Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 95-2232
Appellee,
v.
JOHN J. CONWAY,
Defendant, Appellant.
____________________
____________________
Before
____________________
Don
___
and
____________________
Uni
guilty to
one count
1346.
in violation
of 18 U.S.C.
level downward
departure
1343
and
court's
F.2d
for substantial
1150, 1153-54
(1st Cir.
3742.1
This is
assistance.
a broadly discretionary
claim
American
U.S.S.G. 5K1.1.
983
defraud the
refusal
four
of conspiracy to
such a case.
1993),
Mariano,
_______
but there
is an
Defendant makes
a colorable
to be made a
when the
give
the
range,
maximum sentence
under
on self-incriminating
it was
F.2d at
he
had
divulged
with
Mariano, 983
_______
applicable guideline
information
the
departure, and to
1155, the
court, while
admitting the
____________________
1.
violation
of
law."
18 U.S.C.
in
See United
___ ______
States v. Drown, 942 F.2d 55, 58 and n.6 (1st Cir. 1991).
______
_____
2.
The possibility
that in
court might
have reached the same result absent any error does not defeat
jurisdiction.
-2-
sufficiency
of
defendant's
disclosures
to
warrant
the
departure, denied
light
for a
objects
a sentence
defendant so
revealed.
Defendant
disclosures he had
provided in exchange
for a promise
We concur, and
for resentencing.
No truthful information
Conway
to
provided by
Mr.
government
attorneys or
law
officers,
pursuant to
this
enforcement
government
complies
provided
with
Conway by
that
the
terms
Mr.
the
Conway
of
this
agreement.
As to information provided by
Mr. Conway
this
agreement,
not be
applicable
U.S.S.G.
used
in
such
information
determining
guideline range,
1B1.8.
reason of
the
pursuant to
that
remand
does
not
bind
the
prosecutor's wishes,"
except
as
or
the
by
United
broad discretion
substantial
"to
comply
Mariano, 983
_______
restricted
statutes,
"retains
court
assistance
the
to
with
F.2d at 1155,
the
and that,
other
Constitution,
exhume
before
-3-
blindly
Guidelines,
States
plea agreement
the
federal
court
factors unrelated
burying
the
to
[guideline
sentencing range]."
language
of
the
Id. at 1156-57.
___
agreement,
as
We also
written,
gave it at the
promise
that,
deserves
the
time of sentencing:
defendant
received
(1)
the
information
disclosed
a motion for
action
against
calculating
him --
and, (2)
it
would not
be
used in
As written, the
defendant
his Fifth
United States v.
_____________
to be
a witness against
Hogan, 862
_____
law principles).
So
himself.
See
___
(1st Cir.
1988)
state a
There was,
court itself.
determine,
however, a difficulty,
provided by the
in lengthy
converse with
defendant,
whether he
plea,
see F.R.Crim.P.
___
agreement
fully.
obligation
under
disclosure,
11(c), the
After
the
and the
court did
explaining
agreement
consequences
to
to
make
of failing
not quote
defendant
full,
to do
the
his
truthful
so, it
stated, "Now,
-4-
supposed
to
remember it?
non-use "by
The
whole
purpose of
the plea
hearing
is to
assure full
understanding.
see
___
Hogan, 862
_____
obligation
grant
F.2d at
388,
to speak in
The objectively
was that
he was
assuming an
other things, a
True,
information "will
not be used in
guideline range,"
which we
the
prior
immunity.
exclusio
________
statement
is
observe would be
interpreted
alterius est
________ ___
are
to
superfluous if
grant
full
use
rules of
construction known
to
lawyer's
analytical
tools
in
colloquy
conducted
specifically
to
particularly
loathe to
contradict
assure
apparent
his
lay
do so
understanding.
when the
absoluteness.
effect would
At
best,
the
We
are
be to
court's
contract
under
consideration.
which
both
A plea agreement is a
parties
-5-
give
and
receive
conviction that it
have.
receives less, or a
have.
The defendant,
correspondingly,
otherwise might
F.R.Crim.P.
the agreement.
terms
the
defendant
Under
benefit
but as firm.
should
defined in absolute
expect.
Under
the
for
do so by relying
bargained
to
make
on
surely
an
immunization
defendant was
promise.
While
This
brings us to the
remand itself.
It will be
of a downward departure.
In this case,
however,
should
finding
defendant
the
had
court
rendered
government, and if
____________________
it is to
not
change
substantial
the
assistance
be rebutted it
that
to
the
must be on
new
3.
note
appear
to
the
contrary,
the
constitutional
-6-
findings, which
we suggest should be
defendant's disclosures.
stated, independent of
-7-
We
vacate
defendant's
sentence
resentencing.
and
remand
for
-8-
doubt
that
fairly, I
the defendant
agree with my
in
this
case
While I have no
has been
treated
combination of
the district
judge's unfortunate
slip of the
the change-of-plea
elicited
from the
defendant during
sentence
at
the
perception
of
sentence.
top
tongue during
use of information
debriefing to
impose a
of
the
guideline
range
unfairness
and
requires
vacation
write separately,
however, to
creates
of
the
highlight four
points.
plea
through
intelligent,
misrepresentation.
well-educated
Mr.
businessman who
Conway
is
an
was represented
he was not actually misled and the judge's lapsus linguae had
______ _______
no
actual
effect
on
the
course
of
the
proceedings.4
When the
public
perception of
justice is
imperilled by
the court's
do not apply.
____________________
4.
late
of
any
argument
on
the
court's
The defendant's
in this
-9-
is sui generis.
___ _______
permit
information
obtained
from a
during debriefing
to be used in
as the
cooperating
defendant
See U.S.S.G.
___
not impose
1B1.8(b)(5)
& n.1.
862
limitation.
misstatement
Were
it
not
during the
could have
used the
either
deny
to
for
the
judge's
inadvertent
change-of-plea colloquy,
information obtained
the
no such special
downward
departure,
the court
during debriefing
or
to
fix
the
Fourth,
v.
district
in
to
determining whether
5K1.1
motion for
grant
downward
the government's
departure.
On
section
remand,
the
district
court
information.
remains
obliged
to
consider
all
the
-10-
obligated
downward,
to
see
___
grant
the
Mariano,
_______
section 5K1.1
983
F.2d
motion
at
and
1156-57,
depart
or,
alternatively,
to impose
a sentence
at the
bottom of
the
guideline range.
respects,
required.
I agree
with my
has
premised
no
legal obligation
on an
impermissible
55, 60
resentencing is
a discretionary action
court
colleagues that
to
explain
at
consideration, the
all5
is
court
of
To this
pays a
____________________
5.
exceptions
not
sentencing court
chooses
relevant
in
the circumstances
has no legal
particular
at
obligation to explain
sentence within
why it
defined
guideline
sentencing range.
Levinson,
________
United States
_____________
v.
sentencing court
its
See, e.g.,
___ ____
narrowly
bar,
1994).
By like token, a
-11-