Professional Documents
Culture Documents
beliefs are centered on the idea of finding the meaning of life through different choices and
situations. Many authors use bizarre circumstances to portray existentialist ideas. Franz Kafka,
the author of The Metamorphosis, adapted this tactic into his book, and created one of the first
books to incorporate the existentialist belief. The Metamorphosis makes use of several different
Generally, existentialists have a set of rules which they follow. For instance, free will is
a central idea, but there is no belief in a common good within people. As Max Bense wrote, “In
existential analysis man is the subject, the foundation, in relation to whom everything becomes
intelligible and interpretable.” They believe that there are things that are not rational, yet
religion is ridiculous and should not be taken into account. In, addition, science will not benefit
the world and wealth does not define how successful a person’s life is. Most importantly,
though, is the belief against a governing set of rules or code, as existentialists such as Kafka feel
that these rules and codes restrict individualism, thus transforming a person into an object. In
insect.
“When Gregor Samsa woke up one morning from unsettling dreams, he found himself
changed in his bed into a monstrous vermin,” (Kafka, 3). Without any background information,
Kafka thrusts his main character, and the reader thusly, into the precarious situation of becoming
a bug. No explanation is suggested as to why or how, only that it has happened. The author
seems to be jesting at situations that people generally typify as being out of their control. This is
because as an existentialist, he believes that choice defines a person, not external circumstances.
While Gregor cannot control his transformation, he does have the free will to get out of his bed
and pursue his normal activities. However, he struggles to overcome the challenge that his
laziness presents, telling himself that he will get up at a certain time, but passing each time he
sets without so much as a movement. This lack of motivation seems to stem from Gregor’s
obvious lack of an identity. By this, it is meant that before the metamorphosis, Gregor worked
terribly hard for his family to pay off bills from an unexplained failure of the family business.
He allowed little to no time for his own improvement, and consequently lost his individuality.
The author follows the common existentialist belief supporting the “self,” and shows the dangers
of working for others without taking into account one’s own needs. Kafka fears above all losing
individualism.
Fortunately, Kafka allows Gregor to pursue a goal, which, although not for Gregor
himself, helps lead Gregor to motivate himself to work harder and longer. “He has had a
peculiar love for this violin-playing sister, was fascinated even to the end by her playing, and had
even hoped to provide for her musical education at the Conservatory,” (Webster). Grete, his
sister, provided Gregor with his only glimmer of hope to gaining an identity before he became
the horrible insect. The change, however, disallows any chance of Grete attending the
Conservatory. With this, Gregor loses his drive to work and live, instead choosing to hide out in
his room and waste away. The fact that he can no longer send his sister to a higher education
only causes Gregor to fall farther and farther away from his human self, instead gradually
choosing to accept his primitive instincts as an insect. By rejecting his former self, Gregor
thereby rejects his individuality. Kafka sets the standard for future existentialists in this way by
showing the trouble that goes with accepting circumstances and not fighting to overcome
adversity.
Gregor also portrays another existentialist idea through Kafka’s writing. The belief that
there are things that are irrational and illogical is a central point in the novel. The obvious issue
that defies the bounds of the real world is that of the actual transformation of Gregor. Kafka
speaks of the change with such ease that he makes it seem as though such a bizarre event could
in fact take place. “The existential mode of analysis thus remains basically indifferent to the
classical distinction between possible and realized, real and unreal worldism and accordingly
does not know the explicit problem of objective reality,” (Bense). The change is tragic in the
story, as it hurts not only Gregor, but also the whole family. However, some good does come out
of the situation. “With the metamorphosis, a principle of alienation, the "pure self"... takes
possession of Gregor, automatically topples the usurpatory son from his position of power in the
family, and returns the father to his former task,” (Sokel). Where Gregor used to have to work
and care for the family, the metamorphosis forced the father to go back to work, along with the
sister and the mother doing random jobs. Aside from the sister, the father should be the
breadwinner of the family, not the son. For the two to switch places in fact shows justice for
Gregor. He has already worked many hours to take care of his family at his own individuality’s
sake, and now it is time for his family to return the favor.
The situation also causes a few problems within the family as well. Grete takes on the
responsibility of caring for Gregor in his bug state, doing things such as cleaning after him,
putting food out, and moving his furniture in order to enable him to move around easier.
Unfortunately, Gregor’s mother refuses even to come into his room except for one time, showing
how much pain she feels for losing her only son in such a way. Gregor himself loves his mother,
and a possible Oedipus complex is present, which would explain some of his psychological
problems such as dealing with stress. (Kaiser). On the other hand, Gregor and his father do not
seem to be in good favor with each other. The father is likely angered more at the fact of his
having to return to work and having lost a moneymaking child than he is at actually losing a son.
