for communication regarding release of funds, interest
earned, etc. and work with State Treasurer to implement investment programs for with out
year scheduling.
DOER Program staff will need to be part of project oversight of ACP projects at DOER,
CEC, and 3rd Parties (DEP)
o Program staff will be assigned project by project
o DOER Fiscal will track overall budget and allocation and dispersal of funds.
Open question of process of returned funds for projects that complete under-budget.
Unlike some DOE project-specific grants, these monies can be reallocated for totally
new projects provided they are approved pursuant to the above process. DOER will
work with CEC to develop a tracking system for funds returning from 3rd parties, or
if there needs to be a request process for 3rd party proposals to repurpose funds.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
but there could be future opportunities. LBE awards are typically run through an
application process. DOER/LBE could provide a grant directly to Massport
through a contract that would need to specify that Massport would need to follow
their procurement and contracting rules for any projects.
2. New privately developed building
- Mass Save (as mentioned above) would be a key participant in any energy
efficiency building projects.
- Any DOER grants would need to be competitively procured and follow state
procurement law (laid out below).
3. Existing private office building.
Mass Save (as mentioned above) would be a key participant in any energy
efficiency building projects.
- Any DOER grants would need to be competitively procured and follow state
procurement law (laid out below).
Restrictions
The use of ACP revenues received from each of the programs is to be overseen by DOER
with some restrictions (Department precedent has been to use ACP funds for energy-
From:
To:
Date:
Attachments:
Updates
1.
What are the employment tax benefits through the Mass Life Science Center? specifically
a. What is the program?
i. MLSC offers a tax credit program to expand life sciences-related employment
opportunities, promote health-related innovations and stimulate research and
development, manufacturing and commercialization in the life sciences in MA.
GE Health has recently secured a MLSC award. The new application would
include both health division future employment growth and the GE corporate
positions. Upon approval of the MLSC Board, GE would receive a tax credit. We
are open discussing it as a refundable tax credit.
b. What is the statutory authority supporting eligibility?
i. The Life Sciences tax credit is authorized under G.L. c. 23I, 5(d), which provides
for a number of different incentives, including refundable tax credits for
companies who commit to create at least 50 net new jobs in Massachusetts. To
be eligible for life sciences tax credits, a company must meet the requirements
set out in G.L. c. 23I, 5(b) and be certified by the Centers board. Qualifying
companies may receive multiple awards. Taxpayers may use Life Sciences Tax
Credits to offset up to 100% of taxable income under the provisions of G.L. c. 62,
6 (r) and c. 63, 38CC. If the amount of the credit exceeds taxable income, the
taxpayer may receive up to 90% of the value of the credit as a refund. There is
no specific limit on the amount of an award per net new full-time job created,
which is within the discretion of the Centers board, but the overall program is
subject to a $25 million annual cap. See, G.L. c. 25I, 5(d), c. 62, 6(r)(4) and c.
63, 38CC(d).
c. How was the $40m calculated?
i. The $40m proposal represents the largest award ever to be made from the
program. Its calculation is based on up to 100 GE Health jobs and up to 600
corporate jobs be located in MA over the next five years. The award would be
made for FY18-FY20 receipt. The award is not based upon a formula, but is a
stretch from other awards that have been made.
2. What are the State energy efficiency contributions explanation of the program, eligibility
requirements, potential benefits, dollar level of support?
i. The funding for energy efficiency/renewable energy program is available from
the Mass Clean Energy Center (through the Alternative Compliance Payment
Fund) and from the Mass Save program. The maximum benefit to be derived,
which would be based on a customized package. A minimum award of
approximately $250,000 to a maximum that could approach or equal $5m or
more is possible.
ii. For a New publicly owned building (Option A), Mass Save (a program of the
utility companies) would be a key participant. Eversource and the MA
Department of Energy Resources (DOER) have expressed interest in working
with Massport as they do with other large customers to drive the collaborative
New privately developed building Mass Save (as mentioned above) would be a key participant in any
energy efficiency building projects. Any DOER grants would need to be competitively procured and
follow state procurement law (laid out below).
Existing private office building Mass Save (as mentioned above) would be a key participant in any
energy efficiency building projects. Any DOER grants would need to be competitively procured and
follow state procurement law (laid out below).
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Latest version
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Mike
A few comments.
Ricks
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Updates
1.
What are the employment tax benefits through the Mass Life Science Center? specifically
a. What is the program?
i. MLSC offers a tax credit program to expand life sciences-related employment
opportunities, promote health-related innovations and stimulate research and
development, manufacturing and commercialization in the life sciences in MA.
GE Healthcare Life Sciences has recently secured an MLSC award of $3.15
million. A new application could be made through GE Healthcare, but may
consider both health division future employment growth and the GE corporate
positions. Upon approval of the MLSC Board, GE would receive a tax credit,
which can be refundable depending upon the particular credit applied for.The
new application would include both health division future employment growth
and the GE corporate positions. Upon approval of the MLSC Board, GE would
receive a tax credit. We are open discussing it as a refundable tax credit.
b. What is the statutory authority supporting eligibility?
i. The Life Sciences tax credit is authorized under G.L. c. 23I, 5(d), which provides
for a number of different incentives, including refundable tax credits for
companies who commit to create at least 50 net new jobs in Massachusetts. To
be eligible for life sciences tax credits, a company must meet the requirements
set out in G.L. c. 23I, 5(b) and be certified by the Centers board. Qualifying
companies may receive multiple awards. Taxpayers may use Life Sciences Tax
Credits to offset up to 100% of taxable income under the provisions of G.L. c. 62,
6 (r) and c. 63, 38CC. If the amount of the credit exceeds taxable income, the
taxpayer may receive up to 90% of the value of the credit as a refund. There is
no specific limit on the amount of an award per net new full-time job created,
which is within the discretion of the Centers board, but the overall program is
subject to a $25 million annual cap. See, G.L. c. 25I, 5(d), c. 62, 6(r)(4) and c.
63, 38CC(d).
c. How was the $40m calculated?
i. The $40m proposal represents the largest award ever to be made from the
program. Its calculation is based on up to 100 GE Health jobs and up to 600
corporate jobs be located in MA over the next five years. The award would be
made for FY18-FY20 receipt. The award is not based upon a formula, but is a
stretch from other awards that have been made.
2. What are the State energy efficiency contributions explanation of the program, eligibility
requirements, potential benefits, dollar level of support?
i. The funding for energy efficiency/renewable energy program is available from
the Mass Clean Energy Center (through the Alternative Compliance Payment
Fund) and from the Mass Save program. The maximum benefit to would be
derived, which would be based on a customized package customized for the
property selected. A minimum award of approximately $250,000 to a maximum
that could approach or equal $5m or more is possible.
ii. For a New publicly owned building (Option A), Mass Save (a program of the
utility companies) would be a key participant. Eversource and the MA
Department of Energy Resources (DOER) have expressed interest in working
with Massport as they do with other large customers to drive the a collaborative
efficiency project. Additionally, a publicly owned building could participate in
DOERs Leading by Example program (LBE), where ACP (Alternative Compliance
Payment controlled by the MA Clean Energy Center) funds could be utilized to
support energy efficiency/renewable upgrades, particularly around innovation
and new technology. There are currently not existing initiatives that these
scenarios fit into, but there could be future opportunities. LBE awards are
typically run through an application process. DOER/LBE could provide a grant
directly to Massport through a contract that would need to specify that
Massport would need to follow their DOER procurement and contracting rules
for any projects.
iii. A new privately developed building or an existing private office building could
also benefit from the same Mass Save program. A private building is not eligible
for DOERs LBE program, so any grant would need to be competitively procured
and follow state procurement law.
3. Property tax abatement what is the term and expected percentage?
i. The property tax abatement term is assumed to be ____ years and the
percentage of relief is expected to be _____%. The City is interested in both job
creation and the value of the building to be constructed. The assumption has
been 600 jobs and 150,000 s.f. of building , although the calculation as to value
is dependent on many other variables. Thus, the actual value of the tax
abatement will be dependent on the final project to be built, and whether it is
on private or public land.
4. What are the issues surround building a parking structure near a privately owned lot, ie is it just
availability of land/permitting?
i. We are willing to explore this possibility if it furthers GE plans. The major issue
is a general parking restriction that could impact any future offsite parking
proposal. Other issues include Among the issues on a parking structure is the
availability of land, the ability to secure permitting and the mix of public or
private parking that would be included in the structure. The State is willing to
engage in a discussion about a grant for the structure through either the
MassWorks or I-Cubed program. Available funding would be requested through
the normal application process. A typical MassWorks award for parking
structure has been in the would be $5m-$10m range, but that is not a hard
limit. The I-Cubed program could make an award of up to $50m for a garage,
dependent upon job growth numbers that are in excess of 600 (the 600 already
being used to calculate other incentives being offered and thus not available to
leverage this I-Cubed opportunity).
New privately developed building Mass Save (as mentioned above) would be a key participant in any
energy efficiency building projects. Any DOER grants would need to be competitively procured and
follow state procurement law (laid out below).
Existing private office building Mass Save (as mentioned above) would be a key participant in any
energy efficiency building projects. Any DOER grants would need to be competitively procured and
follow state procurement law (laid out below).
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Susan can you print this out and bring in to Jay and me
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Mike
A few comments.
Ricks
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Updates
1.
What are the employment tax benefits through the Mass Life Science Center? specifically
a. What is the program?
i. MLSC offers a tax credit program to expand life sciences-related employment
opportunities, promote health-related innovations and stimulate research and
development, manufacturing and commercialization in the life sciences in MA.
GE Healthcare Life Sciences has recently secured an MLSC award of $3.15
million. A new application could be made through GE Healthcare, but may
consider both health division future employment growth and the GE corporate
positions. Upon approval of the MLSC Board, GE would receive a tax credit,
which can be refundable depending upon the particular credit applied for.The
new application would include both health division future employment growth
and the GE corporate positions. Upon approval of the MLSC Board, GE would
receive a tax credit. We are open discussing it as a refundable tax credit.
b. What is the statutory authority supporting eligibility?
i. The Life Sciences tax credit is authorized under G.L. c. 23I, 5(d), which provides
for a number of different incentives, including refundable tax credits for
companies who commit to create at least 50 net new jobs in Massachusetts. To
be eligible for life sciences tax credits, a company must meet the requirements
set out in G.L. c. 23I, 5(b) and be certified by the Centers board. Qualifying
companies may receive multiple awards. Taxpayers may use Life Sciences Tax
Credits to offset up to 100% of taxable income under the provisions of G.L. c. 62,
6 (r) and c. 63, 38CC. If the amount of the credit exceeds taxable income, the
taxpayer may receive up to 90% of the value of the credit as a refund. There is
no specific limit on the amount of an award per net new full-time job created,
which is within the discretion of the Centers board, but the overall program is
subject to a $25 million annual cap. See, G.L. c. 25I, 5(d), c. 62, 6(r)(4) and c.
63, 38CC(d).
c. How was the $40m calculated?
i. The $40m proposal represents the largest award ever to be made from the
program. Its calculation is based on up to 100 GE Health jobs and up to 600
corporate jobs be located in MA over the next five years. The award would be
made for FY18-FY20 receipt. The award is not based upon a formula, but is a
stretch from other awards that have been made.
2. What are the State energy efficiency contributions explanation of the program, eligibility
requirements, potential benefits, dollar level of support?
i. The funding for energy efficiency/renewable energy program is available from
the Mass Clean Energy Center (through the Alternative Compliance Payment
Fund) and from the Mass Save program. The maximum benefit to would be
derived, which would be based on a customized package customized for the
property selected. A minimum award of approximately $250,000 to a maximum
that could approach or equal $5m or more is possible.
ii. For a New publicly owned building (Option A), Mass Save (a program of the
utility companies) would be a key participant. Eversource and the MA
Department of Energy Resources (DOER) have expressed interest in working
with Massport as they do with other large customers to drive the a collaborative
efficiency project. Additionally, a publicly owned building could participate in
DOERs Leading by Example program (LBE), where ACP (Alternative Compliance
Payment controlled by the MA Clean Energy Center) funds could be utilized to
support energy efficiency/renewable upgrades, particularly around innovation
and new technology. There are currently not existing initiatives that these
scenarios fit into, but there could be future opportunities. LBE awards are
typically run through an application process. DOER/LBE could provide a grant
directly to Massport through a contract that would need to specify that
Massport would need to follow their DOER procurement and contracting rules
for any projects.
iii. A new privately developed building or an existing private office building could
also benefit from the same Mass Save program. A private building is not eligible
for DOERs LBE program, so any grant would need to be competitively procured
and follow state procurement law.
3. Property tax abatement what is the term and expected percentage?
i. The property tax abatement term is assumed to be ____ years and the
percentage of relief is expected to be _____%. The City is interested in both job
creation and the value of the building to be constructed. The assumption has
been 600 jobs and 150,000 s.f. of building , although the calculation as to value
is dependent on many other variables. Thus, the actual value of the tax
abatement will be dependent on the final project to be built, and whether it is
on private or public land.
4. What are the issues surround building a parking structure near a privately owned lot, ie is it just
availability of land/permitting?
i. We are willing to explore this possibility if it furthers GE plans. The major issue
is a general parking restriction that could impact any future offsite parking
proposal. Other issues include Among the issues on a parking structure is the
availability of land, the ability to secure permitting and the mix of public or
private parking that would be included in the structure. The State is willing to
engage in a discussion about a grant for the structure through either the
MassWorks or I-Cubed program. Available funding would be requested through
the normal application process. A typical MassWorks award for parking
structure has been in the would be $5m-$10m range, but that is not a hard
limit. The I-Cubed program could make an award of up to $50m for a garage,
dependent upon job growth numbers that are in excess of 600 (the 600 already
being used to calculate other incentives being offered and thus not available to
leverage this I-Cubed opportunity).
New privately developed building Mass Save (as mentioned above) would be a key participant in any
energy efficiency building projects. Any DOER grants would need to be competitively procured and
follow state procurement law (laid out below).
Existing private office building Mass Save (as mentioned above) would be a key participant in any
energy efficiency building projects. Any DOER grants would need to be competitively procured and
follow state procurement law (laid out below).
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Team:
Could you please begin to assemble all the information we have access to regarding 253 Summer
Street, Boston?
Site, history, newspaper articles, etc.
Please send to Jay, Mike K, and John Barros.
Thx.
Steve
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Could you please begin to assemble all the information we have access to regarding
253 Summer Street, Boston?
Site, history, newspaper articles, etc.
Please send to Jay, Mike K, and John Barros.
Thx.
Steve
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Call with the company and others at 7:30 am tomorrow/Tuesday toreview the 3 alternatives
we discussed this evening.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
just hung up with Ann, John and MO - good call. Want to talk at 7:15 just
you and me. No new news, but just a good feeling.
________________________________________
From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 7:13 PM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED)
Cc: John Barros; Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Frazier, Ricks (EOHED);
Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF); Tom Glynn; Morse,
Elizabeth; jdoolin@massport.com; Garrity, Rob (DOT); Povich, Lon (GOV)
Subject: Re: GE emailed
Thank you all!!!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 13, 2015, at 7:08 PM, Ash, Jay (EOHED)
<jay.ash@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
>
> We have completed our weekend task. Documents emailed to Ann Klee. A
very big and gushy thanks to all for your weekend of work. Great package.
Let's continue to say in touch!
>
> Go Pats (it is Sunday, right?!)
>
> Jay
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Yes
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
John Barros
Frazier, Ricks (EOHED)
Conference Call
Tuesday, December 15, 2015 12:32:55 PM
Hi Rick,
I believe Sec. Ash mentioned the City of Boston/BRA's interest in talk about some
scenarios we are considering.
Can we schedule a 2pm conference call to discuss it. Thanks.
-John Barros
Chief of Economic Development
Office of Mayor Martin J. Walsh
6th Floor, Room 603
Boston City Hall, Boston MA 02201
t: 617-635-5729
http://www.cityofboston.gov
SHARE YOUR VISION. SHAPE OUR CITY.
http://imagine.boston.gov/
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Ricks Frazier
Hi Rick,
I believe Sec. Ash mentioned the City of Boston/BRA's interest in talk about some
scenarios we are considering.
Can we schedule a 2pm conference call to discuss it. Thanks.
-John Barros
Chief of Economic Development
Office of Mayor Martin J. Walsh
6th Floor, Room 603
Boston City Hall, Boston MA 02201
t: 617-635-5729
http://www.cityofboston.gov
SHARE YOUR VISION. SHAPE OUR CITY.
http://imagine.boston.gov/
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Jen
Would you have another few minutes this PM to discuss City/BRAs vision of the latest scenario
involving their acquisition of the private building? I think I have steered them in the right direction,
but would appreciate a gut check on their concept.
Ricks Frazier
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
John Barros
Tom Glynn; Ash, Jay (EOHED); Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF); EMorse@massport.com;
Frazier, Ricks (EOHED); Povich, Lon (GOV); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); jdoolin@massport.com; Kadish, Steven
(GOV); Garrity, Rob (DOT); daniel.koh@boston.gov; Kadish, Steven (GOV); JPranckevicius; Pollack, Stephanie
(DOT)
Fwd: Fort Point Parcels (Review before forwarding)
Wednesday, December 16, 2015 7:29:27 AM
252 Summer Street: Existing office building is 74' tall and 124,382 GSF.
Currently owned by Synergy Investments.
19-27 Melcher Street: Existing building is 70' tall. Per the 100 Acres PDA, this
building is combined with 29-37 Melcher for an overal total of 105,006 GSF. 1927 Melcher is curently owned by Synergy Investments. 29-37 Melcher is owned
by Clarion Partners.
5 Necco Ct (Defined as 50 Necco Ct in PDA #69): Existing vacant building is
85' and 55,344 GSF. Currently owned by Gillette. (Would want to confirm that
this is a site of interest)
*Note: All sites are subject to Boston Landmarks Commission review per the Fort
Point Channel Landmark District (link here) and the Air Pollution Control
Commission regarding the Restricted Parking Overlay District.
As a caveat, his information was put together today and should any one (or
multiple) of these sites be chosen, I would recommend further regulatory
analysis. Thanks and please let me know if you have any comments.
-Jonathan Greeley, AICP
Director of Development Review
617.918.4486
jonathan.greeley@boston.gov
BRA/EDIC
One City Hall Square| Boston, MA 02201
BostonRedevelopmentAuthority.org
BRA/EDIC
One City Hall Square| Boston, MA 02201
BostonRedevelopmentAuthority.org
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
I have not spoken with Boston or BRA directly. It sounded to me like the smaller group would
discuss options and youd reach out if you needed anything. I am happy to help if any of you have
questions. Thanks.
Jen
I got stuck on mute during the call, but if you do set up a call with the City and/or BRA, Id like to
participate, both for my own purposes and in case MassWorks might provide a vehicle for funding.
Just give a shout.
Thanks.
Ricks Frazier
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Paul there was a sentence Jay had in mind around "GE can plug into and benefit by this
ecosystem" - I recommend that you add that somewhere and send to Steve. Question - is there
a logical title for this?
Mike Kennealy
On Dec 17, 2015, at 3:39 PM, McMorrow, Paul (EOHED)
<paul.mcmorrow@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
Attached and pasted below
Massachusetts possesses the nations best-educated workforce, and the states deep
base of talent has allowed Massachusetts firms to build the deepest and most robust
innovation economy in the United States.
Roughly 40 percent of the Massachusetts workforce is employed in the innovation
economy a greater share than any other state. These employees work in a diverse
base of innovation clusters, including medical delivery, information technology, clean
energy, and the life sciences. In addition, Massachusetts firms, and Massachusetts
researchers, are driving dynamic growth in several emerging technology clusters,
including robotics, big data, cyber security, and digital health care.
Massachusetts is also the national leader in patents per capita, and the state now
boasts the fastest rate of new business formation in the country. The Commonwealth
sits atop leading innovation economy indexes, including the Milken Institutes State
Tech and Science Index, and the Information Technology and Innovation Foundations
State New Economy Index.
Nowhere is this innovation culture more evident than in the states globally leading
research institutions, such as MIT and Harvard. These institutions serve as sources of
technological innovation, engines of new business formation, and pipelines of new
talent. MIT talent has drawn the largest technology, pharmaceutical and life sciences
firms in the world to Kendall Square, and the university recently launched a $1.4 billion
redevelopment of Kendall Square. A recent Wired article dubbed the center of MITs
campus, the corner Main and Vassar in Kendall Square, as the worlds most innovative
intersection, and noted that MIT alumni are responsible for 6,900 current
Massachusetts startups.
Paul McMorrow
Director of policy and communications
Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development
617-788-3652 office
617-680-3849 cell
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Ok. wasnt sure how much of this was explicitly a pitch versus informational. Making that change
now
Paul there was a sentence Jay had in mind around "GE can plug into and benefit by this ecosystem" I recommend that you add that somewhere and send to Steve. Question - is there a logical title for
this?
Mike Kennealy
On Dec 17, 2015, at 3:39 PM, McMorrow, Paul (EOHED) <paul.mcmorrow@MassMail.State.MA.US>
wrote:
Attached and pasted below
Massachusetts possesses the nations best-educated workforce, and the states deep
base of talent has allowed Massachusetts firms to build the deepest and most robust
innovation economy in the United States.
Roughly 40 percent of the Massachusetts workforce is employed in the innovation
economy a greater share than any other state. These employees work in a diverse
base of innovation clusters, including medical delivery, information technology, clean
energy, and the life sciences. In addition, Massachusetts firms, and Massachusetts
researchers, are driving dynamic growth in several emerging technology clusters,
including robotics, big data, cyber security, and digital health care.
Massachusetts is also the national leader in patents per capita, and the state now
boasts the fastest rate of new business formation in the country. The Commonwealth
sits atop leading innovation economy indexes, including the Milken Institutes State
Tech and Science Index, and the Information Technology and Innovation Foundations
State New Economy Index.
Nowhere is this innovation culture more evident than in the states globally leading
research institutions, such as MIT and Harvard. These institutions serve as sources of
technological innovation, engines of new business formation, and pipelines of new
talent. MIT talent has drawn the largest technology, pharmaceutical and life sciences
firms in the world to Kendall Square, and the university recently launched a $1.4 billion
redevelopment of Kendall Square. A recent Wired article dubbed the center of MITs
campus, the corner Main and Vassar in Kendall Square, as the worlds most innovative
intersection, and noted that MIT alumni are responsible for 6,900 current
Massachusetts startups.
Paul McMorrow
Director of policy and communications
Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development
617-788-3652 office
617-680-3849 cell
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Steve may have a different view and he will likely edit so let's get him the content asap.
Mike Kennealy
On Dec 17, 2015, at 3:46 PM, McMorrow, Paul (EOHED)
<paul.mcmorrow@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
Ok. wasnt sure how much of this was explicitly a pitch versus informational. Making
that change now
Paul there was a sentence Jay had in mind around "GE can plug into and benefit by this
ecosystem" - I recommend that you add that somewhere and send to Steve. Question
- is there a logical title for this?
Mike Kennealy
On Dec 17, 2015, at 3:39 PM, McMorrow, Paul (EOHED)
<paul.mcmorrow@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
Attached and pasted below
Massachusetts is also the national leader in patents per capita, and the
state now boasts the fastest rate of new business formation in the
country. The Commonwealth sits atop leading innovation economy
indexes, including the Milken Institutes State Tech and Science Index,
and the Information Technology and Innovation Foundations State New
Economy Index.
Paul McMorrow
Director of policy and communications
Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development
617-788-3652 office
617-680-3849 cell
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Massachusetts possesses the nations best-educated workforce, and the states deep base of talent
has allowed Massachusetts firms to build the deepest and most robust innovation economy in the
United States.
Roughly 40 percent of the Massachusetts workforce is employed in the innovation economy a
greater share than any other state. These employees work in a diverse base of innovation clusters,
including medical delivery, information technology, clean energy, and the life sciences. In addition,
Massachusetts firms, and Massachusetts researchers, are driving dynamic growth in several
emerging technology clusters, including robotics, big data, cyber security, and digital health care.
As a share of GDP, Massachusetts attracts more venture capital investment, more federal research
and development funding, and more National Institutes of Health funding, than any state in the US.
Massachusetts is also the national leader in patents per capita, and the state now boasts the fastest
rate of new business formation in the country. The Commonwealth sits atop leading innovation
economy indexes, including the Milken Institutes State Tech and Science Index, and the Information
Technology and Innovation Foundations State New Economy Index.
Greater Boston possesses a mature, and expanding, infrastructure for supporting innovation. The
regions innovation infrastructure includes the Cambridge Innovation Center, a collaborative
workspace that has launched some of Cambridges largest tech firms; LabCentral, a shared
laboratory space for high-growth biotechs; Harvards Innovation Lab; and the countrys largest
cleantech incubator, Greentown Labs. These assets support an unmatched community of
innovators, and they deepen the regions culture of innovation. GE can plug into and benefit from
this innovation ecosystem.
Nowhere is this innovation culture more evident than in the states globally leading research
institutions, such as MIT and Harvard. These institutions serve as sources of technological
innovation, engines of new business formation, and pipelines of new talent. MIT talent has drawn
the largest technology, pharmaceutical and life sciences firms in the world to Kendall Square, and
the university recently launched a $1.4 billion redevelopment of Kendall Square. A recent Wired
article dubbed the center of MITs campus, the corner Main and Vassar in Kendall Square, as the
worlds most innovative intersection, and noted that MIT alumni are responsible for 6,900 current
Massachusetts startups.
Paul McMorrow
Director of policy and communications
Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development
617-788-3652 office
617-680-3849 cell
Massachusetts possesses the nations best-educated workforce, and the states deep
base of talent has allowed Massachusetts firms to build the deepest and most robust
innovation economy in the United States.
Roughly 40 percent of the Massachusetts workforce is employed in the innovation
economy a greater share than any other state. These employees work in a diverse
base of innovation clusters, including medical delivery, information technology, clean
energy, and the life sciences. In addition, Massachusetts firms, and Massachusetts
researchers, are driving dynamic growth in several emerging technology clusters,
including robotics, big data, cyber security, and digital health care.
As a share of GDP, Massachusetts attracts more venture capital investment, more
federal research and development funding, and more National Institutes of Health
funding, than any state in the US.
Massachusetts is also the national leader in patents per capita, and the state now boasts
the fastest rate of new business formation in the country. The Commonwealth sits atop
leading innovation economy indexes, including the Milken Institutes State Tech and
Science Index, and the Information Technology and Innovation Foundations State New
Economy Index.
Massachusetts has prioritized investments in public-private research partnerships that
unlock emerging technologies, and lead to private sector job growth in innovation
sectors. In the past year, Massachusetts has committed up to $88 million in matching
funds for the implementation of public-private research projects, under the federal
National Network Manufacturing Innovation (NNMI) advanced manufacturing
competition. Massachusetts is participating in 3 NNMI advanced manufacturing
research centers: an MIT-led center for Integrated Photonics, a UMass Amherst-led
center for Flexible Hybrid Electronics, and a center on Revolutionary Fibers and Textiles
that will soon be awarded to MIT or UMass Lowell. These research partnerships will
bring together university researchers and private-sector partners in collision spaces that
advance the rapid commercialization and adoption of revolutionary technologies.
Greater Boston possesses a mature, and expanding, infrastructure for supporting
innovation. The regions innovation infrastructure includes the Cambridge Innovation
Center, a collaborative workspace that has launched some of Cambridges largest tech
firms; LabCentral, a shared laboratory space for high-growth biotechs; Harvards
Innovation Lab; and the countrys largest cleantech incubator, Greentown Labs. These
assets support an unmatched community of innovators, and they deepen the regions
culture of innovation. GE can plug into and benefit from this innovation ecosystem.
Nowhere is this innovation culture more evident than in the states globally leading
research institutions, such as MIT and Harvard. These institutions serve as sources of
technological innovation, engines of new business formation, and pipelines of new
talent. MIT talent has drawn the largest technology, pharmaceutical and life sciences
firms in the world to Kendall Square, and the university recently launched a $1.4 billion
redevelopment of Kendall Square. A recent Wired article dubbed the center of MITs
campus, the corner Main and Vassar in Kendall Square, as the worlds most innovative
intersection, and noted that MIT alumni are responsible for 6,900 current
Massachusetts startups.
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Steve may have a different view and he will likely edit so let's get him the content asap.
Mike Kennealy
On Dec 17, 2015, at 3:46 PM, McMorrow, Paul (EOHED) <paul.mcmorrow@MassMail.State.MA.US>
wrote:
Ok. wasnt sure how much of this was explicitly a pitch versus informational. Making
that change now
Paul there was a sentence Jay had in mind around "GE can plug into and benefit by this
ecosystem" - I recommend that you add that somewhere and send to Steve. Question
- is there a logical title for this?
Mike Kennealy
On Dec 17, 2015, at 3:39 PM, McMorrow, Paul (EOHED)
<paul.mcmorrow@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
Attached and pasted below
Massachusetts is also the national leader in patents per capita, and the
state now boasts the fastest rate of new business formation in the
country. The Commonwealth sits atop leading innovation economy
indexes, including the Milken Institutes State Tech and Science Index,
and the Information Technology and Innovation Foundations State New
Economy Index.
business formation, and pipelines of new talent. MIT talent has drawn the
largest technology, pharmaceutical and life sciences firms in the world to
Kendall Square, and the university recently launched a $1.4 billion
redevelopment of Kendall Square. A recent Wired article dubbed the
center of MITs campus, the corner Main and Vassar in Kendall Square, as
the worlds most innovative intersection, and noted that MIT alumni
are responsible for 6,900 current Massachusetts startups.
Paul McMorrow
Director of policy and communications
Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development
617-788-3652 office
617-680-3849 cell
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Thanks!
Mike Kennealy
On Dec 17, 2015, at 3:50 PM, McMorrow, Paul (EOHED)
<paul.mcmorrow@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
Done. Standing by for edits if any are needed.
Steve may have a different view and he will likely edit so let's get him the content asap.
Mike Kennealy
On Dec 17, 2015, at 3:46 PM, McMorrow, Paul (EOHED)
<paul.mcmorrow@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
Ok. wasnt sure how much of this was explicitly a pitch versus
informational. Making that change now
Paul there was a sentence Jay had in mind around "GE can plug into and
benefit by this ecosystem" - I recommend that you add that somewhere
and send to Steve. Question - is there a logical title for this?
