Professional Documents
Culture Documents
P R O B A B L Y e v e r y o n e who a t t e m p t s to do p r e c i s e
e x p e r i m e n t a l m e a s u r e m e n t s on b i n a r y a l l o y s of i r o n
and c a r b o n feels t e m p t e d to t r y his hand at r e v i s i n g
the F e - C d i a g r a m . Now that I have been a s k e d to p r e p a r e a d i a g r a m for the Metals Handbook of the A m e r ican Society for M e t a l s , I a m no longer able to r e s i s t
this t e m p t a t i o n . A c t u a l l y the d i a g r a m of H a n s e n a n d
A n d e r k o I is v e r y good and the a m o u n t of r e v i s i o n r e q u i r e d is quite m i n i m a l . The s a m e can be said of the
m o r e r e c e n t d i a g r a m of E l l i o t t , G l e i s e r , and R a m a k r i s h n a . 2 The l a t t e r had the advantage of the v e r y a c c u r a t e d e t e r m i n a t i o n of the ~ - s o l i d u s by Benz and
E l l i o t t 3 but o m i t t e d th~ n e a r l y s i m u l t a n e o u s p u b l i c a tion of data on the liquidus by Buckley and H u m e R o t h e r y . 4 "In t h e i r s o m e w h a t o l d e r d i a g r a m D a r k e n
and G u r r y ~ saw to it that the b o u n d a r y lines w e r e cons i s t e n t with m e a s u r e d p r o p e r t i e s of the p h a s e s i n volved and with the laws of t h e r m o d y n a m i c s . This
p r o c e d u r e can be r e c o m m e n d e d to anyone who s e t s
out to c o n s t r u c t a phase d i a g r a m . The t h e r m o d y n a m i c
p r o p e r t i e s of the i n d i v i d u a l c o m p o n e n t s and in p a r t i c u l a r t h e i r p a r t i a l m o l a r p r o p e r t i e s within the h o m o g e n e o u s phases provide a m o r e complete p i c t u r e of
the s y s t e m than does the p h a s e d i a g r a m a l o n e . It is
i n t e n d e d that this p a p e r s e r v e a s a review and e v a l u a tion of this kind of data with a view to r e v i s i o n of the
c o m p i l a t i o n of H u l t g r e n , O r r , A n d e r s o n , and K e l l e y . 6
The p o s s i b i l i t i e s for m e a n i n g f u l r e v i s i o n r e s t on
s e v e r a l m o r e r e c e n t p u b l i c a t i o n s . Scheil, S c h m i d t ,
and Wt]nning7 d e t e r m i n e d the t h e r m o d y n a m i c p r o p e r t i e s of F e - C a u s t e n i t e s and c e m e n t i t e u s i n g the COCOz e q u i l i b r i u m . A s i m i l a r study of a u s t e n i t e by
B a n - ya, E lliott, and C h i p m a n 6 extended the t e m p e r a t u r e r a n g e and d e r i v e d s i m p l e m a t h e m a t i c a l s t a t e m e n t s for the t h e r m o d y n a m i c p r o p e r t i e s of the c o m ponents. F o r m e r discrepancies regarding solubilities
of g r a p h i t e and c e m e n t i t e in the c~-phase have a p p a r JOHN CH1PMAN, a Fellow of T.M.S. and A.S.M., is Professor
Emeritus, Department of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., and Consultant, Inorganic Materials Research Division, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory,
University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
Manuscript submitted March 22, 1971.
METALLURGICALTRANSACTIONS
I) THE AUSTENITE F I E L D
The fcc solid solution is the h e a r t of the b i n a r y s y s tem and its p r o p e r t i e s and b o u n d a r y l i n e s a r e r a t h e r
w e l l - k n o w n . The a c t i v i t y of c a r b o n a s a function of
t e m p e r a t u r e and c o m p o s i t i o n has b e e n d e t e r m i n e d by
m a n y o b s e r v e r s , chiefly through s t u d i e s of the equilibria
C + 2H2= CH4
[1]
C + COz = 2CO
[2]
c e p t a t t h e h i g h e s t c a r b o n c o n c e n t r a t i o n s ) a n d of B a n y a 8 e t a l . S t u d i e s of r e a c t i o n [1] h a v e b e e n s u b j e c t to
e r r o r s e s p e c i a l l y a t low c a r b o n l e v e l s , d u e to r e a c t i o n of m e t h a n e w i t h r e s i d u a l g a s i m p u r i t i e s . T h i s i s
t h o u g h t to h a v e b e e n r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e d i f f e r e n c e s
o b s e r v e d b y S m i t h 2~ b e t w e e n a c t i v i t y c o e f f i c i e n t s d e t e r m i n e d b y t h e two e q u i l i b r i a . It m a y h a v e a c c o u n t e d
also for the disagreement between the values accepted
h e r e a n d t h o s e of S c h e n c k a n d K a i s e r 2~ a n d of S c h t ] r m a n n , S c h m i d t , a n d W e g e n e r . 22 S t u d i e s b a s e d o n r e a c t i o n [2] h a v e not b e e n i m m u n e to s i m i l a r b u t g e n e r a l l y
s m a l l e r e r r o r s w h i c h t e n d to b e c o m e g r e a t e r w i t h
increasing temperature and carbon content.
Ban-ya, E lliott, and Chipman 8 covered a wide range
of c o m p o s i t i o n a n d t e m p e r a t u r e a n d in t h e i r a n a l y s i s
of t h e d a t a i n c l u d e d c o n s i d e r a t i o n of t h e e a r l i e r w o r k .
