Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Notebook
Lauren
Roche
University
of
New
England
EDU-702
Fall
2015-A2
Dr.
Steven
Klein
December
16,
2015
COMPENDIUM NOTEBOOK
p. 3
p. 5
p. 8
p. 9
p. 10
p. 12
p. 16
p. 18
L. Roche, p. 2
COMPENDIUM NOTEBOOK
L. Roche, p. 3
Maine educational statutes are based on the Constitution of The State of Maine, which includes two
sections
regarding
education
in
the
First
Part
of
Article
VIII.
The
first
section
states
that
legislature
requires
towns
to
provide
a
public
school
opportunity
for
its
residents
at
their
own
expense,
and
explains
that
legislature
may
be
involved
in
the
endowment
of
academies,
universities,
and
seminaries.
The
second
section
addresses
authorization
by
the
legislature
for
student
loans
to
be
granted
to
Maine
students
seeking
higher
education.
Of Maines Statutes, Title 20 and Title 20-A respond specifically to education. Title 20 is divided into six
main
categories
(or
Parts)
of
educational
statutes,
which
contain
a
number
of
different
chapters
housing
specific
and
relevant
statutes.
The
categories
are:
Administration
and
Organization;
Public
Schools;
Teachers;
Advanced
and
Special
Education;
Education
and
Rehabilitation
of
Disabled,
Handicapped,
Gifted
and
Talented
Persons;
and
Financing
and
School
Property.
Title
20-A
is
divided
in
the
same
manner,
but
into
ten
main
categories:
General
Provisions;
School
Organization;
Elementary
and
Secondary
Education;
Specific
Education
Programs;
Post-
Secondary
Education;
Teachers;
School
Finance;
Rehabilitation
Services;
Learning
Technology;
and
Interstate
Compact
on
Educational
Opportunity
for
Military
Children.
2.
The
Maine
State
Board
of
Education
The nine members of the Maine State Board of Education are appointed by the Governor. When they are
appointed,
four
must
live
in
the
First
Congressional
District,
four
must
live
in
the
Second
Congressional
District,
and
one
can
live
in
either
Congressional
District.
The
five-year
terms
that
each
board
member
serves
are
staggered.
The
board
is
responsible
for
electing
the
head
of
the
board
the
Chair
as
well
as
a
Vice
Chair
every
year.
Also
on
the
board,
but
without
voting
privileges,
two
student
members
appointed
by
the
Governor.
These
students
will
serve
two-year
terms,
starting
their
first
term
when
they
are
a
high
school
junior.
One
student
must
live
in
the
First
Congressional
District,
and
the
other
must
live
in
the
Second
Congressional
District.
The
members
of
the
State
Board
of
Education
also
serve
on
outside
boards,
commissions,
and
other
bodies
within
education.
The
State
Board
of
Education
also
has
four
standing
committees
responsible
for
conducting
various
aspects
of
the
Boards
business.
Members
of
the
board
are
appointed
to
each
committee
by
the
Board
Chair.
3.
Maine
State
Court
System
The Maine Court System is responsible for protecting citizen rights and upholding citizen responsibilities
according
to
law.
The
courts
that
make
up
the
system
resolve
civil
and
criminal
complaints
and
disputes,
and
are
also
responsible
for
providing
official
approval
of
matters
that
are
not
in
dispute,
such
as
adoptions
and
name
changes.
Lesser
criminal
offenses,
civil
actions,
and
family
law
matters
are
likely
to
be
tried
without
a
jury
in
one
of
Maines
District
Courts
with
one
of
36
judges.
Small
claims
court
is
a
session
of
the
District
Court,
which
involves
informal
proceedings,
often
without
attorneys,
in
matters
that
involve
less
than
$6,000.
Defendants
in
District
COMPENDIUM NOTEBOOK
L. Roche, p. 4
Court
hearings
wishing
for
a
jury
trial
may
appeal
to
the
Superior
Court.
Appeals
in
District
Court
Decisions
may
also
be
made
directly
to
the
Supreme
Judicial
Court,
except
for
small
claims,
forcible
entry,
and
detainer
cases.
Maine Superior Courts are the only courts that use juries and hear almost all civil and criminal matters
(except
for
family
matters,
juvenile
cases,
and
civil
violations).
There
is
one
Superior
Court
in
each
of
Maines
16
counties,
and
court
is
held
by
one
of
17
justices.
Any
appeal
of
a
Superior
Court
decision
may
be
taken
to
the
Supreme
Judicial
Court,
which
is
located
in
Portland.
The
court
has
seven
justices
and
one
Chief
Justice,
who
is
the
head
of
the
judicial
branch.
Decisions
made
by
the
Supreme
Judicial
Court
justices
are
final.
4.
U.S.
Circuit
Court
of
Appeals
for
the
First
Circuit
th
Since March 30 , 1820, Maine has been included in the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit,
along
with
four
other
districts:
Massachusetts,
New
Hampshire,
Puerto
Rico,
and
Rhode
Island.
The
Court
is
located
in
Boston,
Massachusetts
and
hears
appeals
from
the
five
districts.
Maine
has
had
three
authorized
judgeships
in
the
Court
since
1990.
5.
Any
major
state
court
cases
or
cases
settled
within
the
First
Circuit
Court
that
contested
federal,
state,
or
local
control
of
education.
I searched for such cases on four different occasions, certainly over an hour in length, but I was
determined
to
find
something
to
fit
the
criteria.
The
most
promising
compilations
of
education-related
Circuit
Court
cases
came
from
Wrightslaw.com,
which
included
cases
from
other
courts
as
well.
The
site
contains
important
cases
regarding
Special
Education,
an
area
in
education
I
believe
is
prone
to
legal
involvement;
thus,
I
felt
I
would
be
successful
here.
However,
the
site
is
not
specific
to
one
Court
of
Appeals
and
it
is
necessary
to
click
on
each
individual
case
to
determine
which
state
it
is
specific,
too.
Unfortunately,
I
did
not
find
a
Maine
case
in
the
Courts
of
Appeals
section.
I also found a promising site, JustiaLaw, which seems to be a go-to site for everything law: information
about
every
legal
practice
area,
court
system,
law,
lawyer
and
practice,
etc.
I
navigated
to
First
Circuit
U.S.
Court
of
Appeals
Case
Law
where
I
could
browse
opinions
on
cases
from
the
Court
from
as
far
back
as
1917.
While
I
had
the
same
issues
as
I
did
with
the
Wrightslaw.com
site
(I
couldnt
easily
distinguish
cases
from
Maine),
this
site
contained
non-education-related
cases,
as
well,
which
made
the
search
much
more
difficult.
