Professional Documents
Culture Documents
_________________________
Nos. 95-1004
95-1200
AUDLEY McINTOSH,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
Defendants, Appellees.
_________________________
_________________________
Before
_________________________
_________________________
December 1, 1995
_________________________
arrested
and allegedly
appellant
U.S.C.
the
manhandled by
Audley
1983.
I.
I.
McIntosh commenced
The
the ground
McIntosh appeals.
officers, plaintiff-
civil
defendants' favor on
Boston police
action under
42
summary judgment in
that McIntosh
had brought
We affirm.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
We
congenial
See Pagano v.
___ ______
Boston
morning
police officers
of January
wrongfully detained
boot.
7,
1990.
him for
That afternoon,
arrested appellant
He
alleges that
several hours
the
during the
gendarmes
to
appellant to the
emergency
room
of a
local hospital
with
where
he was
treated and
In short
all
the charges.
prepared a
order, a Massachusetts
At
a much
causes
of
later date,
four-page complaint
premised on 42 U.S.C.
action.
1983.
It
appellant's attorney
confined exclusively to
a claim
named
Commissioner
Francis
defendants.
On January 7, 1993
Mayor
Roache,
appellant's infelicitous
and
Raymond
several
"John
three years to
Flynn,
Police
Does"
as
the lawyer
the
the
original complaint,
clerk
by
with
certified mail.
abbreviated facsimile
6:00
the required
The
clerk's
transmission
7).1
filing fee,
office
after hours
to the
received
(i.e.,
the
between
the office on January 8 and a deputy clerk docketed the case that
day.
The
wrongdoing,
statute of
and
defendants
and asserted
an
limitations.
a belated
effort
defendants moved
56(c).
answered
the
complaint,
affirmative defense
to reconfigure
for brevis
______
the suit,2
disposition under
denied
any
based on
the
of discovery
the remaining
Fed. R. Civ.
P.
____________________
demand for
the complaint,
sent by
facsimile
2On January
that spelled out
abuse of
assault
of
emotional distress,
an amended complaint
including
negligent supervision,
civil conspiracy,
and negligence.
The
the chronology,
either as a means
for bringing
we doubt the
of asserting neoteric
that "John
66 F.3d
statutes of limitations,
individual
police officers
suit).
466,
Doe" designation
circumvent
Because we dispose
belatedly
vehicle
(2d
cannot be
and affirming
added to
of the appeal
amended complaint
claims or as a
efficacy of the
Given
Cir. 1995)
employed to
judgment for
a civil
rights
on other grounds,
we
the
court denied
Rule 56 motion
delinquent
produced.
a third request
opposition
that
decided the
appellant's
counsel
eventually
summary
and subsequently
judgment motion
when
no timely
opposition is
filed).
II.
II.
The district
that
court rested
its decision on
the ground
On appeal,
we start
A.
A.
Summary
judgment is
appropriate when
the "pleadings,
together
show
with
the affidavits,
if any,
that there
is entitled to judgment
as a matter
56(c).
rule
We have
of law."
moving party
Fed. R. Civ.
is no
P.
of this
1995); Morris v.
______
Government Dev. Bank, 27 F.3d 746, 748 (1st Cir. 1994); National
_____________________
________
cert.
_____
v. Rostoff, 39
_______
F.3d 27,
F.3d 56,
347; Wynne v.
_____
cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. 1845 (1993); United States v. One Parcel
_____ ______
_____________
__________
of Real
Property (Great
Harbor Neck,
960
___________________________________________________________
959
F.2d
349,
351-52 (1st
Cir.
1992);
Medina-Munoz
____________
v. R.J.
____
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 896 F.2d 5, 7-8 (1st Cir. 1990); Garside v.
____________________
_______
Osco Drug, Inc., 895 F.2d 46, 48-49 (1st Cir. 1990), and it would
_______________
It
suffices
pierce the
to reaffirm
that
boilerplate of the
"summary judgment's
role
is to
the parties'
actually required."
To
be sure,
the
district court's
assessment of
the
The
8.
See
___
This
targets
burden
"produce
27 F.3d
See
___
rhetoric.
nonmoving party,
motion
of
proof.
In
that
specific facts, in
at
748,
in order
circumstance,
the
nonmovant must
to
demonstrate the
presence
of
trialworthy issue
and thereby
deflect
the sharp
blade of
the
Questions
passage of time on
anent
the applicability
and effect
See, e.g.,
___ ____
of the
And
when
suit is time
of identifying
See, e.g.,
___ ____
B.
B.
