Professional Documents
Culture Documents
October 4, 1996
____________________
No. 95-2151
ALLAN O. DENCHFIELD,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
JULIUS E. WALLER,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
____________________
Before
____________________
____________________
____________________
Per
Curiam.
____________
Plaintiff-appellant
Allan
O.
___ __
It
was
sponte, to issue
appropriate for
1915(d).
the
We affirm.
district court,
sua
requiring Denchfield to
859 F.2d 1000, 1002 (1st Cir. 1988) ("It is too elementary to
warrant citation
to inquire
The
facts alleged
question
in the
jurisdiction.1
1
complaint do
And,
although
not confer
federal
Denchfield invoked
that
complaint is devoid of
in controversy
in excess of $50,000.00.
Once
diversity
challenged,
jurisdiction
has
party
the
burden
legal certainty
that
jurisdictional amount.
seeking
of
to
invoke
alleging
with
the claim
involves
less than
the
____________________
1Contrary
1
to Denchfield's suggestion,
a private citizen,
1983.
fails to
-2-
942
F.2d
84,
88
(1st
Cir.
1991).
we
find no error in
the dismissal.
v.
Moran,
949
that we find no
DesRosiers
We add
Accordingly,
F.2d
appointment of counsel.
15,
24
(1st
Cir.
See
___
1991)
__________
_____
appointed counsel in a
as
a whole, reflects a
broad discretion).
Affirmed.
_________
manifest abuse of
record, taken
-3-