Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Griffith University,
Nathan, School Of Environment. Melita Brown S2897363;
Cavannah Deller S2861296; Nathan Griffey S2794757; Kori
Humphreys S2843730; Olivia Short - S2820287
Table of Contents
Table of Contents ..........................................................................3
Table of Figures, Tables & Maps: ...................................................4
Executive Summary .......................................................................5
1.0
Introduction .......................................................................6
2.0
Methodology .....................................................................7
3.0
Site Overview.....................................................................8
3.1
Demographics ....................................................................... 8
3.2
History .................................................................................. 9
3.3
Planning Context ................................................................. 10
3.4
Historical Comparison ......................................................... 11
3.4.1
Green Space & Recreation ................................................11
3.4.2 Transport Infrastructure ......................................................... 12
3.4.3
Industrial............................................................................12
3.4.4
River Usage ........................................................................13
3.4.5
Residential .........................................................................13
3.4.6
Urban Renewal & Mixed Use ............................................14
Executive Summary
Understanding the complex nature of the urban environment is vitally important to planners. By examining
the features of the urban form and the prominent socio-economic characteristics of an area, accurate
decisions can be made as the the future of the area. This investigation was undertaken to gain an in-depth
understanding of a suburb within Brisbane.
Newstead was selected as the study area for this investigation. This decision was made due to recent
growth, which has seen the suburb go from an industrial area to a prominent urban centre within Brisbane.
Over the past 20 years housing prices and population have rapidly increased, leading to a higher socioeconomic class, majority of which are couples without children. Field analysis techniques were employed to
grasp an understanding of the dynamics within Newstead and determine how planners might effectively
allocate resources to provide for the expected future growth of the area.
The first stage in the analysis of Newstead was a Photographic Essay. Multiple field visits were conducted to
determine the main characteristics and main themes of the area. Five significant themes were established
to be of importance to the area. These themes are; transport, residential, industrial, urban renewal and
mixed use, and green space. Historical photographs of Newstead were compared to current photographs of
the same areas in order to understand the changing land use of the suburb.
The initial field visits highlighted the most active areas, which were investigated for the second stage of the
fieldwork process a Behavioural Setting Analysis. Five locations throughout Newstead were observed to
provide insight as to how the areas are used by residents and visitors. The five locations investigated were;
Gasworks Plaza, the Teneriffe Ferry Terminal, the Chester Street precinct, Florence Street and Stratton
Street. These areas were investigated at three different times during the weekday and weekend, and the
flow of people through these locations was determined. The investigation found Gasworks Plaza is busy at
all hours of the day on weekdays and over the weekend, whilst other areas such as Teneriffe Ferry Terminal
and Chester Street are only busy at certain times during the day.
The Spatial Analysis was the third stage of the field investigation into Newstead. This analysis established
three town centres in the area Gasworks Plaza and Commercial Road and Florence Street. These areas are
surrounded by a large amount of facilities, which correlated with the Behavioural Analysis. The facilities
located in Newstead include public transport, dining and entertainment, health care facilities, public
services, places of worship, sport and recreation and retail.
The final layer of analysis was the Environmental Quality Audit. Twelve sample points were audited against
Knoxs 1976 Index Schedule for the Assessment of Environmental Quality in order to determine the overall
environmental quality of Newstead. Knoxs Index includes elements such as appearance, access, amenity
and provision, which was then tailored to include flooding and a provision for commercial areas. The points
were selected using the Brisbane City Plan 2014 Zoning Map, and evenly spread through the zones.
Through these investigative techniques, a complete understanding of Newstead was developed. The
investigation has highlighted the way in which people interact with places and the influence that planning
has over these behaviours and the environment of an area.
1.0 Introduction
Fieldwork is an integral part in urban and environmental planning, as it is
important to obtain an understanding of an area before undertaking any
development. This report details the findings and methodology of an urban
analysis undertaken in the Queensland suburb of Newstead. Newstead is an
inner-city suburb located approximately two kilometers from Brisbanes CBD
(Map 1). This report has been split into four sections and aims to develop an
understanding of the historic and current land uses of Newstead, the
behavioural patterns of visitors to the area, the relationship between main roads
and the facilities and the environmental quality of Newstead.
Part one is a Photographic Essay which will familiarize the reader with the area,
and introduce the five themes which will be focused on. These themes are;
transport, residential, industrial, urban renewal and green space. Part one will
also include historical photos comparing the suburb against now and then.
Part two comprises of a Behaviour Setting Analysis, a technique used to examine
the way in which urban environments affect peoples behaviour. Five Behaviour
Settings were chosen and studied Teneriffe Ferry Terminal, Florence Street,
Chester Street, Stratton Street, and Gasworks Plaza.
Part three is a Spatial Analysis, which is a set of analytical techniques used to
examine the relationship between objects in space. This report focuses on the
spatial pattern of facilities within Newstead.
The final layer of analysis is an Environmental Quality Audit of Newstead. Twelve
sample points within the suburb were selected and assessed against Knoxs 1976
Index Schedule for the Assessment of Environmental Quality, in order to
determine the overall quality of the environment in Newstead.
This report is intended to enhance the understanding of Newstead, and build a
true representation of the suburb. The report and studies were prepared and
conducted under the guidance of the course convener and tutors.
Map 1: Newstead Location Map, (Brown, 2015; Google, 2015; Brown, 2015).
2.0 Methodology
In order to gain a preliminary understanding of Newstead, desktop research was undertaken, which established the background of the area and provided
context for the analysis. Information was gathered from the Australian Bureau of Statistics and the Brisbane City Plan 2014, as well as historical sources.
These resources enabled the characteristics of the suburbs to be understood, and illustrated the key elements which influence the urban environment and
its relationship to the local residents.
The first phase of the fieldwork, Photographic Essay, highlights the groups initial understanding of Newstead. The photographs used represent the
authenticity of the urban environment and produced five main themes of Newstead green space and recreation, transport, heritage, and urban renewal
and mixed use. The photographs were analysed and used in conjunction with historical photographs to showcase the changing land use of the suburb
throughout history.
The Behaviour Setting is the second step in the analysis process. Behaviour Setting is a technique which examines and explains the link between the urban
environment and social behaviours. Five study sites were selected and studied at various times throughout the weekdays and weekends. An extra site was
selected on the basis of a spare however after considering the first few visits, it was determined that this site was no longer needed. The behaviours
identified were analysed, which highlighted how people interact with urban environment and the influence which planning has over these behaviours.
The third step in the analysis of Newstead was a Spatial Analysis. Spatial Analysis is a tool which examines the relationship between objects and space. The
first stage of the Spatial Analysis was undertaken using Google Earth, and measuring the distance of the facilities listed to the nearest main road. As Google
Earth is outdated, the analysis was then completed manually and extra facilities were added. This enabled the relationship of facilities to the main road to
be established, and therefore the urban structure of Newstead.
The final step in the analysis of Newstead is the Environmental Quality Audit. This was undertaken using Knoxs 1967 Index Schedule for the Assessment
of Environmental Quality, which was tailored to suit Newstead, as the original did not cover all aspects of the suburb and some aspects were found to be
irrelevant. Knoxs (1976) Index was used to assess twelve audit points within Newstead, in order to determine the overall environmental quality of
Newstead. The environmental quality was then linked to the quality of life of residents in Newstead.
Throughout the analysis of Newstead, desktop research was heavily relied on for theoretical frameworks and to understand the process at play.
3.1 Demographics
The socio-economic differences between Greater Brisbane and Newstead (Figure 7) include the median
weekly income per household is higher in Newstead, as is the median weekly rent and median monthly
repayments (ABS, 2011a). An article published by the Commonwealth Bank suggests that Newstead is a high
end property hot spot, evident in the median weekly rent when compared to Greater Brisbane (Double,
2014). The high socio-economic status and low median age of Newstead may also contribute to the high
percentage of renters when compared to Greater Brisbane (Figures 8 and 9). The status of the area can also
be linked to the professions of Newsteads residents 100% of the residents are employed in administration,
professional or managerial roles, compared to Greater Brisbane, where 26% of the population do a trade
(ABS, 2011a).
The suburb of Newstead has a population of 5,537 as at the 2011 Census, with a median age of 34 (ABS,
2011a). The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) paints an interesting picture of Newstead when compared
to Greater Brisbane. The family composition in Newstead and Greater Brisbane (Figures 3 and 4), according
to the ABS, 70% of Newstead is comprised of couples without children, compared to 37% of Greater Brisbane
(ABS, 2011a). Similarly, 20% of Newstead is couples with children, compared to 45% in Greater Brisbane.
This may be explained by the lack of schools within Newstead, and the closest school is more than a
kilometer away from the central hub of Newstead.
Figure 7: Cost of Living for Newstead and Greater Brisbane (ABS, 2011)
The housing composition within Newstead is also dramatically different to that of Greater Brisbane, as
demonstrated (Figures 5 and 6). In Newstead, 88% of the population live in flats, units or apartments
compared to 12% of Greater Brisbane (ABS, 2011a). It is easy to make a connection to the apartment living
lifestyle in Newstead and the family composition.
Figure 5: Housing Composition of Newstead (ABS, 2011a) Figure 6: Greater Brisbane Housing Composition (ABS, 2011a)
Figure 9: Newstead and Greater Brisbane Home Ownership Status (ABS, 2011)
3.2 History
Booroodabin, the traditional name for the Newstead area, was once a large Ti Tree swamp and a favourite
hunting ground of the Turrubal people (Hacker, 2009). Newstead Point was one of the first areas of Brisbane
settled by Europeans (Hacker, 2009). On 16th September, 1824 Captain John Oxley first camped on
Newstead Point, and had breakfast by the creek now known as Breakfast Creek (Hacker 2009). The area was
first mapped out by James Warner in 1839 and it was not until the 1850s that the area was settled and the
Ti Tree swamps were drained in the 1880s (New Farm & Districts Historical Society, 2013). The earliest
known form of public transport in the area was a horse bus which was taken to the northern side of
Breakfast Creek, which was crossed by boat and continued into the city by horse tram (Hacker, 2009). Steam
ferries were also a popular form of public transport, and the earliest recorded was the Balmoral in 1909,
which operated between Bulimba and Commercial Road, Newstead (Hacker, 2009). The construction of the
Breakfast Creek Bridge in 1887, allowed for easier access (Hacker 2009) and in approximately 1913, an
electric tram line was installed in the area, and houses were being built at the rate of 350 per year (Hacker,
2009). The area was considered one of the best places to live, due to its proximity to the city its public
transport.