The
1983
claim.
linchpin of
the appellant's
case is
his section
claim.3
Section
1983 creates
private right
rights.
of action
for
federal constitutional
See
___
supplemental
1367(c)(3)) acted
exercising
jurisdiction
under
court,
its
discretion,
contemporaneous with
"no legitimate
filed,
_____
64
28
in jettisoning the
may
federal question
dismiss
pendent
Consequently,
claims
of trial, that
exist[s]"), petition
________
(1995).
F.3d 980,
a determination, in advance
U.S.L.W. 3250
U.S.C.
990-91 (1st
in
no
for cert.
___ _____
we need
not
in
processing
a built-in statute of
such
actions,
Section 1983
limitations.
federal
court
must
Therefore,
lift
F.2d at 352.
for
or assault),
Street v.
______
Vose, 936
____
L. ch. 260,
F.2d 38, 40
2A (1992);
see also
___ ____
(per curiam),
cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1063 (1992), and the parties agreed before
_____ ______
the
statute
to derive
was appropriate to
the limitation
period.
Thus,
the question
his
In this venue,
same
underlying
appellant tried to
for malicious
configured
6-7]
assumption.
At
the
argument, however,
the
take advantage of
limitation period.
claim as one
the differently
See Calero-Colon
___ ____________
v. Betancourt___________
(discussing
characterization).
oral
the appeal on
prosecution to
at
need
This effort
and
methodology
comes too
late and
for
such
offers too
little.
rights
and
battery."
The
complaint
did
not
mention
malicious
prosecution
suggest
and, indeed,
there
is
nothing
prosecution
may
have
transpired.
Since
in the
record
to
the
district
court
properly
arrest,
characterized the
the
question
suit as
question before
to the
us is
it stood
as one
precisely
for false
the same
court responded.
as the
We review the
question de novo.
See
___
Rivera_______
Although the
law, the
federal
jurisprudence of
law in
order
section
to determine
1983 directs
the
from state
us to
examine
accrual period.
See
___
748.
Under
"knows, or
is
based."
federal
law, accrual
starts
when
the
plaintiff
Rivera-Muriente,
_______________
959 F.2d
at
353.
Most accrual
run, that
is,
Calero-Colon, ___
____________
at 749.
Here, the
relevant
1990; the
of action accrued.
See, e.g.,
___ ____
the hospital
Thus, the
date,
latter.
and
all the
the pivotal
Consequently,
But
the
controversy
we
must
in this
shine
case
the
concerns the
light
of
our
understanding on
McIntosh took
an action sufficient
to interrupt the
running of
III.
III.
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
the
time
for
bringing
suit
ran
out
on
January
7,
1993;
the
appellant's
action
was
not
accordingly,
the
suit was
filed until
untimely.
the
The
next
day;
appellant
and,
offers a
court
erred in
determining that
time
had passed
him by.
We
A.
A.
The
transmission
appellant
satisfied
Filing By Facsimile.
Filing By Facsimile.
___________________
posits
the
that the
January
filing requirements
the graveyard.
Absent
a local
of
facsimile
the
Civil
He is whistling past
rule authorizing
the practice,
As
of January
pertinent part:
7, 1993,
the Civil
Rules provided
in
court,
established by
Fed. R. Civ. P.
5(e).4
has "authorized
courts,
permit
effective December
the clerk
to
1,
1991, to
accept for
adopt
filing
facsimile
permitted
only (1) in
practice
1991."
which
to
papers transmitted
by
that such
compelling circumstances
was established
by the
court
filing is
or (b)
under a
prior to
May 1,
(1991).
The appellant
facsimile
local rules
is permissible.
argues that,
since the
This argument
disregards both
the
For
granted
the
one thing,
the
Conference, at
limited authorization
to
which
the same
time it
we have
alluded,
. . . of court documents
by
facsimile would
administrative
facsimile
and was
present practical
and resource
burden to
not brought
attorney's
about by
nonchalance.
the courts."
in the most
the
Id.
___
The
mundane of contexts
Thus,
create an
but by
circumstances
the
are hardly
"compelling."
plain language of
Rule 5(e).
Implicit therein
is the
concept
The
Advisory
____________________
4Later
in 1993,
Committee described
at "permit[ting]
Rule
5(e)
was
amended.
10
5(e), advisory
that, absent
B.R.
filed
13, 17
See,
___
by facsimile, such
(N.D.N.Y. 1993)
(holding that
a notice
154
of appeal
superfluous.
The appellant's
rule should
give effect,
phrase contained in
whenever possible, to
the rule's
1978),
The local
the District
In
of Massachusetts
filing is
this
was
requirements of
do not
authorize
the filing
of
case,
moreover,
transmission
(N.D. Ala.
papers by facsimile.
v. Board of
_________
v. Ven-Fuel, Inc.,
______________
and
to statutory construction), we
lead.
every word
the
appellant's
reasons.