Mike Kennealy
On Dec 17, 2015, at 3:39 PM, McMorrow, Paul (EOHED)
<paul.mcmorrow@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
technologies.
Paul McMorrow
Director of policy and communications
Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development
617-788-3652 office
617-680-3849 cell
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Could Marty and her team at MassDev help with chasing down some of this research?
Jen -- could Ben or others help?
Thx.
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Kadish, Steven (GOV)" <steven.kadish@MassMail.State.MA.US>
Date: December 18, 2015 at 6:28:19 PM EST
To: "Kelleher, Michael (GOV)" <Michael.Kelleher@MassMail.State.MA.US>
Cc: "Zarrella, Lily (GOV)" <lily.zarrella@MassMail.State.MA.US>, "Weikel,
Adam (GOV)" <adam.weikel@MassMail.State.MA.US>
Subject: Re: Any idea of timing for War on Talent materials?
If you aren't already, please look at US News and World Report.
Total # of engineers and scientists going to school in the Boston metro area and
how many graduate each year and what % that may be of the total in the US
More to come!
From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 5:00 PM
To: Kelleher, Michael (GOV)
Cc: Zarrella, Lily (GOV); Weikel, Adam (GOV)
Subject: Re: Any idea of timing for War on Talent materials?
Great!!
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 18, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Kelleher, Michael (GOV)
<Michael.Kelleher@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
Steve,
Thanks for the additional guidance for the war on talent materials. Lily
and I were able to add a few slides based on previous direction you and
Adam provided. We are going to plow through the list of additional items
(as outlined below, assigned to Lily or myself) and will send you a revised
PPT later this evening/first thing tomorrow for your review and additional
edits.
Thanks,
Michael
Include a list of universities in the top 50? Also a list of the top colleges?
> We may have more time and I will let you know.
> Please think if this is something to assign to Michael. It may be good to
see what he can do with something like this!!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Dec 17, 2015, at 9:55 PM, Weikel, Adam (GOV)
<adam.weikel@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Steve. Good to hear we have a little more time.
>>
>> I know this is an important assignment and I feel guilty responding with
an excuse. I'm usually all over these kinds of assignments, but we are
driving to North Carolina on Saturday/Sunday for a week with the family.
>> I can find a couple more hours to work on it Friday but I just don't think
I can do any major work by Monday.
>>
>> I will review the info from Sec Ash to see what I can incorporate and I'll
try to add a couple more slides to fill-in the story.
>>
>> I hope this isn't a huge problem.
>> -Adam
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message---->> From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
>> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 6:19 PM
>> To: Weikel, Adam (GOV)
>> Subject: RE: Any idea of timing for War on Talent materials?
>>
>> Wow!
>> This is terrific!
>>
>> We just got the word that rather than making a decision this week,
that they will not make a decision until mid-January.
>> So both the good and bad news is that we have more time.
>>
>> With this in mind, what further would you do by Monday?
>>
>> -----Original Message---->> From: Weikel, Adam (GOV)
>> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 5:50 PM
>> To: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
>> Subject: RE: Any idea of timing for War on Talent materials?
>>
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
I can check in with MassDev Steve. I think MassTech mightbe another good option and I will check there too.
Total # of engineers and scientists going to school in the Boston metro area and how many graduate each year and
what % that may be of the total in the US
More to come!
Great!!
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 18, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Kelleher, Michael (GOV) <Michael.Kelleher@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
Steve,
Thanks for the additional guidance for the war on talent materials. Lily
and I were able to add a few slides based on previous direction you and
Adam provided. We are going to plow through the list of additional items
(as outlined below, assigned to Lily or myself) and will send you a revised
PPT later this evening/first thing tomorrow for your review and additional
edits.
Thanks,
Michael
Include a list of universities in the top 50? Also a list of the top colleges?
Top academic medical centers?
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Please see what they can pull together for the end of the day Tuesday.
Contacting both entities would be helpful.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 19, 2015, at 4:10 PM, Kennealy, Michael (EOHED)
<Michael.kennealy@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
I can check in with MassDev Steve. I think MassTech mightbe another good option and I will check there too.
Total # of engineers and scientists going to school in the Boston metro area and how many graduate
each year and what % that may be of the total in the US
More to come!
Great!!
Sent from my iPhone
Steve,
Thanks,
Michael
materials?
>
> Not a problem!
> We may have more time and I will let you know.
> Please think if this is something to assign to Michael. It may
be good to see what he can do with something like this!!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Dec 17, 2015, at 9:55 PM, Weikel, Adam (GOV)
<adam.weikel@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Steve. Good to hear we have a little more time.
>>
>> I know this is an important assignment and I feel guilty
responding with an excuse. I'm usually all over these kinds
of assignments, but we are driving to North Carolina on
Saturday/Sunday for a week with the family.
>> I can find a couple more hours to work on it Friday but I
just don't think I can do any major work by Monday.
>>
>> I will review the info from Sec Ash to see what I can
incorporate and I'll try to add a couple more slides to fill-in
the story.
>>
>> I hope this isn't a huge problem.
>> -Adam
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message---->> From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
>> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 6:19 PM
>> To: Weikel, Adam (GOV)
>> Subject: RE: Any idea of timing for War on Talent
materials?
>>
>> Wow!
>> This is terrific!
>>
>> We just got the word that rather than making a decision
this week, that they will not make a decision until midJanuary.
>> So both the good and bad news is that we have more
time.
>>
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Ok
Mike Kennealy
On Dec 19, 2015, at 4:24 PM, Kadish, Steven (GOV)
<steven.kadish@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
Please see what they can pull together for the end of the day Tuesday.
Contacting both entities would be helpful.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 19, 2015, at 4:10 PM, Kennealy, Michael (EOHED)
<Michael.kennealy@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
I can check in with MassDev Steve. I think MassTech mightbe another good option and I will check
there too.
Total # of engineers and scientists going to school in the Boston metro area and
how many graduate each year and what % that may be of the total in the US
More to come!
Great!!
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 18, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Kelleher, Michael (GOV)
<Michael.Kelleher@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
Steve,
Thanks,
Michael
wrote:
>
> Great!
> I added a few slides overnight and brought
Michael into the loop this morning.
> He will keep building and send us something
revised this afternoon. He is also able to help
and edit over the weekend.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message----> From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 6:46 AM
> To: Weikel, Adam (GOV)
> Subject: Re: Any idea of timing for War on
Talent materials?
>
> Not a problem!
> We may have more time and I will let you
know.
> Please think if this is something to assign to
Michael. It may be good to see what he can do
with something like this!!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Dec 17, 2015, at 9:55 PM, Weikel, Adam
(GOV) <adam.weikel@MassMail.State.MA.US>
wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Steve. Good to hear we have a little
more time.
>>
>> I know this is an important assignment and I
feel guilty responding with an excuse. I'm
usually all over these kinds of assignments, but
we are driving to North Carolina on
Saturday/Sunday for a week with the family.
>> I can find a couple more hours to work on it
Friday but I just don't think I can do any major
work by Monday.
>>
>> I will review the info from Sec Ash to see
what I can incorporate and I'll try to add a
Talent materials?
>>
>> Thx.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Total # of engineers and scientists going to school in the Boston metro area and
how many graduate each year and what % that may be of the total in the US
More to come!
Great!!
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 18, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Kelleher, Michael (GOV)
<Michael.Kelleher@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
Steve,
Thanks,
Michael
>>
>> Thanks Steve. Good to hear we have a little
more time.
>>
>> I know this is an important assignment and I
feel guilty responding with an excuse. I'm
usually all over these kinds of assignments, but
we are driving to North Carolina on
Saturday/Sunday for a week with the family.
>> I can find a couple more hours to work on it
Friday but I just don't think I can do any major
work by Monday.
>>
>> I will review the info from Sec Ash to see
what I can incorporate and I'll try to add a
couple more slides to fill-in the story.
>>
>> I hope this isn't a huge problem.
>> -Adam
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message---->> From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
>> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 6:19 PM
>> To: Weikel, Adam (GOV)
>> Subject: RE: Any idea of timing for War on
Talent materials?
>>
>> Wow!
>> This is terrific!
>>
>> We just got the word that rather than
making a decision this week, that they will not
make a decision until mid-January.
>> So both the good and bad news is that we
have more time.
>>
>> With this in mind, what further would you
do by Monday?
>>
>> -----Original Message---->> From: Weikel, Adam (GOV)
>> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 5:50 PM
>> To: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
>> Subject: RE: Any idea of timing for War on
Talent materials?
>>
>> I'm sorry it is so late.
>> We only had a 20 min break midday and 10
minutes in the afternoon.
>> Attached is what I came up with
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message---->> From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
>> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 3:38 PM
>> To: Weikel, Adam (GOV)
>> Subject: Any idea of timing for War on
Talent materials?
>>
>> Thx.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Total # of engineers and scientists going to school in the Boston metro area and
how many graduate each year and what % that may be of the total in the US
More to come!
Great!!
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 18, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Kelleher, Michael (GOV)
<Michael.Kelleher@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
Steve,
Thanks,
Michael
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message---->> From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
>> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 3:38 PM
>> To: Weikel, Adam (GOV)
>> Subject: Any idea of timing for War on
Talent materials?
>>
>> Thx.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Total # of engineers and scientists going to school in the Boston metro area and
how many graduate each year and what % that may be of the total in the US
More to come!
Great!!
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 18, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Kelleher, Michael (GOV)
<Michael.Kelleher@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
Steve,
Thanks,
Michael
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message---->> From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
>> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 3:38 PM
>> To: Weikel, Adam (GOV)
>> Subject: Any idea of timing for War on
Talent materials?
>>
>> Thx.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
From:
Subject:
Date:
Berkshire Eagle:Gov. Baker to bring grant for South County school collaborations
Berkshire Eagle:Labor official rolls out skills grant program
Springfield Repub:Chimelis: Soldiers' Home needs Baker's attention - now
Springfield Repub:Gov. Charlie Baker says administration focusing on Holyoke Soldiers' Home
WAMC:New Report Highlights Economic Impact Of Mass. Defense Industry
Boston Globe: Editorial: Ending Sunday overtime shouldnt cost retail workers
NECN: Fed's Rate Increase and 2016's Economic Outlook[VIDEO]
Lawrence Eagle-Trib: Polartec factory is too big for needs
Lynn Item: Editorial:Lynn on PATH to progress
Lynn Item: Lynn on PATH to growth
Providence Journal: John Kostrzewa: GE to R.I.? Don't bet on it
Boston Globe: Walsh gives tentative support for measure to rein in evictions
Boston Globe: AGs program helps towns clean up derelict buildings
Wicked Local Swampscott: Chamber of Commerce hosts breakfast with Gov. Baker in Lynn
WAMC: New Report Highlights Economic Impact Of Mass. Defense Industry
Adrian Servetnick
Program and Communications Coordinator
Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development
e: adrian.servetnick@state.ma.us
p: 617-788-3615
t: @MassEOHED
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Any chance you are available for a call on the big project today? About Massworks. It has heated
up again.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Whoops 1:30
Is 1p okay?
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Ricks are you doing this? I just got forwarded the info.
Mike Kennealy
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Ok great. I asked Amy E about it and she said it would be "highly technical" so I don't think I'll join - what do you
think?
Mike Kennealy
> On Dec 22, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Frazier, Ricks (EOHED) <ricks.frazier@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
>
> I am.
>
> Ricks
>
> -----Original Message----> From: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED)
> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 1:24 PM
> To: Frazier, Ricks (EOHED)
> Subject: 130 call today
>
> Ricks are you doing this? I just got forwarded the info.
>
> Mike Kennealy
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Colleagues,
Let's please talk at noon to discuss the options regarding the BRA.
The company wants to have a 4 pm call to review the legal, technical and financial possibilities.
Devon or Brianna -- please send dial in info.
Thx.
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Folks, this is really tedious, with so many potential variations on each scenario. Nonetheless, here is a first draft
responding to the three basics of the scenarios. I think it encompasses everything, but need to sleep on it now. Feel
free to pick it apart!
Shared with a limited circulation. Chiefs should decided if they want to expand the loop now, or wait until the
smaller group has had at it.
Should we do a call at 8 to discuss what we are saying to them at 9?
Scenario #1
Description
253 Summer/
Melcher;
both Necco
Court
warehouses
(two);
separate
parking
structure on
P&G parking
lot;
additional
parking lot
frontage on
channel for
green space;
helipad;
access to
dock.
City
Funding
121B (up to
$20m) or
TIF (up to
$15m) on
253.
If improvements to
253 are
even more
substantial,
it is
possible to
get 253 up
to a $20m
TIF value.
If 121B not
used for
253 and
improvements
dont yield
a $20m TIF,
TIF on
Necco
warehouses
would
likely make
up the
difference.
State
Funding
Maximum MassWorks funding
is available because of the
blight eradication and
substantial nature of multiusers, if the BRA owns the
property - which is assumed
for this scenario. (Private
ownership of the property
would reduce MassWorks
potential.)
MassWorks $120m provided to
BRA to help pay for:
1. Acquisition of all properties.
2. Any enviro remediation
required for uses anticipated
and not covered from other
funding (including from the
seller).
3. Stabilization of Necco
warehouses, including exterior
demo (if allowed by Boston
Landmarks Comm), interior
demo and historic
preservation.
4. Construction of a parking
structure, the size to be
determined, with an agreed
upon # of spaces dedicated to
GE use (terms to be
negotiated).
5. Build-out of green space in
the form of public open space.
6. Surface parking if required.
7. Public Helipad development.
8. Access to the dock, to the
Other
Assumptions
253 is a
private lease
deal.
Comments
Multi-tenanting of Necco
Court would be helpful,
like, for example, a
separate innovation
center (which could
General
assumption is utilize Mass Life Science
funding for capital and
that the total
another source of
project cost
public/private funding for
will be in
operations), a GE
excess of
$120m. Costs Museum of Innovation
above $120m which is open to the
public, or the more
are assumed
to be borne by traditional like a
restaurant.
private
tenants,
through
Size of the parking
equity, debt
structure to be
or lease
determined jointly, with
payments.
a consideration for public
parking to meet an
T/I on Necco
undefined MassWorks
would be
standard (there is no
ineligible for
standard, so this is
MassWorks
negotiable); to cover
funding, and
O&M costs, and to meet
would be
general district needs,
performed by including future
building
development of adjacent
owner and
lots.
repaid
through lease Wondering why
payments or
additional parking would
paid directly
be needed for green
by the tenant. space from a public
planning perspective it
Public portion may be more desirable to
maximize green space
of helipad is
and push vehicles into
initial capital
the parking garage.
investment,
future O&M
would require
private
funding.
Scenario #2
Description
253 Summer/
Melcher;
adjacent
Necco Court
warehouse
(one).
Build parking
decks in
warehouse;
helipad.
City
Funding
121B (up to
$20m) or
TIF (up to
$15m) on
253.
If improvements to
253 are
even more
substantial,
it is
possible to
get 253 up
to a $20m
TIF value.
If 121B not
used for
253 and
improvements
dont yield
a $20m TIF,
TIF on
Necco
ware-
State
Funding
MassWorks funding would be
several restricted if the
warehouse is for a single user.
If this was the case, this
scenario pushes the project
back to a $40m Mass Life
Sciences tax credit potential,
with nominal MassWorks
funding to support just the
public aspects of the project,
including streets, sidewalks and
utilities outside of the
warehouse; historic
preservation; the public
helipad, and perhaps some
building stabilization
(depending on the nature of
the work).
If it was for multi-users, with a
majority of the site being for
public use, then the project is
more likely to be MassWorks
eligible, but unlikely to be able
to spend the entire $120m. In
this case, the MassWorks (less
than $80m) and MLSC ($40m)
Other
Assumptions
253 is a
private lease
deal.
Only one
Necco
warehouse
parcel is
purchased,
and not a
larger acreage
which
provides for
additional
public benefit.
General
assumption is
that the total
project cost
will be in
excess of
$120m. Costs
above $120m
are assumed
to be borne by
private
Comments
Multi-tenanting of Necco
would be extremely
helpful to maximize
MassWorks funding
eligibility. Without a
desirable multi-tenant
mix, the building
acquisition cost would
not be MassWorks
eligible.
Is it anticipated that
there is public parking as
part of this scenario?
Is it anticipated that
there would be more
than just parking in the
building? For example,
parking and an
innovation center, both
with an emphasis on the
public side, would make
the project more
MassWorks eligible.
houses
would
likely make
up the
difference.
tenants,
through
equity, debt
or lease
payments.
T/I on Necco
would be
ineligible for
MassWorks
funding, and
would be
performed by
building
owner and
repaid
through lease
payments or
paid directly
by the tenant.
Public portion
of helipad is
initial capital
investment,
future O&M
would require
private
funding.
Scenario #3
Description
253 Summer/
Melcher;
helipad.
(Assume
parking in
basement of
Summer St.
Building,
with
potential for
additional
space, as
needed, in
P&G surface
lot.
Alternative add parking
building on
P&G lot.)
City
Funding
121B (up to
$20m) or
TIF (up to
$15m) on
253.
If improvements to
253 are
even more
substantial,
it is
possible to
get 253 up
to a $20m
TIF value.
The
addition of
parking in
the
building at
253 may
do that.
If 121B not
used for
253 and
improvements
dont yield
a $20m TIF,
TIF on
Necco
warehouses
would
likely make
up the
difference.
State
Funding
A 253 only project with a single
tenant and no public parking is
only eligible for MassWorks
funding on the exterior of the
building footprint - for needs
like sidewalks, utilities and
roadways. The creation of
parking under the building
would potential cause the need
for some roadway
improvements that could be
funded through MassWorks,
for example. Under this
scenario, the $40m MLSC credit
could be available to support
the company in addition to
MassWorks and up to $120m
total, with the company being
able to use the credit for any
expenditure, including on the
project.
The addition of the P&G
surface lot only adds
MassWorks eligibility if enough
of the surface lot is for public
parking. Ownership of the lot,
either private or public, does
not impact the eligibility it
would be the public use that
would. If the surface lot is one
user parking only, it would only
qualify for MassWorks on
exterior elements, like
roadwasys and sidewalks.
The creation of a parking
garage on P&G only adds
MassWorks eligibility if enough
of the garage is for public
parking. Ownership of the lot
and garage on top of it, either
private or public, does not
impact the eligibility it would
Other
Assumptions
253 is a
private lease
deal.
Comments
Multi-tenanting of Necco
Court would be helpful,
like, for example, a
separate innovation
center (which could
General
assumption is utilize Mass Life Science
funding for capital and
that the total
another source of
project cost
public/private funding for
will be in
operations), a GE
excess of
$120m. Costs Museum of Innovation
above $120m which is open to the
public, or the more
are assumed
to be borne by traditional like a
restaurant.
private
tenants,
through
Size of the parking
equity, debt
structure to be
or lease
determined jointly, with
payments.
a consideration for public
parking to meet an
The parking
undefined MassWorks
lot or garage,
standard (there is no
if to be owned standard, so this is
by the BRA, is negotiable); to cover
eligible for a
O&M costs, and to meet
BRA
general district needs,
acquisition
including future
through blight development of adjacent
eradication.
lots.
Otherwise,
the BRA may
Would it not be cost
not be able to prohibitive to put parking
acquire the
in the basement of 253?
property.
One would also think it
would add substantial
time to the eventual
occupancy of the
building.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Yes. Don't see a call 8n number yet for that. The 9 is w GE.
8am is good.
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Frazier, Ricks (EOHED)
<ricks.frazier@massmail.state.ma.us> wrote:
Fine
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 23, 2015, at 11:25 PM, Kennealy, Michael (EOHED)
<Michael.kennealy@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
Works for me too
Mike Kennealy
On Dec 23, 2015, at 11:42 PM, Daniel Koh
<daniel.koh@boston.gov> wrote:
8 AM works for me.
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Ash,
Jay (EOHED)
<jay.ash@massmail.state.ma.us> wrote:
Folks, this is really tedious, with so
many potential variations on each
scenario. Nonetheless, here is a first
draft responding to the three basics of
the scenarios. I think it encompasses
everything, but need to sleep on it now.
Feel free to pick it apart!
Shared with a limited circulation.
Chiefs should decided if they want to
expand the loop now, or wait until the
smaller group has had at it.
Should we do a call at 8 to discuss what
we are saying to them at 9?
-John Barros
Chief of Economic Development
Office of Mayor Martin J. Walsh
6th Floor, Room 603
Boston City Hall, Boston MA 02201
t: 617-635-5729
http://www.cityofboston.gov
SHARE YOUR VISION. SHAPE OUR CITY.
http://imagine.boston.gov/
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Attached is our analysis of the helipad permitting at d6. The process would be similar for a
new helipad in the seaport district, with the possible addition of special port/coastal review
which I am weak on, but of which secretaries Pollack and Beaton would have an excellent
grasp.
As for the kneeling street site, The federal portion has been completed. State and local
permitting remains.
Tom Tinlin reports local permitting is the highest hurdle, as residents in the leather district and
Chinatown are likely to be opposed.
Pre-plum it was expected this could never get through city permitting, but with the city
administration onboard that would be different.
Rob
Rob Garrity
Chief of Staff
MassDOT
857-368-8893 (o)
617-356-4981 (c)
Begin forwarded message:
From: "DeCarlo, Jeffrey (DOT)" <jeffrey.decarlo@dot.state.ma.us>
Date: December 1, 2015 at 11:30:21 AM EST
To: "Boyle, Mark E (MBTA)" <mboyle@mbta.com>, "DeCarlo, Jeffrey (DOT)"
<Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us>
Cc: "Garrity, Rob (DOT)" <Rob.Garrity@dot.state.ma.us>, "Pollack, Stephanie
(DOT)" <Stephanie.Pollack@dot.state.ma.us>
Subject: Heliport Permitting & Preliminary Cost--RE: Helipad
See the attached re: Heliport permitting. The Secretary also asked for a Preliminary
Heliport cost estimate, which is also attached.
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Dear Mark,
It was a real pleasure meeting with you. I appreciate you sharing your knowledge and
expertise.
Let me check on whether any permitting has been completed to date. Ill get back to
you shortly.
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Subject: Helipad
Jeff:
Nice to meet with you last week on our related efforts and goals. I look forward to
working with you and please dont hesitate to contact me if I can be of assistance with
any real estate issues.
Thanks.
Mark
Mark E. Boyle
Assistant General Manager
Interim Assistant Secretary
Real Estate and Asset Development
MBTA/MassDOT
Ten Park Plaza, Suite 5720
Boston, MA 02116
(617) 222-3255
mboyle@mbta.com
_______________________________________________________________________
This email/electronic message, including any attached files, is being sent by the
MBTA. It is solely intended for the recipient(s) and may contain information that
is proprietary, confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure
pursuant to state and federal law. If you have received this message in error or
are not the intended recipient(s), please notify the sender immediately by reply,
and delete all copies of this email/electronic message and any attached files from
your computer. If you are the intended recipient(s), you may use the information
contained in this email/electronic message and any attached files only as
authorized by the MBTA. Any unauthorized use, dissemination, or disclosure of
this email/electronic message and/or its attached files is strictly prohibited.
Date:
updated:
Client:
Project:
7/8/2013
12/1/2015
MassDOT
Kneeland Street Heliport
SUMMARY
Description
Construction
Engineering
TOTAL
$175,432.50
$52,629.75
$228,062.25
$201,767.50
$60,530.25
$262,297.75
$377,200.00
$380,000.00
$113,160.00
$120,000.00
$490,360.00
$500,000.00
TOTALS
Say
Note:
This does not include any HAZMAT mitigation. It was intended that the helipads would be built at grade. It is
expected that all work will be done without breaking the cap over the hazardous material. It was assumed that
the cap was at a depth of 3 feet and the maximum depth of excavation is approximately 2 feet or at least 1 foot
above the cap.
Date:
updated:
Client:
Project:
7/8/2013
12/1/2015
MassDOT
Kneeland Street Heliport
Phase I - Landing Pad & Access Road
MassDOT
HWY No.
FAA Item
No.
Quantity
Engineer's Estimate
Description
Unit Cost
Amount
Unit
Total Cost
125.
P-152.1
130
CY
$50.00
$6,500.00
120.1
P-152.2
Unclassified Excavation
500
CY
$50.00
$25,000.00
405.
P-209.1
350
CY
$80.00
$28,000.00
460.
P-401.1
125
Ton
$175.00
$21,875.00
$70,000.00
476.
P-501.1
200
CY
$350.00
854.016
P-620.1
Pavement Markings
400
SF
$2.00
$800.00
752.
P-905.1
15
CY
$25.00
$375.00
Subtotal
$152,550.00
Contingency (15%)
$22,882.50
CONSTRUCTION
$175,432.50
$52,629.75
TOTAL
$228,062.25
Date:
updated:
Client:
Project:
7/8/2013
12/1/2015
MassDOT
Kneeland Street Heliport
Phase II - Taxi Route and Parking Pads
MassDOT
HWY No.
FAA Item
No.
Quantity
Engineer's Estimate
Description
Unit Cost
Amount
Unit
Total Cost
125.
P-152.1
150
CY
$50.00
$7,500.00
120.1
P-152.2
Unclassified Excavation
610
CY
$50.00
$30,500.00
405.
P-209.1
450
CY
$80.00
$36,000.00
460.
P-401.1
124
Ton
$175.00
$21,700.00
476.
P-501.1
220
CY
$350.00
$77,000.00
854.016
P-620.1
Pavement Markings
500
SF
$2.00
$1,000.00
752.
P-905.1
70
CY
$25.00
$1,750.00
Subtotal
$175,450.00
Contingency (15%)
$26,317.50
CONSTRUCTION
$201,767.50
$60,530.25
TOTAL
$262,297.75
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Potential complications for a helipad in the Seaport could include interference with Logan flight
paths and, if located along the waterfront, the need for a Chapter 91 license which is usually a long
and painful process. If the helipad is on Massport land then there is a statutorily-allowed
workaround in which Massport and the Department of Environmental Protection can use a
streamlined MOU process in lieu of Chapter 91 permitting.
Stephanie
Attached is our analysis of the helipad permitting at d6. The process would be similar for a new
helipad in the seaport district, with the possible addition of special port/coastal review which I am
weak on, but of which secretaries Pollack and Beaton would have an excellent grasp.
As for the kneeling street site, The federal portion has been completed. State and local permitting
remains.
Tom Tinlin reports local permitting is the highest hurdle, as residents in the leather district and
Chinatown are likely to be opposed.
Pre-plum it was expected this could never get through city permitting, but with the city
administration onboard that would be different.
Rob
Rob Garrity
Chief of Staff
MassDOT
857-368-8893 (o)
617-356-4981 (c)
Begin forwarded message:
From: "DeCarlo, Jeffrey (DOT)" <jeffrey.decarlo@dot.state.ma.us>
Date: December 1, 2015 at 11:30:21 AM EST
To: "Boyle, Mark E (MBTA)" <mboyle@mbta.com>, "DeCarlo, Jeffrey (DOT)"
<Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us>
Cc: "Garrity, Rob (DOT)" <Rob.Garrity@dot.state.ma.us>, "Pollack, Stephanie (DOT)"
<Stephanie.Pollack@dot.state.ma.us>
See the attached re: Heliport permitting. The Secretary also asked for a Preliminary
Heliport cost estimate, which is also attached.
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Dear Mark,
It was a real pleasure meeting with you. I appreciate you sharing your knowledge and
expertise.
Let me check on whether any permitting has been completed to date. Ill get back to
you shortly.
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Jeff:
Nice to meet with you last week on our related efforts and goals. I look forward to
working with you and please dont hesitate to contact me if I can be of assistance with
any real estate issues.
Thanks.
Mark
Mark E. Boyle
Assistant General Manager
Interim Assistant Secretary
Real Estate and Asset Development
MBTA/MassDOT
Ten Park Plaza, Suite 5720
Boston, MA 02116
(617) 222-3255
mboyle@mbta.com
_______________________________________________________________________
This email/electronic message, including any attached files, is being sent by the
MBTA. It is solely intended for the recipient(s) and may contain information that
is proprietary, confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure
pursuant to state and federal law. If you have received this message in error or
are not the intended recipient(s), please notify the sender immediately by reply,
and delete all copies of this email/electronic message and any attached files from
your computer. If you are the intended recipient(s), you may use the information
contained in this email/electronic message and any attached files only as
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Steve meeting
1. GE additional thoughts
2. ED Initiative
3. Mass Eye & Ear
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Looping in Mike Kennealy who has had helipad discussions with DOT and Massport in the past.
Potential complications for a helipad in the Seaport could include interference with Logan flight
paths and, if located along the waterfront, the need for a Chapter 91 license which is usually a long
and painful process. If the helipad is on Massport land then there is a statutorily-allowed
workaround in which Massport and the Department of Environmental Protection can use a
streamlined MOU process in lieu of Chapter 91 permitting.
Stephanie
Attached is our analysis of the helipad permitting at d6. The process would be similar for a new
helipad in the seaport district, with the possible addition of special port/coastal review which I am
weak on, but of which secretaries Pollack and Beaton would have an excellent grasp.
As for the kneeling street site, The federal portion has been completed. State and local permitting
remains.
Tom Tinlin reports local permitting is the highest hurdle, as residents in the leather district and
Chinatown are likely to be opposed.
Pre-plum it was expected this could never get through city permitting, but with the city
administration onboard that would be different.
Rob
Rob Garrity
Chief of Staff
MassDOT
857-368-8893 (o)
617-356-4981 (c)
See the attached re: Heliport permitting. The Secretary also asked for a Preliminary
Heliport cost estimate, which is also attached.
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Dear Mark,
It was a real pleasure meeting with you. I appreciate you sharing your knowledge and
expertise.
Let me check on whether any permitting has been completed to date. Ill get back to
you shortly.
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Jeff:
Nice to meet with you last week on our related efforts and goals. I look forward to
working with you and please dont hesitate to contact me if I can be of assistance with
any real estate issues.
Thanks.