The tension builds between the two enough that Gregor’s father throws an apple into the back of
Gregor. The apple partially paralyzes him and brings about his death much sooner. Due to the
problem, a large burden is placed on each of the family members. However, the weight that had
formerly been placed on Gregor’s back was now on his father, mother, and sister’s back. The
new burden placed on Gregor’s back was one of pain, sorrow, and the hatred of himself for
forcing his family to take care of him. He felt so depressed from these things that he decided to
stop eating completely in order to kill himself, believing that it would aid his family and take at
least some of the burden off of their shoulders if he was not burning through their resources
without supplying any money to make up for it. Kafka brings this up because as horrible as it
may be, it is true that the family was much better off without Gregor than with him. The entire
family, by the end, did not feel as though the giant insect taking up a room in their house was
Gregor anymore. They felt that he was simply not part of the family, and when he died, the
family grieved, but soon found the good in the situation. The weight, they felt, had been lifted
existentialism is to take on responsibility without the need to be told by laws or rules to do it. By
taking care of Gregor, Grete fulfills this requirement. She makes decisions which benefit the
whole of the family, and that defines her nature as a kind and responsible person. She puts her
family first, but unlike Gregor, she willfully completes the tasks and does not restrain her
individuality. She maintains her uniqueness through her playing of the violin, something of
which she excels at in Gregor’s eyes. However, in the eyes of some men who are renting out
part of the house, her talent is nothing special. Gregor becomes enraged at this disrespect,
reveals himself from his room, and advances upon the men. Gregor’s father attempts to shield
the creature from the intrigued gentlemen, knowing what may come of the situation.
Before Gregor realized what he was doing, his instincts took over in his attempt to protect
his family. His instincts have always been to try to do what is best for his family, but a growing
problem throughout the story was simply the ever-increasing disconnect between his conscious
mind and his sub-conscious mind. The conscious mind creates Gregor’s human thoughts, where
he uses logic and reason to make decisions. The sub-conscious mind contains the instinctual
habits which Gregor’s bug-like form uses to react to events. “‘The Metamorphosis’ consists in
the self’s gradual reduction to its most vital center – its self-consciousness,” (Freedman). This
Existentialists believe that social perceptions do not control the individual. The conscious mind
is the one that contains a knowledge base of these social principles. Therefore, the author must
imply that the sub-conscious mind controls the individual and uses instinct and impulses to make
choices. The impulses which overtook his mind and led him to advance upon the roomers only
ended in disaster for the family, as the once curious men soon become horrified, give notice of
their leaving, and proclaim that they shall not pay for staying in the house. When Gregor
realized his mistake, his shame overtook him and will to live diminished even further, and soon
there after the injury he sustained from his father began to take a fatal turn.
main character’s surroundings. However, according to Friedrich Beissner, “It would be wholly
impossible for the writer even to intimate that this metamorphosis is only the delusion of the sick
thing. This is because it would imply that Gregor is actually living in a realistic world, when
meaning of the book to infer that Gregor Samsa’s transformation was simply a dream. In
contrast, though, the bug could in fact be a metaphor. Wilhelm Emrich argued that the insect is
actually the “self…a nightmare that cannot be a reality.” This could incorporate the first line of
the story, in which Gregor Samsa woke from his troubled dreams. The rest of the story could
throughout the world. Franz Kafka portrayed his own views in his book, establishing a part of
the new philosophy. He used bizarre occurrences to outline his own beliefs, while not subjecting
the reader to blatant advertisement. Kafka used his main characters to outline his point as they
progressed throughout the story, especially using Gregor’s tragic transformation to reveal why
existentialist ideas were so important. A genius at his craft, Franz Kafka’s work will continue to
Works Cited
Beissner, Friedrich. Der Erzahler Franz Kafka. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1952. Print.
Bense, Max. Die Theorie Kafkas. Cologne and Berlin: Kiepenheuer und Witsch, 1952. Print.
Emrich, Wilhelm. Franz Kafka. Trans. Sheema Z. Buehne. N.p.: Frederick Ungar, 1968. Print.
Freedman, Ralph. Modern Fiction Studies. Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue Research Foundation,
1962. Print.
Sokel, Walter H. Franz Kafka: Tragik und Ironie. Munich and Vienna: Albert Langen, Georg
Webster, Peter Dow. American Imago. Ed. George B. Wilbur. N.p.: n.p., 1959. Print.
Kafka, Franz. The Metamorphosis. 7th. New York, NY: Bantam Books, 1972. Print