First,
incomplete.
Although
the
are to be
facsimile
the January 7
notice
pleading
construed liberally,
there
action, half
a complaint
For purposes
particularly
of commencing an
an unsigned half
that
is no
better than
send even
the partial
none.
Second,
facsimile
the appellant
transmission
did not
until after
11
the
close
of business
on
January 7, 1993.
states
Despite the
R. Civ. P.
77(a)
word "filing"
delivery
as used
into
the
therein
actual
is a
custody
word of
art.
of
proper
the
It
"means
officer."
Casalduc v. Diaz, 117 F.2d 915, 916 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 314
________
____
_____ ______
uniformly to mean
merely
leaving
constitute
papers in
a closed
or
been interpreted
be kept open
vacant office
commencement of
does not
an action.5
636,
F.2d
Charles
A.
Procedure
_________
Wright
&
Arthur R.
B.
B.
The
deemed to
mailed
Miller,
appellant
have been
on that
acknowledges,
proposition
that
strength of
his
argues
filed on
date.
the
Filing By Mailing.
Filing By Mailing.
_________________
Rules
hawks
thesis
the complaint
January 7, 1993,
This is
Civil
he
that
a hard
do
not
therefore
that the
because it
sell; as
so
rises
district
should
be
was
the appellant
provide,
and
the
or
falls on
the
court
should
have
____________________
5After
delivery
117
have
hours,
papers
to the clerk or
F.2d at 916.
can
validly
filed
In addition, some
established so-called
be
by
in-hand
See Casalduc,
___ ________
"night depositories"
to accommodate
after-hours
filings.
night depository,
and we take
no view of
the efficacy of
that
practice.
12
Mass.
action
with
R. Civ.
P.
3 permits
the
clerk
of the
appropriate
the
commencement of
an
court
or
by mailing
the
registered mail.
Thus, if
and state
courts have
under section
(1980)
to sue in the
state court
concurrent jurisdiction in
v. Thiboutot,
_________
suits brought
448 U.S. 1,
3 n.1
election,
invoke
"arising
suit
however,
choosing
to
the
in a federal venue.
Therefore, federal
district
court's
71 (1965).
The appellant
First,
he tells us
that
using the
state
federal question
procedural rule
arises under
is
fitting because
the
therefore, the
from state
law.
276-80.
But this is a
The
"[W]hen
of
borrowing directive
means no
more than
it says.
13
(1987).
Moreover, when
does
not possess
court is
a self-contained
a statute
1987).
interstices in
statute of
federal law.
limitation
The
of limitations
limitations, the
The federal
creation of
Cir.
borrows a
(7th
federal court
nonetheless applying
"looks to state
the
so simply because
is not
considered a
mantra,
federal law,
then,
is
court
that when
688, 689
bridging
borrow "only
West, 481
____
U.S. at 40 n.6.
Beyond
simpliciter,
___________
state law.
the
need
to
borrow
limitation
period
action
in a
See, e.g.,
___ ____
governed by
Fed. R.
Civ. P. 3.
Raine v. Carlson,
_____
_______
1987).
Rule 3
that
reference to
must
be filled
by
state
law, and
none is
visible to us.
The
seamlessness of
Rule 3,
and its
fit
with other
adequately covers
federal
the mechanics
district court,
clear that
and
of commencing
the rule
an
makes it
Rule 3
action in
transpicuously
In
14
purposes,
P. 5(e) defines
as "filing . .
the court."6
and
The
January 8,
receipt of
them.
period.
When papers
See Cooper
___ ______
Under the
v. City of Ashland,
_______________
was not
are mailed
the clerk's
105 (9th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); see also Torras Herreria v. M/V
___ ____ _______________
___
Timur Star, 803 F.2d 215, 216 (6th Cir. 1986) ("Filings reaching
___________
the
Co. v. York, 326 U.S. 99, 109-12 (1945), requires that we look to
___
____
the state
procedural rule
since establishing a
determine
time line
will
wash.
procedural
rules in
federal
courts cannot
begin and
end with
York.
____
Court
____________________
6Rule
judges,
with the
filing
5(e)
contains one
explicit
in their discretion, to
exception.
forthwith transmit
clerk."
15
It
allows
to be filed
the office
of the
to
serve as a talisman."
Even
intended
federal
and
state
procedural
rules
will
prove
outcome
point in dispute.
If it does, it must
be applied.
See
___
id. at
___
469-74.
collide,
federal forum.7
___ F.3d
Cutting
_______
___,
See id.;
___ ___
___ (9th
accord Aceves v.
______ ______
Cir.