Mark
Mark E. Boyle
Assistant General Manager
Interim Assistant Secretary
Real Estate and Asset Development
MBTA/MassDOT
Ten Park Plaza, Suite 5720
Boston, MA 02116
(617) 222-3255
mboyle@mbta.com
_______________________________________________________________________
This email/electronic message, including any attached files, is being sent by the
MBTA. It is solely intended for the recipient(s) and may contain information that
is proprietary, confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure
pursuant to state and federal law. If you have received this message in error or
are not the intended recipient(s), please notify the sender immediately by reply,
and delete all copies of this email/electronic message and any attached files from
your computer. If you are the intended recipient(s), you may use the information
contained in this email/electronic message and any attached files only as
authorized by the MBTA. Any unauthorized use, dissemination, or disclosure of
this email/electronic message and/or its attached files is strictly prohibited.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Attached is our analysis of the helipad permitting at d6. The process would be similar for a new
helipad in the seaport district, with the possible addition of special port/coastal review which I am
weak on, but of which secretaries Pollack and Beaton would have an excellent grasp.
As for the kneeling street site, The federal portion has been completed. State and local permitting
remains.
Tom Tinlin reports local permitting is the highest hurdle, as residents in the leather district and
Chinatown are likely to be opposed.
Pre-plum it was expected this could never get through city permitting, but with the city
administration onboard that would be different.
Rob
Rob Garrity
Chief of Staff
MassDOT
857-368-8893 (o)
617-356-4981 (c)
Begin forwarded message:
From: "DeCarlo, Jeffrey (DOT)" <jeffrey.decarlo@dot.state.ma.us>
Date: December 1, 2015 at 11:30:21 AM EST
To: "Boyle, Mark E (MBTA)" <mboyle@mbta.com>, "DeCarlo, Jeffrey (DOT)"
<Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us>
Cc: "Garrity, Rob (DOT)" <Rob.Garrity@dot.state.ma.us>, "Pollack, Stephanie (DOT)"
<Stephanie.Pollack@dot.state.ma.us>
Subject: Heliport Permitting & Preliminary Cost--RE: Helipad
Dear Secretary, Mark & Rob,
See the attached re: Heliport permitting. The Secretary also asked for a Preliminary
Heliport cost estimate, which is also attached.
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Dear Mark,
It was a real pleasure meeting with you. I appreciate you sharing your knowledge and
expertise.
Let me check on whether any permitting has been completed to date. Ill get back to
you shortly.
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Jeff:
Nice to meet with you last week on our related efforts and goals. I look forward to
working with you and please dont hesitate to contact me if I can be of assistance with
any real estate issues.
Thanks.
Mark
Mark E. Boyle
Assistant General Manager
Interim Assistant Secretary
Real Estate and Asset Development
MBTA/MassDOT
Ten Park Plaza, Suite 5720
Boston, MA 02116
(617) 222-3255
mboyle@mbta.com
_______________________________________________________________________
This email/electronic message, including any attached files, is being sent by the
MBTA. It is solely intended for the recipient(s) and may contain information that
is proprietary, confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure
pursuant to state and federal law. If you have received this message in error or
are not the intended recipient(s), please notify the sender immediately by reply,
and delete all copies of this email/electronic message and any attached files from
your computer. If you are the intended recipient(s), you may use the information
contained in this email/electronic message and any attached files only as
authorized by the MBTA. Any unauthorized use, dissemination, or disclosure of
this email/electronic message and/or its attached files is strictly prohibited.
Date:
updated:
Client:
Project:
7/8/2013
12/1/2015
MassDOT
Kneeland Street Heliport
SUMMARY
Description
Construction
Engineering
TOTAL
$175,432.50
$52,629.75
$228,062.25
$201,767.50
$60,530.25
$262,297.75
$377,200.00
$380,000.00
$113,160.00
$120,000.00
$490,360.00
$500,000.00
TOTALS
Say
Note:
This does not include any HAZMAT mitigation. It was intended that the helipads would be built at grade. It is
expected that all work will be done without breaking the cap over the hazardous material. It was assumed that
the cap was at a depth of 3 feet and the maximum depth of excavation is approximately 2 feet or at least 1 foot
above the cap.
Date:
updated:
Client:
Project:
7/8/2013
12/1/2015
MassDOT
Kneeland Street Heliport
Phase I - Landing Pad & Access Road
MassDOT
HWY No.
FAA Item
No.
Quantity
Engineer's Estimate
Description
Unit Cost
Amount
Unit
Total Cost
125.
P-152.1
130
CY
$50.00
$6,500.00
120.1
P-152.2
Unclassified Excavation
500
CY
$50.00
$25,000.00
405.
P-209.1
350
CY
$80.00
$28,000.00
460.
P-401.1
125
Ton
$175.00
$21,875.00
$70,000.00
476.
P-501.1
200
CY
$350.00
854.016
P-620.1
Pavement Markings
400
SF
$2.00
$800.00
752.
P-905.1
15
CY
$25.00
$375.00
Subtotal
$152,550.00
Contingency (15%)
$22,882.50
CONSTRUCTION
$175,432.50
$52,629.75
TOTAL
$228,062.25
Date:
updated:
Client:
Project:
7/8/2013
12/1/2015
MassDOT
Kneeland Street Heliport
Phase II - Taxi Route and Parking Pads
MassDOT
HWY No.
FAA Item
No.
Quantity
Engineer's Estimate
Description
Unit Cost
Amount
Unit
Total Cost
125.
P-152.1
150
CY
$50.00
$7,500.00
120.1
P-152.2
Unclassified Excavation
610
CY
$50.00
$30,500.00
405.
P-209.1
450
CY
$80.00
$36,000.00
460.
P-401.1
124
Ton
$175.00
$21,700.00
476.
P-501.1
220
CY
$350.00
$77,000.00
854.016
P-620.1
Pavement Markings
500
SF
$2.00
$1,000.00
752.
P-905.1
70
CY
$25.00
$1,750.00
Subtotal
$175,450.00
Contingency (15%)
$26,317.50
CONSTRUCTION
$201,767.50
$60,530.25
TOTAL
$262,297.75
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Looping in Mike Kennealy who has had helipad discussions with DOT and Massport in the past.
Potential complications for a helipad in the Seaport could include interference with Logan flight
paths and, if located along the waterfront, the need for a Chapter 91 license which is usually a long
and painful process. If the helipad is on Massport land then there is a statutorily-allowed
workaround in which Massport and the Department of Environmental Protection can use a
streamlined MOU process in lieu of Chapter 91 permitting.
Stephanie
Attached is our analysis of the helipad permitting at d6. The process would be similar for a new
helipad in the seaport district, with the possible addition of special port/coastal review which I am
weak on, but of which secretaries Pollack and Beaton would have an excellent grasp.
As for the kneeling street site, The federal portion has been completed. State and local permitting
remains.
Tom Tinlin reports local permitting is the highest hurdle, as residents in the leather district and
Chinatown are likely to be opposed.
Pre-plum it was expected this could never get through city permitting, but with the city
administration onboard that would be different.
Rob
Rob Garrity
Chief of Staff
MassDOT
857-368-8893 (o)
617-356-4981 (c)
See the attached re: Heliport permitting. The Secretary also asked for a Preliminary
Heliport cost estimate, which is also attached.
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Dear Mark,
It was a real pleasure meeting with you. I appreciate you sharing your knowledge and
expertise.
Let me check on whether any permitting has been completed to date. Ill get back to
you shortly.
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Jeff:
Nice to meet with you last week on our related efforts and goals. I look forward to
working with you and please dont hesitate to contact me if I can be of assistance with
any real estate issues.
Thanks.
Mark
Mark E. Boyle
Assistant General Manager
Interim Assistant Secretary
Real Estate and Asset Development
MBTA/MassDOT
Ten Park Plaza, Suite 5720
Boston, MA 02116
(617) 222-3255
mboyle@mbta.com
_______________________________________________________________________
This email/electronic message, including any attached files, is being sent by the
MBTA. It is solely intended for the recipient(s) and may contain information that
is proprietary, confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure
pursuant to state and federal law. If you have received this message in error or
are not the intended recipient(s), please notify the sender immediately by reply,
and delete all copies of this email/electronic message and any attached files from
your computer. If you are the intended recipient(s), you may use the information
contained in this email/electronic message and any attached files only as
authorized by the MBTA. Any unauthorized use, dissemination, or disclosure of
this email/electronic message and/or its attached files is strictly prohibited.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Attached is our analysis of the helipad permitting at d6. The process would be similar for a new
helipad in the seaport district, with the possible addition of special port/coastal review which I am
weak on, but of which secretaries Pollack and Beaton would have an excellent grasp.
As for the kneeling street site, The federal portion has been completed. State and local permitting
remains.
Tom Tinlin reports local permitting is the highest hurdle, as residents in the leather district and
Chinatown are likely to be opposed.
Pre-plum it was expected this could never get through city permitting, but with the city
administration onboard that would be different.
Rob
Rob Garrity
Chief of Staff
MassDOT
857-368-8893 (o)
617-356-4981 (c)
Begin forwarded message:
From: "DeCarlo, Jeffrey (DOT)" <jeffrey.decarlo@dot.state.ma.us>
Date: December 1, 2015 at 11:30:21 AM EST
To: "Boyle, Mark E (MBTA)" <mboyle@mbta.com>, "DeCarlo, Jeffrey (DOT)"
<Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us>
Cc: "Garrity, Rob (DOT)" <Rob.Garrity@dot.state.ma.us>, "Pollack, Stephanie (DOT)"
<Stephanie.Pollack@dot.state.ma.us>
Subject: Heliport Permitting & Preliminary Cost--RE: Helipad
Dear Secretary, Mark & Rob,
See the attached re: Heliport permitting. The Secretary also asked for a Preliminary
Heliport cost estimate, which is also attached.
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Dear Mark,
It was a real pleasure meeting with you. I appreciate you sharing your knowledge and
expertise.
Let me check on whether any permitting has been completed to date. Ill get back to
you shortly.
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Jeff:
Nice to meet with you last week on our related efforts and goals. I look forward to
working with you and please dont hesitate to contact me if I can be of assistance with
any real estate issues.
Thanks.
Mark
Mark E. Boyle
Assistant General Manager
Interim Assistant Secretary
Real Estate and Asset Development
MBTA/MassDOT
Ten Park Plaza, Suite 5720
Boston, MA 02116
(617) 222-3255
mboyle@mbta.com
_______________________________________________________________________
This email/electronic message, including any attached files, is being sent by the
MBTA. It is solely intended for the recipient(s) and may contain information that
is proprietary, confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure
pursuant to state and federal law. If you have received this message in error or
are not the intended recipient(s), please notify the sender immediately by reply,
and delete all copies of this email/electronic message and any attached files from
your computer. If you are the intended recipient(s), you may use the information
contained in this email/electronic message and any attached files only as
authorized by the MBTA. Any unauthorized use, dissemination, or disclosure of
this email/electronic message and/or its attached files is strictly prohibited.
Date:
updated:
Client:
Project:
7/8/2013
12/1/2015
MassDOT
Kneeland Street Heliport
SUMMARY
Description
Construction
Engineering
TOTAL
$175,432.50
$52,629.75
$228,062.25
$201,767.50
$60,530.25
$262,297.75
$377,200.00
$380,000.00
$113,160.00
$120,000.00
$490,360.00
$500,000.00
TOTALS
Say
Note:
This does not include any HAZMAT mitigation. It was intended that the helipads would be built at grade. It is
expected that all work will be done without breaking the cap over the hazardous material. It was assumed that
the cap was at a depth of 3 feet and the maximum depth of excavation is approximately 2 feet or at least 1 foot
above the cap.
Date:
updated:
Client:
Project:
7/8/2013
12/1/2015
MassDOT
Kneeland Street Heliport
Phase I - Landing Pad & Access Road
MassDOT
HWY No.
FAA Item
No.
Quantity
Engineer's Estimate
Description
Unit Cost
Amount
Unit
Total Cost
125.
P-152.1
130
CY
$50.00
$6,500.00
120.1
P-152.2
Unclassified Excavation
500
CY
$50.00
$25,000.00
405.
P-209.1
350
CY
$80.00
$28,000.00
460.
P-401.1
125
Ton
$175.00
$21,875.00
$70,000.00
476.
P-501.1
200
CY
$350.00
854.016
P-620.1
Pavement Markings
400
SF
$2.00
$800.00
752.
P-905.1
15
CY
$25.00
$375.00
Subtotal
$152,550.00
Contingency (15%)
$22,882.50
CONSTRUCTION
$175,432.50
$52,629.75
TOTAL
$228,062.25
Date:
updated:
Client:
Project:
7/8/2013
12/1/2015
MassDOT
Kneeland Street Heliport
Phase II - Taxi Route and Parking Pads
MassDOT
HWY No.
FAA Item
No.
Quantity
Engineer's Estimate
Description
Unit Cost
Amount
Unit
Total Cost
125.
P-152.1
150
CY
$50.00
$7,500.00
120.1
P-152.2
Unclassified Excavation
610
CY
$50.00
$30,500.00
405.
P-209.1
450
CY
$80.00
$36,000.00
460.
P-401.1
124
Ton
$175.00
$21,700.00
476.
P-501.1
220
CY
$350.00
$77,000.00
854.016
P-620.1
Pavement Markings
500
SF
$2.00
$1,000.00
752.
P-905.1
70
CY
$25.00
$1,750.00
Subtotal
$175,450.00
Contingency (15%)
$26,317.50
CONSTRUCTION
$201,767.50
$60,530.25
TOTAL
$262,297.75
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Jay passed along this memo to me which is really helpful thank you. Question would same
considerations apply for the properties currently being considered (253 Summer plus adjacent
buildings)? Anything about that site or those buildings that would make a helipad either easier or
more difficult?
Thanks,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Attached is our analysis of the helipad permitting at d6. The process would be similar for a new
helipad in the seaport district, with the possible addition of special port/coastal review which I am
weak on, but of which secretaries Pollack and Beaton would have an excellent grasp.
As for the kneeling street site, The federal portion has been completed. State and local permitting
remains.
Tom Tinlin reports local permitting is the highest hurdle, as residents in the leather district and
Chinatown are likely to be opposed.
Pre-plum it was expected this could never get through city permitting, but with the city
administration onboard that would be different.
Rob
Rob Garrity
Chief of Staff
MassDOT
857-368-8893 (o)
617-356-4981 (c)
Begin forwarded message:
From: "DeCarlo, Jeffrey (DOT)" <jeffrey.decarlo@dot.state.ma.us>
Date: December 1, 2015 at 11:30:21 AM EST
To: "Boyle, Mark E (MBTA)" <mboyle@mbta.com>, "DeCarlo, Jeffrey (DOT)"
<Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us>
Cc: "Garrity, Rob (DOT)" <Rob.Garrity@dot.state.ma.us>, "Pollack, Stephanie (DOT)"
<Stephanie.Pollack@dot.state.ma.us>
Subject: Heliport Permitting & Preliminary Cost--RE: Helipad
Dear Secretary, Mark & Rob,
See the attached re: Heliport permitting. The Secretary also asked for a Preliminary
Heliport cost estimate, which is also attached.
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Dear Mark,
It was a real pleasure meeting with you. I appreciate you sharing your knowledge and
expertise.
Let me check on whether any permitting has been completed to date. Ill get back to
you shortly.
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Jeff:
Nice to meet with you last week on our related efforts and goals. I look forward to
working with you and please dont hesitate to contact me if I can be of assistance with
any real estate issues.
Thanks.
Mark
Mark E. Boyle
Assistant General Manager
Interim Assistant Secretary
Real Estate and Asset Development
MBTA/MassDOT
Ten Park Plaza, Suite 5720
Boston, MA 02116
(617) 222-3255
mboyle@mbta.com
_______________________________________________________________________
This email/electronic message, including any attached files, is being sent by the
MBTA. It is solely intended for the recipient(s) and may contain information that
is proprietary, confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure
pursuant to state and federal law. If you have received this message in error or
are not the intended recipient(s), please notify the sender immediately by reply,
and delete all copies of this email/electronic message and any attached files from
your computer. If you are the intended recipient(s), you may use the information
contained in this email/electronic message and any attached files only as
authorized by the MBTA. Any unauthorized use, dissemination, or disclosure of
this email/electronic message and/or its attached files is strictly prohibited.
Date:
updated:
Client:
Project:
7/8/2013
12/1/2015
MassDOT
Kneeland Street Heliport
SUMMARY
Description
Construction
Engineering
TOTAL
$175,432.50
$52,629.75
$228,062.25
$201,767.50
$60,530.25
$262,297.75
$377,200.00
$380,000.00
$113,160.00
$120,000.00
$490,360.00
$500,000.00
TOTALS
Say
Note:
This does not include any HAZMAT mitigation. It was intended that the helipads would be built at grade. It is
expected that all work will be done without breaking the cap over the hazardous material. It was assumed that
the cap was at a depth of 3 feet and the maximum depth of excavation is approximately 2 feet or at least 1 foot
above the cap.
Date:
updated:
Client:
Project:
7/8/2013
12/1/2015
MassDOT
Kneeland Street Heliport
Phase I - Landing Pad & Access Road
MassDOT
HWY No.
FAA Item
No.
Quantity
Engineer's Estimate
Description
Unit Cost
Amount
Unit
Total Cost
125.
P-152.1
130
CY
$50.00
$6,500.00
120.1
P-152.2
Unclassified Excavation
500
CY
$50.00
$25,000.00
405.
P-209.1
350
CY
$80.00
$28,000.00
460.
P-401.1
125
Ton
$175.00
$21,875.00
$70,000.00
476.
P-501.1
200
CY
$350.00
854.016
P-620.1
Pavement Markings
400
SF
$2.00
$800.00
752.
P-905.1
15
CY
$25.00
$375.00
Subtotal
$152,550.00
Contingency (15%)
$22,882.50
CONSTRUCTION
$175,432.50
$52,629.75
TOTAL
$228,062.25
Date:
updated:
Client:
Project:
7/8/2013
12/1/2015
MassDOT
Kneeland Street Heliport
Phase II - Taxi Route and Parking Pads
MassDOT
HWY No.
FAA Item
No.
Quantity
Engineer's Estimate
Description
Unit Cost
Amount
Unit
Total Cost
125.
P-152.1
150
CY
$50.00
$7,500.00
120.1
P-152.2
Unclassified Excavation
610
CY
$50.00
$30,500.00
405.
P-209.1
450
CY
$80.00
$36,000.00
460.
P-401.1
124
Ton
$175.00
$21,700.00
476.
P-501.1
220
CY
$350.00
$77,000.00
854.016
P-620.1
Pavement Markings
500
SF
$2.00
$1,000.00
752.
P-905.1
70
CY
$25.00
$1,750.00
Subtotal
$175,450.00
Contingency (15%)
$26,317.50
CONSTRUCTION
$201,767.50
$60,530.25
TOTAL
$262,297.75
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Michael.kennealy@MassMail.State.MA.US
Fichter, Katherine (DOT)
Garrity, Rob (DOT)
Re: Heliport Permitting & Preliminary Cost--RE: Helipad
Wednesday, December 30, 2015 9:36:00 AM
Thank you!
Kate
Kate Fichter
Assistant Secretary for Policy Coordination
Massachusetts Department of Transportation
10 Park Plaza, Room 4160
Boston, MA 02116
857-368-8981
katherine.fichter@state.ma.us
Jay passed along this memo to me which is really helpful thank you. Question would
same considerations apply for the properties currently being considered (253 Summer plus
adjacent buildings)? Anything about that site or those buildings that would make a helipad
either easier or more difficult?
Thanks,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Attached is our analysis of the helipad permitting at d6. The process would be similar for a
new helipad in the seaport district, with the possible addition of special port/coastal review
which I am weak on, but of which secretaries Pollack and Beaton would have an excellent
grasp.
As for the kneeling street site, The federal portion has been completed. State and local
permitting remains.
Tom Tinlin reports local permitting is the highest hurdle, as residents in the leather district
and Chinatown are likely to be opposed.
Pre-plum it was expected this could never get through city permitting, but with the city
administration onboard that would be different.
Rob
Rob Garrity
Chief of Staff
MassDOT
857-368-8893 (o)
617-356-4981 (c)
Begin forwarded message:
From: "DeCarlo, Jeffrey (DOT)" <jeffrey.decarlo@dot.state.ma.us>
Date: December 1, 2015 at 11:30:21 AM EST
To: "Boyle, Mark E (MBTA)" <mboyle@mbta.com>, "DeCarlo, Jeffrey (DOT)"
<Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us>
Cc: "Garrity, Rob (DOT)" <Rob.Garrity@dot.state.ma.us>, "Pollack, Stephanie
(DOT)" <Stephanie.Pollack@dot.state.ma.us>
Subject: Heliport Permitting & Preliminary Cost--RE: Helipad
See the attached re: Heliport permitting. The Secretary also asked for a
Preliminary Heliport cost estimate, which is also attached.
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Dear Mark,
It was a real pleasure meeting with you. I appreciate you sharing your
knowledge and expertise.
Let me check on whether any permitting has been completed to date. Ill get
back to you shortly.
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Jeff:
Nice to meet with you last week on our related efforts and goals. I look forward
to working with you and please dont hesitate to contact me if I can be of
assistance with any real estate issues.
Thanks.
Mark
Mark E. Boyle
Assistant General Manager
Interim Assistant Secretary
Real Estate and Asset Development
MBTA/MassDOT
Ten Park Plaza, Suite 5720
Boston, MA 02116
(617) 222-3255
mboyle@mbta.com
_______________________________________________________________________
This email/electronic message, including any attached files, is being sent
by the MBTA. It is solely intended for the recipient(s) and may contain
information that is proprietary, confidential, legally privileged, and/or
exempt from disclosure pursuant to state and federal law. If you have
received this message in error or are not the intended recipient(s), please
notify the sender immediately by reply, and delete all copies of this
email/electronic message and any attached files from your computer. If
you are the intended recipient(s), you may use the information contained
in this email/electronic message and any attached files only as authorized
by the MBTA. Any unauthorized use, dissemination, or disclosure of this
email/electronic message and/or its attached files is strictly prohibited.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Michael.kennealy@MassMail.State.MA.US
Fichter, Katherine (DOT)
Re: Heliport Permitting & Preliminary Cost--RE: Helipad
Wednesday, December 30, 2015 9:51:59 AM
Ok thanks!
Mike Kennealy
On Dec 30, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Fichter, Katherine (DOT) <katherine.fichter@dot.state.ma.us> wrote:
Yes, definitely!
Kate Fichter
Assistant Secretary for Policy Coordination
Massachusetts Department of Transportation
10 Park Plaza, Room 4160
Boston, MA 02116
857-368-8981
katherine.fichter@state.ma.us
On Dec 30, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Fichter, Katherine (DOT) <katherine.fichter@dot.state.ma.us> wrote:
Mike
Thank you!
Kate
Kate Fichter
Assistant Secretary for Policy Coordination
Massachusetts Department of Transportation
10 Park Plaza, Room 4160
Boston, MA 02116
857-368-8981
katherine.fichter@state.ma.us
Jay passed along this memo to me which is really helpful thank you. Question
would same considerations apply for the properties currently being considered (253
Summer plus adjacent buildings)? Anything about that site or those buildings that
would make a helipad either easier or more difficult?
Thanks,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Attached is our analysis of the helipad permitting at d6. The process would be similar
for a new helipad in the seaport district, with the possible addition of special
port/coastal review which I am weak on, but of which secretaries Pollack and Beaton
would have an excellent grasp.
As for the kneeling street site, The federal portion has been completed. State and
local permitting remains.
Tom Tinlin reports local permitting is the highest hurdle, as residents in the leather
district and Chinatown are likely to be opposed.
Pre-plum it was expected this could never get through city permitting, but with the
city administration onboard that would be different.
Rob
Rob Garrity
Chief of Staff
MassDOT
857-368-8893 (o)
617-356-4981 (c)
Begin forwarded message:
From: "DeCarlo, Jeffrey (DOT)" <jeffrey.decarlo@dot.state.ma.us>
Date: December 1, 2015 at 11:30:21 AM EST
To: "Boyle, Mark E (MBTA)" <mboyle@mbta.com>, "DeCarlo, Jeffrey
(DOT)" <Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us>
Cc: "Garrity, Rob (DOT)" <Rob.Garrity@dot.state.ma.us>, "Pollack,
Stephanie (DOT)" <Stephanie.Pollack@dot.state.ma.us>
Subject: Heliport Permitting & Preliminary Cost--RE: Helipad
Dear Secretary, Mark & Rob,
See the attached re: Heliport permitting. The Secretary also asked for a
Preliminary Heliport cost estimate, which is also attached.
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Dear Mark,
It was a real pleasure meeting with you. I appreciate you sharing your
knowledge and expertise.
Let me check on whether any permitting has been completed to date. Ill
get back to you shortly.
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Jeff:
Nice to meet with you last week on our related efforts and goals. I look
forward to working with you and please dont hesitate to contact me if I
can be of assistance with any real estate issues.
Thanks.
Mark
Mark E. Boyle
Assistant General Manager
Interim Assistant Secretary
Real Estate and Asset Development
MBTA/MassDOT
Ten Park Plaza, Suite 5720
Boston, MA 02116
(617) 222-3255
mboyle@mbta.com
_______________________________________________________________________
This email/electronic message, including any attached files, is being
sent by the MBTA. It is solely intended for the recipient(s) and may
contain information that is proprietary, confidential, legally
privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure pursuant to state and
federal law. If you have received this message in error or are not
the intended recipient(s), please notify the sender immediately by
reply, and delete all copies of this email/electronic message and any
attached files from your computer. If you are the intended
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Ann:
Quick update.
We had a good call with Amy (and Scott?) with a focus on the Massport
development option. Happy to provide you an update and/or answer any
questions.
We all will be monitoring email this weekend, so please feel free to reach
out with any questions.
As suggested, we are also holding Monday, January 4 at 4:30 pm for a
check-in call.
We hope that you found the PowerPoint and the concept renderings helpful.
Best to you and your team and Happy New Year!
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 30, 2015, at 5:54 PM, Kadish, Steven (GOV)
<steven.kadish@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
>
> Ann,
>
> On behalf of the Governors Office and the Mayors Office, attached
is the presentation that we had mentioned that helps to describe the
strengths of the Boston area.
> We believe it provides some helpful information.
> Please let us know if you have any comments and/or would like any
further information.
>
> We have appreciated the discussions with you and your team.
> Please let us know if we may help with any other questions that you may
have.
>
> As you had mentioned, the Governor and the Mayor are both interested in
talking with the Chairman.
> Please let us know when next week or soon thereafter this makes sense to
happen.
>
> Very best wishes and Happy New Year!
>
> Steven Kadish and Daniel Koh
>
> <Boston means Innovation Talent Leadership.Dec30.2015.pptx>
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Daniel Koh
Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Ann.Klee@ge.com; Cowan, Mo; john.barros@boston.gov; Ash, Jay (EOHED); Tom Glynn; Lepore, Kristen (ANF)
Re: Boston means Innovation, Talent, Inspiration
Thursday, December 31, 2015 2:42:40 PM
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Steve, Daniel,
Thank you very much for the attached presentation. Its very helpful as Im pulling together
materials for our senior leadership team.
As I mentioned on the call yesterday, we very much appreciate all the effort that you and your
extended teams have put into our discussions over the past few weeks, especially all the work that
has been done over the holidays to address our questions.
Ann,
On behalf of the Governors Office and the Mayors Office, attached is the presentation that we had
mentioned that helps to describe the strengths of the Boston area.
We believe it provides some helpful information.
Please let us know if you have any comments and/or would like any further information.
As you had mentioned, the Governor and the Mayor are both interested in talking with the
Chairman.
Please let us know when next week or soon thereafter this makes sense to happen.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
jay.ash@state.ma.us
Klee, Ann (GE, Corporate)
RE: Boston means Innovation, Talent, Inspiration
Thursday, December 31, 2015 3:06:27 PM
image001.png
Thank you very much for the attached presentation. Its very helpful as Im pulling together
materials for our senior leadership team.
As I mentioned on the call yesterday, we very much appreciate all the effort that you and your
extended teams have put into our discussions over the past few weeks, especially all the work
that has been done over the holidays to address our questions.
Ann,
On behalf of the Governors Office and the Mayors Office, attached is the presentation that
we had mentioned that helps to describe the strengths of the Boston area.
We believe it provides some helpful information.
Please let us know if you have any comments and/or would like any further information.
As you had mentioned, the Governor and the Mayor are both interested in talking with the
Chairman.
Please let us know when next week or soon thereafter this makes sense to happen.
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Daniel Koh
Klee, Ann (GE, Corporate)
Kadish, Steven (GOV); Cowan, Mo; john.barros@boston.gov; Ash, Jay (EOHED); Tom Glynn; Lepore, Kristen
(ANF)
Re: Boston means Innovation, Talent, Inspiration
Thursday, December 31, 2015 3:12:34 PM
image001.png
Ann,
It is our pleasure. Thank you for all the work you have done as well; we realize the magnitude
of the decision for your company and we are appreciative of the ongoing dialogue. Best
wishes for the new year and looking forward to all the things to come in 2016.
Best,
Dan
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Klee, Ann (GE, Corporate) <Ann.Klee@ge.com> wrote:
Steve, Daniel,
Thank you very much for the attached presentation. Its very helpful as Im pulling together
materials for our senior leadership team.
As I mentioned on the call yesterday, we very much appreciate all the effort that you and
your extended teams have put into our discussions over the past few weeks, especially all
the work that has been done over the holidays to address our questions.
Cc: Cowan, Mo; Daniel Koh; john.barros@boston.gov; Ash, Jay (EOHED); Tom Glynn; Lepore, Kristen
(ANF)
Subject: Boston means Innovation, Talent, Inspiration
Ann,
On behalf of the Governors Office and the Mayors Office, attached is the presentation that
we had mentioned that helps to describe the strengths of the Boston area.
We believe it provides some helpful information.
Please let us know if you have any comments and/or would like any further information.
As you had mentioned, the Governor and the Mayor are both interested in talking with the
Chairman.
Please let us know when next week or soon thereafter this makes sense to happen.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
FYIShirley is again inquiring about GE and MA, specifically asking if Guv has spoken to Immelt. I am
referring her back to GE for information regarding their plans.
