Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s12665-009-0087-4
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Received: 4 March 2008 / Accepted: 31 January 2009 / Published online: 20 February 2009
Springer-Verlag 2009
C. Bhuiyan
School of Environmental Studies, University of Delhi,
Delhi 110 007, India
R. P. Singh (&)
Department of Physics, Computational Science and Engineering,
Chapman University, Hashinger, One University Drive,
Orange, CA 92866, USA
e-mail: rsingh@chapman.edu
C. Bhuiyan W. A. Flugel
Friedrich Schiller University, 07743 Jena, Germany
Introduction
Ground water is a renewable resource subjected to periodic
replenishment primarily through precipitation. Recharge is
one of the key hydrological parameters for assessment,
budgeting, management, and modelling of ground water
resources. Although information and data regarding recharge
rate is vital for recharge assessment of any region, determination of this parameter is neither easy nor straightforward.
Various conventional techniques such as heat tracer test
(Stallman 1964; Lapham 1989; Constanz et al. 1994;
Ronan et al. 1998), active (Athavale and Rangarajan 1988;
Sharma 1989) and passive (Philips et al. 1988; Scanlon
1992; Cook et al. 1994) isotopic tracer tests, chloride balance technique (Eriksson and Khunakasem 1969; Sukhija
et al. 1988; Prudic 1994; Scanlon 2002), soilwater balance
approach (Finch 1998; Jyrkama et al. 2002; Kendy et al.
2003), and numerical watershed (rainfall/runoff) modelling
(Leavesley and Stannard 1995; Arnold et al. 2000; Flint
et al. 2002; Walker et al. 2002) have been widely used for
the assessment of ground water recharge. Relative advantages and limitations of various techniques have been
discussed by Scanlon (2002). Amongst different techniques, those focussing the saturated zone have the
capability to estimate actual recharge since they compute
actual change of ground water storage. Techniques based
on the ground water levels (Sophocleous 1991; Hall and
Risser 1993; Healy and Cook 2002; Crosbie et al. 2005) are
amongst the widely applied methods for estimating
recharge rates. This is likely because of the abundance of
ground water level data and the simplicity of the technique
in estimating recharge rates from temporal fluctuations or
spatial patterns of ground water levels.
Similar to recharge computation, a multitude of methods
have been used to delineate ground water potential zones.
123
930
Common techniques include large-scale mapping of geologic and geomorphic features (Krishnamurthy et al. 1992;
Salama et al. 1994; Jaiswal et al. 2003), geophysical survey
(Stewart et al. 1983; Edet and Okereke 1997; Ezzedine et al.
1999; Shahid and Nath 2000; Pal and Majumdar 2001), and
borehole logging (Houston 2004; Majumdar and Pal 2005).
Borehole and resistivity surveys are expensive and extremely laborious particularly in hard-rock terrains. Remote
sensing and geographic information systems (GIS) are
being widely used for demarcation of ground water potential zones (Raj and Sinha 1989; Champatiray et al. 1993;
Gustafsson 1993; Saraf and Jain 1993; Chi and Lee 1994;
Mabee et al. 2002) and have gained popularity for availability of real world data. Combined use of remote sensing
and GIS has emerged as a better tool for hydrogeological
investigations (Saraf and Jain 1993). Remote sensing and
GIS techniques have been successfully used for the delineation of prospective artificial recharge sites (Saraf and
Choudhury 1998; Anbazhagan et al. 2005) and ground
water recharge zones (Saraf et al. 2004) in hard-rock areas.
However, almost all these studies have qualitatively marked
ground water potential zones by assignment of ranks and
weights to various hydrogeological parameters (Krishnamurthy et al. 1996; Saraf and Choudhury 1998; Shahid et al.
2000) and their subsequent integration, but bypassed computation of actual recharge. These approaches are totally
hypothetical and subjective, and hence unrealistic to compute actual aquifer-recharge or to evaluate rechargepotential of any region.
