Professional Documents
Culture Documents
wives with the very problems they had fled to the theatre to escape
(Gordon, 1992, pg. 3). This reference encapsulates Sondheims desire to
challenge audiences, in a time where the home truths were raw and many
Americans had seen the ugly face of The American Dream.
Stephen Sondheim stripped back the ideas of what a musical could be
through Company (1970), revealing the hard truths of life in post-Sixties
America. The bachelor life of Robert/Bobby for the majority of the piece is
an antithesis to the families portrayed in the 40s and 50s posters. (See
Appendix B). This said, the fragile nature of each of the relationships
and character throughout the vignettes could be seen as a hard hitting
theme to discuss in the early 70s. The show is written through the eyes of
Bobby so that the audience are confronted with the less than ideal
aspects of commitment. Throughout the show the show presents the
central themes through vignettes of couples using many things to supress
their frustrations, from karate to living with one and other post divorced
through to Jenny and David experimenting with weed, followed with the
line incompatible even when stoned (Sondheim et al, 1970, pp. 9-10).
We are subjected to relationships which exist beyond the fairy tale
endings we saw in the Golden Era. It suggests that there is a larger arch
and metaphor to the musical, which Sondheim along with Hal Prince
(Director) and George Furth (Book) backs in saying; In Company we were
making between contemporary marriage and the Island of Manhattan
(Gordon, 1992, p. 38). Sondheims hidden metaphor is presented through
the hazards of Manhattan and the human instincts tendency to conceal
itself from these perils. What it proposes is that post sixty America and
more exclusively Manhattan is increasingly containing itself into a bubble
and its continual hustle and bustle nature takes its toll on the fundamental
elements of relationship. As written in Time Magazine It is not the placid
old heaven-ordained, till-death-do-us-part, for-better-for-worse institution
it used to be (Time Magazine, 1970, p.62) Therefore through Company
we see the similarities of fragile relationships and the big city on the
characters within the piece and the human condition dealing with the
boom or bust nature of The American Dream and critically capitalism. The
impact of the derailing The American Dream throughout the sixties is
projected through Company. Sondheim says, It dealt with the increasing
difficulty in making one to one relationships in an increasingly
dehumanized society (Zadan, 1986, p. 131) this highlights that the
central metaphor of how Manhattan; the hub of growth, wealth and
capitalism in the United States is reflected in each couples relationship,
and highlights the truth behind The American Dream and the White Picket
Fence ideology of the 1950s.
Though Sondheim himself admits that he feels that Sweeney Todd: The
Demon Barber of Fleet Street is about the human obsession with revenge
and how it consumes a vengeful person, as he said in Sondheim & Co,
...what the show is really about is obsession(Zadan, 1986, p. 245). The
character of Sweeney was contemporized when Christopher Bond wrote
the play in 1973 and he goes from the greed driven murderer to an
ordinary working-class man whose life is invaded and destroyed by a
Despite the cynicism from Sondheim in the 1980s the clear message of
this anthem-like piece still has the fundamental structure of the idealistic
and optimistic Rogers & Hammerstein in the 1940s and 1950s (Bradley,
2004, p. 171). It is interesting therefore to see this transition by Stephen
Sondheim in the early 1980s to reflect some of the optimism seen
previously by his mentor. Socio-politically, Reagans election victory had
huge impact on the rise and the instilling belief back into The American
Dream, on the Reagan foundation page that people were able to keep
more of the money for which they worked so hardin a phrase, The
American Dream had been restored (REAGANOMICS, no date).
Throughout the 1980s America was experiencing a rise in patriotism
and The American Dream was well and truly alive. Assassins opened in
1990 whilst the U.S was amidst the Gulf War in the Middle East. According
to Art isnt Easy by Joanne Gordon he never intended to write a political
thesis (Gordon, 1992, p.319). It appears in the lyric;
Everybodys got the right to be happylifes not as bad as it seems
Everybodys got the right to their dreams. (Sondheim and Weidman,
2004, pp. 9-21)
The song deliberately provides the audiences an understanding of
Assassins. The songs lyrical and melodic line intentionally supports the
American system that all men have the right to be happy and achieve
their goals. His writing through the entire score references all parts of
American musical history. The heart of each song is that Everybodys got
the right to be happy (Sondheim and Weidman, 2004, pp. 9-21). Through
this songs simple and boring lyrics the faade of the American Dream is
revealed. At the end of the show all of the Assassins remerging and
singing the lyrics referenced earlier Everybodys got the right to be
happy (Gordon, 1992, p.337) this symbolic ending exploits the shallow
promises of The American Dream, validating the Assassins actions
through the constitutions the country was built upon. It was a hard hitting
piece and The NY Times David Richards claimed No Musical in the last
decade has dared this much. (Gordon, 1992, p.337).
We can see through the musicals that have been referred to in this piece
that all encompass the underlying theme that the American Dream was
not what had been originally presented/accepted, which until the works of
Stephen Sondheim was partly unexposed within the realms of Musical
Theatre. It is said in Art isnt Easy that This was an audacious course to
follow, for in doing so Sondheim flouted convention and flew in the face of
audience expectation (Gordon, 1992, p. 3). It is this drive and need to
challenge audiences with what was not necessarily deemed acceptable,
that made him a popular and revered composer and lyricist with the
general Broadway audience. Whether it be Company and the metaphor of
Manhattan or the critique of the ruling classes in Sweeney Todd: The
Demon Barber of Fleet Street, his quasi-Marxist, anti-Capitalist pieces
which all exploit the fundamental problem with The American Dream. As
an audience member his exploration of the human condition and the
reflection of society also intertwines with large critical theories that
develop in most of his work. Even with these selected pieces he explores
the many issues with The American Dream and whether or not referenced
directly, they are presented alongside the socio-political landscape of the
time. His clever lyrics and music reflect the under currents of U.S politics
by consistently referencing the derailing of the American Dream which
remained unspoken in the Golden Era of Broadway Musical Theatre.
Reference List
1. Laurents, A., Bernstein, L., Sondheim, S. and Corporation, H. L.
P. (1987) West side story: Based on a conception of Jerome
Robbins. Milwaukee, WI: Hal Leonard Publishing.
2. David Edward Byrd - follies (1970) Available at:
http://www.david-edward-byrd.com/theatre1-1.html (Accessed:
12 December 2015).
3. Gordon, J. L. (1992) Art Isnt easy: The theater of Stephen
Sondheim. 1st edn. New York: Da Capo Press.
4. Sondheim, S., Furth, G. and Noeltner, R. H. (1983) Company: A
HarperCollins Publishers.
7. Gussow, M. (1979) Sweeney Todd: A Little Nightmare Music,
Bibliography
Books
1. Adams, J. T. (2012) The epic of America. New Brunswick, NJ:
Transaction Publishers.
2. Bradley, I. C. (2004) Youve got to have a dream: The message of
4. Zadan, C. (1986) Sondheim & Co. 2nd edn. New York: HarperCollins
Publishers.
5. Sondheim, S. (2010) Finishing the hat: The collected lyrics of
musical comedy (vocal score). Winona, MN: Hal Leonard Pub. Corp.
9. Sondheim, S. and Weidman, J. (2004) Assassins. New York: Theatre
10.
Articles
11.
Websites
12.
13.
14.
15.
REAGANOMICS (no date) Available at:
http://www.reaganfoundation.org/economic-policy.aspx (Accessed: 13
December 2015)
Appendix
A.