Using
keywords
to
search,
such
as
Maine,
school,
and
education,
I
came
across
cases
from
the
First
Circuit,
but
none
for
Maine.
I
shared
a
few
of
these
cases
in
EDU
702s
Starbucks,
hoping
others
might
be
able
to
use
them
in
their
compendium.
COMPENDIUM NOTEBOOK
L. Roche, p. 5
Corporal Punishment - Maines statutes around corporal punishment can be found within the civil and
criminal
statutes
that
Maine.gov
has
compiled
under
Abuse
and
Neglect
of
Children,
with
other
laws
intended
to
protect
children
from
the
mistreatment
of
adults.
According
to
Title
17-A,
sec.
106(2),
school
personnel
are
not
permitted
to
use
corporal
punishment.
Seclusion & Restraint Rule Chapter 33 governs physical restraint and seclusion (accessible through the
DOE
website
as
a
word
document).
Maines
DOE
has
a
compilation
of
resources
around
restraints
and
seclusions
including
training,
the
amended
law
that
was
put
in
effect
in
April
of
2013,
incident
report
forms,
and
resources
and
materials
about
the
topics.
There
is
some
useful
RTF
files
accessible
here
including:
Rule
Chapter
33
Timelines/Requirements
that
provides
the
guidelines
to
how
many
people
need
to
be
present
in
both
scenarios
and
what
their
roles
are.
Non-Regulatory
Guidance,
which
is
a
document
designed
by
the
DOE
to
help
schools,
parents,
students,
and
the
public,
understand
the
limitations
and
requirements
related
to
the
use
of
restraints
and
seclusions
as
they
are
defined
by
the
state.
This
file
also
provides
clarification
types
of
intervention
that
are/not
considered
to
be
physical
restraint
and
seclusion
under
Rule
Chapter
33,
and
actions
that
are
prohibited
under
the
rule.
Key
terms
from
the
Rule
are
also
defined:
Incident,
risk
of
injury
or
harm,
physical
escort,
physical
restraint,
seclusion,
serious
bodily
injury,
and
timeout.
2.
Maine
Statutes
Relating
to
Concussions
The Maine DOE has a site specific to concussion management with resources for families and students,
coaches
and
athletic
administrators,
teachers
and
administrators,
and
healthcare
professionals.
The Maine DOE has created a Concussion Model Policy for school districts to reference as they create
their
own
policies
and
procedures
around
concussion
prevention
and
management.
Most
importantly,
the
policy
includes
segments
on
training
of
school
staff,
expectations
of
students
and
parents,
and
the
management
of
the
concussion
and
other
head
injuries.
In May, 2012, Governor Paul LePage approved an act (An Act to Direct the Commissioner of Education To
Adopt
a
Model
Policy
Regarding
Management
of
Head
Injuries
in
School
Activities
and
Athletics)
requiring
school
administrative
units
to
have
a
concussion
policy
and
protocols
for
managing
reported
concussive
head
injuries
in
the
school
setting.
There
is
also
an
expectation
within
this
act
recommending
that
school
staff
be
made
aware
of
the
laws
requirements
and
the
recommended
policy
for
all
schools.
COMPENDIUM NOTEBOOK
L. Roche, p. 6
General information about Maine state bullying laws and policies can be found at stopbullying.gov.
In
May
of
2012,
Governor
Paul
LePage
passed
a
law,
PL
659
An
Act
to
Prohibit
Bullying
and
Cyberbullying
in
Schools,
making
it
mandatory
for
school
staff
to
be
made
aware
of
the
requirements
and
recommended
procedures
for
handling
bullying
and
cyber-bullying
in
schools
per
state
law
(Title
20-A,
6554).
Maine
laws
covering
bullying
include:
Title 20-A, 254, which details the educational duties of the commissioner, including:
254.11
-
the
development
of
statewide
standards
for
responsible
and
ethical
student
behavior.
The
standards
developed
with
input
from
educators,
administrators,
parents,
students
and
community
members
must
require
annual
reporting
of
incidents
of
violent
and
harmful
behavior
by
or
against
students
to
the
department
by
school
administrative
units.
It
is
also
expected
that
the
department
will
provide
forms
for
reporting;
and
254.11A
-
the
commissioner
will
develop
a
model
policy
to
address
bullying
and
cyber-bullying
for
schools
to
use
pursuant
to
section
6554.
It
is
expected
that
a
copy
of
the
model
policy
is
provided
to
each
school
in
the
state
and
posted
on
the
publicly
accessible
portion
of
the
department's
website.
The
commissioner
will
also
create
a
procedure
for
schools
to
report
substantiated
incidents
of
bullying
and
cyber-bullying
to
the
department
and
update
or
revise
the
model
policy
with
revisions
being
distributed
to
schools
and
posted
on
the
website.
Title 20-A, 1001, which details the duties of school boards, including:
1001.15
which
explains
that
school
boards
must
adopt
a
student
code
of
conduct
with
input
from
educators,
administrators,
parents,
students
and
community
members.
The
student
code
of
conduct
should
be
consistent
with
the
statewide
standards
for
student
behavior
developed
under
254.11;
and
1001.15A
which
states
that
school
boards
must
consider
district-wide
disciplinary
policies
when
revising
consequences
for
any
violation
of
the
student
code
of
conduct
pursuant
of
1001.15(C).
School
boards
must
consider
policies
that
(a)
focus
on
positive
interventions
and
expectations
and
avoid
focusing
exclusively
on
unacceptable
student
behavior
and
(b)
focus
on
positive
and
restorative
interventions
that
are
consistent
with
evidence-based
practices
rather
than
set
punishments
for
specific
behavior
and
avoid
so-called
zero-tolerance
practices
unless
specifically
required
by
federal
or
state
laws,
rules
or
regulations.
Title
20-A,
6553,
which
prohibits
the
act
of
hazing
and
requires
school
boards
to
incorporate
such
expectations
within
their
policies,
make
known
the
penalties
for
violating
the
law,
and
distribute
copies
of
the
adopted
policies
and
penalties
to
all
students
within
the
district.
The
law
also
gives
responsibility
for
administering
the
policy
to
the
superintendent.
COMPENDIUM NOTEBOOK
L. Roche, p. 7
Title
20-A,
6554,
which
prohibits
bullying
behavior
in
schools.
The
law
clearly
states
that
All
students
have
the
right
to
attend
public
schools
that
are
safe,
secure
and
peaceful
environments,
and
the
Legislature
identifies
bullying
and
cyber-bulling
as
negatively
impacting
the
school
environment
and
student
learning
and
well-being.
The
law
defines
bullying,
cyber-bullying,
retaliation,
and
school
grounds.
The
law
also
identifies
the
appropriate
process
of
adopting
a
policy,
distribution
of
the
policy,
and
application
of
the
policy,
as
well
as
the
superintendents
role
in
the
above.