Tim Buckley
Communications Director
Office of the Governor
617 483-3395
@Tim_BuckleyMA
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Ann, Mo,
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
December 8, 2015
Ann R. Klee
Vice President
Corporate Environment, Health and Safety
General Electric Company
3135 Easton Turnpike
Fairfield, CT 06828
Dear Ms. Klee,
We are pleased to provide some additional thoughts on a partnership between General Electric,
the Commonwealth and the City. We again have endeavored to listen to your feedback and
accordingly have strengthened our proposal and added some additional elements:
1. Public support for your headquarters through a partnership with Massport: Our
December 1 proposal contemplated up to $80 million in public infrastructure improvements
financed by the state. We now propose that Massport be your development partner,
construct a building on a Massport site and, by discounting the construction cost by $80M,
arrive at substantial lease savings for GE. Massport also proposes to build a parking
structure nearby, allowing GE the benefit of proximate parking. Further, Massport has
previously structured lease payments for certain projects that delay or reduce payments in
the early years of the lease while still achieving fair market value overall, and they expect to
work closely and creatively with you.
Massport has a mission to promote economic development and a record of success in
developing its extensive real estate portfolio (including in the Seaport District). Massport
has great experience working with City and state officials, federal regulators and private
parties and in dealing with security and public safety concerns. Attached please see the
specific sites and other information related to this Massport opportunity.
2. Corporate Jets and Helicopters: We understand the importance of immediate access to
your corporate fleet. We now propose:
Parking of one executive jet and one helicopter at Logan Airport for 24/7 access.
A hangar for executive aircraft at Hanscom Airport, with on-call service to Logan.
State financed construction of a new public helipad in Boston (one-site has FAA
approval; other site options can be reviewed).
1
Charles D. Baker
Governor
Martin J. Walsh
Mayor of Boston
2
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Thanks so much. Please let me know if you need anything more from me. You can reach my cell
later tonight if need be. My cell: 617 997 7208.
Mike Kennealy
On Jan 6, 2016, at 4:05 PM, Kadish, Steven (GOV) <steven.kadish@massmail.state.ma.us> wrote:
Mike and Jay you have the edit pen now.
Thx.
Please add something about parking; from the grid: Direct access to public
transportation and convenient, adjacent public parking garage.
I have attached a draft term sheet based on the December 8th letter and the discussion
today. I included up to amounts, but we can delete if you feel that is appropriate. I
dont have much detail on the Current proposal and I didnt know if the transportation
improvements are on top of the funding to be made available in item (2). Please feel
free to edit as you wish and add anything I might have missed. Mike, when you think
this is ready, please forward to the appropriate team at the City for their
review/comments. Thanks!
Regards,
Jennifer
Jennifer Sullivan
Assistant Secretary for Capital Finance
Executive Office for Administration and Finance
State House Room 373
Boston, Massachusetts 02133
P: (617) 727-2040 ext. 35432
Jennifer.F.Sullivan@massmail.state.ma.us
PROJECT PLUM
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS
...an ecosystem thats forward-looking
December 1, 2015
a talented city
a youthful city
| introduction
Martin J. Walsh
Mayor
City of Boston
| introduction
work
innovate
project plum
| introduction
St
a
se
el
Ex
pw
y
Bo
st
on
Meridian St
Piers
Park
Faneuil Hall
Quincy Market
Former BPS HQ
(26 Court Street)
St
n
to
ng
W
as
hi
St
ss
re
Fan Pier
Se
a
SOUTH
STATION
Knee
la
nd S
t
Boston Inner
Harbor
ng
Co
St
se
ha
Av
c
r
tic
Pu
lan
t
A
Boylston St
CHINATOWN
NE Aquarium
FINANCIAL
DISTRICT
DOWNTOWN
CROSSING
Tufts
Medical
Center
Long Wharf
po
rt
FORT POINT
DISTRICT
MassDOT
Building
Seaport
World
Trade
Center
Blv
d
Su
m
me
Parcel A-2
rS
Parcel H
D
World Trade
Center Ave
St
Alb
any
ley
St
Broadw
ay
W4
or
M a ss
Cruiseship
Terminal
SOUTH BOSTON
WATERFRONT
th S
Rd
erke
Dorchester Av
EB
Parcels
D2/D3
Boston
Convention
& Exhibition
Center
tHa
ul
Hera
ld St
Rd
Boston
City Hall
Christopher
Columbus
Park
St
bri
d
Boston
Common
Trem
ont
St
r
ve
no
Ha
LOGAN
INTERNATIONAL
AIRPORT
GOV'T
CENTER
S
con
Bea
Ch
in
To
b
M
au
ric
e
Staniford St
ac S
t
BEACON
HIL
sS
os
Mer
rim
ial
S
n
un n
r T n Tu
e
n a
m h
Su alla
C
Cr
| transportation
project plum
Com
me
rc
EAST BOSTON
l
ne
NORTH
END
St
el
TD Garden
NORTH
STATION
Cam
helipad
rS
nS
ge
The South Boston Waterfront and Innovation District, in particular, has robust water transportation infrastructure in place
with further potential to expand service.
Currently there are water transportation
docks in place at Fan Pier, Fan Pier Cove,
Pier 4, Liberty Wharf, and a new ferry
terminal is designed for the World Trade
Center at Commonwealth Pier.
ne
gto
hanger
in
ash
NW
E
Surrounding Bostons 400 year old downtown peninsula is one of the most extraordinary
concentrations of innovation, business, recreation, and transportation in all of North America.
Bostons downtown boasts an incredible proximity to Logan Airportnonstop flights to 53
international and 76 domestic destinations are never
Su more than 16 minutes away.
m
E Street
Ha
ul
St
St
signage
ton
ng
nni
Be
YOUR HEADQUARTERS
W
ar
re
n
i n St
Br
id
ge
TRANSPORTATION &
INFRASTRUCTURE INCENTIVES
CHARLESTOWN
Br
oa
D Street
dw
ay
1s
project plum
| location map
Br
id
ge
existing building
W
ar
re
n
i n St
This location is within walking distance to four MBTA lines, including the South Station Intermodal
Center with connections to Logan Airport via the Silver Line. It is also minutes from the Mass
Turnpike (route 90) and the primary north-south artery through Boston, the Southeast Expressway
(route 93), as well as the Ted Williams tunnel to Logan Airport. The site is 3 parcels totaling 5.8
acres, with an existing 104,000 square foot office building for renovation.
a
The 11 story building is roughly 160,000 square feet and centrally located with proximity to the
financial district and Massachusetts State House. One of the most historic buildings in Downtown
Boston, 26 Court Street is believed to be the oldest plot of land continuously owned by the City of
Boston. The building has served Boston as a jail, court house, and most recently was home to the
headquarters of Boston Public Schools.
| downtown
To
b
| downtown
in
for renovation
CHARLESTOWN
St
ing
ash
NW
St
a
se
el
Ex
pw
y
Boston
Common
Trem
ont
St
Staniford St
Possible
new headquarters in a highly
St
con
visible location.
bri
d
St
Boston
City Hall
Faneuil Hall
Quincy Market
Christopher
Columbus
Park
Former BPS HQ
(26 Court Street)
in
gt
on
St
St
FINANCIAL
Boylston St
Long Wharf
NE Aquarium
DOWNTOWN
CROSSING
Tufts
Medical
Center
t
eS
as
h
Av
c
r
tic
Pu
lt an
A
SOUTH
STATION
CHINATOWN
Boston Inner
Harbor
FINANCIAL
DISTRICT
St
ss
re
ve
no
Ha
GOV'T
CENTER
ge
Boston
Common
rS
NE Aquarium
ng
Co
sS
os
Long Wharf
Bea
Cr
ac S
t
Cam
con
Bea
Piers
Park
Faneuil Hall
Quincy Market
Christopher
Columbus
Park
Former BPS HQ
(26 Court Street)
St
Possible
TD Garden office space available for high tech
NORTH
NORTH
and
IT infrastructure jobs
ENDand new location
STATION
for innovation lab.
LOGAN
INTERNATIONAL
AIRPORT
BEACON
HIL
Boston
City Hall
ng
to
n
bri
d
MassDOT
el l
nn ne
Tu Tun
r
ne an
m h
Su alla
C
Ha
CENTER
ownership
Cam
W
as
hi
ial
S
EAST BOSTON
St
nS
Com
me
rc
rS
23 minutes
ve
GOV'T by transit
no
ge
gto
City of Boston
rS
ac S
05 minutes
by t car
t
Staniford St
in
ash
NW
ne
ownership
Mer
rim
Meridian St
Su
m
NORTH
END
sS
os
08 minutes by car
20 minutes by transit
3.0 miles
Cr
2.4 miles
TDEligible
Garden
NORTH
STATION to logan
proximity
ial
S
el l
nn ne
Tu Tun
r
ne an
m h
Su alla
C
Br
id
ge
in
To
b
St
proximity to logan
BEACON
HIL
helipad
Bo
st
on
M
au
ric
e
To be determined
Mer
rim
St
W
ar
re
n
i n St
nS
gto
n
nni
Be
Com
me
rc
ton
CHARLESTOWN
helipad
Ch
26 court street
MASSDOT BUILDING
existing building
for renovation
M
au
ric
e
Knee
la
nd S
t
MassDOT
Building
Fan Pier
Se
a
po
FORT POINT
DISTRICT
rt
Blv
d
Su
m
me
rS
World Trad
Meridian St
MassPort
FORT POINT
DISTRICT
Su
m
me
y St
Parcels
D2/D3
M a ss
St
a
el
se
Ch
in
St
W
as
hi
ng
to
n
Ex
pw
y
Bo
st
on
permitting phase
t
eS
Av
c
r
tic
Pu
n
a
l
At
MassDOT
Building
Fan Pier
ownership
Se
a
po
FORT POINT
DISTRICT
rt
Blv
d
EDIC
Su
m
me
Seaport
World
Trade
Center
Parcel A-2
rS
World Trade
Center Ave
St
or
Boston
Convention
tHa
ul
Hera
ld St
nd S
t
Parcel H
D
World Trade
Center Ave
Knee
la
Tufts
Medical
Center
Parcel A-2
rS
FINANCIAL
DISTRICT
SOUTH
STATION
CHINATOWN
Boston Inner
proximity
to ferry access
Harbor
Parcel H
Rd
nd S
t
tB
lvd
22 minutes by transit
NE Aquarium
s
ha
Boylston St
Seaport
World
Trade
Center
10 minutes by car
Long Wharf
Boston
Convention
Parcels
D2/D3
tHa
ul
Knee
la
Tufts
Medical
Center
MassDOT
Building
DOWNTOWN
CROSSING
3.1 miles
or
ea
po
ownership
r
Former BPS HQ
(26 Court Street)
St
Boston
Common
Faneuil Hall
Quincy Market
St
SOUTH
STATION
Boston
City Hall
proximity to logan
Christopher
Columbus
Park
Fan Pier
con
y St
t
eS
Av
c
r
tic
Pu
n
a
l
At
Bea
Ha
St
ss
re
CHINATOWN
Boston Inner
proximity to ferry
access
Harbor
Eligible
rS
ve
no
ng
Co
Boylston St
15 minutes by transit
permitting phase
s
ha
bri
d
BEACON
HIL
FINANCIAL
DISTRICT
St
ss
re
DOWNTOWN
CROSSING
NE Aquarium
ng
Co
W
as
hi
ng
to
n
Boston
Common
11 minutes by car
Long Wharf
Trem
ont
St
St
St
GOV'T
CENTER
Cam
Rd
Former BPS HQ
(26 Court Street)
2.8 miles
helipad
St
con
St
Bea
Faneuil Hall
Quincy Market
ac S
t
ge
ge
BEACON
HIL
Boston
City Hall
proximity to logan
Christopher
Columbus
Park
St
bri
d
Ha
Piers
Park
LOGAN
INTERNATIONA
AIRPORT
Staniford St
Staniford St
GOV'T
CENTER
Cam
Trem
ont
St
Eligible
rS
ve
no
NORTH
END
sS
os
Mer
rim
Cr
sS
os
St
helipad
Cr
ac S
t
ton
ing
St
Piers
Park
ash
NW
ton
ing
ash
NW
Mer
rim
NORTH
END
LOGAN
INTERNATIONAL
TD Garden
NORTH
AIRPORT
STATION
TD Garden
NORTH
STATION
To
b
6 tide street
The Project Site is strategically located within the South Boston Waterfront
District, occupying two
Su
mn
er Summer Street is the major
of the four corners at the intersection of Summer Street and D Street.
St
EAST BOSTON
east-west street in the District, providing a direct connection
to
downtown
Boston. D Street is the
l l
e
n e
major north-south street, linkingCothe
waterfront to the traditional
South Boston neighborhood. The
un nn
r T n Tu
mm
e
n ha
erc
m a
ial 4.9 acres on two
Project Site consists of approximately
parcels owned by Massport.
Su allseparate
St
vacant land
for development
Meridian St
Bo
st
on
St
St
6 TIDE STREET
nS
gto
n
nni
Be
M
au
ric
e
Ex
pw
y
W
ar
re
n
i n St
vacant land
for development
Br
id
ge
St
a
Ch
To
b
M
au
ric
e
CHARLESTOWN
M
W
ar
re
n
i n St
el
se
Br
id
ge
nS
gto
n
nni
Be
in
CHARLESTOWN
M a ss
NE Aquarium
proximity to ferryBoston
access Inner
Fan Pier
po
FORT POINT
DISTRICT
rt
Su
m
me
Seaport
World
Trade
Center
Blv
d
Boston
Ma
ss p
St
a
Ch
Ex
pw
y
Bo
st
on
Meridian St
Boston Inner
proximity to ferry
access
Harbor
t
eS
MassDOT
Building
16 minutes by transit
Fan Pier
Massport
Se
a
po
FORT POINT
DISTRICT
rt
Su
m
me
Seaport
World
Trade
Center
Blv
d
Parcel A-2
rS
World Trade
Center Ave
Parcel H
Hera
ld St
tHa
ul
Parcels
or
ld St
nd S
t
Parcel H
Hera
NE Aquarium
FINANCIAL
DISTRICT
SOUTH
STATION
Knee
la
Tufts
Medical
Center
World Trade
Center Ave
08 minutes by car
Long Wharf
as
v
rch tic A
Pu
n
a
l
At
CHINATOWN
Parcel A-2
rS
el
se
Br
id
ge
in
St
W
as
hi
ng
to
n
DOWNTOWN
CROSSING
2.6 miles
Boston
Convention
Parcels
D2/D3
tHa
ul
nd S
t
MassDOT
Building
Former BPS HQ
(26 Court Street)
Boylston St
Se
a
Faneuil Hall
Quincy Market
or
Knee
la
Trem
ont
St
Massport
proximity to logan
Christopher
Columbus
Park
CHINATOWN
Boston
Common
ownership
Rd
SOUTH
STATION
Boston
City Hall
St
con
Bea
Harbor
Existing water taxi dock
at Liberty Wharf
(0.3 mi.), Pier 4 water taxi (0.3 mi.), Fan Pier
Cove ferry terminal (0.35 mi.)
Ha
St
ss
re
St
ss
re
t
eS
15 minutes by transit
as
v
rch tic A
Pu
lan
t
A
Boylston St
Tufts
Medical
Center
ng
Co
DOWNTOWN
CROSSING
FINANCIAL
DISTRICT
bri
d
BEACON
HIL
St
ng
to
n
St
St
Cam
08 minutes by car
Long Wharf
Eligible
rS
ve
no
ng
Co
Boston
Common
Former BPS HQ
(26 Court Street)
W
as
hi
con
St
Bea
Faneuil Hall
Quincy Market
GOV'T
CENTER
y St
ge
BEACON
HIL
Boston
City Hall
2.6 miles
helipad
St
bri
d
Christopher
Columbus
Park
LOGA
INTER
AIRPO
Piers
Park
Rd
proximity to logan
ac S
t
ge
Cam
Trem
ont
St
r
ve
no
a
H
Staniford St
sS
os
Staniford St
Cr
Eligible
GOV'T
CENTER
Mer
rim
NORTH
END
sS
os
helipad
Cr
Piers
Park
LOGAN
TD Garden
INTERNATIONAL NORTH
STATION
AIRPORT
ial
S
e l
nn ne
Tu Tun
r
ne an
m h
Su alla
C
St
NORTH
END
ac S
t
M
au
ric
e
Ex
pw
y
Bo
st
on
Com
me
rc
St
St
TD Garden
NORTH
STATION
ial
S
n e
un nn
r T n Tu
e
n a
m h
Su alla
C
Similar to A2, this 1.8 acre sites location in the South Boston Waterfront
District delivers great
Su
er
access and amenities. It is also adjacent to the MBTA Silver line withmnthe
potential for
on-site
St
EAST BOSTON
structured parking.
l
ton
ton
Com
me
rc
ing
ing
ash
NW
Located in the heart of the innovation district, this is a 1.2 acre site with terrific transit access.
Adjacent to the MBTA Silver line and a short walk to South Station directly
accesses the airport and
Su
mn
e
rS
greater Boston in a matter of minutes. For commuters, there is available parking
in the planned
Air
t
EAST BOSTON
Rights Garage adjacent to A2 with a possible direct pedestrian connection.
el l
vacant land
for development
ash
NW
Meridian St
congress street
nS
gto
n
nni
Be
To
b
St
a
el
se
Ch
Br
id
ge
To
b
M
au
ric
e
PARCEL H
St
St
Mer
rim
W
ar
re
n
i n St
vacant
for development
CHARLESTOWN
M
A2
W
ar
re
n
i n St
land
ton
ing
nn
Be
in
CHARLESTOWN
St
M a ss
6 Tide Stre
Br
id
ge
To
b
St
M
au
ric
e
W
ar
re
n
i n St
ton
ng
nni
Be
in
CHARLESTOWN
Meridian St
St
St
a
el
se
St
Bo
st
on
Ex
pw
y
M
au
ric
e
Meridian St
St
AIRPORT
S
con
Bea
n
to
ng
Trem
ont
St
2.6 miles
Longminutes
Wharf
08
by car
MassDOT
Building
proximity to ferry
or
tB
lvd
access
FORT POINT
Seaport
World
Trade
Center
Liberty
Wharf
World Trade
Parcel H
Center
Ave Center Authority
Massachusetts
Convention
ownership
Rd
St
Massport
FORT POINT
DISTRICT
rt
Blv
d
Su
m
me
Seaport
World
Trade
Center
EB
erke
Parcel A-2
rS
Parcel H
tHa
ul
or
Parcels
D2/D3
M a ss
M a ss
Cruiseship
Terminal
SOUTH BOSTON
WATERFRONT
th S
Boston
Convention
& Exhibition
St
Broadw
ay
W4
Hera
ld St
ley
Parcels
D2/D3
Boston
Convention
& Exhibition
Center
St
po
or
ld St
Se
a
tHa
ul
Hera
World Trade
Center Ave
y St
ap
Rd
nd S
t
E Street
Ha
ul
Knee
la
nd S
t
Fan Pier
10 minutes by car
Alb
any
CHINATOWN
Knee
la
Tufts
Medical
Center
Fan Pier
Rd
St
W
as
hi
ng
to
n
SOUTH
STATION
3.0 miles
ownership
St
St
ss
re
St
se
ha
Av
c
r
tic
Pu
lt an
A
SOUTH
STATION
CHINATOWN
ng
Co
Boylston St
Harbor
proximity to logan
t
eS
Av
c
r
tic
Pu
lt an
A
Boylston St
Eligible
s
ha
Dorchester Av
St
Faneuil Hall
Quincy Market
DOWNTOWN
CROSSING
St
ss
re
proximity to logan
Christopher
Columbus
Park
Former BPS HQ 15
NEminutes
Aquarium by transit
Boston Inner
(26 Court Street)
DOWNTOWN
CROSSING
Tufts
Medical
Center
r
ve
no
Boston Inner
Harbor
helipad
FINANCIAL
DISTRICT
ng
Co
Ha
Boston
City Hall
St
Boston
Common
Piers
Park
Boston
Common
Eligible
S
HIL
St
Piers
Park
W
as
hi
sS
os
Staniford St
Cr
bri
d
ge
con
Bea
vacant land
for development
helipad
GOV'T
CENTER
BEACON
HIL
NORTH
END
St
NORTH
END
ac S
t
Cam
Trem
ont
St
ge
TD Garden
NORTH
STATION
Mer
rim
ial
S
e
nn ne
Tu Tun
r
ne an
m h
Su alla
C
el l
nn ne
Tu Tun
r
ne an
m h
Su alla
C
sS
os
ton
Com
me
rc
TD Garden
NORTH
STATION
EAST BOSTO
Cr
ing
ash
NW
Located in the South Boston Waterfront District, this site has the capacity for a 150,000
square foot
Su
m
er
office building with parking provided in the adjacent Massport Air Rights Garage. nThe
site
is alsoEAST BOSTON
St
adjacent to the MBTA Silver line station.
l l
ial
S
vacant land
for development
St
Com
me
rc
rS
To
b
in
n
Be
ton
W
ar
re
n
i n St
Ch
nin
ne
ing
CHARLESTOWN
t
nS
gto
ash
NW
Br
id
ge
Su
m
Br
oa
D Street
dw
ay
1s
DEPARTMENT
NAME
Governors Office
Mayors Office
| task force
Boston is the worlds most sustainable source of exceptional talent. We are home to the
best institutions and amazing businesses; the future of robotics, life sciences, and energy are
developed here.
project plum
| innovation lab
YOUR HOME
project plums concierge relocation services
transportation
| your home
The City of Bostons Boston Home Center would be able to support Project Plum employees
seeking homeownership or rentals in Boston through the following incentives:
The City of Bostons Boston Home Center (BHC) will
work with Project Plum to create a homebuying match loan program. The program will work
with the existing BHC loan program to hold a Homebuying 101 (HB101) course at Project
Plum headquarters where graduates are eligible for between 3% and 5% for down payment
and closing cost assistance from the BHC loan program. Loans are zero interest deferred
loans that are forgivable and become a grant if the homeowner lives in Boston for 10 years.
boston attractions
| homeowner support
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
FYI.
Thought this article would be of interest.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-07/here-are-the-mostinnovative-states-in-america
Michelle Jamriskomljamrisko
Wei Lu
Kristen J. Sabella
Deputy Director of Policy & Communications
Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development
E: Kristen.j.Sabella@state.ma.us
P: 617-788-3604
C: 617-352-8437
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Digital Health:
Boston Globe:Massachusetts launches digital health hub
BBJ:State targets 'digital health' as latest growth frontier for Massachusetts economy
MBTA:
Boston Globe:MBTA eyes discounts for low-income riders in the future
Commonwealth Mag:A Beacon Hill switcheroo: How the T fare cap went from 5% to 10%
Concord Monitor:Commuters lament MBTA delays as schedule change looms
DCF:
WGBH:Greater Boston: Rachelle Bond Attorney Talks New Allegations In Baby Doe
Case[VIDEO]
Opioid Addiction:
CNHI:Advocates warn against drug-based treatment for addiction
Other:
Boston Globe:For Charlie Baker, the hardest part may be ahead
News:
Boston Globe:
State acts on simultaneous surgeries
Boston Herald:
Board has to hire 3 to classify offenders
SHNS:
Massport wants to add 5,000 parking spots
AP:
Massachusetts tax collections top $2.4 billion for December
Bloomberg:
Massachusetts, California take first, second place as most innovative states in 2015
Boston.com:
Mass. House votes to repeal law that suspended drivers licenses for drug crimes
Commonwealth Mag:
Opinion: Community health centers have been ahead of the curve
WGBH:
Greater Boston: Looking Ahead To Beacon Hills Agenda In 2016[VIDEO]
Globe Publisher John Henry Dismissed Internal Warnings That New Delivery System Might Fail
Fox 25:
Undocumented minors crossing border alone to be housed at military bases[VIDEO]
Mass court decision allows for sex offenders to challenge classification[VIDEO]
WCVB:
5 injured in explosion at chemical plant[VIDEO]
WHDH:
NBC to pull the plug on Ansins WHDH-TV
Springfield Repub:
Massachusetts schools ranked best in nation
Hampden County Sheriff's Department lauds 36-percent drop in jail population in last decade;
Sheriff Michael Ashe aims to reduce further
Lowell Sun:
Sex-offender ruling blasted by advocates
Lawrence Eagle-Trib:
Editorial: Brutal child abusers should remain in prison
Quincy Patriot-Ledger:
Editorial: State Supreme Court was right on protecting foster children
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Mike---good morning---can you please send me office/cell #s for Sec. Ash, yourself, Kadish, and
Povich? Filling in my internal comms plan. Thnx. Jim
James McGaugh
Executive Manager, Government Affairs & Policy
General Electric
1100 Technology Park Drive
Billerica, MA 01821
T. 617-285-2297
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Jay Ash
Office (617) 788-3650
Cell (617) 680-0013
Mike Kennealy
Office (617) 788-3640
Cell (617) 634-4762
Steve Kadish
Office (617) 725-4000
Cell (617) 483-3426
Lon Povich
Office (617) 725-4030
Cell (617) 483-3429
Best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Mike---good morning---can you please send me office/cell #s for Sec. Ash, yourself, Kadish, and
Povich? Filling in my internal comms plan. Thnx. Jim
James McGaugh
Executive Manager, Government Affairs & Policy
General Electric
1100 Technology Park Drive
Billerica, MA 01821
T. 617-285-2297
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Michael.kennealy@MassMail.State.MA.US
Jim McGaugh; Timothy Buckley
Connecting you
Monday, January 11, 2016 4:20:21 PM
Jim, Tim - connecting you over email. Jim, do you want to call Tim to
discuss plan? Let me know if I can do anything else here.
Thanks,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
My note for today for those that would be interested in moving to Boston. Check out the video!
FYI.
In todays Boston Globe.
The imbedded GE video is terrific!!!
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Gov press office is looking for incentive comps on Mass. deals. Do we know all-in values of incentives in previous
substantial commitments? Evergreen, etc.
Sent from my iPhone
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Hi Paul, we started coming up with a list in early December on this - this is what we found. There just haven't been
that many big deals from EDIP or MLSC. Dont know about CEC.
Bristol Meyers
$34 MM infrastructure + $33 MM tax credit = $67 MM
350 jobs
$191K/job
Liberty Mutual
$22.5 MM EDIP
600 jobs
$37.5K/job
Shire
$21 MM MLSC tax credits
520 jobs
$40K/job
Biogen
$16.5 MM MLSC tax credits
755 jobs
$22K/job
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
-----Original Message----From: McMorrow, Paul (EOHED)
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 2:38 PM
To: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED) <Michael.kennealy@MassMail.State.MA.US>; Frazier, Ricks (EOHED)
<ricks.frazier@MassMail.State.MA.US>
Subject: Deal comps
Gov press office is looking for incentive comps on Mass. deals. Do we know all-in values of incentives in previous
substantial commitments? Evergreen, etc.
Sent from my iPhone
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
John Barros
Ash, Jay (SEA)
Economic Analysis
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 9:09:25 AM
Plum EIA 2016-01-12.docx
Memo
To: Mayors Office of Economic Development
From: Jonathan Lee, Research Division, BRA
Date: January 12, 2016
Subject: Potential Impacts of Project Plum Additional Scenario [DRAFT]
The Research Division analyzed an additional scenario to evaluate the long-term economic and fiscal
impacts of Project Plum on the city of Boston and the Commonwealth. These results are strictly based
on the job and income impacts, and do not account for any economic incentives. Therefore the results
represent sketch level economic and fiscal impacts. This additional scenario is based on the assumptions
below provided by the Mayors Office of Economic Development:
The impact analysis was performed using the BRA Research Divisions REMI model that can capture both
local and statewide economic impacts. The results of the analysis are provided in the summary table
below:
Direct Jobs
Indirect Jobs
Total Jobs
Annual
Income
(millions $)
Annual Fiscal
Impact
(millions $)
Boston
600
590
1,190
$220
$0.01
Massachusetts
600
1,840
2,440
$325
$20.9
The results suggest that bringing these operations to Boston will have a positive economic effect on
Boston, and a larger impact statewide. The total impact for the Commonwealth will be roughly twice
that for Boston, despite Boston hosting the new company. These indirect jobs are created as a result of
the income effect (additional consumer spending by new residents of the Commonwealth on homes,
goods, and services) and the supplier effect (local industries increasing production to serve Project
Plums new Boston-based offices). Lastly, the Commonwealth will also have an opportunity to collect
approximately $20.9 million in additional income and sales tax annually if the company were to move to
the Commonwealth. For Boston, additional revenues would result from increases in property tax and
city meals tax revenues.
The impacts presented above are primarily driven by high wages attributed to the management
positions, which is $253,720 more than the management industry average in Boston and $330,920 more
than the average annual wage in Boston. 1 If the company were paying the industry average, the income
impact for Boston will drop from $220 million to $152 million, representing a 31% reduction. Similarly
for the state, this would be a reduction of $105 million in total income, a difference of 32%.
The average annual wage for jobs in Boston is $69,080 across all industries, and $146,280 for the management
industry. Source: Massachusetts Department of Labor & Workforce Development, Occupational Employment
Statistics, All Occupations, Annual Income, May 2014
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Doug Banks
Ash, Jay (EOHED)
GE
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 10:34:05 AM
Jay -
Is it true that they're announcing tomorrow that Boston will be its new global hq?
Don't need your attribution...just confirmation.
Thanks,
Doug
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
BostonGlobe.com
Frazier, Ricks (EOHED)
Breaking News Alert: GE said to pick Boston for global headquarters
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 10:34:06 AM
BREAKING NEWS
General Electric will announce tomorrow that it has selected Boston for global
headquarters, according to an official familiar with the process.
Company executives called the governor and mayor separately Wednesday
morning, as well as their staffs, to say a formal announcement will come Thursday.
Like Us Follow Us
You received this message because you signed up for Breaking News Alerts.
Copyright 2016 The Boston Globe, All rights reserved.
Our mailing address is:
The Boston Globe
135 William T Morrissey Blvd
Boston, MA 02125
Add us to your address book
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Cupelo, Donna C
Ash, Jay (EOHED)
FW: [E] Breaking News Alert: GE said to pick Boston for global headquarters
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 10:36:41 AM
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
AWESOME!!!!
Donna Cupelo
Verizon New England
125 High Street Oliver 7
Boston, MA 02110
O 6177438800 | M 4014479444
donna.c.cupelo@verizon.com
BREAKING NEWS
General Electric will announce tomorrow that it has selected Boston for global
headquarters, according to an official familiar with the process.
Like Us Follow Us
You received this message because you signed up for Breaking News Alerts.
Copyright 2016 The Boston Globe, All rights reserved.
Our mailing address is:
The Boston Globe
135 William T Morrissey Blvd
Boston, MA 02125
Add us to your address book
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Liz Pujolas
Jay Ash (jay.ash@state.ma.us)
congratulations on GE
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 10:40:19 AM
Assume the Globe is always accurate good for MA and good for you! - Liz
Liz Pujolas
Public Policy & State Government Affairs (New England, NY, PR)
Biogen | 225 Binney St |Cambridge, MA | 02142
Mail: 9 Bellaire Rd Boston MA 02132
Email: Liz.pujolas@biogen.com | Mobile: 617 780 9133
www.biogen.com
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Dan O"Connell
jay.ash@massmail.state.ma.us; Tom Glynn
GE
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 10:51:31 AM
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
John Smolak
"Ash, Jay (EOHED)"
Congratulations on GE!
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 10:55:05 AM
Hi Jay:
Congratulations on GE!
If the stories are true, what a coup!
Regards,
John
John T. Smolak, Esq.
Smolak & Vaughan LLP
East Mill
21 High Street, Suite 301
North Andover, Massachusetts 01845
Tel. 978.327.5220 (Main)
Tel. 978.327.5215 (Direct)
Fax 978.327.5219
E-Mail: jsmolak@SmolakVaughan.com
Web: www.SmolakVaughan.com
BOSTON General Electric plans to announce Thursday that they are moving company headquarters to
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Chmura, Tom
Ash, Jay (EOHED) (jay.ash@MassMail.State.MA.US)
Congratulations!
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 11:09:46 AM
Tom
Tom Chmura
Vice President for Economic Development
University of Massachusetts
Office of the President
One Beacon Street, Floor 31
Boston, MA 02108
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
WOW!!!!
Best
Mark
The company began looking to leave Fairfield, Conn., last year after state
legislators threatened to raise corporate taxes.
By Jon Chesto GLOBE STAFF JANUARY 13, 2016
General Electric Co., one of the most storied names in corporate America, will relocate is global headquarters to Boston,
according to an official familiar with the process.
Company executives called the governor and mayor separately Wednesday morning, as well as their staffs, to say a
formal announcement will come Thursday.
The decision marks the end of a high-stakes competition to woo GE from its longtime campus in suburban Connecticut,
besting New York, Providence, and other cities, and further solidifies the regions reputation as a magnet for
innovation.
Its a major victory for Governor Charlie Baker and Mayor Martin J. Walsh, whose aides worked closely together for
several months to lure GE to a city that has seen many of its biggest companies swallowed up by out-of-town buyers,
and a state that has labored hard to shed the Taxachusetts label pinned on it during the 1970s.
Terms of the deal, including the exact location of the headquarters, were not immediately available.
At nearly $150 billion a year in revenue, GE ranks eighth on the Fortune 500 and would be far and away the largest
publicly traded company based in Massachusetts. Its Connecticut headquarters employs about 800 people.
Shirley Leung of the Globe Staff contributed to this report. Jon Chesto can be reached atjon.chesto@globe.com. Follow him on
Twitter@jonchesto.
General Electric Co. will announce that it will move its worldwide headquarters from Connecticut to Boston, according to a report in The Boston Globe.
********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the
system manager at postmaster at dor.state.ma.us. **********************************************************************
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Mark Gallagher
jay.ash@state.ma.us; Kennealy, Michael (SEA) (michael.kennealy@state.ma.us); steven.kadish@state.ma.us; McMorrow, Paul (SEA)
Christopher R. Anderson
FW: Breaking News: Report: GE will move worldwide HQ to Boston
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 11:27:13 AM
Jay/Mike/Steve- Fantastic news and fantastic work by you guys!! Let us know how we can be helpful in welcoming
them and/or highlighting the impact and significance of this decision.
Mark
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
All: We are not confirming anything at this time. Until this done, it is not done.
Summary of Incentives
General Electric Company Headquarters Relocation
To the City of Boston, Massachusetts
January 13, 2016
This document (the Summary) summarizes the principal terms of incentives offered by
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts (the Commonwealth or Massachusetts) and the City
of Boston, Massachusetts (the City or Boston) as of the above-captioned date, in connection
with the proposed relocation of the General Electric Company (the Company) world
headquarters to Boston. The Summary reflects the good faith discussions of the Commonwealth,
the City and the Company. No other legally binding obligations will be created until definitive
agreements are executed and delivered by the appropriate parties. The Summary shall be
governed in all respects by the laws of the Commonwealth and federal law.
Material Terms:
1. Commonwealth
Direct Economic
Development
Incentives
The City has offered direct local property tax relief to the Company
in an amount up to $25 million, to be established by agreement
upon determination of several factors, including without limitation:
siting of headquarters, size and type of facility and number of jobs
created, and entity-type of applicable real property owner. If the
Company occupies any properties owned or leased by Boston
Redevelopment Authority, for a lease term of up to 20 years, the
Company shall be responsible for only annual operating expenses,
property taxes not abated or subject to a PILOT agreement, and
interior renovations costs.
3. Workforce Training
Grants
4. Innovation Center
5. Corporate Air
Access
6. Coordinated
Permitting
7. Local
Transportation
Improvements
9. Concierge
Relocation
Services
Sincerely,
_______________________________
Charles D. Baker
Governor
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_______________________________
Martin J. Walsh
Mayor
City of Boston
On behalf of the Company, I hereby accept the offer of incentives in the Summary and
announce the intention of the Company to relocate its world headquarters to Boston on or about
[date].
_______________________________
Jeffrey R. Immelt
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
General Electric Company
Acknowledged and accepted this _____th day of January, 2016
4
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Bryan Jamele
Ash, Jay (SEA)
MACP quote
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 11:46:41 AM
Jay,
Per your request to Dan, please find a quote from Bill Swanson on GE:
"GEs move to Boston reinforces our advantagesan incredibly skilled talent pool, world-class universities
and a thriving and innovative tech industry. The Massachusetts Competitive Partnership welcomes GE to our
state and we look forward to working with them as we continue to focus on the competitiveness of
Massachusetts."
I should have a quote from Jay Hooley over to you shortly as well.
Bryan
-____________________________________
Bryan Jamele
Executive Vice President
Massachusetts Competitive Partnership
535 Boylston Street, Top Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
617.236.4099 (Main)
617.236.1337 (Fax)
bjamele@masscompetes.org
www.masscompetes.org
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
JD Chesloff
Ash, Jay (EOHED)
GE
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 12:20:15 PM
JD Chesloff
Executive Director
Massachusetts Business Roundtable
141 Tremont Street, 5th Floor
Boston, MA 02111
617-728-0881
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Bryan Jamele
Ash, Jay (SEA)
MACP Quote - Jay Hooley
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 12:28:28 PM
Jay,
Please find a quote from Jay Hooley below:
"Locating in Boston is an important strategic move for GE and a terrific development for our city. Bostons
strong leadership in innovation, technology and healthcare provide a great environment for GE as it
advances its next generation of products and solutions."
Bryan
-____________________________________
Bryan Jamele
Executive Vice President
Massachusetts Competitive Partnership
535 Boylston Street, Top Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
617.236.4099 (Main)
617.236.1337 (Fax)
bjamele@masscompetes.org
www.masscompetes.org
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
-____________________________________
Bryan Jamele
Executive Vice President
Massachusetts Competitive Partnership
535 Boylston Street, Top Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
617.236.4099 (Main)
617.236.1337 (Fax)
bjamele@masscompetes.org
www.masscompetes.org
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
I should have a quote from Jay Hooley over to you shortly as well.
Bryan
-____________________________________
Bryan Jamele
Executive Vice President
Massachusetts Competitive Partnership
535 Boylston Street, Top Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
617.236.4099 (Main)
617.236.1337 (Fax)
bjamele@masscompetes.org
www.masscompetes.org
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
I should have a quote from Jay Hooley over to you shortly as well.
Bryan
-____________________________________
Bryan Jamele
Executive Vice President
Massachusetts Competitive Partnership
535 Boylston Street, Top Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
617.236.4099 (Main)
617.236.1337 (Fax)
bjamele@masscompetes.org
www.masscompetes.org
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Pamela Goldberg
Ash, Jay (SEA) (jay.ash@state.ma.us)
katie.stebbins@state.ma.us
Congratulations
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 1:02:22 PM
image001.png
on getting GE to locate their headquarters here. That is a win for all of us.
Best,
Pamela
Pamela W. Goldberg
Chief Executive Officer
Massachusetts Technology Collaborative
2 Center Plaza, Suite 200
Boston, MA 02108
617-371-3999 x200
www.masstech.org
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Scott Bailey
Ash, Jay (SEA)
Globe Article about GE
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 2:00:50 PM
Jay,
Congratulations on this great win.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2016/01/13/general-electric-will-announcetomorrow-that-has-selected-boston-for-global-headquarters-according-official-familiar-withprocess/ZYZSu7GorfVTRXM2ZIaabJ/story.html
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
BOSTON Governor Charlie Baker and Mayor Martin J. Walsh today celebrated
General Electric's decision to relocate their world headquarters to Boston to take
advantage of Boston and the Commonwealth's innovative and competitive economy
and access to human capital and world-class educational institutions. General Electric
will bring approximately 800 high-paying jobs to Boston with this move.
"General Electric's choice to move to Boston is the result of the city's willingness and
excitement to work creatively and collaboratively to bring positive activity to our local
economy and continue to grow our industries," said Mayor Walsh. "Boston is
delighted and honored to welcome General Electric and its employees to our
community and we are confident that this is the start of a strong partnership."
Bringing General Electric's operations to the Seaport District will cement the company
as an anchor in the city's innovation industry.The Commonwealth offered incentives
up to $120 million through grants and other programs and up to $25 million was
offered from the city of Boston in property tax relief. Additional incentives offered to
General Electric include:
$1 million in grants for workforce training;
Up to $5 million for an innovation center to forge connections between GE,
innovators from Massachusetts research institutions and the higher
education community;
Commitment to existing local transportation improvements in the Seaport
District;
Appointment of a joint relocation team to ease the transition for employees
moving to Boston;
###
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Mark
<image001.jpg>
t: 781.890.6482 | m: 617.347.1917 | mark@mhtc.org
Reservoir Woods | 850 Winter Street | Waltham | MA | 02451-1420
www.mhtc.org
General Electric Co. will announce that it will move its worldwide headquarters from Connecticut to Boston, according to a report in The Boston Globe.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Williams, Grant W.
Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Ash, Jay (EOHED)
Congratulations
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 2:28:23 PM
Folks,
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2016/01/13/general-electric-will-announce-tomorrowthat-has-selected-boston-for-global-headquarters-according-official-familiar-withprocess/ZYZSu7GorfVTRXM2ZIaabJ/story.html
Yehuda Yaakov
Consul General
@CGYehuda
(617) 535-0201
http://boston.mfa.gov.il
Save a tree. Don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary.
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Thanks Mark!
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Mark
General Electric Co. will announce that it will move its worldwide headquarters from Connecticut
to Boston, according to a report in The Boston Globe.
Read the full story
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Thanks Mark!
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Mark
General Electric Co. will announce that it will move its worldwide headquarters from Connecticut
to Boston, according to a report in The Boston Globe.
Read the full story
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Thanks Mark!
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Best
Mark
The company began looking to leave Fairfield, Conn., last year after state
General Electric Co., one of the most storied names in corporate America, will relocate is global headquarters to Boston,
according to an official familiar with the process.
Company executives called the governor and mayor separately Wednesday morning, as well as their staffs, to say a
formal announcement will come Thursday.
The decision marks the end of a high-stakes competition to woo GE from its longtime campus in suburban Connecticut,
besting New York, Providence, and other cities, and further solidifies the regions reputation as a magnet for
innovation.
Its a major victory for Governor Charlie Baker and Mayor Martin J. Walsh, whose aides worked closely together for
several months to lure GE to a city that has seen many of its biggest companies swallowed up by out-of-town buyers,
and a state that has labored hard to shed the Taxachusetts label pinned on it during the 1970s.
Terms of the deal, including the exact location of the headquarters, were not immediately available.
At nearly $150 billion a year in revenue, GE ranks eighth on the Fortune 500 and would be far and away the largest
publicly traded company based in Massachusetts. Its Connecticut headquarters employs about 800 people.
Shirley Leung of the Globe Staff contributed to this report. Jon Chesto can be reached atjon.chesto@globe.com. Follow him on
Twitter@jonchesto.
********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the
system manager at postmaster at dor.state.ma.us. **********************************************************************
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Thanks Grant!
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Folks,
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Baker said he and Walsh assembled a task force that included Economic Development Secretary
Jay Ash, Administration and Finance Secretary Kristen Lepore and officials from Massport, his
office and City Hall to work with GE beginning at the end of the summer.
Associated Industries of Massachusetts President Richard Lord said Baker and Walsh hosted a
dinner on a Monday night in September at Tresca in the North End for GE's site selection team.
Lord, Ash and representatives from EMC and State Street Corporation also attended the dinner.
Baker on Wednesday said GE would be a "tremendous part of the growing innovation economy"
in Massachusetts and send a signal to other companies that the state is a good place to do
business.
"We're talking about a Fortune 10 company, the 8th largest corporation in the United States and a
real leader in what I would describe as, sort of, the internet of things and the movement toward
creating smart machines," Baker said. "This is a huge win for the city of Boston, a huge win for
Massachusetts and the indirect-direct spillover from this will be felt by this economy and this
community for years to come."
The governor described the incentives as "pretty much the same sort of thing" made available to
other companies periodically looking to expand or grow in Massachusetts, including tax breaks
and grants for infrastructure and capital support. He said some of the incentives will depend upon
the site GE selects in the Seaport district.
The company plans to sell its offices in Fairfield, Conn. and at 30 Rockefeller Plaza in New York
City to help offset the cost of the move, which will begin over the summer.
Though an exact location has yet to be chosen, the company said it will have 800 employees in
the Seaport District of Boston, including 200 corporate staff and 600 digital industrial product
managers, designers and developers. Employees will move to a temporary location in Boston
starting this summer, and the transition will be completed in stages by 2018.
General Electric plans a public briefing with government, business and community leaders on
Feb. 18 to discuss the move.
In its announcement, General Electric noted spending in Massachusetts on research and
development, the state's "technologically-fluent workforce" and its status as home to 55 colleges
and universities.
"'Boston lands new @generalelectric headquarters.' Proof that investments in #HigherEd and
innovation pay dividends," Sen. Eileen Donoghue, of Lowell, wrote on Twitter.
Massachusetts High Technology Council President Chris Anderson said General Electric will be
an "impact player" in the state's policy, civic, educational and philanthropic life.
"GE's selection of Boston reinforces the limitless opportunities for economic growth that are
available to us when business and political leaders work together to reinforce our
Commonwealth's strengths and to address our competitive challenges," Anderson said. "
The addition of its global headquarters in Boston will expand General Electric's already growing
footprint in Massachusetts, which includes nearly 5,000 employees in its aviation, oil and gas and
energy management businesses. The company moved its life sciences headquarters to
Marlborough in 2014, and last year announced that its energy services start-up - Current - would
be based in Boston.
"GE's move brings a host of benefits to the Massachusetts economy, from top-level jobs to
innovation to an unmatched global market presence. AIM and its 4,500 member employers
welcome GE headquarters to the commonwealth and congratulate the Baker and Walsh
administrations for recognizing that taxes, work force and other elements of the business climate
really matter in corporate location decisions," Lord said in a statement.
Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce President James Rooney said the development would
carry benefits beyond job creation and economic development in the neighborhood.
"Bringing an anchor institution like GE to Boston is fundamental for spurring our innovation
ecosystem, as established global companies provide the type of skills training and early
development for startup companies that help them thrive in the long run. Additionally, big
companies increase our ability to not only generate talented minds, but to keep them in Boston
where they belong," Rooney said.
-END01/13/2016
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Michelle McGee
Ash, Jay (EOHED)
FW: REGION"S APPEAL, INCENTIVES HELPED LURE GENERAL ELECTRIC TO BOSTON [+VIDEO]
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 5:31:19 PM
Congratulations!!
The company cited Boston's "business ecosystem" as well as access to talent, long-term
costs, quality of life for employees and easy connections with other company assets and
the world as reasons for moving to the state.
"It's great news," House Speaker Robert DeLeo told reporters minutes before he went to
the floor of the House to announce the news to lawmakers, thanking them for their work in
passing two economic development bills in recent years that he credited with helping to
make Massachusetts an attractive landing spot for GE.
General Electric said it began considering a new location for its headquarters more than
three years ago and opened a formal review last June with a list of 40 potential locations.
The company publicly threatened to leave Connecticut in June after Gov. Dannel Malloy
signed a state budget that included corporate tax increases blasted by the business
community for creating an inhospitable environment.
Baker said he and Walsh assembled a task force that included Economic Development
Secretary Jay Ash, Administration and Finance Secretary Kristen Lepore and officials from
Massport, his office and City Hall to work with GE beginning at the end of the summer.
Associated Industries of Massachusetts President Richard Lord said Baker and Walsh
hosted a dinner on a Monday night in September at Tresca in the North End for GE's site
selection team. Lord, Ash and representatives from EMC and State Street Corporation also
attended the dinner.
Baker on Wednesday said GE would be a "tremendous part of the growing innovation
economy" in Massachusetts and send a signal to other companies that the state is a good
place to do business.
"We're talking about a Fortune 10 company, the 8th largest corporation in the United States
and a real leader in what I would describe as, sort of, the internet of things and the
movement toward creating smart machines," Baker said. "This is a huge win for the city of
Boston, a huge win for Massachusetts and the indirect-direct spillover from this will be felt
by this economy and this community for years to come."
The governor described the incentives as "pretty much the same sort of thing" made
available to other companies periodically looking to expand or grow in Massachusetts,
including tax breaks and grants for infrastructure and capital support. He said some of the
incentives will depend upon the site GE selects in the Seaport district.
The company plans to sell its offices in Fairfield, Conn. and at 30 Rockefeller Plaza in New
York City to help offset the cost of the move, which will begin over the summer.
Though an exact location has yet to be chosen, the company said it will have 800
employees in the Seaport District of Boston, including 200 corporate staff and 600 digital
industrial product managers, designers and developers. Employees will move to a
temporary location in Boston starting this summer, and the transition will be completed in
stages by 2018.
General Electric plans a public briefing with government, business and community leaders
on Feb. 18 to discuss the move.
In its announcement, General Electric noted spending in Massachusetts on research and
development, the state's "technologically-fluent workforce" and its status as home to 55
colleges and universities.
"'Boston lands new @generalelectric headquarters.' Proof that investments in #HigherEd
and innovation pay dividends," Sen. Eileen Donoghue, of Lowell, wrote on Twitter.
Massachusetts High Technology Council President Chris Anderson said General Electric
will be an "impact player" in the state's policy, civic, educational and philanthropic life.
"GE's selection of Boston reinforces the limitless opportunities for economic growth that are
available to us when business and political leaders work together to reinforce our
Commonwealth's strengths and to address our competitive challenges," Anderson said. "
The addition of its global headquarters in Boston will expand General Electric's already
growing footprint in Massachusetts, which includes nearly 5,000 employees in its aviation,
oil and gas and energy management businesses. The company moved its life sciences
headquarters to Marlborough in 2014, and last year announced that its energy services
start-up - Current - would be based in Boston.
"GE's move brings a host of benefits to the Massachusetts economy, from top-level jobs to
innovation to an unmatched global market presence. AIM and its 4,500 member employers
welcome GE headquarters to the commonwealth and congratulate the Baker and Walsh
administrations for recognizing that taxes, work force and other elements of the business
climate really matter in corporate location decisions," Lord said in a statement.
Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce President James Rooney said the development
would carry benefits beyond job creation and economic development in the neighborhood.
"Bringing an anchor institution like GE to Boston is fundamental for spurring our innovation
ecosystem, as established global companies provide the type of skills training and early
development for startup companies that help them thrive in the long run. Additionally, big
companies increase our ability to not only generate talented minds, but to keep them in
Boston where they belong," Rooney said.
-END01/13/2016
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
JD Chesloff
Ash, Jay (EOHED)
NY
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 6:33:39 PM
Mr. SecretaryI saw this from our sister organization in NYC. Thought you'd find it of interest. See you
tomorrow.
http://pfnyc.org/news_press/statement-from-kathryn-wylde-president-ceo-of-the-partnershipfor-new-york-city-on-ge-headquarters-decision/
JD
Sent from my iPhone
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
John J. Linehan
Ash, Jay (EOHED)
Ward, Aimee (EOHED)
Congratulations!
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 7:50:21 PM
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Congratulations on the announcement of GE headquarters moving to Boston. Fantastic news for Boston
and Massachusetts!
Chris
Christopher J. Willenborg
Executive Director
Massachusetts Military Asset and Security Strategy Task Force
Westover Metropolitan Airport
255 Padgette Street
Chicopee, MA 01022
413-593-0214 - Office
413-593-5126 - Fax
617-447-1823 - Mobile
christopher.willenborg@massmail.state.ma.us
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Callahan, Brendan
Kennealy, Michael (EOHED)
Congrats
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 8:36:55 PM
image001.png
Mike,
I wanted to take a moment to say congrats on GE.
What a huge win for the Commonwealth --- a globally reverberating validation of our world class city, it
unique talent pool and a strong welcoming government that has demonstrated it understands that when
businesses thrive all its people will thrive. Refreshing to say the least.
Hope to see you soon.
Brendan
Brendan W. Callahan
Managing Director
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Hi Mike,
I enjoyed chatting yesterday.
Quick down and dirty answer on new construction costs in Seaport is approximately $575 per square foot,
inclusive of land costs (highly variable), site work and union labor for a high rise building WITHOUT
structured parking. Above ground structured parking is usually carried at $25K per stall and higher for
below grade parking especially close to the water.
Let me know if you need more info and send a few dates for coffee or a cocktail to follow up on our other
discussions.
Brendan
Brendan W. Callahan
Managing Director
Hi Brendan, hope you are well and had a great Thanksgiving. I had a quick question for a project we
are working on that I thought you could help with could you call me? Cell phone number below,
thanks.
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete it. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not keep, use, disclose, copy or distribute this email without the author's
prior permission. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software
viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this
message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses. The
information contained in this communication may be confidential and may be subject to the
attorney-client privilege. If you are the intended recipient and you do not wish to receive
similar electronic messages from us in the future then please respond to the sender to this
effect.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Team win!
Chris
Christopher J. Willenborg
Executive Director
Massachusetts Military Asset and Security Strategy Task Force
Westover Metropolitan Airport
255 Padgette Street
Chicopee, MA 01022
413-593-0214 - Office
413-593-5126 - Fax
617-447-1823 - Mobile
christopher.willenborg@massmail.state.ma.us
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Folks,
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Thanks, John!
We will be in touch shortly.
Happy new year!
Aimee
Sent from Aimee's iPhone
617-356-3037
On Jan 13, 2016, at 7:50 PM, John J. Linehan <jlinehan@ZOONEWENGLAND.COM>
wrote:
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
John J. Linehan
Ward, Aimee (EOHED)
Ash, Jay (EOHED)
RE: Congratulations!
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 10:44:17 PM
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
JD Chesloff
Executive Director
Massachusetts Business Roundtable
141 Tremont Street, 5th Floor
Boston, MA 02111
617-728-0881
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Jay,
Congratulations on this - I know you out in a ton of work.
Ron
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Steffen, Mark (GOV)" <mark.steffen@MassMail.State.MA.US>
Date: January 13, 2016 at 2:00:29 PM EST
To: "Steffen, Mark (GOV)" <mark.steffen@MassMail.State.MA.US>
Subject: General Electric Chooses Boston for World Headquarters
BOSTON Governor Charlie Baker and Mayor Martin J. Walsh today celebrated
General Electric's decision to relocate their world headquarters to Boston to take
advantage of Boston and the Commonwealth's innovative and competitive economy
and access to human capital and world-class educational institutions. General Electric
will bring approximately 800 high-paying jobs to Boston with this move.
"General Electric's choice to move to Boston is the result of the city's willingness and
excitement to work creatively and collaboratively to bring positive activity to our local
economy and continue to grow our industries," said Mayor Walsh. "Boston is
delighted and honored to welcome General Electric and its employees to our
community and we are confident that this is the start of a strong partnership."
Bringing General Electric's operations to the Seaport District will cement the company
as an anchor in the city's innovation industry.The Commonwealth offered incentives
up to $120 million through grants and other programs and up to $25 million was
offered from the city of Boston in property tax relief. Additional incentives offered to
General Electric include:
<!--[if !supportLists]--> <!--[endif]-->$1 million in grants for workforce training;
<!--[if !supportLists]--> <!--[endif]-->Up to $5 million for an innovation center to
forge connections between GE, innovators from Massachusetts research
institutions and the higher education community;
<!--[if !supportLists]--> <!--[endif]-->Commitment to existing local transportation
improvements in the Seaport District;
<!--[if !supportLists]--> <!--[endif]-->Appointment of a joint relocation team to
ease the transition for employees moving to Boston;
<!--[if !supportLists]--> <!--[endif]-->Assistance for eligible employees looking to
buy homes in Boston;
Additional details will be released as available.
###
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Derek Santos
jay.ash
Cograts on the big GE win
Thursday, January 14, 2016 6:32:54 AM
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail or its attachments.
This email and any files transmitted with it areconfidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual(s) or entity named above.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Chris Geehern
Sullivan, Martha; Ash, Jay (EOHED); Hartman, Scott V.; Brown, Jeff W
AIM Panel Documents
Thursday, January 14, 2016 6:59:48 AM
2016OutlookForumScript.Final.CPG.doc
SOMB.01.13.15.docx
Attached are two documents pertaining to the Associated Industries of Massachusetts Economic
Outlook Forum panel tomorrow morning:
Please note one item in the script that has changed since our conversation on Tuesday. I am now
suggesting that Jeffs first question during the panel discussion be one directed at Jay about the
significance of the GE location announcement yesterday.
I look forward to seeing you tomorrow. My cell is 617.834.4414 if you have any questions.
Best,
Chris
Script
January 15, 2016 AIM Economic Outlook Forum
7:30 9:15 A.M. Waltham Westin Hotel
Program: 8 a.m.
Dan Kenary:
Good Morning:
My name is Dan Kenary, Chief Executive
Officer of The Harpoon Brewery in Boston and
Chair of the Associated Industries of
Massachusetts Board of Directors. Thank you
for joining us this morning as we break out
our crystal ball for AIMs Seventh Annual
Economic Outlook Forum.
Before I introduce Rick Lord and our
panelists, I am pleased to recognize the
Founding Sponsor of this mornings program
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts.
PANEL DISCUSSION
Jeff Brown:
Thank you Rick. Your remarks will certainly
provide our panel with a number of issues to
comment on. Would members of the panel
please come forward and be seated?
Our panel reflects much of the diversity and
promise that Rick identified as the hallmarks
of the Massachusetts economy:
Martha Sullivan Chief Executive Officer of
Sensata Technologies in Attleboro. Sensata is
the worlds leading supplier of sensors and
controls used in automotive, appliance,
aircraft, industrial, military, heavy vehicle,
heating, air conditioning, data,
telecommunications, recreational vehicle and
(Video)
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Peter Abair
jay.ash@state.ma.us
congrats
Thursday, January 14, 2016 7:03:10 AM
Jay - Congrats on GE. This is a great victory for MA and credit to the
Administration.
My parents worked a combined 69 years at GE in Pittsfield, at a now
long-closed facility. That GE chose Massachusetts for its headquarters
(and its Marlboro life sciences facility) is an indication how far the
Massachusetts economy has come since the days of closures of GE operations
in places like Pittsfield and Fitchburg.
Now we just have to spread some of this activity farther afield from
greater Boston. (You can get that done next year).
All the best,
Pete
Sent from my iPhone
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
FYI
Sent from Aimee's iPhone
617-356-3037
Begin forwarded message:
From: Brad MacDougall <BMacdougall@aimnet.org>
Date: January 14, 2016 at 8:56:00 AM EST
To: "Ward, Aimee (EOHED)" <aimee.ward@MassMail.State.MA.US>,
"Wilkerson, Timothy (EOHED)" <timothy.wilkerson@MassMail.State.MA.US>
Subject: AIM - GE
Aimee and Tim wanted to make sure you saw this. Brad
September.
GEs move brings a host of benefits to the Massachusetts economy, from toplevel jobs to innovation to an unmatched global market presence. AIM and its
4,500 member employers welcome GE headquarters to the commonwealth and
congratulate the Baker and Walsh administrations for recognizing that taxes,
work force and other elements of the business climate really matter in corporate
location decisions.
The company said Boston is a logical location for a company seeking to marry
manufacturing with advanced technology.
GE aspires to be the most competitive company in the world, GE Chairman and
CEO Jeff Immelt said in a statement.
Today, GE is a $130 billion high-tech global industrial company, one that is
leading the digital transformation of industry. We want to be at the center of an
ecosystem that shares our aspirations. Greater Boston is home to 55 colleges and
universities.
Massachusetts spends more on research and development than any other region
in the world, and Boston attracts a diverse, technologically-fluent workforce
focused on solving challenges for the world. We are excited to bring our
headquarters to this dynamic and creative city.
GE will bring roughly 800 jobs to Boston - 200 from corporate staff and 600
digital industrial product managers, designers and developers split between GE
Digital, Current, robotics and Life Sciences. A GE Digital Foundry will be
created for co-development, incubation and product development with customers,
startups and partners.
