MICHAEL BURAWOY
Antinomian Marxist
Michael Burawoy has taught atthe University of California, Berkley, since 1976.
He has studied industrial workplaces in different parts ofthe world — Zambia, Chi-
cago, Hungary and Russia—through participant obsoraton, fom which vantage
point he has tried to cast light on the nature of pestoloniatism, on the organiza
tion of consent to capitalism, on the peculiar forms of working-class consciousness
«and work organization in state socialism, and, finaly, on the dilemmas of transi-
tion fiom socialism to capitaliem. He has developed theoretically driven method-
lies, in particular “the extended cese method.” that allow him to draw brood
conclusions from ethnographic research. Throughout hs sciologial career he has
engaged with Marxism, seeking to reconsiruct it in the light of his research and
more broadly in the light ofthe historical challenges ofthe late twentieth century.
[kis my impression that Me. Burawoy is barnpered intellectually by excesive and
tuncalstie preoccupation with what he regards as conflts between himself and
the prevailing trends of sociological analysis in the United States. He seems to
"ink that he must stragele to prevent himself rom being overpowered or seduced
by “mainstream sociology” At the rame time, have not ever detected any origi-
ality on Ms. Burewoy’ part in analyses whic he has made from the standpoint
which he regards as dsfsroured in American sociology... [tight that there is
no spark of originality in him, or it ight be that he is holding tin reserve. Since,
however, I have known him for «longtime and he has never hesitated to express
bis opinions to me on a wide variety of poitial and other subjects, {would inline
toward the former hypothesis... When I fat met him, T was very much struck by
AnTINoMtaN stancisT | 49
his initiative, He knew nothing about sociology, and he knew nothing about India,
but he stuck out on his own, and that seemed to me tobe admirable and worthy
‘ofencouragement. In the Department of Sociology he ha done well in his exami
nations... In seminars, Lhave been more struck by an obstinate conventionality
and 2 fer of being led into paths which might det his rather simple view of so-
Ciel. Itis a great pty beeause he obviously likes to do ceteach and he isnot inhib-
ited when it comes to writing, He also as a very good LQ. But somehow, either
the security of sectarianism ora juvenile antinomianism seems to have got the bee
terof him, Ist noticed the later in Cambridge. At tha ime he was an under-
graduate and I thought it would pass. Thus far tha no
éwacd Sh (975)
(One is not bor but, rather, becomes a Marxist. One becomes a Marxist, in part,
through the daranation of others. As woman is to man so Marxism is to
ogy —ils excluded, marginalized, calurnniated, fabricated, silenced, and mythol-
ogized Other, fastas man needs woman, sociology needs Marxism to ident
self, to give meaning to its own existence. Without its Other, sociology loses its
reason for being, its originality, and its vitality. But Manxism is not just made by
‘others, for others. also makes itself. [made my Marxism not by abstention from
the world but by entering its bowels—mine shafts, machine shops, stel mills,
champagne distilleries, and furniture factories in Zambia, the United States,
Hagary, and Russia, under eapitalism and so
iam, colonialism and posteolo-
Bilis, I translated my experiences not into a party ideology but for an ongoing
and open Manas tradition, forged inthe political trenches of academe. Within
this feld of domination, together with teachers and students, frends and ene-
mies, lovers and colleagues, [ have rotated between the reconstruction of Mars-
fmm and the critique of sociology. If my Marxism has so far been from the work-
ing class, now the question is whether it can also be for the working class.