1995) [1995
WL
604009, at
*8];
____________________
Corp.,
_____
There,
in a diversity case,
_____________________
application
Supreme
Court approved
the
service of process,
742-44.
the
in lieu of Fed.
R. Civ. P.
3.
See id.
___ ___
at
"statement of a
state," forming an
limitations."
that
Id. at 751-52.
___
"[federal]
Rule
determinations,"
state
statute,
does
but, rather,
not
exists
"each controlling
the
conflict;
both
Massachusetts
does
place,
cannot be
In
is simply
a substantive
the role of
side" with
intended sphere
the
of
extent, are
in direct
the second
place, the
a procedural
state policy.
Rule 3 as
In
that
applied.
"address[ing]
policy
and, to
procedural rule
not implicate
own
such
Id. at 752.
___
at bar is not
same purpose
"side by
its
replace
a tolling
In
rule; it
the third
to refrain from
provision for a
statute of
from state
16
by federal law
or borrowed
Frechette
_________
Court
wrote in
Hanna, "to
_____
hold that
a Federal
Rule
of Civil
As the
mode of
attempt to
There is
. .
. ."
380 U.S.
at 473-74.
state law.
To
recapitulate,
the
general
rule
is
that
merely
placing
complaint in
sufficient to mark
court.
rule.
This case
It
the
does not
the commencement
constitute
of an action
follows
inexorably
seasonably commence
his suit
that
the
by mailing
filing
in a
federal
maw of the
general
appellant
the
did
not
complaint to
the
C.
C.
We
have
Miscellaneous Arguments.
Miscellaneous Arguments.
_______________________
considered
all
the
appellant's
them to be unpersuasive.
Only
remaining
three of them
1.
1.
district
within
court
which
allowed the
to
oppose
the
appellant
two
defendants'
The
extensions of
motion
for
time
summary
judgment,
but
assigns error.
balked
the third
time
around.
The appellant
We discern none.
The administration
of filing deadlines is
a matter of
17
case
management
discretion.
that
See Mendez v.
___ ______
comes
within
the
district
court's
4, 6
expect
that
extensions on
courts will
demand
district court's
to suit
to their
lawyers'
every
tune, granting
schedules.
seeking
dance
Litigants cannot
see no hint
the
Given
attorney in
of any arbitrariness
See
___
Harlow Fay, Inc. v. Federal Land Bank, 993 F.2d 1351, 1352
________________
__________________
(8th
Baker v. Raulie, 879 F.2d 1396, 1399 (6th Cir. 1989); Clinkscales
_____
______
___________
v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 831 F.2d 1565, 1569 (11th Cir. 1987).
____________________
2.
2.
Waiver.
Waiver.
______
move
for judgment
on
the limitations
foothold in
the
law.
defense
earlier in
the
This
assertion has
no
waived it.
The
defendants raised
the
affirmative
Fed. R.
Civ. P. 8(c),
12(b)(6), 12(h)(2).
See
___
They were
under no
a plaint
____________________
8Counsel's statement
amounts to
able
to
meet the
handling
or
suffer
time
the
consequences."
of
matters they
Pinero Schroeder
_________________
are
v.
Federal Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n, 574 F.2d 1117, 1118 (1st Cir. 1978)
____________________________
(per curiam).
9In an abundance of
opposition
expired.
that the
Even
appellant
filed after
the untimely
the last
extension
considered, nothing
18
obligation
limitations
to do
more.
Once
defendant
raises
See Pessotti
___ ________
1991).
timely
There
is no
desires to force an
inequity in
946
F.2d 974,
this rule;
979 (1st
if the
Cir.
plaintiff
defense
the
forefront.
See Fed.
___
R. Civ.
so.
P. 12(c)-(d).10
Here,
the
to do
3.
3.
Disability.
Disability.
__________
afterthought,11
disability,
tolled.
is pure
"[i]ssues
suggests
that
and, therefore,
the
he
may
have
limitation
been
period
under
should
an
be
conjecture.
adverted
In any
to
on
appeal
in
perfunctory
held that
manner,
been abandoned."
____________________
pleadings."
defenses specifically
this
rule, whether
motion
shall
enumerated (1)-(7)
made
in a
move for
part:
in subdivision
pleading or
by motion,
in subdivision
(c) of
"The
(b) of
and the
this rule
11The appellant
from
as
never advanced
See Clauson
___ _______
v. Smith,
_____
1987).
19
823 F.2d
Apart
(1st Cir.
IV.
IV.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
We need go no further.
ago, an English
See
___
time,
once stolen,
McIntosh
filed
district
court's entry
favor.
Affirmed.
his
engenders
(1745).
other losses
civil action
of summary
day
As
as
late,
judgment in
well.
Because
we affirm
the
the defendants'
Affirmed.
________
20