The
Maine
DOE
has
provided
a
state
model
policy
for
school
boards
to
refer
to
when
developing
their
policy.
The
model
policy
identifies
what
behaviors
are
prohibited,
definitions
for
bullying
and
cyber-
bullying,
who
the
policy
applies
to
and
how
it
is
applied,
who
can
report
behavior
that
is
in
violation
of
the
policy
and
how
to
report
it,
how
schools
will
respond
to
the
behavior
or
reports
of
the
behavior,
and
what
the
school
board
and
superintendents
roles
are.
4.
Comparative
or
Contributory
Negligence
as
a
Defense
in
Maine?
Immunity
Safeguards
for
School
Personnel
in
Maine?
Maine uses a modified comparative negligence system, as outlined in Title 14, 156. This means that each
party
is
held
responsible
for
damages
in
proportion
to
their
own
percentage
of
fault,
which
is
determined
by
a
judge
or
jury
and
what
it
thought
to
be
just
and
equitable
considering
the
plaintiffs
own
actions.
If
a
plaintiffs
negligence
reaches
a
certain
percentage
(in
Maine,
the
percentage
bar
is
50%),
the
plaintiff
cannot
recover
any
damages.
Damages
attributed
to
the
defendant
will
be
reduced
by
the
plaintiffs
negligence.
Title 20-A, 4009 on Civil Liberty states that when it comes to reasonable force, teachers may not be held
civilly
liable
if
they
are
controlling
disturbing
behavior
or
removing
a
person
from
the
scene
of
a
disturbance.
They
may,
however,
be
liable
if
there
is
intentional
or
reckless
use
of
force
creating
a
substantial
risk
of
death,
serious
bodily
injury,
or
extraordinary
pain.
Again,
unless
a
teacher
is
reckless
or
there
is
gross
negligence,
a
teacher
may
not
be
liable
for
a
students
injuries
as
a
result
of
receiving
emergency
by
the
teacher.
5.
Other
Items
In 2014, a former Brunswick Junior High School student, who claimed he was physically and sexually
assaulted
and
discriminated
against
based
on
his
sex
and
sexual
orientation,
filed
a
lawsuit
in
federal
court
claiming
his
civil
rights
were
violated.
The
Maine
Human
Rights
Commission,
which
in
June
2014
voted
to
uphold
its
investigators
report
substantiating
the
complaints,
joined
the
suit
as
a
plaintiff
to
ensure
that
Brunswick
has
in
place
effective
measures
to
prevent
a
hostile
education
environment
based
on
sex
and
sexual
orientation,
according
to
court
documents.
The
Commissions
plan
to
join
suit
appears
to
a
precedent-setting
move.
The
suit
named
the
Brunswick
School
Department,
town
of
Brunswick
and
Brunswick
Junior
High
School
Principal
Walter
Wallace
as
defendants.
As
of
July
2015,
settlement
discussions
that
began
in
January
of
2015
had
not
been
successful.
COMPENDIUM
NOTEBOOK
PART
III
CHURCH
&
STATE
L. Roche, p. 8
1.
State
laws
that
relate
to
a
moment
of
prayer
OR
meditation
on
the
books
or
any
other
statute
that
addresses
religion
on
the
schools.
Maine law, Title 20-A, 4805.2, allows for a period of silence may be observed at the beginning of the first
class
of
each
day
in
all
grades
and
in
all
public
schools.
The
law
states
that
the
teacher
in
the
class
will
announce
the
period
of
silence
will
be
observed
for
reflection
or
meditation
and
that
no
activities
should
occur
during
that
time.
2.
State
law
relating
to
tax
vouchers
being
used
at
any
school
including
religious
schools.
Any student who does not live in a district that does not operate any public schools, or does not contract
with
schools
of
another
district,
is
eligible
for
a
voucher
that
is
equal
to
the
statewide
average
per-pupil
allocation.
These
standards
are
defined
by
Title
20-A,
Chapter
117,
Subchapter
2:
Approval
for
the
receipt
of
public
funds
by
private
schools
2951
-
2955).
3.
Does
Maine
have
a
Blaine
Amendment?
The Blaine Amendments are provisions in state constitutions that restrict the use of public funds to
support
private
religious
schools.
Maine
does
not
have
any
Blaine
Amendments
within
its
constitution,
which
means
there
are
no
prohibitions
on
public
funding
of
parental
choice
programs.
This
makes
available
tax
credits
and
voucher
programs
as
school
choice
are
available
providing
tax
credit
and
voucher
programs
as
school
choice
options
for
Maine.
4.
Any
state
court
cases
or
cases
settled
within
the
First
Circuit
Court
that
contested
church/state
issues?
In Anderson et al. v. Town of Durham et al. (2006), the Maine Supreme Court upheld a Cumberland
County
Superior
Court
ruling
in
favor
of
the
State
of
Maine
and
parents
opposed
to
public
funding
of
religious
education.
The
court
decision
stated
that
excessive
entanglement
between
religion
and
state
would
occur
if
funding
for
a
religious
school
were
allowed.
The
court
also
stated
that
allowing
such
funding
would
raise
concerns
about
maintaining
diversity
within
the
public
schools,
and
avoiding
involvement
in
discrimination
in
admissions
and
hiring
by
religious
schools.
5.
Other
items
that
were
found.
Title 20, 1224 allows for students to be released for up to one hour per week for moral instruction or
COMPENDIUM NOTEBOOK
L. Roche, p. 9
Title 20-A Chapter 606-B is the Maine statute known as the Essential Programs and Services Funding Act.
The
model
is
cost
driving,
not
expenditure
driven,
providing
a
basis
for
adequacy
and
greater
equity
in
school
funding.
The
EPS
has
been
established
to
insure
that
all
Maine
schools
have
the
fundamental
programs
and
resources
for
all
students
to
have
an
equitable
opportunity
to
meet
the
standards
of
the
8
content
standard
subject
areas.
2.
State
statutes
that
provide
guidelines
for
working
with
ESL
children,
illegal
immigrants,
homeless
children,
gender
or
any
other
designated
group
(not
including
children
with
disabilitiesthis
will
be
covered
in
Module
5)
Title 20-A, 4701 states that Maine schools may provide instruction in a language other than English if a
school
is
building
proficiency
in
both
English
and
a
second
language
or
if
transitional
instruction
using
bilingual
techniques
with
students
of
limited
English
proficiency
is
necessary.
In
the
event
that
it
is
the
latter,
Exception
2
of
the
statute
requires
Maine
school
districts
to
1)
Create
a
Lau
Plan
(from
Lau
v.
Nichols,
414
U.S.