Preludes to Maraismn
Its difcultto know how one’ social origins shape one’ future. My mothers fam-
ily fed Petzograd when she was thirteen, soon after the 1917 revolution.! My fa-
2. Daring Word War I, St. Peterburg was renamed Petrograd,» more Rusia sounding name. A
te Lenin ded in voy itBeosme Leningrad. After the fall ofthe Soret Union the grandeur ofthe
nineteenth century city was relled wi the esoration fs ld name,go | Mromaxs punawor
ther, conversely left ealier in igi, He grew up in the Eastern Ukraine in Yeka-
tarinslay,« city that would later become the huge Soviet military industrial
‘complex of Driiepropetrvsk, Both families escaped to Germany, and my parents
ret in Leipzig while they wore univensty students, They fed the Nazi regime
for England in 1933. Before they left, they both had received doctorates in chem-
istry but only my father was to use is degree for employment in England, He be-
came a lecturer in organic chemistry at the Manchester College of Sctence and
“Technology. We lived a lower-middle-classlfe on the south side of Manchester.
‘As foreigner anid Jew, with a charming but immodest style, my father never
adapted tothe English academic scene. His proclamation of communist sympa
thies, perhaps prompted by his disaffection, only deepened his estrangement. As
Tong as my father was alive, ray mother stayed at home to look after my sists,
leven yests my senior, and me.
‘When I was eleven my father died quite suddenly ofa heartattack. My mother
found a job as a technician in a cancer hospital and then as a Russian teaches.
We had litle money and so she took in lodgers —iwo ata time —so that our small
semidetached house was always overflowing. Mainly doctoral students, they came
from all over the world —fiom Fiance, Italy, Germany, and a whole tribe rom
Greece but aso fiom much farther afield: Hong Kong, Israel, Pakistan, India, Jo-
pan, Brazil, Pera, and Poland. They were devoted to my mother, appreciating her
spontaneous and irresistible hospitality. She made a home for them and they be-
came like family. Even ifzz Queensway wasa veritable United Nations, I eat say
it cultivated my sociological sensibility Peshaps, it made me curious about the
reat ofthe world. I the sociological spark was there it was latent, since in those
days I had only two passions soccer and astronomy—and the rest could go
the dogs. My mother cared only about my performance at schoo, and, under her
‘watchful eye, {lowered in mathematics. Trying to live up to her hopes end be-
Tieving mathematics was necessary fora career in astrophysics, I worked hard.
‘All this changed when I took of for New York in 1965 atthe age of seventeen
In those days “America” was very far avay, but remoteness was the appeal.
found a place on 2 Norwegian cargo boat bound for Philadelphia, and thus be-
¢gan my si-month interlude between school and university. It was the era of evi
rights, of the fie speech movement, the beginnings of the ativar movement
and sins. I watched from the sidelines but the American impression was deep.
Temurtured a restless optimism. { returned to face three dismal years of mathe-
‘matics at Cambridge. I had so specialized in high school that L wa fit For noth-
ANTINoMIAN Manxts” [52
ing else. I did experiment with economics, buthere, too, Mound lectures tedious.
Aer Ancien Caetg ns gunna tomtom ere
engagement with a world I could recognize as “real.” I could think only of es
cape. Four-month summer vacations and a short three-year degree were, there
fore, Cambridge’ saving grace. Convinced that education was the world’ pana-
cea (had Icons imbibed this rom my parent serfs, thelr obseion
with my ovn education?) and students its revolutionary force (had Berkeley, even
‘ta distance, already rubbed off on me?), I ventured forth to South Afica in
1966, at the end of my frst year at university If university education was beyond
their grap, might black South Afticans benefit fora correspondence education?
‘What about an Open University for Aftca? ‘These were the questions that ln-
gered in my mind as I set off to hitcbhike through the rest of Africa
| devoted the next academic year to preparing for my trip to India in the sume
‘mer. This time I would be better organized and more focused. For no other rea-
son than it seemed important an practical, decided to explore the question of
the appropiate language of instruction in higher education. had discovered the
issue in a Fabian pamphlet. [could nd no one interested in such matters under
Cambridge's dreamy spires, except for a bespectacled, whiteheired, podgy old
‘man, ensconced in spacious rooms in Kings College. There, buried in books and
pes behind what were ste thickest doable don, was the ditnguied
werican soctelogist, renowned anticommunist, and the most learned man
he ve eto Sh tein new eign
that he was supposed tobe interested in Indian intellectuals Curious that an une