Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 93-1557
JEROME E. CASSELL,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
BARRY OSBORN, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
_________________
No. 93-1607
JEROME E. CASSELL,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees,
_________________
No. 93-2079
JEROME E. CASSELL,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
LINCOLN SOLDATI,
Defendant, Appellee.
_________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
_________________
Per Curiam.
__________
from the
plaints
1915(d).
of three civil
rights com-
claims
filed during
the
pendency
of parallel
state
criminal proceedings.
Plaintiff was convicted in
of
civil rights
trial criminal
the wrongfulness
of 42 U.S.C.
1985(3), or both.
of some
are rambling,
we provide the
allegations found
Two of the
1983, or 42 U.S.C.
He filed three
in the
to follow,
following
complaints and
related filings.2
____________________
1We are informed
pending before the New
party has requested a
sua sponte because of
___ ______
proper workings of our
No. 93-1607.
names as
Filed
defendants a parole
complaining
witness
in
plaintiff's
state trial
officers
intimidated
conspired
with her,
plaintiff
of
counsel is
plaintiff's
counsel.
the
to
The gist
complaining
sexual
officers, the
state criminal
falsely accuse
aggravated
accused of
case,
is that
witness,
the state
and ultimately
and wrongfully
assault.
convict
Plaintiff's
ineffective assistance,
and
trial
incompetence and
malpractice.
No. 93-1557.
unidentified officers
vidual
capacities, and,
again, plaintiff's
trial counsel.
It
tional because they are written in a way which encourages constitutional violations, conspiracies to suborn
convictions;
enforced
and
the laws
that
with
the
state
defendants administered
extreme indifference
and
thereby depriving
93-2079.
the district
This complaint
was filed
on August 3,
first two
complaints.
It contains
____________________
Their crux
is that the
prejudicial remarks
during trial.
to the jury,
On appeal
and made
plaintiff charac-
role as
plaintiff
sought
leave
to
proceed
complaint under 28
magistrate construed
U.S.C.
1915(d).
As
in
forma
review of each
the
habeas
observed
variety of
claims.
was
deficiencies
Following the
given an
opportunity to
claim.
statements
in the
See Forte
___ _____
amend the
of the
monetary
cases, plaintiff
complaints to
cure the
3 (1st Cir.
1991); Purvis v. Ponte, 929 F.2d 822, 826-27 (1st Cir. 1991).
______
_____
to the third complaint,
As
court may
dismiss
claims based
on indisputably
See
___
1915(d)
meritless
the state
exhibits which
to
the magistrate's
criminal prosecution
first
two
first time,
remained pending.3
While
the district court was thus aware of the possible pendency of the
magistrate's
de novo
review, the
reports and
district court
recommendations for
adopted the
dismissal on
the
1983 claims
for
These claims
have at their
seek
the plaintiff
____________________
475,
490 (1973).5
circumvent the
section 1983
exhaustion
not be
requirement's important
action may
to correct
by permitting
used to
function
state courts
of
the
See
___
of
the
damages
claims,
too,
requires
consideration
pending state
proceedings.
money damages
under
may . . . undermine
Id. at 1252.
___
there
is "no
under
federal law
retention of
cannot be
question that
sufficient
the [complaint]
to justify
jurisdiction," civil
When
allege[s] injuries
the District
Court's
which
____________________
of the
state case.
Deakins v.
_______
Mon____
exists.'"
Preferring a stay
Id. at 202-03
___
to a dismissal
of a
(citation omit-
under the
borrowed
containing various
in their asserUnder
28 U.S.C.
incentive to
repetitive
refrain
lawsuits."
from filing
Neitzke, 490
_______
frivolous, malicious,
U.S. at
324.
or
To prevent
as much
as at
There
of
may
federal
the
prosecuting
authorities
a tactical advantage
and witnesses.
or to harass
Section
1915(d)
The preference
rather than
facts "suffi-
frivolous.6
Where a complaint filed under
deficient, though perhaps
described in Neitzke,"
_______
decide
whether it
should be
dismissed for
failure to
state a
protections
be implicated in such
Comity
(same).
criminal proceed-
ing, a stay is the only option, since "the potential for federal____________________
J.
Conversely, where
the decision will not affect issues which should first be decided
by the state court,
sion.
Accord Duncan
______ ______
v. Gunter,
______
15 F.3d
F.2d 772,
989 (10th
Cir. 1994)
in Medicine, 904
____________
781 (1st
decided
Board of Registration
_____________________
Cir. 1990)
(civil rights
case normally
immunity
claims
Williams
________
and
by
should
sovereign
the federal
v. Hepting,
_______
be stayed,
immunity
court,
844 F.2d
but where
barred
they
quasi-judicial
consideration of
were properly
138, 143-45
(3d
the
dismissed);
Cir.) (staying
discussion, affirming
dismissal of
denied,
______
1309 (8th Cir. 1990) (staying certain claims but dismissing timebarred claims), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1126 (1991).
____ ______
To
avoid
conflict, caution
district
criminal proceeding.
Guerro, 498
______
court may
indicated whenever
judicata in a state
________
at 208;
is
F.2d
at 1253.
exercise its
be diffi-
In
the
asserted as
discretion under
the
1915(c) to
pinpointing the
or
it may choose,
proceedings are
sua sponte, to
___ ______
terminated.
Cf.
___
order a stay
at 133-35
require exhaustion
the
event the
habeas and
court decides
to stay
conclusion
of the
burden on
state
the monetary
In
claims, the
court proceedings,
court.
thus reducing
Guerro, 498
______
the
F.2d at 1254
n.15.
Applying
question that
these
principles
here,
there
seems little
matter of
federal law.
Dismissals on
this basis
would not
there is
state trial
attorney
defendants' actions
no showing that
1985(3) cannot be
(1993).
are
found an
The
barred because
there
are
no
purposes of
1983);
facts
Polk
____
787
11
of any showing
against
state officials,
by Eleventh
in
their official
Amendment immunity.
The monetary
capacities
See Will
___ ____
v.
Michigan Dep't of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 70-71 & n.10 (1989).
______________________________
federal doctrine
of absolute
prosecutorial immunity.
See
___
state's case
insofar
as the
conduct is
intimately
also Buckley v. Fitzsimmons, 113 S. Ct. 2606, 2616 (1993) (quali____ _______
___________
fied immunity extends to
tive functions).
prosecutor
Although
the state
immunity, they are infirm for the additional reason that they are
grounded in alleged negligence.
to implicate
Davidson v.
________
Cannon, 474
______
U.S. 344, 348 (1986); Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327 (1986).7
_______
________
The
dismissal of
plaintiff's monetary
claims against
____________________
the state
is
more problematic.
Plaintiff's
susceptible
"amendment" attempts
to tie
state sufficient
broadly based on a
facts to sustain
of being raised as
a claim, a
an estoppel in
to
in the state
failure to
decision arguably
Plaintiff's
rately
disorganized presentation
to compare
the issues in
think the
makes it
the two
difficult accu-
proceedings or
to be
for dismissal.
course is
to remand
We
these
as
determined without
to
in
whether their
any way
legal
affecting
sufficiency
issues in
the
can
be
state
pending
93-2079 is
affirmed.
________
The judgment
complaints in
dismissing the
case
is remanded
to
the
district court
13
for
proceedings