In the present study, lack of stream gauge data limits the
scope of stream water balance or channel water budget
modelling. Recharge estimation using tracer tests are
expensive and also unrealistic to represent study area with
large aerial extent and wide variations in soil, lithology,
topography, geomorphology, and land use. Numerical
models are based on many input parameters, which are
hardly available in close grids for the study area. On the
contrary, seasonal (pre- and post-monsoon) ground water
level data are available in close grids since people of Rajasthan including the Aravalli region are dependent mostly
on ground water resources. Limitations of using a constant
value of specific yield (Sophocleous 1985) and fluctuations
of ground water levels (Crosbie et al. 2005), have been
partially overcome by incorporating data and information
on soil (clay, sand, silt contents), lithology, and landform
units.
Modelling of recharge-potential of the region aims to
assess the relative capability for ground water replenishment with varying meteorological conditions. GIS is
capable of modelling water balance and water budget by
taking into account the spatial distribution of rainfall,
evapotranspiration and soil (Al-Abed et al. 2005). The
ability of GIS to handle, integrate, analyse, and model huge
123
volume of spatial and non-spatial data of a large area (ElKadi et al. 1994; Saraf et al. 2004) have encouraged us to
carry out a GIS-based ground water recharge-potential
modelling in the hard-rock terrain of the semi-arid Aravalli
region. The water level fluctuation (WLF) method is a postevent but realistic and direct method of recharge estimation
particularly for less-developed regions with limited data on
hydrological and hydraulic parameters. Therefore, using the
WLF method, a GIS-based attempt has been made to
develop a rainfall infiltration factor (RIF) technique, a coevent model for the estimation of recharge and rechargepotential of the Aravalli terrain. In the absence of sufficient
accurate data for various meteorological, hydrological, and
hydraulic parameters, modelling is carried out with the
assumptions: (1) negligible effect of evapotranspiration, (2)
zero base-flow, (3) no component of lateral flow, and
aquifer-recharge only through gravity flow.
The study area
Rajasthan, the largest state of India is situated in the northwestern part and is largely an arid region. The Aravalli, one
of the oldest mountain ranges of the world is situated in the
south-central part of the Rajasthan state. It separates the
eastern plain of the Malwa Plateau from the western Thar
Desert (Fig. 1). The present study is focused in major parts
of the Aravalli region including the entire Rajsamand and
Udaipur districts, parts of Sirohi, Pali, and Ajmer districts
of Rajasthan, and a small part of northern Gujarat. The
study area in total comprises approximately 25,000 km2
in between latitudes N23300 N26180 and longitudes
E72240 E74360 .
The chief hydrogeological formations include weathered
and fractured granite, granite-gneiss, calc-gneiss, quartzite,
phyllites, and calc-biotitic-schist. The carbonate rocks are
mainly dolomite, marble and limestone. In the northern and
the southern parts of the terrain, folded strata dip mostly
towards the west while in the eastern, central, and western
parts beds are easternly dipping. Elevation in the region
varies within 2001,700 m; however, the mean altitude
varies within 400600 m above the mean sea level.
Landforms in the Aravalli region are both of erosional
and depositional in origin. The granitic hills and mounds,
as well as quartzite ridges and valleys are results of nonuniform aeolian erosion. The ridges are composed of
resistant rocks such as, quartzites, conglomerates, and grits;
while valleys have developed by weathering of less resistant rocks such as, phyllites, schists, and gneisses. The
other important morphological units are pediments and
buried pediments, which are present all over the terrain.
Valley fills and alluvium plains are mostly confined around
the streams and channels. The entire Aravalli region is
covered by crenulations of drainage channels that are dry
931
for most time of the year. The drainage network and pattern
of this province are largely controlled by the topography,
relief, lithology, morphology, and geological structures
(DST 1994; Sen 2002).
More than 90% of annual rainfall in Rajasthan including
the Aravalli region occur during monsoon season (June
September). Rainfall distribution varies spatially in different parts of the region, and temporally at the same place.