T h e y e x p r e s s e d t h e i r r e s u l t s i n t e r m s of a v e r y s i m p l e m o d e l i n w h m h t h e a c t i v i t y of a n i d e a l i n t e r s t i t i a l
s o l u t e is p r o p o r t i o n a l to t h e r a t i o of f i l l e d to u n f i l l e d
interstitial sites. Since there is one interstitial site
per lattice atom, the ideal activity at great dilution is
ac ~ nc/(riFe -- nC ) = Y C / ( 1 -- YC ) = ZC
[3]
w h e r e YC i s t h e a t o m r a t i o n O / r i F e a n d t h e t e r m
Y C / ( 1 - YC) m a y b e a b b r e v i a t e d a s z C . D e v i a t i o n s
from the ideal at finite concentrations were repres e n t e d by a n a c t i v i t y c o e f f i c i e n t V#c = a c / z c w h i c h
w a s f o u n d to b e r e l a t e d to t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n , YC b y
the simple equation
[4]
where ~
i s i t s v a l u e a t i n f i n i t e d i l u t i o n a n d 0C i s a n
i n t e r a c t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t , b o t h b e i n g f u n c t i o n s of t e m perature.
In t h e i r plot of log K v s 1/T t h e y f o u n d t h a t a
s t r a i g h t l i n e b a s e d o n d a t a a t 900 ~ to 1150~ f e l l o u t s i d e t h e 2 ~ l i m i t s a t 1300~
A slightly curved line
was therefore suggested and an equation was devised
to fit i t . It w a s k n o w n t h a t s o m e d i s s o c i a t i o n of CO
h a d o c c u r r e d a t t h e h i g h e r t e m p e r a t u r e a n d it now a p pears that they may have been overoptimistic with reg a r d to t h e a c c u r a c y of t h e 1300~ d a t a . F o r t h i s
reason a simpler equation closely approximating line
A of R e f . 8 w i l l b e u s e d h e r e f o r a l l c o m p o s i t i o n s a n d
t e m p e r a t u r e s (1968 s c a l e ) w i t h i n t h e a u s t e n i t e f i e l d :
II) T H E y - L I Q U I D E Q U I L I B R I U M
T h e s o l i d u s l i n e of B e n z a n d E l l i o t # ~ a n d a p o r t i o n
of t h e l i q u i d u s l i n e of B u c k l e y a n d H u m e - R o t h e r y 4 c o r r e c t e d to t h e 1968 s c a l e a r e s h o w n i n F i g . 1. T h e
solidus has been given a slight inflection with downw a r d c u r v a t u r e n e a r i t s l o w e r e n d to c o n f o r m to t h e
d a t a of B a n - y a a e t a l . B o t h l h a e s a r e s u p e r i o r in a c c u r a c y to t h o s e of e a r l i e r i n v e s t i g a t o r s b u t a r e
s t r o n g l y s u p p o r t e d b y t h e e a r l i e r w o r k of A d c o c k . 2~
T h e l i q u i d u s l i n e i n c l u d e s a d o t t e d e x t e n s i o n to t h e
c a l c u l a t e d ~7 m e l t i n g p o i n t of y - F e . I n t e r p o l a t e d v a l u e s
a r e l i s t e d i n T a b l e II a n d t h e e n t i r e l i q u i d u s l i n e a p p e a r s i n F i g . 4. T h e a c t i v i t y of c a r b o n a t a n y t e m p e r ature is the same at the liquidus and solidus composit i o n s . V a l u e s c a l c u l a t e d f r o m E q . [5] a r e i n c l u d e d i n
the table.
[5j
equation is:
Graphite
Temp, ~
727*
738t
800
900
1000
1100
1148~
115482
1495~
1400 ~ 9 4 o
,oo
+7
zo ~
"
./~f11141
"8
~ llO0--
/'2"
~-iooo
Pct C
YC
Pct C
0.0320
0 0408
0.0561
0 0725
0 0896
0 0990
0.68
0 87
1.19
1.53
1 89
2.08
0 0356
0.77
0.94
1.22
1.55
1.92
2.11
-
Cementlte
YC
*Cement]te eutectold.
#Graphite eutectoid.
$Cementlte eutectm.
82Graphite eutectic.
I
,5
(Auste mte )
log [ y c / ( 1 - y c )]
T h e a c t i v i t y of i r o n , b y t h e G i b b s - D u h e m
!
+
1558 ~
m27~~
1500
log a ~ = 2 3 0 0 / T - 0 . 9 2 0 + (3860/T)y C
[6]
T h e s o l u b i l i t y of g r a p h i t e i n a u s t e n i t e i s r e a d i l y c a l c u l a t e d f r o m E q . [5J b y s e t t i n g a ~ e q u a l to u n i t y . T w o
o t h e r k i n d s of d a t a a r e a l s o a v a i l a b l e : t h e d i r e c t m e a s u r e m e n t s of W e l l s 2a a n d of G u r r y 24 a n d a d o w n w a r d
e x t r a p o l a t i o n of t h e s o l i d u s l i n e of B e n z a n d E l l i o t # a
to t h e e u t e c t i c t e m p e r a t u r e . A l l of t h e s e d a t a a r e i n
rather good agreement and average values are shown
i n T a b l e I. F o r c o n v e n i e n c e t h e d a t a o n s o l u b i l i t y of
c e m e n t i t e a r e i n c l u d e d b u t a d i s c u s s i o n of t h e s e a n d
of t h e a - y b o u n d a r y w i l l b e d e f e r r e d to l a t e r s e c t i o n s .
