You are on page 1of 5
RUBRICS FOR WRITING OBJECTIVES (Intensive & Responsive Samples) SCORE AREA 0 1 The student was unable | The student was able to tose the target form(s) | use the target form) ACCURACY | successfully most ofthe | successfully most of the time. time. + 0 1 The student'slanguage _| The student's language generally had problems | generally did nothave with comprehensibility, | problems with \d/or it was not in comprehensibility. and COMMUNICATION | * a p yan accordance with the was in accordance with prompts or taskmost of | the prompts ortask most the time. of the time. TOTAL 0 2 RUBRICS FOR SPEAKING OBJECTIVES SCORE AREA 0 1 The student was unable _| St was able to use target tousetargetform(s) | form(s) successfully most ACCURACY _ | successfully oronly did | ofthe time without so after receiving assistance. assistance. + 0 1 Tncomprehensible ‘Comprehensible language language at least 50% of | mostof the time, in the time, notin accordance with a accordance with a successful completionof COMMUNICATION | successful completion of | the task, and thetask, orambiguous | characterized by correct, because of misused use of vocabulary vocabulary TOTAL 0 2 READING QUIZ Four-question multiple-choice quiz based on one of the readings in the book The score is calculated as shown in the following table: CORRECT ANSWERS POINTS Poa Poe 4 2 RUBRICS FOR ALP (AUTONOMOUS LEARNING PROJECT) ALP SCORE, Effectiveand| Competent [Presentation | Presentation creative presentation | lacked offtask presentation planning and creativity Thorough | Adequate Presentation [No delivery delivery was poorly | presentation or structured | submission of work Very good | Mostlydlear |Tnadequate | Demonstrated usc ofvisual | andlogical | ornouse of | neither aids visual aids | thought nor DESCRIPTION effort Carefilly | Gooduseof [Poor prepared —_| visual aids delivery and presentation difficult to — follow Togically | Some syntactic structured | and semantic presentation | flaws present. and message — — mostly understandable TOTAL, 3 2 1 0 Criteria to evaluate performance in Oral Examinations Rubric] Reference Performance Rating Very Good / Good ‘Uses most or all of the appropriate Ianguage functions and forms. Can be resourceful in compensating with alternatives when unable to use the target language. Few of no major errors. If present, they do not interfere with the task or general comprehensibility Pronunciation is highty intelligible. Fluent most or al of the time with the possibility of having occasional hnesitations and pauses 1 | Fair/ Average ‘Uses some appropriate language ‘functions and forms Presence of major errors that can affect communication at times. Prommnciation is usually intelligible, although some utterances are difficult to understand. Pauses and hesitations are noticeable, leading to slower speech. Needs Reinforcement ‘Altemps to use appropriate Ianguage functions and forms, but few are used, Frequent major erggrs,and Wey cause repeatedly inaccurate communication. Pronunciation errors cleatly affect intelligibility, with many utterances being difficult to understand. Pauses, hesitations and false starts are frequent and speech is slow overall.

You might also like