Teneriffe Brewery, located on the corner of Macquarie, Florence and Wilson Streets. The site was purchased
in 1907 by Dalgety and Co., who built the first of the Newstead Wharves and the first Woolstore in the area
(New Farm & Districts Historical Society, 2013). The Booroodabin Bowls Club was formed in 1888, and is the
oldest bowls club in Queensland still in existence, and is still in its original location (ABC News, 2009).
The river has always been an important part of the suburb (ABC, 2009). Norman R. Wright and Jack Whereat
began their boat building businesses along the river on Newstead Terrace in the early 1900s (Hacker, 2009).
The river and Breakfast Creek were home to a plethora of different types of boats, all for different uses.
There were many rowing clubs, yacht clubs and sailing squadrons in the area, and the river front was used
for the coal and wool industries (Hacker 2009). In 1923, the Newstead Wharves (Figure 12) ran from the
Teneriffe Ferry, Commercial Road to Methyr Road in New Farm (Hacker, 2009). The wharves were serviced
by rail, which closed in 1970. In 1988, the Newstead Wharves were redeveloped into the Boardwalk that is
still in use (Hacker, 2009).
World War II had a profound impact on the area, as many American servicemen were posted. At the time it
was feared Newstead was a major target for bombs, and many people left the area (New Farm & Districts
Historical Society, 2013). A memorial was established in 1951 to remember the American servicemen who
fought alongside the Australians (Newstead House, 2015).
Figure 11: Waterloo Hotel After a Major Flood (Spirit Hotel Group, 2013)
In the past, Newstead was, and continues to be, a mix of commercial, industrial, residential and recreational
uses. One of the oldest buildings in the area is the Waterloo Hotel (Figure 10), which opened for business in
1866 and is still open today (Spirit Hotel Group, 2013). One main industry was gas, for lighting and or
telephones and so the Newstead Gas Works (Figure 11) was commissioned in 1883 and by 1887 was the
main gas site in Brisbane (King, 2015). The plant continued to operate until 1967, when gas production was
ceased due to the production of Butane for electricity. The Gasometer still stands in Newstead and was
added to the heritage register in 2005 (Hacker, 2009). In 1882, the Queensland Brewing Co. established the
10
Map 4: Photo Location Map: Green space and Recreation Historical Comparison (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015, Brown,
2015)
Map 3: Photo Location Map: Historical Comparison (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015; Brown, 2015)
11
Figure 13: Historical Comparison; Newstead House from Coronation Drive: Photo 1: 1961 (NLA Catalog #4590773).
Photo 2: 2015 (Humphreys, 2015)
The old bridge was erected in the 1800s and stood for almost 70 years (Hacker, 2009). In comparing the
two images one thing that stands out is the use of trams. The old bridge was frequently used by trams, in
comparison to the modern day usage of cars. This along with the general aesthetics of the bridge signify
the change in history.
3.4.3 Industrial
In history Byres Street, Newstead was a dominant industrial area (Map 6). The historical comparison of this
area could be seen as two separate locations (Figure 15). This is due to almost all of the buildings in the
photos being different and the only building that remains is the white coloured building to the right.
The area is zoned as low impact industry (Map 2) and by examining the area, it was found that there was a
mix of small shops, offices and warehouses. It is interesting to note that in the first photo to the right there
seems to be a residential dwelling. This obviously is not the case in the current photo and reflects changes
to the area and its planning.
Another interesting difference is the level of landscaping in front of the buildings to the left. There is well
kept grass and shrubs as well as tall palm trees. This is a great contrast to the previous building which looks
to have very un-kept grass in front and little thought put into its looks. This could be due to the vast number
of changes the suburb has encountered in recent decades.
Map 5: Photo Location Map: Transport Historical Comparison (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015; Brown, 2015)
Map 6: Photo Location Map: Industrial Historical Comparison (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015,
Brown, 2015)
Figure 14: Historical Comparison photo; Breakfast Creek Bridge; Photo 1: 1958 (State Library of Queensland and John
Oxley Library, Catalogue #115106). Photo 2: 2015 (Griffey, 2015)
12
Figure 16: Historical Comparison; Newstead from Newstead Park; Photo 1: 1926 (Queensland State Archives, 1926).
Photo 2: 2015 (Short, 2015)
Figure 15: Historical Comparison; Byres street; Photo 1: 1969 (BCC, 1969). Photo 2: 2015 (Griffey, 2015)
There are a number of differences in Newstead between the 1920s until now, when the area was mainly
used for industry such as gas manufacturing and shipping (Hacker, 2009). Obvious differences include the
addition of the pier to the left, the addition to of the boardwalk in the foreground and the apartments. In
the recent photo, the Newstead wharves are no longer used for industry, and are instead used for the
Teneriffe City Cat terminal. The orange circle on the historical photo indicate the wharves, and the orange
circle on the recent photo indicate the City Cat stop. The green circle in the photographs indicates the
Mactaggarts Woolstores, which were built in 1926 (Hacker, 2009). As can be seen in the recent photo, the
Woolstores are still standing and are used for residential purposes.
3.4.5 Residential
The Roseville Estate is one of the most prestigious mansions in South East Queensland (Figure 17), and is
historically recognised as the crowning jewel of Queenslands changing residential landscape (Homes with
a History, 2015). The house is located towards the South-Eastern boundary of Newstead and is a dominant
historical structure (Map 8). Roseville is of a very traditional style with high ceilings, immaculate landscaping,
as well as wooden accents and lattice highlights. Houses in Newstead had a predominant Victorian
architecture style, and most of the homes have a simple, respectable elegance to their aesthetics. It is
common to have facades similar to stucco with rendered cast iron lacework on verandas and balustrades.
Slate or corrugated galvanized iron, with timber eaves are the materials used on the roofs of most homes.
The original design of a Victorian home in the 19th century also included a highly dense landscape in the
back yard. Which also highlighted a sense of security as well as a symbol of status. Since the construction
of the suburb and its homes, a high percentage of the residential houses have undergone remodelling,
however, it can be said that a lot of the original character have been highlighted through the new designs.
However, the property now boasts fully enclosed lawns on the perimeter of the block, large trees, and
manicured hedges. The original design can still be seen through subtle finishes like the roofing style,
Victorian entry, and the lead light finishes. Although, the modern day expectations of automated doors and
gates, solar panels, and full glass windows and doors are now evident (Figure 17).
Map 7: Photo Location Map: River Usage Historical comparison (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015; Brown, 2015)
13
Map 8: Photo Location Map: Residential Historical Comparison (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015; Brown, 2015)
Map 9: Photo Location Map: Urban Renewal and Mixed Use Historical Comparison (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015;
Brown, 2015)
There are significant differences that can be seen between 1928 and today, not only with the building itself
but also in the foreground (Figure 18). These photos show the progression of the street over the last eightyseven years. What was once a barren strip of dirt for some of the first motorised vehicles, is now a fluctuating
streetscape filled with life. As you can see, there was also a tram or train line which is now removed, as is
the service in this area.
Figure 17: Historical Comparison; Roseville House: Photo 1 (Homes with a History, 2015) and Photo 2, 2015
(Humphreys, 2015)
Figure 18: Woolstores at Southern end of Macquarie Street; Photo 1: 1928 (Digital Atlas Pty Ltd., 2015). Photo 2:
2015 (Humphreys, 2015)
14
After its construction, the Newstead Gasworks site was the main gas site in Brisbane (Figure 19). Back in the
1990s the Brisbane Gas Company ceased business due to the introduction of natural gas usage in
Queensland (Re: Gasworks Plaza, Newstead [Blog post], 2013). Since then there has been a significant
amount of development in the area. It can also be seen that the renovations in this area are not quite
complete (cranes for construction and lollipop lady for road works).
Figure 19: Historical Comparison, Gasworks; Photo 1: 1954 (King, 2015). Photo 2: 2015 (Humphreys, 2015)
The common theme of urban renewal in Newstead has carried on in the Woolstores and in the gasworks
area. Each of these historical places has undergone some form of progress to create a space that livens the
suburb. Each place is now an area of mixed use. The gasworks area is now known as Gasworks Plaza and
houses dining and retails spaces, an office building and an underground car park. The original Gasometer is
still intact, and is used as a community space (Figure 19).
15
Map 10: Photo Location Map: Photo Essay (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015; Brown, 2015)
16
Located in the southwest corner of the suburb, is Teneriffe Park. it is situated on top of a hill with a view of
the Brisbane CBD, and contains a playground for children and several park benches and picnic tables (Figure
22). This park is more commonly utilised than the smaller park near Newstead house, primarily due to its
increased size and provision for childrens use.
At 11:15am on a Wednesday, the park was quite quiet however, on a weekend it would be much busier as
it is situated in the middle of a heavy residential area and would be the perfect location for families wanting
to enjoy recreation activities outside of their homes.
Map 11: Photo Location Map: Green space and Recreation (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015)
Figure 22: Teneriffe Park (Humphreys, 2015)
17
4.3 Transport
In Newstead there are a number of different transport options, most of these are found close to the river
due to the suburbs reliance on the ferry system (Map 12). The public transport system is quite well
connected, there are extensive bike paths and a boardwalk along the river that connects the Teneriffe City
Cat stop to New Farm Park. Vernon Terrace, a main thoroughfare which connects New Farm to Newstead
(Figure 23), is evidently private cars as the prominent form of transport in the area. Street parking is available
in most, if not all of Newstead.