B o t h s o l u b i l i t y t i n e s a r e s h o w n i n F i g . 1.
0.0442
0.0580
0.0730
0.0910
0 1000
-
///
9115 ~
oo\
//
800 -d+ T ~
///76r - .... :f,-~'
_ : =,~~6,"*%7
8 / , ~ .'
.
T + Fe3 C
700 -a~
0
I
05
0 77
I
I
I0
I5
Corbon Weight Percent
I
20
23
cl c\,
727*
Fig. 1--Portion of the phase d i a g r a m Fe-C. Metastabie Yrange and s y s t e m Fe-Fe3C shown by dashed lines. Curie t e m p e r a t u r e dotted.
METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS
Equilibria
,oo.
7-Solidus
Temp, ~
__..
2-JJ.z-
Liquidus
Pct C
YC
ac
Pct C
YC
2.11
2.08
1 85
1 59
1.30
1.01
0.71
0.42
0 17
0 O0
.
0,1000
0.0990
0.0877
0.0718
0.0613
0.0475
0.0333
0.0196
0.0079
0.0000
1 000
0.720
0.457
0.323
0.203
0 117
0 057
0.019
0.000
4.30
4.26
3.93
3.50
3.02
2.47
1.88
1.21
0.53
0.00
.
0,2092
0 2072
0.1906
0.1689
0.1450
0.1179
0.0891
0.0570
0,0248
0.0000
1148"
11541"
1200
1250
1300
1350
1400
1450
1495:~
152782
1538w
*Cementge eutectlc.
tGraphlte eutecnc.
:~Pentecttc. The valueofa c is an averagefrom Eqs. [5] and [7].
~IMetastable meltingpoint of 7-Fe.
wMelting point of 8-Fe
06
0403-
I ~L&I200*C
-o
///~
-;-~
o z -
o" 0 , -
/ / /
""
[660
,760
-
.;.;
j/ // /
++>-"
-030
~,
o I
o 2
Yc
Fig. 2--Activ'ity coefficient of carbon in liquid iron. Lines Eq.
[7]. A graphite solubility; + gas equilibrium; [] points on
tiquidus.
III) T H E L I Q U I D P H A S E
T h e a c t i v i t y of c a r b o n in liquid F e - C a l l o y s h a s
b e e n d e t e r m i n e d by a n u m b e r of i n v e s t i g a t o r s u s i n g
s e v e r a l m e t h o d s . T h e b e s t a c c u r a c y has b e e n
a c h i e v e d by R i c h a r d s o n and D e n n i s 26 u s i n g t h e e q u i l i b r i u m of E q . [2J. It is k n o w n that s e r i o u s e r r o r s
o c c u r at high c a r b o n c o n t e n t and the p r e c i s i o n of the
d a t a i m p r o v e s a s the c a r b o n c o n t e n t and the CO c o n t e n t of the g a s d e c r e a s e . T h e i r e x p e r i m e n t a l t e m p e r a t u r e s (48) w e r e 1560 ~ 1660 ~ and 1760~
For lower
t e m p e r a t u r e s I h a v e u s e d t h e a c t i v i t y in a u s t e n i t e at
p o i n t s a l o n g the s o l i d u s , T a b l e II, to d e t e r m i n e the
a c t i v i t y c o e f f i c i e n t in the l i q u i d f o r c o m p o s i t i o n s
a l o n g the l i q u i d u s . F o r h i g h e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s t h e
s o l u b i l i t y of g r a p h i t e f u r n i s h e s a s e c u r e b a s e w h e r e
a C = 1. U s i n g t h e s e d a t a j and a d o p t i n g the f o r m of
E q . [4], I h a v e o b t a i n e d t h e e q u a t i o n : ~
log a~ = l 1 8 0 / T - 0.870 + (0.72 + 3 4 0 0 / T ) y C
+ log [ y c / ( 1 - Y c ) ]
[7]
It w a s s h o w n that t h i s e q u a t i o n a g r e e s f a i r l y w e l l w i t h
t h a t of B a n - y a e t a l . ~ w h e r e l i q u i d and s o l i d d a t a c o u l d
be c o m p a r e d . T h e a g r e e m e n t w i t h E q . [5] is d i s t i n c t l y
b e t t e r a s s h o w n in F i g . 2 w h e r e the p o i n t s m a r k i n g
METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS
o~
// ~ ~ /
l/
~ -I
--
L,qo,a
-~ol g
005
~2"
2 1
0
I%C
I
302
2%
3'/o
II
OI
4"/,,
5~
',)
02
6~
0
30~
YC
Fig. 3--Activity of carbon in 7 and liquid iron. Standard state
is graphite.
/
~.jsoo
x:f / ~oOseo
o 5
the l i q u i d u s h a v e b e e n c a l c u l a t e d f r o m the a c t i v i t y in
the s o l i d . At the p e r i t e c t i c the a c t i v i t y of c a r b o n in
the s o l i d by E q . [5] is 0.0199 w h i l e in the l i q u i d by
E q . [7] it is 0.0185. The d i s c r e p a n c y is n e g l i g i b l e
s i n c e it is e q u i v a l e n t to an e r r o r of l e s s than 0.01 pct
C in the p e r i t e c t i c a u s t e n i t e . A c c o r d i n g l y the a c t i v i t y
at the p e r i t e c t i c is t a k e n a s 0.019 0.001.
