Art Critique Rubric

Criteria1
Dialoging
and
Feedback

Criteria2
Useof
Academi
c
Language

Not Yet
(Partial)

Approaches
(Moderate)

Meets
(Strong)
Performance
Criteria

Advanced
(Distinguished)

Students ability to
demonstrate critique
norms when dialoguing
with others about their
own work is lacking or
inconsistent. Student
inconsistently
incorporated or did not
consider feedback they
received about their work
in order to strengthen the
final product.

Student has demonstrated

consistent but minimal
demonstration of critique
norms when dialoguing with
others about their work.
Student has minimally
incorporated feedback they
receive about their work to
strengthen the final product.

Students will
document, critique,
and use reflective
strategies to give,
receive, and apply
feedback about their
progress in order to
refine their work.

Student has demonstrated

strong maturity and in-depth
reflection when dialoguing
with others about their work.
Student incorporated
feedback they received about
their work, as well as
additional self-directed
process sketches and
research, to strengthen the
final product.

Student incorporated little

to no academic language
in group discussions and
written statements when
critiquing and reflecting
upon their work. Student
demonstrated little
understanding of
vocabulary terms or
definitions.

Student incorporated some

use of academic language in
group discussions and
written statements when
critiquing and reflecting upon
their work. Student
participated somewhat in the
group critiques. Students
written reflections
demonstrated emerging
understanding of the art
making process.

Student incorporated
academic language in
group discussions and
written statements
when critiquing and
reflecting upon their
work.

Student demonstrated a
mature understanding of
academic language through
group discussions and written
statements when critiquing
and reflecting upon their
work. Student communicated
complex ideas both verbally
and in written form.