The Teneriffe CityCat terminal (Figure 25) is also surrounded by a bus stop area with the CityGlider servicing
the area (Figure 24). The amount of seats in the bus shelter indicates the bus system is heavily used in
Newstead. At the time of taking the photograph there were 3 buses pulled up and there are seven bus
routes that travel through Newstead (393, 199, 60, 470, 300, 306 and 322). These routes connect Newstead
with the Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital, the CBD, South Bank, West End, the Northern suburbs and
the Western Suburbs (TRANSLink, 2015). The CityCat stop directs passengers into the CBD, Saint Lucia,
towards Hamilton, as well as the Bulimba Teneriffe Cross River Ferry. The image shows the newlyrenovated Teneriffe stop and a City Cat docked at the stop. The path in front of the stop, with the woman
pushing a pram, is connected to the boardwalk and is often used for cyclists and pedestrians.
There is also a CityCycle station (Figure 26), which is situated in Newstead on Vernon Terrace and the lack
of bikes docked at the station suggests they are regularly used. The photograph also shows a bike path on
the road working in harmony with the car traffic. The last photograph is of a sign pointing cyclists and
pedestrians to the Riverwalk which connects the area to the surrounding suburb of New Farm (Figure 26).
The sign also points to the Brisbane River, suggesting that it is one of the main features of the suburb.
Map 12: Photo Location Map: Transport (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015; Brown, 2015)
Figure 25: Teneriffe Ferry Terminal (Humphreys, 2015)
18
4.4 Heritage
Newstead is known for a number of important historical sites, such as Newstead House (Map 13). Which
was an important element during the growth of the Brisbane region over the past few decades. The house
was originally used in 1853 as an unofficial Government House, as well as being used as a barrack for the
United States Army in 1942 (Newstead House, 2015). The Queensland Womens Historical Society have also
used the house as a facility however, since 1981 the house has undergone a number of restorations
(Newstead House, 2015).
Newstead House has also changed along with planning schemes, in 1921 the grounds were redesigned to
advocate the inclusion of parklands into urban design (Figure 27). Currently, the grounds are still used as a
recreational facility and provides a range of facilities to the public (Newstead House, 2015).
Map 13: Photo Location Map: Heritage (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015; Brown, 2015)
19
Map 14: Photo Location Map: Urban Renewal and Mixed Use (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015,
Brown, 2015)
Newstead is a
mixed use area which includes residential, commercial, industrial, cultural and commercial areas. The many
different industries include places such as the Eagers car yard dates back to 1913 (AP Eagers, 2015). Urban
renewal is also strongly evident and the two themes are often intertwined. This is specifically shown in the
Gasworks Plaza (Figure 29) which was once used by the Brisbane Gas Company, now the area is an avenue
for recreation, shopping, dining and work (Figure 31). The woolstores also signify these themes.
The woolstores have undergone perhaps the most dramatic transformation since the 1970s than any other
location in the area. Each Woolstore has created a mixed use space for the suburb which is thriving with
activity. There are many retail shops and restaurants scattered throughout Newstead. These are often
incorporated into buildings along with office spaces, or in the example of the woolstores apartments
(Figure 28).
20
The London Woolstore in particular was revamped into a mixed use space in 2005. This in particular building
was for the storage of wool bales awaiting transportation from the river (Spiel, 2014). The refurbishment
created a mix of apartments in the upper floors and a wide variety of restaurants and some other
commercial uses on the street level (Figure 30) to create a lively footpath. The Newstead area is also a
hotspot for developments currently (Figure 32) which will more than likely boost this mixed use feature in
the area upon completion.
4.6 Conclusion
These photos represent the key themes of the area with respect to the urban environment and its
authenticity. The key themes that were investigated and found to be important are; green space and
recreation, transport, urban renewal and mixed use, and heritage.
The images presented in the Photographic Essay depict Newstead as a thriving and diverse suburb. The
various themes indicate that the area is not used just by local residents, but many of the facilities are
intended for the wider public. The four themes identified in the area are green space and recreation,
transport, urban renewal & mixed use, and heritage. There are two large parks within Newstead which are
21
open to the public, and one has a childrens playground. The public transport and road networks ensure
Newstead is well connected to the surrounding suburbs and there are a number of public transport stops
through the area. The mixed use theme is prevalent throughout Newstead, where houses are adjacent to
commercial properties and cafs are located in the bottom of apartment blocks. Heritage is also a very
important theme in Newstead, as the Woolstores and Newstead House are very recognisable symbols of
the area. The Woolstores also link to urban renewal, as they have been repurposed to create trendy,
upmarket apartments. The Woolstores and Gasworks Plaza are excellent examples of how planning is being
utilised within the area to create a sense of place.
Behaviour Setting is a technique which is used to understand the ways in which the urban
environment affects peoples behaviour. This analysis builds on the Photographic Essay,
by delving further into the behaviours captured. As discussed by Lynch (1960), the
physical or urban environment can produce or hinder the development of the social
aspects of society. In order to understanding the Behaviour Settings of Newstead, five
study areas were chosen:
Teneriffe Ferry Precinct;
Gasworks Plaza;
Stretton Street Precinct;
Chester Street Precinct; and
Florence Street Precinct (Map 15).
These areas were selected based on the knowledge built from the Photographic Essay
and are areas which were considered significant enough for observation.
Field visits were conducted at 3 times of the day for both weekends and weekdays, each
for at least one hour (Appendix B). The observation notes include traffic flow and
direction, congregation areas, bus stops and other useful facilities of the area (Appendix
A). The types of people and their actions were also recorded. According to Johnson et al.
(2006), active participation in Behavioural Analysis is more effective than simple
observation. Due to this, a majority of the observations were undertaken with moderate
participation, although there was occasionally active and complete participation. From
this initial field work, more detailed maps were created and outlining the behaviours
observed in each study area and the influence the urban environment has on these
behaviours. This analysis allows for a deeper understanding of the impacts that planning
and design can have on an area, and the active participation from the community.
It is important to note that the observations were held over a two-week period which
were the September school holidays. Due to the holidays the observations and
subsequent analysis may not be a true representation of Newstead year-round. There is
also a number of events held in Newstead at various times throughout the year, none of
which were held during the observation period. These events include the Teneriffe
Festival, the Scandinavian Festival and the Newstead Food Night Safari (SuezEnvironment, 2015; Brisbane Kids, 2015; foodi, 2014). The music, culture and sense of
community generated through the events attract people from all over Brisbane. Events
are also held in Newstead surrounding major public holidays such as Anzac Day, Easter
and Christmas (Quest Newspapers, 2014).
Map 15: Behaviour Analysis Location Map (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015; Brown 2015)
22
depending on the time of day, the opening hours of the surrounding facilities and the arrival and departure
times of the ferries and buses. The area is predominantly used for transport facilities and exercising. Though,
unlike the early morning hours, it is seen that most active users were elderly and in pairs. Among these were
working professionals on lunch breaks or catching public transport. Based on the observations and the
TRANSLink website, the most common form of public transport in the area at this time of day is the buses,
particularly the CityGlider.
This is not the only physical attribute of the area that is insufficient. The seating in the area is primarily
surrounding the bus stops, which given the traffic in this space is acceptable, however the other primary
area of activity is the Ferry terminal, which has no seating (Figure 33). Ferry patrons were seen using the bus
stop seating and others were standing and waiting for long periods of time, indicating that seating is
necessary closer to or within the ferry terminal. These public transport users were seen at all times of the
day on both weekends and weekdays and therefore this seating is necessary.
In order for an area to be considered safe, the Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design, or CEPTED,
Principles need to be applied. These principles are surveillance, legibility, territoriality, ownership,
management and vulnerability (Queensland Government, 2007). One aspect of the surveillance principle is
lighting to avoid shadows and glare which might put people at risk (Queensland Government, 2007, p. 9).
Given this, the lighting in this precinct is insufficient (Figure 34). The area was considerably busier during the
day than at night, indicating that the space is unusable due to the inadequate lighting. This was observed
during field visits, as there was a lack of women and younger people in the area, and the people utilizing the
space had different behaviours than during the day, for example walking quickly in the shadows to enter
the light and looking around/keeping aware at all times. There is sufficient lighting surrounding the public
transport area, mostly due to its intended usage at night. However, it is evident that the area is in need of
more sufficient lighting to reduce shadows in order for the Riverwalk to be utilized more frequently at night.
23
Map 16: Teneriffe Ferry Terminal; Weekday Behaviour Analysis (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015; Brown, 2015)
24
Map 17: Teneriffe Ferry Terminal: Weekend Behaviour Analysis (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015; Brown 2015)
25
focused on the restaurants in the area with some active transport users observed. The significant difference
between that of weekend mornings and weekday mornings was the arrival of workers for the dining and
retail facilities. A majority of these stores are already open on weekday mornings due to the high traffic.
26
Figure 36: Photo 1; Garden Seating in Gasworks Plaza (Deller, 2015): Photo 2; Public Space Seating (Humphreys,
2015): Photo 3; Night View of the Main Path in Gasworks Plaza (Humphreys, 2015)
Map 18: Gasworks Plaza: Weekday Behaviour Analysis (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015; Brown, 2015)
27
Map 19: Gasworks Plaza: Weekend Behaviour Analysis (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015; Brown, 2015)
28
5.4.4Weekend Morning
Figure 37: Photo 1; Enclosed Pathway in Stratton Street (Deller, 2015): Photo 2; Street Lighting in Stratton Street
(Humphreys, 2015): Photo 3, Smoking Ledge on Stratton Street (Deller, 2015)
The area produced a lot of pedestrian traffic at this time of day. Majority of people were travelling alone
and were either actively using the space or passing-by. These people consisted of young adults who were
dressed for exercise or were construction workers. In comparison to many other areas in Newstead, this
area did not have a high level of activity and the amount of pedestrian traffic generated was not even
equivalent to a slow day at the Gasworks Plaza precinct.
5.4.5Weekend Day
There are other aspects of the environment in this area which encourage certain behaviours. One of these
is the smoking ledges (Figure 37, Photo 3) which are located adjacent to the bottle shop. These ledges are
accommodated with ashtrays and are conveniently wide enough for individuals to place their belongings
while having a cigarette. These were used at multiple times of the day, specifically at night.
The night is a less active space in the precinct. This is most likely due to the insufficient lighting in the area
which was observed by the team (Figure 37, Photo 2). This is much like the lighting mentioned for the
Teneriffe Ferry Precinct. The area sees activity throughout the day and occasionally during the morning for
both weekdays and weekends. However, the night only sees activity flourish around the meeting places such
as The Triffid and The Waterloo Hotel, as these areas provide a lighting. This lighting however is still
insufficient based on the CPTED principles by creating shadows everywhere but directly in front of the
buildings.