A s u m m a r y of t h e a c t i v i t y of c a r b o n in a u s t e n i t e
and in l i q u i d i r o n is g i v e n in F i g , 3. T h e c h e m i c a l p o t e n t i a l of c a r b o n m a y be r e a d a s PC - tt~ = 4 . 5 7 5 T
x log a c . T i e l i n e s in the t w o - p h a s e f i e l d a r e s h o w n ,
A line f o r c e m e n t i t e would be a l m o s t i n d i s t i n g u i s h a b l e
on t h i s s c a l e f r o m the g r a p h i t e l i n e at log a c = 0, It
would lie s l i g h t l y a b o v e t h i s l i n e at a l l t e m p e r a t u r e s
b e l o w the e u t e c t i c .
T h e a c t i v i t y of i r o n in the l i q u i d a s found by the
Gibbs-Duhem equation is:
log a/Fe = --(0.36 + 1700/T)y~
+ log (1 - y c )
[8]
~ooo ~
~
: :PFe
' : - -=- I- otm
----
900
BoLhng point
200O
PFe = 0 0 l otm
~83 ~
~+7
(D
~, 7O0
E
i38~
~15oo
L * Fe3C
i I
d + C
or G + Fe3C
12270
(I)
o-
~ )
#-mooo
H54~
T+C
or T Fe3C
600
FI
!
!
738~
727 ~
5ool--
o:. c
~_
_L-
-.
Fe~
2--3o_~ . . . . . . . . . . . . .
or e'+ F % C
OI
Fez
4
5
6
7
8
9
Corbon Weight Percent
IO
II
12
0 2
0.5 0.4
0 5
0.6
0 7
Carbon percent m 7-Fe
0.8
0.9
Fig. 5--Equilibria involving c~-ferrite. Metastable system F e F%C shown by dashed lines.
Temp, ~
Carbon, Wt Pct
1154
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
4 26 0 02
4.37
4.63
4.88
5.14
5.40 0.03
5.66
5 94 0.05
6.26 0 10
6.63 0 10
7.05
7.56 0.3
8.1
8.68
9.28 0.4
9.87
10.50
11.12
11.75 0.5
IV) THE
5-PHASE
AND
PERITECTIC
1400 1200
I000
I I I I
I
~C 800
I
I
600
f
5
log
~7
__
t r a t i o n is then obtained f r o m Eq. [5]. Points thus c a l culated a r e shown by dots in Fig. 5. The a g r e e m e n t
m e r e l y i n d i c a t e s a f a i r l y high d e g r e e of i n t e r n a l cons i s t e n c y a m o n g the v a r i o u s data, p e r h a p s as good as
can be expected in the a b s e n c e of i n f o r m a t i o n on the
p a r t i a l m o l a r heat capacity of c a r b o n .
The s o l u b i l i t y l i n e s for g r a p h i t e and c e m e n t i t e will
be d i s c u s s e d in a l a t e r s e c t i o n .
VI) ACTIVITY AND SOLUBILITY OF GRAPHITE
IN FERRITE
The activity of carbon in bcc iron has been determined in the range 590~ to 1495~ with a wide void in
the fcc region. Since the highest concentration is 0.09
pct C, Henry's law may be assumed and a c may be
taken as proportional to either xC or YC or zC within
the precision of the data. For the activity coefficient I
shall use r
= aC/YC, the value of a C for g r a p h i t e
being taken a s unity. A plot of log ~h~ vs 104/T, shown
in Fig. 6, p e r m i t s a c o m p a r i s o n throughout the e n t i r e
r a n g e . F o r the two points of Smith on the a b o u n d a r y
the a c t i v i t y of c a r b o n is c a l c u l a t e d f r o m the ~ bounda r y at the s a m e t e m p e r a t u r e , u s i n g Eq. {5j. The value
c r e d i t e d to Scht~rmann et al.38 is t h e i r g r a p h i t e solubility at the eutectoid. At the p e r i t e c t i c t e m p e r a t u r e ,
a C is taken f r o m an e a r l i e r s e c t i o n of this p a p e r . O t h e r
p o i n t s , i n c l u d i n g one by Smith 39 at 619~ a r e b a s e d on
gas e q u i l i b r i a and the c o r r e s p o n d i n g e q u i l i b r i u m with
g r a p h i t e . In the one point of D6nwald and W a g n e r , 19 a
m o d e r n value of p C _ / p c ~ for g r a p h i t e has b e e n substituted for the e r r ~ n e o u ~ v a l u e a c c e p t e d in 1931.
Other data a r e as r e p o r t e d by t h e i r a u t h o r s . The
plotted data of Swartz 9 include only those b a s e d on
c o m b u s t i o n a n a l y s i s of c a r b o n . The s t r a i g h t line
b a s e d on the a s s u m p t i o n that ACp = 0 has the equation:
log ~
= 5550/T - 2.49
[9]
which c o r r e s p o n d s to a heat of s o l u t i o n of g r a p h i t e ,
AH = 25.40 k c a l , a value l a r g e r than was p r e v i o u s l y
accepted. Below the graphite eutectoid, Eq. [9J may
be solved for the s o l u b i l i t y of g r a p h i t e (a c = 1). Exp r e s s e d in p a r t s p e r m i l l i o n , with a slight a d j u s t m e n t
to a g r e e with Fig. 5, this gives for the s o l u b i l i t y of
graphite:
/
/
/
I
[i0]
'%
D
,O"/z
I0
II
12
Fig. 6--Activity coefficient of carbon in t~-6-iron. The standard state is graphite; ~C= a~/v,-,.
