,'*3Lbfierlniihkm^]hg^&pZrleZ[

Fire:
Check adequacy of section for 1 hour fire resistance (i.e. REI 60).
Thickness, hs,min = 80 mm cf. 175 mm proposed
= OK
Axis distance, amin = 20 mm cf. 25 + f/2 = 31 i.e. not critical = OK

EC2-1-2:
4.1(1), 5.1(1)
& Table 5.8

= choose cnom = 25 mm

3.1.3 Load combination (and arrangement)

Ultimate load, n:
By inspection, BS EN 1990 Exp. (6.10b) governs
= n = 1.25 5.9 + 1.5 3.3 = 12.3 kN/m2

Fig. 2.5
ECO:
Exp. (6.10b)

3.1.4 Analysis
Design moment:
MEd = 12.3 4.82/8 = 35.4 kNm
Shear force:
V = 12.3 4.8/2 = 29.5 kN/m

3.1.5 Flexural design

Effective depth:
d = 175 25 12/2 = 144 mm
Flexure in span:
K = MEd/bd2fck = 35.4 106/(1000 1442 30) = 0.057
z/d = 0.95
z = 0.95 144 = 137 mm
As = MEd/fydz = 35.4 106/(137 500/1.15) = 594 mm2/m
(r = 0.41%)

Fig. 3.5
Appendix A1
Table C5

Try H12 @ 175 B1 (645 mm2/m)

3.1.6 Deflection
Check span-to-effective-depth ratio.
Basic span-to-effective-depth ratio for r = 0.41% = 20
As,prov/As,req = 645/599 = 1.08
Max. span = 20 1.08 144 = 3110 mm i.e. < 4800 mm
Consider in more detail:
Allowable l/d = N K F1 F2 F3
where
N = 25.6 (r = 0.41%, fck = 30 MPa)
K = 1.0 (simply supported)
F1 = 1.0 (beff/bw = 1.0)
F2 = 1.0 (span < 7.0 m)
F3 = 310/ ss 1.5

Appendix B
Table 7.4N & NA
Exp. (7.17)
= no good

Cl. 7.4.2,
Appendix C7,
Tables C10-C13

37