The area of this time of day was once again very quiet. There was a significant amount of facilities provided
in the area to facilitate a rise in activity, yet the area remained dormant. Majority of the people in the area
were travelling in pairs but there were a few singles and no groups observed. These people were relaxed,
causally talking and looking around. There were some people exercising, though most were passing-by,
rather than actively using the space. Despite facilities provided, there were no smokers observed throughout
this hour long investigation.
The area holds a rather bleak activity level in comparison to that of the other precincts observed. The area
is dominated by construction workers, some coming to work, some leaving, some passing-by and others
using the facilities to get their morning coffee or breakfast. There were a few people exercising, mostly
young adults alone. This appears to attract people that like to keep to themselves, due to the use of people
listening to music, looking down and avoiding active uses of the area.
29
Map 20: Stratton Street: Weekday Behaviour Analysis (Google, 2015;ESRI, 2015; Brown, 2015)
30
Map 21: Gasworks Plaza: Weekend Behaviour Analysis (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015; Brown, 2015)
31
people stopped within the precinct to watch. This caused the levels of activity to increase as people decided
to stop and sit or actively participate.
The lack of lighting may be attributed to the dependence of cars in the area. Due to the street parking on
both sides of the road and the width of the road (Figure 39, Photo 2), it can be assumed that pedestrian
access was not the intended use of the area. It is therefore possible that the lighting in the area is also an
avenue to encourage this type of transportation and was not seen necessary due to the intended car usage.
One less used facility in the area is the encouragement of community behaviour through the vegetable and
herb garden (Figure 39, Photo 3). Although this garden was rarely used, it is on public ground and is open to
everyone, which encourages community interaction.
32
Map 22: Chester Street: Weekday Behaviour Analysis (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015; Brown, 2015)
33
Map 23: Chester Street: Weekend Behaviour Analysis (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015; Brown, 2015)
34
couples. These people were very casually dressed. Apart from people exercising and going to and from the
restaurant, there was very limited pedestrian activity.
35
Map 24: Florence Street: Weekday Behaviour Analysis (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015; Brown, 2015)
36
Map 25: Florence Street: Weekend Behaviour Analysis (Google, 2015; ESRI, 2015; Brown, 2015)
37
38
Map 26: Spatial Analysis Base Map (Google, 2015; Short 2015)
Places of Worship
Retail
Open Space
Health Services
Sport and Recreation
Government Services
Dining
0
20
40
60
80
100
Figure 42: Graph describing the Average Distance From the Closest Main Road
for Each Use Category (Short, 2015)
39
Table 1: Spatial Distribution of Main Roads Against Individual Features of Newstead ( Short, 2015)
The accessibility of the public transport in Newstead can be deduced from map twenty-seven. The map indicates an exclusion zone of 400
meters around each bus stop and ferry terminal in Newstead, undertaken using Google Earth. It is easy to see that there are no areas within
the suburb that are not accessible via public transport, which contributes to the high walkability of the suburb. This also ties in with the
Environmental Quality Audit section of this report.
6.2.2 Dining and Entertainment
In recent years, Newstead has undergone an urban resurgence. This has resulted in a number of dining and entertainment venues in the
area (Table 1; Double, 2014). This dining culture in Newstead is evident in the Behavioural Analysis most of the activity was centered around
restaurants. From the field visits conducted, it is clear that the cafs and restaurants are not just for locals and attract people from all over
Brisbane. The Gasworks Plaza is a major dining precinct in Newstead is a destination which encourages people to visit the area. Gasworks
houses numerous dining venues ranging from casual dining to high end dining, as well as the original Gasometer, which as previously
mentioned, is lit up at night as a form of entertainment.
Map twenty-eight shows the obvious relationship between the main roads and the dining and entertainment facilities. The average distance
from a main road to a dining and entertainment facility was only approximately 30 meters, as demonstrated by table one. The average
distance to a main road for these facilities is quite short. This may be due to the convenience of the locations unless facilities are actively
sought out if they are not located near, or on, a main road they may fail. Dining and entertainment facilities rely on high traffic volumes,
which is achieved through being located on or near a main road.
6.2.7 Retail
Retail services is not a huge part of daily life in Newstead. The largest retail precinct is Gasworks Plaza, which houses a Woolworths, Standard
Market Company, a bottle shop, two hairdressing salons, an optometrist, a newsagent and a Lorna Jane. Another noticeable retail facility in
the area is the multiple car dealerships located along Breakfast Creek Road. These dealerships attract a number of customers from outside
40
Map 27: Public Transport Exclusion Zones (google, 2015; Brown, 2015)
Newstead, bringing more traffic through the area. Other retail facilities in the area include a storage facility, a cycling shop and smaller
grocers. Map twenty-eight indicates that majority of the retail facilities are located near to a main road, which is further reinforced
by Map twenty-nine.
6.3 Relationship Between Facilities, Main Roads and the Urban Structure
After undertaking the above analysis, it is evident Newstead has a linear town centre, as well as a separate town centre. The linear
centre follows Commercial Road and Florence Street, while the separate centre is Gasworks Plaza. There is some overflow, which is
represented by the yellow dotted lines in Map twenty-nine. These areas have been identified as having a large number of facilities
and hence are considered the centres of Newstead.
Although it is not common for there to be two centres which are not linked, Newstead is a suburb undergoing constant change and
urban renewal. Gasworks Plaza is a relatively new public space within Newstead and in the past, Commercial Road and Florence Street
may have been considered the only centres in the area. In the future the urban structure may change and the two could be linked, or
there could be a new centre entirely.
The Behavioural Analysis section of this report identified Gasworks as one of the busies areas in Newstead, more than likely due to
the dining and entertainment, health care, retail and sport and recreation facilities housed within Gasworks.
Zone Code
Purpose of Zone
Medium Density
Residential
Open Space
District Centre
Mixed Use
Provide for warehouse, service industry and low impact industry uses
Non-industrial and business uses that support activities which do not compromise the longterm use of the land
Sport and
Recreation
Character Infill
Housing
Provide a range of organised activities where the uses require a level of built infrastructure
Map 28: Relationship With Main Road (google, 2015; Short, 2015)
41
Low Medium
Density Residential
Special Purpose
6.5 Conclusion
Newstead is a well connected area with a wide range of facilities available to the public. These facilities
include:
Transport and access;
Dining and entertainment;
Places of worship;
Health care;
Government facilities;
Petrol stations;
Sports and recreation facilities; and
Retail.
These facilities are generally close to main roads, and form two town centres a linear centre located along
Commercial Road and Florence Street, and a hub located at Gasworks Plaza. The placement of these facilities
are influenced by the zoning of the area, the need for certain facilities to be near a main road and in the
future, the placement may be influenced by the rise of social media.
42
7.2 Appearance
The appearance matrix was modified from the original outlined by Knox (1976) with one notable difference. This was
the identification of different land uses that could be in an area, which Knox (1976) had not accounted for. Newstead
has a large variety of land uses and it was unreasonable to expect the same level of visual qualities from the industrial
and residential area. Due to this the appearance of factors such as gardens was not suitable for the Newstead audit
and was removed.
It is clearly evident that the appearance of Newstead various throughout with some areas holding a much higher
penalty (Map 30). In comparison to the zoning of the area, it can be seen that the residential areas hold a lower
penalty while the areas that are mostly industrial or mixed use show higher penalties. This shows a very consistent
pattern between the land use of the area and the appearance of the area according to the adjusted matrix. The
highest contributing factor is for non-conforming land uses particularly in points 7-10. These areas were mixed
between both residential and mixed use zones, the lowest penalties were in the townscape category. Points were 2,
8, 9 and 12 were of the highest penalty areas in the suburb, each of these can be found within two particular areas
(Map 30). The matrix shows that these areas are classed as B, which is understood as areas with some discordance
or drabness within the hard elements. This indicates that the presence of hard elements in these areas is
necessary.
The cross section map and graphs for this area show the disparity between the points on the same line. In comparing
the cross sections, it shows almost an opposite relationship between cross section AB and cross section CD. When
comparing the locations of the cross sections to the zoning, clear links to the appearance of Newstead are seen. In
cross section AB, audit points 1, 4 and 11 run through an area that is predominantly residential with slight infiltration
from industrial uses. This residential use surrounded by industrial zoning indicates that provision for appearance
characteristics of the area would be of higher importance to support the quality of life of these residents.
Furthermore, in cross section AB, audit point 8 is located in an area made of predominantly industrial or low-density
residential areas. This section is not used as often by pedestrians or residents of the area, therefore provision for
appearance characteristics of the area are not highly regarded, hence the spike in the AB cross section graph in (Map
30). Conversely, cross section CD passes through high industrial use zones in the northern section of the suburb,
resulting in lower provision for appearance features of the built environment. As can be seen, audit points 3 and 12
are located within these industrial zones and it is for this reason that the penalty points added to these sections are
higher than any other area. Furthermore, towards the southern end of the CD cross section, around audit points 11
and 7, the predominant land-use changes from industrial to mixed-use and residential zones. This change in zoning
indicates that appearance characteristics would have become more important in these zones, and have been
effectively allowed for through planning provision, resulting in lower penalty scores.
43
Map 30: Appearance Audit Points and Cross Sections (google, 2015; Brown, 2015)
There is a significant relationship between the zoning of Newstead and the appearance. Industrial zones do not place
priority on the appearance of the area, therefore the penalty points are higher for these areas due to a lack of provision
for gardens, landscaping and etc. Furthermore, areas commonly used by residents are more important in terms of visual
quality as they improve the visual amenity for the population.
7.3 Amenity
The amenity matrix also underwent changes to be more appropriate for Newstead. These amendments were in the noise
section and the addition of the flood risk (Appendix D). The noise section did not account for the types of uses within
Newstead and therefore, it was amended to include these factors such as, the normal noise from an industrial area as
compared to a residential area. Hence these two zones should not be compared relative to each other and are now on a
separate scale.