563
(1974),
the
U.S.
Supreme
Court
stated
that
school
systems
must
take
action
to
see
that
limited
English
proficient
national
origin
minority
students
are
able
to
benefit
from
an
education
instructed
in
English),
which
will
include
the
legal
foundation
for
service,
student
assessments,
an
instructional
plan,
parental
involvement,
qualified
personnel,
a
coordination
plan,
a
budget,
adjunct
services,
and
other
possible
considerations;
2)
3)
Develop
and
provide
a
program
of
services
to
meet
the
academic
and
English
language
proficiency
needs
to
the
English
Learner;
4)
5)
The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits Maine (and all states) from denying a free public education to
undocumented
immigrant
children
regardless
of
their
immigrant
status,
as
ruled
by
the
Supreme
Court
in
Plyler
v.
Doe
(1981).
As
such,
illegal
immigrants
would
be
entitled
to
the
aforementioned
guidelines
for
education
to
English
Learners
under
Title
20-A,
4701.
Maine schools are required to follow the provisions entitled to homeless students under the federal
McKinney-Vento
Homeless
Assistance
Act.
The
purpose
of
the
act
is
to
minimize
the
disruptions
to
a
youths
access
to
education
as
a
result
of
being
homeless
by
guaranteeing
the
student
the
right
to
a
free,
appropriate,
public
education
where
said
student
has
been
attending,
regardless
of
whether
or
not
residency
requirements
are
being
COMPENDIUM NOTEBOOK
L. Roche, p. 10
met,
or
whether
the
typical
documents
and
immunizations
for
enrollment
can
be
provided.
Homeless
students
are
also
guaranteed
the
transportation
they
need
to
attend
school
under
McKinney-Vento.
Maines anti-discrimination laws within Title 5, 4602 protect students from discrimination based on sex,
physical
or
mental
disability,
national
origin
or
race,
and
sexual
orientation
in
any
academic,
extracurricular,
athletic,
research,
occupational
training
or
other
program
or
activity.
It
also
protects
students
during
the
admissions
process
and
in
obtaining
financial
aid.
3.
State
court
cases
or
cases
settled
within
your
Circuit
Court
that
have
involved
desegregation
issues
or
other
student
classification
issues?
I was not able to come across a case regarding desegregation issues or other student classification issues
in
Maine.
Many
searches
left
me
with
the
requirement
to
log
in
to
view
case
summaries
if
they
were
not
cases
that
were
being
references
by
sources
other
than
court
filing
databases.
This
was
very
frustrating!
4.
Does
your
state
protect
for
sexual
orientation?
Title 5, 4602.4 states that, on the basis of sexual orientation, it is discriminatory and unlawful for a
student
to
be
denied
the
opportunity
to
participate
in,
or
the
benefits
of,
any
academic,
extracurricular,
research,
occupational
training
or
other
program
or
activity,
including
equal
opportunity
of
participation
in
athletic
programs
based
on
sexual
orientation.
The
Act
also
states
that
it
is
unlawful
education
discrimination
to
deny
any
person
admission
to
an
institution
or
program
or
fail
to
provide
equal
access
to
information
about
an
institution
or
program,
or
to
deny
financial
assistance
availability
and
opportunity
when
it
is
based
on
a
persons
sexual
orientation.
The
protections
within
this
act
do
not
apply
to
any
educational
facility
owned,
controlled,
or
operated
by
a
bona
fide
religious
corporation,
association,
or
society.
PART
V
CHILDREN
WITH
EXCEPTIONALITIES
1.
State
statutes
that
provide
guidelines
for
working
with
children
of
exceptionality
including
all
disabilities
as
identified
in
state
law
and
gifted
and
talented,
if
addressed.
Maine must have policies, procedures, and effective implementation of practices that are aligned with
and
support
the
implementation
of
the
federal
law,
IDEA
(Individuals
with
Disabilities
Education
Act).
IDEA
was
put
in
place
to
ensure
that
children
with
disabilities
are
identified
for
timely
evaluation,
and
if
it
is
determined
that
they
are
eligible,
they
are
provided
with
appropriate
services
in
the
lease
restrictive
environment.
Part
4
of
Maine
Statute
20-A
pertains
to
Special
Education
Programs
and
contains
laws
consistent
with
IDEA
regulations.
Within
Part
4
are
special
education
program
general
provisions
(Chapter
301:
7001-7007),
as
well
as
protections
required
for
children
with
disabilities
(Chapter
303:
7201-7302)
and
through
the
Maine
Educational
Center
for
the
Deaf
and
COMPENDIUM NOTEBOOK
L. Roche, p. 11
Hard
of
Hearing
and
the
Governor
Baxter
School
for
the
Deaf
(Chapter
304:
7401-7412),
rules
around
such
programming
in
private
and
public
schools
(Chapter
305:
7501-7504),
and
statutes
relevant
to
gifted
and
talented
programs
(Chapter
311:
8101-8105).
The discipline of students with disabilities must be consistent with the federal requirements of Section
1415(k)
of
IDEA.
Title
20-A,
1001.9-B
states
that
school
boards
have
the
right
to
sanction
a
child
with
a
disability
for
misconduct
that
violates
school
rules.
A
suspension
may
be
instituted
for
up
to
10
days,
individually
or
cumulatively,
and
if
the
suspension
is
less
than
10
days,
there
is
no
requirement
to
provide
a
tutor,
transportation
or
any
other
aspect
of
the
student's
special
education
program.
1001.9-D
of
Title
20-A
states
that
parents
are
not
required
to
pay
for
professional
services
determined
by
the
superintendent
to
be
necessary
to
establish
a
students
readiness
to
return
to
school
from
an
expulsion
if
the
student
has
a
disability,
or
if
the
school
did
not
have
knowledge
that
the
student
had
a
disability
prior
to
enforcing
disciplinary
measures.
2.
Any
state
court
cases
or
cases
settled
within
your
Circuit
Court
that
impact
the
structure
of
special
education
and
its
delivery
in
your
state
(there
could
be
a
plethora
of
cases
so
focus
only
on
those
that
seem
to
have
a
big
impact)
School Union No. 37 v. United National Insurance Company (2010) held in the District Court of Maine, in
Bangor,
demonstrates
how
insurance
coverage
and
diligence
can
impact
a
districts
special
education
expenditure.
A
Maine
school
district
won
over
$73,000
from
its
insurance
carrier
for
attorneys
fees
incurred
defending
against
an
Individuals
with
Disabilities
Education
Act
(IDEA)
due
process
case.
Parents
who
were
seeking
to
be
reimbursed
for
the
expenses
accrued
by
their
sons
private
school
brought
the
case
to
the
First
Appeals
Court
where
it
was
concluded
that
the
IDEA
remedy
of
reimbursement
was
within
the
insurance
policys
ambiguous
reference
to
monetary
damages,
and
therefore
was
covered.