METALLURGICALTRANSACTIONS
200
738
727
700
650
600
550
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
Graphite*
Fe3Ct
Fe:.2C :~
206
~.--~
~'0~"
-zoo-
" ~ ~
et
Schell
ol
~. Smith (mterpolo~ed~
[:] Eutectlc
___ _
--
So,ub,,,,.
,y,~-F~
-400
127
63
28
11 7
4.3
1 35
0 37
0 081
0,013
218
160
102
57
28
13
5.7
2.3
0 75
0.21
0.045
0.007
'~ - 8 0 0
-I000
1.3
0.30
0 050
0.0055
I
0
3, J A N U A R Y 1 9 7 2
-1200
I000
Fig. 7--Standard
I
I100
I
l
1200
Tempereture,
free energy
]
1300
1
1400
Kelvin
of the reaction
3 Fe(-/) + C ( g r a p h -
[11]
[12]
TRANSACTIONS
+4
"~,.~"~-"'~
__
~ ' v \
~+2-",c
, 1
600
"',
",,,
0~'~,,
[] FesC Wotase
A FesC Browning et al
---FesC Swartz solubility
O FesC From T-Fe data
V Fe2C ( Browning
~,~
,
o~
-I-
800
1000
Temperature, Kelwn
1200
ar~
1400
quoted. It is now possible to improve on this treatment by consideration of the data at higher temperatures, Fig. 7, and the thermal properties of the reacting species. This was done by Darken and Gurry 4~
with whose results the following calculations are in
good agreement.
The data points corresponding to the
observed methane equilibrium are shown in Fig. 8.
The high-temperature
data of Fig. 7 are easily recalculated using the free energy differences tabulated
by Orr and ChipmantT~to show the free energy of formation from metastable ~-Fe. The results are shown
in Fig. 8. "In order to establish the thermodynamic
properties from these data it is first necessary to examine the data on the enthalpy and entropy of FeaC.
At low temperatures
(68 ~ to 298~
the heat capacity
was determined by Seltz, McDonald, and Wells 51 whose
value for S~gs was 25.7 + 1.0. From this and data of
Schwarz and Ulich 5e and Naeser, ~3 Kelley and King 54
proposed an average value of S~98 = 24.2 i 1.0. More
recent measurements
by Mazur and Zacharko 55 have
covered the range 2 ~ to 20~ thus filling part of the
uncertainty in Seltz's estimate of the entropy. A recalculation of Seltz's data made very little change in
his original figure but probably improved its overall
reliability. The high-temperature
data on free energy
shown in Figs. 7 and 8 are better fitted by the value
S~%8 = 25.00. This value, which lies well within the
range of uncertainty, is adopted for the calculations
and tables.
Estimates of the thermodynamic
properties of Fe3C
at high temperatures
are based principally on the
measurements
of Naeser 53 and Umino.56 The latter
were recalculated by Darken and Gurry 46 and included
in their tabulated enthalpy data. Corresponding
values
of the free energy function came from the entropy and
equilibrium data mentioned above. Kelley ~7 used the
s a m e d a t a p l u s S c h w a r z a n d U l i c h ~2 to a r r i v e a t a
similar tabulation.
It i s now p o s s i b l e to m a k e s o m e n u m e r i c a l a d j u s t m e n t in t h e d a t a to c o n f o r m m o r e c l o s e l y w i t h t h e d i r e c t l y d e t e r m i n e d d a t a o n t h e f r e e e n e r g y of f o r m a METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS
H T - H s t ST-Sst
T,~
Cp
298.15
400
450
480*
500
600
700
800
850
900
950
1000
25.40
27.93
29.98
30.71
26.50
27.20
27.90
28.60
28.95
29 30
29.65
30.00
0
2710
4140
5052
5624
8309
11064
13889
15328
16784
18258
19749
0.00
7.80
11 21
13.17
14.34
19.23
23.48
27 25
28.99
30.65
32.34
33 78
S~
AG~
AH}
AS~-
25.00
32.80
36.21
38.17
39.34
44.23
48.48
52.25
53 99
55 65
57.24
58.78
4772
4274
3949
5985
6534
6802
4 07
5 65
6 34
3618
2916
2214
1524
1192
885
585
300
7083
7176
7121
6892
6692
6411
6019
5450
6.93
7 10
7.0l
6 71
6.47
6 14
5 72
5.15
*Curm temperature.
700" 600
500
I I I I
I
2 ~
E
400
I
500
I
2001000/
100
10
o_
Fe2C (X)
u
--
C
o
Grophlte ~
C,)
-2
001
-5
0001
-4
10
I
II
I
12
I
1:5
i
14
I
15
I
16
I
17
[
18
I
19
I
20
"1,,, 00001
21
I&/T
Fig. 9--Solubilities in a-Fe; line for (Fe2.2C) and solid line
for FeaC f r o m f r e e energy data.
lion. The s e l e c t e d values s h o w n in T a b l e V a r e b a s e d
p r i m a r i l y o n t h e e q u i l i b r i u m d a t a a t 500 ~ to 700~ a n d
t h e s o l u b i l i t y in ~ - F e at 1000~
T h e l i n e in F i g . 8 r e r e p r e s e n t i n g t h e f r e e e n e r g y of f o r m a t i o n of F e s C
f r o m c ~ - F e f o l l o w s t h e t a b u l a t e d v a l u e s up to 1000~
C o r r e s p o n d i n g v a l u e s f o r i t s s o l u b i l i t y in a - F e a r e
s h o w n in F i g . 9. T h e s e lie s l i g h t l y b e l o w t h e l i n e o b tained by S w a r t z f r o m i n t e r n a l f r i c t i o n m e a s u r e m e n t s
and d e c i d e d l y below e a r l i e r values by that m e t h o d .
