Recycling Centre

Group Members
Juergen Christian Martin (0324228)
Project Manager
Arron Goh Swee Tien (0323838)
Architect
Vaanarasu Vasudevan (0324770)
Quantity Surveyor
Adam Aloysius Songan (0324450)
Scientist
Melvin Tan Teng Hung (0324938)
Environmentalist ( Environmental Engineer)
MODULE: EFFECTIVE PUBLIC COMMUNICATION ( FCOM0102)
FOUNDATION IN NATURAL AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT
SESSION: JAN 16 ( SEMESTER 2).

MARKING CRITERIA

Online Discussion Rubric:

Category
Quality of
information

Critical
Thinking

Reference
material

Participatio
n

Language

4
Postings clearly
relate to the
main topic and
add new
concepts, info.
They include
several
supporting
details and/or
examples
Postings
consistently
enhance the
critical thinking
process through
reflection about
issues and
difference
questioning of
self and others.
Postings
frequently refer
to textbook
material or other
reliable sources
(books, journal
articles,
websites).
Postings
encourage and
facilitate
interaction
among
members of the
online
community.
Postings
consistently
show
appropriate
vocabulary and
writing style.

3
Postings
clearly relate
to the main
topic. They
provide at
least 1
supporting
detail or
example.

2
Postings
clearly relate
to the main
topic. No
details
and/or
examples are
given.

1
Postings
have little or
nothing to do
with the
main topic or
simply
restate the
main
concept.

Postings show
individual
critical
thinking, but
do not apply
reflection and
questioning to
others
statements.

Postings
respond to
questions
from others
but do not
show
reflection or
questioning
of ideas.

No response
to questions
from others.

Postings show
evidence of
having read
textbook,
include at least
one reference
to text or other
sources.
Postings
respond to
other members
of the online
community.

Postings show
evidence of
having read
textbook, no
references to
any sources.

Postings
include
opinions only,
no evidence
of reading
any reliable
sources.

Postings
rarely
interact with
or respond to
other
members of
the online
community.
Postings
often include
inappropriate
vocabulary
and writing
style.

Postings
respond to
the main
question of
the
discussion
facilitator
only.
Postings
consistently
show
inappropriate
vocabulary
and writing

Postings
usually show
appropriate
vocabulary and
writing style.

Marks

style.

Final Discussion Mark:

This rubric adapted from rubric developed by Amy Finch PhD and Liane Connelly PhD, RN 12/01
Fort Hays State University

Summary
As the appointed consultant team, our group has been able to come up
with a good solution for a better future recycling methods. In the beginning, we
approach by using the eco-friendly methods to handle the matter. We actually
came up with the idea to use renewable energy to sustain our resources such as
wind turbines, solar panel and many others. We plan to build our building using
recycled materials as well, it is not only eco-friendly but it is also cost effective.
Instead from building something from scratch, we will be using machinery that
can do all the task that we need. This way we can save cost with suitable
maintenance where it can serve its purpose for a long period of time without
throwing it away. Moreover, we can build the recycling centre with low cost
building construction system, affordable materials, monolithic concrete building
system so that it will greatly reduce the cost. We planned on purchasing 2 or
more machinery from the company Material Recycling Facilities (MRF) which
provides advanced machinery which can help in our mass production of
collection or even built one using Dave Hekkens Precious Plastic Recycling
blueprints because we only recycle 10% of waste plastic. There will also be a
pocket park within the compound of the recycling centre, so the flow of people
nearby will be encouraged to go for a go-green motive and human-nature
relationship, it also helps to deprive the bad reputation of a dark, dull and scary
feeling towards a warehouse.
252 words