IDEA
remedies
do
not
include
awards
of
monetary
damages,
but
the
court,
relying
on
U.S.
Supreme
Court
precedent,
observed
that
reimbursement
to
parents
is
the
belated
payment
of
expenses
the
district
would
have
borne
had
it
provided
a
free
appropriate
public
education
(FAPE)
to
the
student.
The
policy
permitted
other
types
of
reimbursements
and
did
not
expressly
exclude
IDEA
claims.
3.
HOUSSE
standards
for
special
education
teachers
Special education teachers teaching multiple subjects must demonstrate competence in all the core
academic
subjects
in
which
the
teacher
teaches
in
the
same
manner
as
is
required
for
an
elementary,
middle,
or
secondary
school
teacher
who
is
not
new
to
the
profession,
which
may
be
assessed
by
a
single,
High
Objective
Uniform
State
Standard
(HOUSSE)
evaluation.
Maines
HOUSSE
rubrics
are
divided
into
three
parts,
one
each
for
elementary,
middle
school,
and
high
school
specialists.
Each
part
evaluates
and
gathers
details
regarding
a
teachers:
college
level
coursework
in
the
content
area
and
content
assessments;
professional
development
COMPENDIUM NOTEBOOK
L. Roche, p. 12
activities
related
to
the
content;
service
to
the
content
area;
and
presentations,
and
awards,
recognition,
and
scholarship
in
the
content
area.
PART
VI
STUDENTS
RIGHTS
1.
Students
rights
involving
school
attendance
(compulsory
age
mandates),
online
K-12
education,
oversight
of
home
schooling,
charter
schools,
user
fees,
confidentiality
of
HIV,
health
concerns
with
attendance
(e.g.,
vaccinations
needed),
student
records,
school
curriculum
requirements
(testing,
for
instance),
etc.
Maine law requires students who are 7 years old or older and under 17 years old to attend a public day
school
during
the
time
it
is
in
session.
This
is
noted
in
Title
20-A,
5001-A
on
compulsory
attendance.
In
this
same
section,
exemptions
to
school
attendance
are
outlined,
as
well
as
what
constitutes
an
excusable
absence,
and
what
adult
responsibilities
are
around
student
attendance.
If
a
student
has
completed
the
sixth
grade
and
has
the
equivalent
of
ten
full
days
of
unexcused
absences,
or
seven
consecutive
school
days
of
unexcused
absences
during
the
school
year,
the
student
it
considered
truant.
A
truant
student
is
also
one
who
is
at
least
seven
years
old,
has
not
completed
the
sixth
grade
and
has
the
equivalent
of
seven
full
days
of
unexcused
absences
or
five
consecutive
days
of
unexcused
absences
during
a
school
year.
If
a
student
is
determined
to
be
truant,
procedures
to
be
followed
by
the
school
are
outlined
in
Title
20-A,
5051-A,
including
written
notices,
referrals,
and
reports.
Parents
have
a
civil
duty
to
send
their
children
to
school.
If
a
parent
has
control
of
a
student
who
is
truant,
that
parent
is
primarily
responsible
for
the
truancy
and
is
subject
to
a
fine
for
committing
a
civil
violation.
Acceptable alternatives to attending public day school are provided within paragraph (3). Home
instruction
is
allowable
so
long
as
it
complies
with
subparagraph
(4)
that
requires
a
written
notice
of
intent
to
home
school
by
the
parent(s),
a
notice
of
intention
each
year
if
the
program
will
continue
in
combination
with
one
form
of
annual
assessment
of
the
student's
academic
progress
(there
are
four
options
provided),
and
the
intent
to
reenroll
the
student
in
day
school
if
the
home
schooling
program
ceases.
Online
educational
programs
are
also
means
to
an
education
sought
out
by
many
Maine
students.
In
order
for
an
online
program
to
be
an
appropriate
alternative,
it
must
have
gained
the
approval
of
the
school
department
in
consultation
of
the
state
board,
and
met
the
requirements
outlined
in
19153
of
Title
20-A.
Chapter 12 of Title 20-A provides the statutes on Public Charter Schools in Maine. The operation of
charter
schools
is
outlined
in
section
2412
of
Title
20-A
and
states
that
public
charter
schools
are
subject
to
all
federal
laws
and
authorities,
as
well
as
local
laws
and
the
charter
contract.
Funding
for
charter
schools
is
detailed
in
section
2413
and
section
2413-A
of
Title
20-A,
stressing
the
requirement
of
an
exact
student
count
at
each
charter
school
so
that
state
allocated
funds
per
student
are
granted
to
the
appropriate
school.
Also
provided
within
the
chapter
are
statutes
regarding
charter
school
proposals,
applications,
contracts,
oversight,
and
roles.
COMPENDIUM
NOTEBOOK
L. Roche, p. 13
Subchapter 1 of Chapter 221 within Title 20-A provides Maines statutes on student records including the
dissemination
of
information,
parental
access
to
information,
and
student
attendance
records.
When
students
transfer
from
one
school
to
another,
their
educational
records
must
follow.
The
transfer
of
educational
records
is
regulated
by
6001-B,
of
Title
20-A,
and
will
be
passed
from
school
unit
to
another
when
the
superintendent
of
the
receiving
school
has
made
a
written
request
to
the
sending
school.
The
exception
to
this
is
in
regards
to
confidential
health
records
which
includes
those
concerning
a
students
HIV
infection
status
and
test
results,
alcohol
and
other
drug
abuse
treatment,
health
care
and
treatment,
and/or
mental
health
treatment.
These
records
will
only
be
transferred
when
the
superintendent
of
the
sending
school
receives
the
authorization
or
consent
necessary
for
the
dissemination
such
records.
Per Title 20-A, 6355, a students enrollment and attendance in a school may not be permitted without a
certification
of
immunization
or
immunity
against
each
disease
(as
directed
under
6354)
unless
there
is
written
assurance
that
the
immunization
ill
be
completed
within
90
days,
a
medical
exemption
based
on
a
notice
that
a
physician
finds
the
vaccination
medically
inadvisable,
or
if
there
is
a
sincere
philosophical
or
religious
exemption
provided
in
writing
by
the
students
parent(s)
or
guardian(s).
Statutes in Maine regarding school curriculum are organized within Chapter 207-A of Title 20-A.
Elementary
and
junior
high
schools
or
middle
school
courses
of
study
are
within
Subchapter
2,
which
state
that
the
basic
courses
of
study
must
provide
a
foundation
for
students
in
English
language
arts,
health
education
and
physical
education,
mathematics,
science
and
technology,
social
studies,
visual
and
performing
arts,
and
world
languages.