The line m a y be r e p r e s e n t e d by the equation f o r the
s o l u b i l i t y of F e s C
log [C] c~ p p m = 6.38 - 4 0 4 0 / T
[13]
w h i c h c o r r e s p o n d s to a h e a t of s o l u t i o n of c e m e n t i t e ,
AH = 18.47 k c a l . T h i s i s to b e c o m p a r e d w i t h 24.0
kcal from Swartz's data.
B o r e l i u s a n d B e r g l u n d s8 m e a s u r e d t h e h e a t e v o l v e d
on p r e c i p i t a t i o n of c e m e n t i t e f r o m c~-Fe w h i c h had
b e e n e q u i l i b r a t e d a t t e m p e r a t u r e s o f 350 ~ to 700~
and from the results calculated the solubility. Their
r e s u l t s a t 700~ a r e l o w e r t h a n t h o s e o f S w a r t z o r of
S m i t h o r of E q . [13] a n d t h e i r h e a t of s o l u t i o n w a s
o n l y 12.5 k c a l p e r g - a t o m of c a r b o n . A t 500 ~ to 600~
t h e i r v a l u e s a g r e e w i t h t h e c a l c u l a t e d c u r v e of F i g . 9
w h i l e a t l o w e r t e m p e r a t u r e s t h e y a r e m o r e n e a r l y in
line with the data of S w a r t z .
T h e c u r v a t u r e in t h e line f o r t h e f r e e e n e r g y of
F e s C s h o w n in F i g . 7 m a y now b e r e c o n s i d e r e d . T h i s
i s not to b e b r u s h e d a s i d e a s e x p e r i m e n t a l e r r o r s i n c e
VOLUME 3, JANUARY 1972-61
it is b a s e d on c l o s e l y a g r e e i n g i n v e s t i g a t i o n s which
in a l l o t h e r r e s p e c t s have been w e l l - s u b s t a n t i a t e d . It
was shown that the c u r v a t u r e could be a c c o u n t e d f o r
by a heat c a p a c i t y change in the r e a c t i o n of ACp = - 3 . 4
c a l p e r deg m o l e . T h i s would m a k e its m o l a r heat
c a p a c i t y at 1200~ about 26.4 c a l p e r deg. In view of
T a b l e V only an a b r u p t change at 1000~ could lead to
s u c h a low value. It is to be r e m e m b e r e d that the
s t a n d a r d f r e e e n e r g y of f o r m a t i o n shown in F i g . 7 is
b a s e d on the a s s u m p t i o n that the c o m p o s i t i o n is Fe3C.
V a r i a t i o n s f r o m this c o m p o s i t i o n could be e x p e c t e d to
a f f e c t the t h e r m o d y n a m i c p r o p e r t i e s . At the p r e s e n t
t i m e , h o w e v e r , no q u a n t i t a t i v e explanation of the c u r v a t u r e can be o f f e r e d . F u r t h e r r e s e a r c h on this q u e s t i o n
is c l e a r l y n eed ed .
In Fig. 7 a point is shown at 1000~ w h i c h is c a l c u lated f r o m the s o l u b i l i t y of c e m e n t i t e in a - F e and the
known f r e e e n e r g y d i f f e r e n c e b e tw e e n a - and y - F e .
A s t r a i g h t line f r o m this point to that c a l c u l a t e d f r o m
the e u t e c t i c at 1421~ is r e p r e s e n t e d by the e q u a t i o n
3 Fe(v) + C ( g ra p h it e ) = Fe3C
AC} = 2 6 8 5 - 2.625T
[14]
[15]
[16J
E x t r a p o l a t i o n to l o w e r t e m p e r a t u r e s i n d i c a t e s that
X b e c o m e s a m o r e s t a b l e phase than Fe3C at t e m p e r a t u r e s below about 500~
The t r i p l e point X-O-or is
not a c c u r a t e l y d e t e r m i n e d by the data. K r i s e m e n t , 6~
using the method of B o r e l i u s and B e r g l u n d , 5~ found
that the p r e c i p i t a t e f o r m e d at 230~ was c e m e n t i t e
w h e r e a s at 188 ~ to 218~ a d i f f e r e n t c a r b i d e which he
c a l l e d Fe2C a p p e a r e d . T h e c a u s e of the b r e a k in his
c u r v e r e m a i n s o b s c u r e . J a c k found that p e r s i s t e d
62-VOLUME 3, JANUARY 1972
[17]
[18]
= 10,520-- 4 . 2 1 T
[19]
= G~e (y) - 8 8 3 0 y ~
+ R T In (1 - Y C )
1.21]
For the solution of graphite
gives
C(graphite)
AG~
i n l i q u i d i r o n E q . [7 ]
= C(in/-Fe)
= 5400 -- 3 . 9 8 T
[22]
and
G-C(/) = G ~ ( l , i n f . d i l . ) + R T In z C
+ (3.29T + 15,550)y C
[23]
F r o m t h e s e i t i s e v i d e n t t h a t t h e h e a t o f s o l u t i o n in