The Newstead area shows clear areas with high and low amenity (FIGURE ??). The areas with the highest penalties are
close to main roads as the three areas of the matrix are traffic, noise and air pollution. Furthermore, comparing this to
the zoning (map 31), the two points with the least penalties are located near green spaces and the moderate areas are
location mostly within the mixed use or residential areas.
The categories which provided Newstead with the highest penalty points were traffic, noise and flood risk, although not
all points have high penalties. For traffic and noise in particular, the poor scoring areas were all located on or around
major roads. The perimeter of Newstead is heavily impacted by noise and its related pollution (Map, 32). These issues
can impact the health and quality of life in Newstead as noise can impede on business and trading as well as lifestyle.
Flood risk was also highly penalised, which is not surprising as many inner Brisbane suburbs are prone to flooding, due to
their proximity to the Brisbane River, which was evident in the 2011 floods. The lowest penalised category was
microclimate, where the only high penalty for this was point 10 (Gasworks Plaza). This was due to the large undercover
44
Map 3231: Amenity Audit Points and Cross Section (Google, 2015; Brown, 2015)
area, which has created a wind tunnel, which was experienced firsthand during the Behavioural Analysis investigation.
It was revealed that point 3 was the lowest penalised area as it is a low impact industry zone.
The cross section has shown how the penalty points have been distributed throughout the suburb. It shows that there
is a gradual increase and decrease in the penalty distribution in the AB cross section whilst cross section CD contains
drastic increases and decreases in penalty points. The main causes for these varied amenity scores are related, in part,
to the locations of the audit points within the suburb and the various uses surrounding these points. Areas along cross
section AB that saw significant traffic, such as audit points 1 and 8, resulted in higher penalty points. These audit points
were located in close proximity to the Newstead boundary causing this increase.
Similarly, noise, air pollution and microclimate factors are increased in these areas due to the larger instance of traffic,
resulting in higher penalties for these features. This can also be seen in cross section CD which highlights the impact
the main road has on the suburb of Newstead. Audit points 12 and 7 are located on two of the busiest streets in
Newstead and therefore experience the same penalty point losses as audit points 1 and 8 in the AB cross section.
Furthermore, penalty points are awarded for the threat of flooding to the area.
Newstead faces significant threat from flooding due to its proximity to the Brisbane River and Breakfast Creek. Audit
points such as 1, 4, 11 and 7 can be easily flooded in high tide or king tide events, therefore the threat to those areas
needs to be considered in the environmental quality of the area.
7.4 Access
The access matrix used was the original created by Knox as it addressed all necessary factors of the Newstead area.
Overall access had the most percentage of penalties out of the four areas within the index. The only point which did
not have an excessive penalty was point 5 as its proximity to a primary school and park with a playground. The high
penalties are attributed to primary schools and childrens playgrounds and their lack of access, as there are no primary
schools in Newstead and very limited playgrounds. Due to this, in hindsight the areas could have been left out of the
matrix used but are also indicators of the demographics of the area, where Newstead has few families living in the
area that could contribute. The two categories not overly penalised in the access area were public transportation and
facilities. These factors represent the suburb well due to its inner city nature where adequate transportation and
facilities is necessary and it was observed that these were spread throughout the suburb.
The cross sectional map (Map 32) indicates that the penalty points awarded to most areas of Newstead were
approximately equal. Whilst the access to public transport within Newstead was remarkable, the cross section AB
shows that none of the audit points were located in close proximity to a playground or school. Furthermore, cross
section CD highlighted a similar relationship. The improved access to transport and open space was unable to offset
the lack of access to other factors.
7.5 Provision
According to Knox (1976), provision within a city is an important feature of the landscape and it is these features which
often redeem an Environmental Audit score for inner city suburbs. Newstead is a densely populated urban
environment in which provision is rarely made for environmentally sustainable practices. Provision relates to the
establishment of neighbourhood amenities that improve the quality of life for residents within the area. Within Knoxs
index, provision includes the implementation of adequate parking facilities, gardens and communal space, and
neighbourhood amenities such as street lighting and bus shelters.
After conducting the Environmental Audit within Newstead, it was found that parking provision was relatively mixed
throughout the suburb. In some areas parking was not adequate, resulting in a majority of on-street parking. This lack
of garaging facilities and surplus of on-street parking can cause traffic congestion as the road accommodates for
parked cars instead of flow. This lack of provision was not significant in other areas such as the area containing the
Gasworks Plaza. Here there was limited on-street parking available and maximised provision of garaging facilities. The
reasons for this could include the encouragement of using the area and the location of the plaza on a main road which
Map 33: Access Audit Points and Cross Section (Google, 2015; Brown, 2015)
45
makes the flow of traffic necessary. Based on the audit it is clear that the planning intent was to ensure congestion in
the area would not become an issue and resulted in the audit score for parking being relatively mixed.
Gardens and communal space was also a consideration within the audit. The master planners considering the
redevelopment of Newstead as a suburb were planning for the area at a time when neighbourhood design was becoming
less about fitting everything into the space and more about making the space functional as well as beautiful. Due to this,
Newstead has more than adequate communal green space and the upmarket price of housing indicates that residents
can afford to create well-kept garden spaces.
Finally, the provision of neighbourhood amenities such as bus shelters and street lighting. These factors were examined
within the Behavioural Analysis and it is evident that these amenities are within good provision. In order to complete
this section of the audit, the index created by Knox (1976) was amended as it mentioned the provision of post boxes and
telephone kiosks which are no longer prominent amenities for the time period. Therefore, they are not often found
within the urban environment and the inclusion of these features was not necessary for the environmental quality of
the area.
The provision factors within Newstead were sufficient, with a total score of 6.25 out of a possible 13. This score was a
major contributor to the overall environmental quality of Newstead. The strategies that were utilised within the suburb
served to increase its provision for neighbourhood amenities which is evident as some audit locations scored better than
others (Map 34). These areas are located around the center of the suburb, near the cultural hub of Newstead.
After examining the cross sections (Map 34) it is obvious that provision within Newstead is relatively well catered for in
the southern areas of the suburb, whilst the northern region contains very little consideration. The AB cross section runs
from the north border of Newstead, to the southern end and based on the zoning of the area (Map 2) this cross section
passes through many different uses of the suburb. The land surrounding audit points 1, 2 and 4 is mainly industrial with
very few residential apartments. For this reason, consideration for provision aspects of the built environment, including
garaging facilities, neighbourhood amenities and well-kept garden space, is not highly valued. However, as the cross
section moves further south through the suburb, crossing into mixed-use and residential areas, there is a greater
emphasis on providing these facilities for the use of the population. It was the planners understanding that provision
facilities would not be widely required within the industrial use areas of the suburb, and therefore were not provided
for. This resulted in the higher penalty scores seen in the graphs in map thirty-four.
A similar situation can be seen in the CD cross section that runs from the north-west to south-east regions of Newstead.
This cross section again confirms what the AB graph indicates the areas that are unused by the public are not well
provided for. Similarly, those areas that are used extensively such as point 11 hold greater considerations for provision
due to its increased use. This is reflected in the penalty scores, with point 11 obtaining the lowest number of penalty
points.
From these graphs it can be seen that provision scores for the suburb as a whole are adequate. In areas where
neighbourhood amenities are more important, such as residential and mixed use zones, provision is well catered for and
requires little improvement. Industrial and low-density residential areas do not require as much consideration for
provision of neighbourhood amenities and therefore the lack of facilities in these areas is acceptable. Provision should
be considered throughout all areas of the suburb to ensure residents, visitors to the area and all vehicles are provided
with adequate facilities to support their quality of life. According to Knox (1976), provision within a city is an important
feature of the landscape as it is these features which often redeem an Environmental Audit score for large inner city
suburbs. Newstead is a densely populated
7.6 Flooding
Newstead is located along the banks of the Brisbane River, with Breakfast Creek running along the North boundary of
the suburb. Considering the history of Brisbane and its propensity for floods, being surrounded by water in this way Map 34: Provision Audit Points and Cross Section (Google, 2015; Brown, 2015)
makes Newstead extremely susceptible to flooding in many areas of the suburb. Knoxs index (1976) does not specifically
46
list flooding as an issue for Environmental Auditing, however the investigation concluded that it was necessary to include
this feature due to the history of the area and the fact that it has flooded several times in the last 100 years.
Table 3: Flooding Environmental Audit scores
Flood Risk Max penalty points
8
Points
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Sum Average
4 6 0 6 0 5 7 3 5 3 3 2
39
3.67
The areas identified as serious flood risks (map 35) are correlated with their location in proximity to the river and their
elevation levels. Based on past events it is obvious from this map that flooding is a serious concern within Newstead,
specifically the Northern half of the Suburb where Breakfast Creek meets the main part of the river (BCC, 2014).
Furthermore, past events such as the 1974 floods and the more recent 2011 floods saw record high tides that inundated
most of Newstead.
The issues that flooding can cause such as soil contamination and sewerage leaks can drastically detract from the
environmental quality of an area. These issues may serve to reduce the overall environmental quality of the area and,
by extension, the quality of life of residents. It was for these reasons that the investigation led to an addition being made
to Knoxs index (1976). Table four describes the additional levels of environmental assessment that were added and the
maximum penalty points that may have been allowed within each audit location.
Table 4: Flooding Environmental Audit Index Section
Amenity
Flood
Risk
A
B
C
D
Penalty
Points
0
13
46
68
This assessment of flood risk was added to the amenity section of the index as it fit well with the accompanying
assessment items in that section including air pollution and microclimate, all environmental pollution factors that serve
to reduce the quality of life to residents.
During the site investigation, the 12 points that were examined for their potential flood risk found that the area as a
whole holds a relatively high threat from flooding. Using the maps identified earlier (map 30 to 34), each point was
examined in relation to its location within each map to determine the threat it faces from flooding. Areas that would be
significantly inundated with water from floods were given 8 penalty points, those that might find themselves cut off from
the remainder of the suburb due to flooding received scores around 5 or 6 and those that suffered no risk from flooding
were given a score around 1 or 2. As can be seen from the excerpt from the Environmental Audit in table three, there
was a wide range of scores throughout the audit points based on the fact that they were arranged widely over the whole
suburb. Some were located within the area of high flood risk and others were located within the southern area of
Newstead where flooding and high tides do not affect any of the residents.