Evapotranspiration also varies seasonally and spatially
depending upon land use, vegetation, and soil moisture.
Water resources in this semi-arid region are under control of
the monsoon. The ground water conditions of this region
vary from place to place due to variations in soil, lithology,
land use, geomorphology, topography, and climate. Water
table in the Aravalli terrain has been found to mimic the
land-surface topography. The normal water table depth
varies in different lithologic domains. Water level fluctuates
seasonally in all rocks owing to recharge and extraction.
123
932
Alluvial areas
Sandy alluvium
16.0
Silty alluvium
10.0
Clayey alluvium
6.0
3.0
1.5
2.0
Hard-rock areas
Laterite
2.5
Sandstone
3.0
Quartzite
1.5
Limestone
2.0
Karstified limestone
8.0
1.5
0.3
Sandy soil
2.0
Loamy soil
1.5
Clay soil
0.0
Rocky-skeletal soil
1.0
Soil types
Landform classes
Valley fills
2.0
Flood plains
2.0
Pediments
1.0
Buried pediments
1.5
123
933
normalisation and for normal recharge estimation. Therefore, if Rwlf is the rainfall recharge computed using the
WLF method, the recharge from rainfall alone can be
expressed as:
Rwlf RG Rir Rwc RT
h Sy DG RO
where Rwlf rainfall recharge estimated for a particular nondrought year, h rise in ground water level (positive fluctuation) in the monsoon season for that particular year, Sy
specific yield, DG gross ground water draft in the monsoon
season for the particular year, Rir recharge through returnflow from ground water irrigation in the monsoon season
for that year, Rwc recharge from water conservation structures like canals and check dams in the monsoon season for
that particular year, RT recharge from tanks and ponds in
the monsoon season for that year, RO = Rir ? Rwc ? RT
recharge from other sources.
RIF RIFi CF 2
Model validation
The efficiency and success of a model is dependent on the
actual verification and validation through real data and
smaller the difference higher is the efficiency of the model. In
order to validate the present model, rainfall recharge has
been computed for the successive years of 19962000, using
WLF and RIF methods based on recorded rainfall and ground
water level data, and their difference [(Rwlf Rrif)/Rrif] are
computed year wise. A regional scale model is considered
efficient if the differences in recharge by two methods vary
within 20%the acceptable range (CGWB 1997).
Recharge-potential
10
123
934
123
935
123
936
Conclusions
The distributed RIF is found to varying in the range 0.01
0.75; extremely high RIF values [ 0.5 are found to be
associated mainly with the sandy gravel bed of dry channels, valley fills, alluvial, and flood plains. Since the
difference in recharge computed by the RIF and WLF
methods are found to be small, the model is considered
acceptable for natural recharge computation. The RIF
123
References
Al-abed N, Abdulla F, Khyarah AA (2005) GIS hydrological models
for managing water resources in the Zarqa river basin. Environ
Geol 47:405411
Al-Saafin AK, Bader TA, Shehata W (1990) Ground water recharge
in an arid karst area in Saudi Arabia. In: Simpson ES, Sharp JM
Jr (eds) Selected papers on hydrogeology, vol 1. IAH/Verlag
Heinz Heise, Hanover, pp 2941
Anbazhagan S, Ramasamy SM, Dasgupta S (2005) Remote sensing
and GIS for artificial recharge study, runoff estimation and
planning in Ayyar basin, Tamil Nadu, India. Environ Geol
48:158170
Arnold JG, Muttiah RS, Srinivasan R, Allen PM (2000) Regional
estimation of base flow and ground water recharge in the Upper
Mississippi River Basin. J Hydrol 227:2140
Athavale RN, Rangarajan R (1988) Natural recharge measurements in
the hard-rock regions of semi-arid India using tritium injection
a review. In: Simmers I (ed) Estimation of natural ground water
recharge. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 175195
Central Ground Water Board (CGWB) (1997) Ground water
