Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Language:
Appropriate Language
Person-First
Language
Examples:
Pros:
(Liddle, 2003)
(Liddle, 2003)
(Green, 2016)
Disability-First
Language
Examples:
Disabled
person
Au.s.c
person
Deaf
person
Results
Pros:
Disability
is
seen
as
part
of
iden.ty
Acknowledges
societys
marginalizing
role
Cons:
Cons:
Preferences:
Preferences:
Academic
journals
Disability
organiza.ons
Legal
system
Deaf
society
Some
au.s.c
and
visually
impaired
people
References:
Collier,
R.
(2012).
Person-rst
language:
Noble
intent
but
to
what
eect?
CMAJ:
Canadian
Medical
Associa0on
Journal.
184(18).
Retrieved
from
hhp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ar.cles/PMC3519177/.
Disability
rights
programming
(2016).
Disability
language
and
assump.ons
workshop
[Online
image].
Disability
Network
Southwest
Michigan.
Retrieved
from:
hhp://www.dnswm.org/disability-language-assump.ons-workshop/.
Granello,
D.
H.,
&
Gibbs,
T.
A.
(2016).
The
power
of
language
and
labels:
The
mentally
ill
versus
people
with
mental
illnesses.
Journal
of
Counseling
and
Development:
94.
Green,
Laura.
(2016).
Why
you
should
stop
saying
the
r-word
[Online
image].
Odyssey
Online.
Retrieved
from:
hhp://theodysseyonline.com/bridgewater-state/should-stop-saying-word/330481
Liddle,
K.
(2003).
Models
of
disability
[Online
image].
Taxi
Driver
Training
Pack.
Retrieved
from:
hhp://www.ddsg.org.uk/taxi/medical-model.html.
Number
of
subjects
with
this
preference
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Both
are
acceptable
Au.sm
Disability
Intellectual
Disability
word
inserted
in
scenario
Disability
Conclusions
In
each
scenario,
there
was
a
strong
preference
for
person-rst
language.
Due
to
the
limita.ons
of
this
study,
these
results
are
not
generalizable
but
may
inform
a
larger
future
study.
Person-rst
language
can
be
used
as
a
default,
general
language
op.on
for
people
with
IDD,
while
s.ll
respec.ng
specic
individual
preferences
within
and
across
disability
groups.