c a l o r i e s i s 5400 + 1 5 , 5 5 0 y c w h i l e t h e i n c r e a s e i n e n t r o p y i s 3.98 - 3 . 2 9 y c - R In z C 9 F o r t h e l i q u i d s o l u tion the partial molar free energy of iron is
GFe(/) = G~e(l)-(1.65T
+ 7770)y~
+ RT
in ( 1 - Y c )
[24]
In c~-5-Fe the free energy of solution of carbon
E q . [9] i n t h e r a n g e 500 ~ to 1 7 6 8 ~ i s :
C(graphite)
s176
by
= C(in a\Fe)
= 25,400-
ll.40T
[25]
In (1 - Y C )
[26]
= Fe3C(O)
A G ~ = 2685 - 2 . 6 2 5 T
[27]
shown
= Fe2.zC(x)
2.50T
[28]
carbide precipitate is made from reported observations during aging. From its apparent solubility and
that of graphite in c~-Fe we derive the equation
2.4 Fe a + C(graphite)
= Fee.4C(s precipitate)
METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS
[29]
including solu-
[20]
F r o m t h e s e e q u a t i o n s it i s e v i d e n t t h a t w h e n g r a p h i t e
dissolves in austenite the increase in entropy is 4.21
-R
In z C c a l p e r ~ . g - a t o m , a n d i t s h e a t o f s o l u t i o n
in calories is 10,520 + 17,660y C. For iron the partial
m o l a r f r e e e n e r g y b y E q . [6] i s :
GFe(austenite)
AG = 1 9 , 3 0 0 -- 6 . 1 3 T
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author is indebted to Stuart Nelson
and Donald
T . H a w k i n s f o r a s s i s t a n c e in c o m p u t a t i o n a n d to R a l p h
H u l t g r e n a n d to a n a n o n y m o u s r e v i e w e r f o r h e l p f u l
comments on the manuscript.
This study was supported at Massachusetts
Institute of Technology by
the Army Research Office--Durham, and the American
Iron and Steel Institute, and at Berkeley by the Inorganic Materials Research Division of the Lawrence
R a d i a t i o n L a b o r a t o r y a n d t h e U . S. A t o m i c E n e r g y
Commission.
REFERENCES
1. M. Hansen and K. Anderko Constitution of Binary Alloys. McGraw-Hall,New
York, 2ncl ed., 1958.
2. J F. Elhott and M. Gleiser Thermochemistry for Steelmakmg, AddisonWesley, Reading, Massachusetts, Vol I, 1960
3. M. Benz and J. F. Ellion Trans TMS-A1ME, 1961, vol. 221, pp. 323-31 ; Trans
TMS-AIME, 1961, vol. 221, p. 888.
4. R. A. Buckley and W. Hume-Rothery: J. Iron Steel Inst., a) 1960, vol 196,
pp. 403-06; b) 1962, vol. 200, pp. 142-43.
5. L. S. Darken and R. W. Gurry: The Physwal Chemistry of Metals, McGrawHill, New York, 1953.
6. R. Hultgren, R L. Orr, P. D. Anderson, and K. K. Kelley: Selected Fahtes of
Thermodynamic Properties of Metals and Alloys, John Wiley and Sons, New
York, 1953.
7. E. Scheil, T. Schmldt, and J Wunnmg. Arch Eisenhuettenw., 1961, vol 32,
pp. 251-60
8 S Ban-ya, J. F Elhott, and J. Chlpman: Met Trans, 1970, vol. 1, pp. 131320.
9. J. C. Swartz: Trans. TMS-AIME, a) 1967, vol 239, pp 68-75, b) 1969, vol.
245, pp. 1083-91.
10. A. Ferner and M. Olette: C. R. Acad. Sct., Paris, 1962, vol. 254, pp. 2322-24.
11. J. P. Morris, E F. Foerster, C W. Schultz, and G. R Zellars U S Bur Mmes,
Rept. Invest. no. 6723, 1966.
12. M. Olette and A. Ferrter: The Physical Chemistry of Metalhc Solunons and
Intermetallic Compounds, Nat. Phys. Lab., U. K, Symp. No. 9, Paper 4H,
H M. StaUonery Office, London, 1959
13. P. D. Anderson and R. Hultgren: Trans. TMS-AIME, 1962, vol. 224, pp. 84245.
14. W. A Dench and O Kubaschewskl J. Iron Steel Inst., 1963, vol. 201, pp 14043.
15, M Braun Ubet die spezifische Warme von Elsen, Kobalt, und Nickel lm
Bereich hoher Temperaturen, Inaugural DissertaUon, Universitat zu Koln,
Germany, 1964.
16. D. C. Wallace, P. H. Sidles, G. C. Danielson. J. Appl. Phys., 1960, vol. 31, pp.
168-76.
17. R. L. Orr and J. Chipman: Trans. TMS-AIME, 1967, vol 239, pp. 630-33
18. F. D. Rossini: J. Chem. Thermodynamws, 1970, vol 2, pp. 447-59.
19. H. Dunwald and C. Wagner: Z. Anorg Allgem. Chem., 1931, vol 199, pp
321-46.
20. R P. Smith: J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1946, vol. 68, pp. 1163-75
21. H. Schenck and H. Kaiser: Arch. Eisenhuettenw., 1960, vol 31, pp. 227-35.
o2. E. Schurmann, T. Schmidt, and H. Wegener: Gtesserei, 1964, vol. 16, pp. 91-98.