resources of India. Central Ground Water Board, India
Champatiray PK, Roy AK, Dave V (1993) GIS and RS for ground
water investigation in Manbazar-II. ISRS National Symposium,
Guwahati, pp 180184
Chi KH, Lee BJ (1994) Extracting potential ground water area using
remotely sensed data and GIS techniques. In: Proceeding of the
regional seminar on integrated applications of remote sensing
and GIS for land and water resources management, Bangkok
(Bangkok: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the
Pacific), pp 6469
Constanz J, Thomas CL, Zellweger G (1994) Influence of diurnal
variations in stream temperature on streamflow loss and ground
water recharge. Water Resour Res 30:32533264
Cook PG, Jolly ID, Leaney FW, Walker GR (1994) Unsaturated zone
tritium and chlorine 36 profiles from southern Australia: their
use as tracers of soil water movement. Water Resour Res
30:17091719
Crosbie RS, Binning P, Kalma JD (2005) A time series approach to
inferring ground water recharge using the water table fluctuation
method. Water Resour Res 41: W01008, doi:10.1029/2004W
R003077
Department of Science, Technology (DST) (1994) Resource atlas of
Rajasthan. Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur
Edet AE, Okereke CS (1997) Assessment of hydrogeological
conditions in basement aquifers of the Precambrian Oban massif.
southeastern Nigeria. J Appl Geophys 36:195204
El-kadi AI, Oloufa AA, Eltahan AA, Malik HU (1994) Use of a
geographic information system in site-specific ground water
modelling. Ground Water 32:617625
Eriksson E, Khunakasem V (1969) Chloride concentration in ground
water, recharge rate and rate of deposition of chloride in the
Israel Coastal Plain. J Hydrol 7:178197
Ezzedine S, Rubin Y, Chen J (1999) Bayesian method for hydrogeological site characterization using borehole and geophysical
survey data: theory and application to the Lawrence Livermore
937
National Laboratory Superfund site. Water Resour Res 35:2671
2683
Flint AL, Flint LE, Kwicklis EM, Fabryka-martin JT, Bodvarsson GS
(2002) Estimating recharge at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, USA:
comparison of methods. Hydrogeol J. doi:10.1007/s10040-0010169-1
Finch JW (1998) Estimating direct ground water recharge using a
simple water balance modelsensitivity to land surface parameters. J Hydrol 211:112125
Geological Survey of India (GSI) (1995a) Lithological map of the
Pre-Cambrians of the Aravalli region: Southern Rajasthan and
North-eastern Gujarat, India (1:250,000 scale)
Geological Survey of India (GSI) (1995b) Structural geological map
of the Pre-Cambrians of the Aravalli Region: Southern Rajasthan
and North-eastern Gujarat, India (1:250,000 scale)
Gustafsson P (1993) High resolution satellite data and GIS as a tool
for assessment of ground water potential of a semi-arid area.
IXth Thematic Conference on Geologic Remote Sensing,
Pasadena, California, USA (811 February 1993), 1, pp 609619
Hall DW, Risser DW (1993) Effects of agricultural nutrient management on nitrogen fate and transport in Lancaster county
Pennsylvania. Water Resour Bull 29:5576
Healy RW, Cook PG (2002) Using ground water levels to estimate
recharge. Hydrogeol J 10:91109
Houston J (2004) High-resolution sequence stratigraphy as a tool in
hydrogeological exploration in the Atacama Desert. Q J Eng
Geol Hydrogeol 37:717
Jaiswal RK, Mukherjee S, Krishnamurthy J, Saxena R (2003) Role of
remote sensing and GIS techniques for generation of ground
water prospect zones towards rural developmentan approach.
Int J Remote Sens 24:9931008
Jyrkama MI, Sykes JF, Normani SD (2002) Recharge estimation for
transient ground water modelling. Ground water 40:638648
Kendy E, Gerard-marchant P, Walter MT, Zhang Y, Liu C, Steenhuis
TS (2003) A soil-water-balance approach to quantify ground
water recharge from irrigated cropland in the North China plain.