The average score after all of the site investigations was 3.67 indicating that Newstead, whilst not a highly threatened
area, has the potential to be negatively impacted by flooding whether from being cut off from surrounding areas or
through direct threat from inundation.
Map 35: Brisbane River Flooding Map (BCC, 2014; Brown, 2015)
47
7.7 Conclusion
The Environmental Quality Audit was conducted to determine whether the urban environment in Newstead influenced the
environmental quality and therefore the quality of life for residents. The audit was undertaken using a tailored version of
Knoxs 1976 Index which determined that Newstead is has adequate appearance, access and provision qualities but access
could be significantly improved. This was due to the limited green space and schools and the public facilities being just
below average. Newstead could improve its scores in all elements of the audit in order to improve the quality of life for its
residents, but is currently sufficient based on the standards produced by Knox in 1976.
48
8.0 Limitations
8.1 Photographic Essay
Krieger (2001) makes strong connections between planning and the value of photographs. However, this
type of analysis has many limitations. Any sort of photograph is open to these limitations (Dennis Jr. et al,
2009; Krieger, 2004) and a photograph used for analysis can cause boundaries in the study.
The main limitation is the difficulty in obtaining useful photos. Johnson et al. (2006) discusses the role of
weather and the way in which it can obscure results, while Fink (2011) discusses the way in which a
photograph can portray areas in a certain light. This light, which was found from the current study, is not
always the truth of the situation in an area (Wagner, 2004), or the photographer can force the photo to
represent something in a certain way (the same way social media can) (Krieger, 2001). Along with this, it
was found that pictures are rather good at depicting the landscape of an area but not necessarily its quality
and uses.
In addition to these factors is also the issue of legible photos. Unfortunately, the team did not possess any
professional photography equipment or training. Due to this, photos often turned out unclear or incorrect
due to factors such as lighting (natural and artificial) or positioning. It was found that occasionally photos
did not see the same scope as a human eye, and the photographer was only able to capture certain aspects
of an area, rather than the whole idea.
Due to many of these issues, the team was forced into a lengthy photography process. There were multiple
visits to the sight to obtain photographs needed or retake those that were unclear or incorrect. This required
a long period of examination of each and every photograph. This could have been slightly less likely if the
team had longer to study the area and the best areas to portray in imagery.
49
Analysis section of this investigation. One key limitation is based on the fact that the suburbs of Newstead
and Teneriffe have been analysed in conjunction with one another. In 1975, Teneriffe and Newstead were
amalgamated, creating the large suburb locality that is known today (Centre for the Government of
Queensland, 2015). However, in 2010 Teneriffe split from its neighbouring suburb. This split should have
resulted in Teneriffe and Newstead being considered as separate suburbs within this investigation.
However, after research and analysis into available census data, it was found that Teneriffe is still considered
in the locality of Newstead in the most recent census statistics. Furthermore, mapping software such as
Google maps and Google earth that were used in this investigation do not recognise Teneriffe as a bounded
suburb and is instead contained within the borders of Newstead. It is for these reasons that the investigation
chose to include Teneriffe within the analysis of Newstead, in order to provide accurate data and mapping
information for the suburb as a whole. This analysis was a very lengthy process due to the number of
characteristics, facilities and amenities in the area. The analysis period could have been significantly
shortened with the exclusion of some unnecessary characteristics. Furthermore, Patterson (2007) explains
the necessity of fast internet access throughout the process, one thing which is lacking in schools and
universities. Unfortunately, this meant that the team was not always able to work effectively on the analysis.
Another limitation of the Spatial Analysis for this study was the utilisation of Google Earth as the software
to complete this section; this held many limitations in comparison to a GIS based software such as ArcGIS.
Unfortunately, different mapping softwares provide the user with different data. For example, the team
utilised Google Earth and attempted to consort software such as Google Maps for more information (mainly
due to the unavailability of data without an account on Google Earth) but Google Maps data often
contradicted information already provided by Google Earth. Not only this but the team was unable to access
all information possible as the system requires an account (which the team did not have access to) in order
to be provided with these services.
Furthermore, it is possible that the information used throughout this section may not be an accurate
representation of the area. This is of significant relevance to the suburb of Newstead due to the continuous
and current heavy construction in the area. Patterson (2007) also explains that while it is an effective tool
for spatially analysing areas of the world, it is slightly outdated. This could contribute to the data
contradictions between different softwares and also reiterates that fact that GIS based softwares are
preferred. The software programs are constantly updated by GIS analysts around the world and provide
users with correct information where possible.
50
New development in Newstead is starting to see its share of interest from award winning architects and
artists. This can be seen in one of the newest developments in the area, Newstead Series. Which has gained
the attention of 3 award-winning artists, who have been commissioned by the developer to create both
pieces of art as well as build art installations within the structure of the building (Maher, 2015).
Newstead is one of many flood prone suburbs in Brisbane. Because of the affluence evident in Newstead,
the question could Newstead afford to flood arose. Or rather would Newstead have more flood resilience
due to the collective wealth of the suburbs local population. As there is a lack of research and scientific
sources related to the justification of this question; the best answer can be found by comparing the median
weekly household income of the suburb to another Brisbane suburb prone to flooding. The suburb chosen
was West End with a median weekly household income of $1,485 (ABS, 2011). Comparing this to Newsteads
median weekly household income of $2,472 shows a great disparity between the two suburbs. Although
given this difference it gives the conclusion that although no suburb could truly afford to flood, Newstead
would be more equipped to deal with flooding based on generated income.
Throughout this fieldwork investigation, all of the characteristics that a predominant features of Newstead,
were able to be analysed not just through data analysis, but also by getting feet on the ground to ensure
researched facts fit with real-life observations. It was found that for the most part, Newstead is every bit
the high-class, urban renewal suburb that has been described through census data and Newspaper articles.
However, the field investigations allowed for greater understanding of those characteristics, which are not
highly publicized by the media. We found that not only was Newstead a neighbourhood designed to cater
to a more affluent population, but also caters extensively to visitors to the neighbourhood through the
numerous entertainment and eating facilities spread throughout the suburb. Newstead can be a welcoming
area not just for prospective buyers, but also to individuals just wishing to enjoy the area itself. Newstead
offers many attractions that can be enjoyed by members of the general public including the historical
Newstead house, the many parks and community spaces or the varied access to the Brisbane River.
This investigation has provided greater insight into the benefits and difficulties related to field research and
how it can be applied and compared to planning practices within Brisbane Suburbs. The choice of Newstead
as the subject of this investigation was due, in part, to a small amount of prior knowledge of the area and
how it operates. Furthermore, its rising popularity in recent years and the numerous construction works
that were observed throughout the suburb as a whole serves to prove that this area will only grow in
importance in future years. The photograph analysis, behavioural analysis, spatial analysis and
environmental audit were all tools used to assess the area and examine its importance within Brisbane as a
whole. From these, a complete image of Newstead could be constructed to determine future planning
possibilities for the area.
References
A.P. Eagers Limited. (2015a). Driven Together Timeline. Retrieved 26th September, 2015 from
http://www.apeagers.com.au/100-years/timeline/
Centre for the Government of Queensland. (2015). Teneriffe. Retrieved 4th October, 2015 from
http://queenslandplaces.com.au/teneriffe
ABC News. (2009, May 6). Local History - Newstead. Retrieved 6th October, 2015 from
http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2006/07/21/1692886.html
Digital Atlas Pty. Ltd. (2015). Picture of Australia from 1928: Woolstore Building Teneriffe, Queensland, 1928.
Retrieved 28th September, 2015 from http://www.bonzle.com/pictures-over-time/pictures-taken-in1928/page-1/picture-zczlzu3q/size-4/new-farm/woolstore-building-teneriffe-brisbane-queensland-1928
Australian Bureau of Statistics [ABS]. (2011). 2011 Census QuickStats West End. Retrieved 30th October, 2015 from
http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/quickstat/305011607?opendoc
ument&navpos=220
Australian Bureau of Statistics [ABS]. (2013). 2011 Census QuickStats - Newstead. Retrieved 8th September, 2015
from
http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/quickstat/305011427?opendoc
ument&navpos=220
AVEO. (2015). Gasworks Plaza - Welcome. Retrieved October, 2015, from http://gasworksplaza.com.au/location/
Azapagic, A, Chalabi, Z., Fletcher, T., Grundy, C., Jones, M., Leonardi, G., Osammor, O., Sharifi, V., Swithenbank, J.,
Tiwary, A., & Vardoulakis, S. (2013). An Integrated Approach to Assessing the Environmental and Health
Impacts of Pollution in the Urban Environment: Methodology and a Case Study. Process Safety and
Environmental Protection, 91(6), 508-520. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2012.11.004
Bochenski, N. (2014, October 29). Brisbane musics Day of the Triffid. The Brisbane Times. Retrieved 18th October,
2015 from http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/brisbane-musics-day-of-the-triffid-2014102811d441.html
Brisbane City Council [BCC]. (1969). Newstead Brisbane Queensland History: Byres Street - Newstead. Retrieved 28th
September, 2015 from http://trove.nla.gove.au/work/167751676?q=Newstead&I-availability=y&Iformat=Photograph&I-decade=196&c=picture&versionId=182873197
Brisbane City Council [BCC]. (2014). Brisbane City Plan 2014. Retrieved 27th October, 2015 from
http://eplan.brisbane.qld.gov.au
Brisbane City Council [BCC]. (2015a). Heritage Register. Retrieved 16th September, 2015 from
http://heritage.brisbane.qld.gov.au/heritage_register/search.do;jsessionid=c0a8841130d7330a88260426462
581099b11aa19ad86.e34Pb30Sb30Qbi0Ta30MaxaQa3j0?action=search
Brisbane City Council [BCC]. (2015b). Newstead River Reach. Retrieved 2nd October, 2015 from
http://citycattour.com/chapter-a/landmarks/newstead-river-reach.html
Brisbane Kids. (2015). Scandinavian Festival - Newstead. Retrieved 20th October, 2015 from
http://www.brisbanekids.com.au/.../scandinavian-festival.../
Brkovic, M., & Sretovic, V. (2013). Harnessing Social Media for Planning: A Overview. 49th International Society of
City and Regional Planners [ISOCARP] Congress 2013. Retrieved 19th October, 2015 from
http://www.academia.edu/4797690/Harnessing_Social_Media_for_Urban_Planning_An_Overview
Brunsdon, C., Charlton, M., & Fotheringham, A. (2000). Quantitative Geography: Perspectives on Spatial Data
Analysis. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Double, K. (2014). Is Newstead the Hottest Suburb in Brisbane. Retrieved 14th September, 2015 from
https://www.mywealth.commbank.com.au/property/is-newstead-the-hottest-suburb-in-brisbane-hottopic201407
Duffy, C. (2015). Warehouse Living in Brisbane's Woolstore Precinct. Retrieved 8th September, 2015 from
http://www.domain.com.au/news/warehouse-living-in-brisbanes-woolstore-precinct-20150917gjp6j2/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=editorial&utm_campaign=ON&noshow=true
ESRI. (2015). ArcGIS Online. Retrieved 1st October, 2015 from
https://griffith.maps.arcgis.com/home/signin.html?returnUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fgriffith.maps.arcgis.com%2Fh
ome%2Fwebmap%2Fviewer.html%3FuseExisting%3D1
Eusuf, M., Mohit, M., Eusuf, M., & Ibrahim, M. (2014). Impact of Outdoor Environment to The Quality of Life.
Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 153(1), 639 654. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro/2014.10.096
Fanatic, F. (2009). Breakfast Creek Bridge. Retrieved 25th September, 2015 from
http://www.yourbrisbanepastandpresent.com/search/label/newstead
Fanatic, F. (2011). Australian American War Memorial, Newstead Park. Retrieved 25th September, 2015 from
http://www.yourbrisbanepastandpresent.com/search/label/newstead
Fanatic, F. (2013). Gasworks Plaza, Newstead. Retrieved 20th September, 2015 from
http://www.yourbrisbanepastandpresent.com/search/label/newstead
Fanatic, F. (2014). Brisbane's History in Photographs. Retrieved 25th September, 2015 from
http://www.yourbrisbanepastandpresent.com/search/label/newstead
Fanatic, F. (2015). Elder Smith Wool Store, Teneriffe. Retrieved 25th September, 2015 from
http://www.yourbrisbanepastandpresent.com/search/label/teneriffe
Feeney, K. (2013, August 28). Gasworks Retail, Dining and Entertainment Precinct Opens. The Brisbane Times.
Retrieved 20th September, 2015 from http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/gasworks-retail-diningand-entertainment-precinct-opens-20130828-2sqjj.html
Fink, J. (2012). Walking the Neighbourhood, Seeing the Small Details of Community Life: Reflections from a
Photography Walking Tour. Critical Social Policy, 32(1), 31-50. doi: 10.1177/0261018311425198
foodi. (2014). Newstead Food Night Safari - Brisbane. Retrieved 6th October, 2015 from
http://foodi.com.au/newstead-food-night-safari/
Google. (2015). Google Maps. Retrieved 18th October, 2015 from https://www.google.com.au/maps/@27.5488826,153.0534239,15z
Hacker, D. (2009). Booroodabin; A Sesquicentenary History of Breakfast Creek, Bowen Hills, Newstead and Tenerife
1823 2009. Brisbane, Australia: The Queensland Women's Historical Association Inc.
51
Homes with History. (2015). Roseville Publishing the Past. Retrieved 20th September, 2015 from
https://ggbooks.wordpress.com/tag/teneriffe/
Patterson, T. (2007). Google Earth as a (Not Just) Geography Education Tool. Journal of Geography, 106(4), 145-152.
doi: 10.1080/00221340701678032
International City Church. (2015). Our History. Retrieved 16th October, 2015 from
http://www.iccbrisbane.org/about-us/our-history/
Queensland Government. (2007). Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design: Guidelines for Queensland - Part
A: Essential Features of Safer Places. Retrieved 27th October, 2015 from
https://www.police.qld.gov.au/.../Documents/CPTEDPartA.pdf
Johnson, J. (2006). The Active Participant-Observer: Applying Social Role Analysis to Participant Observation. Field
Methods, 18(2), 111-134. doi: 10.1177/1525822X05285928
King, S. (2015). From The Ground Up - Boral's First 50 Years - Foreword. Retrieved 18th October, 2015 from
http://www.boral.com.au/history/Foreword.html
Knox, P. (1976). Fieldwork in Urban Geography: Assessing Environmental Quality. Scottish Geographical Magazine,
92(2), 101-107. doi: 10.1080/00369227608736336
Krieger. (2004). Taking Pictures in The City. Journal of Planning Education & Research, 24(2), 213-215. doi:
10.1177/0739456X04271625
Lefer, T., Anderson, M., Fornari, A., Lambert, A., Fletcher, J., & Baquero, M. (2008). Using Google Earth as an
Innovative Tool for Community Mapping. Public Health Reports, 123(4), 474-480. Retrieved 20th August, 2015
from http://www-ncbi-nlm-nihgov.libraryproxy.griffith.edu.au/pmc/articles/PMC2430643/pdf/phr123000474.pdf
Queensland Government. (2015). Newstead Search. Retrieved 26th September, 2015 from
http://www.archivessearch.qld.gov.au/CorpError.aspx?aspxerrorpath=/Image/ImageSearchResults.aspx
Queensland State Archives. (1926). Brisbane River Looking from Newstead Park, Breakfast Creek Road, Newstead
Towards New Farm, Brisbane, October 1926 [Catalog No. 193305701]. Retrieved 29th September, 2015 from
http://trive.nla.gov.au/work/177531344?q&versionId=19330571
Quest Newspapers. (2014, April 23). Anzac Day Services to Be Held Right Across Brisbane. The Courier Mail.
http://www.couriermail.com.au/questnews/north/anzac-day-services-to-be-held-right-across-brisbane/storyfni9r1kg-1226893155924
Spiel, S. (2014, April 30). Teneriffe Woolstores - Past & Present [Blog post]. Retrieved 6th October, 2015 from
http://simonspiel/wordpress.com/2014/04/30/teneriffe-woolstores-past-present
Spirit Hotel Group. (2013). The Waterloo - Our History. Retrieved 28th October, 2015 from
http://www.waterloohotel.com.au/History.aspx
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press.
th
Maher, S. (2015, July 30). Newstead series merges the worlds of architecture and art. Retrieved 30 October, 2015
from http://theweekendedition.com.au/design/newstead-series/
th
National Library of Australia. (2015). Pictures, Photos, Objects - Newstead. Retrieved 29 September, 2015 from
http://trove.nla.gov.au/picture/result?q=Newstead&l-availability=y&l-format=Photograph&l-decade=196
th
National Library of Australia. (2015). The Brisbane Courier (Qld.: 1864-1933). Retrieved 8 October, 2015 from
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/21688569
Suez-Environment. (2015). Teneriffe Festival 2015. Retrieved 18th October, 2015 from
http://www.teneriffefestival.org/the-festival/
The Triffid. (2015). About Us - The Story of the Triffid. Retrieved 6th October, 2015 from
http://thetriffid.com.au/about-us/
TRANSLink. (2015). All Bus Timetables. Retrieved 8th October, 2015, from http://jp.translink.com.au/travelinformation/network-information/buses/all-timetables
van de Ven, A. (2008). Photographing people is wrong. City, 12(3), 383-390. doi: 10.1080/13604810802594338
New Farm & Districts Historical Society. (2013). Teneriffe History. Retrieved 13th October, 2015 from
http://newfarmhistorical.squarespace.com/articles/teneriffe-history.html
Newstead House. (2015). Newstead House - History. Retrieved 2nd October, 2015 from
http://newsteadhouse.com.au/history/
Wagner, J. (2004). Constructing Credible Images: Documentary Studies, Social Research, and Visual Studies.
American Behavioral Scientist, 47(12), 1477-1506. doi: 10.1177/0002764204266235
WalkScore. (2015). Walk Score - Living in Newstead Brisbane. Retrieved 25th October, 2015 from
https://www.walkscore.com/AU-QLD/Brisbane/Newstead
Additional Reading
Balram, S., & Dragievi, S. (2005). Attitudes Toward Urban Green Spaces: Integrating Questionnaire Survey and
Collaborative GIS Techniques to Improve Attitude Measurements. Landscape and Urban Planning, 71(2-4),
147-162. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.02.007
Dennis, S., Gaulocher, S., Carpiano, R., & Brown, D. (2009). Participatory Photo Mapping (PPM): Exploring an
Integrated Method for Health and Place Research with Young People. Health & Place, 15(2), 466-473. doi:
10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.08.004
52
Friedmann, J. (2002). The Good City: In Defense of Utopian Thinking. In J. Friedmann (Ed.), The Prospect of Cities.
London, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Lang, J. (1991). Design Theory from an Environment and Behaviour Perspective. London, New York: Plenum.
Appendix
Appendix A Site Visit Notes and Corresponding Maps
53
54
55
Chester Street
Weekday
A Thursday at 6:00am
Kids = 1
Smokers = 3
Fitness persons = 23
Cyclists = 5
A Friday at 12:00pm
A Thursday at 8:30pm
Weekend
A Sunday at 6:00am
56
No kids seen
Seems to get busy when trading hours of surrounding
stores are open
Direction is mainly towards bakery
A lot of car traffic some pedestrians but barely any
Mostly individuals but pairs heading to bakery
A Sunday at 12:00pm
A Saturday at 7:00pm
Bakery busy
No through pedestrians
Casual/smart dressed
Most road traffic was to park for bakery
Mostly young people
Some older
Lots of couples or groups
Florence Street
Weekday
A Friday at 6:00am and 7:00am (two hours due to lack of activity to
observe)
A Tuesday at 11:30am
Very quiet
No one seen exercising
A few of the restaurants open but minimal traffic
attracted
Lots of car traffic busy street but not much pedestrians
Most traffic is on Macquarie
Starting to get busy at around 12:20pm
Mostly pairs
Middle aged persons mostly no kids or smokers
A Tuesday at 7:00pm
Not busy
Very little pedestrians
One restaurant was busier than the other main
congregation point
Mostly couples
No children
Lots of cars along Macquarie
Weekend
A Sunday at 7:00am
A Sunday at 12:00pm
A Sunday at 6:00pm
Gasworks Plaza
Weekday
A Thursday at 6:00am
Mainly corporate
A Wednesday at 11:30am
A Wednesday at 7:00pm
Weekend
A Sunday at 6:00am
Very quiet
Mostly people exercising
Some store workers using as a commuting area
A Saturday at 12:00pm
Busiest time
People using all stores and services
Families, groups, couples, singles no dominant
People travelling individually were in their middle ages
Gas well was used as a thoroughfare and to sit, skate
board, ride bikes etc.