Secondary
school
curriculum
regulations
are
within
Subchapter
3.
Essentially,
a
high
school
must
provide
a
comprehensive
program
of
instruction
for
at
least
two
years,
and
provide
a
structure
so
that
students
have
the
opportunity
to
achieve
the
parameters
of
essential
instruction
and
graduation
requirements
(4721).
Current
standards
that
must
be
met
by
students
in
order
to
receive
a
diploma
are
laid
out
in
4722
and
are
st
effective
until
July
1 ,
2020.
All
students
must
satisfactorily
complete
four
years
of
English,
two
years
of
social
studies
and
history
(including
American
history,
government,
civics
and
personal
finance),
two
years
of
math,
two
years
of
science
(including
at
least
one
year
with
a
laboratory
component),
and
one
year
of
fine
arts
(which
may
include
art,
music,
forensics,
or
drama).
In
all
cases,
the
curriculum
must
be
within
the
parameters
for
essential
instruction
and
graduation
requirements
as
required
by
6209,
which
states
that
the
state
board
must
implement
a
comprehensive,
statewide
system
of
learning
results.
Maine
Learning
Results
for
each
of
the
eight
content
areas
are
available
for
viewing
from
the
Maine
Department
of
Education
site.
2.
Any
state
statutes
relating
to
students
rights
involving
free
speech
(including
a
schools
ability
to
censor),
confidentiality
of
records,
dress
code
Maine does not have a specific law referencing the freedom of speech given to students; however, as was
determined
in
Tinker
v.
Des
Moines
Independent
Community
School
District
(1968),
students
do
not
leave
their
constitutional
rights
to
freedom
of
speech
or
expression
when
they
enter
school,
and
thus,
are
protected
by
the
COMPENDIUM NOTEBOOK
L. Roche, p. 14
First
Amendment
of
the
U.S.
Constitution
to
Freedom
of
Speech.
The
Supreme
Court
indicated
in
the
Tinker
case
that
courts
should
balance
speech
with
the
authority
of
the
school,
by
applying
the
Tinker
Test.
The
first
two
questions
test
whether
the
conduct
can
be
identified
as
speech.
If
either
of
the
first
two
questions
is
answered
yes,
then
four
additional
questions
must
be
asked.
If
any
of
the
remaining
questions
are
answered
yes,
the
students
expression
could
be
limited.
Tinker Test
It is federal and state laws that govern the dissemination of education records and personally identifiable
information
about
students
in
public
schools,
private
schools
approved
by
the
department,
or
receiving
a
home-
school
education.
The
United
States
Family
Educational
Rights
and
Privacy
Act
of
1974
(FERPA)
protects
the
privacy
of
student
education
records
and
applies
to
all
schools
that
receive
federal
funding.
Through
FERPA,
parents
have
certain
rights
to
their
childs
education
records
until
their
child
turns
18
or
attends
a
school
beyond
the
high
school
level.
In
addition
to
FERPA,
Individuals
with
Disabilities
Education
Act
(IDEA)
regulations
provide
additional
protections
tailored
to
special
confidentiality
concerns
for
children
with
disabilities
and
their
families.
Public
agencies
must
inform
parents
of
children
with
disabilities
when
information
is
no
longer
needed
and,
except
for
certain
permanent
record
information,
that
information
must
be
destroyed
at
the
request
of
the
parents.
FERPA
and
IDEA
Confidentiality
Provisions
can
be
referenced
from
the
U.S.
Department
of
Education.
School boards have the duty of as stated in Title 20-A, 1001.15 to adopt a student code of conduct,
identifying
what
an
acceptable
student
behavior
is
and
what
the
process
for
disciplining
a
violation
of
that
code
would
be.
Student
behavior,
including
student
dress,
is
measured
against
such
codes
of
conduct.
Schools
must
be
mindful
of
students
constitutional
rights
when
addressing
a
dress
code
violation.
Freedom
of
expression
includes
student
appearance,
involving
hair
and
dress,
and
warrants
the
use
of
the
Tinker
Test
so
long
as
students
are
alleging
that
their
right
to
free
speech
is
being
violated.
If
this
is
not
the
case,
Courts
will
looks
for
reasonableness
of
the
schools
grooming
policy
related
to
safety
and
order.
3.
Discipline,
research
your
states
statute
relating
to
suspension,
expulsion
and
any
other
disciplinary
measure
(like
truancy
or
search
and
seizure,
zero
tolerance)
Title 20-A, 1001.15-A provides guidelines for schools when disciplining students in violation of the
student code of conduct. Positive and restorative interventions are encouraged to teach students prosocial
COMPENDIUM NOTEBOOK
L. Roche, p. 15
alternatives
to
their
behavior(s).
Unless
federal
or
state
laws,
rules
or
regulations
require
zero-tolerance
practices,
schools
are
requested
to
avoid
such
practices.
If, however, a students behavior is in excessive violation of school conduct and the school is looking to
expel,
following
a
proper
investigation
of
the
students
behavior,
a
process
must
be
followed
with
due
process
provisions
outlined
in
1001.8-A.
Before
an
expulsion
hearing,
a
written
notice
must
be
sent
to
the
parents
notifying
them
of
the
date,
time,
and
location
of
the
hearing;
a
description
of
the
incident(s)
that
led
to
the
hearing;
their
right
to
review
school
records
prior
to
the
hearing;
a
description
of
the
hearing
process;
and
an
explanation
of
the
consequences
of
an
expulsion.
At
the
hearing,
the
student
may
present
and
cross-examine
witnesses
(all
of
whom
must
be
sworn
in
by
the
chair
of
the
hearing)
and
bring
a
legal
representative.
If
a
student
is
expelled
or
suspended,
per
1001.9,
it
may
be
a
result
of:
disobedient
or
deliberately
disorderly
conduct;
infractions
of
violence;
the
possession
of
a
firearm
or
dangerous
weapon
on
school
property;
of
the
possession,
furnishing,
or
trafficking
of
illegal
drugs.
If
it
is
determined
at
the
hearing
that
the
behavior
is
not
likely
to
recur,
the
student
may
be
return
to
school
following
suspension.
If
a
student
is
expelled,
the
school
board
can
extend
that
expulsion
through
the
current
school
year,
or
for
a
specified
period
of
time
with
a
reentry
plan
that
specified
conditions
of
re-admittance.
Article 1, Section 5 of the Maine Constitution protects students from unreasonable searches and seizures;
however,
it
is
acceptable
practice
for
schools
to
conduct
searches
if
there
is
reasonable
suspicion
as
was
decided
in
New
Jersey
v.
T.L.O.
(1985).
4.