GE already has a significant presence in Massachusetts, with nearly 5,000
employees across the state in businesses including Aviation, Oil & Gas and
Energy Management. In 2014, GE moved its Life Sciences headquarters to
Marlborough, and in 2015 GE announced its energy services start-up, Current,
would also be headquartered in Boston.
AIM worked with Governor Charlie Baker and Boston Mayor Marty Walsh to
bring a handful of business leaders together to meet with GEs site selection team
for a dinner at Tresca in the North End on September 14. Representatives from
two AIM member companies EMC and State Street Corporation joined Lord,
Baker, Walsh and Secretary of Housing and Economic Development Jay Ash.
One of the strengths I talked about was the fact that the governor, Legislature
and the mayor have worked together in a bipartisan manner to create a
predictable business climate, Lord said.
He noted that GE was the second company to join AIM in 1915 and that GE
Executive Richard Rice, served as the first chairman of the association from
1915-1917.
Bradley A. MacDougall
Associated Industries of Massachusetts
Vice President | Government Affairs
617.262.1180 |@bradmacdougall | www.aimnet.org | Skype Video
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Marc Dohan
Jay Ash
Congratulations on General Electric
Thursday, January 14, 2016 9:17:48 AM
Dear Jay:
I just wanted to congratulate you on getting GE to relocate to Massachusetts.
Great job!
Marc Dohan
--
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Greg Torres
Ash, Jay (EOHED)
Nice going
Thursday, January 14, 2016 9:23:48 AM
Congrats on the GE deal!! Let's grab lunch sometime before we get too far
into 2016. Greg
Sent from my iPhone
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Moore, Pat
Frazier, Ricks (EOHED)
Congratulations -- GE!
Thursday, January 14, 2016 9:32:54 AM
Ricks,
I hope this email finds you well. I was excited to read the news in the paper this morning, which I
hope involved some interesting legal issues. Congrats to you and the team.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Hi Jay
I was wondering if GE asked about moving their flight department from
Stewart Airport in upstate NY to MA? The civilian airport management team
at Westover is very interested in working with GE if they are interested.
I aware about the helipad needs in Boston from MassDOT.
Thanks
Chris
Sent from my iPhone
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Very well said. Only question is -- which sport? A team sport I am sure
and happy every single day to be a part of it.
Congrats to all!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 2:20 PM, Kadish, Steven (GOV)
<steven.kadish@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
>
>
> Secretaries and colleagues,
>
> A very different way to start this year compared to last.
> As you will remember, last year the first day of the Baker/Polito
Administration coincided with the announcement of the Boston 2024 Olympic
Bid.
> This week we celebrate the decision of GE to move their headquarters to
Boston. Some of the pundits have said that this is the real gold medal.
>
> Agenda for tomorrow's Cabinet meeting below.
>
> Best,
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> Agenda:
>
> 1. Opening (Governor)
>
> 2. Thank you to GE team
> 15 minutes
>
> 3. Updates
> --Key dates and deadlines (Elizabeth)
> --Performance Management to March 1 deadline (Elizabeth, Adam)
> --State of the Commonwealth Logistics (Dean)
> --Weekly Tracker (Steve)
> 25 minutes
>
> 3. Budget (Sec Lepore)
> --FY17
> 20 minutes
>
> 5. Round the Table (All)
> 60 minutes
>
> 6. Close (Governor)
>
>
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Gintautas Dumcius
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Hi John,
Hopefully youve seen a few mentions in the press about the important role our dinner in September
played in the GE process. Jay and I really cant thank you enough, again, for your help in pulling
together such a great group for the dinner. Were all thrilled with this outcome after many months
of work it was a great team effort. Now that things might settle down a little, it would be great to
find a time to meet in person.
Thanks again, and all the best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
John,
Thank you very much again for all your help, especially on such short notice, with our event this
week. Rick, Pat, Bill and Chris were all great, and it was terrific having them there to speak so
genuinely about the Commonwealth in addition to the Governor, Mayor Walsh and President
Meehan it was quite a lineup! We already have received very good feedback from the company
and I know the dinner program was an important factor. Let me know if we can be helpful with
anything, and hope well have the opportunity to meet in person at some point.
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Julian, James
Kennealy, Michael (SEA)
RE: Thank you
Thursday, January 14, 2016 4:20:51 PM
Congratulations on a wonderful result. I know it was a lot of hard work that got GE to yes. I would
make myself available for coffee at your convenience. Ann Marie in my office can set that up
anytime.
JIM
Hi Jim,
Hopefully youve seen a few mentions in the press about the important role our dinner in September
played in the process. Jay and I really cant thank you and President Meehan enough, again, for
your role in this. Were all thrilled with this outcome after many months of work it was a great
team effort. Now that things might settle down a little, it would be great to grab coffee sometime
soon I can send some dates or if youd like to suggest some that works great too.
Thanks again, and all the best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
I am glad it worked out. We want to be helpful. Lets grab coffee some day soon
JIM
On Sep 18, 2015, at 2:57 PM, Kennealy, Michael (SEA) <michael.kennealy@state.ma.us> wrote:
Jim,
Thank you again for all your help with our event this week. President Meehan was
great, and it was terrific having him there to speak so genuinely about the
Commonwealth alongside the Governor and Mayor Walsh. We already have received
very good feedback from the company and I know the dinner program was an
important factor. Let me know if we can be helpful with anything, and hope well have
the opportunity to meet in person at some point.
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Mike,
Congratulations on your role in the GE project. Great news for the Commonwealth.
Best,
Michael Quinlin
Director, Commonwealth Marketing Office
Massachusetts Marketing Partnership
Massachusetts Office of Travel & Tourism
10 Park Plaza, Suite 4510
Boston, MA 02116
617 973-8503
www.massvacation.com
www.massitsallhere.com
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
I haven't yet.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 3:06 PM, Goldberger, Ben (GOV) <ben.goldberger@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
>
> Has everyone had a full opportunity to review this? If there are any new concepts we are incorporating into the
ED bill, we should include them in the next EDIP draft that Jonathan will be circulating to staff tomorrow or
Tuesday.
>
> -----Original Message----> From: Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF)
> Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 8:03 PM
> To: Lepore, Kristen (ANF)
> Cc: Kadish, Steven (GOV); Goldberger, Ben (GOV); Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Ash, Jay (EOHED); Ross,
Robert (ANF)
> Subject: Re: Comments on ideas?
>
> I have a copy for you.
>
>
>
>> On Jan 7, 2016, at 7:39 PM, Lepore, Kristen (ANF) <kristen.lepore@MassMail.State.MA.US> wrote:
>>
>> Is this a new proposal being floated? If so, please provide all of the details beyond the paragraph below.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Kristen
>>
>> -----Original Message---->> From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
>> Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 7:16 PM
>> To: Goldberger, Ben (GOV); Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Ash, Jay
>> (EOHED); Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF); Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Ross,
>> Robert (ANF)
>> Subject: RE: Comments on ideas?
>>
>> We need Sec Lepore and Jen to weigh in.
>>
>> -----Original Message---->> From: Goldberger, Ben (GOV)
>> Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 6:43 PM
>> To: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Kadish, Steven (GOV); Ash, Jay (EOHED);
>> Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF)
>> Subject: RE: Comments on ideas?
>>
>> If we want to pursue this as a policy matter, we can modify the language so that it gels with the other changes we
are making to the statute.
>>
>> -----Original Message---->> From: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED)
>> Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 6:20 PM
>> To: Kadish, Steven (GOV); Ash, Jay (EOHED); Sullivan, Jennifer F.
>> (ANF); Goldberger, Ben (GOV)
>> Subject: RE: Comments on ideas?
>>
>> In concept I like this approach. If I understand this correctly, it is self-funding, directly tied to jobs, and paid in
arrears; so no guesswork on number of jobs or need for clawback provisions as the company is paid every year on
what it actually produced. Big variables obviously are (1) size of credit (5% means no income tax receipts net of
credit) and (2) length of incentive period - how long until the Commonwealth starts receiving a 5% tax rate from
the project. I wonder if the budget implications are easier here - if we did a deal using this framework where it was
a 3% rebate for 10 years, and we were convinced that we were not going to receive the revenue otherwise, is the 3%
really an expense or do we account for this as a project where the tax rate is 2% for 10 years and 5% thereafter? In
any case, I think this is worth considering; this approach has been suggested by others as I've discussed with Jay
and Ricks.
>>
>> Mike Kennealy
>> Assistant Secretary for Business Growth The Commonwealth of
>> Massachusetts Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development One
>> Ashburton Place, Room 2101 Boston, MA 02108
>> Office: 617-788-3640
>> Cell: 617-634-4762
>> michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
>>
>> -----Original Message---->> From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:05 PM
>> To: Ash, Jay (EOHED) <jay.ash@MassMail.State.MA.US>; Kennealy, Michael
>> (EOHED) <Michael.kennealy@MassMail.State.MA.US>; Sullivan, Jennifer F.
>> (ANF) <Jennifer.F.Sullivan@MassMail.State.MA.US>; Goldberger, Ben
>> (GOV) <ben.goldberger@MassMail.State.MA.US>
>> Subject: Comments on ideas?
>>
>> Please let me know what you think of the EDIP related ideas?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Kristen J. Sabella
Deputy Director of Policy & Communications
P: 617-788-3604
C: 617-352-8437
I stepped away from my desk for one moment and missed his call! Im trying to reach him on the number
he gave me and the number he called from, but Im not getting him. Can he call me again? Im still at my
desk. Thanks! Sorry!
Jay is booked until 6, but I have asked him to call you as soon as his mtgs are done!
Kristen J. Sabella
Deputy Director of Policy & Communications
P: 617-788-3604
C: 617-352-8437
If its not too late, 617-300-2428 is best. I should be at my desk for a while. After that, my cell is 212-9209652. Thanks!
Ok, will do my best. What is the best number for him to reach you on?
Kristen J. Sabella
Deputy Director of Policy & Communications
p: 617-788-3604
c: 617-352-8437
Craig, WGBH
617-300-2428
cell: 212-920-9652
Hi Craig,
What is your timing here? Jay is jammed this afternoon, but could maybe do something after 6 today?
Kristen J. Sabella
Deputy Director of Policy & Communications
p: 617-788-3604
c: 617-352-8437
Thanks, Lizzy. Is there someone from the state (Jay Ash?) who I can talk to today about how the state
attracted GE?
On Background:
The Commonwealth has offered GE up to $120M in Direct Economic Development Incentives in the
form of capital spending on public infrastructure projects. While the specific projects will vary
depending on the site GE eventually chooses, MA routinely invests in public infrastructure that
unlocks private development. The public infrastructure improvements could include for example,
new roads and highway ramps, water and sewer infrastructure, public parking facilities, utility work,
site demolition and remediation, etc.
This past fall, the administration committed $85.6M in MassWorks capital grants to public
infrastructure projects that unlock private investment and job creation
http://www.mass.gov/hed/press-releases/administration-awards-85-6-million-in-massworksawards.html
If you have questions on property tax you should contact the city.
Thanks,
Lizzy
Elizabeth Guyton
Press Secretary
Office of Governor Charlie Baker
617-483-3394
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
All
Jay asked me to advise you that Governor Baker has invited the participants in the discussions with
GE to attend the Cabinet meeting tomorrow at 10:00. The Governor would like to express his
appreciation for the effort and creativity that forged the path to success. You are all welcome to
attend if you are available.
Ricks Frazier
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Alberto Calvo
Jay Ash
What a coup!!
Thursday, January 14, 2016 7:42:59 PM
Jay:
Congratulations for the GE coup!!
This will be a transformative change to Boston and Massachusetts. Heading
to become the next "Silicon Valley" of the east coast.
Regards,
Alberto Calvo
Stop and Compare Supermarkets
PS Did you receive my letter?
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
http://www.wcvb.com/news/is-boston-ready-for-impact-of-ge-move/37442682
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Thanks Elizabeth! Great working with you and the Massport team on this. Please see attached
this was sent with our proposal on December 1. Please let me know if you need anything else.
Best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Hi Michael, Congratulations and thank you for all of your hard work! Could you send along a copy of
the updated brochure that was sent to the Globe? Many thanks, Elizabeth
Elizabeth Morse
Chief of Staff
Massachusetts Port Authority
One Harborside Drive, Suite 200S
East Boston, MA 02128
617-568-1007
emorse@massport.com
PROJECT PLUM
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS
...an ecosystem thats forward-looking
December 1, 2015
a talented city
a youthful city
| introduction
Martin J. Walsh
Mayor
City of Boston
| introduction
work
innovate
project plum
| introduction
St
a
se
el
Ex
pw
y
Bo
st
on
Meridian St
Piers
Park
Faneuil Hall
Quincy Market
Former BPS HQ
(26 Court Street)
St
n
to
ng
W
as
hi
St
ss
re
Fan Pier
Se
a
SOUTH
STATION
Knee
la
nd S
t
Boston Inner
Harbor
ng
Co
St
se
ha
Av
c
r
tic
Pu
lan
t
A
Boylston St
CHINATOWN
NE Aquarium
FINANCIAL
DISTRICT
DOWNTOWN
CROSSING
Tufts
Medical
Center
Long Wharf
po
rt
FORT POINT
DISTRICT
MassDOT
Building
Seaport
World
Trade
Center
Blv
d
Su
m
me
Parcel A-2
rS
Parcel H
D
World Trade
Center Ave
St
Alb
any
ley
St
Broadw
ay
W4
or
M a ss
Cruiseship
Terminal
SOUTH BOSTON
WATERFRONT
th S
Rd
erke
Dorchester Av
EB
Parcels
D2/D3
Boston
Convention
& Exhibition
Center
tHa
ul
Hera
ld St
Rd
Boston
City Hall
Christopher
Columbus
Park
St
bri
d
Boston
Common
Trem
ont
St
r
ve
no
Ha
LOGAN
INTERNATIONAL
AIRPORT
GOV'T
CENTER
S
con
Bea
Ch
in
To
b
M
au
ric
e
Staniford St
ac S
t
BEACON
HIL
sS
os
Mer
rim
ial
S
n
un n
r T n Tu
e
n a
m h
Su alla
C
Cr
| transportation
project plum
Com
me
rc
EAST BOSTON
l
ne
NORTH
END
St
el
TD Garden
NORTH
STATION
Cam
helipad
rS
nS
ge
The South Boston Waterfront and Innovation District, in particular, has robust water transportation infrastructure in place
with further potential to expand service.
Currently there are water transportation
docks in place at Fan Pier, Fan Pier Cove,
Pier 4, Liberty Wharf, and a new ferry
terminal is designed for the World Trade
Center at Commonwealth Pier.
ne
gto
hanger
in
ash
NW
E
Surrounding Bostons 400 year old downtown peninsula is one of the most extraordinary
concentrations of innovation, business, recreation, and transportation in all of North America.
Bostons downtown boasts an incredible proximity to Logan Airportnonstop flights to 53
international and 76 domestic destinations are never
Su more than 16 minutes away.
m
E Street
Ha
ul
St
St
signage
ton
ng
nni
Be
YOUR HEADQUARTERS
W
ar
re
n
i n St
Br
id
ge
TRANSPORTATION &
INFRASTRUCTURE INCENTIVES
CHARLESTOWN
Br
oa
D Street
dw
ay
1s
project plum
| location map
Br
id
ge
existing building
W
ar
re
n
i n St
This location is within walking distance to four MBTA lines, including the South Station Intermodal
Center with connections to Logan Airport via the Silver Line. It is also minutes from the Mass
Turnpike (route 90) and the primary north-south artery through Boston, the Southeast Expressway
(route 93), as well as the Ted Williams tunnel to Logan Airport. The site is 3 parcels totaling 5.8
acres, with an existing 104,000 square foot office building for renovation.
a
The 11 story building is roughly 160,000 square feet and centrally located with proximity to the
financial district and Massachusetts State House. One of the most historic buildings in Downtown
Boston, 26 Court Street is believed to be the oldest plot of land continuously owned by the City of
Boston. The building has served Boston as a jail, court house, and most recently was home to the
headquarters of Boston Public Schools.
| downtown
To
b
| downtown
in
for renovation
CHARLESTOWN
St
ing
ash
NW
St
a
se
el
Ex
pw
y
Boston
Common
Trem
ont
St
Staniford St
Possible
new headquarters in a highly
St
con
visible location.
bri
d
St
Boston
City Hall
Faneuil Hall
Quincy Market
Christopher
Columbus
Park
Former BPS HQ
(26 Court Street)
in
gt
on
St
St
FINANCIAL
Boylston St
Long Wharf
NE Aquarium
DOWNTOWN
CROSSING
Tufts
Medical
Center
t
eS
as
h
Av
c
r
tic
Pu
lt an
A
SOUTH
STATION
CHINATOWN
Boston Inner
Harbor
FINANCIAL
DISTRICT
St
ss
re
ve
no
Ha
GOV'T
CENTER
ge
Boston
Common
rS
NE Aquarium
ng
Co
sS
os
Long Wharf
Bea
Cr
ac S
t
Cam
con
Bea
Piers
Park
Faneuil Hall
Quincy Market
Christopher
Columbus
Park
Former BPS HQ
(26 Court Street)
St
Possible
TD Garden office space available for high tech
NORTH
NORTH
and
IT infrastructure jobs
ENDand new location
STATION
for innovation lab.
LOGAN
INTERNATIONAL
AIRPORT
BEACON
HIL
Boston
City Hall
ng
to
n
bri
d
MassDOT
el l
nn ne
Tu Tun
r
ne an
m h
Su alla
C
Ha
CENTER
ownership
Cam
W
as
hi
ial
S
EAST BOSTON
St
nS
Com
me
rc
rS
23 minutes
ve
GOV'T by transit
no
ge
gto
City of Boston
rS
ac S
05 minutes
by t car
t
Staniford St
in
ash
NW
ne
ownership
Mer
rim
Meridian St
Su
m
NORTH
END
sS
os
08 minutes by car
20 minutes by transit
3.0 miles
Cr
2.4 miles
TDEligible
Garden
NORTH
STATION to logan
proximity
ial
S
el l
nn ne
Tu Tun
r
ne an
m h
Su alla
C
Br
id
ge
in
To
b
St
proximity to logan
BEACON
HIL
helipad
Bo
st
on
M
au
ric
e
To be determined
Mer
rim
St
W
ar
re
n
i n St
nS
gto
n
nni
Be
Com
me
rc
ton
CHARLESTOWN
helipad
Ch
26 court street
MASSDOT BUILDING
existing building
for renovation
M
au
ric
e
Knee
la
nd S
t
MassDOT
Building
Fan Pier
Se
a
po
FORT POINT
DISTRICT
rt
Blv
d
Su
m
me
rS
World Trad
Meridian St
MassPort
FORT POINT
DISTRICT
Su
m
me
y St
Parcels
D2/D3
M a ss
St
a
el
se
Ch
in
St
W
as
hi
ng
to
n
Ex
pw
y
Bo
st
on
permitting phase
t
eS
Av
c
r
tic
Pu
n
a
l
At
MassDOT
Building
Fan Pier
ownership
Se
a
po
FORT POINT
DISTRICT
rt
Blv
d
EDIC
Su
m
me
Seaport
World
Trade
Center
Parcel A-2
rS
World Trade
Center Ave
St
or
Boston
Convention
tHa
ul
Hera
ld St
nd S
t
Parcel H
D
World Trade
Center Ave
Knee
la
Tufts
Medical
Center
Parcel A-2
rS
FINANCIAL
DISTRICT
SOUTH
STATION
CHINATOWN
Boston Inner
proximity
to ferry access
Harbor
Parcel H
Rd
nd S
t
tB
lvd
22 minutes by transit
NE Aquarium
s
ha
Boylston St
Seaport
World
Trade
Center
10 minutes by car
Long Wharf
Boston
Convention
Parcels
D2/D3
tHa
ul
Knee
la
Tufts
Medical
Center
MassDOT
Building
DOWNTOWN
CROSSING
3.1 miles
or
ea
po
ownership
r
Former BPS HQ
(26 Court Street)
St
Boston
Common
Faneuil Hall
Quincy Market
St
SOUTH
STATION
Boston
City Hall
proximity to logan
Christopher
Columbus
Park
Fan Pier
con
y St
t
eS
Av
c
r
tic
Pu
n
a
l
At
Bea
Ha
St
ss
re
CHINATOWN
Boston Inner
proximity to ferry
access
Harbor
Eligible
rS
ve
no
ng
Co
Boylston St
15 minutes by transit
permitting phase
s
ha
bri
d
BEACON
HIL
FINANCIAL
DISTRICT
St
ss
re
DOWNTOWN
CROSSING
NE Aquarium
ng
Co
W
as
hi
ng
to
n
Boston
Common
11 minutes by car
Long Wharf
Trem
ont
St
St
St
GOV'T
CENTER
Cam
Rd
Former BPS HQ
(26 Court Street)
2.8 miles
helipad
St
con
St
Bea
Faneuil Hall
Quincy Market
ac S
t
ge
ge
BEACON
HIL
Boston
City Hall
proximity to logan
Christopher
Columbus
Park
St
bri
d
Ha
Piers
Park
LOGAN
INTERNATIONA
AIRPORT
Staniford St
Staniford St
GOV'T
CENTER
Cam
Trem
ont
St
Eligible
rS
ve
no
NORTH
END
sS
os
Mer
rim
Cr
sS
os
St
helipad
Cr
ac S
t
ton
ing
St
Piers
Park
ash
NW
ton
ing
ash
NW
Mer
rim
NORTH
END
LOGAN
INTERNATIONAL
TD Garden
NORTH
AIRPORT
STATION
TD Garden
NORTH
STATION
To
b
6 tide street
The Project Site is strategically located within the South Boston Waterfront
District, occupying two
Su
mn
er Summer Street is the major
of the four corners at the intersection of Summer Street and D Street.
St
EAST BOSTON
east-west street in the District, providing a direct connection
to
downtown
Boston. D Street is the
l l
e
n e
major north-south street, linkingCothe
waterfront to the traditional
South Boston neighborhood. The
un nn
r T n Tu
mm
e
n ha
erc
m a
ial 4.9 acres on two
Project Site consists of approximately
parcels owned by Massport.
Su allseparate
St
vacant land
for development
Meridian St
Bo
st
on
St
St
6 TIDE STREET
nS
gto
n
nni
Be
M
au
ric
e
Ex
pw
y
W
ar
re
n
i n St
vacant land
for development
Br
id
ge
St
a
Ch
To
b
M
au
ric
e
CHARLESTOWN
M
W
ar
re
n
i n St
el
se
Br
id
ge
nS
gto
n
nni
Be
in
CHARLESTOWN
M a ss
NE Aquarium
proximity to ferryBoston
access Inner
Fan Pier
po
FORT POINT
DISTRICT
rt
Su
m
me
Seaport
World
Trade
Center
Blv
d
Boston
Ma
ss p
St
a
Ch
Ex
pw
y
Bo
st
on
Meridian St
Boston Inner
proximity to ferry
access
Harbor
t
eS
MassDOT
Building
16 minutes by transit
Fan Pier
Massport
Se
a
po
FORT POINT
DISTRICT
rt
Su
m
me
Seaport
World
Trade
Center
Blv
d
Parcel A-2
rS
World Trade
Center Ave
Parcel H
Hera
ld St
tHa
ul
Parcels
or
ld St
nd S
t
Parcel H
Hera
NE Aquarium
FINANCIAL
DISTRICT
SOUTH
STATION
Knee
la
Tufts
Medical
Center
World Trade
Center Ave
08 minutes by car
Long Wharf
as
v
rch tic A
Pu
n
a
l
At
CHINATOWN
Parcel A-2
rS
el
se
Br
id
ge
in
St
W
as
hi
ng
to
n
DOWNTOWN
CROSSING
2.6 miles
Boston
Convention
Parcels
D2/D3
tHa
ul
nd S
t
MassDOT
Building
Former BPS HQ
(26 Court Street)
Boylston St
Se
a
Faneuil Hall
Quincy Market
or
Knee
la
Trem
ont
St
Massport
proximity to logan
Christopher
Columbus
Park
CHINATOWN
Boston
Common
ownership
Rd
SOUTH
STATION
Boston
City Hall
St
con
Bea
Harbor
Existing water taxi dock
at Liberty Wharf
(0.3 mi.), Pier 4 water taxi (0.3 mi.), Fan Pier
Cove ferry terminal (0.35 mi.)
Ha
St
ss
re
St
ss
re
t
eS
15 minutes by transit
as
v
rch tic A
Pu
lan
t
A
Boylston St
Tufts
Medical
Center
ng
Co
DOWNTOWN
CROSSING
FINANCIAL
DISTRICT
bri
d
BEACON
HIL
St
ng
to
n
St
St
Cam
08 minutes by car
Long Wharf
Eligible
rS
ve
no
ng
Co
Boston
Common
Former BPS HQ
(26 Court Street)
W
as
hi
con
St
Bea
Faneuil Hall
Quincy Market
GOV'T
CENTER
y St
ge
BEACON
HIL
Boston
City Hall
2.6 miles
helipad
St
bri
d
Christopher
Columbus
Park
LOGA
INTER
AIRPO
Piers
Park
Rd
proximity to logan
ac S
t
ge
Cam
Trem
ont
St
r
ve
no
a
H
Staniford St
sS
os
Staniford St
Cr
Eligible
GOV'T
CENTER
Mer
rim
NORTH
END
sS
os
helipad
Cr
Piers
Park
LOGAN
TD Garden
INTERNATIONAL NORTH
STATION
AIRPORT
ial
S
e l
nn ne
Tu Tun
r
ne an
m h
Su alla
C
St
NORTH
END
ac S
t
M
au
ric
e
Ex
pw
y
Bo
st
on
Com
me
rc
St
St
TD Garden
NORTH
STATION
ial
S
n e
un nn
r T n Tu
e
n a
m h
Su alla
C
Similar to A2, this 1.8 acre sites location in the South Boston Waterfront
District delivers great
Su
er
access and amenities. It is also adjacent to the MBTA Silver line withmnthe
potential for
on-site
St
EAST BOSTON
structured parking.
l
ton
ton
Com
me
rc
ing
ing
ash
NW
Located in the heart of the innovation district, this is a 1.2 acre site with terrific transit access.
Adjacent to the MBTA Silver line and a short walk to South Station directly
accesses the airport and
Su
mn
e
rS
greater Boston in a matter of minutes. For commuters, there is available parking
in the planned
Air
t
EAST BOSTON
Rights Garage adjacent to A2 with a possible direct pedestrian connection.
el l
vacant land
for development
ash
NW
Meridian St
congress street
nS
gto
n
nni
Be
To
b
St
a
el
se
Ch
Br
id
ge
To
b
M
au
ric
e
PARCEL H
St
St
Mer
rim
W
ar
re
n
i n St
vacant
for development
CHARLESTOWN
M
A2
W
ar
re
n
i n St
land
ton
ing
nn
Be
in
CHARLESTOWN
St
M a ss
6 Tide Stre
Br
id
ge
To
b
St
M
au
ric
e
W
ar
re
n
i n St
ton
ng
nni
Be
in
CHARLESTOWN
Meridian St
St
St
a
el
se
St
Bo
st
on
Ex
pw
y
M
au
ric
e
Meridian St
St
AIRPORT
S
con
Bea
n
to
ng
Trem
ont
St
2.6 miles
Longminutes
Wharf
08
by car
MassDOT
Building
proximity to ferry
or
tB
lvd
access
FORT POINT
Seaport
World
Trade
Center
Liberty
Wharf
World Trade
Parcel H
Center
Ave Center Authority
Massachusetts
Convention
ownership
Rd
St
Massport
FORT POINT
DISTRICT
rt
Blv
d
Su
m
me
Seaport
World
Trade
Center
EB
erke
Parcel A-2
rS
Parcel H
tHa
ul
or
Parcels
D2/D3
M a ss
M a ss
Cruiseship
Terminal
SOUTH BOSTON
WATERFRONT
th S
Boston
Convention
& Exhibition
St
Broadw
ay
W4
Hera
ld St
ley
Parcels
D2/D3
Boston
Convention
& Exhibition
Center
St
po
or
ld St
Se
a
tHa
ul
Hera
World Trade
Center Ave
y St
ap
Rd
nd S
t
E Street
Ha
ul
Knee
la
nd S
t
Fan Pier
10 minutes by car
Alb
any
CHINATOWN
Knee
la
Tufts
Medical
Center
Fan Pier
Rd
St
W
as
hi
ng
to
n
SOUTH
STATION
3.0 miles
ownership
St
St
ss
re
St
se
ha
Av
c
r
tic
Pu
lt an
A
SOUTH
STATION
CHINATOWN
ng
Co
Boylston St
Harbor
proximity to logan
t
eS
Av
c
r
tic
Pu
lt an
A
Boylston St
Eligible
s
ha
Dorchester Av
St
Faneuil Hall
Quincy Market
DOWNTOWN
CROSSING
St
ss
re
proximity to logan
Christopher
Columbus
Park
Former BPS HQ 15
NEminutes
Aquarium by transit
Boston Inner
(26 Court Street)
DOWNTOWN
CROSSING
Tufts
Medical
Center
r
ve
no
Boston Inner
Harbor
helipad
FINANCIAL
DISTRICT
ng
Co
Ha
Boston
City Hall
St
Boston
Common
Piers
Park
Boston
Common
Eligible
S
HIL
St
Piers
Park
W
as
hi
sS
os
Staniford St
Cr
bri
d
ge
con
Bea
vacant land
for development
helipad
GOV'T
CENTER
BEACON
HIL
NORTH
END
St
NORTH
END
ac S
t
Cam
Trem
ont
St
ge
TD Garden
NORTH
STATION
Mer
rim
ial
S
e
nn ne
Tu Tun
r
ne an
m h
Su alla
C
el l
nn ne
Tu Tun
r
ne an
m h
Su alla
C
sS
os
ton
Com
me
rc
TD Garden
NORTH
STATION
EAST BOSTO
Cr
ing
ash
NW
Located in the South Boston Waterfront District, this site has the capacity for a 150,000
square foot
Su
m
er
office building with parking provided in the adjacent Massport Air Rights Garage. nThe
site
is alsoEAST BOSTON
St
adjacent to the MBTA Silver line station.
l l
ial
S
vacant land
for development
St
Com
me
rc
rS
To
b
in
n
Be
ton
W
ar
re
n
i n St
Ch
nin
ne
ing
CHARLESTOWN
t
nS
gto
ash
NW
Br
id
ge
Su
m
Br
oa
D Street
dw
ay
1s
DEPARTMENT
NAME
Governors Office
Mayors Office
| task force
Boston is the worlds most sustainable source of exceptional talent. We are home to the
best institutions and amazing businesses; the future of robotics, life sciences, and energy are
developed here.
project plum
| innovation lab
YOUR HOME
project plums concierge relocation services
transportation
| your home
The City of Bostons Boston Home Center would be able to support Project Plum employees
seeking homeownership or rentals in Boston through the following incentives:
The City of Bostons Boston Home Center (BHC) will
work with Project Plum to create a homebuying match loan program. The program will work
with the existing BHC loan program to hold a Homebuying 101 (HB101) course at Project
Plum headquarters where graduates are eligible for between 3% and 5% for down payment
and closing cost assistance from the BHC loan program. Loans are zero interest deferred
loans that are forgivable and become a grant if the homeowner lives in Boston for 10 years.
boston attractions
| homeowner support
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
McGarrah, Douglas
Jay Ash (jay.ash@state.ma.us)
ABC Full Board Meeting, February 24th, 8-9:30 a.m.