Wide range of ethnicities
A Saturday at 7:00pm
Stratton Street
Weekday
A Tuesday at 6:00am
A Tuesday at 12:00pm
57
A Thursday at 7:00pm
No children seen
Lots of smokers
Minimal activity near Triffid but lots of people
congregating
Area is passive and quiet
Minimal car traffic on Commercial Road but lots of
pedestrian
Barely any traffic at all seen on Ann Street
Main area was near Waterloo
Weekend
A Saturday at 6:00am
VERY QUIET
Some people going to the gym, but only a handful
A Saturday at 12:00pm
A Saturday at 7:00pm
A Wednesday at 12:00pm
A Thursday at 7:00pm
Fitness persons = 21
Cyclists = 22
Casually dressed person = 20
Business dressed persons = 8
Kids = 2
Dogs = 2
Smokers = 1
Mostly singles, very few groups and if so usually no
more than two
One family (one male and one female parent) with 2
kids
Six people hopped onto the ferry at 7:10pm, none
hopped off
Few people, if any, in Eves on the River - restaurant
Place is comprised on mostly apartments and
boardwalk/Riverwalk and ferry terminal
Most apartments had lights on
Three people hopped onto the 7:15 ferry, one hopped
off
Too many people to count hopped onto the 8:10 ferry ad
three hopped off
A fairly even direction along the Riverwalk but most,
some coming from eves laneway bit (Vernon terrace), lots
coming from Skyring Terrace/Commercial Road
Weekend
A Saturday at 6:00am
A Sunday at 12:00pm
A Sunday at 6:30pm
Quiet
Not much use of public transport
Some people exercising
TUESDAY
PM AM DAY
PM
WEDNESDAY
AM
GASWORKS
TENERIFFE FERRY
THURSDAY
DAY
PM
AM
Cav, Kori
DAY
PM
FRIDAY
AM
DAY
SATURDAY
PM
AM
DAY
PM
Olivia Olivia
Olivia, Cav
FLORENCE STREET
SUNDAY
AM
Cav
Olivia
Olivia
Cav
MONDAY
AM DAY
TUESDAY
PM AM DAY
Olivia Nathan
PM
WEDNESDAY
AM
DAY
PM
AM
Cav
Cav
THURSDAY
DAY
PM
DAY
Nathan
Olivia
Kori
FRIDAY
AM
PM
Olivia
Olivia
STRATTON STREET
DAY
SATURDAY
PM
AM
DAY
PM
SUNDAY
AM
DAY
PM
GASWORKS
TENERIFFE FERRY
Mel
FLORENCE STREET
Mel
Nathan
Mel
STRATTON STREET
Olivia
Appendix C Knoxs 1976 Index Schedule for the Assessment of Environmental Quality
Knoxs Index
Element
Appearance
A
Exclusively residential uses fully separated from other use zones
B
Limited Infiltration, or local preference of, non-conforming uses
C
Some substantial infiltration of, or local dominance by, non-conforming uses
D
Excessive infiltration of, or local dominance by, non-conforming uses
Landscaping/Visual Quality
A
Mature, good quality trees; constructively located and well-kept grassed spaces
B
Insufficient poor quality trees/defectively located, and/or unkempt grassed spaces
C
Total, or almost total, lack of trees/grassed spaces
Note: The incidence and visual quality of gardens is considered separately
Townscape/Visual quality
A
Harmonious, attractive arrangement of hard elements (within and seen from the study zone)
B
Some discordance or drabness within the hard elements
C
Excessive discordance or drabness within the hard elements
Appearance of gardens/yards
A
Predominance of tidy/well screened gardens and/or yards within the study zone where appropriate
Non-Conforming uses (within or nearby)
e.g. Industry
58
Penalty Points
0
12
37
89
01
25
67
0
13
45
0
B
C
Access to Primary School
Traffic
Noise
Air Pollution
Microclimate
Garaging/Parking provision
Garden provision
59
A
B
C
D
E
F
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
1
2
0
1
2
4
5
7
0
1
1
2
4
5
5
6
0
2
3
5
6
0
1
2
4
4
0
2
5
0
12
38
9 11
0
12
37
89
01
25
68
0
12
34
0
1
2
4
6
0
12
C
Excessive lack of gardens or communal/incidental open space
Provision of neighbourhood amenities
A
Full provision of all neighbourhood amenities
B
Insufficient provision of neighbourhood amenities, i.e. some amenities absent
C
Total or almost total lack of all neighbourhood amenities
Note: Amenities include street lighting, telephone kiosks, post-boxes and bus shelters
34
0
12
3
Element
Appearance
Non-Conforming uses (within or nearby) A Exclusively residential uses fully separated from other use zones
e.g. Industry
B Limited Infiltration, or local preference of, non-conforming uses
C Some substantial infiltration of, or local dominance by, non-conforming uses
D Excessive infiltration of, or local dominance by, non-conforming uses
Landscaping/Visual Quality
A Mature, good quality trees; constructively located and well-kept grassed spaces
B Insufficient poor quality trees/defectively located, and/or unkempt grassed spaces
C Total, or almost total, lack of trees/grassed spaces
Note: The incidence and visual quality of gardens is considered separately
Townscape/Visual quality
A Harmonious, attractive arrangement of hard elements (within and seen from the study zone)
B Some discordance or drabness within the hard elements
C Excessive discordance or drabness within the hard elements
Access
Access to Primary School
A Primary School within 5 minutes walking distance and involving no main road crossing(s)
B Primary school within 5 minutes walking distance but involving main road crossing(s)
C Primary school 5 10 minutes walking distance but involving no main road crossing(s)
D Primary school 5 10 minutes walking distance but involving main road crossing(s)
E Primary school more than 10 minutes walking distance but involving no main road crossing(s)
F Primary school more than 10 minutes walking distance and involving main road crossing(s)
Access to other facilities
A Shops, public house and doctor all within 5 minutes walking distance
B Shops and doctor within 5 minutes walking distance
C Shops and public house within 5 minutes walking distance
D Shops only within 5 minutes walking distance
E Public house and doctor within 5 minutes walking distance
F Doctor only within 5 minutes walking distance
G Public house only within 5 minutes walking distance
H No facilities within 5 minutes walking distance
Access to childrens playground
A Playground within 2 minutes walking distance and involving no main road crossing(s)
B Playground within 2 minutes walking distance but involving main road crossing(s)
C Playground 2 4 minutes walking distance but involving no main road crossing(s)
D Playground 2 4 minutes walking distance but involving main road crossing(s)
E No Playground within 4 minutes walking distance
Access to park/public open space
A Park/P.O.S. within 5 minutes walking distance and involving no main road crossing(s)
B Park/P.O.S within 5 minutes walking distance but involving main road crossing(s)
C Park/P.O.S 5 10 minutes walking distance but involving no main road crossing(s)
D Park/P.O.S 5 10 minutes walking distance but involving main road crossing(s)
E No Park/P.O.S within 10 minutes walking distance
Access to public transportation
A Public transport route within 3 minutes walking distance
B Public transport route 3 5 minutes walking distance
C No public transport route within 5 minutes walking distance
Amenity
Traffic
A Full separation of pedestrian and normal residential traffic
B Very limited intrusion of through traffic/no intrusion of traffic of unsuitable character
C Some substantial intrusion of through traffic of unsuitable character
60
Penalty Points
0
12
37
89
01
25
67
0
13
45
0
1
2
4
5
7
0
1
1
2
4
5
5
6
0
2
3
5
6
0
1
2
4
4
0
2
5
0
12
38
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
D
9 11
0
12
37
89
01
25
68
0
12
34
0
13
46
68
0
1
2
4
6
0
12
34
0
12
3
61
Max Penalties
Point 1
Point 2
Point 3
Point 4
Point 5
Point 6
Point 7
Point 8
Point 9
Point 10
Point 11
Point 12
Sum
Average
9
7
5
2
0
2
4
1
6
3
10
5
2
2
9
4
0
1
5
0
4
0
4
0
1
1
2
8
1
0
9
8
6
4
18
8
6
4
18
9
0
0
9
2
1
2
5
3
4
3
10
45
26
17
88
4.5
2.6
1.7
8.8
11
9
8
4
8
6
6
1
0
4
17
0
7
3
2
6
18
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
6
0
4
0
0
0
4
6
2
2
0
5
15
6
3
3
1
13
8
6
4
0
3
21
9
6
4
2
5
26
0
4
4
3
3
14
0
0
4
0
3
7
10
6
5
2
2
25
36
38
21
8
32
135
3.6
3.8
2.1
0.8
3.6
13.5
7
2
6
0
1
16
7
4
6
0
0
17
7
6
0
0
1
14
7
2
6
1
3
19
0
2
0
0
0
2
7
6
6
4
0
23
7
0
6
1
0
14
7
0
6
5
0
18
7
1
6
5
0
19
7
0
6
1
0
14
7
0
6
0
0
13
7
5
6
5
0
23
63
23
48
17
5
156
6.3
2.3
4.8
1.7
0.5
15.6
7
6
6
5
5
Provision
Parking
Gardens
Neighbourhood amenities
Provision Total
Grand Total
62
6
4
3
6
0
1
7
6
4
2
12
6
1
0
7
5
4
2
11
2
0
1
3
4
2
2
8
4
2
0
6
1
3
0
4
1
3
0
4
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
3
4
3
2
9
44
57
31
41
13
48
42
61
67
38
28
67
36
19
8
63
3.6
1.9
0.8
6.3
44.2