Any
state
court
cases
or
cases
settled
within
your
Circuit
Court
that
involved
student
rights
such
as
freedom
of
speech,
dress,
discipline
including
search
and
seizure?
Doran v. Contoocook Valley School District (2009) claimed that a dog sniffing lockers, backpacks and
around
the
New
Hampshire
school
falls
under
the
doctrine
of
public
smells
and
is
not
considered
an
unreasonable
search
when
a
mother
claimed
her
son
was
wrongly
searched
and
it
was
done
in
violation
of
his
Fourth
Amendment
rights.
The
mother
lost
the
case.
Had
the
dog
sniffed
the
student,
the
act
would
have
been
considered
a
search
without
reasonable
suspicion.
5.
Other
items
that
were
found
Article I of the Maine Constitution is a declaration of rights for the citizens of Maine. Sections of the article
that
are
frequently
connected
to
consideration
of
students
rights
are:
section
3,
which
provides
religious
freedom,
section
4,
which
provides
freedom
of
speech
and
publication;
section
5,
which
prohibits
unreasonable
searches;
and
section
6,
which
identifies
the
rights
of
accused
persons
and
their
right
to
due
process.
COMPENDIUM NOTEBOOK
L. Roche, p. 16
Maine does not have tenure laws. Instead the state provides for a two-year probationary period for all
teachers,
during
which
time
school
administrators
are
responsible
to
train
and
mentor
new
teachers.
At
the
end
of
the
probationary
period,
if
it
is
determined
by
the
school
administrators
that
the
teachers
are
worthy
of
retention,
they
are
offered
a
contract
for
one
or
more
years.
If,
however,
it
is
determined
that
the
new
teachers
are
not
worthy
of
retention,
those
teachers
do
not
receive
a
contract.
Those
teachers
also
have
a
right
to
due
process.
If
th
their
notification
of
nonrenewal
is
not
made
before
May
15 ,
the
teacher
may
file
a
complaint
with
the
educational
commissioner,
who,
upon
finding
that
this
notification
was
not
done
in
by
the
appropriate
time,
will
require
the
school
to
pay
forfeiture
to
the
teacher.
These
provisions
regarding
the
nomination
and
election
of
teachers
are
identified
in
Title
20-A,
13201.
To protect the quality and consistency of student instruction, the law provides safeguards against
unwarranted
dismissal
of
teachers.
If
a
teachers
contract
is
not
to
be
renewed,
the
teacher
must
receive
written
notification
6
months
prior
to
non-renewal.
Just
cause
for
such
dismissal
or
non-renewal
may
follow
protocol
in
accordance
with
Title
26,
964-A.
When
changes
in
local
conditions
warrant
the
elimination
of
the
teaching
position
for
which
the
contract
was
made,
the
school
board
has
the
right
to
terminate
a
teachers
contract,
so
long
as
due
notice
of
90
days
has
been
granted.
The
order
of
layoff
and
recall
is
a
negotiable
item
in
accordance
with
the
guidelines
covered
in
Title
20-A,
13201.
In
any
negotiated
agreement,
the
criteria
negotiated
by
the
school
board
and
the
bargaining
agent
to
establish
the
order
of
layoff
and
recall
must
include
the
teacher's
effectiveness
rating
(as
required
by
Title
20-A,
13703)
as
a
factor
and
may
also
include,
but
may
not
be
limited
to,
seniority.
The Maine Department of Labor offers protection to employees who report or refuse to commit illegal
acts
through
the
Whistleblowers
Protection
Act
(Title
5-B,
833).
The
law
states
that
it
is
illegal
for
an
employer
to
dismiss,
threaten,
retaliate,
or
treat
an
employee
differently
because
the
employee:
reported
a
violation
of
a
state
or
federal
law;
is
a
healthcare
worker
who
reported
a
medical
error;
reported
something
that
risked
someones
health
or
safety;
refused
to
do
something
that
would
endanger
his/her
life
or
someone
elses
life
and
asked
the
employer
to
correct
it;
or
have
been
involved
in
an
investigation
or
hearing
held
by
the
government.
The
law
protects
employees
who
have
told
their
employer
about
a
problem
and
allowed
the
employer
reasonable
time
to
correct
the
problem,
and
employees
who
have
good
reason
to
believe
their
employer
will
not
correct
the
problem.
3.
Child
abuse
and
neglect
law
The Child and Family Services and Child Protections Act, Title 22, 4003, requires the healthy and safety of
children to be the highest concern, and even if a familys integrity may be jeopardized, the right of children to be
COMPENDIUM NOTEBOOK
L. Roche, p. 17
protected
from
abuse
and
neglect
is
not
to
be
ignored,
which
may
require
removal
from
the
home
and
placement
in
a
foster
home
or
institutional
living.
Maine
law
(Title
22,
4011-A)
requires
certain
people
to
report
suspected
child
abuse,
neglect,
or
exploitation.
Among
those
mandated
to
report
such
cases
are
school
teachers,
guidance
counselors,
nurses,
social
workers,
psychologists,
speech
and
occupational
therapists,
school
resource
officers,
and
bus
drivers.
If
the
crime
is
being
committed
by
a
non-relative
or
a
death
is
involved,
the
district
attorneys
office
must
be
notified.
If
a
staff
member
is
committing
the
crime,
the
head
of
the
school
or
district
must
be
notified
and
from
there,
the
district
attorneys
office
shall
be
notified.
In
all
cases,
the
Department
of
Health
and
Human
Services
will
be
notified.
4.
State
textbook
selection
guidelines?
Title 20-A, 1001(10-A) grants school boards the duty of adopting a policy to govern the selection of
educational
materials,
such
as
textbooks,
and
the
opportunity
and
expectation
to
approve
such
materials.
Title
30-
A.
5724.6
states
that
a
municipality
may
raise
or
appropriate
funds
for
the
purchase
of
secular
textbooks
which
have
been
approved
by
the
school
committee
or
board
of
directors
for
use
in
public
schools
in
the
municipality
or
district
and
to
loan
those
textbooks
to
student
or
to
the
parents
of
students
attending
nonpublic
elementary
and
secondary
schools.
5.
Are
there
specific
statutes
that
relate
to
protections
against
employee
discrimination
(may
be
covered
in
Module
4,
but
this
is
employee
not
student)
Article I of the Maine Constitution is a declaration of rights for the citizens of Maine. Section 6 of the
article
provides
teachers
the
right
to
due
process,
equal
protection
of
the
laws,
and
civil
rights
and
the
expectation
of
non-discrimination.