Hydrol Process 17:20112031
Khair K, Haddad F (1993) The fractured carbonate rocks of Lebanon
and their seasonal springs. In: Hydrogeology of hard rocks,
Memoirs of 24th Congress of IAH, Oslo, Part 2, pp 11351144
Krishnamurthy J, Srinivas G (1995) Role of geological and geomorphological factors in ground water exploration: a study using IRS
LISS data. Int J Remote Sens 16:25952618
Krishnamurthy J, Manavalan P, Saivasan V (1992) Application of
digital enhancement techniques for ground water exploration in a
hard rock terrain. Int J Remote Sens 13:29252942
Krishnamurthy J, Venkatesa Kumar N, Jayaraman V, Manivel M
(1996) An approach to demarcate ground water potential zones
through remote sensing and a geographic information system. Int
J Remote Sens 17:18671884
Lapham WW (1989) Use of temperature profiles beneath streams to
determine rates of vertical ground water flow and vertical
hydraulic conductivity. US Geol Surv Water Supply Paper, pp
23372372
Leavesley GH, Stannard LG (1995) The precipitationrunoff
modeling systemPRMS. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models
of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Colorado, pp 281310
Mabee SB, Curry PJ, Hardcastle KC (2002) Correlation of lineaments
to ground water inflows in a bedrock tunnel. Ground Water
40:3743
Majumdar RK, Pal SK (2005) Geoelectric and borehole lithology
studies for ground water investigation in alluvial aquifers of
Munger district. Bihar. J Geological Soc India 66:463474
Meijerink AMJ, de Brouwer HAM, Mannaerts CM, Valenzuela CR
(1994) Introduction to the use of Geographic Information
123
938
Systems for practical hydrology, UNESCO International Hydrological Programme, ITC Publication No. 23
Pal SK, Majumdar RK (2001) Determination of ground water
potential zones using iso-resistivity maps in alluvial areas of
Munger district, Bihar. Ind J Earth Sci 14:1626
Philips FM, Mattick JL, Duval TA (1988) Chlorine 36 and tritium
from nuclear weapons fallout as tracers for long-term liquid
movement in desert soils. Water Resour Res 24:18771891
Prudic DE (1994) Estimates of percolation rates and ages of water in
unsaturated sediments at two Mojave Desert sites, California
Nevada. US Geol Surv Paper 94:40794160
Raj S, Sinha AK (1989) An integral approach for the delineation of
potential ground water zones using satellite data: case study,
Udaipur District, Rajasthan. Asia-Pacific Remote Sens J 2:6164
Rangarajan R, Athavale RN (2000) Annual replenishable ground
water potential of Indiaan estimate based on injected tritium
studies. J Hydrol 234:3853
Ronan AD, Prudic DE, Thodal CE, Constantz J (1998) Field study
and simulation of diurnal temperature effects on infiltration and
variably saturated flow beneath an ephemeral stream. Water
Resour Res 34:21372153
Salama RB, Battle GA, Farrington P, Wilson V (1994) Basin
geomorphological controls on the mechanism of recharge and
discharge and its effect on salt storage and mobilisation
comparative study using geophysical surveys. J Hydrol 155:126
Saraf AK, Choudhury PR (1998) Integrated remote sensing and GIS
for ground water exploration and identification of artificial
recharge sites. Int J Remote Sens 19:18251841
Saraf AK, Jain SK (1993) Integrated use of remote sensing and GIS
methods for ground water exploration in parts of Lalitpur
District, UP International Conference on Hydrology and Water
Resources, New Delhi, 2022 December 1993
Saraf AK, Choudhury PR, Roy B, Sarma B, Vijay S, Choudhury S
(2004) GIS based surface hydrological modelling in identification of ground water recharge zones. Int J Remote Sens 25:5759
5770
123