Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
source (Gfroerer, 2006). Specifically, after an optical source excites valence bound electrons into
the conduction band of a material, the electrons relax down to their ground state and generate a
photon equal in energy to the electrons transition. The energy of these photons is then used to
determine the band structure of a given a material, including bandgap(s), heavy/light hole
transitions, etc. (Shen, 2013). PL measurements can also be used to provide information on
crystal quality; specifically, PL is used to highlight crystalline defects within the material. Due to
its ease of use and non destructive procedure, PL measurements are an attractive characterization
technique in situations where material availability is limited, the material is fragile, or has an
electrically resistive surface (and as such contacting the material is difficult). For samples that do
not produce strong emission, cooling the material to low temperatures (<77K) is often employed
to increase the strength of the signal (Gfroerer, 2006).
To conduct PL measurements, an optical excitation source (such as a laser), is needed to
pump electrons into the conduction band, and a detector is needed to examine the resultant
emitted light. Crucially, the energy of the laser must be greater than the bandgap of the material,
(so that excited electrons are able to reach the conduction band from the valence band The
range of the detector must be in the expected emission of the material.
One type of detector apparatus is a combination of a photodiode and a monochromator.
The monochromator splits light into discrete wavelengths and the intensity is then read by the
photodiode. In this way, the photodiode does not measure the wavelength of light it is measuring,
only its intensity, while the monochromator is not aware of the intensity of light passing through
it, only its wavelength. By interfacing both of these devices, a spectra showing wavelength
versus intensity can be obtained from the samples emitted light. Most photodiodes return a
voltage output linearly proportional to the intensity of incident to the sensor, while many
monochromators are controlled by some variant of a serial connection. Many spectrometers that
employ the photodiode/monochromator method of detection are sold either together or are able
to interface with larger, proprietary control hardware.
Within the last few years, new advancements in microcontrollers have made possible
robust, inexpensive computing power. One such device is the Arduino Mega, a type of
microcontroller board that runs on an ATmega 2560 processor at 16Mhz. The board is used all
over the world from projects ranging from blinking a light bulb to autonomously driving cars.
The boards fast clock speed and robust processor make it ideal for the collection of
Fig. 1 The layout of the hardware setup. The blue line is the beam path of the excitation laser,
while the green line is the beam path of the samples emission. Not pictured: Lock-in pre
amplifier, Ge detector.
Description of system control and data processing chain:
Two programs ran in parallel to support the operation of the spectrometer. The first ran on
the Arduino and handled raw data processing while the second ran on a laptop computer and
handled the data analysis and display. The Arduino based code accepted serial commands from
the computer. These commands instructed the Arduino to run a specific program. For example,
one program allows the user to measure light intensity from a given starting wavelength to an
ending wavelength and then returns a graph of emission intensity versus emission wavelength for
that range. Once a program was selected, the Arduino would pass raw data points back through
the serial line to be analyzed on the laptop computer. The program on the laptop was written in
MatLab and used the MatLab graphical user interface builder to create a user interface for
controlling the spectrometer. Both the Arduino and computer based programs communicated at
9600bps, and it was found to be sufficient for the data transfer. The Arduino based program
utilized the Arduinos onboard persistent EEPROM memory to keep track of the
monochromators current position. This was done so that the Arduino would maintain the most
accurate value of the monochromators position in case of a power failure or other critical
failure. A physical display readout on the monochromator was used to calibrate the Arduinos
EEPROM with the location of the monochromator before each measurement to ensure the most
accurate results. The position data was stored, read and written in raw motor steps. This has the
advantage of allowing the user to configure a single constant to change monochromator gratings.
The system was calibrated before each test to ensure precise results. The graphical user interface
performed 4 major functions: scanned, read intensity, moved the monochromator to a certain
wavelength and calibrated the monochromator.
Fig. 2 The graphical user interface located on the operating laptop computer. It provided a single
interface for users to calibrate the monochromator, retrieve and set the monochromators position,
measure the intensity of light being received by the photodiode, and scan the spectra of a sample
over a given wavelength interval. The preview window could be expanded for further
investigating and saved to a text file for import into a more robust plotting software.
Fig. 3 PL of a red diode laser, with a manufactured operating wavelength of 635nm. The peak of
the luminescence occurred at 636.5nm and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) is 4nm. The
intensity has been normalized to one.
Fig. 4 PL a GaAs substrate. The peak of the luminescence occurs at 885nm and the FWHM was
72nm. There was no observation of secondary peaks in the spectra, although small lumps were
present to the right of the peak. The intensity was normalized to one.
Discussion
A photoluminescence spectroscopy setup was successfully developed that was able to
conduct spectral measurements into infrared wavelengths. The emission wavelength of the red
diode laser (636.5nm) observed in figure 1 was in very good agreement with the manufacturers
classification (635nm). The 0.3% difference between the expected and observed value is well
within the margin of error introduced by impurities in the the crystals. The very sharp peak, 4nm
width at half maximum observed in figure 1 is indicative of a diode laser and confirms that the
10
References
Arthur, J. R. (2002). Molecular beam epitaxy. Surface Science, 500(1-3), 189-217.
doi:10.1016/s0039-6028(01)01525-4
Braunstein, R. (1959). Intervalence band transitions in gallium arsenide. Journal of Physics and
Chemistry of Solids, 8, 280-282. doi:10.1016/0022-3697(59)90337-3
Garcia, T. A., Hong, S., Tamargo, M., Jesus, J. D., Deligiannakis, V., Ravikumar, A., . . . Shen, A.
(2013). Improved electrical properties and crystalline quality of IIVI heterostructures for
quantum cascade lasers. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology
B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures, 31(3). doi:10.1116/1.4803837
Gfroerer, T. H. (2006). Photoluminescence in Analysis of Surfaces and Interfaces. Encyclopedia
of Analytical Chemistry Applications, Theory and Instrumentation.
doi:10.1002/9780470027318.a2510
Shen, A., Ravikumar, A. P., Chen, G., Zhao, K., Alfaro-Martinez, A., Garcia, T., . . . Gmachl, C.
(2013). MBE growth of ZnCdSe/ZnCdMgSe quantum-well infrared photodetectors. J.
Vac. Sci. Technol. B Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and
Nanometer Structures, 31(3). doi:10.1116/1.4794383
11