In
addition
to
discrimination
protections
within
the
educational
setting
set
forth
in
Title
5,
4602,
Title
5,
4572
deems
it
unlawful
for
an
employer
to
discriminate
against
any
applicant
for
employment
because
of
race
or
color,
sex,
sexual
orientation,
physical
or
mental
disability,
religion,
age,
ancestry
or
national
origin.
It
also
states
that
it
is
unlawful
for
an
employer
to
discriminate
against
any
qualified
applicant
with
a
disability.
6.
Any
state
court
cases
or
cases
settled
within
your
Circuit
Court
involving
teacher
rights?
Barbara Wytrwal v. Saco School Board (1995) involved a former special education teacher who sued the
then-Superintendent
of
Schools,
the
Saco
School
Board,
and
the
City
of
Saco
for
retaliatory
nonrenewal
of
her
employment
contract
under
the
Civil
Rights
Act
(42
U.S.C.
1983,
the
Maine
Whistleblowers'
Protection
Act,
(26
M.R.S.A.
833.1),
and
a
common
law
theory
of
intentional
infliction
of
emotional
distress.
Following
a
bench
trial,
the
district
court
denied
all
of
the
appellant's
claims.
The
First
Circuit
Court
of
Appeals
upheld
the
decision.
COMPENDIUM NOTEBOOK
L. Roche, p. 18
Chapter 502 of Title 20-A provides all of the states regulations on the certification of educational
personnel,
including
the
requirements
to
hold
each
type
of
teaching
certificate;
i.e.
administrator
certificate,
teacher
endorsement,
educational
specialist
certificate,
middle
level
endorsement,
adult
education
endorsement,
or
career
and
technical
endorsement.
Teachers
in
any
public
elementary
or
secondary
school
or
any
private
school
receiving
basic
approval
under
2901
in
Maine
must
be
certified
as
mandated
by
Title
20-A,
13003.
The
only
exception
to
this
rule
is
for
approved
private
schools
under
2901.
The
Maine
Department
of
Education
Certification
Office
administers
the
rules
of
the
State
Board
of
Education
relating
to
the
issuing
of
credentials
to
teachers
employed
in
or
under
contract
with
public
and
approved
private
schools.
Initial
credentialing
instructions
must
be
followed
with
specific
requirements
being
met
depending
on
the
level
of
certificate
being
sought.
For
the
renewal
of
certification,
the
Certification
Office
will
send
applications
automatically
to
teachers
when
their
certification
is
up
for
renewal.
2.
Hiring
and
appointment
laws/regulations.
Title 5, 4576 regards the expectation that there is gender equity in the hiring of school administrators.
3.
What
is
cause
for
termination
of
a
teacher?
Once again, the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that no state may "deprive
Title 20-A, 13802 provides regulation for teacher and principal evaluation models. It is the State
Department
of
Education
that
will
provide
models
with
multiple
measures
for
evaluation
of
professional
performance
of
teachers
and
principals
employed
within
the
state.
School
administrative
units
are
also
permitted
to
develop
and
adopt
their
own
models
for
teacher
and
principal
evaluation.
Each
school
administrative
unit
within
Maine
must
select
and
incorporate
one
or
more
of
the
models
proposed
by
the
state
for
the
evaluation
of
the
professional
performance
of
a
teacher
or
principal.
Title 20-A, 13004.2 requires the department of education to keep transcripts, recommendations, and
other documents submitted for certification to maintain confidentiality except to school boards, superintendents,
COMPENDIUM NOTEBOOK
L. Roche, p. 19
and
the
individual
to
whom
they
apply.
6101
regulates
what
information
may
be
kept
in
a
teachers
personal
file,
who
maintains
the
file,
and
who
has
access
to
the
file.
Per
6102,
an
employee
may
review
his/her
personal
file
maintained
within
his/her
school
where
the
files
are
kept
and
during
school
hours.
These
files
may
include,
at
least,
formal
or
informal
evaluations
and
reports
relating
to
the
employee's
character,
credit,
work
habits,
compensation
and
benefits.
5.
Union
and
collective
bargaining
regulations
that
could
include
delineation
of
the
powers
of
teachers
unions,
time-frame
for
the
process,
what
can
and
cannot
be
negotiated.
Title 20-A, 1464 identifies the states expectations around collective bargaining. When school units are
merging
to
become
one
collective
bargaining
unit,
the
longest
withstanding
contract
is
honored
unless
mutually
agreed
upon.
If
the
contract
is
not
mutually
agreed
upon,
then
a
common
expiration
date
must
be
created,
which
will
be
determined
by
the
longest
contract.
This
date
is
when
the
collective
bargaining
unit
is
complete
in
its
formation.
All
contracts
and
wages
will
be
honored.
Collective bargaining is used by employees to help negotiate contracts and usually begins when
employees
join
a
union
and
elect
representatives.
Employees
who
are
part
of
the
collective
bargaining
process
must
meet
at
reasonable
times.
If
negotiations
include
monetary
increases
then
the
bargaining
agent
must
serve
written
notice
requesting
collective
bargaining
at
least
120
days
before
the
conclusion
of
the
current
fiscal
operating
budget.
In
the
Maine
teachers
can
negotiate
wages,
hours,
working
conditions,
and
contract
grievance
arbitration.
Contracts
cannot
be
negotiated
for
a
lifespan
greater
than
three
years.
Maine
teachers
cannot
negotiate
educational
policies,
which
cannot
address
wages,
hours,
working
conditions,
and
contract
grievance
arbitration.
6.
Other
items.
In the City of Biddeford Board of Education v. Biddeford Teachers Association (1973), the Maine Supreme
Court
looked
at
which
topics
are
suitable
for
inclusion
in
collective
bargaining
agreement
and
which
are
not
(and
whats
in
between).
The
court
determined
that
mandatory
topics
of
negotiations
include:
attendance
of
teachers
when
students
are
not
present,
non-teaching
duties,
and
sick
leave
banks.
The
court
determined
the
following
topics
to
be
illegal
to
negotiation
(and/or
include
in
collective
bargaining
agreements):
scheduling
of
school
vacations,
beginning
and
ending
of
school
year
when
students
are
involved;
length
of
work
day/work
year;
and
class
size.
Statement
of
Academic
Honesty:
I
have
read
and
understand
that
plagiarism
policy
as
outlined
in
the
Student
Plagiarism
and
Academic
Misconduct
document
relating
to
the
Honesty/Cheating
Policy.
By
attaching
this
statement
to
the
title
page
of
my
paper,
I
certify
that
the
work
submitted
is
my
original
work
developed
specifically
for
this
course
and
to
the
MSED
program.
If
it
is
found
that
cheating
and/or
plagiarism
did
take
place
in
the
writing
of
this
paper,
I
acknowledge
the
possible
consequences
of
the
act/s,
which
could
include
expulsion
from
the
University
of
New
England.