Friday, January 15, 2016 11:43:37 AM
Jay:
Would you be available to address the ABC Quarterly Board Meeting, held at Nutter out here in the
Seaport, the future location of the GE headquarters, on Wednesday, February 24th, at 8-9:30 ? You
could come or leave at some point during this period, depending upon your scheduling needs.
Best,
Doug
FOLEY
HOAG LLP
Douglas M. McGarrah|Partner
Any tax advice included in this document and its attachments was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, for the
purpose of avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code.
This email message and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Foley
Hoag LLP immediately -- by replying to this message or by sending an email to postmaster@foleyhoag.com -- and destroy all copies of
this message and any attachments without reading or disclosing their contents. Thank you.
For more information about Foley Hoag LLP, please visit us at www.foleyhoag.com.
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Travis McCready
andrew.jay@siemens.com; atauntonrigby@verizon.net; Barryjj@comcast.net; csr@northbridge.com;
dalia@be4.com; david.walt@tufts.edu; dlarson174@gmail.com; fjones@broadviewventures.org;
fschoen@partners.org; gaudette@wpi.edu; "Harvey Lodish"; henry@hlhassociates.com; hillelb@2020hcp.com;
jc@synlogictx.com; jcollins11@partners.org; jimjc@mit.edu; Judy.Lieberman@childrens.harvard.edu;
kbitterman@polarispartners.com; Lita@mit.edu; osborne@vasci.umass.edu; robert.damato@tch.harvard.edu;
t.forcht-dagi@qub.ac.uk; TEARNEY@HELIX.MGH.HARVARD.EDU; "Adelene Perkins"; "Dr. Lydia Villa-Komaroff";
"Ed Benz"; Ianno, Dominick (ANF); "Marty Meehan"; Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); "Peter Parker"; Ash, Jay
(EOHED); Lepore, Kristen (ANF)
MLSC:Executive
GE and the Mass Life Sciences Center
Friday, January 15, 2016 12:35:51 PM
I would like to connect with you all about the recent news announced this week by General Electric
on their decision to relocate their corporate headquarters to Bostons Innovation District. GE
coming to Massachusetts is an enormous opportunity for the future of our innovation economy,
including our life sciences ecosystem. The Center played a key role in recruiting the Health Care/Life
Sciences headquarters of GE to a new location in Marlborough over the past two years, which
served as an important precursor to this weeks broader announcement.
Similarly, the MLSC collaborated to play a key, albeit smaller role in the GE corporate headquarters
decision. Through a dialogue led by the Baker administration on behalf of the state and the Walsh
administration on behalf of the City of Boston, GE was offered a package of incentives, investments
and opportunities that served all parties mutual interests. Included in this package was an
opportunity not offered by any other competitor state - the establishment of an Innovation
Center in Bostons Seaport District that would serve as a place where GE could collaborate with the
innovation economy writ large to advance technology and life sciences innovation. To help with the
development of the Center, the MLSC was asked to consider and I agreed to review an application
not to exceed $5 million in capital funding to support the build-out of this facility. We were clear
that this is not a commitment of funding at this stage, but rather a commitment to review a detailed
application for capital funding, with an eye toward doing our part to support an innovation
ecosystem in which GE will thrive.
I would ask that any press inquiries that you might receive about the Centers participation in the GE
transaction be referred to me or Angus McQuilken, our VP for Communications & Marketing, for
coordination of response. You can reach Angus at amcquilken@masslifesciences.com, or at 617921-7749.
Best regards,
Travis
Travis McCready
President & CEO
tmccready@masslifesciences.com
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Thanks Brendan! I really appreciate your note it was quite a process. Now that things might settle
down a bit, it would be great to catch up any dates/times over the next couple of weeks that work
for you?
Best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Mike,
I wanted to take a moment to say congrats on GE.
What a huge win for the Commonwealth --- a globally reverberating validation of our world class city, it
unique talent pool and a strong welcoming government that has demonstrated it understands that when
businesses thrive all its people will thrive. Refreshing to say the least.
Hope to see you soon.
Brendan
Brendan W. Callahan
Managing Director
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Hi Mike,
I enjoyed chatting yesterday.
Quick down and dirty answer on new construction costs in Seaport is approximately $575 per square foot,
inclusive of land costs (highly variable), site work and union labor for a high rise building WITHOUT
structured parking. Above ground structured parking is usually carried at $25K per stall and higher for
below grade parking especially close to the water.
Let me know if you need more info and send a few dates for coffee or a cocktail to follow up on our other
discussions.
Brendan
Brendan W. Callahan
Managing Director
Hi Brendan, hope you are well and had a great Thanksgiving. I had a quick question for a project we
are working on that I thought you could help with could you call me? Cell phone number below,
thanks.
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete it. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not keep, use, disclose, copy or distribute this email without the author's
prior permission. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software
viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this
message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses. The
information contained in this communication may be confidential and may be subject to the
attorney-client privilege. If you are the intended recipient and you do not wish to receive
similar electronic messages from us in the future then please respond to the sender to this
effect.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/295618493/Boston-s-Proposal-To-GE-On-Relocating-Headquarters
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Thanks! Do you by chance have one with the new cover page using the company name?
Thanks Elizabeth! Great working with you and the Massport team on this. Please see attached
this was sent with our proposal on December 1. Please let me know if you need anything else.
Best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Hi Michael, Congratulations and thank you for all of your hard work! Could you send along a copy of
the updated brochure that was sent to the Globe? Many thanks, Elizabeth
Elizabeth Morse
Chief of Staff
Massachusetts Port Authority
One Harborside Drive, Suite 200S
East Boston, MA 02128
617-568-1007
emorse@massport.com
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
You too!
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
-----Original Message----From: Morse, Elizabeth [mailto:EMorse@massport.com]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED) <Michael.kennealy@MassMail.State.MA.US>
Subject: Re: Brochure
This is it -- thanks! Have a great weekend
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development One Ashburton Place, Room
2101 Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us<mailto:michael.kennealy@state.ma.us>
From: Morse, Elizabeth [mailto:EMorse@massport.com]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 8:55 AM
To: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED)
<Michael.kennealy@MassMail.State.MA.US<mailto:Michael.kennealy@MassMail.State.MA.US>>
Subject: Brochure
Hi Michael, Congratulations and thank you for all of your hard work! Could
you send along a copy of the updated brochure that was sent to the Globe?
Many thanks, Elizabeth
Elizabeth Morse
Chief of Staff
Massachusetts Port Authority
One Harborside Drive, Suite 200S
East Boston, MA 02128
617-568-1007
emorse@massport.com<mailto:emorse@massport.com>
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Mitch Tyson
jay.ash@massmail.state.ma.us
"Stebbins, Katie (SEA)"
Resignation From the Advanced Manufacturing Collaborative
Friday, January 15, 2016 3:55:54 PM
Jay,
First I want to congratulate you on landing the GE Headquarters. This
is huge for our region and the innovation ecosystem. I didnt think it
could be done when I heard GE was looking. Kudos to you and the
Governor for pulling it off.
I am writing to resign from being co-chair of the Advanced
Manufacturing Collaborative. Ive been co-chair since the beginning of
this initiative over 4 years ago and have felt that we made a lot of
progress in raising the visibility of the manufacturing sector in Mass.
and in incorporating manufacturing programs in many state agencies.
As the program continues under Marty Jones leadership I'm confident
that the progress will continue and new co-chairs can bring some new
ideas and energy. This will allow me to focus more of my efforts on the
Executive Committee of the Mass Tech Collaborative and on other
activities I am involved in the innovation economic development
ecosystem. I look forward to continuing to work with Katie Stebbins in
these areas.
Take care,
Mitch
Mitch Tyson / Tyson Associates / mtyson@tyson.net
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Hi Scott,
Hopefully youve seen a few mentions in the press about the important role our dinner in September
played in the GE process. Jay and I really cant thank you enough, again, for your help and support
here. Were all thrilled with this outcome after many months of work it was a great team effort.
Hope we can find a time to catch up soon.
Thanks again, and all the best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Scott,
Thank you again for all your help with our event this week it was great having you there, and your
participation and comments about the Commonwealth were really helpful to our efforts. We
already have received very good feedback from the company and I know the dinner program was
an important factor. Let me know if we can be helpful with anything, and hope well have the
opportunity to connect again soon.
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
John Sullivan
Jay Ash (jay.ash@state.ma.us)
GE
Friday, January 15, 2016 4:20:44 PM
Afternoon Jay, just a quick note of congratulations on GEs decision in selecting Boston as their new
headquarters!
Wow, what a terrific job by you, Governor Baker, your staff and the City of Boston that worked on
this very important deal.
Lots of hard work to make it happen, well done!!
By way, GE Healthcare will start to occupy their first phase in Marlborough this weekend, by Monday
they will have over 300 people occupying their new office space. Their next phase of bioscience labs
is now under construction through 2016.
Enjoy the weekend Jay!
-John
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Seth Daniels
Servetnick, Adrian (SEA)
Jay (SEA) Ash
Silver Line and GE
Friday, January 15, 2016 5:36:07 PM
Hello Adrian,
With the announcement about GE relocating to the Seaport District, I had
to recall how Sec. Ash had always talked about how the Silver Line in
Chelsea would unlock the opportunities in the Seaport for Chelsea
residents. So, with GE there, and all of those possibilities to come, I
was hoping to drum up a story in the Chelsea paper about that. Do you
think Sec. Ash might be able to provide a quote along those lines for our
Chelsea paper?
Best,
Seth Daniel
Chelsea Record
857.919.4366 cell
781.284.2400 x112
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Thx, John. It was quite a ride - wow, never had so many questions asked
of me!
Great news about Marlboro - sounds like we all have reason to cheer!
Looking forward to more good stuff for us all in 2016.
Cheers,
Jay
________________________________________
From: John Sullivan [jsullivan@atlanticmanagement.com]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 4:20 PM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED)
Subject: GE
Afternoon Jay, just a quick note of congratulations on GEs decision in
selecting Boston as their new headquarters!
Wow, what a terrific job by you, Governor Baker, your staff and the City
of Boston that worked on this very important deal.
Lots of hard work to make it happen, well done!!
By way, GE Healthcare will start to occupy their first phase in
Marlborough this weekend, by Monday they will have over 300 people
occupying their new office space. Their next phase of bioscience labs is
now under construction through 2016.
Enjoy the weekend Jay!
-John
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
I think I said thanks, but just in case, thanks! Your time with Katie
will be well spent - so I appreciate that too!
________________________________________
From: Mitch Tyson [mtyson@tyson.net]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 3:55 PM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED)
Cc: Stebbins, Katie (EOHED)
Subject: Resignation From the Advanced Manufacturing Collaborative
Jay,
First I want to congratulate you on landing the GE Headquarters. This is
huge for our region and the innovation ecosystem. I didnt think it could
be done when I heard GE was looking. Kudos to you and the Governor for
pulling it off.
I am writing to resign from being co-chair of the Advanced Manufacturing
Collaborative. Ive been co-chair since the beginning of this initiative
over 4 years ago and have felt that we made a lot of progress in raising
the visibility of the manufacturing sector in Mass. and in incorporating
manufacturing programs in many state agencies. As the program continues
under Marty Jones leadership I'm confident that the progress will
continue and new co-chairs can bring some new ideas and energy. This will
allow me to focus more of my efforts on the Executive Committee of the
Mass Tech Collaborative and on other activities I am involved in the
innovation economic development ecosystem. I look forward to continuing
to work with Katie Stebbins in these areas.
Take care,
Mitch
Mitch Tyson / Tyson Associates / mtyson@tyson.net<mailto:mtyson@tyson.net>
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Chelsea Record
857.919.4366<tel:857.919.4366> cell
781.284.2400 x112<tel:781.284.2400%20x112>
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Paul Dwyer
jay.ash@massmail.state.ma.us
CEOPosting IDJ51927
Monday, January 18, 2016 3:04:53 PM
Hi jay,
Happy new year! Congratulations on the GE relocation. Sounds like a big
win for the commonwealth.
I found this posting on the website. Location most likely will not work. A
position like this in or around the greater Boston area would fit my
qualifications perfectly. If any are available, I would be most
interested.
Paul
https://jobs.hrd.state.ma.us/recruit/public/31100001/job/job_view.do?posti
ngId=J51927&code=search.public&federalStimulus=no
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
No. Just a corporate discussion. Will add this to the list to discuss in the future.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Thx!
Bruce Stebbins
Commissioner
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Jay, Mike,
Could you give me the name of someone at MassPort that we could talk to about helicopter
operations? Our transportation folks have a number of questions. Many thanks.
ark
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Janice Tatarka
Ash, Jay (EOHED)
question for you
Tuesday, January 19, 2016 11:10:14 AM
Hello Mr Secretary! Hope you are enjoying 2016 so far. Congrats on the whole GE thing. Whats
going on at the seaport is pretty amazing! If I win the lottery, Im moving there!
I was going to call but figured it would be easier to get in touch with you via email! We are working
with the folks who are redeveloping the old S. Weymouth naval air station. I know theyve been
working closely with your office. Is there a point person for this project that we could talk to if we
have any questions?
Thanks
Janice
Janice S. Tatarka
Dewey Square Group
100 Cambridge Street, Suite 1301
Boston, MA 02114
617-367-9929
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Larry Elgart
jay.ash@state.ma.us
Congrats
Tuesday, January 19, 2016 2:01:00 PM
Hi Jay:
Congratulations on the GE coup. Tremendous influx into the Commonwealth. Would love to come
meet you for lunch and catch-up. Let me know if you have an opening in your calendar. Im buying!
-- Larry -
Follow us on Twitter
Check us out on Facebook!
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Thx!
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Thx. I'll try to figure out lunch. ..I could use a session with you.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
So nice of you!
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Great story and so true of your commentary. Thx for your contributions to our great
ecosystem!
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Thx so much!
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail or its attachments.
This email and any files transmitted with it areconfidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual(s) or entity named above.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
jay.ash@state.ma.us
Walker II, Ronald L. (EOLWD)
RE: General Electric Chooses Boston for World Headquarters
Tuesday, January 19, 2016 2:18:59 PM
image001.png
image003.png
Congrats to us all!
BOSTON Governor Charlie Baker and Mayor Martin J. Walsh today celebrated
General Electric's decision to relocate their world headquarters to Boston to take
advantage of Boston and the Commonwealth's innovative and competitive economy
and access to human capital and world-class educational institutions. General Electric
will bring approximately 800 high-paying jobs to Boston with this move.
"General Electric's choice to move to Boston is the result of the city's willingness and
excitement to work creatively and collaboratively to bring positive activity to our local
economy and continue to grow our industries," said Mayor Walsh. "Boston is
delighted and honored to welcome General Electric and its employees to our
community and we are confident that this is the start of a strong partnership."
Bringing General Electric's operations to the Seaport District will cement the company
as an anchor in the city's innovation industry.The Commonwealth offered incentives
up to $120 million through grants and other programs and up to $25 million was
offered from the city of Boston in property tax relief. Additional incentives offered to
General Electric include:
$1 million in grants for workforce training;
Up to $5 million for an innovation center to forge connections between GE,
innovators from Massachusetts research institutions and the higher
education community;
Commitment to existing local transportation improvements in the Seaport
District;
Appointment of a joint relocation team to ease the transition for employees
moving to Boston;
Assistance for eligible employees looking to buy homes in Boston;
Additional details will be released as available.
###
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Should be able. One caveat is I may be meeting with the speaker. 5% chance
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Hi Rob, please see email from Ann below this is you guys, right, not Massport? If so, who would
you recommend that I put her in touch with?
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Jay, Mike,
Could you give me the name of someone at MassPort that we could talk to about helicopter
operations? Our transportation folks have a number of questions. Many thanks.
ark
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Hi MikeK,
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Mike, Jeff DeCarlo is our aeronautics administrator who, while new, knows a lot about helipads.
Jeff - mike has been talking with folks at GE who are curious about helipad issues.
Rob Garrity
Chief of Staff
MassDOT
857-368-8893 (o)
617-356-4981 (c)
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
We have several names, depending on the need. Mike and I thought we should make the first call to
whomever we decide and have them call your person, just so the introduction has been made and
the first conversation continues in the spirit of us working together on this. Make sense?
Also, we werent sure if you needed to talk to MassPort or Mass Aeronautics, so we didnt want to
have you needing to make multiple calls to get to the right person.
Jay, Mike,
Could you give me the name of someone at MassPort that we could talk to about helicopter
operations? Our transportation folks have a number of questions. Many thanks.
ark
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
That's fine. Our corporate air folks just need someone to talk to about
where we can land helicopter, any limitations, and maybe talk hangars.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 19, 2016, at 5:36 PM, Ash, Jay (EOHED)
<jay.ash@MassMail.State.MA.US<mailto:jay.ash@massmail.state.ma.us>> wrote:
We have several names, depending on the need. Mike and I thought we
should make the first call to whomever we decide and have them call your
person, just so the introduction has been made and the first conversation
continues in the spirit of us working together on this. Make sense?
Also, we werent sure if you needed to talk to MassPort or Mass
Aeronautics, so we didnt want to have you needing to make multiple calls
to get to the right person.
From: Klee, Ann (GE, Corporate) [mailto:Ann.Klee@ge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 10:35 AM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED); Kennealy, Michael (EOHED)
Subject: MassPort rep
Jay, Mike,
Could you give me the name of someone at MassPort that we could talk to
about helicopter operations? Our transportation folks have a number of
questions. Many thanks.
ark
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Hi Elizabeth, please see below from Ann Jay traded emails with her and she wants to get a contact
for their corporate air travel person to speak with. Can you tell me who you would recommend?
Thanks!
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Jay, Mike,
Could you give me the name of someone at MassPort that we could talk to about helicopter
operations? Our transportation folks have a number of questions. Many thanks.
ark
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Got it. Hope to see you tonight among the crowd of a thousand. I'll be the tall one (other than
the Governor!)!
>
> Could you give me the name of someone at MassPort that we could talk to about helicopter operations? Our
transportation folks have a number of questions. Many thanks.
>
> ark
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Morse, Elizabeth
Kennealy, Michael (SEA)
RE: MassPort rep
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 12:15:29 PM
EFreni@massport.com
-----Original Message----From: Kennealy, Michael (SEA) [mailto:michael.kennealy@state.ma.us]
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 12:13 PM
To: Morse, Elizabeth
Subject: RE: MassPort rep
Ok thanks Elizabeth. Do you have his email address?
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development One Ashburton Place, Room
2101 Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
-----Original Message----From: Morse, Elizabeth [mailto:EMorse@massport.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 10:50 AM
To: Kennealy, Michael (EOHED) <Michael.kennealy@MassMail.State.MA.US>
Subject: Re: MassPort rep
Hi Mike,
Please have them reach out to Ed Freni, Director of Aviation. He can be
reached at 617-561-1618.
Thanks, Elizabeth
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us<mailto:michael.kennealy@state.ma.us>
From: Klee, Ann (GE, Corporate) [mailto:Ann.Klee@ge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 10:35 AM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED)
<jay.ash@MassMail.State.MA.US<mailto:jay.ash@MassMail.State.MA.US>>;
Kennealy, Michael (EOHED)
<Michael.kennealy@MassMail.State.MA.US<mailto:Michael.kennealy@MassMail.State.MA.US>>
Subject: MassPort rep
Jay, Mike,
Could you give me the name of someone at MassPort that we could talk to
about helicopter operations? Our transportation folks have a number of
questions. Many thanks.
ark
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Thanks!
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Hi Ed,
Elizabeth Morse gave me your contact info she and I have been working closely on the GE deal. GE
is looking for a contact for their corporate air travel person to speak with about helicopter
operations and Elizabeth thought that you would be the right contact. I am going to send your info
over to Ann Klee from GE who headed their site selection process. Could you let me know when
you hear from someone at GE? Id appreciate it, thanks.
Best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Hi Ann, based on what you conveyed to Jay, we think the best contact is Ed Freni, Director of
Aviation at Massport. He can be reached at 617-561-1618 and his email is EFreni@massport.com. I
let him know to expect a call. Please let me know if I can help further here or if, after speaking with
Ed, you need an additional contact on this issue.
Best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
We have several names, depending on the need. Mike and I thought we should make the first call to
whomever we decide and have them call your person, just so the introduction has been made and
the first conversation continues in the spirit of us working together on this. Make sense?
Also, we werent sure if you needed to talk to MassPort or Mass Aeronautics, so we didnt want to
have you needing to make multiple calls to get to the right person.
Jay, Mike,
Could you give me the name of someone at MassPort that we could talk to about helicopter
ark
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Thanks Mike!
Hi Ann, based on what you conveyed to Jay, we think the best contact is Ed Freni, Director of
Aviation at Massport. He can be reached at 617-561-1618 and his email is EFreni@massport.com. I
let him know to expect a call. Please let me know if I can help further here or if, after speaking with
Ed, you need an additional contact on this issue.
Best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
We have several names, depending on the need. Mike and I thought we should make the first call to
whomever we decide and have them call your person, just so the introduction has been made and
the first conversation continues in the spirit of us working together on this. Make sense?
Also, we werent sure if you needed to talk to MassPort or Mass Aeronautics, so we didnt want to
have you needing to make multiple calls to get to the right person.
Jay, Mike,
Could you give me the name of someone at MassPort that we could talk to about helicopter
operations? Our transportation folks have a number of questions. Many thanks.
ark
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Secretaries -
We prepared the attached background document to provide further explanation along with the GE
MOU we still need to run by the city before doing anything with it. Most of the economic
development items have already been covered or publicized.
I spoke with Paul McMorrow and Peter about this briefly and we discussed earlier Secretary Pollack
wanted to make sure I conveyed that correctly and Steve wanted to make sure you were all good
with your respective pieces.
Thank you were hoping to get this out there today once the city has had a chance with it.
------------------------------Billy Pitman
Deputy Communications Director
Office of Governor Charlie Baker
o: (617) 725-4025 ext. 35207
c: (617) 483-3393
william.pitman@state.ma.us
As it does for Transportation Management Associations (TMA) around the state, MassDOT will
boost its support for the Seaports TMA TMAs are organizations of area business owners who
collaborate to provide shuttle services and other transportation enhancements that at a low dollar
commitment to taxpayers benefit those living and working in the Seaport.
Up to $25 million was authorized by a prior state transportation bond bill to make improvements to
sidewalks, intersections, etc. as identified by the Seaport Planning Study benefitting the district
this funding will be authorized in the upcoming FY 17 capital budget plan as improvements are
considered.
Dependent on GEs chosen site, the state will offer assistance in siting-issues relating to access to
parking and/or transit (i.e. crosswalk access to a Silver Line stop) benefitting the district and within
the parameters of the $120 million in improvements previously pledged by the state (see #1
Commonwealth Direct Economic Development Incentives).
8. Support of Energy Initiatives: Various renewable energy and energy efficiency programs are
generally available to companies (i.e. Mass Save, Mass Energy Efficiency Partnership, etc.). The state
will offer assistance in identifying which ones GE and/or their new HQ would either qualify or be eligible
to apply for.
9. Concierge Relocation Services: Previously discussed and detailed by the Commonwealth and City.
10. Temporary Office Space: The State and City will offer assistance in identifying temporary space
available for lease by GE as permanent headquarters are built.
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Thanks!
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Ed Freni
Director of Aviation
Massport Authority
Office: 617-561-1618
Hi Ed,
Elizabeth Morse gave me your contact info she and I have been working closely on the GE deal. GE
is looking for a contact for their corporate air travel person to speak with about helicopter
operations and Elizabeth thought that you would be the right contact. I am going to send your info
over to Ann Klee from GE who headed their site selection process. Could you let me know when
you hear from someone at GE? Id appreciate it, thanks.
Best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Hennessey, Amy
"Kennealy, Michael (SEA)"
Freni, Edward; Morse, Elizabeth
RE: GE
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 1:33:11 PM
Hi Mike,
Alex Dadurian, GE, just called and we are coordinating a meeting for this Friday.
Amy Hennessey
Assistant to the Director of Aviation
Aviation Division
Massachusetts Port Authority
+ One Harborside Drive, Suite 200S | East Boston, MA 02128
( 617-561-1618 (office) | 617-561-1609 (fax)
* ahennessey@massport.com
8 www.massport.com
Thanks!
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Ed Freni
Director of Aviation
Massport Authority
Office: 617-561-1618
From: Kennealy, Michael (SEA) [mailto:michael.kennealy@state.ma.us]
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 12:34 PM
To: Freni, Edward
Subject: GE
Hi Ed,
Elizabeth Morse gave me your contact info she and I have been working closely on the GE deal. GE
is looking for a contact for their corporate air travel person to speak with about helicopter
operations and Elizabeth thought that you would be the right contact. I am going to send your info
over to Ann Klee from GE who headed their site selection process. Could you let me know when
you hear from someone at GE? Id appreciate it, thanks.
Best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Thanks!
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Hi Mike,
Alex Dadurian, GE, just called and we are coordinating a meeting for this Friday.
Amy Hennessey
Assistant to the Director of Aviation
Aviation Division
Massachusetts Port Authority
+ One Harborside Drive, Suite 200S | East Boston, MA 02128
( 617-561-1618 (office) | 617-561-1609 (fax)
* ahennessey@massport.com
8 www.massport.com
Thanks!
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
Ed Freni
Director of Aviation
Massport Authority
Office: 617-561-1618
Hi Ed,
Elizabeth Morse gave me your contact info she and I have been working closely on the GE deal. GE
is looking for a contact for their corporate air travel person to speak with about helicopter
operations and Elizabeth thought that you would be the right contact. I am going to send your info
over to Ann Klee from GE who headed their site selection process. Could you let me know when
you hear from someone at GE? Id appreciate it, thanks.
Best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Thanks Mike!
Hi Ann, based on what you conveyed to Jay, we think the best contact is Ed Freni, Director of
Aviation at Massport. He can be reached at 617-561-1618 and his email is EFreni@massport.com. I
let him know to expect a call. Please let me know if I can help further here or if, after speaking with
Ed, you need an additional contact on this issue.
Best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
We have several names, depending on the need. Mike and I thought we should make the first call to
whomever we decide and have them call your person, just so the introduction has been made and
the first conversation continues in the spirit of us working together on this. Make sense?
Also, we werent sure if you needed to talk to MassPort or Mass Aeronautics, so we didnt want to
have you needing to make multiple calls to get to the right person.
Jay, Mike,
Could you give me the name of someone at MassPort that we could talk to about helicopter
operations? Our transportation folks have a number of questions. Many thanks.
ark
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Thanks Mike!
Hi Ann, based on what you conveyed to Jay, we think the best contact is Ed Freni, Director of
Aviation at Massport. He can be reached at 617-561-1618 and his email is EFreni@massport.com. I
let him know to expect a call. Please let me know if I can help further here or if, after speaking with
Ed, you need an additional contact on this issue.
Best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
We have several names, depending on the need. Mike and I thought we should make the first call to
whomever we decide and have them call your person, just so the introduction has been made and
the first conversation continues in the spirit of us working together on this. Make sense?
Also, we werent sure if you needed to talk to MassPort or Mass Aeronautics, so we didnt want to
have you needing to make multiple calls to get to the right person.
Jay, Mike,
Could you give me the name of someone at MassPort that we could talk to about helicopter
operations? Our transportation folks have a number of questions. Many thanks.
ark
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
I spoke with Paul McMorrow and Peter about this briefly and we discussed earlier Secretary Pollack
wanted to make sure I conveyed that correctly and Steve wanted to make sure you were all good
with your respective pieces.
Thank you were hoping to get this out there today once the city has had a chance with it.
------------------------------Billy Pitman
Deputy Communications Director
Office of Governor Charlie Baker
o: (617) 725-4025 ext. 35207
c: (617) 483-3393
william.pitman@state.ma.us
As it does for Transportation Management Associations (TMA) around the state, MassDOT will
boost its support for the Seaports TMA TMAs are organizations of area business owners who
collaborate to provide shuttle services and other transportation enhancements that at a low dollar
commitment to taxpayers benefit those living and working in the Seaport.
Up to $25 million was authorized by a prior state transportation bond bill to make improvements to
sidewalks, intersections, etc. as identified by the Seaport Planning Study benefitting the district
this funding will be authorized in the upcoming FY 17 capital budget plan as improvements are
considered.
Dependent on GEs chosen site, the state will offer assistance in siting-issues relating to access to
parking and/or transit (i.e. crosswalk access to a Silver Line stop) benefitting the district and within
the parameters of the $120 million in improvements previously pledged by the state (see #1
Commonwealth Direct Economic Development Incentives).
8. Support of Energy Initiatives: Various renewable energy and energy efficiency programs are
generally available to companies (i.e. Mass Save, Mass Energy Efficiency Partnership, etc.). The state
will offer assistance in identifying which ones GE and/or their new HQ would either qualify or be eligible
to apply for.