23. C. Wells: Trans ASM, 1938, vol. 26, p 289.
24. R. W. Gurry: AIME Trans., 1942, vol. 150, pp. 147-53.
25. F. Adcock: 9'. Iron Steel lnst., I937, vol. 135, p. 281.
26. F D. Rachardson and W. E. Denms: Trans. Faraday Soc., 1953, vol 49, pp
171-80.
27. J. Chlpman Met. Trans., 1970, vol. 1, pp. 2163-68.
28. T. Syu, A. V. Polyakov, and A. M. Samarm lzv. Vyssh. Ucheb. Zaved., Chem.
Met., 1959, no. l l , p p 3-12.
29. R. Ruer and J. Blren: Z. Anorg. Allgem. Chem. 1920, vol 113, pp. 98-112.
30. J. Chlpman, R. M. Alfred, L. W. Gott, R. B. Small, D. M. Wilson,C. N. Thomson, D. L. Guernsey, and J. C. Fulton" Trans. ASM, 1952, vol 44, pp 1215-30.
31. J. A. Kitchener, J. O'M. Bockns, and D. A. Spratt: Trans. Faraday Soc., 1952,
vol. 48, p 608.
32. J. A. Cahill, A. D Kirshenbaum, and A V Grosse. Trans. ASM, 1964, vol 57,
VOLUME 3, JANUARY 1972-63
pp. 417-26.
33. A. A. Vertman, V. K. Grigorovlch, N. A. Nedumov, and A. M. Samarm: Dokl.
Akad. Nauk. SSSR, 1964, vol 159, pp 121-24.
34 J. C Ruth and M. Turpin: C R. Acad. Sct., Paris, 1967, vol. 265, pp. 786-88.
35. C. Boulanger: C R. Acad. ScL, Paris, 1955, vol. 241, p. 1133.
36 R. F. Mehl and C Wells: Trans. A1ME, 1937, vol. 125, p. 429.
37. R. P. Smith and L. S. Darken Trans. A1ME, 1959, vol. 215, p. 727
38. E. Schurmann, T. Schmidt, and F. Tdlmann: Giessereiforschung, 1967, vol.
19, pp. 35-41.
39. R. P. Smith' Trans TMS-AIME, 1962, vol. 224, pp 105-11.
40. N. J Perch: J Iron Steellnst., 1944, vol. 149, pp. 143-50.
41. W Glud, K V. Otto, and H. Rltter: Bet. Ges Kohlentech., 1929, vol. 3, p. 40.
42. U. Hofmann and E. Groll Z. Anorg. Allgem. Chem., 1930, vol. 191, p. 414.
43. H. A. Bahr and V. Jessen: Bet. Deut Chem. Ges., 1933, vol. 66, p. 1238.
44. G. Hagg: Z. Krtstallogr., 1934, vol 89, p. 92.
45. K. H. Jack Proc. Roy. Soc., 1948, A, vol. 195, p 56
46. L. S. Darken and R W. Gurry: A1ME Trans., 1951, pp 1015-18.
47, R. P. Smith Trans TMS-A1ME, 1959, vol. 215, pp. 954-57.
48. M. Hlllert: ActaMet., 1955, vol. 3, pp 37-38.
49. T Watase: J. Chem. Soc Japan, 1933, vol 54, pp 110-32.
50. L C. Browning, T. W. DeWitt, andP. H. Emmett: J. Am Chem. Soc., 1950,
vol. 72, pp. 4211-17.
64-VOLUME
3, J A N U A R Y 1 9 7 2
51. H. Seltz, H. J. McDonald, and C. Wells: AIME Tranx, 1940, voi. 140, pp. 263
78.
52. C. Schwarz and H. Uhhch: Arch. Eisenhuettenw., 1936, vol. 10, p. 11.
53. G. Naeser: Mttt. Kaiser Wilhelm Inst. Eisenforsch. Dusseldorf, 1934, vol. 16,
pp. 207-10.
54. K. K. Kelley and E G. King: U. S. Bur MinesBull. no. 592, 1961.
55. J. Mazur and W. Zacharko: ActaPhys. Polon., 1969, vol. 35, pp. 91-99 (in
Enghsh).
56 S. Umino: Sci. Repts. Tohoku Imp. Univ., 1935, ser. 1, vol. 23, p. 665.
57. K. K. Kelley U.S. Bur. MinesBull. no. 584, 1960.
58. G. Borehus and S. Berglund: Ark. Fys., 1951, vol. 4, p. 173.
59. J P. S6nateur, R. Fruchart, and A. Michel: C R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 1962, vol.
255, p 1615.
60. L. J E. Hofer. U. S. Bur. Mines, Bull. no. 631, 1966.
61. O Knsement Ark. Fys., 1953, vol. 7, no. 27, pp. 353-55.
62. Mme. P. Lasage: Ann. Chim., 1961, vol. 6, no. 13, p. 623
63. K. H. Jack: J. Iron Steellnst., 1951, vol. 169, pp. 26-36.
64. A. L. Tsou, J Nutting, and J W. Menter: J. Iron Steellnst., 1952, vol. 172,
pp. 163-71.
65. J Butler, P. Chollet, and C. Crussard: C. R. Aead. Sci., Paris, 1962, vol. 225,
pp 2961-63.
66 R. A. Arndt and A. C. Damask: ActaMet., 1964, vol. 12, p. 341.
METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS