ALL

COURSES

EXSI
200 L
6
4.316
4.474
4.368
4.105
4.053
4.684
4.105
3.125
3.556
3.313
3.600
3.308
1.889
3.368

11
10
12
11
9
8
13
9
4
2
11
6
9
4
1
9

4
6
4
6
7
6
6
5
6
6
5
6
4
3
14
6
9
6
9
2
8

3
0
2
0
1
0
2
1
0
1
5
0
5
2
0
1
1
0
0
10
2

2
0
2
0
0
2
1
1
2
3
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
0

1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0

11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

The professor informed students of

their progress.
The professor's teaching methods were
effective.

10
11
12
52.8646

4.800
4.800
4.800
4.800
4.800
4.800
4.800
4.800
4.800
4.800
4.800
4.800
3.200
3.600
3.400
3.800
3.750
1.400
3.600

5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
3
2
4
3
0
3

4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
4
2
3
1
1
0
2

3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
0

2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0

1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0

57.6000

13

4.4054

4.8000

14
15

Hartman, Jeffrey

16

Exams, assessments administered with

appropriate frequency.

Technology associated with class

instruction enhanced learning.

Textbook - From Vital Course

Component (4) to Rarely Used (1)

Regular class participation necessary

for understanding course material.

Course Rigor - From Extremely

Difficult (4) to Very Easy (1)

AVERAGE SCORE

TOTAL SCORE

Exams, assessments concentrated on

the important aspects of the class.

The professor treated students fairly.

The course was well organized.

The assignments contributed... to my

understanding of the subject matter.

4.368

12

The professor provided clear

explanations to clarify concepts.

4.550

13

The professor thoughtfully answered

questions raised by students.

4.684

14

The professor emphasized conceptual

understanding of course material.

4.364

23

Student responsibilities in this course

were defined.

4.793

The professor followed his/her stated

course (syllabus) outline.

What do you expect as a final grade? A

(4), B (3), C (2), D (1), F (0)

40

Weekly hours spent preparing for

class: Over 6 (4) to Under 1 (0)

The professor was present for all

regularly scheduled class sessions.

Course Enrollment

Submitted Surveys

Student Opinion of Instruction Summary

201320

Undergraduate Survey
Exercise Science

17

201320

Student Opinion of Instruction Summary

Undergraduate Survey
Hartman, Jeffrey
EXSI

EXSI

EXSI

EXSI

EXSI

410 D

200 E

432 K

406 B

432 M

Exercise Science
5

10

5.000
5

4.778

4.444

4.833

4.429

3.833

4.500

4.667

4.500

4.333

4.167

5.000

4.333

3.200

3.833

3.333

3.600

3.333

2.200

3.500

13

12

53.8175

4.833

4.250

4.500

4.500

4.500

4.000

4.500

4.000

3.250

3.500

4.250

3.500

3.000

3.000

3.500

3.000

3.000

1.750

2.750

49.5833

4.4848

4.667

3.000

4.000

4.000

4.000

4.000

4.000

4.000

4.000

3.000

4.000

3.000

3.000

3.000

3.000

0.000

3.000

1.000

3.000

45.6667

4.1319

49.6667

3.8056

4.667

4.000

4.667

4.667

4.667

3.667

3.667

4.000

3.667

3.667

4.667

3.667

3.000

3.667

3.000

4.000

3.000

2.667

3.667

4.1389
4

201320

Student Opinion of Instruction Summary

Undergraduate Survey
Hartman, Jeffrey

Exercise Science

10

0.16
Over 6 hrs
4 - 6 hrs
2 - 4 hrs
1 - 2 hrs
Under 1 hr

R=

ED

EE

10

0.22
Over 6 hrs
4 - 6 hrs
2 - 4 hrs
1 - 2 hrs
Under 1 hr

Course Rigor to Expected Final Grade

R=
Course Rigor

Prep Time

R=

Course Preparation to Course Rigor

Prep Time

Course Preparation to Expected Final Grade

0.35

Extremely Difficult
Difficult
Easy
Extremely Easy

14

201320

Student Opinion of Instruction Summary

Undergraduate Survey
Hartman, Jeffrey

Exercise Science

Exercise Science

Hartman, Jeffrey
20437

EXSI

200

Introduction to Exercise Sci

20 Please feel free to include any other general comments concerning your experience in this course in the space that follows.
I really enjoyed this class. Dr. Hartman is an awesome teacher. I feel like I learned a lot.
20463

EXSI

200

Introduction to Exercise Sci

2 The course was well organized.

Most of the time I had no idea what to do or what we were doing exactly in class. We had the sylabus, but all it had was a title, how was I suppose to know how to do the
assignment to my fullest if it was never explained?
3 The professor followed his/her stated course (syllabus) outline.
very much so about when assignments were due
4 Student responsibilities in this course were defined.
the assignments were on the syllabus but were not always explained clearly as to what was expected of the assignment
5 The professor treated students fairly.
I personally felt like I was being looked at differently from everyone else in the class because he did not consider cheer leading a sport,
volleyball. So therefore I was looked at like I was a lot less atheltic than everyone else. I just really felt out of place in that class. Not an enjoyable experince at all.
6 The professor emphasized conceptual understanding of course material.
Veryy confusing.
7 The professor thoughtfully answered questions raised by students.
People would ask questions, but most the time it seemed like he never had an answer for them. He would change the subject or beat around the bush.
8 The professor provided clear explanations to clarify concepts.
I think the more he tried to explain it the more confusing it got.

like

he

did

soccer,

baseball,

or

201320

Student Opinion of Instruction Summary

Undergraduate Survey
Hartman, Jeffrey

Exercise Science

9 The assignments contributed meaningfully to my understanding of the subject matter.

I did not understand the assignments, so it was hard to grasp the concept of what we were doing in class.
20 Please feel free to include any other general comments concerning your experience in this course in the space that follows.
The content was good but the professor was overly meticulous with many assignments and overlooked things I did include that the rubric required if it wasn't spelled out.
Also, there were frivolous requirements like writing "pledge" on the back of all of our assignments in order to not lose points, even though by enrolling in GWU we accept
the honor code anyway.
20468

EXSI

432

Seminar in Exercise Science

9 The assignments contributed meaningfully to my understanding of the subject matter.

the Coursera online class was mainly a waste of time that ended up being just an added source for stress
21611

EXSI

432

Seminar in Exercise Science

2 The course was well organized.

All of the assignments were clumped together
second half of the semester so it was weird.

and

were

all

due

at

the

same

time

which

made

it

very

difficult

to

keep

track

of

them.

Then

there

was

nothing

due

in

the

4 Student responsibilities in this course were defined.

Kind of, for the most part yes.
6 The professor emphasized conceptual understanding of course material.
I wasn't 100% sure what the point of the class was
8 The professor provided clear explanations to clarify concepts.
Not really. He used an online class as an attempt to do that and it didn't work.
9 The assignments contributed meaningfully to my understanding of the subject matter.
Some of them helped, but most of the assignments were busy work that distracted from being able to do the important assignments well. The coursera class was
completely unnecessary. If I'm already paying $35,000 a year to go to this university, why do I need to take a class from another university taught by someone else on
something my professor could have taught me? Plus all the other assignments were due at the same time as the online class was being done so it was difficult to manage
all the assignments at one time. The only helpful assignment was the research proposal. which was organized well.

201320

Student Opinion of Instruction Summary

Undergraduate Survey
Hartman, Jeffrey

Exercise Science

9 The assignments contributed meaningfully to my understanding of the subject matter.

There were so many assignments sometimes it was difficult to learn the material.
10 Exams and other assessments concentrated on the important aspects of the class.
We did not have tests, only the research proposal paper. Which was on our own. We actually did not have a lot of actual course material.
11 The professor informed students of their progress.
I appreciated the emails with grade updates.
13 The course was:
It was challenging, but
about quantity not quality

horribly

organized.

There

were

bunch

of

unnecessary

assignments

that,

if

removed,

would

give

the

class

higher

quality.

feel

like

the

class

was

14 Regular class participation was necessary for understanding course material.

You had to be in class to know what he wanted from all the assignments
15 The text used in this course was:
No textbooks, just books we were supposed to read
19 The final grade I expect to receive in this class is:
Let's hope. It's difficult to make yourself do work that seems pointless. So it was hard to complete most of the work for this class.
20 Please feel free to include any other general comments concerning your experience in this course in the space that follows.
I appreciated everything we did in class, but there were so many assignments that sometimes it was a challenge just to keep up.

In regard to the service learning project, if Dr. Hartman wanted it to be a class thing where both classes did the same thing at the same time, he should have organized it.
It should have been on an individual basis because everyone is busy and people don't always have the same time frames available. Making it on an individual basis would
help the student. In general, there are too many out of class assignments. It adds a lot of extra unnecessary time to the course. Dr. Hartman did a good job of not having
class on certain days where our time was needed elsewhere, but even then, most of the class is done outside of class. It might as well just be an online course

Dr. Hartman is a great teacher and I learned a lot from seminar, good and bad. I learned that Research is not for me but I also learned how to handle taking on the real
world.

Student Opinion of Instruction Summary

201320

Undergraduate Survey
Hartman, Jeffrey

Exercise Science