9. Concierge Relocation Services: Previously discussed and detailed by the Commonwealth and City.
10. Temporary Office Space: The State and City will offer assistance in identifying temporary space
available for lease by GE as permanent headquarters are built.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
I spoke with Paul McMorrow and Peter about this briefly and we discussed earlier Secretary Pollack
wanted to make sure I conveyed that correctly and Steve wanted to make sure you were all good
with your respective pieces.
Thank you were hoping to get this out there today once the city has had a chance with it.
------------------------------Billy Pitman
Deputy Communications Director
Office of Governor Charlie Baker
o: (617) 725-4025 ext. 35207
c: (617) 483-3393
william.pitman@state.ma.us
As it does for Transportation Management Associations (TMA) around the state, MassDOT will
boost its support for the Seaports TMA TMAs are organizations of area business owners who
collaborate to provide shuttle services and other transportation enhancements that at a low dollar
commitment to taxpayers benefit those living and working in the Seaport.
Up to $25 million was authorized by a prior state transportation bond bill to make improvements to
sidewalks, intersections, etc. as identified by the Seaport Planning Study benefitting the district
this funding will be authorized in the upcoming FY 17 capital budget plan as improvements are
considered.
Dependent on GEs chosen site, the state will offer assistance in siting-issues relating to access to
parking and/or transit (i.e. crosswalk access to a Silver Line stop) benefitting the district and within
the parameters of the $120 million in improvements previously pledged by the state (see #1
Commonwealth Direct Economic Development Incentives).
8. Support of Energy Initiatives: Various renewable energy and energy efficiency programs are
generally available to companies (i.e. Mass Save, Mass Energy Efficiency Partnership, etc.). The state
will offer assistance in identifying which ones GE and/or their new HQ would either qualify or be eligible
to apply for.
9. Concierge Relocation Services: Previously discussed and detailed by the Commonwealth and City.
10. Temporary Office Space: The State and City will offer assistance in identifying temporary space
available for lease by GE as permanent headquarters are built.
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Billy, this looks fine to us. You can say that the Innovation Center is State and City, though there is a
lot to figure out around exactly what form the Center will take.
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
I spoke with Paul McMorrow and Peter about this briefly and we discussed earlier Secretary Pollack
wanted to make sure I conveyed that correctly and Steve wanted to make sure you were all good
Thank you were hoping to get this out there today once the city has had a chance with it.
------------------------------Billy Pitman
Deputy Communications Director
Office of Governor Charlie Baker
o: (617) 725-4025 ext. 35207
c: (617) 483-3393
william.pitman@state.ma.us
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Billy, this looks fine to us. You can say that the Innovation Center is State and City, though there is a
lot to figure out around exactly what form the Center will take.
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
I spoke with Paul McMorrow and Peter about this briefly and we discussed earlier Secretary Pollack
wanted to make sure I conveyed that correctly and Steve wanted to make sure you were all good
Thank you were hoping to get this out there today once the city has had a chance with it.
------------------------------Billy Pitman
Deputy Communications Director
Office of Governor Charlie Baker
o: (617) 725-4025 ext. 35207
c: (617) 483-3393
william.pitman@state.ma.us
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Thank you adding Paul just to clear that up. I believe at least the funding part was state only?
Billy, this looks fine to us. You can say that the Innovation Center is State and City, though there is a
lot to figure out around exactly what form the Center will take.
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
We prepared the attached background document to provide further explanation along with the GE
MOU we still need to run by the city before doing anything with it. Most of the economic
development items have already been covered or publicized.
I spoke with Paul McMorrow and Peter about this briefly and we discussed earlier Secretary Pollack
wanted to make sure I conveyed that correctly and Steve wanted to make sure you were all good
with your respective pieces.
Thank you were hoping to get this out there today once the city has had a chance with it.
------------------------------Billy Pitman
Deputy Communications Director
Office of Governor Charlie Baker
o: (617) 725-4025 ext. 35207
c: (617) 483-3393
william.pitman@state.ma.us
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Thank you adding Paul just to clear that up. I believe at least the funding part was state only?
Billy, this looks fine to us. You can say that the Innovation Center is State and City, though there is a
lot to figure out around exactly what form the Center will take.
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
I spoke with Paul McMorrow and Peter about this briefly and we discussed earlier Secretary Pollack
wanted to make sure I conveyed that correctly and Steve wanted to make sure you were all good
with your respective pieces.
Thank you were hoping to get this out there today once the city has had a chance with it.
------------------------------Billy Pitman
Deputy Communications Director
Office of Governor Charlie Baker
o: (617) 725-4025 ext. 35207
c: (617) 483-3393
william.pitman@state.ma.us
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Thank you adding Paul just to clear that up. I believe at least the funding part was state only?
Billy, this looks fine to us. You can say that the Innovation Center is State and City, though there is a
lot to figure out around exactly what form the Center will take.
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
I spoke with Paul McMorrow and Peter about this briefly and we discussed earlier Secretary Pollack
wanted to make sure I conveyed that correctly and Steve wanted to make sure you were all good
with your respective pieces.
Thank you were hoping to get this out there today once the city has had a chance with it.
------------------------------Billy Pitman
Deputy Communications Director
Office of Governor Charlie Baker
o: (617) 725-4025 ext. 35207
c: (617) 483-3393
william.pitman@state.ma.us
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Lets lock in Feb 9 where? Jay has met with Udit recently and he is going to put in another call I
did tell him that you suggested a meeting with the Governor and he will take it from here. Re: GE,
will be speaking with them soon and will raise this among other things.
Best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Mike:
Glad we caught up last week, thanks for the call back. Looking forward to following a few items as
summarized:
Millipore Sigma meeting between Gov. and Udit Batra (CEO) at Bedford location.
GE follow up, point of contact and engagement with Tech Council
CoffeeI know you mentioned Tuesdays work in Concord. Can we lock in Tuesday Feb 9 or
another non-Tuesday prior (1/26 and2/2 are already booked)
Thanks!
Christopher R. Anderson
President
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Jay please see below emails hope I characterized our conversation about Millipore correctly. Re:
GE, I could ask Ann K unless we think this is not the right time.
Lets lock in Feb 9 where? Jay has met with Udit recently and he is going to put in another call I
did tell him that you suggested a meeting with the Governor and he will take it from here. Re: GE,
will be speaking with them soon and will raise this among other things.
Best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Mike:
Glad we caught up last week, thanks for the call back. Looking forward to following a few items as
summarized:
Millipore Sigma meeting between Gov. and Udit Batra (CEO) at Bedford location.
GE follow up, point of contact and engagement with Tech Council
CoffeeI know you mentioned Tuesdays work in Concord. Can we lock in Tuesday Feb 9 or
Christopher R. Anderson
President
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Jay please see below emails hope I characterized our conversation about Millipore correctly. Re:
GE, I could ask Ann K unless we think this is not the right time.
Lets lock in Feb 9 where? Jay has met with Udit recently and he is going to put in another call I
did tell him that you suggested a meeting with the Governor and he will take it from here. Re: GE,
will be speaking with them soon and will raise this among other things.
Best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Mike:
Glad we caught up last week, thanks for the call back. Looking forward to following a few items as
summarized:
Millipore Sigma meeting between Gov. and Udit Batra (CEO) at Bedford location.
GE follow up, point of contact and engagement with Tech Council
CoffeeI know you mentioned Tuesdays work in Concord. Can we lock in Tuesday Feb 9 or
Christopher R. Anderson
President
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
All,
We have a reservation for dinner tomorrow at 5:15 p.m. at Lala Rokh, 97 Mt. Vernon Street, Boston,
MA 02108, just off Charles Street, in advance of the State of the State. Looking forward to seeing
you all there.
Lon
Lon F. Povich
Governors Chief Legal Counsel
State House, Room 271
Boston, MA 02133
(617) 725-4082
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
All,
We have a reservation for dinner tomorrow at 5:15 p.m. at Lala Rokh, 97 Mt. Vernon Street, Boston,
MA 02108, just off Charles Street, in advance of the State of the State. Looking forward to seeing
you all there.
Lon
Lon F. Povich
Governors Chief Legal Counsel
State House, Room 271
Boston, MA 02133
(617) 725-4082
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
jay.ash@state.ma.us
Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Ash, Jay (EOHED)
RE: Misc. Items
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 9:31:25 PM
Lets lock in Feb 9 where? Jay has met with Udit recently and he is going to put in another
call I did tell him that you suggested a meeting with the Governor and he will take it from
here. Re: GE, will be speaking with them soon and will raise this among other things.
Best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Mike:
Glad we caught up last week, thanks for the call back. Looking forward to following a few
items as summarized:
Millipore Sigma meeting between Gov. and Udit Batra (CEO) at Bedford location.
CoffeeI know you mentioned Tuesdays work in Concord. Can we lock in Tuesday Feb 9
or another non-Tuesday prior (1/26 and2/2 are already booked)
Thanks!
Christopher R. Anderson
President
t: 781.890.6482 | m: 339-222-2881 | chris@mhtc.org
Reservoir Woods | 850 Winter Street | Waltham | MA | 02451-1420
www.mhtc.org
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Lets lock in Feb 9 where? Jay has met with Udit recently and he is going to put in another
call I did tell him that you suggested a meeting with the Governor and he will take it from
here. Re: GE, will be speaking with them soon and will raise this among other things.
Best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Mike:
Glad we caught up last week, thanks for the call back. Looking forward to following a few
items as summarized:
Millipore Sigma meeting between Gov. and Udit Batra (CEO) at Bedford location.
CoffeeI know you mentioned Tuesdays work in Concord. Can we lock in Tuesday Feb 9
or another non-Tuesday prior (1/26 and2/2 are already booked)
Thanks!
Christopher R. Anderson
President
t: 781.890.6482 | m: 339-222-2881 | chris@mhtc.org
Reservoir Woods | 850 Winter Street | Waltham | MA | 02451-1420
www.mhtc.org
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Mike will continue to be the point for you. We talk daily. Again, contact us on anything! See
you Thursday.
Hi Ann, based on what you conveyed to Jay, we think the best contact is Ed Freni, Director of
Aviation at Massport. He can be reached at 617-561-1618 and his email is EFreni@massport.com. I
let him know to expect a call. Please let me know if I can help further here or if, after speaking with
Ed, you need an additional contact on this issue.
Best,
Mike
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
We have several names, depending on the need. Mike and I thought we should make the first call to
whomever we decide and have them call your person, just so the introduction has been made and
the first conversation continues in the spirit of us working together on this. Make sense?
Also, we werent sure if you needed to talk to MassPort or Mass Aeronautics, so we didnt want to
have you needing to make multiple calls to get to the right person.
Jay, Mike,
Could you give me the name of someone at MassPort that we could talk to about helicopter
operations? Our transportation folks have a number of questions. Many thanks.
ark
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
FYI.
This was provided to the media as noted below.
Lets be sure that we all have and share the relevant documents.
All -
On Background:
Attached is the State and Citys MOU with GE as well as a background document
providing further explanation on certain sections. This document is for
background purposes only, attributable to state and city officials.
------------------------------Billy Pitman
Deputy Communications Director
Office of Governor Charlie Baker
o: (617) 725-4025 ext. 35207
c: (617) 483-3393
william.pitman@state.ma.us
As it does for Transportation Management Associations (TMA) around the state, MassDOT will
boost its support for the Seaports TMA TMAs are organizations of area business owners who
collaborate to provide shuttle services and other transportation enhancements that at a low dollar
commitment to taxpayers benefit those living and working in the Seaport.
As part of ongoing efforts to benefit the Seaport District and nearby area for all residents and
businesses, the City will continue with its plan to invest up to $100 million for local improvements,
including the Citys existing commitment to rebuild the Northern Avenue Bridge to include
pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle traffic.
Up to $25 million was authorized by a prior state transportation bond bill to make improvements to
sidewalks, intersections, etc. as identified by the Seaport Planning Study benefitting the district
this funding will be authorized in the upcoming FY 17 capital budget plan as improvements are
considered.
Dependent on GEs chosen site, the state will offer assistance in siting-issues relating to access to
parking and/or transit (i.e. crosswalk access to a Silver Line stop) benefitting the district and within
the parameters of the $120 million in improvements previously pledged by the state (see #1
Commonwealth Direct Economic Development Incentives).
8. Support of Energy Initiatives: Various renewable energy and energy efficiency programs are
generally available to companies (i.e. Mass Save, Mass Energy Efficiency Partnership, etc.). The state
will offer assistance in identifying which ones GE and/or their new HQ would either qualify or be eligible
to apply for.
9. Concierge Relocation Services: Previously discussed and detailed by the Commonwealth and City.
10. Temporary Office Space: The State and City will offer assistance in identifying temporary space
available for lease by GE as permanent headquarters are built. This process is ongoing.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
FYI.
This was provided to the media as noted below.
Lets be sure that we all have and share the relevant documents.
All -
On Background:
Attached is the State and Citys MOU with GE as well as a background document
providing further explanation on certain sections. This document is for
background purposes only, attributable to state and city officials.
------------------------------Billy Pitman
Deputy Communications Director
Office of Governor Charlie Baker
o: (617) 725-4025 ext. 35207
c: (617) 483-3393
william.pitman@state.ma.us
As it does for Transportation Management Associations (TMA) around the state, MassDOT will
boost its support for the Seaports TMA TMAs are organizations of area business owners who
collaborate to provide shuttle services and other transportation enhancements that at a low dollar
commitment to taxpayers benefit those living and working in the Seaport.
As part of ongoing efforts to benefit the Seaport District and nearby area for all residents and
businesses, the City will continue with its plan to invest up to $100 million for local improvements,
including the Citys existing commitment to rebuild the Northern Avenue Bridge to include
pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle traffic.
Up to $25 million was authorized by a prior state transportation bond bill to make improvements to
sidewalks, intersections, etc. as identified by the Seaport Planning Study benefitting the district
this funding will be authorized in the upcoming FY 17 capital budget plan as improvements are
considered.
Dependent on GEs chosen site, the state will offer assistance in siting-issues relating to access to
parking and/or transit (i.e. crosswalk access to a Silver Line stop) benefitting the district and within
the parameters of the $120 million in improvements previously pledged by the state (see #1
Commonwealth Direct Economic Development Incentives).
8. Support of Energy Initiatives: Various renewable energy and energy efficiency programs are
generally available to companies (i.e. Mass Save, Mass Energy Efficiency Partnership, etc.). The state
will offer assistance in identifying which ones GE and/or their new HQ would either qualify or be eligible
to apply for.
9. Concierge Relocation Services: Previously discussed and detailed by the Commonwealth and City.
10. Temporary Office Space: The State and City will offer assistance in identifying temporary space
available for lease by GE as permanent headquarters are built. This process is ongoing.
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Ira Jackson
Ash, Jay (EOHED)
Saia, Susan (EOHED)
Making a presentation about GE at the Commonwealth Summit
Friday, January 22, 2016 10:36:47 AM
Hey, Jay.
You're doing a super job. No surprise there, but awfully impressive.
Congrats.
As you know, the Governor is speaking at the Commonwealth Summit out in
Ashland on Friday night, January 29.
We're hoping that we can call upon you to make a brief presentation
Saturday morning, January 30, about GE. Perhaps jointly with John Barros.
A little bit of the inside backstory on how you did it, what it says about
other opportunities for collaboration, and the future of the innovation
economy. We'll be getting 5-8 minute updates from people like Linda
Pizzutti Henry on HUBWeek and it would be super if we could count on you
and John to make a short presentation on how you two worked together to
score this coup -- and what it means for the future.
Please let me know, as Mary Jo and I are trying to finalize the agenda.
Many thanks -- and count UMass Boston in on helping in any way we can with
meeting GE's needs and expectations. They are coming to a majority
minority city and we are a majority minority institution -- that also has
strengths in STEM and the environment/ energy in particular. We want to
help in any way that's useful.
Best.
Ira
Ira A. Jackson
Vice Provost
UMass Boston
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Thanks Jeff I think were good for now, but will be back in touch as needed.
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Hi MikeK,
V/R,
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
Mike, Jeff DeCarlo is our aeronautics administrator who, while new, knows a lot about helipads.
Jeff - mike has been talking with folks at GE who are curious about helipad issues.
Rob Garrity
Chief of Staff
MassDOT
857-368-8893 (o)
617-356-4981 (c)
Jeffrey DeCarlo
Administrator
MassDOT Aeronautics Division
Logan Office Center
One Harborside Dr., Ste 205N
East Boston, MA 02128-2909
Tel: (617) 412-3686
Fax: (617) 412-3679
E-mail: Jeffrey.DeCarlo@dot.state.ma.us
Website: www.mass.gov/massdot/aeronautics
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Okay with me. Just tell me what time and how long we have for the presentation. I assume no
point just a discussion. But let me know otherwise.
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Okay with me. Just tell me what time and how long we have for the presentation. I assume no
point just a discussion. But let me know otherwise.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Colleagues:
As we discussed, we want to have 2 separate weekly meetings to keep
organized about what is needed for the GE HQ relocation.
The first meeting will have the folks noted on this email. It is ok to
invite others that you think appropriate to this meeting/call. Please
look for a note from Lily to establish this call/meeting.
The second meeting will be with folks from GE and a subset of the folks on
this email as may be needed. ML Strategies will be point to set this up.
By the end of this week, we will have a tracking system in place.
Please share your questions/comments.
Best,
Steve
________________________________________
From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 3:56 PM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED); Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Daniel Koh; John Barros;
Tom Glynn; Elizabeth Morse; Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Sullivan, Jennifer F.
(ANF); Pollack, Stephanie (DOT); Garrity, Rob (DOT); Mo Cowan
Cc: Zarrella, Lily (GOV)
Subject: Call on HQ relocation tomorrow/Friday at 2 pm
Colleagues,
Congratulations!
Our collective efforts came through!
Now, there is more work to do and this is good!
Let's please have a call tomorrow at 2 pm to discuss how we are going to
organize our efforts going forward for the HQ relocation.
Lily will follow with the call information.
Here we go!
Steve and Dan
Sent from my iPhone
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
We'll talk. I'll call you this a.m. regarding the Grid of Efforts we (you) need to put together
(GE for GE). You should get something to Steve and I today.
Colleagues,
Congratulations!
Our collective efforts came through!
Now, there is more work to do and this is good!
Let's please have a call tomorrow at 2 pm to discuss how we are going to organize our efforts going forward for the
HQ relocation.
Lily will follow with the call information.
Here we go!
Steve and Dan
Sent from my iPhone
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Morse, Elizabeth
"Kadish, Steven (GOV) (steven.kadish@MassMail.State.MA.US)"; Kennealy, Michael (SEA)
<michael.kennealy@state.ma.us> (michael.kennealy@state.ma.us)
Glynn, Tom
Massport Point of Contact
Monday, January 25, 2016 9:34:22 AM
As we move forward with GE and as issues come up, I will be the point of contact for Massport. I will
bring in the appropriate staff as needed. Many thanks, Elizabeth
Elizabeth Morse
Chief of Staff
Massachusetts Port Authority
One Harborside Drive, Suite 200S
East Boston, MA 02128
617-568-1007
emorse@massport.com
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Thank you Susan! You and your team were really helpful we appreciate it!
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
Hi Mike,
At the Mass Marketing Partnership board meeting this week, Nam distributed the pitch packet for
GE. I especially liked how you tied in GEs goals and key concerns to the states assets.
Lots of work for a great win! Congrats many times over!
Best,
S
Susan Houston
Executive DirectorMassEcon
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Thanks Elizabeth!
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
As we move forward with GE and as issues come up, I will be the point of contact for Massport. I will
bring in the appropriate staff as needed. Many thanks, Elizabeth
Elizabeth Morse
Chief of Staff
Massachusetts Port Authority
One Harborside Drive, Suite 200S
East Boston, MA 02128
617-568-1007
emorse@massport.com
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Paul Matthews
Ash, Jay (EOHED)
RE: Follow up from Partnership"s January Board meeting
Monday, January 25, 2016 11:21:29 AM
Wed love to have you there, and if you want to speak just let me know but rather than tie up your
schedule with that event, weve been intending for the last few months to provide you with a
regional forum to talk about your economic development bill and Opportunities for All. With the
plan finalized and the bill coming out, it seems like the right timing for us to help with the bill and
the plans implementation by giving you a platform in the region. Hopefully you agree, and were
happy to work around your schedule to find the right venue such as a large regional employer.
And Ive wanted to drop you an email since the GE news broke to congratulate you, but I figured
youve been swamped with similar messages. So CONGRATULATIONS! I figured you missing the
Opportunities for All signing was a good indicator, but not many people could have pulled off such a
victory for the state. So thank you. And I really appreciate the news medias coverage that you did
raise opportunities outside Boston Im making sure to spread that account far and wide to counter
any inevitable complaints that theyre going to Boston.
And Im looking forward to that EACC vote, but Im sure that well have a lot more media coverage
than were used to!
So after winning IBM and GE, whats next? GM? NASA? Thats a really impressive set of wins over a
short time period!
Paul
Thank you very much for your service on the 495/MetroWest Partnership's Board of
Directors.
While you should have already received an email from Jessica with an update on
transportation issues, we also wanted to share...
Draft minutes of the January meeting are available for download here;
As Susan Nicholl mentioned at the meeting, the Partnership and the
MetroWest Tourism and Visitors Bureau have been asked to cohost a regional
briefing on a national creative placemaking grant opportunity on Jan.
27th; for more information, go online to the event page.
As David McCay mentioned, both Paul Matthews and Ed Carr are panelists at
an event onthe morning of Jan. 26th being convened by Hopkinton,
Hudson, Marlborough, Northborough, Southborough, and Westborough (or
Bouroughs +) with assistance from the Partnership; for more information or to
register go to the event page.
The current Board and ESC meeting schedule is available for download here.
We're finalizing details on several events now, but please hold the following
dates...
Feb. 22nd for a midday event with the new head of the MA Life Sciences
Center;
March 9th for an energy forum with Day Pitney;
April 12th for the Partnership's Annual State House Day
If you haven't submitted your conflict of interest disclosure form
(availablehere), please do so as soon as possible.
The new Board of Directors list is here;
Our current bylaws are here.
Thank you for your service and leadership on our Board of Directors, and if you'd
like to discuss the Partnership's work in more detail, Jessica and I would be happy
to meet with you whenever and whereever most convenient.
Paul Matthews
Executive Director
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
The 8:30am time will not work for the group. Please let me know if you are available on Tuesday
afternoons at 4:30pm.
Hi all
Please let me know if Tuesday mornings from 8:30-9:15am might work for this meeting/call.
Lily Zarrella
O: 617-725-4000
C: 617-483-3424
E: lily.zarrella@massmail.state.ma.us
Colleagues:
As we discussed, we want to have 2 separate weekly meetings to keep organized about what is
needed for the GE HQ relocation.
The first meeting will have the folks noted on this email. It is ok to invite others that you think
appropriate to this meeting/call. Please look for a note from Lily to establish this call/meeting.
The second meeting will be with folks from GE and a subset of the folks on this email as may be
needed. ML Strategies will be point to set this up.
Best,
Steve
________________________________________
From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 3:56 PM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED); Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Daniel Koh; John Barros; Tom Glynn; Elizabeth
Morse; Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF); Pollack, Stephanie (DOT); Garrity, Rob
(DOT); Mo Cowan
Cc: Zarrella, Lily (GOV)
Subject: Call on HQ relocation tomorrow/Friday at 2 pm
Colleagues,
Congratulations!
Our collective efforts came through!
Now, there is more work to do and this is good!
Let's please have a call tomorrow at 2 pm to discuss how we are going to organize our efforts going
forward for the HQ relocation.
Here we go!
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Mike Kennealy
Assistant Secretary for Business Growth
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development
One Ashburton Place, Room 2101
Boston, MA 02108
Office: 617-788-3640
Cell: 617-634-4762
michael.kennealy@state.ma.us
The 8:30am time will not work for the group. Please let me know if you are available on Tuesday
afternoons at 4:30pm.
Hi all
Please let me know if Tuesday mornings from 8:30-9:15am might work for this meeting/call.
Lily Zarrella
O: 617-725-4000
C: 617-483-3424
E: lily.zarrella@massmail.state.ma.us
Colleagues:
As we discussed, we want to have 2 separate weekly meetings to keep organized about what is
needed for the GE HQ relocation.
The first meeting will have the folks noted on this email. It is ok to invite others that you think
appropriate to this meeting/call. Please look for a note from Lily to establish this call/meeting.
The second meeting will be with folks from GE and a subset of the folks on this email as may be
needed. ML Strategies will be point to set this up.
Best,
Steve
________________________________________
From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 3:56 PM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED); Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Daniel Koh; John Barros; Tom Glynn; Elizabeth
Morse; Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF); Pollack, Stephanie (DOT); Garrity, Rob
(DOT); Mo Cowan
Cc: Zarrella, Lily (GOV)
Subject: Call on HQ relocation tomorrow/Friday at 2 pm
Colleagues,
Congratulations!
Our collective efforts came through!
Now, there is more work to do and this is good!
Let's please have a call tomorrow at 2 pm to discuss how we are going to organize our efforts going
forward for the HQ relocation.
Here we go!
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Sorry all, but 430 on Tuesdays for the next 5 weeks is booked with appointments and
surrounding appointments. Any other times?
Hi all
Please let me know if Tuesday mornings from 8:30-9:15am might work for this meeting/call.
Lily Zarrella
O: 617-725-4000
C: 617-483-3424
E: lily.zarrella@massmail.state.ma.us
Colleagues:
As we discussed, we want to have 2 separate weekly meetings to keep organized about what is
needed for the GE HQ relocation.
The first meeting will have the folks noted on this email. It is ok to invite others that you think
appropriate to this meeting/call. Please look for a note from Lily to establish this call/meeting.
The second meeting will be with folks from GE and a subset of the folks on this email as may be
needed. ML Strategies will be point to set this up.
Best,
Steve
________________________________________
From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 3:56 PM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED); Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Daniel Koh; John Barros; Tom Glynn; Elizabeth
Morse; Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Sullivan, Jennifer F. (ANF); Pollack, Stephanie (DOT); Garrity, Rob
(DOT); Mo Cowan
Cc: Zarrella, Lily (GOV)
Subject: Call on HQ relocation tomorrow/Friday at 2 pm
Colleagues,
Congratulations!
Our collective efforts came through!
Now, there is more work to do and this is good!
Let's please have a call tomorrow at 2 pm to discuss how we are going to organize our efforts going
forward for the HQ relocation.
Here we go!
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
The first meeting will have the folks noted on this email. It is ok to
invite others that you think appropriate to this meeting/call. Please
look for a note from Lily to establish this call/meeting.
The second meeting will be with folks from GE and a subset of the folks on
this email as may be needed. ML Strategies will be point to set this up.
By the end of this week, we will have a tracking system in place.
Please share your questions/comments.
Best,
Steve
________________________________________
From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 3:56 PM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED); Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Daniel Koh; John Barros;
Tom Glynn; Elizabeth Morse; Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Sullivan, Jennifer F.
(ANF); Pollack, Stephanie (DOT); Garrity, Rob (DOT); Mo Cowan
Cc: Zarrella, Lily (GOV)
Subject: Call on HQ relocation tomorrow/Friday at 2 pm
Colleagues,
Congratulations!
Our collective efforts came through!
Now, there is more work to do and this is good!
Let's please have a call tomorrow at 2 pm to discuss how we are going to
organize our efforts going forward for the HQ relocation.
Lily will follow with the call information.
Here we go!
Steve and Dan
Sent from my iPhone
Next steps
Responsibility
Due date
Notes/comments
Next steps
Responsibility
Due date
Notes/comments
Next steps
Responsibility
Due date
Notes/comments
1. Temporary office
2. Permanent site
Incentives
3. Commonwealth
infrastructure incentives
4. City property tax
incentives
5. Workforce Training
grants
6. Innovation Center
7. Energy
Corporate Air
8. Jet, helicopter parking at
Logan
9. Hangar site at Hanscom
10. Public helipad
Permitting
Next steps
Responsibility
Due date
Notes/comments
Next steps
Responsibility
Due date
Notes/comments
Next steps
Responsibility
Due date
Notes/comments
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
The first meeting will have the folks noted on this email. It is ok to
invite others that you think appropriate to this meeting/call. Please
look for a note from Lily to establish this call/meeting.
The second meeting will be with folks from GE and a subset of the folks on
this email as may be needed. ML Strategies will be point to set this up.
By the end of this week, we will have a tracking system in place.
Please share your questions/comments.
Best,
Steve
________________________________________
From: Kadish, Steven (GOV)
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 3:56 PM
To: Ash, Jay (EOHED); Kennealy, Michael (EOHED); Daniel Koh; John Barros;
Tom Glynn; Elizabeth Morse; Lepore, Kristen (ANF); Sullivan, Jennifer F.
(ANF); Pollack, Stephanie (DOT); Garrity, Rob (DOT); Mo Cowan
Cc: Zarrella, Lily (GOV)
Subject: Call on HQ relocation tomorrow/Friday at 2 pm
Colleagues,
Congratulations!
Our collective efforts came through!
Now, there is more work to do and this is good!
Let's please have a call tomorrow at 2 pm to discuss how we are going to
organize our efforts going forward for the HQ relocation.
Lily will follow with the call information.
Here we go!
Steve and Dan
Sent from my iPhone
Next steps
Responsibility
Due date
Notes/comments
Next steps
Responsibility
Due date
Notes/comments
Next steps
Responsibility
Due date
Notes/comments
1. Temporary office
2. Permanent site
Incentives
3. Commonwealth
infrastructure incentives
4. City property tax
incentives
5. Workforce Training
grants
6. Innovation Center
7. Energy
Corporate Air
8. Jet, helicopter parking at
Logan
9. Hangar site at Hanscom
10. Public helipad
Permitting
Next steps
Responsibility
Due date
Notes/comments
Next steps
Responsibility
Due date
Notes/comments
Next steps
Responsibility
Due date
Notes/comments
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Annie is sending up the receipt interoffice. It was paid from an MOBD account.
-----Original Message----From: Addivinola, Ann (EOHED)
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 1:29 PM
To: Patel, Ketav (EOHED)
Subject: FW: Scanned Documents from Admin Scanner
Hi Ketav,
Everything scanned well except for the actual sales receipt. I can make a copy and send that to you inter-office if
you like?
AA