Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Structure of Presentation
The best way to do this is to talk through
some of the qualitative projects I have worked
on and supervised. So some bias towards my
experiences.
So not everything can be covered in detail but
you will have a sense of how to structure your
methodology chapter and organise your
discussion.
Data Corpus
Data Set
Axial coding
Open coding
Hierarchical coding
Latent themes
Semantic meanings etc
Race
Sector
2 female
7 Private Sector
14 male
9 Public sector
Sampling example 2
Groh et al, 2011
Sampling example 3
Ruggunan 2013
Sampling example 4
(Sidat,2007)
Thematic Analysis
Unlike quantitative research, where survey
instruments can be administered effectively by
third parties or electronically, I suggest that you
do as much of your qualitative data collection by
yourself.
Esp interviews, focus groups
Exceptions may be where ethical conflicts exist.
Rationale is that it makes subsequent steps easier
but not always possible with larger samples,
global research sites etc. Use your discretion.
Aim is data reduction
4. Reviewing Themes
You now have candidate themes which have to
be reviewed.
They are candidates because some may not have
enough data to support them for example, or you
may want to merge or separate themes or even
remove certain themes.
You want to reduce data further
You want internal coherence in a theme and
strong distinctions between themes.
Examples of themes
Themes examples
Themes examples
Pull Factors from the public to the private sector (n=16)
Number of interviewees
Percentage of interviewees
Remuneration
16
100
Working conditions
14
88
Autonomy of work
14
88
13
81
Career pathing.
10
63
Career pathing: Histopathologists have better career pathing in the private sector
A common thread through the various narratives of the participants was their implicit and explicit
references to career pathing and career mobility. Their narratives demonstrate respondents beliefs that
the public sector offers minimal career pathing opportunities compared with employment in the private
sector.
Thats an interesting questionmy experience has been that unless I wanted to become head of
department there was no other career path available to me. Now that I am in private employment, I can
decide to have a career track towards partnership, or focus more on marketing of the laboratory, or
pursue research based projects on my own. Im still young so I havent decided how I want to develop
but there are for sure many many options available to me here [in private sector] than at my previous
employer. (Interview: Participant 4)
Long-term career prospects are better in the private sector than in the public sector. As one participant
from the public sector expressed:
They have frozen posts...the people who qualified are still stagnant, not moving up- no job offers. So, if
jobs are frozen, people are going to leave. They are not going to stay at that level- registrar or whatever
level because they are now qualified. There is a need for more consultants but they are not opening it
up. So there is an exodus at the moment. People are leaving and it is a lot (Interview: Participant 15,
2011).
Thesis writing
Since you dont have variable here as in quantitative
research you may want to divide your discussion
chapters according to the themes you have discovered.
In this case there is no separate findings chapter, but a
series of discussion chapters based on your themes.
How are your themes similar to and different from the
literature?
Example of professional status/gendering of work
You are doing interpretive work not journalistic
reporting.
Rigour
You have to provide an explanation of rigour
in your data analysis process.
Meaning versus objectivity or whether
participants tell the truth.
Triangulation/ verification
Credibility , transferability (not always possible
or needed), dependability (explain in detail
the research process, reflective commentary,
confirmability (audit trail)
Unstrucutred
Direct
Observations
Quotations
**
Structured
Direct
Observations
Simple
Tables
Matrices Maps
Diagrams
****
****
*****
****
****
**
Taxonomies
TYPE OF
QUALITATIVE
DATA
COLLECTION
ETHNOGRAPHIC MODELS
Scales
(Single
...MDS)
Conceptual Behavioral
ConceptualBehavioral
***
***
*****
****
Key Informant
Interviews
*****
****
****
***
****
*****
**
**
Focus Groups
*****
****
****
***
**
****
***
***
****
****
*****
**
***
**
**
PRA Group
Techniques
Free Lists
**
Pile Sorts
Triads
**
Paired
Comparisons
*****
**
**
***
***
* less useful
less complex
**
*****
*****
*****
***
***
more complex
Matrices
Figure 3
Method
Key
Informant
interview
Direct
Observation
Free Lists
Pile Sorts
Paired
Comparisons
Focus Group
Discussions
Matrices
vari ed appearance of
the acti vi ty, not cl earl y
seen as rel axi ng when
hurri edl y done outsi de
the workpl ace
Conclusion
cl earer understandi ng of
reasons peopl e sm oke
outsi de the Workpl ace
Next Investigative
Step
Pl an an i nterventi on to hel p
those sm oki ng outsi de
bui l di ngs to stop